Nanopierce - 500 Beiträge pro Seite (Seite 7)

[Katzennarr]

@avsa,

ich glaube du hast Recht

Ich Frage mich schon die ganze Zeit,
warum ich wieder ein paar gekauft habe.

[Katzennarr]

He, jetzt sind die 3000 Postings doch noch voll geworden.

Ich hatte mal gesagt,
bevor die 3000 Postings voll sind, iss Nanopierce Pleite.

[frabue3]

totgesagt leben länger

erst kommen die schmerzen - dann kommt die freude oder so!?
kosti

[kaliho]

erst die schmerzen - dann das schmerzensgeld.

ich habe von guter quelle, dass sehr bald gute news kommen.

momentan kaufsignal (meine meinung)

[V51]

(BSNS WIRE) NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. Signs Exclusive Marketing Agreement
With ExypnoTech, GmbH And TagStar-Systems, GmbH
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. Signs Exclusive Marketing Agreement With ExypnoTec
, GmbH And TagStar-Systems, GmbH


Business Editors

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--NPCT--
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., (OTCBB: NPCT) today
announced that it signed an exclusive marketing agreement with
ExypnoTech, GmbH and TagStar Systems, GmbH of Sauerlach, Germany.
NanoPierce plans to create a new wholly owned subsidiary, EXYPNOTECH,
LLC to market and sell RFID (radio frequency identification)
components manufactured by ExypnoTech and marketed by TagStar. The
exclusive marketing rights were obtained for all companies and their
subsidiaries organized or based in both the United States and in any
other countries on the North and South American continents. In
addition, EXYPNOTECH, LLC has the non-exclusive right to develop
customers anywhere else in the world should it choose to expand it
sales and marketing efforts. EXYPNOTECH, LLC can maintain the
exclusivity provided that by September 30, 2005 and thereafter it
achieves annual gross sales of 250,000 Euros from the sale of
ExypnoTech/TagStar RFID products.
G. William Pfeiffer has been tasked with the responsibility for
the Company`s sales and marketing activities in this developing
market.
NanoPierce stated that the marketing agreement was prompted by
recent favorable developments relating to applications of SmartPaper
(TM) which appears to present significant high volume market
opportunities. SmartPaper is a converted RFID product of ExypnoTech.
SmartPaper(TM) is a plain sheet of paper which contains an embedded
transponder (a chip connected to an antenna). Customers using modified
conventional laser or inkjet printers or a smart printer prepared by
ExypnoTech GmbH can create customized smart labels by simultaneously
printing on the paper and using standard read/write devices transmit
data to program the RFID chip. SmartPaper can be used in very high
volume applications but is particularly ideal for producing small
quantities of RFID labels, used and created on demand. SmartPaper(TM)
was developed by ExpynoTech, when it was a wholly owned subsidiary of
NanoPierce. NanoPierce currently owns a 49% interest in ExypnoTech.
Paul H. Metzinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of
NanoPierce said: "NanoPierce has been actively but quietly exploring
market applications for RFID products and recent developments have
revealed some very strong opportunities which we fully intend to
exploit. The Company feels that with the recent developments in the
RFID industry, i.e. the Wal-Mart mandate of the use of RFID starting
in January 2005 and the recent announcement of the Department of
Defense to require certain suppliers to start to use RFID that the
RFID industry and market has begun to generate traction in the United
States."

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. of Denver Colorado, USA, is traded
on the NASDAQ stock market (OTC:BB:NPCT) as well as on the Frankfurt
and Hamburg (OTC:NPI). In addition to the 12 patents it owns,
NanoPierce Technologies has numerous applications pending, others in
preparation, and various intellectual properties related to NanoPierce
Technologies` NCS (NanoPierce Connection System). This advanced system
is designed to provide significant improvement over conventional
electrical and mechanical interconnection methods for high-density
circuit boards, components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor
packaging and electronic systems.
For more information regarding NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.,
visit the Company`s website: www.nanopierce.com.

TagStar Systems, GmbH develops, produces and markets RFID
components such as smart inlays (transponders). TagStar`s product
portfolio is supplemented by read/write devices from selected partner
firms. TagStar aims to be an all-service, single-source supplier for
customers requiring RFID services and solutions.
For more information regarding TagStar Systems, GmbH, visit the
Company`s website: www.tagstar-systems.com.

This announcement contains forward-looking statements about
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., that may involve risks and
uncertainties. Important factors relating to the Company`s operations
could cause results to differ materially from those in forward-looking
statements and further detailed in filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission available at the SEC website (http://www.sec.gov).
All forward-looking statements are based on information available to
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. on the date hereof and NanoPierce
Technologies, Inc., assumes no obligation to update such statements.



KEYWORD: INTERNATIONAL EUROPE COLORADO
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: MANUFACTURING HARDWARE COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS MARKETING AGREEME
TS
SOURCE: NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.


CONTACT INFORMATION:
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
Paul H. Metzinger, 303-592-1010
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
or
TagStar Systems, GmbH
Media Relations, 011-49-8104-64-95-10
Fax: [phone]

*** end of story ***

[colombotaner]

kann das bitte einer übersetzen

Danke

[Boersenkuh]

Babelfish:

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., (OTCBB: NPCT) verkündete heute, daß es eine exklusive Marktvereinbarung mit ExypnoTech, den GmbH und TagStar Systemen unterzeichnete, GmbH von Sauerlach, Deutschland. NanoPierce Pläne, zum einer neuen insgesamt besessenen Tochtergesellschaft, EXYPNOTECH, LLC zu verursachen, um RFID (Hochfrequenzkennzeichnung) die Bestandteile zu vermarkten und zu verkaufen hergestellt von ExypnoTech und von TagStar vermarktet. Die exklusiven Marketing-Rechte wurden für alle Firmen erhalten und ihre Tochtergesellschaften organisierten oder gründeten in beiden Vereinigten Staaten und in allen möglichen anderen Ländern auf den Nord- und südamerikanischen Kontinenten. Zusätzlich hat EXYPNOTECH, LLC das nicht-exklusive Recht, Kunden in der Welt irgendwoanders zu entwickeln, wenn es beschließt, sie zu erweitern Verkäufe und Marketing-Bemühungen. EXYPNOTECH, LLC kann die Exklusivität beibehalten, vorausgesetzt daß bis zum September 30, 2005 und danach es jährliche grobe Verkäufe von 250.000 Euros vom Verkauf ExypnoTech/TagStar RFID der Produkte erzielt. G. William Pfeiffer ist tasked mit der Verantwortlichkeit für die Company`s Verkäufe und die Marketing-Tätigkeiten in diesem sich entwickelnden Markt gewesen. NanoPierce gab an, daß die Marktvereinbarung durch neue vorteilhafte Entwicklungen in bezug auf Anwendungen von SmartPaper (TM) aufgefordert wurde das scheint, bedeutende Marktgelegenheiten des hohen Volumens darzustellen. SmartPaper ist ein umgewandeltes RFID Produkt von ExypnoTech. SmartPaper(TM) ist ein normales Blatt Papier, das einen eingebetteten Transponder enthält (einen Span angeschlossen an eine Antenne). Kunden mit geänderten herkömmlichen Laser oder Tintenstrahldruckern oder ein intelligenter Drucker, der von ExypnoTech GmbH vorbereitet wird, können kundengebundene intelligente Aufkleber verursachen, indem sie gleichzeitig auf dem Papier drucken und mit Standardlese-Schreibvorrichtungen übertragen Sie Daten, um den RFID Span zu programmieren. SmartPaper kann, in den Anwendungen des sehr hohen Volumens verwendet werden aber ist für das Produzieren der kleinen Quantitäten RFID Aufkleber besonders ideal, Bedarfs- verwendet und verursacht. SmartPaper(TM) wurde von ExpynoTech entwickelt, als es eine insgesamt besessene Tochtergesellschaft von NanoPierce war. NanoPierce besitzt z.Z. ein 49% Interesse an ExypnoTech. Paul H. Metzinger, Präsident und Generaldirektor von NanoPierce sagte: " NanoPierce ist aktiv gewesen, aber ruhig erforschende Marktanwendungen für RFID Produkte und Neuentwicklungen haben einige sehr starke Gelegenheiten aufgedeckt, die wir völlig beabsichtigen, auszunutzen. Die Firma glaubt der mit den Neuentwicklungen in der RFID Industrie, d.h. die Wal-Handelszentrum Vollmacht des Gebrauches RFID, das im Januar 2005 und die neue Ansage des Verteidigungsministeriums beginnt, bestimmte Lieferanten zu erfordern zu beginnen, RFID zu verwenden, dem die der RFID Industrie und Markt angefangen hat, Zugkraft im vereinigten States." zu erzeugen;

[kaliho]

ich denke 100% sind da drin.... mal abwarten

[Katzennarr]

Die Newes kommt nicht gut an.

[kaliho]

bei der preisentwicklung der letzten monate braucht man sich nicht zu wundern dass viele die nerven verlieren. die meisten verstehen eben nur bahnhof.

man soll doch billig kaufen!!!!!!!

es kommen noch weitere gute news!

[Katzennarr]

Wollen´s hoffen.

[kaliho]

Market Pulse Announces its AM Special Situation Alerts for Tuesday, June 15, 2004: NPCT, QCOM, ORCL, AMAT!

PrimeZone, Tuesday, June 15, 2004 at 09:15


ATLANTA, Jun 15, 2004 (PRIMEZONE via COMTEX) -- Market-Pulse.com is pleased to introduce our featured stock, NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:NPCT), to the investment community! NanoPierce is poised to become a significant player in the semiconductor/microelectronics industry! NanoPierce just had exciting news out before today`s bell regarding the signing of an exclusive marketing agreement! Investors should take note as they are undervalued! This could be excellent news for investors!

[xenova]

Market Pulse -- Emerging Stocks Alert for Tuesday, June 15, 2004: NPCT: Outstanding Growth Situation!
ATLANTA, June 15, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Market-Pulse.com is pleased to introduce our featured stock, NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:NPCT), to the investment community! NanoPierce is poised to become a significant player in the semiconductor/microelectronics industry! NanoPierce just had excellent news out before today`s opening bell! Watch this stock move! (Quelle:
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT&rea…
:
http://www.market-pulse.com/npctprofile.htm

[MRASTA]

Was will der Künstler uns damit sagen ?

Vertrieb der Produkte der eigenen Anhängsel ? Cool, haben die vielleicht keine Knete dafür ?

Dafür wieder eine neue Firma gründen, warum denn dass nun wieder ?

NanoPierce plans to create a new wholly owned subsidiary, EXYPNOTECH, LLC to market and sell RFID (radio frequency identification) components manufactured by ExypnoTech and marketed by TagStar.



Dieser Satz verlangt besondere Aufmerksamkeit :

SmartPaper can be used in very high volume applications but is particularly ideal for producing small quantities of RFID labels, used and created on demand.

Das ist wohl die Kernaussage. Und wenn ich mich recht erinnere hatte dass auch schon der ex. Doc seinerzeit soweit auf die Reihe gebracht, war nur ein bischen zu teuer, glaube waren so 2.50 $ pro Stück. Und nun, was kostet dass denn jetzt ?

Für individuelle Anwendungen im kleineren Stückbereich OK., keine Frage. Nur, wie groß ist dieser Markt ? Wo bleibt der Druckerhersteller, warum nicht mit einem der großen aus der Branche dass zusammen durchziehen. Das ok. brauchen Sie ja sowieso, wenn Sie an den Druckern rumfummeln. Gewährleistung etc.

Vielleicht auch nur der Versuch, die Meldung von Precisia von vor ein paar Tagen zu kontern, immerhin denkbar. Dafür aber zu schwach.

Komische Meldung, kann damit nicht wirklich was anfangen.
Irgendwer ne Idee, was der Sinn und Zweck der Übung sein könnte ?

mrasta

[kaliho]

so wie ich das verstehe, kann die neue Fa. dann auch ueber LLC direkt produkt verkaufen, wo die GANZEN einnahmen bei NPCT bleiben. warum nicht?? auf diese weise koennen sie einnahmen vorzeigen, waehrend man auf die resultate der tochterfirmen wartet.
waeren keine geschaefte im gespraech, brauchte man diese neue Fa. und dieses abkommen nicht.

ist doch ok und positiv.
hier wird nur negatives geschrieben, wenn meiner meinung nach viel positives passiert.

ich sehe hier nur ein kaufsignal!

[MRASTA]

@kalhio

hier wird nur negatives geschrieben, wenn meiner meinung nach viel positives passiert. ?????

Na, wenn man so in die Vergangenheit schaut, kann man das nun wahrlich nicht so sagen. Da sind doch alle nur veralbert worden, um es mal auf einen einfachen Nenner zu bringen. Da ist man halt mehr als vorsichtig geworden, zumindest ich, wenn Meldungen kommen.

Warum macht Nanopierce das denn nicht selber ?

mrasta

[HaGe1]

TagStar Systems:
Founded October 2003 by a team of seasoned RFID experts (former employees of ExypnoTech and NanoPierce)

15.12.2003:
TagStar has acquired a 51% equity interest in ExypnoTech in exchange for a direct cash investment and a commitment to meet future financing needs

NanoPierce hat also nur einen Vertrag mit eigenen Leuten gemacht! Oder habe ich etwas übersehen oder falsch interpretiert ? Ein echter Auftrag sieht anders aus.

[MRASTA]

@HaGe1

jo, so ist es. Habe ich doch geschrieben : Vertrieb der Produkte der eigenen Anhängsel ?

cu

[Katzennarr]

Iss wohl wieder nichts richtiges.

[Katzennarr]

bid und ask gehen etwas hoch

[Katzennarr]

Ich spiele mit dem Gedanken wieder auszusteigen.
Lieber einen kleinen Verlust als einen großen.

Vielleicht ergeben sich bessere Einstiegskurse.

Naja, bis jetzt nur ein Gedanke.

[MRASTA]

@Rainer

Kopf hoch.

Ja, wenn HP mal sagen würde, he Jungs wir haben hier einen coolen Drucker mit dem könnt Ihr jetzt auch eure eigenen RFID´s machen. Das wäre doch mal was, aber so ? Das ist doch alles kalter Kaffee, schon dutzende male aufgebrüht, wo ist hier der Joke ?

Befürchte, ist nur MHO, dass den beiden Trabanten die Knete so langsam ausgeht und Sie wieder mal ein neues Konstrukt bauen, damit es nicht gleich so auffällt, kann mich aber auch täuschen. Wie schon gesagt, kann mit der Meldung nix richtiges anfangen. Der Sinn und Zweck der Übung liegt für mich im dunkeln. Mach doch mal einer Licht an.

cu

[Katzennarr]

Licht könnten nur die anmachen.

Das werden Sie aber mit Sicherheit nicht tun.

[Katzennarr]

Die 0,17 sind eine Unterstützung.
Wen die fällt, geht´s steil bergab.

[Hynel]

NPCT wird in Kürze der Cash ausgehen und der Gang in den Bankrott ist unvermeidlich.
Dieser OTCBB Wert ist dem Untergang geweiht, Nano ist ja nicht schlecht, aber nicht überall wo Nao drauf steht, ist auch Nano drinn.

NPCT verliert aktuell wieder 2,75% bei 0,175$

hier kanns nur heißen:

RETTE SICH WER KANN !!!

STRONG SELL!

[Rob2303]

hynel

da musst aber noch viel lernen.

[Rob2303]

hynel

kurze klärung, warum ich deine aussage nicht o.k. finde.

nanopierce hat seit börsengang null geschäft gemacht.
jetzt, wo sich verträge zu vermarktung von rfid abzeichnen,
willst du aus diesem wert raus. selbst wenn sich die
vermarktung als nullnummer herausstellt, bleiben noch monate des handelns. die fantasie kommt wieder zurück und
ein ausstiegsfenster wird sich öffnen. wenn du das nicht
abwarten kannst, solltest du lieber keine aktien halten.
man sollte immer ein wenig nachkaufen um in der nähe des geldes zu bleiben. die tradingrange verläuft bis 0,50.

siehe auch icge. 80% in drei wochen.

[Strait1]

Volles Risiko !

Ich habe gerade weitere 1.500 erworben.

[Katzennarr]

Ich bin heute erst mal raus.
Ich denke, dass wir über kurz oder lang die 0,10 in den USA sehen werden.
Meine Grenze waren die 0,17.
Lieber einen kleinen Verlust als einen großen.

[Katzennarr]

Wahrscheinlich gehen die blöden Dinger jetzt wieder hoch, wo ich raus bin.

Ich halte aber an einer klaren Linie fest, dass ist meine Erfahrung die ich mit der Börse gemacht habe.

[MRASTA]

@Rainer

Nobody is perfect. Was hinter den Kulissen läuft ist unklar, wie so oft.

Phantasie bei den Pierces wieder zu erwecken bedarf ein bischen mehr als die letzte Meldung. Hätte eigentlich gedacht, das Nanoierce selber die Vermarktung übernimmt. Dadurch, dass eine neue Firma dafür gegründet wurde, könnte man sich vorstellen, das Paul einen Kandidaten für eine Übernahme im Auge hat und sich den Rücken bei den Pierces dafür freihalten will. Das würde zumindest einen Sinn ergeben.

Schaun wir mal, was die nächste Zeit kommt. Wird man am Volumen sehen können, da immer einige etwas früher was wissen als andere. Nur den richtigen Punkt zu finden, ist ja immer so die Sache.

mrasta

[kaliho]

US$ 0.10 wirst Du meiner meinnung nach nicht sehen. wenn man mal ueberprueft was da alles in den letzten jahren gelaufen ist und wie sich die gegener und shortseller von NPI benehmen, sollte es klar sein dass PM nur noch 100%ige infos im nachhinein herausgibt. er hat ja wohl auch gelernt den mund zu halten, denn in der vergangenheit hat man ihn nur angegriffen. es ist meiner meinung nach erstaunlich wie jetzt doch alles zusammenkommt. es ist mir auch klar dass gleich wieder sehr viele sagen das ist alles mist. wer weiss denn hier was lost ist??? keiner!!

ich denke ich weiss mehr als viele, aber trotzdem weiss ich dass ich nichts weiss.

es bibt bald schmerzensgeld..... erst der schmerz, dann das geld. sich wegen 5cent aufzuregen ist wohl nicht der sinn der sache.

und nur luegner kaufen zum niedrigsten und verkaufen zum hoechsten preis.

abwarten!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MRASTA]

@kaliho

meinste wirklich, dass sich Paul da geändert hat ?

Was meinst Du denn, was das Ganze zu bedeuten hat ?

cu

[kaliho]

Paul war schon immer ok..... er war derjenige der verarscht worden ist. er war immer viel zu ehrlich und hat immer zu viel vom moeglichen geredet. und viele wollten ihm was er erarbeitet hat abjagen. haette ja auch beinahe geklappt. aber jetzt ist keine chance mehr dass sowas passiert.

momentan und naechste woche sind verhandlungen wegen einer aquisition. diesmal wird es klappen.

gedult!!!

[colombotaner]

erst das original, danach die google übersetzung



May 18, 2004 11:31 AM US Eastern Timezone

NanoPierce JV Scimaxx Solutions Announces Bumpless Flip Chip Process

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 18, 2004--NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:NPCT) and Scimaxx Solutions LLC, a NanoPierce Joint Venture, announced today the introduction of a new, proprietary flip chip process that does not require chips to be bumped.


"Bumping is the building up of material on chip bond pads to span the gap between the pads and the substrate and has been an essential part of flip chip technologies," said Dr. Herbert Neuhaus, CEO of Scimaxx Solutions and Executive VP of NanoPierce Technologies. "We have demonstrated that hard, conductive particles can perform the function of the bumps with un-treated, un-bumped chips. Eliminating the need for bumping and any wafer-level or chip-level treatment lowers manufacturing cost and increases productivity without a negative impact on performance or reliability for many important applications."

The bumpless flip chip process is an application of the patented NanoPierce Connection System owned by NanoPierce Technologies and licensed to the Scimaxx JV.

"We call our process PI3 because it is the third generation of the Particle Interconnect technology," continued Dr. Neuhaus. "We have been focused on two key applications: RFID which need the simplest and fastest manufacturing process possible to meet cost targets; and specialized defense applications in which limited chip availability precludes the possibility of bumping. We are now selling this system in limited quantities for evaluation by industry leaders."

Paul Metzinger, CEO of NanoPierce Technologies, added: "This important development is an ideal example of how NanoPierce continues to create shareholder value after the restructuring of last year. Although much leaner, NanoPierce and its JV partners have sustained the capability to serve the industry with radically new and highly competitive technical solutions."

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. of Denver, Colorado, USA, is traded on the NASDAQ stock market (OTCBB:NPCT) as well as on the Frankfurt and Hamburg (OTC:NPI). In addition to the 12 patents it owns, NanoPierce Technologies has numerous applications pending, others in preparation, and various intellectual properties related to NanoPierce Technologies` NCS (NanoPierce Connection System). This advanced system is designed to provide significant improvement over conventional electrical and mechanical interconnection methods for high-density circuit boards, components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor packaging and electronic systems.

Scimaxx Solutions LLC, of Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA, is a joint venture founded in 2003 between NanoPierce Technologies and former employees of NanoPierce Connection Systems, Inc. Scimaxx Solutions pursues three tightly coupled strategic thrusts: (1) marketing of NanoPierce technology and intellectual property, (2) development of turn-key manufacturing solutions through the customization of the NanoPierce IP and other non-proprietary technologies, and finally (3) providing pilot and medium-scale manufacturing services.

This announcement contains forward-looking statements about NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. that may involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors relating to the Company`s operations could cause results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements and further detailed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission available at the SEC website (http://www.sec.gov). All forward-looking statements are based on information available to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. on the date hereof and NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. assumes no obligation to update such statements.

Contacts


NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
Paul H. Metzinger, 303-592-1010
303-592-1054 (fax)
[e-mail]
or
Scimaxx Solutions LLC
Dr. Herbert Neuhaus, 719-638-5930
719-638-5933 (fax)
[e-mail]



Mai 18, 2004 11:31 Morgens US OstTimezone

Lösungen NanoPierce JV Scimaxx Verkündet Schlag-SpancProzeß Bumpless

DENVER -- (business WIRE) -- Mai 18, 2004 -- NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:NPCT) und Lösungs-LLC Scimaxx, eine Joint Venture NanoPierce, heute verkündet der Einleitung eines neuen, eigenen Schlagspanprozesses, der nicht Späne erfordert gestoßen zu werden.


"das Stoßen ist das Aufbauen des Materials auf den Spanbondauflagen zum Überspannen des Abstandes zwischen den Auflagen und dem Substrat und ist ein wesentliches Teil Schlagspantechnologien," gewesen, sagte Dr. Herbert Neuhaus, CEO der Lösungen und des Hauptleiters VP Scimaxx der Technologien NanoPierce. "wir haben, daß stark, leitende Partikel die Funktion der Stösse mit den unbehandelten, un-gestoßenen Spänen durchführen können gezeigt. Das Beseitigen der Notwendigkeit am Stoßen und an jeder möglicher Oblate-Niveau- oder Span-Niveaubehandlung senkt Herstellungskosten und erhöht Produktivität ohne eine negative Auswirkung auf Leistung oder Zuverlässigkeit für viele wichtige Anwendungen.",

Der bumpless Schlagspanprozeß ist eine Anwendung des patentierten Anschlußsystems NanoPierce, das von NanoPierce Technologies besessen wird und zum Scimaxx JV genehmigt ist.

"wir benennen unseren Prozeß PI3, weil es das dritte Erzeugung der Partikelverknüpfungstechnologie ist," anhaltender Dr. Neuhaus. "wir sind auf zwei Schlüsselanwendungen gerichtet worden: RFID, die das einfachste und schnellste Herstellungsverfahren benötigen, das möglich ist, Kostenziele zu treffen; und fachkundige Verteidigunganwendungen, in denen begrenzte Spanverwendbarkeit die Möglichkeit des Stoßens ausschließt. Wir verkaufen jetzt dieses System in begrenzten Quantitäten für Auswertung durch Industrieführer.",

Paul Metzinger, CEO der Technologien NanoPierce, hinzugefügt: nach dem Umstrukturieren des letzten Jahres, "diese wichtige Entwicklung ist ein ideales Beispiel von, wie NanoPierce fortfährt, Aktionärwert zu verursachen. Obgleich viel mager, NanoPierce und seine JV-Partner, haben die Fähigkeit unterstützt, um die Industrie mit den radikal neuen und in hohem Grade konkurrierenden technischen Lösungen zu dienen.",

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. von Denver, Kolorado, USA, wird auf der Börse sowie Nasdaq (OTCBB:NPCT) auf dem Frankfurt und Hamburg (OTC:NPI) gehandelt. Zusätzlich zu den 12 Patenten besitzt es, Technologien NanoPierce hat die zahlreichen Anwendungen, die schwebend sind, andere in der Vorbereitung und das verschiedene geistige Eigentum, das auf NCS der Technologien NanoPierce bezogen wird (Anschlußsystem NanoPierce). Dieses vorgerückte System wird entworfen, um elektrische des bedeutenden Verbesserungsover herkömmliche und mechanische Verbindungsmethoden für mit hoher Dichte Leiterplatten, Bestandteile, Einfaßungen, Stecker, der verpackende und elektronische Systeme Halbleiter zur Verfügung zu stellen.

Lösungs-LLC Scimaxx, der Koloradofrühlinge, Kolorado, USA, ist eine Joint Venture, die 2003 zwischen Technologien NanoPierce gegründet wird und ehemaligen Angestellten von übt Lösungen NanoPierce Connection Systems, Inc. Scimaxx drei fest verbundene strategische Schübe aus: (1) Marketing der Technologie NanoPierce und des geistigen Eigentums, (2) Entwicklung der schlüsselfertigen Herstellungslösungen durch die Kundenbezogenheit des IP NanoPierce und anderer nicht-eigener Technologien und schließlich (3), die Versuchs- und Mittelskalaherstellungsdienstleistungen zur Verfügung stellend.

Diese Ansage enthält das Vorwärts-Schauen von Aussagen über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., das Gefahren und Ungewißheiten mit einbeziehen kann. Die wichtigen Faktoren in bezug auf sind die Betriebe der Firma konnten Resultate veranlassen, sich von denen in Vorwärts-schauenden Aussagen und in weiterem ausführlichem in den Archivierungen mit den Aktien und der Austauschkommission materiell zu unterscheiden, die am sek-website (http://www.sec.gov ) vorhanden sind. Alle Vorwärts-schauenden Aussagen basieren auf den Informationen, die für NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. auf dem Datum hiervon vorhanden sind und NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. nimmt keine Verpflichtung an, solche Aussagen zu aktualisieren.

Kontakte


Technologien NanoPierce, Inc..
Paul H. Metzinger, 303-592-1010
303-592-1054 (Telefax)
[e-mail]
oder
Lösungs-LLC Scimaxx
Dr. Herbert Neuhaus, 719-638-5930
719-638-5933 (Telefax)
[e-mail]



colombo

[colombotaner]

ich sehe gerade die nachricht ist vom 18.MAI , doch nicht so aktuell. ist schon halt spät.
vielleicht kann sie der eine oder andere doch noch gebrauchen.

colombo

[MRASTA]

@colombotaner

was für Name, trag es mit Fassung, ist mir auch schon passiert.


@Kahlio

so, so, wo warst Du denn die letzten Jahre ?

