checkAd

    Wall-Street-Schreck Robert Khuzami verlässt Börsenaufsicht SEC - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 10.01.13 13:53:42 von
    neuester Beitrag 10.01.13 19:58:22 von
    Beiträge: 4
    ID: 1.178.763
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 458
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.01.13 13:53:42
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      Robert Khuzami jagte vier Jahre lang als Chefermittler der US-Börsenaufsicht SEC die Übeltäter an der Wall Street. Der Jurist krempelte die SEC-Ermittlungsabteilung um und rollte eine Rekordzahl an Fällen auf. Nun hört er auf, einen Nachfolger gibt es noch nicht. (http://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/5077823-wall-stree…)

      Meldung der SEC: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2013/2013-3.htm

      Na hoffentlich kein schlechtes Zeichen ...
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.01.13 14:17:00
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      Sind denn Gründe bekannt, warum er die SEC verlässt? Und wo er hingeht? Mit den Einblicken kann er ja gut bei der Wall Street einen hoch dotierten Beraterjob bekommen. Ist ja nicht unüblich. Oder hat Obama noch einen Job frei?

      Oder wieder zurück zur Deutschen Bank - da kam er ja her (mal so zum Thema Interessenkonflikte).
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.01.13 19:39:45
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Sieht eher aus, als wenn jemand den bock zum gärtner gemacht hat den wolf zum hirtenhund..
      Ich hätte mich übrigens leicht gewundert gewundert, wenn es anders wäre.. den rest meines wissens über die dahinterstehende gemeinschaft behalte ich aus gründen der heutigen "political correctness" für mich....


      By Matt Taibbi
      August 17, 2011 8:00 AM ET
      Pete Gardner/GettyImagine a world in which a man who is repeatedly investigated for a string of serious crimes, but never prosecuted, has his slate wiped clean every time the cops fail to make a case. No more Lifetime channel specials where the murderer is unveiled after police stumble upon past intrigues in some old file – "Hey, chief, didja know this guy had two wives die falling down the stairs?" No more burglary sprees cracked when some sharp cop sees the same name pop up in one too many witness statements. This is a different world, one far friendlier to lawbreakers, where even the suspicion of wrongdoing gets wiped from the record.

      That, it now appears, is exactly how the Securities and Exchange Commission has been treating the Wall Street criminals who cratered the global economy a few years back. For the past two decades, according to a whistle-blower at the SEC who recently came forward to Congress, the agency has been systematically destroying records of its preliminary investigations once they are closed. By whitewashing the files of some of the nation's worst financial criminals, the SEC has kept an entire generation of federal investigators in the dark about past inquiries into insider trading, fraud and market manipulation against companies like Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and AIG. With a few strokes of the keyboard, the evidence gathered during thousands of investigations – "18,000 ... including Madoff," as one high-ranking SEC official put it during a panicked meeting about the destruction – has apparently disappeared forever into the wormhole of history.

      Under a deal the SEC worked out with the National Archives and Records Administration, all of the agency's records – "including case files relating to preliminary investigations" – are supposed to be maintained for at least 25 years. But the SEC, using history-altering practices that for once actually deserve the overused and usually hysterical term "Orwellian," devised an elaborate and possibly illegal system under which staffers were directed to dispose of the documents from any preliminary inquiry that did not receive approval from senior staff to become a full-blown, formal investigation. Amazingly, the wholesale destruction of the cases – known as MUIs, or "Matters Under Inquiry" – was not something done on the sly, in secret. The enforcement division of the SEC even spelled out the procedure in writing, on the commission's internal website. "After you have closed a MUI that has not become an investigation," the site advised staffers, "you should dispose of any documents obtained in connection with the MUI."

      Many of the destroyed files involved companies and individuals who would later play prominent roles in the economic meltdown of 2008. Two MUIs involving con artist Bernie Madoff vanished. So did a 2002 inquiry into financial fraud at Lehman Brothers, as well as a 2005 case of insider trading at the same soon-to-be-bankrupt bank. A 2009 preliminary investigation of insider trading by Goldman Sachs was deleted, along with records for at least three cases involving the infamous hedge fund SAC Capital.

