Stans Energy / ARMZ Lithiumprojekt in Russland (Seite 72)
eröffnet am 20.10.10 07:00:01 von
neuester Beitrag 23.01.24 22:08:37 von
neuester Beitrag 23.01.24 22:08:37 von
Beiträge: 2.109
ID: 1.160.579
ID: 1.160.579
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 272.352
Gesamt: 272.352
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: CA8547221058 · WKN: A0RD0N · Symbol: HRE.H
0,0050
CAD
0,00 %
0,0000 CAD
Letzter Kurs 22.05.24 Toronto
Werte aus der Branche Rohstoffe
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 11.294,00 | +30,57 | |
| 0,7750 | +20,16 | |
| 0,5600 | +19,15 | |
| 0,7700 | +16,67 | |
| 1,2800 | +15,32 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 0,7500 | -9,09 | |
| 0,5800 | -9,38 | |
| 9,8300 | -9,73 | |
| 0,6548 | -11,57 | |
| 177,35 | -19,75 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
aus dem sh-board:
http://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?p=0&…
BOY!!! DID THE SHAREHOLDERS GET THE NEWS RELEASE WRONG!!!
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING!
Our email to David:
"Good Morning David,
I suppose you're not surprised to hear from me considering the latest course of events and news releases.
There seems to be major confusion as to exactly what has transpired and just what course of action Stans is taking with respect to these events.
The question is: Did certain factions of K/G government flair up once more, rear it's ugly head, and attempt to initiate negative action or is this a continuing action taken by Stans in response to past events, in the interest of the company's future relations with the country, government and shareholder protection.
As usual I will post you're response on the Stan's board.
Thanks kindly, as usual, for taking the time to respond.
Sincerely Yours, "
David's reply:
"There has been NO decision to revoke our licence. That proposal was put forth by the committee that we are now taking legal action against. We have mentioned in previous releases that unfounded comments and actions were being conducted against the company. This committee does not have the authority to take any actions. In the meantime it is business as usual for Stans and we continue to work with the State Geological Agency to finalize our Licence Agreement, which will be completed by September 30th.
The granting of the Licence Agreement on June 15 was in full compliance with all Kyrgyz laws. The unanimous approval by the 14 member expert panel was a vindication of the progress that Stans has achieved.
Since we acquired the 20 year Mining Licence, there have been several changes of government, and with each change, audits have been conducted on our compliance with Kyrgyz legislation. With each audit, Stans was proven to be in full compliance, and this recent committee recommendation, we feel is baseless. Furthermore, we were not given the opportunity to respond to any of their accusations. This lack of due process and lack of transparency on this committee’s part is the cause for our lawsuit, and we are confident that upon further review by the courts our legal standing will be justified.
Our legal and community out-reach teams in Kyrgyzstan are working diligently to resolve these issues and more information will be provided as it becomes available.
Regards,
David"
http://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?p=0&…
BOY!!! DID THE SHAREHOLDERS GET THE NEWS RELEASE WRONG!!!
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING!
Our email to David:
"Good Morning David,
I suppose you're not surprised to hear from me considering the latest course of events and news releases.
There seems to be major confusion as to exactly what has transpired and just what course of action Stans is taking with respect to these events.
The question is: Did certain factions of K/G government flair up once more, rear it's ugly head, and attempt to initiate negative action or is this a continuing action taken by Stans in response to past events, in the interest of the company's future relations with the country, government and shareholder protection.
As usual I will post you're response on the Stan's board.
Thanks kindly, as usual, for taking the time to respond.
Sincerely Yours, "
David's reply:
"There has been NO decision to revoke our licence. That proposal was put forth by the committee that we are now taking legal action against. We have mentioned in previous releases that unfounded comments and actions were being conducted against the company. This committee does not have the authority to take any actions. In the meantime it is business as usual for Stans and we continue to work with the State Geological Agency to finalize our Licence Agreement, which will be completed by September 30th.
The granting of the Licence Agreement on June 15 was in full compliance with all Kyrgyz laws. The unanimous approval by the 14 member expert panel was a vindication of the progress that Stans has achieved.