Ich gestehe Paul sogar zu, dass er vieles, nicht alles, Ernst gemeint hat. Nur, bitte, man kann nicht mehrere Ligen auf einmal überspringen wollen. Denn dabei tritt man sehr vielen potenten Firmen auf die Füsse. Und das kreide ich Paul zu 100% an. Da hat er auf keinen gehört und stur versucht sein Ding durchzuziehen. Als es zu Protesten kam war es leider schon zu spät. Dabei hat er Nanopierce vierkant an die Wand gefahren. Das ist meine persönliche Meinung dazu.

Gut, es mag auch sein, dass hier dunkle Machenschafften den Kurs bewußt manipuliert haben. Ist genauso unbelegt wie alles andere. Nur man muss sich immer überlegen, dass es auch noch genügend andere Firmen gibt, die dann trotzdem oder gerade deswegen zugeschlagen hätten. Hat aber keiner, und dass ist doch verwunderlich, oder ?

Also Paule so darzustellen, nach allem was gelaufen ist, kann nicht Dein Ernst sein, ist schon so eine Sache für sich. Vielleicht war er auch einfach nicht der richtige, aber auch dass hätte man erkennen müssen. Auf der Strecke sind nur viele Anleger geblieben und das ist Fakt und denen ist es völlig schnuppe warum es so gekommen ist. Alles andere können Außenstehende nur bedingt beurteilen.

Um da wieder vertrauen aufzubauen bedarf es eben schon einiger Fakten und nicht wilder Zahlen, dass hatten wir alles schon. Mag sein, dass sich einiges geändert hat, kann ich aber noch nicht erkennen.

Für mich sieht es nach was ganz anderem aus, würde mich freuen wenn ich mich täuschen würde, warten wir es ab.

cu

[MRASTA]

Kleiner Nachtrag zu dem Geschehen zur Zeit.

Habe mal wieder einen Blick auf das USA Board getan und Geoff hat anscheinend mit Paul gesprochen (Telefon). Danach bekomme ich mindestens den W : O Hellseherpreis. Kleiner Scherz.

Kurz zumsammengefaßt, kann sich ja jeder selber durchlesen, sind wohl zwei Übernahmekanditanten im Gespräch. Desweiteren soll ein Druckerhersteller Interessese an der RFID Geschichte (Smart Paper) gezeigt haben und es wurden diverse Prototypen hergestellt. (Nachtigal ik hör Dir trapsen) Wer dass wohl ist ?

Die Frage die nach wie vor im Raume stehen bleibt ist, mit welchem Umsatz rechnet man ?

Weiter soll man noch mit 8 bis 9 Firmen in irgendwelchen Diskussionen stehen.

Somit ist erstmal klar, dass der Kurs gedeckelt ist. Zumindest zur Zeit.

Völlig offen ist aber die Frage, ob die Optionen zu 0..25 eingelöst werden. Macht eigentlich bei dem derzeitigen Kurs 0,0 Sinn. Es bleibt somit spannend, was die nächste Zeit passiert. Eine Übernahme einer anderen Firma scheint aber ziemlich nahe zu sein. Und was die Druckerfirma XYZ (wollen ja hier keine Namen nennen ) darauß macht, bleibt abzuwarten.

cu

[Katzennarr]

@Mrasta

Tja, genau der richtige Punkt.
Manchmal klappt es ganz gut und manchmal eben nicht.

Bei der Hypo bin ich zu 13,13 rein. Da hat es ganz gut geklappt.
Mal sehen wann ich wieder aussteige. Ich denke, dass die Kurslücke über 15,00 geschlossen wird.
Sollte sich an den Fakten nichts ändern, gehe ich wahrscheinlich zu 15,50 wieder raus.

Ich fahre jetzt besser, wo ich mir klare Limits setzte. Bei Nanopierce bin ich bei 0,21 Dollar rein. Stop Loss war für mich die 0,17 Dollar.
Schafft es Nanopierce am Montag nicht auf die 0,17 zu kommen, gibt es einen schnellen Abstieg gegen die 0,10 Dollar.

Alles andere wäre für mich Augenwischerei.
Ich habe zu oft den Fehler gemacht, dass ich mir den NOCH rechzeitigen Austieg, durch froh Reden vermasselt habe.

Bei Nanopierce war ich mal für einen Wimpernschlag 300% im Plus.
Beim zerfall hatte ich mich durch durchhalte Parolen nicht zum aussteigen bringen können.
Das Ende vom Lied war, dass ich mit Minus raus bin.
Das Minus war aber immer noch um vieles kleiner, als das Minus, wenn ich sie immer noch hätte.

Also, was habe ich gelernt.

Mich nicht in eine Aktie verlieben, klare Limits setzten.

Gruß
Rainer

[Katzennarr]

@Kahlio

5 cent sind 5 cent, bei einen Kurs von 17 cent ist das viel.

Bei npct brauch ich nicht viel zu überprüfen.
Ich sage lieber nicht was ich Denke.

@mrasta

Zu deinem Nachtrag

Das was bei diesen persönlichen Gesprächen mit Nanopierce- Verantwortlichen gesagt wird, ist eine Sache für sich.
Ich hatte auch schon mal E-mail Kontakt mit Michael@nanopierce.
Leider ist von Paul schon zu oft und zu viel gesagt worden.

Ich warte jetzt erst mal ab.

Verpasse ich den Zug nach oben, dann ist es eben so.
Es gibt genug andere Aktien.
Z.B. habe ich noch die Spaze im Auge, bei nächster Gelegenheit machen die wieder einen Satz nach oben und wenn es nur dazu dient, dass ein paar Verantwortliche ihre Aktien besser verkaufen können. Beim nächsten Hype verkaufe ich meine eben auch.

[kaliho]

@Katzenn..

jeder macht was e denkt ist richtig. nur sollte man keine geruechte in gang setzen oder ueber leute schimpfen, nur weil andere einiges behaupten.

was ich sage ist alles nur meine meinung.

abwarten

[Katzennarr]

Null Problemo kaliho

ich sage ja auch nur meine Meinung.

In Punkto Gerüchte meinst du wohl nicht mich.
Ich habe hier gar nichts in Gang gesetzt.

[stevemann]

die lunte brennt bereits uns wird die bombe bald erreichen...............................

[Strait1]

@stevemann

Ist das ein Rätsel ?

[Strait1]

ASK steigt !

[Katzennarr]

Sollten sich die 0,17 wieder erwarten stabilisieren, kann ich immer noch rein.

Sicher ist sicher.

[MRASTA]

jo, jo

irgendwas wird kommen, ist doch logo. Ob kali nun recht oder nicht wird man sehen, die 0.17 scheinen aber zu halten. Ist ja auch egal ob 0.18 oder 0.17, scheint so eine Art Bodenbildung zu sein, hatte ich ja schon vor einiger Zeit geschrieben.

@Rainer

ich habe mit M. nicht nur per e-mail Kontakt gehabt. Hat mir zwar nur bedingt geholfen, da er immer zur Firma stand, nur ich bin in der Branche einigermaßen zu Hause, so das ich auch zwischen den Zeilen lesen konnte. Hat mich vor einem Totalverlust bewahrt. Aber sind noch immer ein paar Piercen Leichen im Keller, darum denke ich mal über einen Nachkauf nach, wenn auch nur Hype mässig.

Ist aber zur Zeit ein Tanz ohne bekannte Partnerin, mal sehen wie diese aussehen wird.

cu

[Hackertom1]

@Mrasta


ne oder, du hier wieder???


@Kaliho

also diesen oberbetrüger metzinger noch als unschuldslamm hinzustellen ist noch dreister als es dieser metzinger die ganze zeit war. unglaublich. ich hoffe du meinst den scheiß nicht ernst den du da schreibst. wäre sehr bedenklich in meinen augen.


@Strait

sieh mal an. diese aktie findest du also attraktiv?? aber über Nettel ziehst du her?? vergleichen wir doch mal die beiden dinger.

Nanopierce hat jetzt bald 180 millionen aktien draußen!!! zumindest wenn die die ganze finanzierung ausnutzen. jetzt sind im moment schon über 100 millionen ausständig.

Nettel hat nicht mal 6 millionen draußen, und will nach eigenen angaben 40% zurückkaufen über die nächsten monate.

Nanopierce hat es in 5 jahren nicht geschafft umsätze zu schreiben. die haben praktisch NULL umsätze!!!! Nettel hat erst seit einem jahr ein neues management und ist komplett neu aufgestellt worden. die haben in diesem einen jahr die umsätze um über 1000% gesteigert.

Nanopierce hat eine technologie die vor 5 jahren der große hoffnungsträger war und seitdem nicht EINEN EINZIGEN käufer gefunden hat. also auf deutsch keinen interessierts.

Nettel hat 7 oder 8 eigenständige geschäftsfelder, darunter sehr zukunftsträchtige geschäftsfelder.


und jetzt sag du mir welche aktie ich kaufen soll.....



Hack (der sicher ist das Strait von beiden aktien null hintergrundwissen besitzt. aber immer schön nen blödsinnn reden in diversen threads.....)

[Strait1]

Hallo hack...,

ich muß mich bestimmt nicht rechtfertigen warum ich NPCT Shares halte, aber dennoch einige Sätze.

Der finanzielle Hintergrund von beiden Firmen ist mir bekannt. Ich erkundige mich bevor ich Shares kaufe.

Zu NTTL ( ganz kurz, weil gehört hier nicht hin ):

VOIP --> tot, zu teuer, es versuchen schon andere seit Jahren hier Fuß zu fassen. ( Ich habe übrigens beruflich damit zu tun ). Die anderen Geschäftsfelder von NTTL mögen ja ok sein, aber wo bleiben die GEWINNE ?
Die Threads hier zu NTTL sind absolut niveaulos, dies verleitet mich schonmal dazu genauso dort zu antworten.

NPCT, mein lieber hack..., ist ein reiner Zock. Und ich denke ein guter. Die Drucktechnik würde RFID´s total preiswert machen. Somit ist dann mit einem Boom zu rechnen. Selbst ALDI musste auf Scanner umrüsten, also werden RFID´s auch dort bald einen Siegeszug halten. Wenn dies mit Hilfe der NPCT Technik geschieht, dann kann ich die Bestellung für mein neues Auto abschicken.

Bye
S.

[kaliho]

@Hack

wir kaufen hier die zukunft. du scheinst verbittert zu sein und egal was man sagt, bei die ist alles was mit NPCT zu tun hat mist.

meiner meinung nach wirst du dich noch wundern. PM ist KEIN gangster, nur leute die so wie du reden wollen diesen eindruck verbreiten. eine neue technologie hat viele gegner, auch wenn alles funktioniert. besonders grosse firmen stellen erst um, wenn sie absolut muessen und die sache bewertet ist.

wer macht da den anfang????????? und wann??????? und wie kann man als NPCT solange aushalten? das war das problem das meiner meinung nach bald geloest wird. deshalb kann es immer noch einige zeit dauern, aber ich denke wir hoeren bald mehr gute news.

es soll jeder machen was er will, ich wuerde NIE eine fa. oder einen CEO schlecht machen, auch wenn es nicht so geklappt hat wie man wollte.

abwarten!!!!!!!!!

[Hackertom1]

@Kaliho

abwarten???

wer von uns beiden ist denn seit 4 jahren in NPCT investiert?? bzw. war 4 jahre lang investiert??? ich schon bis vor ein paar monaten.

NPCT muß aber langsam gas geben, mit 200 millionen aktien draußen müssen ordentliche gewinne sprudeln das die aktie jemals wieder auf 30 cents steht....

und übrigens, wenn du einen größeren betrüger als Metzinger findest, geb ich dir einen aus. oder soll ich dir mal diverse aussagen vom CEO aus den letzten jahren zeigen. ich hab auch aussagen von mann zu mann persönlich bekommen von Metzinger, als ich bei NPCT war. im nachhinein alles ganz ganz dreiste lügen. soviel dazu.



@Strait

hier gehts nicht ums rechtfertigen. natürlich mußt du dich nicht rechtfertigen warum du NPCT shares hältst. du kannst dir wahrscheinlich nicht vorstellen wie egal mir das ist was du für aktien hast.

es geht nur darum drüber zu diskutieren warum man ne aktie schlecht findet die objektiv zig fach besser dasteht, die in einem jahr 100 mal mehr auf die beine gestellt hat als NPCT in 5 jahren. ja, das sind nun mal fakten. und mit fakten diskutiert man doch oder??

du frägst wo bleiben denn die gewinne bei Nettel,
und bist gleichzeitig in NPCT investiert die seit 5 jahren keinen cent UMSATZ erzielen konnten??

sorry, aber das muß man nicht verstehen oder????? weißt du überhaupt wie schnell Nettel profitabel sein könnte bei einer minimalen umsatzsteigerung?? weißt du wie weit weg NPCT von dem ist??????? ich glaub einfach immer noch das du null background wissen hast über diese firmen. natürlich kann immer alles bei beiden firmen passieren. aber wer objektiv 100 mal attraktiver als investment ist, ist glaub ich auch klar oder?? ich schreib das eigentlich nur weil ich nicht glauben kann das jemand der jeden tag stundenlang auf Nettel rumhackt wie schlecht und windig doch diese aktie und diese firma ist, dann in NPCT investiert ist. das passt halt nun mal überhaupt nicht zusammen.

und was das niveau angeht. find ich auch beängstigend bei Nettel, aber du wirst wenig hier auf w.o. finden wo das niveau besser ist. hier sind nun mal 90% pfosten. so isses halt nun mal. ich hab mich auch schon adaptiert.....


Hack

[avsa]

Du hast volkommen recht ich denke auch dass beim nanopierce wieder nach oben steigt glaube ich.....

[tntxrxwelle]

@ Mrasta Hackertom

Aaaaahhh, die NPCT-Jünger der ersten Generation sind wieder beisammen ;-)))))))

Immer noch am predigen ;-)? Hier ist doch Hopfen und Malz
längst verloren. Sobald Geld fließt, fließt das überall hin, nur nicht zur Holdingmutter.

Ich erinnere nur mal daran, dass das Zeug in der Chipindustrie eingesetzt werden sollte. Der Milliardenmarkt. Was war ? Nixe.

Dieser Papier-Rfid-Labelkram erscheint mir als identische
Seifenblase, weil sich die großen Jungs doch nicht von so einem gestrauchelten Unternehmen die Butter vom Brot nehmen lassen.

cu

[Katzennarr]

Hackertom1

tntxrxwelle


Schön wieder etwas von euch zu hören.

[Katzennarr]

Da kommt ja richtig Stimmung in die Bude.

[Hackertom1]

@tntxrxwelle


hallo. nett wieder was von dir zu hören.

das was du sagst, dem stimm ich voll zu. ich hab gott sei dank den großteil meiner shares zu über 50 cents rausgehauen beim letzten hype. (bin im nachhinein sogar sehr stolz das ich mich von diesem dreck endlich getrennt hab) warum dieser letzte hype so heftig und so lange war, weiß bis heute niemand. hatte aber sicher nur shortie gründe.

bin schon seit längerer zeit NPCT-los in meinen aktienbständen. und schlaf damit um einiges besser. hab durch den hype gar nicht mal so viel liegen gelassen.

jetzt werden halt wieder neue leute von metzinger ausgenommen, diesem betrüger. naja, soll halt so sein.


Hack

[kaliho]

warum leute denen die fa. nicht gefaellt und welche die aktien verkauft haben immer wieder auftauchen um den gegenwaertigen aktionaeren zu predigen verstehe ich wirklich nicht.

wie schon gesagt, ich schaue in die zukunft, nicht zurueck!!

ich sehe hier nur grosses potential.

abwarten, wir werden sehen wer recht hat!!!

[Katzennarr]

Wie gesagt,

zur Zeit taugt npct höchstens zum Zocken.

Funtamental iss da gähnende Leere.

Um Geld anzulegen nicht geeignet.

[Rob2303]

katzennarr
genau, anlegen sollen die leute, wenn der
kurs wieder über 2 dollar steht.

[kaliho]

@Katze... welche infos hast du um zu sagen da ist gaehnende leere???

ich behaupte genau das gegenteil. momentan wid da viel verhandelt und gute news kommt bestimmt.

man soll doch billig kaufen und teuer verkaufen!
erst muss man mal billig kaufen!

[Katzennarr]

Meine Info´s sind das jahrelange Leben mit npct.

[ehrenwort]

@ kaliho:

Nur mal so am Rande: wer bei NanoPierce ist denn eigentlich noch übrig zum Verhandeln?!?

[kaliho]

@ehrenwort

so eine frage kann ich leider nicht ernst nehmen. als investor sollte man sich besser auskennen oder nicht investiert sein.

[Strait1]

In Frankfurt wurden die 0,15 € bezahlt.

Was für Zeiten, daß ich mich über so was freuen kann.

Bye
S.

[avsa]

WARTE NOCH AB NOCH 4 WOCHEN DANN KANST DU MIT 45 CENT VERKAUFEN GUTE QUELLE

[Strait1]

Glaskugel ?

[wallstreetcrash]

@avsa----Deine Quellen möcht ich sehn

[Wunram]

#3065

eher LSD

[Katzennarr]

LSD iss gut

[ehrenwort]

@ kaliho:

Ich denke, dass ich besser mitreden kann als viele hier. Ich kenne den Laden ganz gut, glaube mir Gerade Du bist ja wohl erst seit ein paar Wochen dabei.

Wer soll denn nun bei NanoPierce die Verträge unterschreiben? Ist doch keiner mehr an Board: Die deutschen machen ihr eigenes Ding (meinst Du im Ernst, dass die jemals Gewinne an NanoPierce abführen???), und das leider ohne Dr. Wernle (der war der einzige Lichtblick!). Dr. Neuhaus hat noch nie was geschafft (schau Dir mal den Lebenslauf an!) und sitzt mit Scimaxx ja wohl am Katzentisch. Hat der eigentlich noch Mitarbeiter? Ja und Metzinger ist ein netter Kerl, dem aber ziemlich viel Profil fehlt. Mit nem Manager hat das wenig zu tun. Wer nimmt den denn ernst?

Gebt lieber Eure insvestiertes Geld mir. Ich kaufe dann die Technologie und bring sie nach vorne! Das ist kein Scherz...

Und darauf gebe ich Dir mein
EHRENWORT

[ROAR]

Warum kommt eigentlich keiner auf die Idee daß alles nur ein Joke ist ?
Wahrscheinlich sind alle Namen, Patenten, Gerichtsgeschichten reine Erfindungen von Market Makers, die sich ein Späßchen erlauben (auf Kosten von deutschen Anlegern)mit einem Pennystock wie mit vielen anderen auch.
NPCT ist eine OTC-Aktie die ansonsten nur IN DEUTSCHLAND gehandelt wird.
Wenn einer von Agoracom eine Webadresse gibt, hat er sie selber oder seine Kumpeln gebastelt.
Alles unkontrollierbar !
Heutzutage ist Betrug dank Internet noch einfacher !

[Katzennarr]

@ROAR ,
interessante Meinung finde ich.
Zum Teil gar nicht so abwegig.

[Katzennarr]

Der Kurs bricht wie erwartet durch.
Es wird wohl zügig nach unten gehen.

[kaliho]

PM Interview

http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/profiles/NanoPierceTechnol…

[Strait1]

Ich habe keinen RealPlayer installiert.
Um was geht es im Interview ?

[frabue3]

gegen den strom schwimmen




NanoPierce Technologies, Inc
(OTC: NPCT)



Interview With:
Paul H. Metzinger
President and CEO
Dated July 1, 2004
Click here if you don`t hear audio
Download Real Player For Free

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., of Denver Colorado, USA, is traded on the Nasdaq stock market (OTC: BB: NPCT) as well as on the Frankfurt and Hamburg exchanges (OTC: NPI). In addition to the patents it owns, NanoPierce Technologies has numerous applications pending, others in preparation, and various intellectual properties related to NanoPierce Technologies` NCS™ (NanoPierce Connection System). This advanced system is designed to provide significant improvement over conventional electrical and mechanical interconnection methods for high-density circuit boards, components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor packaging and electronic systems.

Company Websites

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
Reproduction in part or in whole is strictly forbidden, except by written consent. Linking to Interviews is prohibited without express written permission of the publisher. This is not a solicitation to buy or sell securities. Information in this Article, or Interview contains forward looking statements which involves risks and uncertainties. Actual results can differ from those discussed herein. Information contained here has not been independently verified for completeness, or accuracy and is not meant to offer a complete analysis of the companies financial condition Disclosure in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 1933 Act Rule 17b: The company has purchased from Wall Street Reporter Magazine, Inc. and or its affiliates, for our financial media program which usually includes the following: re-publication of this interview/article in Wall Street Reporter Magazine, hardcopy reprints of interview, server hosting of audio content, and related graphics/programming services on wallstreetreporter.com, and other media services. If payment has been issued in shares of stock of the Company so retaining the services, Wall Street Reporter Magazine will liquidate said stock when they deem it appropriate to do so. Such liquidation may have a negative impact on the securities of the Company so being sold.

TERMS OF USAGE
Use of this site is covered under the following disclaimer, terms, and conditions. Usage of this site means you, the site visitor, agreed to the following: Content contained herein includes facts, views, opinions and recommendations of individuals and organizations deemed of interest. WallStreetReporter.com does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of, or otherwise endorse, these views, opinions or recommendations, give investment advice, or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. RealAudio Interviews are done without compensation or payment of any kind, by the interviewee / organization. However, companies do pay to have a text version of the interview published online as part of a paid media program. In Compliance with SEC Rule 17B all compensation is disclosed at the bottom of the interview page (in the case of old interviews, by clicking the Important Notice link). Quote or other Data may be delayed as specified by the Exchanges or Sources. WallStreetReporter.com furnishes this information without responsibility for accuracy and it is accepted by the site visitor on the condition that error in transmission or omissions shall not be made the basis for any claim, demand or cause for action against WallStreetReporter.com or any of its Information Providers. WallStreetReporter.com believes its content to be reliable, but accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. The site visitor agrees not to alter the presentation, reproduce, retransmit, disseminate, sell, distribute, publish, broadcast, circulate or commercially exploit the information in any manner without the express written consent of WallStreetReporter.com; nor to use the Information for any unlawful purpose. WallStreetReporter.com may point to other sites that may of be of interest to the site visitor but for which WallStreetReporter.com has no responsibility and only provides this as a service to the site visitor.

DISCLAIMER
Content contained herein includes facts, views, opinions and recommendations of individuals and organizations deemed of interest. WallStreetReporter.com does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of, or otherwise endorse, these views, opinions or recommendations, give investment advice, or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. RealAudio Interviews are done without compensation or payment of any kind, by the interviewee / organization. However, companies do pay to have a text version of the interview published online as part of a paid media program. In Compliance with SEC Rule 17B all compensation is disclosed at the bottom of the interview page.

IMPORTANT NOTICE
All interviews are copyright-protected intellectual property of Wall Street Reporter Magazine, Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part is strictly forbidden without written permission of the publisher. An express written license is required before linking to any interview or using any of this material in any way for reproduction in print or on another website or media without a license from the Wall Street Reporter Magazine

Wall Street Reporter Magazine, Inc. All Rights Reserved.©1997-2004
Back to Topp

[ehrenwort]

Das Interview ist echt witzig: Paul Metzinger, der absolute "Anti-Technologe", macht eine Vorlesung zum Thema Nanotechnologie, einem Bereich, in dem NanoPierce ja nie selber unterwegs was. Wer soll eigentlich die 2 im Fokus stehenden Nano-Übernahmekandidaten managen, betriebswirtschaftlich und technologisch? Wenn die Firmen so toll sind, warum kauft sie dann kein anderer? Und Metzinger findet das Management so super, die gleichen Gurken wie vor 5 Jahren! Wie sollen die das bloß packen? Ziemlich viele Fragen. Ist das noch witzig? Nein, das ist eher zum heulen (für jeden Top-Manager einer)

[Strait1]

Also was jetzt ?

NPCT wird übernommen, oder wie ?

[Katzennarr]

Übernahme???
Ne, daran Glaube ich nicht.

[libertyjean]

von einer Übernahme war niemals die Rede !
Vielmehr möchte sich Nanopierce an andere Firmen und zwar Nanotechnologie- Firmen beteiligen.
Vielleicht strebt NPCT, eine Art Beteiligungsfirma zu werden, wie einst Augusta vom deutschen Neuen Markt.

[libertyjean]

Vielleicht sieht die Zukunft von Nanopierce so aus:



Die Augusta Technologie AG wurde im Jahre 1991 unter dem Namen Augusta Beteiligungs AG mit Sitz in München gegründet, später dann wurde der Firmensitz in die Finanzmetropole Frankfurt verlegt. Das Unternehmen hat sich den Erwerb von Mehrheitsbeteiligungen an mittelständischen, wachstumsstarken und profitablen Technologiefirmen zum Hauptgeschäftszweck gemacht, um diese anschließend durch Synergieeffekte, Austausch von Know-how und Stärkung der Finanzkraft in ihrem Wachstum zu unterstützen und später dann an die Börse zu bringen. Die Akquisitionsstrategie der Augusta AG zielt in erster Linie auf den Erwerb von Unternehmen ab, die eine führende Marktstellung in stark wachsenden Nischenmärkten des Hightechsektors innehaben, die mittelständisch ausgerichtet sind und zudem über eine überdurchschnittliche Ertragsstärke verfügen sowie ihre Wachstums- und Ertragsstärke schon dauerhaft unter Beweis gestellt haben. Hierbei handelt es sich zumeist um Unternehmen aus den Bereichen Software, Systemtechnik, Sensorik und Kommunikations-Technologie.

[libertyjean]

Transcript of Paul Metzinger’s CEOCast Interview on 6/30/2004
From Kknightmcc
PostID 340985 On Friday, July 02, 2004 (EST) at 11:38:43 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcript of Paul Metzinger’s CEOCast Interview on 6/30/2004

Michael Wachs: Good day, this is Michael Wachs of CEOCast. I’m here today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., a company that trades over the counter under the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that seeks to further advance its promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast today.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you, Michael, it’s always a privilege.

Michael Wachs: If you could begin with an overview of the company and then we’ll get into the technology in greater detail.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, just a general overview from a financial standpoint. I just want to inform our shareholders as well as our prospective investing public that we are in excellent financial condition. We have no debt. We are very, very liquid at the current time as a result of the $14.5 million financing we completed in January. Those investors have enabled us to go out and start concentrating on the redirection of the company, the transformation of the company, into new commercial opportunities.

Michael Wachs: Let’s start, if we could, with in fact, the technology itself. There are many nanotechnologies out there. How are you different?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we are concentrating on diversifying the company now. In addition to our existing intellectual portfolio, that everybody’s aware of, which relates to the NanoPierce connection system microtechnology, we have decided to expand the basis, the intellectual and commercial basis, of the company by going after potential acquisitions that are in the true nanotechnology sector. We are concentrating our selection, our due diligence and out concentration, on companies that are in the nanotechnology materials sector, and at the current time, after spending the better part of several months looking at multiple opportunities, we have essentially now narrowed our potential prospective acquired candidates down to two companies that are very, very strong and we are concentrating significantly on trying to convince them to become associated in some form, probably a direct acquisition with NanoPierce Technologies.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what about existing operations? How do those fit in?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we look at it as an enhancement of our existing operations. Currently existing operations are fairly narrow and very focused at the current time. We are concentrating almost exclusively on the manufacturing and selling of what we call smart labels, which are an antenna connected to a chip that are then put into a substrate which creates a smart label, and as you know a smart label is an item that can be, the chip can be, read and wrote to and information can be put on that, and then that is attached to an item to be identified.