      The widespread destruction of records was brought to the attention of Congress in July, when an SEC attorney named Darcy Flynn decided to blow the whistle. According to Flynn, who was responsible for helping to manage the commission's records, the SEC has been destroying records of preliminary investigations since at least 1993. After he alerted NARA to the problem, Flynn reports, senior staff at the SEC scrambled to hide the commission's improprieties.

      As a federally protected whistle-blower, Flynn is not permitted to speak to the press. But in evidence he presented to the SEC's inspector general and three congressional committees earlier this summer, the 13-year veteran of the agency paints a startling picture of a federal police force that has effectively been conquered by the financial criminals it is charged with investigating. In at least one case, according to Flynn, investigators at the SEC found their desire to bring a case against an influential bank thwarted by senior officials in the enforcement division – whose director turned around and accepted a lucrative job from the very same bank they had been prevented from investigating. In another case, the agency farmed out its inquiry to a private law firm – one hired by the company under investigation. The outside firm, unsurprisingly, concluded that no further investigation of its client was necessary. To complete the bureaucratic laundering process, Flynn says, the SEC dropped the case and destroyed the files.



      Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-coverin…
      Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.01.13 19:58:22
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 44.007.303 von Nannsen am 10.01.13 19:39:45Im dem artikel wird weiter ausführlich über die deutsche bank und die damalige aus börsensicht kriminelle übernahme einer amerikanischen bank berichtet und damit die rolle von breuer und später khuzami im zusammenhang mit der deutschen bank.

      Khuzami gehört nach seriösen medienberichten heute zu einem kreis der 30 mächtigsten finanzmänner. Überflüssig aufzuzählen wer noch, ihr kennt sie alle auch aus ihrem wirken zur rettung griechenkands und europas etc.. gääääähne..


      Quote:

      Bumping a MUI up to a formal investigation is critical, because it enables investigators to pull out the full law-enforcement ass-kicking measures – subpoenas, depositions, everything short of hot pokers and waterboarding. In the Deutsche case, Flynn and other SEC investigators got past the MUI stage and used their powers to collect sworn testimony and documents indicating that plenty of übernahmegespräche indeed had been going on when Breuer spoke to Der Spiegel. Based on the evidence, they sent an "Action Memorandum" to senior SEC staff, formally recommending that the agency press forward and file suit against Deutsche.

      Breuer responded to the threat as big banks like Deutsche often do: He hired a former SEC enforcement director to lobby the agency to back off. The ex-insider, Gary Lynch, launched a creative and inspired defense, producing a linguistic expert who argued that übernahmegespräche only means "advanced stage of discussions." Nevertheless, the request to proceed with the case was approved by several levels of the SEC's staff. All that was needed to move forward was a thumbs-up from the director of enforcement at the time, Richard Walker.

      But then a curious thing happened. On July 10th, 2001, Flynn and the other investigators were informed that Walker was mysteriously recusing himself from the Deutsche case. Two weeks later, on July 23rd, the enforcement division sent a letter to Deutsche that read, "Inquiry in the above-captioned matter has been terminated." The bank was in the clear; the SEC was dropping its fraud investigation. In contradiction to the agency's usual practice, it provided no explanation for its decision to close the case.

      On October 1st of that year, the mystery was solved: Dick Walker was named general counsel of Deutsche. Less than 10 weeks after the SEC shut down its investigation of the bank, the agency's director of enforcement was handed a cushy, high-priced job at Deutsche.

      Deutsche's influence in the case didn't stop there. A few years later, in 2004, Walker hired none other than Robert Khuzami, a young federal prosecutor, to join him at Deutsche. The two would remain at the bank until February 2009, when Khuzami joined the SEC as Flynn's new boss in the enforcement division. When Flynn sent his letter to Khuzami complaining about misbehavior by Walker, he was calling out Khuzami's own mentor.

      The circular nature of the case illustrates the revolving-door dynamic that has become pervasive at the SEC. A recent study by the Project on Government Oversight found that over the past five years, former SEC personnel filed 789 notices disclosing their intent to represent outside companies before the agency – sometimes within days of their having left the SEC. More than half of the disclosures came from the agency's enforcement division, who went to bat for the financial industry four times more often than ex-staffers from other wings of the SEC.



      Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-coverin…
      Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      Wall-Street-Schreck Robert Khuzami verlässt Börsenaufsicht SEC