Since we acquired the 20 year Mining Licence, there have been several changes of government, and with each change, audits have been conducted on our compliance with Kyrgyz legislation. With each audit, Stans was proven to be in full compliance, and this recent committee recommendation, we feel is baseless. Furthermore, we were not given the opportunity to respond to any of their accusations. This lack of due process and lack of transparency on this committee’s part is the cause for our lawsuit, and we are confident that upon further review by the courts our legal standing will be justified.
Our legal and community out-reach teams in Kyrgyzstan are working diligently to resolve these issues and more information will be provided as it becomes available.
Regards,
David"
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 43.442.879 von goldfinger69 am 31.07.12 19:48:56meinst du wirklich hier steht eine Enteignung an?????
Zum wahrscheinlicher Enteignung von Stans Energy
Die Mafia in Italien hat mehr Stolz als das Pack in KOTZISTAN ....Ich wünsche dem Pack in diesem Land welche Verträge zum Arsch abwischen verwendet, dass die die Weltwirschaft und Investoren auf diese Land in Zukunft scheißen...KEINE INVESTITIONEN IN SO EINEM DRECKSLAND ... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Die Mafia in Italien hat mehr Stolz als das Pack in KOTZISTAN ....Ich wünsche dem Pack in diesem Land welche Verträge zum Arsch abwischen verwendet, dass die die Weltwirschaft und Investoren auf diese Land in Zukunft scheißen...KEINE INVESTITIONEN IN SO EINEM DRECKSLAND ... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sprechen wir es mal deutlich aus:
Ich kann gar nicht soviel essen wie ich kotzen möchte!
Hatte echt gedacht, dass es im August wieder hoch geht, nachdem neulich noch recht positive News kamen.
So schnell kann es gehen....
Ich kann gar nicht soviel essen wie ich kotzen möchte!
Hatte echt gedacht, dass es im August wieder hoch geht, nachdem neulich noch recht positive News kamen.
So schnell kann es gehen....
Sieht eher nach rausdrängen von Stans aus. Da die Lizens ja dann auch wieder neu ausgeschrieben wird erhoffen sich da vielleicht einige Leute einen besseren Fang als Stans, siehe Nachbarrepublik und die Japaner. Den Russen dürfte es egal sein wen sie ihre Technologie dann anbieten bzw. verkaufen. Stans sollte schnellsten ihren Partner präsentieren, wenn man angeblich die Wahl hat vielleicht den bekanntesten und der genügend Geld einbringt auch wenn Stans selbst Abstriche machen muß. Könnte so aber viele in der Regierung überzeugen, dass da was geht und die Lizens gut bei Stans aufgehoben ist. Nervt uns doch schon gewaltig, dass sie nun schon über halbes Jahr an ihrer PFS arbeiten und immer neue Sachen erfinden warum sie nicht fertig wird. Wenn man jede technologische Entwicklung da mit reinarbeiten will können wir da noch lange warten.
Trading Spotlight
Zitat von prallhans: Was lernen wir daraus? Hände weg von den Kack-Ländern. Schon mein 4. Wert im Depot. Wobei ich mich frage, ob Aussitzen bei Stans Sinn macht. Meine Neuinvestments sind nur noch in vermeintlich "sicheren" Ländern. Wobei ich auch Afrika sehr interessant finde. Habe das Gefühl, die sind da noch kundenfreundlicher als z.B. einige Staaten in Südamerika. Daher habe ich auch noch GWG im Depot.
GWG?
Gute Wahl, mein 2/3 Rohstoffdepotschwergwicht.
Puh, schwieriges Wort
Was lernen wir daraus? Hände weg von den Kack-Ländern. Schon mein 4. Wert im Depot. Wobei ich mich frage, ob Aussitzen bei Stans Sinn macht. Meine Neuinvestments sind nur noch in vermeintlich "sicheren" Ländern. Wobei ich auch Afrika sehr interessant finde. Habe das Gefühl, die sind da noch kundenfreundlicher als z.B. einige Staaten in Südamerika. Daher habe ich auch noch GWG im Depot.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 43.438.937 von Krawallo29 am 30.07.12 21:02:05nachwerfen = nachkaufen ? und das in einem Land wo du jetzt weißt das Recht mit Füssen getretten wird ?
Durchsuchen