We are, at the current time, extremely pleased as well as encouraged by recent developments that we have developed successfully for on of the world’s largest printer companies to be able to take our other product, Smart paper(TM), which is a chip connected to an antenna on an ordinary piece of paper that’s got an adhesive background, and by running that through a standard, and I say standard modified LaserJet printer we can both print the paper label as well as read/write to the chip. And whenever you then want to tag something you merely peel this label off and attach it to whatever you want. It has been successfully demonstrated publically to the satisfaction of many cognitiates in the industry and it’s impressive. We expect some very significant developments for that application.

Michael Wachs: What about now the steps to commercialize? What do you need to do?

Paul Metzinger: Well, to commercialize the application, the Smartpaper(TM) application, I just talked about, we recently incorporated a new wholly owned subsidiary of NanoPierce called ExypnoTech LLC. It’s got the exclusive marketing rights for the RFID components and products produced by ExypnoTech GmbH which is a company in Germany we own 49% of. We incorporated that new subsidiary for the express purpose of refining and developing the further applications of Smartpaper(TM) with that large printer company as well as one of the other large players in the industry, not a printer company, but well known to dominate the smart label industry for library applications. I am not free to identify it at the current time, but we are in active discussions with that company. So that area of activity of NanoPierce, which is based on our old technology, we are still very vigorously pursuing at the current time.

Michael Wachs: As you now look at the prospects gong forward, you mention these acquisitions, are there particular areas, Paul, that would be well suited?

Paul Metzinger: Yes, in fact both of these companies are exceptionally strong. One of them has a patented technology, well both of them have patented technologies, but the one in particular has a very unique technology that we think has significant implications for the nanotechnology area. They literally are able to refine materials down to one or more atoms, encapsulate those atoms, which allows them to be almost indefinitely stored and shipped without those atomic elements conglomerating, what they call coming back together. When you get ready to use it, you can use it at room temperature. We believe it to be a very significant improvement over anything that’s out there in the pure nanotechnology materials sector.

The other company is very, very strong. In fact, it’s exceptionally strong. The one we really would like to pursue. They are staffed with excellent management, have a full product line that can be applied in materials, whether it applies to the bio-medical industry, the organic industry, or pure metals and polymers. Better than strong. They do have sales. They do have revenues. We expect them to break into profitability this year. That would probably be the first such company like that in the United States that we are aware of.

In fact, we are represented in that connection by a very capable investment banking firm and at the current time we are assessing carefully now both of those companies, and, hopefully, we will be able to lead to a successful conclusion of those discussions for acquisition purposes.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what should investors look for in the coming quarters in terms of key developments?


Paul Metzinger: If we are successful in concluding terms and conditions on the acquisitions there will be major developments to be announced about those acquisitions in the nanotechnology sector.

If the further progress with this major printer company continues, and it is continuing, because we are now going into phases two and three of the program, we would anticipate that, that could have very substantial newsworthy developments for our shareholders leading to revenues and bottom line profitability. That’s someways out there yet, but the near term likelihood of revenues from these applications, I believe, is very substantial of likelihood to occur.

Michael Wachs: I’ve been speaking today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. a company that trades over-the-counter on the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that is now poised as to add to its portfolio of promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you Michael, I always appreciate the opportunity to talk with you.

END OF INTERVIEW

[libertyjean]

Transcript of Paul Metzinger’s CEOCast Interview on 6/30/2004
From Kknightmcc
PostID 340985 On Friday, July 02, 2004 (EST) at 11:38:43 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcript of Paul Metzinger’s CEOCast Interview on 6/30/2004

Michael Wachs: Good day, this is Michael Wachs of CEOCast. I’m here today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., a company that trades over the counter under the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that seeks to further advance its promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast today.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you, Michael, it’s always a privilege.

Michael Wachs: If you could begin with an overview of the company and then we’ll get into the technology in greater detail.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, just a general overview from a financial standpoint. I just want to inform our shareholders as well as our prospective investing public that we are in excellent financial condition. We have no debt. We are very, very liquid at the current time as a result of the $14.5 million financing we completed in January. Those investors have enabled us to go out and start concentrating on the redirection of the company, the transformation of the company, into new commercial opportunities.

Michael Wachs: Let’s start, if we could, with in fact, the technology itself. There are many nanotechnologies out there. How are you different?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we are concentrating on diversifying the company now. In addition to our existing intellectual portfolio, that everybody’s aware of, which relates to the NanoPierce connection system microtechnology, we have decided to expand the basis, the intellectual and commercial basis, of the company by going after potential acquisitions that are in the true nanotechnology sector. We are concentrating our selection, our due diligence and out concentration, on companies that are in the nanotechnology materials sector, and at the current time, after spending the better part of several months looking at multiple opportunities, we have essentially now narrowed our potential prospective acquired candidates down to two companies that are very, very strong and we are concentrating significantly on trying to convince them to become associated in some form, probably a direct acquisition with NanoPierce Technologies.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what about existing operations? How do those fit in?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we look at it as an enhancement of our existing operations. Currently existing operations are fairly narrow and very focused at the current time. We are concentrating almost exclusively on the manufacturing and selling of what we call smart labels, which are an antenna connected to a chip that are then put into a substrate which creates a smart label, and as you know a smart label is an item that can be, the chip can be, read and wrote to and information can be put on that, and then that is attached to an item to be identified.

We are, at the current time, extremely pleased as well as encouraged by recent developments that we have developed successfully for on of the world’s largest printer companies to be able to take our other product, Smart paper(TM), which is a chip connected to an antenna on an ordinary piece of paper that’s got an adhesive background, and by running that through a standard, and I say standard modified LaserJet printer we can both print the paper label as well as read/write to the chip. And whenever you then want to tag something you merely peel this label off and attach it to whatever you want. It has been successfully demonstrated publically to the satisfaction of many cognitiates in the industry and it’s impressive. We expect some very significant developments for that application.

Michael Wachs: What about now the steps to commercialize? What do you need to do?

Paul Metzinger: Well, to commercialize the application, the Smartpaper(TM) application, I just talked about, we recently incorporated a new wholly owned subsidiary of NanoPierce called ExypnoTech LLC. It’s got the exclusive marketing rights for the RFID components and products produced by ExypnoTech GmbH which is a company in Germany we own 49% of. We incorporated that new subsidiary for the express purpose of refining and developing the further applications of Smartpaper(TM) with that large printer company as well as one of the other large players in the industry, not a printer company, but well known to dominate the smart label industry for library applications. I am not free to identify it at the current time, but we are in active discussions with that company. So that area of activity of NanoPierce, which is based on our old technology, we are still very vigorously pursuing at the current time.

Michael Wachs: As you now look at the prospects gong forward, you mention these acquisitions, are there particular areas, Paul, that would be well suited?

Paul Metzinger: Yes, in fact both of these companies are exceptionally strong. One of them has a patented technology, well both of them have patented technologies, but the one in particular has a very unique technology that we think has significant implications for the nanotechnology area. They literally are able to refine materials down to one or more atoms, encapsulate those atoms, which allows them to be almost indefinitely stored and shipped without those atomic elements conglomerating, what they call coming back together. When you get ready to use it, you can use it at room temperature. We believe it to be a very significant improvement over anything that’s out there in the pure nanotechnology materials sector.

The other company is very, very strong. In fact, it’s exceptionally strong. The one we really would like to pursue. They are staffed with excellent management, have a full product line that can be applied in materials, whether it applies to the bio-medical industry, the organic industry, or pure metals and polymers. Better than strong. They do have sales. They do have revenues. We expect them to break into profitability this year. That would probably be the first such company like that in the United States that we are aware of.

In fact, we are represented in that connection by a very capable investment banking firm and at the current time we are assessing carefully now both of those companies, and, hopefully, we will be able to lead to a successful conclusion of those discussions for acquisition purposes.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what should investors look for in the coming quarters in terms of key developments?


Paul Metzinger: If we are successful in concluding terms and conditions on the acquisitions there will be major developments to be announced about those acquisitions in the nanotechnology sector.

If the further progress with this major printer company continues, and it is continuing, because we are now going into phases two and three of the program, we would anticipate that, that could have very substantial newsworthy developments for our shareholders leading to revenues and bottom line profitability. That’s someways out there yet, but the near term likelihood of revenues from these applications, I believe, is very substantial of likelihood to occur.

Michael Wachs: I’ve been speaking today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. a company that trades over-the-counter on the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that is now poised as to add to its portfolio of promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you Michael, I always appreciate the opportunity to talk with you.

END OF INTERVIEW

[kaliho]

http://http://www.exypnotech-llc.com/default.html

[kaliho]

http://www.exypnotech-llc.com/default.html

[kaliho]

http://www.exypnotech-llc.com/default.html


hoffentlich klappt dieser link....

[libertyjean]

Subject: RE: website Exypnotech LLC -- Inkjet AND LASER Printers
From Geoff
PostID 341046 On Sunday, July 04, 2004 (EST) at 9:38:36 AM
Response To: jigsaw PostID 341043

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, Jigsaw! I notice that the ExypnoTech LLC website`s description of SmartPaper (TM) indicates that modified laser printers are now available. Last I knew, they had only been working with inkjets.

Another incremental step.

Best regards,

Geoff

=====================================

SmartPaper™ incorporates an integrated transponder with a printable paper front-side and an adhesive backing. After printing and electronic writing of the RFID chip, the adhesive-backed transponder can be removed and used as a smart label, an electronic ticket, an electronic name badge or a low-cost smart card, all with both electronic information and human-readable print.

ExypnoTech has modified both ink-jet and laser printers to write and verify electronic information while simultaneously printing human-readable type.

[Hackertom1]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[ToSky]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[libertyjean]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[Katzennarr]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[kaliho]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[Hackertom1]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[libertyjean]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[Hackertom1]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[Strait1]

Liebe Leute ---> bitte !

[CaveModem [Mod]]

Guten Tag @all

ich möchte doch nachdrücklich darum bitten, gegenseitige persönliche Angriffe, wie gestern hier mehrfach eingestellt und nun von mir gelöscht, in Zukunft zu unterlassen.

Diskutiert hart, aber sachlich.

Danke
CaveModem

[MRASTA]

Moin zusammen,

ups, was war denn hier wieder los ?

Mal wieder ein leichter Disput über Paulchen ?

Ja, die Piercen können schon für Stimmung sorgen. Allerdings war die Richtung die letzten Jahre ziemlich einseitig und zu Paule sage ich nichts mehr.

Wie dem auch sei, Grüße an alle alten, neuen und möchte gerne Piercer. Speziell natürlich an die alte Garde.



Mit 14 Mio Cash -2 Mio oder so für Kosten etc. haben die wohl noch 12 Mio zur Zeit in der Tasche. Demnach dürfte der Kurs langsam zur Ruhe kommen. D.h. vom eigentlichen Business erwartet keiner auch nur einen Happen. Demnach Bewertung nur nach Cashbestand.

Das Interview von Paulchen brachte bis auf den Laserdrucker auch keine markanten Neuigkeiten, finde ich. Außerdem sind schon einige im Markt. Z.B. http://www.printronix.com/

Es stellt sich somit die Frage was demnächst passiert. Ich könnte mir durchaus vorstellen, dass das komplette Geschäft auf Exypnotech ausgelagert wird und Nanopierce in eine neue Schiene einsteigt. Die Gründung der neuen Firma spricht IMHO für diesen Weg. Über die Anteilsschiene ist man ja dann noch verbunden.

Fraglich bleibt, ob die Herrschafften ihre Optionen für 0.25 bei dem jetzigen Kurs einlösen. Wenn nicht, bleibt wohl nicht viel Knete für einen Zukauf über. Sieht IMHO nicht wirklich gut aus.

Heißes Spielchen zur Zeit. Entweder das Teil fährt in kurzer Zeit nun den letzten Rest der Strecke in die Versenkung oder aber es geschieht noch ein Wunder und einer der großen Druckerhersteller macht mit oder so ähnlich. Von dem reinen Waferpiercing ist wohl nicht mehr alzuviel übrig geblieben.

So scheint es wohl auszusehen. Ich schaue mir das lieber aus der Ferne an, ist mir zu heiß. Kann man doch einen Stop Buy setzen, wer es denn unbedingt will.


bis dann
mrasta

[ToSky]

Hallo
Wo kommen denn die ganzen Aktien her ,die hier ständig mit Verlust rausgehauen werden? Ich meine tiefere Kurse gab es ja noch nicht.
Habt Ihr keine Hoffnung mehr jetzt wo Nanopierce auf Jahrestief ist.

Leute jetzt ist es Zeit zu kaufen und nicht erst bei 0,30 oder höher.

Wie dem auch sei ,ich freu mich schon auf fette Gewinne.

Gruß ToSky

[beximimar]

Hallo ToSky
endlich schreibt mal wieder einer was.
Der Umsatz ist eigentlich in ordnung ich sehe jeden Tag die 10000€ marke.
Wann kommen da mal endlich wieder mal nachrichten.
Der Kurs schwankt immer zwischen 0.117 und 0,119
Ich habe mir bei 0,118 welche ins Depot gelegt.
Mal schaun was da so läuft.
Gruß
Beximimar

[avsa]

hallo tosky schön dass du mutig bis ich hoffe auch dass nano hoch gehen wird aber erst september meine meinung????

[beximimar]

Wie kommst du gerade auf September????

[Deaton]

.
auch wenn`s müll is,

abwärtstrend über 7 monate
umsätze nehmen wieder zu



denke, ein versuch is es wert!

[stevemann]

wann passiert endlich was???????

das gibst doch nicht

[beximimar]

ich warte auch darauf das sich endlich mal was bewegt.
der umsatz ist ja in ordnung, aber der kurs ist zum kotzen.

[beximimar]

Ich habe da was interisantes gefunden?????????????ß
Das müsst ihr euch mal durchlesen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wenn das stimmt hauts mich vom Hocker

Leider von Alvista nicht richtig übersetzt worden.


Ich übernehme keine verantwortung dafür was da steht aber ich glaube das es interisant ist.




Der neue Prozeß eingeordnet von Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) behauptet, daß Depository Trust und Clearing Corp. eine Menge Gründe hat, fast ein Milliarde von ihnen ein Jahr, um den ungültigen blanken Leerverkauf in Kraft zu halten

der ungültige blanke Leerverkauf hat Hunderte von den Milliarden abgestreift, wenn nicht TRILLIONEN, der Dollar von den amerikanischen Investoren," und innen über 7.000 Aktiengesellschaften resultiert sind ", die kurzgeschlossen werden aus Bestehen über den letzten sechs Jahren heraus." Besagtes Burrell einige Experten glauben soviel wie, $1 Trillion bis $3 Trillion zu dieser Praxis verloren worden ist

daß die Mannschaft 65-lawyer rüber durch Leitung Rechtsanwälte Wes Christen vorsaß und John O`Quinn mehr den als 1.200 spekulativen Fond und vom Land entfernte Konten aufgedeckt hat, die durch mehr als 150 Vermittler-Händler und marktbestimmende Effektenhändler in einer gemeinsamen kooperativen Bemühung, kleine und mittlere Größe Aktiengesellschaften von ihrem Wert abzustreifen arbeiten. Vor der Verarbeitung des Auftrages vor kurzem genehmigten erforderten das NASD und DIE VEREINIGTE STAATEN Aktie-und der Austausch-Kommission ein Zwischenzeitsblankes kurz-verkaufendes Band-Hilfsmittel und VEREINIGTE STAATEN Vermittler, eine "bestätigende Ermittlung" diese Kurzverkäufer, sogar die fremden Kurzverkäufer zu bilden, meistens kanadisch, können Bescheinigungen finden, um zu bedecken. Letztes Jahr, viele belagerte Aktiengesellschaften gesuchten Schutz von der Handhabung, indem es suchte, das DTC herauszunehmen, aber an Juni 14, 2003, die sek angegeben

Der Nanopierce Prozeß, gesagt worden, um der erste von vielen aus dem Kasten heraus zu sein, schlägt nachdrücklich anders vor. Nach Ansicht des Rechtsanwalt Christen et al. ist das DTC am Herzen des Problems, und hat fast Milliarde Dollar ein das Jahr, wenn es das Problem hält. Depository Trust Company (DTC) ist ein Mitglied des VEREINIGTE STAATEN Bundesreserve-Systems, eine Begrenztzweck Treuhandgesellschaft unter Staat- New-Yorkbankrecht und eine eingetragene löschende Agentur mit der sek
Während der Nanopierce Prozeß auf dem Zustandniveau eingeordnet worden ist, eine andere gerechte Überschrift des Begleiterprozesses zu den Gerichten im Namen Exotics.com (OTC: EXII) wird auf der Bundesebene argumentiert. Klage Nanopierces im 2. Gerichtsamtsgericht in Nevada, ist Fall Nr. CV04-01079, behauptet, daß der des DTCs "Vorrat Programm" wurde "purportedly verursacht, um KURZE BEZEICHNUNG Anlieferung Ausfälle zu adressieren," borgen, aber daß das "Ende Resultat des Programms 10 Millionen der unissued und nicht registrierten im allgemeinen Markt gehandelt zu werden Anteile ist verursachen gesollt,," und in einigen Fällen, resultierend in "zwei oder mehr Aktionären, denen Anteile an den unterschiedlichen Verhandlungen kaufen Sie zu, besitzen die gleichen Anteile

Nanopierce behauptet, daß DTCC und NSCC einen "Entwurf" zu "manipulieren abwärts den Preis der betroffenen Aktien angeschlossen haben, dadurch sieverringern sieverringern den Marktwert geöffneten Ausfallen, um Positionen zu liefern." Die Klage behauptet auch, daß die Beklagten Verkäufer ermöglicht haben, geöffnetes Ausfallen beizubehalten, um Positionen von 10 Millionen Anteilen für Perioden von einem Jahr sogar länger zu liefern und. Sie veranschlägt die nationale Verbindung der Wertpapierhändler, da, zulassend, daß "Interessen durch Mitglieder, Aussteller, Investoren und andere interessierte Beteiligte über die möglicherweise mißbräuchlichen Leerverkauftätigkeiten angehoben worden sind, die im Markt auftreten. Insbesondere blankes, ohne Sicherheiten zu borgen kurz können Leerverkauf oder verkaufen, um Anlieferung zu bilden, lange Bezeichnung Störungen ergeben, einschließlich gesamte Störungen zu liefern zu liefern, die die Gesamthin- und Herbewegung einer Sicherheit übersteigen. NASD glaubt, daß solchen ausgedehnten Störungen zu liefern einen negativen Effekt auf dem Markt haben kann. Unter anderem durch nicht Sicherheiten liefern, das Müssen, blanke Leerverkäufer können auf größeren kurzen Positionen, als nehmen anders zulässig seien Sie, die Manipulationstätigkeit erleichtern können." Nanopierce behauptet, daß es "auf materielle Misrepresentations und Auslassungen durch DTC und NSCC gebaut hatte, wenn es seine Anteile an der Börse" ohne Wissen der Beklagter Betrug-auf-d Markt durch Aussagen handelte, die sie über die Reinigung- und Regelungsdienstleistungen abgaben, sie zur Verfügung stellten." Weiter behauptet es, daß die Beklagten mit "scienter" fungierten, da sie einen finanziellen finanziellen hauptsächlichbeweggrund, zum ihrer Dienstleistungen falsch darzustellen hatten, die Nanopierce Ansprüche auch nichtkonkurrierend sind.
Da der Nanopierce Prozeß aufdeckt, waren die in der Tat die starken Wörter und einmischten sich als er, in einer erheblichen Einkommen Unterseite für das DTCC. Vor kurzem führende marktbestimmende Effektenhändler und Vermittler genannt in den verschiedenen Prozessen und in anderen Tätigkeiten, einschließlich FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs U. Co. (NYSE: Gs), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (Nasdaq: MHMY), Olde/H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Herrschaft (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse-Gruppe und vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: ALTER), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (Nasdaq: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) und ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: UND), wurden gezwungen, um mit der neuen kurz-verkaufenden Marktordnung einzuwilligen, die durch das NASD nach der sek auferlegt wurde, hatte "gesessen auf" dem NASD Antrag, materielle Schlitze für fast 2-1/2 Jahre zu verstopfen

[Wunram]

@beximimar

bitte den link zum Original! Lieber Englisch, als so ein Kauderwelsch

Gruss Wunram

[beximimar]

Die SEC steht gewaltig in der Kritik.

“Amazingly, the SEC has admitted it had been ‘observing’ naked short selling for six years, but up to now has done absolutely nothing to put a halt to it.




June 14, 2004. (FinancialWire) FinancialWire learned several months ago that “Dateline,” the investigatory TV program aired by General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) NBC unit, has been preparing a blockbuster expose of “Stockgate,” the term coined by FinancialWire to encompass the massive naked shorting scandal, that could cause the entire financial community to implode, but FinancialWire had honored requests from participants to keep the plans for the program confidential.

That has changed now following a story by The Faulking Truth website. “It`s been called the biggest financial scandal in the history of the world, with incurred losses estimated by some experts at well over $1 trillion dollars. It`s a scandal that involves over 1,200 offshore hedge funds, over 150 US brokers, [including Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET)], and has already bankrupted over 7,000 US companies in the past six years,” said Mark Faulk, entitled “Is Dateline Losing Credibility Over StockGate Story Delays?”

“According to many of the lawsuits filed to date, the crooks include terrorist groups and organized crime syndicates. Sources say that this scandal, which involves an intricate system of selling electronic counterfeit shares of stock in an effort to destroy the market value of small publically traded companies by utilizing a method known as ‘naked short selling’, will eventually implicate almost every major broker in America, all of the governing bodies that oversee trading, and will extend into Canada and Europe,” stated the article.

“Amazingly, the SEC has admitted it had been ‘observing’ naked short selling for six years, but up to now has done absolutely nothing to put a halt to it.

“As The Faulking Truth has written about and followed this story over the past few months, one nagging question has remained: where is the national press coverage on this issue? Aside from a few recent articles in national newspapers, which have barely scratched the surface of this worldwide scandal, why has this been largely ignored by the mainstream media? Why hasn`t one of the major network investigative shows put together an in depth expose` to blow this scandal wide open?

“Incredibly, we have confirmed that Dateline has done that very thing. According to sources involved with the story, NBC`s flagship news program has filmed over 100 hours of explosive footage on the ‘StockGate’ scandal, which includes evidence that will ‘blow the roof off this scandal’, stated Faulk.

“There is only one problem. Originally scheduled to air in January or early February, they have postponed the show repeatedly, and now plan to air it ‘sometime in August.’ Even more incredibly, we have learned that they have signed an exclusivity contract with the two law firms that have filed the class action lawsuits that deal with the naked shorting scandal, in effect suppressing the public release of even more information about the scandal.

“After publicly speaking out about the scandal early on, attorneys John O`Quinn (of the Houston law firm of O’Quinn, Laminack and Pirtle), and Wes Christian (of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell) have been uncharacteristically quiet for the past few months. That`s because Dateline has kept a muzzle on the two attorneys until the ‘StockGate’ segment airs.

“However, lead attorney Wes Christian has filmed over twenty hours of exclusive interviews for the Dateline segment. Although exclusivity contracts involving the media aren`t unusual, this situation is a bit different. This scandal is ongoing, and in fact seems to be accelerating in the past couple of months, even after new NASD regulations supposedly aimed at putting a halt to the corruption went into affect on April 1st.”

FinancialWire has learned that Dateline may be pointing a large finger of conflict at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission itself, which reportedly receives a slice of every transaction fee as part of its budget. According to court filings supported by the O’Quinn/Christian network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its “Stock Borrow Program,” which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

“The shelving of this important expose` by Dateline NBC raises some very important moral and ethical issues, in this writer`s opinion,” said Faulk.

“If in fact they have collected information that would help to put a stop to the massive criminal activity that is robbing American companies and their stockholders of literally hundreds of millions of dollars every day, aren`t they at the very least morally obligated to release that information in a timely fashion? And since they have postponed the show for the last four months, shouldn`t they release attorneys O`Quinn and Christian from their exclusivity contract, so that they can disseminate information that might be vital in helping the victimized companies, their shareholders, and the various governing bodies put to end this ongoing corruption? And if in fact the money being stolen from honest Americans is being used to fund terrorism and organized crime, then shouldn`t Dateline immediately make public any information that could help put an end to those insidious activities? Dateline declined to respond to repeated email inquiries for this article.

“The question remains: why has Dateline been so slow to expose this monumental ongoing scandal, even as the corruption continues? There is some debate on that point. Some sources believe that they have ‘caved in to political pressure from the Right, who see this as a political time bomb for the Bush Administration’, while C. Austin Burrell, who has provided litigation and research support to O`Quinn and Christian in their lawsuits, believes that Dateline has it`s own political and journalistic agenda, and plans to air the show in August to coincide with the Democratic Convention.
“The scheduled August air date concerns Burrell as well. ‘August is a dead month, with half of all people on vacation, and the other half not paying attention. It is not an appropriate month to release a piece with such a business focus’,” the article quoted him as saying.

“Still others close to the story say it is the complexity and constantly evolving nature of the story that makes it difficult to edit and air. According to Burrell, ‘This is not a difficult story, and it needs to get out there now. Dateline has made an important time commitment to this topic, and we simply want to see the payoff for the victims’,” the article noted.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been “listing” the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control “Stock Borrow Program” run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to “outlaw” ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The rule proposal would bar stock transfer agents from handling shares that carry any limitations on transfer. Control over stock certificates is one of the ways that small companies have combated illegal naked short sellers. Burns quoted Nazareth as saying that these companies’ “self-help” efforts “aren’t helping U.S. markets overall.” Nazareth was quoted as saying restrictions on stocks are “a significant step backwards” in the “move from paper stock certificates to automated computerized trading.”

Nazareth said that abusive “naked” short selling has been a problem “in some cases,” but that is “best dealt with by a pending SEC proposal,” presumably Regulation SHO.

SEC Commissioner William Donaldson purportedly publicly refused to answer any questions from the NASD about the timing of the Commission’s consideration of the Regulation at a conference where he was simultaneously proposing early reforms of the mutual fund scandals. The Dow Jones said, however, that Robert Colby, SEC deputy market regulation division director, predicted the SEC will take that to a vote in early June.

The Dow Jones report noted that “naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The stock certiticate plan has been put to a 30-day comment periodl Then the SEC would have to vote to adopt it. If adopted, Colby was quoted as saying that regulators might “sue firms that seek to impose restrictions on stock transfers.”

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. “Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors,” and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been “shorted out of existence over the past six years.” Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the “sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy.”

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O’Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Recently the NASD and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved an interim naked short-selling band-aid, requiring U.S. brokers to make an “affirmative determination” that short-sellers, even foreign short-sellers, mostly Canadian, can find certificates to cover before processing the order.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on June 14, 2003, the SEC stated “the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means.”

The Nanopierce lawsuit, said to be the first of many out of the box, emphatically suggests otherwise. According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively " dematerializing" most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in “custody.”

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the “Stock Borrow Program.”

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. “There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times,” giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

“Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential ‘float’ in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term ‘float’ meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence.” Burrell said the Christian/O’Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the “counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the ‘Sale of Unregistered Securities’.”

While the Nanopierce lawsuit has been filed at the state level, another companion lawsuit just heading to the courts on behalf of Exotics.com (OTC: EXII) will be argued at the Federal level.

Nanopierce’s suit in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Nevada, is Case No. CV04-01079, alleges that the DTC’s “stock borrow program” was “purportedly created to address SHORT TERM delivery failures,” but that the “end result of the program has been to create tens of millions of unissued and unregistered shares to be traded in the public market,” and in some instances resulting in “two or more shareholders who purchase shares in separate transactions to own the same shares.”

The complaint alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the “stock borrow” program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that “open positions” resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, “approximated $3,025,467,000” due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC’s “Stock Borrow Program.”

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a “scheme” to “manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions.” The suit also claims that the defendants have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that “concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity.”

Nanopierce claims that it had “relied on material misrepresentations and omissions by DTC and NSCC in trading its shares in the stock market “without knowledge of Defendants’ fraud-on-the market through statements they made about the clearing and settlement services they provided.” Further, it claims that the Defendants acted with “scienter” since they had a major financial financial motivation to falsely represent their services, which Nanopierce claims are also anticompetitive.

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC’s June 14 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.’s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:
They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);
Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).
In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned " NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition.”

As the Nanopierce lawsuit reveals, those were indeed strong words, meddling as it did, in a substantial revenues base for the DTCC.
Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion’s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had “sat on” the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.
“The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD (" non-member broker/dealers" ).

[beximimar]

ich habe natülich vorher nur das rausgesucht was für nanopiece wichtig ist.
da steht anderes auch noch dabei.

[Katzennarr]

Ich bleibe dabei, wir sehen die 0,10 Dollar.

[beximimar]

das hoffe ich natürlich nicht.
den wer will schon das die aktie fällt

[ToSky]

Sollte man nochmal lesen .

Transcript of Paul Metzinger’s CEOCast Interview on 6/30/2004

Michael Wachs: Good day, this is Michael Wachs of CEOCast. I’m here today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., a company that trades over the counter under the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that seeks to further advance its promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast today.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you, Michael, it’s always a privilege.

Michael Wachs: If you could begin with an overview of the company and then we’ll get into the technology in greater detail.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, just a general overview from a financial standpoint. I just want to inform our shareholders as well as our prospective investing public that we are in excellent financial condition. We have no debt. We are very, very liquid at the current time as a result of the $14.5 million financing we completed in January. Those investors have enabled us to go out and start concentrating on the redirection of the company, the transformation of the company, into new commercial opportunities.

Michael Wachs: Let’s start, if we could, with in fact, the technology itself. There are many nanotechnologies out there. How are you different?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we are concentrating on diversifying the company now. In addition to our existing intellectual portfolio, that everybody’s aware of, which relates to the NanoPierce connection system microtechnology, we have decided to expand the basis, the intellectual and commercial basis, of the company by going after potential acquisitions that are in the true nanotechnology sector. We are concentrating our selection, our due diligence and out concentration, on companies that are in the nanotechnology materials sector, and at the current time, after spending the better part of several months looking at multiple opportunities, we have essentially now narrowed our potential prospective acquired candidates down to two companies that are very, very strong and we are concentrating significantly on trying to convince them to become associated in some form, probably a direct acquisition with NanoPierce Technologies.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what about existing operations? How do those fit in?

Paul Metzinger: Well, we look at it as an enhancement of our existing operations. Currently existing operations are fairly narrow and very focused at the current time. We are concentrating almost exclusively on the manufacturing and selling of what we call smart labels, which are an antenna connected to a chip that are then put into a substrate which creates a smart label, and as you know a smart label is an item that can be, the chip can be, read and wrote to and information can be put on that, and then that is attached to an item to be identified.

We are, at the current time, extremely pleased as well as encouraged by recent developments that we have developed successfully for on of the world’s largest printer companies to be able to take our other product, Smart paper(TM), which is a chip connected to an antenna on an ordinary piece of paper that’s got an adhesive background, and by running that through a standard, and I say standard modified LaserJet printer we can both print the paper label as well as read/write to the chip. And whenever you then want to tag something you merely peel this label off and attach it to whatever you want. It has been successfully demonstrated publically to the satisfaction of many cognitiates in the industry and it’s impressive. We expect some very significant developments for that application.

Michael Wachs: What about now the steps to commercialize? What do you need to do?

Paul Metzinger: Well, to commercialize the application, the Smartpaper(TM) application, I just talked about, we recently incorporated a new wholly owned subsidiary of NanoPierce called ExypnoTech LLC. It’s got the exclusive marketing rights for the RFID components and products produced by ExypnoTech GmbH which is a company in Germany we own 49% of. We incorporated that new subsidiary for the express purpose of refining and developing the further applications of Smartpaper(TM) with that large printer company as well as one of the other large players in the industry, not a printer company, but well known to dominate the smart label industry for library applications. I am not free to identify it at the current time, but we are in active discussions with that company. So that area of activity of NanoPierce, which is based on our old technology, we are still very vigorously pursuing at the current time.

Michael Wachs: As you now look at the prospects gong forward, you mention these acquisitions, are there particular areas, Paul, that would be well suited?

Paul Metzinger: Yes, in fact both of these companies are exceptionally strong. One of them has a patented technology, well both of them have patented technologies, but the one in particular has a very unique technology that we think has significant implications for the nanotechnology area. They literally are able to refine materials down to one or more atoms, encapsulate those atoms, which allows them to be almost indefinitely stored and shipped without those atomic elements conglomerating, what they call coming back together. When you get ready to use it, you can use it at room temperature. We believe it to be a very significant improvement over anything that’s out there in the pure nanotechnology materials sector.

The other company is very, very strong. In fact, it’s exceptionally strong. The one we really would like to pursue. They are staffed with excellent management, have a full product line that can be applied in materials, whether it applies to the bio-medical industry, the organic industry, or pure metals and polymers. Better than strong. They do have sales. They do have revenues. We expect them to break into profitability this year. That would probably be the first such company like that in the United States that we are aware of.

In fact, we are represented in that connection by a very capable investment banking firm and at the current time we are assessing carefully now both of those companies, and, hopefully, we will be able to lead to a successful conclusion of those discussions for acquisition purposes.

Michael Wachs: Paul, what should investors look for in the coming quarters in terms of key developments?


Paul Metzinger: If we are successful in concluding terms and conditions on the acquisitions there will be major developments to be announced about those acquisitions in the nanotechnology sector.

If the further progress with this major printer company continues, and it is continuing, because we are now going into phases two and three of the program, we would anticipate that, that could have very substantial newsworthy developments for our shareholders leading to revenues and bottom line profitability. That’s someways out there yet, but the near term likelihood of revenues from these applications, I believe, is very substantial of likelihood to occur.

Michael Wachs: I’ve been speaking today with Paul H. Metzinger. Paul is Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. a company that trades over-the-counter on the Bulletin Board symbol NPCT, and one that is now poised as to add to its portfolio of promising nanotechnologies. Paul, thanks for joining CEOCast.

Paul Metzinger: Yes, thank you Michael, I always appreciate the opportunity to talk with you.

END OF INTERVIEW

[beximimar]

ja das liest sich schon gut.
Barmittel haben sie!!
Es scheint so die Technologie auch.
Wo ist der kurs
dann kann was nicht stimmen.


Bei so viel geschleime wird mir ganz schlecht.
warum sackt der kurs immer weiter ab.
wenns einer firma gut geht dann steht sie woanders.

[beximimar]

wenn ich denn kurs heute anschaue dann komme ich vom Kotzen gar nicht mehr weg.

[stevemann]

na toll momentan halten wir bei flotten 0,90€ schöner schei...

[Katzennarr]

Mit etwas gutem Willen, werden wir morgen Einstiegskurse haben.

[Katzennarr]

Ich betone extra, dass ich es für jeden bedauere, dass er mit npct Geld verliert.
Ich hatte mein Lehrgeld schon gezahlt.
Ich freue mich nur darüber, dass ich die Sache vor einiger Zeit richtig erkannt hatte und erst mal raus bin.
Vor kurzem wollte mir kaum einer Glauben, dass ich zu 0,10 Dollar wieder einsteigen werde.

[ToSky]

Jetzt kommt drüben aber richtig Volumen auf ,letzter 0,12 .
659.720 St. gehandelt.

[Katzennarr]

Nanopierce bleibt halt ne Zockerbude.

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

ich werde bei 0,11 $ wieder einsteigen.

Begründung:
Ich habe mir soeben den Chart angeschaut und stelle fest,
daß der Boden erreicht ist!

Irgend jemand will billigst einsammeln!
Mit kleinen Stückzahlen wird der Kurs nach unten gedrückt,
um günstig große Stückzahlen zu bekommen.

Das ist meine Meinung bzw. Feststellung.

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[Hynel]

wer will noch soviel Geld 0,10$ ausgeben, für eine fast bankrotte Firma, die sind so tot, toter geht´s nicht mehr!

Wer bereit für Lehrgeldzahlung ist, kann ja einen Zock wagen, dann sollte man aber bis 0,07$warten.
Cahrt bei solch einen Wert kann man vergesse, hier hilft eventuell eine Gebetskette.
Nanopierce wird nicht überleben!

Meine Meinung VERKAUFEN , solange man noch dafür bekommt!

[DMKE]

die kommt meiner meinung auch wieder bis jahresende hoch auf ca. 0,20 €

[ehrenwort]

hört, hört! Wenigstens einer, der einen hoch kriegt.

[beximimar]

das glaube ich auch.
oder besser gesagt das hoffe ich auch.

[ToSky]

Der Spread ist ja heute ziemlich eng in Frankfurt .

[ToSky]

Glaubt Jemand an einen Rebound heute ?

[Rob2303]

warum ?
es kommt doch immer anders als man denkt, also
verkaufen ?

[kaliho]

naja, hinterher kann man das leicht sagen.

ich habe bei eur 0,11 wieder eingekauft und bin damit zufrieden.

wie sagt man? nur luegner und glueckspilze kaufen zum billigsten und verkaufen zum teuersten stand.

[DMKE]

werde mal bei 0,09 nachlegen

[Katzennarr]

@kaliho

Der Spruch ist zwar alt, stimmt aber immer wieder.

[Rob2303]

habe auch nochmal bei 0,093 nachgelegt.
egal, was die shortseller oder sonstigen dunklen mächte
hier veranstalten, es wird der tag kommen, an dem
die aktie wieder mit leben erfüllt wird.

viel glück
rob

[DMKE]

habe auch zu 0,090 nachgelegt

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

nicht nur Nanopierce wurde nieder geprügelt, sondern auch
andere Nanotech-Werte!

Die Fonds wollen bei den Nanotech-Werten wieder zum Null-
tarif rein.

Ich habe erfahren, daß im Herbst dieses Jahres wieder neue
Fonds aufgelegt werden sollen.

Nanopierce ist in meinen Augen nicht tot, sondern eine
"Zombie"!

Nun Spaß beiseite!

Die Strategie von Nanopierce ist nicht übel!
Zuerst zwei Töchter in Deutschland gründen (aus steuer-
lichen sowie Kosten-Gründen in den neuen Bundesländern)
und diese dann später an die Börse bringen.

Ich werde mich hier immer dann wieder melden, wenn es
charttechnisch interessant wird!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[kaliho]

StockGate: Riggs Regulatory Failures Exemplified in StockGate Scandal,Says Patch

Jul 23, 2004 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) In a scathing commentary, the founder of InvestigatetheSEC.com, David Patch, a wronged investor who has become a leader in the fight against illegal naked short selling, has raised the issue of regulatory failures in the case of Riggs National Corp. (NASDAQ: RIGS) to those associated with StockGate.

StockGate has embroiled hundreds of companies, millions of investors, billions of dollars and dozens of brokerages such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), and Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), which has just announced it will exit the market-making business.

``It would not be Washington Politics if we are not a daily dose of `Do as I say not as I do`,`` said Patch. ``This time, the contradictions lie with Senator Carl Levin and his admonishment of Federal Banking Regulators as it pertains to the Riggs Bank scandal.

Patch quotes a Dow Jones news report:

``When a bank such as Riggs operates with such reckless abandon and federal regulators are so ineffectual in their oversight, it does little to inspire confidence in our country`s determination to stop money laundering, especially when that bank is located here in our nation`s capital,` Levin said.

In the 113-page report, the minority staff of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee`s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations urges bank regulators to bolster enforcement of anti-money laundering laws to prevent future oversight lapses.

``The failure to take quick and forceful enforcement action in the Riggs matter is not an isolated case,`` states the report, which details the findings of the panel`s investigation.

``It is symptomatic of uneven and, at times, ineffective enforcement by all federal bank regulators of bank compliance with their anti-money laundering obligations,`` the report said.

Patch noted that, ``suddenly it would appear that the Senator from Michigan is worried about the ill effects of money laundering and failed regulatory attentiveness. If only he would walk across the hall to the Senate Banking Committee and address those concerns with the committee. It is the Senate Banking Committee that has authorized the Securities and Exchange Commission to continue to allow our nations wealthiest Wall Street firms to continue to allow settlement failures in our securities to be used to launder money for many criminal elements including terrorists and organized crime.

``Recently the SEC passed a reform package, regulation SHO, in which they admitted that settlement failures can exceed the entire public float of companies. The SEC also admitted that 4% of all publicly traded companies have settlement failure abuses. The terms of the reform package for this abuse, however, has allowed the settlement failures of the past to remain unsettled indefinitely and the incorporation of changes to be pushed out another 6 months. All of this is in direct violation of Section 17A of the Congressional Securities Act of 1934. ``Unfortunately, when the Act was drafted it did not address the conflict of interest within Congress between Investor protection and campaign contributions by Wall Street.

``Settlement failures are tied to money laundering through a well documented paper trail. In Canada the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) has taken on a case against Pacific International (PI) in which the BSCS claims that PI helped launder money into the US markets for US Organized Crime families. British Columbia Securities director Sasha Angus had these statements to make during the hearings (www.rgm.com/articles/cornucopiaofcrooks.html) :

``Pacific International was little more than a massive stock and money laundering conduit which attracted and serviced scores of criminals, securities violators and other dubious American clients to circumvent American regulations and laws.

``According to a BCSC analysis, the commissions earned by Pacific International from accounts trading in U.S. stocks grew from $2.3-million in 1993 to about $19.2-million by Dec. 31, 1999, including trading done on a spread basis by brokers Dirk Rachfall and Michael Patterson, who were lured to Seattle by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, arrested, convicted and jailed for dealing with other Mafia-linked clients.

``The last major focus of alleged abuses was in the field of short selling. `Many of P.I.`s U.S. clients were heavily involved in short sales. Staff reviewed ten particularized accounts for short sales. The total dollar amount of the month-end short positions in these accounts was approximately $72-million. In the month of June, 1999, alone there were 669 short sale trades totaling over $23-million,` Patch stated that Angus told the hearing.

``The evidence will show that the short sales done in U.S. markets from the P.I. accounts were naked shorts. That is, they were not covered in any way at the time the short sale was entered into. The evidence will also show that short selling of that nature is illegal in the U.S. and was a major reason why many of P.I.`s clients were trading at P.I. They were there, to the knowledge of P.I., to trade into the U.S. in defiance of American trading rules. They assisted knowingly in a breach of American trading rules. P.I. condoned that and grew fat on it.``

Patch continued:

``The fact is these shares remain uncovered as they rest on our Wall Street books as unsettled trades. Like in the Riggs case, this crime is not isolated to simply one firm. Our US financial firms helped perpetrate these violations by failing to force settlement from the short seller and today, the Securities Regulators and the Senate Banking Commission are both willing to let it fly.

``Wall Street was given a free pass to their assumed liabilities. The cost of this abuse is immeasurable. The money laundering is not limited to organized crime but also terrorism. The SEC and Congress are fully aware of this fact. Therefore, losses are beyond monetary and into the loss of human lives. Is that to be considered acceptable collateral damage to protect these Wall Street firms who made a killing in years past in trade commissions on trades they never settled?

``Pacific International had its commissions grow to nearly $20 Million in 1999. An equal commission was taking place across the border in the US to those who were taking the trades executed by Pacific International.

``The Senate Banking Committee has the responsibility of oversight over the SEC. That oversight is supposed to be guided by the Securities Act of 1934 drafted by former Congressman. Today, with clear verbiage in the Act to address the need for ``prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of trades`` for the safety of the investor and the industry the present oversight committee is willing to forgo that law to protect those that aided in the crime in the first place.

``Only they can tell us why.

``Senator Levin was clear in his message that regulatory failures exist and that changes were needed. He was talking about banking regulations and he appeared to be one willing to force change. For me personally, I would hope that the senator would walk across the hallways to his colleagues in the SEC Oversight Committees and explain to them the impacts these failures have on our economy, our markets, and our reputation as a nation.

``The Senate cannot deny the existence of this abuse based on the data already provided. To ignore it now, and to play politics with American lives, is inexcusable. There is no justifiable reason to allow the Wall Street firms to continue to manipulate our investments by failing to settle these abusive settlement failures. These firms took the commissions on these trades and have failed to close out the contract as they were paid a commission to do.

``The financial risk of their actions must now be addressed as opposed to placing that risk on the unsuspecting public,`` Patch concluded.

As noted, Charles Schwab & Co. said it is exiting the market-making business. It is one of several market makers that have been the subject of accusations and/or legal entanglements over naked shorting allegations and issues.

The company had said it is either the number one or number two market-maker in more than half of all of NASDAQ`s (OTCBB: NDAQ) listed stocks.

Recently observers were surprised to find a comment letter submitted to the SEC by Mike Alexander, Senior VP of Charles Schwab, that admits outright that brokerages regularly ignore rules and regulations, saying it is not rules that need to be written; it is changes in behavior that is needed.

The comments were directed towards proposed changes in the U.S. settlement system, but could easily apply to other regulations as well.

``Improvements in the U.S. settlement system will only be truly achieved if and when regulations are rationalized to ensure that all market participants are held accountable for compliance. For example, the industry has struggled with the issue of institutional trade affirmation for quite some time now. While the benefits to the clearance and settlement system are self-evident, Buy-Side firms and Custodian banks have been resistant to make those changes that provide for same-day trade confirmation / affirmation and assurance of trade settlement,`` said Alexander.

``Schwab opposes the notion that securities intermediaries such as broker-dealers be required to police compliance,`` he stated. ``The NYSE and other SROs have had trade affirmation rules on their books for some time. However, such rules have not been effective in changing the behavior

of Buy-Side firms or their custodians; nor do the rules provide assurance that the affirmed trade will settle.

``Recognition of this fact is evidence that changes to the settlement cycle not only require overhauling systems, but also changing behavior. We believe that only by holding all market

participants directly accountable for making required affirmations will the necessary changes to behavior,`` he stated at www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s71304/charlesschwab061604.pdf .

In a June 23 release, the SEC stated it has put into place Rule 202(T), which establishes procedures to allow the Commission to temporarily suspend the operation of the current ``tick`` test in Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for specified securities.

Through a separate order, the Commission will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one-year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for approximately one-third of stocks in the Russell 3000 index.

The order also will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1 for short sales executed in any security included in the Russell 1000 index after 4:15 p.m. Eastern, and all other securities after the close of the consolidated tape, and until the open of the consolidated tape the next day.

The pilot will commence on January 3, 2005 to permit broker-dealers and self-regulatory organizations to make the necessary programming adjustments.

The Commission deferred consideration of the proposal to replace the current ``tick`` test of Rule 10a-1 with a new uniform bid test. The Commission could reconsider any further action on these proposals after the completion of the pilot.

Rule 203, which will incorporate current Rule 10a-2 and will create a uniform Commission rule requiring broker-dealers, prior to effecting short sales in all equity securities, to ``locate`` securities available for borrowing.

There will be limited exceptions from the locate requirement, including for short sales by registered market makers in connection with bona-fide market making.

Rule 203 also imposes additional requirements on designated ``threshold securities.`` Rule 203 defines a threshold security to mean an equity security for which there is an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more and that is equal to at least 0.5% of the issue`s total shares outstanding.

Where a clearing agency participant has a fail to deliver position in threshold securities that persists for ten consecutive days after settlement, the participant must take action to close out the position. Until the position is closed out, the participant, and any broker-dealer for which it clears transactions, may not effect further short sales in the particular threshold security without borrowing or entering into a bona fide arrangement to borrow the security.

Rule 203 will become effective 30 days after publication with a compliance date of January 3, 2005, to permit firms to make programming and procedural adjustments.

Rule 200, which among other things, will redesignate current Rule 3b-3 with some modifications to define ownership and aggregation of securities positions, and include a requirement to mark all sell orders in all equity securities. Rule 200 will become effective 30 days after publication.

The Commission also adopted amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M to remove the current shelf offering exception, and issued interpretive guidance addressing sham transactions designed to evade the rule.

The amendment applies to short sales effected within five days prior to the pricing of a shelf offering. Such short sales may not be covered with offering securities purchased from an underwriter or other broker-dealer participating in the offering.

The Rule 105 amendments will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and the interpretive guidance will be effective upon such publication.

Opponents of naked short selling were, however, quick to denounce the provision that allows market makers an exemption, and many market observers said that the SEC should provide a public list of companies that fall into the ``threshold security`` category.

``The SEC claims that the number of companies involved in this `threshold security` category is 4% of all publicly traded companies. If in fact it is that small the process is certainly manageable,`` said the website InvestigatetheSEC.com at www.investigatethesec.com . ``It is also the right of every issuer, in protecting their business and their investors to know the status of their stock trading.``

Some were discussing whether the SEC can keep such information private under the Freedom of Information Act.

The marketplace is already upset over promises by the Berlin Stock Exchange, since broken, that it would delist any company upon request.

``Please understand that cessation of trading in the shares of XRAYMEDIA Inc. (OTCBB: XRYM) is not possible,`` the exchange told one such requester.

It`s not just U.S. companies such as Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), and eLinear Inc. (AMEX: ELU) or Israeli companies that have had serious concerns about their unannounced and unathrorized listings on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange.

Apparently, some 150 British companies are protesting the same fate.

A number of UK-listed companies have demanded a London Stock Exchange investigation after they found that their shares are being traded.

Meanwhile, Whistler, Sonoran and eLinear have announced they have successfully secured their delistings, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has rescheduled its open hearing to consider the adoption of amendments to Regulation Sho to July 23 at 9:30 a.m. The announcement is at www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig061504.txt .

According to the London Money Telegraph, ``several companies believe the market for their shares has been distorted and that they have fallen in value after trading started on the Berlin-Bremen exchange.

``Some smaller companies, whose shares are lightly traded in London, fear the Berlin market has been used by speculators to short-sell their shares.``

The Telegraph said the number of companies are thought to be as high as 150, including even ``larger companies`` such as Matalan (OTC: MATNF) and Halfords.

Mladen Ninkov, the chairman of Aim-listed Griffin Mining (OTC: GFNMF), was quoted as saying: ``We were put on the Berlin market without our knowledge by a German broker and now we`ve got about 8m shares out in a short sale. It is horrifying - that is about 4 per cent of the company and it is forcing the price down.``

A spokesman for the London Stock Exchange said: ``If there is evidence of market abuse we would refer that on to the appropriate authorities.``

Whistler said that according to its transfer agent records, ``we have 5,504,680 shares held by DTC, but the ADP broker search indicates of 6,217,458 shares being reported by broker/dealers as being held on behalf of their customers, indicating a short position of more than 700,000 shares. A summary report can be viewed at www.whistlerinvestments.com/shorts.html .

``We have therefore commenced work with DTC for a formal review of the reported excessive broker/dealer holdings of our stock so that we can conduct our corporate affairs properly in view of our planned stockholders meeting and other upcoming corporate matters. We again advise our stockholders make sure that they receive delivery of any shares that they purchase, and also that their stock is not being borrowed without authorization.

Holly Roseberry, President of Whistler Investments, states ``We intend to get to the bottom of the excessive short position and bring stability back into the trading of our stock. We`re happy to say that we have 5,133 stockholders and we expect all our stockholders to benefit from the shorters having to cover their short positions.``

FinancialWire has reported on the disclosure that ``Dateline,`` the investigatory TV program aired by General Electric`s (NYSE: GE) NBC unit, has purportedly been preparing a blockbuster expose of ``Stockgate`` (see separate story at www.financialwire.net).

It is not known if ``Dateline`` has uncovered continuing underworld connections to the scandal, but FinancialWire reported that Dateline may be pointing a large finger of conflict at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission itself, which reportedly receives a slice of every transaction fee as part of its budget. According to court filings supported by the O`Quinn/Christian legal network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its ``Stock Borrow Program,`` which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been ``listing`` the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control ``Stock Borrow Program`` run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to ``outlaw`` ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The rule proposal would bar stock transfer agents from handling shares that carry any limitations on transfer. Control over stock certificates is one of the ways that small companies have combated illegal naked short sellers. Burns quoted Nazareth as saying that these companies` ``self-help`` efforts ``aren`t helping U.S. markets overall.`` Nazareth was quoted as saying restrictions on stocks are ``a significant step backwards`` in the ``move from paper stock certificates to automated computerized trading.``

Nazareth said that abusive ``naked`` short selling has been a problem ``in some cases,`` but that is ``best dealt with by a pending SEC proposal,`` presumably Regulation SHO.

SEC Commissioner William Donaldson purportedly publicly refused to answer any questions from the NASD about the timing of the Commission`s consideration of the Regulation at a conference where he was simultaneously proposing early reforms of the mutual fund scandals. The Dow Jones said, however, that Robert Colby, SEC deputy market regulation division director, predicted the SEC will take that to a vote in early June.

The Dow Jones report noted that ``naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The stock certiticate plan has been put to a 30-day comment periodl Then the SEC would have to vote to adopt it. If adopted, Colby was quoted as saying that regulators might ``sue firms that seek to impose restrictions on stock transfers.``

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. ``Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors,`` and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been ``shorted out of existence over the past six years.`` Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the ``sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy.``

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O`Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Recently the NASD and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved an interim naked short-selling band-aid, requiring U.S. brokers to make an ``affirmative determination`` that short-sellers, even foreign short-sellers, mostly Canadian, can find certificates to cover before processing the order.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on July 23, 2003, the SEC stated ``the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means.``

The Nanopierce lawsuit, said to be the first of many out of the box, emphatically suggests otherwise. According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively ``dematerializing`` most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in ``custody.``

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the ``Stock Borrow Program.``

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. ``There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times,`` giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

``Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential `float` in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term `float` meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence.`` Burrell said the Christian/O`Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the ``counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the `Sale of Unregistered Securities`.``

While the Nanopierce lawsuit has been filed at the state level, another companion lawsuit just heading to the courts on behalf of Exotics.com (OTC: EXII) will be argued at the Federal level.

Nanopierce`s suit in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Nevada, is Case No. CV04-01079, alleges that the DTC`s ``stock borrow program`` was ``purportedly created to address SHORT TERM delivery failures,`` but that the ``end result of the program has been to create tens of millions of unissued and unregistered shares to be traded in the public market,`` and in some instances resulting in ``two or more shareholders who purchase shares in separate transactions to own the same shares.``

The complaint alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the ``stock borrow`` program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that ``open positions`` resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, ``approximated $3,025,467,000`` due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC`s ``Stock Borrow Program.``

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a ``scheme`` to ``manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions.`` The suit also claims that the defendants have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that ``concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity.``

Nanopierce claims that it had ``relied on material misrepresentations and omissions by DTC and NSCC in trading its shares in the stock market ``without knowledge of Defendants` fraud-on-the market through statements they made about the clearing and settlement services they provided.`` Further, it claims that the Defendants acted with ``scienter`` since they had a major financial financial motivation to falsely represent their services, which Nanopierce claims are also anticompetitive.

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC`s July 23 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.`s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned ``NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition.``

As the Nanopierce lawsuit reveals, those were indeed strong words, meddling as it did, in a substantial revenues base for the DTCC.

Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group, Bank of America`s (NYSE: BAC) Banc of America Securities LLC, Societe Generale`s (OTC: SCGLF) SG Cowen Securities Corp. vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN), Knight Trading Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NITE), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had ``sat on`` the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.

``The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD (``non-member broker/dealers``).

The new rule is on the web at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD`s request to put it into effect had set on a shelf at the SEC since 2001.

The scandal has embroiled hundreds of companies and dozens of brokers and marketmakers, in a web of internaitional intrigue, manipulative short-selling and cross-border acctions and denials.

Comments on Regulation SHO ended January 5, and may be viewed at www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303.shtml .

Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Knight (NASDAQ: NITE) and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy

The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.

The complete list of those 108 companies include Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTCBB: ADVR), AdZone Research, Inc. (OTCBB: ADZR), Amazon Natural Treasures (OTC: ANTD), America`s Senior Financial Services (OTCBB: AMSE), American Ammunition, Inc. (OTCBB: AAMI), AngelCiti Entertainment (OTCBB: AGLC), ATSI Communications, Inc. (OTC: ATSC), Federal Agricultural Mortgage / Farmer Mac (NYSE: AGM) Allied Capital (NYSE: ALD), American Motorcycle (OTC: AMCYV), American International Industries (OTCBB: AMIN), Ameri-Dream (OTC: AMDR), Adirondack Pure Springs Mt. Water Co. (OTCBB: APSW), ATSI Communications,Inc. (OTC: ATSC) Bluebook International (OTCBB: BBIC), Blue Industries (OTCBB: BLIIV), Bentley Communications (OTCBB: BTLY), BIFS Technologies Corporation (OTCBB: BIFT), Biocurex (OTCBB: BOCX). Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (OTCBB: BDLF), Chattem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTT), Critical Home Care (OTCBB: CCLH), Composite Holdings (OTC: COHIA), CyberDigital, Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD). Diamond International Group (OTCBB: DMND), Dobson Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: DCEL), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC), Edgetech Services (OTCBB: EDGH);

Also, Endovasc Ltd. (OTCBB: EVSC), Enviro-Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ENGY), Environmental Products & Technologies (OTC: EPTC), Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (OTCBB: ESWW), EPIXTAR Corp. (OTCBB: EPXR), eResearchTechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES), Flight Safety Technologies (OTCBB: FLST), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), FreeStar Technologies (OTCBB: FSRCE), Front Porch Digital,

Inc. (OTCBB: FPDI), Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (OTCBB: GETC), Genesis Intermedia (OTC: GENI), GeneMax Corp. (OTCBB: GMXX), Global Explorations Inc (OTC: GXXL), Global Path (OTCBB: GBPI), GloTech Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: GTHI), Green Dolphin Systems (OTCBB: GLDS), Group Management (OTCBB: GPMT), Hop-On (OTC: HPON), H-Quotient, Inc., (OTCBB: HQNT), Hyperdynamics Corp. (OTCBB: HYPD), International Biochem (OTCBB: IBCL), Intergold Corp. (OTCBB: IGCO), International Broadcasting Corporation (OTCBB: IBCS), InternetStudios, Inc. (OTCBB: ISTO), ITIS Holdings (OTCBB: ITHH), Investco Corp. (OTCBB: IVCO), Lair Holdings (OTC: LAIR), Lifeline BioTechnologies Inc. (OTC: LBTT), Life Energy & Technology (OTCBB: LETH), MBIA (NYSE: MBI);

Also, MegaMania Interactive (OTC: MNIA), MetaSource Group, Inc. (OTCBB: MTSR),Midastrade.com (OTC: MIDS), Make Your Move (OTCBB: MKMV), Medinah Minerals (OTC: MDMN), MSM Jewelry Corp. (OTC: MSMC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NPCT), Nutra Pharmaceutical (OTCBB: NPHC), Nutek (OTCBB: NUTK), Navigator Ventures (OTC: NVGV), Orbit E-Commerce, Inc. (OTCBB: OECI), Pitts & Spitts (OTC: PSPP), Sales OnLine Direct (OTCBB: PAID), Pacel Corp. (OTCBB: PACC), PayStar Corporation (OTC: PYST),Petrogen Corp. (OTCBB: PTGC), Pinnacle Business Management (OTC: PCBM), Premier Development & Investment, Inc. (OTCBB: PDVN), PrimeHoldings.com, Inc. (OTC: PRIM), Phlo Corporation (OTCBB: PHLC), Resourcing Solutions (OTC: RESG), Reed Holdings (OTC: RDHC), Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. (OTCBB: RMECE), RTIN Holdings (OTCBB: RTNHE), Saflink Corp. (NASDAQ: SFLK), Safe Travel Care (OTCBB: SFTVV), Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA);

Also, Sionix Corp. (OTCBB: SINX), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Starmax Technologies (OTC: SMXIF), Storage Suites America (OTC: SSUA), Suncomm Technologies (OTC: STEH), Sports Resorts International (NASDAQ: SPRI), Technology Logistics (OTC: TLOS), Swiss Medica, Inc. (OTCBB: SWME), Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB: TNTI), Tidelands Oil (OTCBB: TIDE), Titan Construction (OTC: TTCS), Trezac Corp. (OTCBB: TRZAV), Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP), Valesc Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: VLSHV), Vega Atlantic (OTCBB: VGAC), Viragen (AMEX: VRA), Viragen International (OTCBB: VGNI), Vista Continental Corporation, (OTCBB: VICC), Viva International (OTCBB: VIVI), Vtex Energy (OTCBB: VXENE) and Wizzard Software (OTCBB: WIZD), WorldTradeShow.com (OTC: WTSW) and Y3K Secure Enterprise Software, Inc. (OTCBB: YTHK).

Earlier in 2003, the SEC fined Rhino Advisors, Inc., $1 million for its representation of Amro International in the financing and manipulation of Sedona Corp. Amro, also known as AMRO, was registered in Panama, a secretive offshore haven, but was not named in the SEC settlement. Another 60 public companies may have been manipulated by the fined Rhino Advisors and its indicted principals, or its funding apparatus, Amro.

These include:

All American Food Group Inc (OTC: AAFGQ), Amanda Co Inc (OTC: AMNA), Antra Holdings (OTC: RECD), Aquis Communications Group Inc (OTCBB: AQUIS), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (AMEX: AVN), Bionutrics Inc (OTC: BNRX), Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc (AMEX: BDE), Bravo! Foods International Corp. (OTCBB: BRVOE), Butler National Corp (NASDAQ: BUTL),Calypte Biomedical Corp (OTCBB: CYPT), Chemtrak Inc/DE (OTC: CMTR), Clicknsettle Com Inc (OTCBB: CLIK), Corporate Vision Inc (OTC: CVIA), Crown Laboratories Inc/DE (OTC: CLWB), Dental Medical Diagnostic Systems Inc (OTC: DMDS), Detour Media Group Inc (OTC: DTRM),

Also, Digital Privacy Inc/DE (OTC: DGPV), Senior Services Inc (OTC: DISS), International Inc (OTC: DYNX), Endovasc Ltd Inc (OTCBB: EVSC), Esynch Corp/CA (OTCBB: ESYN), Focus Enhancements Inc (NASDAQ: FSCE), Frederick Brewing Co (OTC: FRBW), Greystone Digital Technology Inc (OTC: GSTN), Havana Republic Inc/FL (OTCBB: HVNR), Henley Healthcare Inc (OTC: HENL), Hollywood Media Corp (NASDAQ: HOLL), Ibiz Technology Corp (OTCBB: IBZT), Diagnostic Systems Inc/FL (OTCBB: IMDS), Imaging Technologies (OTCBB: IMTO), Integrated Surgical Systems Inc (OTCBB: RDOC),

Also, Interferon Sciences Inc (OTC: IFSC), Interiors Inc (OTC: ITRNA), Laminaire Corp (OTC: THMZ), Medisys Technologies Inc (OTC: SCEP), Milestone Scientific Inc/NJ (AMEX: MS), Nevada Manhattan Group Inc (OTC: NVMH), Innovations Inc (OTCBB: NTGE),Systems Group (OTC: OSYM), Pacific Systems Control Technology Inc (OTCBB: PFSY), Professional Transportation Group Ltd Inc (OTC: TRUC), Rnethealth Inc (OTC: RNTT),

Also, Sand Technology Inc (NASDAQ: SNDT), Sedona Corp (OTCBB: SDNA), Silverado Foods Inc (OTC: SVFO), Stockgroup Information Systems (OTCBB: SWEB) Surgilight Inc (OTC: SRGL), Tasty Fries Inc (OTCBB: TFRY), Tech Laboratories Inc (OTCBB: TCHL), Teltran International Group Ltd (OTC: TLTG), Titan Motorcycle Co of America Inc (OTC: TMOTQ), Trans Energy Inc (OTCBB: TSRG), Motorcycle Co (OTC: UMCC), Universal Communication Systems Inc (OTCBB: UCSY), Medical Systems Inc (OTC: UMSI), Vianet Technologies Inc (OTC: VNTK),Viragen Inc (AMEX: VRA), Webcatalyst Inc (OTC: WBCL), Worldwide Wireless Networks Inc (OTCBB: WWWNQ), and ZAP (OTCBB: ZAPZ).

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on www.financialwire.net

[Strait1]

@kaliho

ich habe im Moment keinen Urlaub und habe keine Zeit mir das alles durchzulesen. Gehts um NPCT ?

[Katzennarr]

Eine kurze Zusammenfassung wäre nett, bitte.

[DMKE]

ich denke, da ist so langsam ein boden gefunden.
bei steigenden börsen wirds auch hier wieder aufwärts gehen

[Strait1]

Strohfeuer ?

[colombotaner]

http://www.investors.com/breakingnews.asp?journalid=21660437…

könnte jemand bitte dieses in verständliche Worte übersetzen

Danke

[colombotaner]

#3130
ziemlich weit unten im Text wird NPCT mit aufgezählt

[ToSky]

Ist aber doch vom 16.06.

[colombotaner]

weiss du worum es da geht?

[ToSky]

Es geht da wiedermal um die naked short selling-Geschichte.
Aber erklären kann ich das auch nicht.

[Rob2303]

der kurs wird über berlin gemacht.
die werden sich noch wundern.
konten werden sicherlich bald eingefroren und
dann ....... wird einer der größten finanzskandale
der geschichte aufgedeckt.

die hoffnung stirbt zuletzt.

[kaliho]

@Rob

die Hoffnung auf ????????

[kaliho]

fuer alle die englisch lesen.........

StockGate: DTCC Sued Again, $49M Suit Related To Elgindy; NASD Expels,Censures

Jul 28, 2004 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has been sued again, this time along with Anthony Elgindy, Schwab Capital Markets (NYSE: SCH), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), and Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC), for a total of $49 million.

In other StockGate activities, the NASD has expelled Ryan & Company, LP (RYCO) of West Conshohoken, PA, for failure to cooperate in an ongoing investigation into whether Ryan and the firm engaged in a widespread scheme of impermissible short selling activity on behalf of three hedge fund clients, and Track Data Securities of Brooklyn has been censured and fined $15,000 for accepting customer short sale orders in certain securities and, for each order, "failing to

make/annotate an affirmative determination that the firm would receive delivery of the security on behalf of the customer or that the firm could borrow the security on behalf of the customer for delivery by settlement date."

The lawsuit, #04-CV-80403, Capece v. Elgindy, et al, was filed in the Southern District of Florida in West Palm Beach. The plaintiff is Louis R. Capece Jr., represented by Robert Charles Stone. It has been assigned to Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp and is expected to be heard by a jury.

In addition to those named, defendants include THE ELGINDY SITES, ROBERT HANSEN ELGINDY, BRADLEY ABELOW, MICHAEL C. BODSON, JONATHAN E. BEYMAN, FRANK J. BISIGNANO, STEPHENS P. CASPER, JILL M. CONSIDINE, PAUL F. COSTELLO, DONALD F. DONAHUE, MARY M. FENOGLIO, GEORGE HRABOVSHY, RONALD J. KESSLER, CATHERINE KINNEY, PETER B. MADOFF, EILEEN K. MURRAY,.JAMES P. PALERMO, THOMAS J. PERNA, RONALD PURPORA, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, ROBERT H. SILVER, DENNIS J. DIRKS, THOMPSON M. SWAYNE;

Also, KNIGHT SECURITIES, LP, SCHWAB CAPITAL MARKETS, L.P., LEEDS AND KELLOG, M. H. MYERSON, MORGAN STANLEY, GLOBAL SECURITIES OF CANADA, E-TRADE, FIERO BROTHERS, TD-WATERHOUSE, JEFFERIES & COMPANY , INC., BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., Holly Robin Skolnick, Eliot Pedrosa, David E. Koropp, FLORIDA DISCOUNT BROKERS, PACIFIC SECURITIES OF CANADA, FLEET TRADING, INSTINET CORP., GRUNTAL & COMPANY, ARCHIPELAGO LLC, ING BARINGS FURMAN SELZ, FIRST BERMUDA, DLJ, DATEK, SHERWOOD SECURITIES, and DREYFUS BROKERAGE SERVICES.

Charles Schwab & Co. recently said it is exiting the market-making business. It is one of several market makers that have been the subject of accusations and/or legal entanglements over naked shorting allegations and issues.

The company had said it is either the number one or number two market-maker in more than half of all of NASDAQ`s (OTCBB: NDAQ) listed stocks.

Recently observers were surprised to find a comment letter submitted to the SEC by Mike Alexander, Senior VP of Charles Schwab, that admits outright that brokerages regularly ignore rules and regulations, saying it is not rules that need to be written; it is changes in behavior that is needed.

The comments were directed towards proposed changes in the U.S. settlement system, but could easily apply to other regulations as well.

"Improvements in the U.S. settlement system will only be truly achieved if and when regulations are rationalized to ensure that all market participants are held accountable for compliance. For example, the industry has struggled with the issue of institutional trade affirmation for quite some time now. While the benefits to the clearance and settlement system are self-evident, Buy-Side firms and Custodian banks have been resistant to make those changes that provide for same-day trade confirmation / affirmation and assurance of trade settlement," said Alexander.

"Schwab opposes the notion that securities intermediaries such as broker-dealers be required to police compliance," he stated. "The NYSE and other SROs have had trade affirmation rules on their books for some time. However, such rules have not been effective in changing the behavior

of Buy-Side firms or their custodians; nor do the rules provide assurance that the affirmed trade will settle.

"Recognition of this fact is evidence that changes to the settlement cycle not only require overhauling systems, but also changing behavior. We believe that only by holding all market

participants directly accountable for making required affirmations will the necessary changes to behavior," he stated at www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s71304/charlesschwab061604.pdf .

In a June 23 release, the SEC stated it has put into place Rule 202(T), which establishes procedures to allow the Commission to temporarily suspend the operation of the current "tick" test in Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for specified securities.

Through a separate order, the Commission will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one-year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for approximately one-third of stocks in the Russell 3000 index.

The order also will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1 for short sales executed in any security included in the Russell 1000 index after 4:15 p.m. Eastern, and all other securities after the close of the consolidated tape, and until the open of the consolidated tape the next day.

The pilot will commence on January 3, 2005 to permit broker-dealers and self-regulatory organizations to make the necessary programming adjustments.

The Commission deferred consideration of the proposal to replace the current "tick" test of Rule 10a-1 with a new uniform bid test. The Commission could reconsider any further action on these proposals after the completion of the pilot.

Rule 203, which will incorporate current Rule 10a-2 and will create a uniform Commission rule requiring broker-dealers, prior to effecting short sales in all equity securities, to "locate" securities available for borrowing.

There will be limited exceptions from the locate requirement, including for short sales by registered market makers in connection with bona-fide market making.

Rule 203 also imposes additional requirements on designated "threshold securities." Rule 203 defines a threshold security to mean an equity security for which there is an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more and that is equal to at least 0.5% of the issue`s total shares outstanding.

Where a clearing agency participant has a fail to deliver position in threshold securities that persists for ten consecutive days after settlement, the participant must take action to close out the position. Until the position is closed out, the participant, and any broker-dealer for which it clears transactions, may not effect further short sales in the particular threshold security without borrowing or entering into a bona fide arrangement to borrow the security.

Rule 203 will become effective 30 days after publication with a compliance date of January 3, 2005, to permit firms to make programming and procedural adjustments.

Rule 200, which among other things, will redesignate current Rule 3b-3 with some modifications to define ownership and aggregation of securities positions, and include a requirement to mark all sell orders in all equity securities. Rule 200 will become effective 30 days after publication.

The Commission also adopted amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M to remove the current shelf offering exception, and issued interpretive guidance addressing sham transactions designed to evade the rule.

The amendment applies to short sales effected within five days prior to the pricing of a shelf offering. Such short sales may not be covered with offering securities purchased from an underwriter or other broker-dealer participating in the offering.

The Rule 105 amendments will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and the interpretive guidance will be effective upon such publication.

Opponents of naked short selling were, however, quick to denounce the provision that allows market makers an exemption, and many market observers said that the SEC should provide a public list of companies that fall into the "threshold security" category.

"The SEC claims that the number of companies involved in this `threshold security` category is 4% of all publicly traded companies. If in fact it is that small the process is certainly manageable," said the website InvestigatetheSEC.com at www.investigatethesec.com . "It is also the right of every issuer, in protecting their business and their investors to know the status of their stock trading."

Some were discussing whether the SEC can keep such information private under the Freedom of Information Act.

The marketplace is already upset over promises by the Berlin Stock Exchange, since broken, that it would delist any company upon request.

"Please understand that cessation of trading in the shares of XRAYMEDIA Inc. (OTCBB: XRYM) is not possible," the exchange told one such requester.

It`s not just U.S. companies such as Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), and eLinear Inc. (AMEX: ELU) or Israeli companies that have had serious concerns about their unannounced and unathrorized listings on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange.

Apparently, some 150 British companies are protesting the same fate.

A number of UK-listed companies have demanded a London Stock Exchange investigation after they found that their shares are being traded.

Meanwhile, Whistler, Sonoran and eLinear have announced they have successfully secured their delistings, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has rescheduled its open hearing to consider the adoption of amendments to Regulation Sho to July 28 at 9:30 a.m. The announcement is at www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig061504.txt .

According to the London Money Telegraph, "several companies believe the market for their shares has been distorted and that they have fallen in value after trading started on the Berlin-Bremen exchange.

"Some smaller companies, whose shares are lightly traded in London, fear the Berlin market has been used by speculators to short-sell their shares."

The Telegraph said the number of companies are thought to be as high as 150, including even "larger companies" such as Matalan (OTC: MATNF) and Halfords.

Mladen Ninkov, the chairman of Aim-listed Griffin Mining (OTC: GFNMF), was quoted as saying: "We were put on the Berlin market without our knowledge by a German broker and now we`ve got about 8m shares out in a short sale. It is horrifying - that is about 4 per cent of the company and it is forcing the price down."

A spokesman for the London Stock Exchange said: "If there is evidence of market abuse we would refer that on to the appropriate authorities."

Whistler said that according to its transfer agent records, "we have 5,504,680 shares held by DTC, but the ADP broker search indicates of 6,217,458 shares being reported by broker/dealers as being held on behalf of their customers, indicating a short position of more than 700,000 shares. A summary report can be viewed at www.whistlerinvestments.com/shorts.html .

"We have therefore commenced work with DTC for a formal review of the reported excessive broker/dealer holdings of our stock so that we can conduct our corporate affairs properly in view of our planned stockholders meeting and other upcoming corporate matters. We again advise our stockholders make sure that they receive delivery of any shares that they purchase, and also that their stock is not being borrowed without authorization.

Holly Roseberry, President of Whistler Investments, states "We intend to get to the bottom of the excessive short position and bring stability back into the trading of our stock. We`re happy to say that we have 5,133 stockholders and we expect all our stockholders to benefit from the shorters having to cover their short positions."

FinancialWire has reported on the disclosure that "Dateline," the investigatory TV program aired by General Electric`s (NYSE: GE) NBC unit, has purportedly been preparing a blockbuster expose of "Stockgate" (see separate story at www.financialwire.net).

It is not known if "Dateline" has uncovered continuing underworld connections to the scandal, but FinancialWire reported that Dateline may be pointing a large finger of conflict at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission itself, which reportedly receives a slice of every transaction fee as part of its budget. According to court filings supported by the O`Quinn/Christian legal network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its "Stock Borrow Program," which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been "listing" the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control "Stock Borrow Program" run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to "outlaw" ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The rule proposal would bar stock transfer agents from handling shares that carry any limitations on transfer. Control over stock certificates is one of the ways that small companies have combated illegal naked short sellers. Burns quoted Nazareth as saying that these companies` "self-help" efforts "aren`t helping U.S. markets overall." Nazareth was quoted as saying restrictions on stocks are "a significant step backwards" in the "move from paper stock certificates to automated computerized trading."

Nazareth said that abusive "naked" short selling has been a problem "in some cases," but that is "best dealt with by a pending SEC proposal," presumably Regulation SHO.

SEC Commissioner William Donaldson purportedly publicly refused to answer any questions from the NASD about the timing of the Commission`s consideration of the Regulation at a conference where he was simultaneously proposing early reforms of the mutual fund scandals. The Dow Jones said, however, that Robert Colby, SEC deputy market regulation division director, predicted the SEC will take that to a vote in early June.

The Dow Jones report noted that "naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The stock certiticate plan has been put to a 30-day comment periodl Then the SEC would have to vote to adopt it. If adopted, Colby was quoted as saying that regulators might "sue firms that seek to impose restrictions on stock transfers."

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. "Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors," and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been "shorted out of existence over the past six years." Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the "sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy."

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O`Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Recently the NASD and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved an interim naked short-selling band-aid, requiring U.S. brokers to make an "affirmative determination" that short-sellers, even foreign short-sellers, mostly Canadian, can find certificates to cover before processing the order.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on July 28, 2003, the SEC stated "the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means."

The Nanopierce lawsuit, said to be the first of many out of the box, emphatically suggests otherwise. According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively "dematerializing" most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in "custody."

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the "Stock Borrow Program."

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. "There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times," giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

"Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential `float` in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term `float` meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence." Burrell said the Christian/O`Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the "counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the `Sale of Unregistered Securities`."

While the Nanopierce lawsuit has been filed at the state level, another companion lawsuit just heading to the courts on behalf of Exotics.com (OTC: EXII) will be argued at the Federal level.

Nanopierce`s suit in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Nevada, is Case No. CV04-01079, alleges that the DTC`s "stock borrow program" was "purportedly created to address SHORT TERM delivery failures," but that the "end result of the program has been to create tens of millions of unissued and unregistered shares to be traded in the public market," and in some instances resulting in "two or more shareholders who purchase shares in separate transactions to own the same shares."

The complaint alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the "stock borrow" program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that "open positions" resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, "approximated $3,025,467,000" due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC`s "Stock Borrow Program."

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a "scheme" to "manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions." The suit also claims that the s have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that "concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity."

Nanopierce claims that it had "relied on material misrepresentations and omissions by DTC and NSCC in trading its shares in the stock market "without knowledge of s` fraud-on-the market through statements they made about the clearing and settlement services they provided." Further, it claims that the s acted with "scienter" since they had a major financial financial motivation to falsely represent their services, which Nanopierce claims are also anticompetitive.

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC`s July 28 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.`s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned "NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition."

As the Nanopierce lawsuit reveals, those were indeed strong words, meddling as it did, in a substantial revenues base for the DTCC.

Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group, Bank of America`s (NYSE: BAC) Banc of America Securities LLC, Societe Generale`s (OTC: SCGLF) SG Cowen Securities Corp. vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN), Knight Trading Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NITE), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had "sat on" the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.

"The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD ("non-member broker/dealers").

The new rule is on the web at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD`s request to put it into effect had set on a shelf at the SEC since 2001.

The scandal has embroiled hundreds of companies and dozens of brokers and marketmakers, in a web of internaitional intrigue, manipulative short-selling and cross-border acctions and denials.

Comments on Regulation SHO ended January 5, and may be viewed at www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303.shtml .

Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Knight (NASDAQ: NITE) and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy

The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.

The complete list of those 108 companies include Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTCBB: ADVR), AdZone Research, Inc. (OTCBB: ADZR), Amazon Natural Treasures (OTC: ANTD), America`s Senior Financial Services (OTCBB: AMSE), American Ammunition, Inc. (OTCBB: AAMI), AngelCiti Entertainment (OTCBB: AGLC), ATSI Communications, Inc. (OTC: ATSC), Federal Agricultural Mortgage / Farmer Mac (NYSE: AGM) Allied Capital (NYSE: ALD), American Motorcycle (OTC: AMCYV), American International Industries (OTCBB: AMIN), Ameri-Dream (OTC: AMDR), Adirondack Pure Springs Mt. Water Co. (OTCBB: APSW), ATSI Communications,Inc. (OTC: ATSC) Bluebook International (OTCBB: BBIC), Blue Industries (OTCBB: BLIIV), Bentley Communications (OTCBB: BTLY), BIFS Technologies Corporation (OTCBB: BIFT), Biocurex (OTCBB: BOCX). Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (OTCBB: BDLF), Chattem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTT), Critical Home Care (OTCBB: CCLH), Composite Holdings (OTC: COHIA), CyberDigital, Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD). Diamond International Group (OTCBB: DMND), Dobson Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: DCEL), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC), Edgetech Services (OTCBB: EDGH);

Also, Endovasc Ltd. (OTCBB: EVSC), Enviro-Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ENGY), Environmental Products & Technologies (OTC: EPTC), Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (OTCBB: ESWW), EPIXTAR Corp. (OTCBB: EPXR), eResearchTechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES), Flight Safety Technologies (OTCBB: FLST), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), FreeStar Technologies (OTCBB: FSRCE), Front Porch Digital,

Inc. (OTCBB: FPDI), Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (OTCBB: GETC), Genesis Intermedia (OTC: GENI), GeneMax Corp. (OTCBB: GMXX), Global Explorations Inc (OTC: GXXL), Global Path (OTCBB: GBPI), GloTech Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: GTHI), Green Dolphin Systems (OTCBB: GLDS), Group Management (OTCBB: GPMT), Hop-On (OTC: HPON), H-Quotient, Inc., (OTCBB: HQNT), Hyperdynamics Corp. (OTCBB: HYPD), International Biochem (OTCBB: IBCL), Intergold Corp. (OTCBB: IGCO), International Broadcasting Corporation (OTCBB: IBCS), InternetStudios, Inc. (OTCBB: ISTO), ITIS Holdings (OTCBB: ITHH), Investco Corp. (OTCBB: IVCO), Lair Holdings (OTC: LAIR), Lifeline BioTechnologies Inc. (OTC: LBTT), Life Energy & Technology (OTCBB: LETH), MBIA (NYSE: MBI);

Also, MegaMania Interactive (OTC: MNIA), MetaSource Group, Inc. (OTCBB: MTSR),Midastrade.com (OTC: MIDS), Make Your Move (OTCBB: MKMV), Medinah Minerals (OTC: MDMN), MSM Jewelry Corp. (OTC: MSMC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NPCT), Nutra Pharmaceutical (OTCBB: NPHC), Nutek (OTCBB: NUTK), Navigator Ventures (OTC: NVGV), Orbit E-Commerce, Inc. (OTCBB: OECI), Pitts & Spitts (OTC: PSPP), Sales OnLine Direct (OTCBB: PAID), Pacel Corp. (OTCBB: PACC), PayStar Corporation (OTC: PYST),Petrogen Corp. (OTCBB: PTGC), Pinnacle Business Management (OTC: PCBM), Premier Development & Investment, Inc. (OTCBB: PDVN), PrimeHoldings.com, Inc. (OTC: PRIM), Phlo Corporation (OTCBB: PHLC), Resourcing Solutions (OTC: RESG), Reed Holdings (OTC: RDHC), Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. (OTCBB: RMECE), RTIN Holdings (OTCBB: RTNHE), Saflink Corp. (NASDAQ: SFLK), Safe Travel Care (OTCBB: SFTVV), Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA);

Also, Sionix Corp. (OTCBB: SINX), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Starmax Technologies (OTC: SMXIF), Storage Suites America (OTC: SSUA), Suncomm Technologies (OTC: STEH), Sports Resorts International (NASDAQ: SPRI), Technology Logistics (OTC: TLOS), Swiss Medica, Inc. (OTCBB: SWME), Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB: TNTI), Tidelands Oil (OTCBB: TIDE), Titan Construction (OTC: TTCS), Trezac Corp. (OTCBB: TRZAV), Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP), Valesc Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: VLSHV), Vega Atlantic (OTCBB: VGAC), Viragen (AMEX: VRA), Viragen International (OTCBB: VGNI), Vista Continental Corporation, (OTCBB: VICC), Viva International (OTCBB: VIVI), Vtex Energy (OTCBB: VXENE) and Wizzard Software (OTCBB: WIZD), WorldTradeShow.com (OTC: WTSW) and Y3K Secure Enterprise Software, Inc. (OTCBB: YTHK).

Earlier in 2003, the SEC fined Rhino Advisors, Inc., $1 million for its representation of Amro International in the financing and manipulation of Sedona Corp. Amro, also known as AMRO, was registered in Panama, a secretive offshore haven, but was not named in the SEC settlement. Another 60 public companies may have been manipulated by the fined Rhino Advisors and its indicted principals, or its funding apparatus, Amro.

These include:

All American Food Group Inc (OTC: AAFGQ), Amanda Co Inc (OTC: AMNA), Antra Holdings (OTC: RECD), Aquis Communications Group Inc (OTCBB: AQUIS), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (AMEX: AVN), Bionutrics Inc (OTC: BNRX), Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc (AMEX: BDE), Bravo! Foods International Corp. (OTCBB: BRVOE), Butler National Corp (NASDAQ: BUTL),Calypte Biomedical Corp (OTCBB: CYPT), Chemtrak Inc/DE (OTC: CMTR), Clicknsettle Com Inc (OTCBB: CLIK), Corporate Vision Inc (OTC: CVIA), Crown Laboratories Inc/DE (OTC: CLWB), Dental Medical Diagnostic Systems Inc (OTC: DMDS), Detour Media Group Inc (OTC: DTRM),

Also, Digital Privacy Inc/DE (OTC: DGPV), Senior Services Inc (OTC: DISS), International Inc (OTC: DYNX), Endovasc Ltd Inc (OTCBB: EVSC), Esynch Corp/CA (OTCBB: ESYN), Focus Enhancements Inc (NASDAQ: FSCE), Frederick Brewing Co (OTC: FRBW), Greystone Digital Technology Inc (OTC: GSTN), Havana Republic Inc/FL (OTCBB: HVNR), Henley Healthcare Inc (OTC: HENL), Hollywood Media Corp (NASDAQ: HOLL), Ibiz Technology Corp (OTCBB: IBZT), Diagnostic Systems Inc/FL (OTCBB: IMDS), Imaging Technologies (OTCBB: IMTO), Integrated Surgical Systems Inc (OTCBB: RDOC),

Also, Interferon Sciences Inc (OTC: IFSC), Interiors Inc (OTC: ITRNA), Laminaire Corp (OTC: THMZ), Medisys Technologies Inc (OTC: SCEP), Milestone Scientific Inc/NJ (AMEX: MS), Nevada Manhattan Group Inc (OTC: NVMH), Innovations Inc (OTCBB: NTGE),Systems Group (OTC: OSYM), Pacific Systems Control Technology Inc (OTCBB: PFSY), Professional Transportation Group Ltd Inc (OTC: TRUC), Rnethealth Inc (OTC: RNTT),

Also, Sand Technology Inc (NASDAQ: SNDT), Sedona Corp (OTCBB: SDNA), Silverado Foods Inc (OTC: SVFO), Stockgroup Information Systems (OTCBB: SWEB) Surgilight Inc (OTC: SRGL), Tasty Fries Inc (OTCBB: TFRY), Tech Laboratories Inc (OTCBB: TCHL), Teltran International Group Ltd (OTC: TLTG), Titan Motorcycle Co of America Inc (OTC: TMOTQ), Trans Energy Inc (OTCBB: TSRG), Motorcycle Co (OTC: UMCC), Universal Communication Systems Inc (OTCBB: UCSY), Medical Systems Inc (OTC: UMSI), Vianet Technologies Inc (OTC: VNTK),Viragen Inc (AMEX: VRA), Webcatalyst Inc (OTC: WBCL), Worldwide Wireless Networks Inc (OTCBB: WWWNQ), and ZAP (OTCBB: ZAPZ).

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on www.financialwire.net

[ToSky]

Wollte mal wissen ob die noch leben ,bei Nanopierce.
Hat ganz schön gedauert,musste 3 Mails versenden,erst als ich richtig sauer war ,hat es geklappt.Das war meine 2.Mail.



Dear xxx,
In order to avoid potential bankruptcy in January we closed on the
previously announced financing. The investors have been putting a lot of
pressure on the stock with their sales which accounts for the decline.
We are still pursuing potential acquisitions for NanoPierce to rebuild the
company.
Best Regards,
Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: xxx [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:40 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Question

Hello
Why you don`t answer me .I`ll write you a mail last time.
And what is happening with Nanopierce ,the stock goes down and down.
So please try to explain me.
Greetings xxx

[ToSky]

Der Paul ist schone Einer ,man vergleiche die Mail mit dem letzten Interview.

[kaliho]

das letzte interview ist meiner meinung nach immer noch der letzte stand der dinge.

es sieht nach einer neuen bodenbildung aus. bald geht`s wieder nach oben.

[mounteverest]

Alle Nanoaktien fallen seit 01/2004. Hier geht´s erst rauf, wenn ein neuer Nano-Hype kommt

[ToSky]

Heute geht es aber rauf, 0,13 in USA .

[ToSky]

0,13 zu 0,135

[libertyjean]

Subject: StockGate: DTCC Sued Again, $49M Suit Related To Elgindy; NASD Expels,Censures
From Kknightmcc
PostID 344896 On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 (EST) at 4:09:00 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

StockGate: DTCC Sued Again, $49M Suit Related To Elgindy; NASD Expels,Censures

Jul 28, 2004 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has been sued again, this time along with Anthony Elgindy, Schwab Capital Markets (NYSE: SCH), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), and Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC), for a total of $49 million.

In other StockGate activities, the NASD has expelled Ryan & Company, LP (RYCO) of West Conshohoken, PA, for failure to cooperate in an ongoing investigation into whether Ryan and the firm engaged in a widespread scheme of impermissible short selling activity on behalf of three hedge fund clients, and Track Data Securities of Brooklyn has been censured and fined $15,000 for accepting customer short sale orders in certain securities and, for each order, ``failing to

make/annotate an affirmative determination that the firm would receive delivery of the security on behalf of the customer or that the firm could borrow the security on behalf of the customer for delivery by settlement date.``

The lawsuit, #04-CV-80403, Capece v. Elgindy, et al, was filed in the Southern District of Florida in West Palm Beach. The plaintiff is Louis R. Capece Jr., represented by Robert Charles Stone. It has been assigned to Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp and is expected to be heard by a jury.

In addition to those named, defendants include THE ELGINDY SITES, ROBERT HANSEN ELGINDY, BRADLEY ABELOW, MICHAEL C. BODSON, JONATHAN E. BEYMAN, FRANK J. BISIGNANO, STEPHENS P. CASPER, JILL M. CONSIDINE, PAUL F. COSTELLO, DONALD F. DONAHUE, MARY M. FENOGLIO, GEORGE HRABOVSHY, RONALD J. KESSLER, CATHERINE KINNEY, PETER B. MADOFF, EILEEN K. MURRAY,.JAMES P. PALERMO, THOMAS J. PERNA, RONALD PURPORA, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, ROBERT H. SILVER, DENNIS J. DIRKS, THOMPSON M. SWAYNE;

Also, KNIGHT SECURITIES, LP, SCHWAB CAPITAL MARKETS, L.P., LEEDS AND KELLOG, M. H. MYERSON, MORGAN STANLEY, GLOBAL SECURITIES OF CANADA, E-TRADE, FIERO BROTHERS, TD-WATERHOUSE, JEFFERIES & COMPANY , INC., BEAR STEARNS & CO., INC., Holly Robin Skolnick, Eliot Pedrosa, David E. Koropp, FLORIDA DISCOUNT BROKERS, PACIFIC SECURITIES OF CANADA, FLEET TRADING, INSTINET CORP., GRUNTAL & COMPANY, ARCHIPELAGO LLC, ING BARINGS FURMAN SELZ, FIRST BERMUDA, DLJ, DATEK, SHERWOOD SECURITIES, and DREYFUS BROKERAGE SERVICES.

Charles Schwab & Co. recently said it is exiting the market-making business. It is one of several market makers that have been the subject of accusations and/or legal entanglements over naked shorting allegations and issues.

The company had said it is either the number one or number two market-maker in more than half of all of NASDAQ`s (OTCBB: NDAQ) listed stocks.

Recently observers were surprised to find a comment letter submitted to the SEC by Mike Alexander, Senior VP of Charles Schwab, that admits outright that brokerages regularly ignore rules and regulations, saying it is not rules that need to be written; it is changes in behavior that is needed.

The comments were directed towards proposed changes in the U.S. settlement system, but could easily apply to other regulations as well.

``Improvements in the U.S. settlement system will only be truly achieved if and when regulations are rationalized to ensure that all market participants are held accountable for compliance. For example, the industry has struggled with the issue of institutional trade affirmation for quite some time now. While the benefits to the clearance and settlement system are self-evident, Buy-Side firms and Custodian banks have been resistant to make those changes that provide for same-day trade confirmation / affirmation and assurance of trade settlement,`` said Alexander.

``Schwab opposes the notion that securities intermediaries such as broker-dealers be required to police compliance,`` he stated. ``The NYSE and other SROs have had trade affirmation rules on their books for some time. However, such rules have not been effective in changing the behavior

of Buy-Side firms or their custodians; nor do the rules provide assurance that the affirmed trade will settle.

``Recognition of this fact is evidence that changes to the settlement cycle not only require overhauling systems, but also changing behavior. We believe that only by holding all market

participants directly accountable for making required affirmations will the necessary changes to behavior,`` he stated at www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s71304/charlesschwab061604.pdf .

In a June 23 release, the SEC stated it has put into place Rule 202(T), which establishes procedures to allow the Commission to temporarily suspend the operation of the current ``tick`` test in Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for specified securities.

Through a separate order, the Commission will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one-year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1, and any short sale price test of any exchange or national securities association, for approximately one-third of stocks in the Russell 3000 index.

The order also will suspend, on a pilot basis for a period of one year, the tick test provision of paragraph (a) of Rule 10a-1 for short sales executed in any security included in the Russell 1000 index after 4:15 p.m. Eastern, and all other securities after the close of the consolidated tape, and until the open of the consolidated tape the next day.

The pilot will commence on January 3, 2005 to permit broker-dealers and self-regulatory organizations to make the necessary programming adjustments.

The Commission deferred consideration of the proposal to replace the current ``tick`` test of Rule 10a-1 with a new uniform bid test. The Commission could reconsider any further action on these proposals after the completion of the pilot.

Rule 203, which will incorporate current Rule 10a-2 and will create a uniform Commission rule requiring broker-dealers, prior to effecting short sales in all equity securities, to ``locate`` securities available for borrowing.

There will be limited exceptions from the locate requirement, including for short sales by registered market makers in connection with bona-fide market making.

Rule 203 also imposes additional requirements on designated ``threshold securities.`` Rule 203 defines a threshold security to mean an equity security for which there is an aggregate fail to deliver position for five consecutive settlement days at a registered clearing agency of 10,000 shares or more and that is equal to at least 0.5% of the issue`s total shares outstanding.

Where a clearing agency participant has a fail to deliver position in threshold securities that persists for ten consecutive days after settlement, the participant must take action to close out the position. Until the position is closed out, the participant, and any broker-dealer for which it clears transactions, may not effect further short sales in the particular threshold security without borrowing or entering into a bona fide arrangement to borrow the security.

Rule 203 will become effective 30 days after publication with a compliance date of January 3, 2005, to permit firms to make programming and procedural adjustments.

Rule 200, which among other things, will redesignate current Rule 3b-3 with some modifications to define ownership and aggregation of securities positions, and include a requirement to mark all sell orders in all equity securities. Rule 200 will become effective 30 days after publication.

The Commission also adopted amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M to remove the current shelf offering exception, and issued interpretive guidance addressing sham transactions designed to evade the rule.

The amendment applies to short sales effected within five days prior to the pricing of a shelf offering. Such short sales may not be covered with offering securities purchased from an underwriter or other broker-dealer participating in the offering.

The Rule 105 amendments will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and the interpretive guidance will be effective upon such publication.

Opponents of naked short selling were, however, quick to denounce the provision that allows market makers an exemption, and many market observers said that the SEC should provide a public list of companies that fall into the ``threshold security`` category.

``The SEC claims that the number of companies involved in this `threshold security` category is 4% of all publicly traded companies. If in fact it is that small the process is certainly manageable,`` said the website InvestigatetheSEC.com at www.investigatethesec.com . ``It is also the right of every issuer, in protecting their business and their investors to know the status of their stock trading.``

Some were discussing whether the SEC can keep such information private under the Freedom of Information Act.

The marketplace is already upset over promises by the Berlin Stock Exchange, since broken, that it would delist any company upon request.

``Please understand that cessation of trading in the shares of XRAYMEDIA Inc. (OTCBB: XRYM) is not possible,`` the exchange told one such requester.

It`s not just U.S. companies such as Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), and eLinear Inc. (AMEX: ELU) or Israeli companies that have had serious concerns about their unannounced and unathrorized listings on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange.

Apparently, some 150 British companies are protesting the same fate.

A number of UK-listed companies have demanded a London Stock Exchange investigation after they found that their shares are being traded.

Meanwhile, Whistler, Sonoran and eLinear have announced they have successfully secured their delistings, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has rescheduled its open hearing to consider the adoption of amendments to Regulation Sho to July 28 at 9:30 a.m. The announcement is at www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig061504.txt .

According to the London Money Telegraph, ``several companies believe the market for their shares has been distorted and that they have fallen in value after trading started on the Berlin-Bremen exchange.

``Some smaller companies, whose shares are lightly traded in London, fear the Berlin market has been used by speculators to short-sell their shares.``

The Telegraph said the number of companies are thought to be as high as 150, including even ``larger companies`` such as Matalan (OTC: MATNF) and Halfords.

Mladen Ninkov, the chairman of Aim-listed Griffin Mining (OTC: GFNMF), was quoted as saying: ``We were put on the Berlin market without our knowledge by a German broker and now we`ve got about 8m shares out in a short sale. It is horrifying - that is about 4 per cent of the company and it is forcing the price down.``

A spokesman for the London Stock Exchange said: ``If there is evidence of market abuse we would refer that on to the appropriate authorities.``

Whistler said that according to its transfer agent records, ``we have 5,504,680 shares held by DTC, but the ADP broker search indicates of 6,217,458 shares being reported by broker/dealers as being held on behalf of their customers, indicating a short position of more than 700,000 shares. A summary report can be viewed at www.whistlerinvestments.com/shorts.html .

``We have therefore commenced work with DTC for a formal review of the reported excessive broker/dealer holdings of our stock so that we can conduct our corporate affairs properly in view of our planned stockholders meeting and other upcoming corporate matters. We again advise our stockholders make sure that they receive delivery of any shares that they purchase, and also that their stock is not being borrowed without authorization.

Holly Roseberry, President of Whistler Investments, states ``We intend to get to the bottom of the excessive short position and bring stability back into the trading of our stock. We`re happy to say that we have 5,133 stockholders and we expect all our stockholders to benefit from the shorters having to cover their short positions.``

FinancialWire has reported on the disclosure that ``Dateline,`` the investigatory TV program aired by General Electric`s (NYSE: GE) NBC unit, has purportedly been preparing a blockbuster expose of ``Stockgate`` (see separate story at www.financialwire.net).

It is not known if ``Dateline`` has uncovered continuing underworld connections to the scandal, but FinancialWire reported that Dateline may be pointing a large finger of conflict at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission itself, which reportedly receives a slice of every transaction fee as part of its budget. According to court filings supported by the O`Quinn/Christian legal network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its ``Stock Borrow Program,`` which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been ``listing`` the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control ``Stock Borrow Program`` run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to ``outlaw`` ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The rule proposal would bar stock transfer agents from handling shares that carry any limitations on transfer. Control over stock certificates is one of the ways that small companies have combated illegal naked short sellers. Burns quoted Nazareth as saying that these companies` ``self-help`` efforts ``aren`t helping U.S. markets overall.`` Nazareth was quoted as saying restrictions on stocks are ``a significant step backwards`` in the ``move from paper stock certificates to automated computerized trading.``

Nazareth said that abusive ``naked`` short selling has been a problem ``in some cases,`` but that is ``best dealt with by a pending SEC proposal,`` presumably Regulation SHO.

SEC Commissioner William Donaldson purportedly publicly refused to answer any questions from the NASD about the timing of the Commission`s consideration of the Regulation at a conference where he was simultaneously proposing early reforms of the mutual fund scandals. The Dow Jones said, however, that Robert Colby, SEC deputy market regulation division director, predicted the SEC will take that to a vote in early June.

The Dow Jones report noted that ``naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The stock certiticate plan has been put to a 30-day comment periodl Then the SEC would have to vote to adopt it. If adopted, Colby was quoted as saying that regulators might ``sue firms that seek to impose restrictions on stock transfers.``

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. ``Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors,`` and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been ``shorted out of existence over the past six years.`` Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the ``sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy.``

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O`Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Recently the NASD and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approved an interim naked short-selling band-aid, requiring U.S. brokers to make an ``affirmative determination`` that short-sellers, even foreign short-sellers, mostly Canadian, can find certificates to cover before processing the order.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on July 28, 2003, the SEC stated ``the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means.``

The Nanopierce lawsuit, said to be the first of many out of the box, emphatically suggests otherwise. According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively ``dematerializing`` most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in ``custody.``

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the ``Stock Borrow Program.``

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. ``There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times,`` giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

``Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential `float` in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term `float` meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence.`` Burrell said the Christian/O`Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the ``counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the `Sale of Unregistered Securities`.``

While the Nanopierce lawsuit has been filed at the state level, another companion lawsuit just heading to the courts on behalf of Exotics.com (OTC: EXII) will be argued at the Federal level.

Nanopierce`s suit in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Nevada, is Case No. CV04-01079, alleges that the DTC`s ``stock borrow program`` was ``purportedly created to address SHORT TERM delivery failures,`` but that the ``end result of the program has been to create tens of millions of unissued and unregistered shares to be traded in the public market,`` and in some instances resulting in ``two or more shareholders who purchase shares in separate transactions to own the same shares.``

The complaint alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the ``stock borrow`` program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that ``open positions`` resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, ``approximated $3,025,467,000`` due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC`s ``Stock Borrow Program.``

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a ``scheme`` to ``manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions.`` The suit also claims that the s have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that ``concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity.``

Nanopierce claims that it had ``relied on material misrepresentations and omissions by DTC and NSCC in trading its shares in the stock market ``without knowledge of s` fraud-on-the market through statements they made about the clearing and settlement services they provided.`` Further, it claims that the s acted with ``scienter`` since they had a major financial financial motivation to falsely represent their services, which Nanopierce claims are also anticompetitive.

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC`s July 28 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.`s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned ``NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition.``

As the Nanopierce lawsuit reveals, those were indeed strong words, meddling as it did, in a substantial revenues base for the DTCC.

Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group, Bank of America`s (NYSE: BAC) Banc of America Securities LLC, Societe Generale`s (OTC: SCGLF) SG Cowen Securities Corp. vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN), Knight Trading Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NITE), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had ``sat on`` the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.

``The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD (``non-member broker/dealers``).

The new rule is on the web at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD`s request to put it into effect had set on a shelf at the SEC since 2001.

The scandal has embroiled hundreds of companies and dozens of brokers and marketmakers, in a web of internaitional intrigue, manipulative short-selling and cross-border acctions and denials.

Comments on Regulation SHO ended January 5, and may be viewed at www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303.shtml .

Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Knight (NASDAQ: NITE) and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy

The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.

The complete list of those 108 companies include Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTCBB: ADVR), AdZone Research, Inc. (OTCBB: ADZR), Amazon Natural Treasures (OTC: ANTD), America`s Senior Financial Services (OTCBB: AMSE), American Ammunition, Inc. (OTCBB: AAMI), AngelCiti Entertainment (OTCBB: AGLC), ATSI Communications, Inc. (OTC: ATSC), Federal Agricultural Mortgage / Farmer Mac (NYSE: AGM) Allied Capital (NYSE: ALD), American Motorcycle (OTC: AMCYV), American International Industries (OTCBB: AMIN), Ameri-Dream (OTC: AMDR), Adirondack Pure Springs Mt. Water Co. (OTCBB: APSW), ATSI Communications,Inc. (OTC: ATSC) Bluebook International (OTCBB: BBIC), Blue Industries (OTCBB: BLIIV), Bentley Communications (OTCBB: BTLY), BIFS Technologies Corporation (OTCBB: BIFT), Biocurex (OTCBB: BOCX). Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (OTCBB: BDLF), Chattem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTT), Critical Home Care (OTCBB: CCLH), Composite Holdings (OTC: COHIA), CyberDigital, Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD). Diamond International Group (OTCBB: DMND), Dobson Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: DCEL), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC), Edgetech Services (OTCBB: EDGH);

Also, Endovasc Ltd. (OTCBB: EVSC), Enviro-Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ENGY), Environmental Products & Technologies (OTC: EPTC), Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (OTCBB: ESWW), EPIXTAR Corp. (OTCBB: EPXR), eResearchTechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES), Flight Safety Technologies (OTCBB: FLST), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), FreeStar Technologies (OTCBB: FSRCE), Front Porch Digital,

Inc. (OTCBB: FPDI), Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (OTCBB: GETC), Genesis Intermedia (OTC: GENI), GeneMax Corp. (OTCBB: GMXX), Global Explorations Inc (OTC: GXXL), Global Path (OTCBB: GBPI), GloTech Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: GTHI), Green Dolphin Systems (OTCBB: GLDS), Group Management (OTCBB: GPMT), Hop-On (OTC: HPON), H-Quotient, Inc., (OTCBB: HQNT), Hyperdynamics Corp. (OTCBB: HYPD), International Biochem (OTCBB: IBCL), Intergold Corp. (OTCBB: IGCO), International Broadcasting Corporation (OTCBB: IBCS), InternetStudios, Inc. (OTCBB: ISTO), ITIS Holdings (OTCBB: ITHH), Investco Corp. (OTCBB: IVCO), Lair Holdings (OTC: LAIR), Lifeline BioTechnologies Inc. (OTC: LBTT), Life Energy & Technology (OTCBB: LETH), MBIA (NYSE: MBI);

Also, MegaMania Interactive (OTC: MNIA), MetaSource Group, Inc. (OTCBB: MTSR),Midastrade.com (OTC: MIDS), Make Your Move (OTCBB: MKMV), Medinah Minerals (OTC: MDMN), MSM Jewelry Corp. (OTC: MSMC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NPCT), Nutra Pharmaceutical (OTCBB: NPHC), Nutek (OTCBB: NUTK), Navigator Ventures (OTC: NVGV), Orbit E-Commerce, Inc. (OTCBB: OECI), Pitts & Spitts (OTC: PSPP), Sales OnLine Direct (OTCBB: PAID), Pacel Corp. (OTCBB: PACC), PayStar Corporation (OTC: PYST),Petrogen Corp. (OTCBB: PTGC), Pinnacle Business Management (OTC: PCBM), Premier Development & Investment, Inc. (OTCBB: PDVN), PrimeHoldings.com, Inc. (OTC: PRIM), Phlo Corporation (OTCBB: PHLC), Resourcing Solutions (OTC: RESG), Reed Holdings (OTC: RDHC), Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. (OTCBB: RMECE), RTIN Holdings (OTCBB: RTNHE), Saflink Corp. (NASDAQ: SFLK), Safe Travel Care (OTCBB: SFTVV), Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA);

Also, Sionix Corp. (OTCBB: SINX), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Starmax Technologies (OTC: SMXIF), Storage Suites America (OTC: SSUA), Suncomm Technologies (OTC: STEH), Sports Resorts International (NASDAQ: SPRI), Technology Logistics (OTC: TLOS), Swiss Medica, Inc. (OTCBB: SWME), Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB: TNTI), Tidelands Oil (OTCBB: TIDE), Titan Construction (OTC: TTCS), Trezac Corp. (OTCBB: TRZAV), Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP), Valesc Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: VLSHV), Vega Atlantic (OTCBB: VGAC), Viragen (AMEX: VRA), Viragen International (OTCBB: VGNI), Vista Continental Corporation, (OTCBB: VICC), Viva International (OTCBB: VIVI), Vtex Energy (OTCBB: VXENE) and Wizzard Software (OTCBB: WIZD), WorldTradeShow.com (OTC: WTSW) and Y3K Secure Enterprise Software, Inc. (OTCBB: YTHK).

Earlier in 2003, the SEC fined Rhino Advisors, Inc., $1 million for its representation of Amro International in the financing and manipulation of Sedona Corp. Amro, also known as AMRO, was registered in Panama, a secretive offshore haven, but was not named in the SEC settlement. Another 60 public companies may have been manipulated by the fined Rhino Advisors and its indicted principals, or its funding apparatus, Amro.

These include:

All American Food Group Inc (OTC: AAFGQ), Amanda Co Inc (OTC: AMNA), Antra Holdings (OTC: RECD), Aquis Communications Group Inc (OTCBB: AQUIS), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (AMEX: AVN), Bionutrics Inc (OTC: BNRX), Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc (AMEX: BDE), Bravo! Foods International Corp. (OTCBB: BRVOE), Butler National Corp (NASDAQ: BUTL),Calypte Biomedical Corp (OTCBB: CYPT), Chemtrak Inc/DE (OTC: CMTR), Clicknsettle Com Inc (OTCBB: CLIK), Corporate Vision Inc (OTC: CVIA), Crown Laboratories Inc/DE (OTC: CLWB), Dental Medical Diagnostic Systems Inc (OTC: DMDS), Detour Media Group Inc (OTC: DTRM),

Also, Digital Privacy Inc/DE (OTC: DGPV), Senior Services Inc (OTC: DISS), International Inc (OTC: DYNX), Endovasc Ltd Inc (OTCBB: EVSC), Esynch Corp/CA (OTCBB: ESYN), Focus Enhancements Inc (NASDAQ: FSCE), Frederick Brewing Co (OTC: FRBW), Greystone Digital Technology Inc (OTC: GSTN), Havana Republic Inc/FL (OTCBB: HVNR), Henley Healthcare Inc (OTC: HENL), Hollywood Media Corp (NASDAQ: HOLL), Ibiz Technology Corp (OTCBB: IBZT), Diagnostic Systems Inc/FL (OTCBB: IMDS), Imaging Technologies (OTCBB: IMTO), Integrated Surgical Systems Inc (OTCBB: RDOC),

Also, Interferon Sciences Inc (OTC: IFSC), Interiors Inc (OTC: ITRNA), Laminaire Corp (OTC: THMZ), Medisys Technologies Inc (OTC: SCEP), Milestone Scientific Inc/NJ (AMEX: MS), Nevada Manhattan Group Inc (OTC: NVMH), Innovations Inc (OTCBB: NTGE),Systems Group (OTC: OSYM), Pacific Systems Control Technology Inc (OTCBB: PFSY), Professional Transportation Group Ltd Inc (OTC: TRUC), Rnethealth Inc (OTC: RNTT),

Also, Sand Technology Inc (NASDAQ: SNDT), Sedona Corp (OTCBB: SDNA), Silverado Foods Inc (OTC: SVFO), Stockgroup Information Systems (OTCBB: SWEB) Surgilight Inc (OTC: SRGL), Tasty Fries Inc (OTCBB: TFRY), Tech Laboratories Inc (OTCBB: TCHL), Teltran International Group Ltd (OTC: TLTG), Titan Motorcycle Co of America Inc (OTC: TMOTQ), Trans Energy Inc (OTCBB: TSRG), Motorcycle Co (OTC: UMCC), Universal Communication Systems Inc (OTCBB: UCSY), Medical Systems Inc (OTC: UMSI), Vianet Technologies Inc (OTC: VNTK),Viragen Inc (AMEX: VRA), Webcatalyst Inc (OTC: WBCL), Worldwide Wireless Networks Inc (OTCBB: WWWNQ), and ZAP (OTCBB: ZAPZ).

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on www.financialwire.net

[libertyjean]

Subject: New patent app filed by Avery Dennison mentions NanoPierce and WaferPierce:
From Kknightmcc
PostID 344879 On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 (EST) at 3:32:46 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

United States Patent Application 20040125040
Kind Code A1
Ferguson, Scott Wayne ; et al. July 1, 2004


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RFID device and method of forming


Abstract
A radio frequency identification (RIFD) inlay includes a conductive connection electrically connecting an antenna to strap leads that are coupled to an RFID chip. The conductive connection may include conductive bumps attached to the strap, and/or may include conductive traces, such as a conductive ink traces. The conductive connections provide a convenient, fast, and effective way to operatively couple antennas and straps. The RFID inlay may be part of an RFID label or RFID tag.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inventors: Ferguson, Scott Wayne; (Arcadia, CA) ; Edwards, David N.; (Arcadia, CA)
Correspondence Name and Address: Jonathan A. Platt
Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP
Nineteenth Floor
1621 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland
OH
44115-2191
US


Serial No.: 334290
Series Code: 10
Filed: December 31, 2002

U.S. Current Class: 343/895; 343/700MS
U.S. Class at Publication: 343/895; 343/700.0MS
Intern`l Class: H01Q 001/36



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Claims

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reference to WaferPierce and NanoPierce:

[0058] Formation of conductive-bumps 124 such as those described above may be accomplished, for example, by use of WAFERPIERCE technology marketed by NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., of Denver, Colo. Such technology is described in greater detail in PCT Publication WO 02/25825, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=… -bool.html&r=4&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=Avery&s2=Dennison&OS=Avery+AND+Dennison&RS=Avery+AND+Dennison

This link is to a Tag & Label Manufacturers Institute article that mentions Dave Edwards an executive of Avery Dennison as follows:

A presentation on ``New Business Development`` by Dave Edwards of Avery Dennison. As one of the people behind Avery`s program, ``100 Days to a New Product,`` he`ll explain how that program works, and how you can put those same techniques to work in growing your own business.

http://www.tlmi.com/calendar/converter/2004converterletter.h…

Scott Ferguson is a high level Avery Dennison engineer.

[ToSky]

Hi,
von Donnerstag:
Today a Long White Candlestick formed. Buyers were aggressive and the buying pressure was strong. Be careful, this may be a potential turning point!

von Freitag:
Today a White Marubozu formed. Buyers have controlled the price action from the first trade to the last trade. Be careful, this may be a potential turning point!

Mal schauen wie es weiter geht .

Gruß und schönen Sonntag noch

[kaliho]

Small firms fret over Berlin trading

By Glenn Singer
Business Writer
Posted August 1 2004

Email story
Print story

Q: What is naked short selling?
A: Short selling involves the sale of borrowed stock. In naked short selling, the investor never borrows the stock in the first place. In some schemes, multiple investors sell identical shares of stock at the same time.

Q: How can you sell something you don`t own?

A: In modern finance, many stock sales don`t involve the physical transfer of certificates that signify ownership. Thus, the "sale" is simply recorded on, say, a brokerage house`s ledger sheet.

Q: Why is naked short selling bad?

A: The practice can result in more shares being traded than were actually issued, diluting the value of the stock. Falling prices hurt a company`s investors, and a low stock price can threaten a company`s very existence because it reduces its ability to raise capital for growth and expansion.

Q: What companies are most susceptible?

A: Stocks targeted are generally shares of small and micro-cap companies that trade over the counter in low volumes and at a low price, although stocks traded on the major exchanges have been targeted as well.

Q: What tactics do naked short-sellers use?

A: Naked short-sellers might post false information about the company in Internet chat rooms, spread false rumors and do everything within their power to push down the stock price.

- Glenn Singer




Shares of several small public companies in South Florida and hundreds more throughout the rest of the nation have been listed on a relatively obscure exchange in Germany -- often without authorization or even notification. And the companies` executives are worried.

Firms such as Imaging Diagnostic Systems, Applied Digital Solutions, Hollywood Media, Intelligent Motor Cars Group Inc. and The Havana Republic are among those whose stock is available on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange, which is less prestigious than the prominent Frankfurt bourse.

Yet the Berlin-Bremen exchange, which was founded in 1685, has become the focal point of securities attorneys, investment advisers, online financial columnists and even the Securities and Exchange Commission. They`re all concerned that such overseas listings, which cannot be monitored as closely as those in this country or in major foreign financial markets, place companies at risk of market manipulation that could deflate their market capitalization, hurt their potential to raise cash and cause big losses for shareholders.

"A lot of the companies are just starting to discover they`re being traded in Berlin, and their management teams range from being upset to being livid," said attorney Joseph Emas of Miami. Emas said he represents about two dozen small, emerging businesses, half of which have been put on the Berlin-Bremen trading list.

The biggest concern about being listed in Berlin, Wall Street observers say, is that the companies could be exposed to a form of manipulation known as naked short-selling.

Conventional short-sellers make money by selling shares borrowed from a broker, with the hope the price will fall. If the price does drop, they buy back the shares on the open market at the lower price, return them to the broker and keep the difference. It can be a risky strategy: If a stock starts to rise, potential losses are unlimited.

While public companies generally dislike short sellers for undermining confidence in their stock, short-selling has its proponents. They argue that "shorts," as they`re called, often uncover deep-seated problems with a company, or even just weakness in its business approach -- information that helps set a more accurate price on the stock.

The problem is that in a naked short sale, the trader sells shares without borrowing them -- a strategy carried out by dishonest investors and investment houses throughout the world, according to investment advisers and legal experts. Naked short sellers depress the price of a stock by artificially boosting its supply. The practice is illegal in the United States.

Attorney Frederick D. Lipman, a securities law expert at the Philadelphia branch of Blank Rome LLP, said in recent comments to the SEC that "unscrupulous naked short-sellers will post false information about the company in Internet chat rooms, spread false rumors and do everything within their power to do harm to the company. Indeed, the ultimate triumph of a naked short-seller is to drive the company out of business."

The man who runs the Berlin-Bremen exchange, Joerg Walter, told Reuters news service last week that in his 10 years with the exchange, he has not seen a single case of naked short-selling. He said such a practice is not possible in Germany and is barred by strict rules.

Overseas listings

In the United States, conventional short selling has been regulated since the 1930s under a rule that lets investors sell most stocks short only when share prices were rising. It was adopted during the Depression at a time when short sellers were blamed by some for the 1929 stock market crash.

The Berlin listings came just weeks before a new National Association of Securities Dealers rule took effect that would further tighten restrictions against naked short selling in the United States. Under the rule, those seeking to sell shares short must be able to demonstrate that they are able to gain access to the securities within two days.

Just weeks before the rule was implemented, Holger Timm, CEO of Berliner Freiverkehr, a brokerage with offices in Berlin and Frankfurt, applied to list about 800 U.S. companies he picked from the Nasdaq Over the Counter Bulletin Board on the Berlin-Bremen exchange, according to The Financial Times of London. His explanation: German investors were looking for promising new technology companies.

The OTC Bulletin Board lists quotes for the stocks of 3,300 companies that do not meet strict standards for the Nasdaq National Market. Many are tiny, sometimes with only ideas and no products. They are not under the same regulatory microscope as larger public companies are and tend to have more volatile stock prices that could be easier to manipulate.

Some of the firms listed said they were contacted by Berliner Freiverkehr; many say they were not, according to their news releases and interviews.

Not all complain

Although no one knows if improprieties are occurring in Berlin, one online investment adviser has dubbed the scenario "Stockgate."

An SEC spokesman declined to say whether the agency is looking into naked short selling improprieties in Germany, but representatives from the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers met with German regulators and Berlin-Bremen exchange officials in June to assess the trading of over-the-counter stocks on that exchange.

It is legal in Germany to list an American company on an exchange without its consent. At Berlin-Bremen, a broker can call the exchange and ask to trade a company`s shares. If that firm is traded on another exchange, such as the Nasdaq, and is in compliance with its rules, Berlin-Bremen will list it. This applies to American Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange companies, as well.

Over-the-counter Bulletin Board stocks have been traded on the exchange for several years "without any complaint of the issuers," the Berlin-Bremen exchange said in a June 16 statement, after meeting with U.S. representatives.

The de-listing battle

Some U.S. companies protest that they don`t want to be listed, but find if difficult to be removed.

"You have to send the exchange e-mail after e-mail after e-mail, demanding to be de-listed," attorney Emas said. "Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn`t. When I did this for one client, he got back a marketing letter telling him the advantages of being listed. We`re still fighting that one."

Emas maintains that having a listing on an obscure exchange where there is little oversight, particularly from afar, can damage a company`s reputation. Also, its shares can be vulnerable to such tactics as naked short selling.

South Florida companies have no proof that there is naked short selling occurring with their shares, but some are taking action; others are taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Boca Raton-based Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, a drug maker that trades on Nasdaq, has launched an in-house investigation into its listing.

Viragen, a drug maker that has been listed on the German exchange for four years and has seen its share price tumble from a split-adjusted $47 in early 2000 to just over $1 on Wednesday, said through its lawyers that it is monitoring the situation and would "involve regulatory organizations when it has perceived that its interests and those of its stockholders were being adversely impacted."

Hollywood Entertainment said last week that it had asked to be removed from the German exchange. A company spokeswoman said the legal department considered the situation a "non-event" because there has been no trading in the stock.

`Perfectly legal`

But securities attorneys and officials from some companies said it is very hard to track short sales, and that they often are not reflected in the reported daily volume.

"It`s almost impossible to monitor," said Sean Hayes of Cincinnati-based Pickups Plus Inc., an automotive parts retailer that has had two bouts with the Berlin exchange. The company has denounced its listing and its chief executive, Merritt Jesson, said he was "both incensed and appalled to learn that our stock could be listed on a foreign exchange without our knowledge or consent."

Pickups Plus` lawyer, Clayton Parker of Miami, protested strongly enough to have the listing removed -- for a while.

"We got removed and then a different broker put us back on," Hayes said. "The exchange told us it is perfectly legal and we cannot do anything about it."

Glenn Singer can be reached at [e-mail] or 561-243-6612.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/local/sfl-sbnaked01aug0…

[stevemann]

was genau macht nanopierce überhaupt?
danke mfg

[kaliho]

wenn man ueber nanopierce was wissen will, sollte man diese links durchgehen... einige auch in deutsch:

company web site at:
http://www.nanopierce.com

See the patents and technology at:
http://www.nanopierce.com/technology.htm

Exatron uses NanoPierce`s Particle Interconnect Technology, see:
http://www.exatron.com/products/contacts/hs~index.html

49% owned subsidiary ExypnoTech:
http://www.exypnotech.com/draft/data/home_e.html

51% owner of ExypnoTech and joint venture partner TagStar Systems:
http://www.tagstar-systems.de/frames_english.html

50% owned joint venture with Scimaxx Solutions see:
http://www.scimaxx.com/scimaxx_solutions.htm

[stevemann]

@kaliho

dank dir
mfg

[Kaleidoscape]

Habe von Obducat die Schnauze voll und hab jetzt umgeschichtet. Bin bei Nanopierce voll eingestiegen. Zur Zeit voll das geile " Chance-Risiko-Verhältnis" (siehe Chart).
Nanopierce wird sich bis Februar 2005 verfünffachen. Zur Zeit bei ca 0,11 Euro.
Die Party kann jetzt los gehen. Viel Spaß für alle die dabei sind.

[ToSky]

Drüben 0,135 ,die 0,14 haben wir auch schon gesehen und hier verkaufen sie für 0,106 .

[heikekarina]

Kaleidoscape

nur am Rande erwähnt

Anlegr die Ende 03 zu 0,08 investierten. durften sich im Hoch über 600% Performence erfreuen.

Und das gleiche Spiel wird sich in wenigen Monaten wiederholen.

Es bedarf nur sehr starker Nerven.

[DMKE]

jetzt dürfte so langsam das ende erreicht sein...

[Kaleidoscape]

Allzeittief! Der Boden ist erreicht. Jetzt geht es langsam wieder aufwärts.

[Kaleidoscape]

Obducat hat heute 20% hinter sich. Vielleicht hat Nanopierce heute noch 20% vor sich. (Allzeittief und hohe Umsätze gestern). Spätestens September / Oktober wird bei Nanopierce die Rakete gezündet.

[DMKE]

gibt es einen grund für den jetzigen verfall bei nanopierce ?

[Rob2303]

nö

versteht man zwar nicht, iss aber so

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

nur zur Info:

Der Chart sieht sehr interessant aus!

Ich habe heute versucht, 20000 Stück in USA zu 0,095 $
zu bekommen. Leider vergeblich!

Dies bedeutet: irgend jemand manipuliert nach unten und
sammelt dann ein!

Kaufsignal!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[jojobada]

Hallo gute Fee,

wie schön das Du auch hier bis, auch ich habe mich mit 1000 Stück eingedeckt 0,095

ich wünsch Dir was.
MfG jojobada

[Katzennarr]

Yeep, die Einstiegskurse sind erreicht.

[analle]

hallo Katzé,

kenn Dich aus alten Zeiten, dass kann nur ein Zock sein, schreib das Unternehmen ab,

meine Meinung

[MRASTA]

was denn, da wundert sich jemand, das die Pierces da stehen wo Sie stehen ????????

Sorry, aber da mut Du wohl besser lesen.

Charttechnik, bei Nanopierce ? Mann, ne Frau aber das ist hier nun völlig daneben.

Wenn überhaupt ist das Gambling pur. 0.10 sind gefallen, wie schon mehrfach angedacht wurde.


Nun darf jeder selber zocken, denn nichts anderes ist es. Hier gibt es überhaupt keinen Plan, geht gut oder in die Hose.

viel Spass
mrasta

[Katzennarr]

@ analle
das iss gut, an alle und analle.

Du hast Recht, wenn überhaupt würde ich nur zu einem Zock einsteigen.
Alles andere hat mich gelehrt, wäre Dumm.

Gruß Rainer
http://www.alkohol-nee.de

[Frhstck]

Der Boden ist bei 0,07 $ vorher steige ich garantiert nicht ein. Mit diesem Kurswert ist das Umsatzwachstum halbwegs gerechtfertigt.

[kaliho]

und woher weisst du der boden ist bei 0,07??

wehen einem cent den einstieg verpassen??

[Boersenkrieger]

tja nanopierce, ging also daneben...
was haltet ihr von ArQule, pSivida und Headwaters ? Da scheint einiges mehr substanz dahinter zu sein. die wirklichen nano-firmen haben es sowieso nicht nötig sich nano-irgendwas zu nennen....

[meeting]

was hältst du von
189904

Die sind wenigstens Profitabel

[kaliho]

hier wird immer noch nach unten manipuliert.
wie lange das noch gut geht?

die shorts sind hier immer noch am werken. aufpassen!!

[xbay]

#3165 - ernsthafte Frage: wie hast Du den Wert errechnet ?

[Katzennarr]

@xbay

0,075 war schon mal Boden.

[stevemann]

geduld zahlt sich meistens aus
no risk no money
mfg

[Kaleidoscape]

Die letzten beißen die Hunde ! Unter 0,10$ geht es nicht mehr !

[kaliho]

NEWS:


NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. Files Complaint Against The DepositoryTrust and Clearing Corporation, The Depository Trust Company and The NationalSecurities Clearing Corporation

DENVER, Aug 18, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: NPCT), announced today that it has filed a complaint against The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), The Depository Trust Company (DTC) and The National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) in the Second Judicial District Court, County of Washoe, State of Nevada. The company is the creator of NanoPierce Technologies` NCS(TM) -- an advanced system designed to provide significant improvement over conventional electrical and mechanical interconnection methods for high-density circuit boards, components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor packaging and electronic systems. NanoPierce is represented by the law firms of O`Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle, Christian Smith & Jewell, and Heard, Robins, Cloud, Lubel & Greenwood, LLP, all of Houston, Texas and Michael J. Morrison, Esq. and Lionel Sawyer & Collins, both of Reno, Nevada.

Attorney Sean Greenwood said: "We believe that the dramatic devaluation of NanoPierce stock would not have occurred were it not for the actions of the defendants as described in the complaint." The complaint alleges that the DTCC, DTC and NSCC acted in concert to operate the Stock Borrow Program, originally created to address short term delivery failures by sellers of securities in the stock market. According to the complaint, the Defendants conspired to maintain significant open fail deliver positions of millions of shares of NanoPierce stock for extended periods of time by using the Stock Borrow Program to cover these open and unsettled positions. By permitting shares of NanoPierce to be borrowed through the Program, the complaint continues, the Defendants allegedly jointly conspired to drive down the price of the stock. The complaint also alleges that the operation of the Program allowed the manipulation of NanoPierce stock by various sellers who failed to deliver NanoPierce shares. By covering open fail to deliver positions with shares borrowed through the Stock Borrow Program and delivering borrowed shares to the buyers, the complaint contends that the Defendants artificially created unregistered, free trading NanoPierce shares and increased the supply of NanoPierce shares in the marketplace.

The complaint further alleges that there is little incentive for the Defendants to cure fail to deliver positions because the Stock Borrow Program has become a reliable source of income for the Defendants.

Paul Metzinger, President, CEO and Director of NanoPierce said: "We, our shareholders and the trading public at large relied on the DTC and the NSCC to properly account for the purchase and sale of NanoPierce shares. Their mishandling of these shares and the misrepresentation that resulted are inexcusable." Lead attorney John O`Quinn commented: "Our team will not stop until justice has been served and restitution secured for NanoPierce and its shareholders."

SOURCE NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.


CONTACT: Ivan Kronenfeld, [phone], or [e-mail], for
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
(NPCT)

www.prnewswire.com


Copyright (C) 2004 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.


http://host.wallstreetcity.com/wsc2/Autoflag.html?Button=Get…

[Kaleidoscape]

0,115 (+9,5%) in US. Schnallt euch an. Es geht los !!!

[DMKE]

ja, jetzt täglich ein cent mehr

[avsa]

hofentlich hast du recht aber ich vermute es wird bis oktober dauern dann gehts hoch nicht verkaufen und nicht kaufen ab warten bis stabile ist meine meinung alles gute an alle kolegen

[Rob2303]

um welche summe geht es, die sich die leerverkäufer unter
den nagel gerissen haben.

[DMKE]

was ist denn da heute los ??
+ 30 %

[kaliho]

@Frhstk

denkst Du immer noch wir gehen runter auf 0,07??? wie schon gesagt, nur luegner kaufen am boden und verkaufen zum hoch.

[Rob2303]

@Frhstk

was soll den bitte dieses posting vermitteln.

Der Boden ist bei 0,07 $ vorher steige ich garantiert nicht ein. Mit diesem Kurswert ist das Umsatzwachstum halbwegs gerechtfertigt.


kopfschüttel



vielleicht solltest du dich "glaskugel_zum_fruehstueck" nennen, aber vergiss nicht, das du bei der anmeldung der id die umlaute ausschreibst.

ansonsten viele grüsse an die kollegen vom callcenter.

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.130
Close: 0.130
High: 0.130
Low: 0.110
Open: 0.120
Change: +0.02
Volume: 1,134,100


Bid: 0.125
Ask: 0.140
Bid/Ask Size: 244,700 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: 18.1%

[diegutefee]

Ich kann nur sagen:
"Wer zu spät kommt, den bestraft die Börse!"

Wenn die Bullen den Shorties keine Chance geben, dann
werden sie von alleine verschwinden!

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht!

diegutefee

[kaliho]

nach schluss: 16:02:26 0.128 321000 OTCBB


Latest Quote


Last: 0.128
Close: 0.130
High: 0.130
Low: 0.110
Open: 0.120
Change: +0.01
Volume: 1,430,100


Bid: 0.125
Ask: 0.130
Bid/Ask Size: 244,700 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: 18.1%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/19/04 - 10:07 p.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


16:02:26 0.128 321000 OTCBB
16:00:13 0.130 25000 OTCBB
16:00:08 0.130 15000 OTCBB
15:59:36 0.130 15000 OTCBB
15:59:25 0.130 15000 OTCBB
15:59:20 0.130 10000 OTCBB
15:59:17 0.130 15000 OTCBB
15:58:26 0.130 20000 OTCBB
15:54:31 0.130 15000 OTCBB
15:53:47 0.130 1600 OTCBB

[Frhstck]

@ROB2303

ABWARTEN

[ToSky]

wer kauft eigentlich immer auf Xetra ?

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

Stand 15.30 Uhr: 0,13 $

Schlußkurs: 0,14 $

Wer den Shorties Chancen einräumt, ist selber schuld!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

schaut auf den Chart in USA, dann werdet Ihr erkennen,
daß wir einen Doppelboden haben (W-Formation) wie gestern.
Wer jetzt noch verkauft, ist selber schuld!

Schlußkurs: zwischen 0,13 - 0,14 $

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

P.S.:
Die Shorties (Börsen-Terroristen) sollen an der Börse
keine Chancen mehr haben!
Wer auf Put setzt fördert indirekt den Terrorismus!
Begründung: Siehe 11. September!

[kaliho]

der preis stabilisiert sich ganz langsam. aber das ist genau was ich sehen will und ist auf die laengere sicht sehr positiv. auch wenn wir unter umstaenden nochmal niedrige preise sehen.

bei schwaeche kaufen!!

[AnkerLpzg]

Hallo Fee,

der kurs bröckelt wieder dorthin zurück, wo er vor 3 tagen stand VOR dem ein-tages-hype, wetten dass ...

gruss

[kaliho]

@Anker
wetten dass Du kaum was unter 0.12 cents kaufen kannst.
jedenfalls nicht momentan.

was willst Du wetten?

[kaliho]

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


14:59:49 0.121 500 OTCBB at Bid
13:43:05 0.128 35000 OTCBB
12:20:44 0.121 8000 OTCBB at Bid
12:09:08 0.125 100 OTCBB at Ask
12:00:56 0.125 8000 OTCBB at Ask
11:01:08 0.125 200 OTCBB
10:38:43 0.125 10000 OTCBB
10:38:00 0.125 5000 OTCBB
10:33:31 0.125 1000 OTCBB at Ask
10:32:35 0.125 5000 OTCBB at Bid


Click here for

[Frhstck]

ICH DENKE WIR SEHEN DIE 8 CENT AUF JEDEN FALL NOCHMAL OB WIR SIE NOCHMAL UNTERSCHREITEN WAGE ICH MITLERWEILE ZU BEZWEIFELN. DIESE 40 % LETZTE WOCHE WAR NUR EINE KURZE ERHOLUNG VOR DEM RICHTIGEN ANSTIEG. NUN BLEIBT NUR NOCH DIE FRAGE WANN DIE NÄCHSTE NANOHYPE STEIGT: WAS MEINT IHR ?

GRUSS

[Kaleidoscape]

Das ist die Ruhe vor dem Sturm. Im September kommt die Explosion !!!

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

wie bereits in der vergangenen Woche erwähnt, sind
folgende Aktien seit meiner Empfehlung gestiegen:

- Aastrom, WKN 905286
- Stemcells, WKN 889118
- 8 x 8, WKN 907912

und Nanopierce selbstverständlich auch.

Viele Anleger haben leider noch nicht erkannt, welche
Chancen Nanopierce bietet und daß diese Aktie sehr
stark unterbewertet ist. Alleine die beiden deutschen
Töchter sind schon mehr wert als die Aktie.

Nanopierce könnte irgendwann die Töchter an die Börse
bringen und die Nanopierce-Altaktionäre für ihre Treue
belohnen. (Dies ist nur eine Idee von mir!)

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Wenn Nanopierce explodiert, dann aber gewaltig!
Nur Geduld muß man allerdings haben.

[AnkerLpzg]

Liebe "Gute Fee",

das sind leider für US-Verhältnisse so gut wie keine Umsätze ...

Gutes oder schlechtes Zeichen

Gruss aus Leipzig !

[libertyjean]

@diegutefee
dass Nanopierce ihre Töchter an die Bôrse bringen kann ist ja von mir und zwar seit Monaten, daher krieg ich die Goldmedaille !

[diegutefee]

Hallo AnkerLpzg,
hallo Libertyjean,

geringe Umsätze bedeutet für mich: einsammeln!
große Umsätze dagegen: verkaufen und Gewinne mitnehmen!

Zum Beispiel: Zur Zeit werden die Nanophase-Aktien
(WKN 910885) eingesammelt.
Begründung: geringe Stückzahlen bedeutet, daß keiner
mehr bereit ist, seine Aktien zu diesen Kursen herzu-
geben!

Außerdem sehe ich bei Vitesse und Atmel auch noch
weiteres Potential. Dies ist aber keine Kaufempfehlung,
weil diese beiden Aktien in den letzten Tagen bereits
zugelegt haben.

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht
an alle meine Freunde!

diegutefee

P.S.:
Die Goldmedaille bekommt selbstverständlich Libertyjean!
Seine Idee ist hervorragend!

[kaliho]

@gute Fee

naja, aber wir hatten doch ganz gutes volumen hier in Frankfurt.

keiner wird aus dieser manipulation schlau.

[zentralflughafen]

Vielleicht sollten die auch noch ihre Kantine an die Börse bringen (sofern vorhanden für die paar Leute).
Immerhin besteht der begründete Verdacht, dass der Kantinenumsatz den der Firma um einiges übersteigt und sie vielleicht sogar annähernd schwarze Zahlen schreibt...

Unterbewertung, Börsengänge - mir scheint der Sommer war für manchen etwas zu heiss..

Vielleicht is NPCT ja noch zum zocken gut, aber für buy & hold sicherlich nicht. Die haben das Ihnen entgegengebrachte Vertrauen doch schon seit ein paar Jahren verspielt.

Naja, jedem seinen Luftballon...

[kaliho]

@zentral

und Dir ein besonders schoenen Heissluft Ballon.

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

der Aktien-Kurs von Nanopierce erinnert mich irgendwie
an "Calypte"!

Begründung:
Zuerst stürzte die Aktie bis 0,10 $ ab; danach wurde in
aller Ruhe eingesammelt. Calypte wurde in dieser Zeit
ständig nieder geprügelt! Als man dann genügend einge-
sammelt hatte, kam die Hammermeldung, daß die Marr-
Gruppe zum Kurs von 0,30 $ eingestiegen ist!
Kurz danach kam wieder eine Hammermeldung, daß die
Marr-Gruppe zum Kurs von 0,40 $ sich weiterhin ein-
decken will.

Die Calypte-Aktie stieg in dieser Zeit von 0,10 $ bis
ca. 1,80 $.

Calypte (neue Bezeichnung: HIV) wird in 2005 in die
Gewinnzone kommen (KGV ca. 5).

Dies nur zur Info!

Ich bin mir sicher, daß bei Nanopierce zur Zeit einge-
sammelt wird! Den Grund werden wir erst später erfahren!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[AnkerLpzg]

Einfach nur Dreck ...

[diegutefee]

An der Börse können nur diejenigen überleben, die den
Ritt durch die Hölle überstanden haben!

Nur nervenstarke Investoren mit dem Blick in die Zukunft
sind die Gewinner!

Die Angsthasen mit den zittrigen Händen haben hier nichts
zu suchen!

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht

diegutefee

[kaliho]

genau.... bald gibts schmerzensgeld.

erst der schmerz, dann das geld

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

lest bitte die neueste Meldung unter "wallstreetcity.com",
dann werdet Ihr sehen, daß Nanopierce sehr große Chancen
hat, den Prozeß zu gewinnen!

Ab 1/2005 wird es für die Shorties schlecht aussehen!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Ich muß jetzt leider dringend weg und werde mich später
wieder melden!

[AnkerLpzg]

die umsätze sind ein witz ...

[Kaleidoscape]

Hallo Fee !
Warum 01/2005.
Es geht doch schon los. Es dauert nicht lange dann sind wir bei 0,20 Dollar !!!
Ok im Januar wird Nanopierce dann Richtung Mond abheben.
Ganz meiner Meinung!

[diegutefee]

Hallo Kaleidoscape,

die Nanopierce-Rakete ist bereits gestartet!
Nur haben es manche noch nicht bemerkt!

Die 1000 % werden wir noch sehen!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Warum teure Aktien kaufen, wenn es noch Schnäppchen gibt?

Ich melde mich später wieder!

[DMKE]

bin auch schon fett investiert. abwarten und dann gemütlich weihnachtsgeld kassieren

[Frhstck]

Habt Jemand den Realtime´kurs von NIP in Amerika?

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.125
High: 0.130
Low: 0.125
Open: 0.130
Change: -0.01
Volume: 83,600


Bid: 0.125
Ask: 0.130
Bid/Ask Size: 206,500 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: -3.9%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/26/04 - 11:07 a.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


10:24:30 0.125 100 OTCBB at Bid
09:57:50 0.125 1000 OTCBB at Bid
09:49:55 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:49:49 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:18 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:14 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:07 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Bid
09:40:40 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Bid
09:39:17 0.130 2500 OTCBB at Bid
09:33:50 0.130 10000 OTCBB at Ask

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.125
High: 0.130
Low: 0.125
Open: 0.130
Change: -0.01
Volume: 83,600


Bid: 0.125
Ask: 0.130
Bid/Ask Size: 206,500 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: -3.9%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/26/04 - 11:07 a.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


10:24:30 0.125 100 OTCBB at Bid
09:57:50 0.125 1000 OTCBB at Bid
09:49:55 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:49:49 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:18 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:14 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:07 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Bid
09:40:40 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Bid
09:39:17 0.130 2500 OTCBB at Bid
09:33:50 0.130 10000 OTCBB at Ask

[kaliho]

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


11:35:55 0.128 100000 OTCBB
11:30:08 0.130 5000 OTCBB
11:28:17 0.130 10000 OTCBB at Ask
11:27:03 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
11:07:52 0.130 20000 OTCBB at Ask
10:24:30 0.125 100 OTCBB at Bid
09:57:50 0.125 1000 OTCBB at Bid
09:49:55 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:49:49 0.130 15000 OTCBB at Ask
09:41:18 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask

[kaliho]

Level II quotes

http://www.quotemedia.com/results.php

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

ich habe soeben die Bilanzen von Nanopierce angeschaut
und die sehen wirklich gut aus!

net loss per share 2004: 0,01 $
net loss per share 2003: 0,05 $

Barvermögen wurde von mir noch nicht einmal berücksichtigt!

Die short seller drücken den Kurs, um günstig an Nanopierce-Aktien zu kommen!

Eines Tages wird eine Nanopierce-Aktie 5 $ kosten und
dann kann man sich nur noch darüber ärgern, weshalb man
nicht zu 0,10 $ gekauft hat.

Ich bin jedenfalls dabei und verschenke meine Aktien nicht!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[DMKE]

5 $ bitte bis weihnachten

[kaliho]

@diegute fee

die neue Bilanz koennen wir ende Sept. erwarten wenn wir das 10K sehen.

die ausgaben sind jetzt viel niedriger und $1 million in der bank. Toechterfirmen werden wohl gute nachrichten bringen, aber noch nicht in der kommenden Bilanz.

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.134
High: 0.134
Low: 0.125
Open: 0.130
Change: +0.00
Volume: 235,700


Bid: 0.130
Ask: 0.134
Bid/Ask Size: 206,500 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: 3.0%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/26/04 - 4:06 p.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


15:59:11 0.134 2000 OTCBB
15:15:48 0.130 3000 OTCBB at Bid
14:51:48 0.126 1000 OTCBB at Bid
14:15:12 0.126 1000 OTCBB at Bid
13:21:12 0.128 5100 OTCBB at Bid
11:35:55 0.128 100000 OTCBB
11:30:08 0.130 5000 OTCBB
11:28:17 0.130 10000 OTCBB at Ask
11:27:03 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
11:07:52 0.130 20000 OTCBB at Ask

[diegutefee]

Hallo kaliho,

vielen Dank für die Infos!

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht

diegutefee

[skilos]

Bald seehn wir hier die 0,20 € !!!

[kaliho]

hat lange genug gedauert, aber endlich bilden wir hier einen stabilen boden.

also doch keine 0,07 aktien!!
wie schon gesagt, nur luegner treffen das hoch und tief.

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

ich habe mir soeben den Chart angeschaut und es sieht für
unsere Nanopierce gut aus!

Wenn wir die 0,20 $ nach oben durchbrechen, dann könnten
wir durchaus den Dollar sehen!

Sofern die Nanopierce-Aktien alle in festen Händen sind und
keiner mehr bereit ist, seine Stücke herzugeben, dann
werden wir sehr schnell unser Ziel erreichen!

Herzliche Grüße und schönes Wochenende!

diegutefee

[AnkerLpzg]

... und wenn der Hahn kräht auf dem Mist, ändert sich das Wetter oder es bleibt wie es ist !!!

[kaliho]

Was bleibst wie`s ist, ist ganz bestimmt der Mist.

[kaliho]

Triple Bottom
Triple Bottom formation is the mirror image of the Triple Top. After an extended decline to new lows a stock puts-in a bottom on massive volume and a moderate rally ensues. After several sessions (sometimes weeks) the stock drifts back to test the first bottom and once again buyers push the stock higher. This process is repeated a third time before buyers finally overwhelm sellers and the stock moves significantly higher.

The technical target for a triple bottom formation is derived by adding the difference between bottom #1and the reaction high to the new breakout level. After the third bottom has been created, the new breakout level is the peak achieved between bottoms #2 and #3. No double bottom formation is complete until the stock rallies through this level.
For triple bottoms volume must increase as the stock moves toward the bottom of the pattern. Increased volume at the bottom of the pattern suggests that accumulation is taking place.
No triple bottom pattern is truly valid until the stock moves above the peak established between bottoms #2 and #3.
Upside breakouts through the reaction high often lead to small 2-3% advances followed by an immediate test of the breakout level. If the stock closes below this level (now support) for any reason the pattern becomes invalid.
Technical targets are implied but they are by no means assured. Targets are guideposts only.



Whereas triple tops are all about distribution, the Triple Bottom is about accumulation. After an extended decline characterized by aggressive short-selling and valuation concerns, value-oriented investors with longer-term time horizons begin to take positions in the stock. They understand that the only way to build a large position in a stock that they like is to do so when selling predominates. It is their willingness to buy the stock when all of the news is bad that creates a clear support level, the first bottom (bottom #1). This presence of large buyers in the face of bad fundamental news will normally be sufficient to force many professional short sellers (bears) to cover positions. This coupled with buying from longer-term value investors may be enough to rejuvenate investors that recently purchased the stock at higher levels -- they may even rationalize that the "market" is finally beginning to realize that the current weakness is without merit and a few bullish speculators may be enticed to take new long positions.

Unfortunately, after several sessions of positive price action buying pressures are exhausted and the stock once again begins to falter. The positive price reaction to the decline that formed bottom#1 is complete. Technical traders call this the reaction high. Amid continued negative fundamental news, short sellers return and bullish speculators decide to take profits. What begins as modest selling quickly becomes a route. As the stock approaches bottom #1 volumes remains light and in many cases the stock will actually fall through the previous low on very light volume.

It is at this point in time that pessimism is greatest, there seems to be no legitimate reason to continue holding the stock. Novice short sellers add new short positions and beleaguered bulls who purchased the stock at much higher levels begin to surrender in anticipation of a new leg lower. However the expected big decline does materialize because longer-term investors continue to buy the dips in price. A new rally begins as short sellers are forced to buy stock to cover short positions. As a second bottom (bottom #2) begins to take shape the pace of short covering accelerates and the stock quickly rallies toward the reaction high. Although the rally is sharp, volume remains light.

It is at this point that a new wave of bad news hits the stock price. Bearish investors feel vindicated and the stock slumps back toward bottoms #1 and #2. It is at this point in time that pessimism is greatest, there seems to be no legitimate reason to continue holding the stock. New short sellers add short positions and beleaguered bulls that purchased the stock at much higher levels finally capitulate, volume swells but oddly, support at bottoms #1 and #2 holds. Professional short sellers start to sense that the "jig is up", the stock is not going down.

The price begins to stabilize and a third bottom (bottom #3) becomes apparent. Suddenly, the flow of news becomes less pessimistic, short sellers begin to panic and a massive rally ensues. The stock rallies through the peak set between bottoms #2 and #3. On the chart three equal bottoms are created, the triple bottom is in place. In many cases triple bottoms lead to important rallies because a vital support level has been established at both the bottoms and the reaction high.

[Frhstck]

Kann mir jemand den Realtimekurs von Amerika durchgeben?

Danke

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.130
High: 0.130
Low: 0.130
Open: 0.130
Change: -0.01
Volume: 14,700


Bid: 0.050
Ask: 0.135
Bid/Ask Size: 83,500 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: -0.8%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/30/04 - 10:06 a.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


09:43:42 0.130 5000 OTCBB
09:40:37 0.130 5000 OTCBB at Ask
09:37:21 0.130 4000 OTCBB at Ask
09:36:14 0.130 700 OTCBB at Ask
N/A N/A N/A OTCBB
N/A N/A N/A OTCBB
N/A N/A

[Frhstck]

@ kaliho

Danke erstmal für die Realtimekurse. Wann denkst du wird der Aufwärtstrend fortgesetzt?


Bid: 0.050
Ask: 0.135
Bid/Ask Size: 83,500 / 5,000

Bid 0.050 ? wie muss man das verstehen?

[Frhstck]

Es dürfen auch andere Teilnehmer zu Posting 3229 Stellung nehmen.

Danke

[kaliho]

meiner meinung nach dauert es noch etwas....

nicht diese woche.

[fohrenburg]

FRA 25K für mich zu 0,11 Euronen !!

[Frhstck]

@fohrenberg

Realtime 0,11?

[fohrenburg]

Ziel :



..200 Dayline !!

[fohrenburg]

Sorry doch für 0,108 Euronen !!

[Frhstck]

Umgerecht zum Schlusskurs in Amerika müsste der Kurs bei ca. 10 cent stehen - tut er aber nicht - komisch oder?

[kaliho]

@Frhstck


wird hier immer etwas hoeher gehandelt.

[kaliho]

Latest Quote


Last: 0.133
Close: 0.133
High: 0.133
Low: 0.120
Open: 0.122
Change: +0.01
Volume: 251,400


Bid: 0.120
Ask: 0.133
Bid/Ask Size: 33,400 / 5,000


52 Wk High: 0.750
52 Wk Low: 0.093
%Change: 9.0%


Market Cap: N/A
Price/Sales: N/A
EPS: $0.00
P/E Ratio: N/A


Market Data Powered By ComStock
08/31/04 - 4:29 p.m. Eastern -- No Quote Delay.

Last 10 trades


Time Price Volume Exchange Info


15:20:28 0.133 2400 OTCBB
15:08:21 0.130 5000 OTCBB
14:12:37 0.125 1000 OTCBB at Bid
14:10:05 0.125 10000 OTCBB at Bid
13:28:26 0.122 5000 OTCBB at Bid
13:26:25 0.122 5000 OTCBB
12:37:18 0.130 5000 OTCBB
12:33:58 0.120 65000 OTCBB
12:33:46 0.125 65000 OTCBB
12:07:34 0.122 35000 OTCBB

[fohrenburg]

[kaliho]

http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=NPCT&num1=7&…

[joelu]

wer die glaubwürdigkeit der gutenfee einmal überprüfen will, soll sich mal die calypte-threads reinziehen.

da hat sie auch ganz übel gepusht und kursziele von 10$ für caly ausgegeben.

gutefee - laß doch deine jünger bei calypte nicht so hängen und schau mal vorbei. am besten wäre, du würdest deine aussagen dort direkt mal geraderücken und dich bei so manchem entschuldigen. aber dazu hast du wohl den mut nicht.

bei ariva könnten sie dich auch ganz gut gebrauchen für calypte

[Frhstck]

Was ist den heute von Nanopierce zu erwarten?

[shadia]

sie wird langsam gen norden wandxern, aber nicht in 0,01 schritten am tag.

die böden sind allerseits gebildet.

[Frhstck]

Username: shadia
Registriert seit: 02.09.2004

Wie lange bist du mit Nanopierce schon vertraut?

[diegutefee]

Hallo joelu,

Du bist in meinen Augen ein Verlierer, der nicht erkennt,
wann man einsteigen bzw. aussteigen muß! Aber das ist
Dein Problem!

Wie bereits schon mehrmals erwähnt, hättest Du bei Calypte
zu 0,10 bis 0,11 $ genauso wie ich und die anderen ein-
steigen können und später die Gewinne mitnehmen können.
Offensichtlich hast Du dies aber nicht getan! Dann ist
es Dein Problem, wenn Du Geld verloren hast!
Wenn die Marr-Gruppe mitgeteilt hat, daß sie als Groß-
investor zu 0,30 - 0,40 $ bei Calypte einsteigt und Du
es immer noch nicht bemerkt hast, daß Calypte nicht
Pleite gehen wird, dann kann ich Dir beim besten Willen
nicht mehr helfen!

Solche Menschen wie Du, die nur ständig herum meckern
und nicht erkennen, wann man an der Börse handeln muß,
können nicht gewinnen!

Als Verlierer würde ich an Deiner Stelle den Mund halten
und nicht noch das Maul aufreissen!

Calypte wird nächstes Jahr den Breakeven schaffen und
dann möchte ich gerne Dein Gesicht sehen!

Es gibt Menschen, die immer erst dann einkaufen, wenn es
teuer wird!

Ich bin ein Schnäppchen-Jäger!

Schau mal nach, was ich hier vor kurzem empfohlen habe
und wo die Aktien heute stehen!

Hast Du schon von short sellern etwas gehört?
Dann lese darüber nach!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

P.S.:
Ich gehöre jedenfalls zum Club der Gewinner und suche
Vorreiter mit Mut zum Risiko. Wer nichts riskiert, kann
auch nichts gewinnen!

[ToSky]

wenn joelu hier auftaucht sind 1000 % nicht fern.

[AnkerLpzg]

Was sind denn das für Scheiss-Umsätze in den Staaten ?

Will den Wert keiner mehr , weil er bald pleite ist oder was ?

[BRBa]

Diese Meinung Habe ich auch!!! Wier werden doch im Sep.die 0,30€ sehen oder !?

[Frhstck]

Wenn jeder fleissig Nanop. kaufen würde dann sehen wir sicher die 30 cent logisch.

[diegutefee]

Nanopierce wird kontinuierlich weiter steigen!

Abwarten!

Wir werden bald andere Kurse sehen!

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht!

diegutefee



P.S.:
Wenn Kurzsichtige verkaufen, dann kaufen
die weitsichtigen Hellseher!

[kaliho]

bis nach dem kommenden Feiertag am Montag in den USA wird sich nicht viel tun.

[shadia]

@frhstk

ich habe seit einer woche 50k stk.

bin zum dritten mal in nanopierce reinvestiert.

noch fragen?

[kaliho]

@shadia

ja.... zu welchem preis denkst Du diesmal zu verkaufen?

[shadia]

denke mittelfristig an 0,40.

die nanos drehen langsam wieder gen norden.

[Strait1]

Träumer !

[Frhstck]

Langweilig

[AnkerLpzg]

Dieser Nano-Dreck heute wieder ...

[analle]

Wenn Sie nicht wissen, wer Sie sind, dann ist die Börse ein kostspieliger Ort, es zu lernen.

[Frhstck]

Langweiler - wieso tut sich hier an Board nichts?

[Frhstck]

Aufwachen

[Frhstck]

Nach Obducat auch bei Nanopierce ein riesen Anstieg im Anmarsch?

[Frhstck]

Schöner Umsatz auch in Ami Land

[norisbanker]

richtung 0,2EUR sollte es diese woche noch gehen

[norisbanker]

und in frankfurt hat sich zu handelsschluss auch noch was getan

[Frhstck]

@norisbanker

Im Zuge der momentan zurückkehrenden Nano Euphorie garnicht unrealistisch.

[microby]

ganz schön euphorisch hier was?

[tomhead]

Zur allgemeinen Info!!



Rückverfolgung beschäftigt die Branche
Viele Lebensmittelhersteller überprüfen und verbessern Systeme – Einzelhandel setzt stark auf Verfahren der Lieferanten

Frankfurt 26. August. 95 % der Lebensmittelhersteller, aber nur 35% der Handelsunternehmen sind dabei, Systeme für die Rückverfolgbarkeit von Lebensmitteln aufzubauen. Für die Industrie sind dabei Anforderungen des Handels ein größerer Ansporn als die am 1. Januar in Kraft tretenden Vorschriften der EU Verordnung 178/2002. Das zeigt eine gemeinsame Umfrage von LZ/NET und Deloitte Consulting.

Das Thema Traceability beschäftigt zurzeit fast alle Zulieferer und Lebensmittelhersteller, aber erstaunlicherweise nur einen Teil der LEH Unternehmen. Dabei bedeutet die Sicherstellung von Rückverfolgbarkeit vor allem für kleinere Hersteller und für Produkte mit in der Vergangenheit geringem Risiko nicht zwangsläufig Investitionen in entsprechende IT Systeme. Die in LZ/NET durchgeführte Umfrage unter rund 350 Unternehmen des Lebensmittelsektors in Deutschland zeigt, dass relativ viele Firmen davon überzeugt sind , dass sie den zum 1.Januar verschärften Anforderungen des Gesetzgebers ohne Veränderungen oder allein durch geringfügige Anpassungen ihrer Organisation entsprechen können. Auf die Frage „In welcher Phase steht ihr Unternehmen bei der Realisierung von Rückverfolgung?“ erklärten noch im Juni 66 Prozent der befragten Handelsmanger, bei ihnen wäre nicht einmal eine Analyse des IST Zustandes geplant. Die Zahl wird allerdings dadurch relativiert, dass in der Gruppe Handel auch ein Teil Nonfood, sowie einige kleine, selbständige LEH Händler vertreten sind. Trotzdem legt die Studie nahen, dass viele LEH Filialisten sich überwiegend auf die Qualitätskontrollen und Rückverfolgungssysteme der Industrie verlassen.

Bei den Food Herstellern dagegen haben nur 6 % keine Pläne zur Verbesserung der Rückverfolgbarkeit. Umgekehrt haben 73% die Analyse des IST Zustands bereits abgeschlossen und 59% den Soll Zustand definiert. 49 % haben ihren Handlungsbedarf identifiziert und auch bereits Entscheidungen getroffen. 29 % erklären, bei Ihnen sei die Umsetzung bereits erfolgreich abgeschlossen. Bei weiteren 41% wurde die Umsetzung einer verbesserten Traceability begonnen, und bei 24% ist sie geplant. Ähnlich ist das Bild bei den Zulieferern: Hier haben 35% Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Rückverfolgbarkeit abgeschlossen, 35% haben welche begonnen und 27% sind in der Planung. Interessant sind die Antworten der Industrie Manager auf die Frage, was die wichtigsten Gründe für die Realisierung von Rückverfolgbarkeit sind. Hier rangieren die Anforderungen des Einzelhandels wie IFS vor denen der EU Verodnung 178/2002. Die wichtigsten Datenformate zur Kennzeichnung von Fertigprodukten sind laut Umfrage Mindesthaltbarkeitsdatum, Loskennzeichen, spezielle betriebliche CODES und als Standard für die Datenweiterleitung der EAN 128 Strichcode. Bei EAN 128 ist die meiste Bewegung zu beobachten: 29% der befragten Unternehmen setzen nach eigenen Angaben bereits EAN 128 ein, aber weitere 28 Prozent wollen in spätestens sechs Monaten und noch einmal 10 % in zwei Jahren so weit sein. Parallel dazu investieren viele Firmen zurzeit, um von der noch erstaunlich weit verbreiteten manuellen Erfassung von Produktions- und Liefernummern auf automatisiertes Scanning von Barcodes umzustellen. Immerhin 27% der Antwortenden vermuten, dass sie in den nächsten fünf Jahren RFID-Tags für die Kennzeichnung von Waren einsetzten werden. Nicht wenige Unternehmen haben IT-Systeme für das Chargenmanagement oder kaufen sie jetzt. 20% der Hersteller und 19% der Händler sind dabei, ihre ERP- Systeme innerhalb der nächsten 2 Jahre um Funktionalitäten für Chargenmangement zu ergänzen oder sogar ein neues System mit diesen Möglichkeiten einzuführen. Eigenständige Chargenverfolgungssysteme wollen sich in den nächsten 2 Jahren 19% der Industriefirmen und 17% der Händler neu zulegen. Die Einführung von Supplier Relationship Management Systemen planen in den nächsten 2 Jahren immerhin 13% der Retailer. Bereits in Betrieb sind auf Herstellerseite bei 42% Individualsysteme und bei 38% ERP Systeme mit Bedeutung für das Chargenmanagement.

Das ist aus der Lebenmittelzeitung vom 27.August 2004 unter der Rubrik IT und Logistik.


Forscher entwickeln RFID mit Aus-Schalter

Frankfurt 26 August. Wissenschaftler des Forschungszentrums Internetökonomie der Berliner Humboldt-Universität haben ein Verfahren vorgestellt, mit dem Konsumenten RFID-Etiketten an Produkten nach dem Kauf selbst deaktivieren – aber auch erneut aktivieren – können. Durch das endgültige Löschen der Daten, wie des die Metro Group in ihrem Future Store anbietet, gingen dem Verbraucher mögliche Vorteile der Technologie, wie Garantiegewährung auf Basis der RIFD-Daten oder Hilfen beim Recycling der Verpackung verloren. Das Verfahren des Forschertams ist jedoch sehr vorraussetzungsvoll: Zum einen benötigt es mehrfach beschreibbare RFID-Etiketten, die erheblich teurer sind als die Einweg-Tags, auf die zum Beispiel Wal-Mart und Metro zurzeit in der Logistik setzten. Zum anderen muss der Konsument selbsz mit einem Schreib-Lesegerät für die neue Technologie ausgerüstet sein.
Das ist aus der Lebenmittelzeitung vom 27.August 2004 unter der Rubrik IT und Logistik.

[transakt]

Heute wieder abwärts bis 0.095,
mein tip: aussteigen und unten neu einsteigen.

[kaliho]

@transakt

UNSINN!!!

[Frhstck]

@transakt

zu diesem Kurs möchtest du vielleicht gerne einsteigen.

Dieses Posting hättest du dir echt sparen können.

[Kaleidoscape]

So günstig kommst du nicht mehr rein. An deiner Stelle würde ich sofort kaufen, da der Kurs nur noch eine Richtung kennt. Norden!
1. Kursziel 0,20 Dollar und bis Februar 0,75 Dollar !!!

[Strait1]

[Kaleidoscape]

@ Stress1

Schönes Bild von Dir !!!

[Frhstck]

@Kaleidoscape

Dann dürfen Sie schön langsam mal loslegen

[BRBa]

Hallo Kaleidoscape
Dann kauf doch mal 500tsd Stck und wir haben 0,75 USD schon
im Dez.

[Believer78]

Anscheinend sitzt jeder auf seinen Nanopierceaktien, habe ein großzügiges Angebot über 84000 Stück gemacht(weit über akt. Kurs) und keiner möchte verkaufen. Wo sind denn die Basher bzw. ungeduldigen Menschen die ihre Aktien verkaufen möchten?!



MfG Believer78

[Frhstck]

Was passiert Heute bei Nanopierce?

langweilig oder Zock?

[Frhstck]

Bis Ende Oktober/November wäre ein 100 Prozenter schon nett - oder was meint Ihr dazu?

[BRBa]

Hallo Frhstck
ICH warte auch noch auf die 100% aber der Kurs heute sagt etwas anderes aus oder??

[kaliho]

wir haben noch etwas zeit und noch gelegenheit einzukaufen!!

[Frhstck]

@ BRBa

Der Kurs spricht leider eine andere Sprache da hast du recht. Aber wie lange noch?

[Kaleidoscape]

Innerhalb der nächsten 2 Wochen könnte was mit dem Kurs passieren. Mehr kann ich dazu nicht sagen. Schaun mer mal !!!

[ToSky]

#3282
stimmt du hast Recht ,rauf o. runter geht es.

[Kaleidoscape]

Also. Nanopierce wird in den nächsten 2 Wochen als Rakete empfohlen. Mehr kann ich nicht dazu sagen.

[ToSky]

Schon mehr als vorher. provozier

[heikekarina]

Frhstck

ein 100% wird auf jeden Fall noch kommen. Aber garantiert nicht im November 04. Entweder vorher, oder gar ist in 05.
Ist nur meine Meinung.
Und bitte verschont mich jetzt mit Angriffen. Ich hatte Anfang des Jahres bereits das Vergnügen

[AnkerLpzg]

Ein Traumvolumen heute wieder in den Staaten ...

[AnkerLpzg]

Das sollte KEIN Angriff gg. Heike sein !

[heikekarina]

na ja 75000 sind so schlecht auch wieder nicht.
Mal abwarten, wenn es nach oben geht, dann mit einem Mal. Selbst dann, würde ich nicht gleich einsteigen, sondern den ersten Rücksetzter abwarten. Ich schau mir das lieber vorerst von der Außenlinie an.

[Frhstck]

Könnten wir heute nichtmal mit 0,135$ schliessen. Das wäre sehr wichtig.

[Frhstck]

Warum sollte nicht heute mal ein Zock starten?

[rockmaster]

nanopierce zuckt seit wochen zwischen 0,1 und 0,11 hin und her- ein ausbruch könnte tatsächlich bevorstehen...!?

[Frhstck]

Sollte John Kerryder neue Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten möchte dieser vertärkt Gelder in die Nanotechforschung investieren (nachzulesen im Wahlprogramm von John Kerry). Was das für Nanopierce heißen kann brauch ich nicht weiter erläutern.

[ehrenwort]

NICHTS

[Frhstck]

@ehrenwort

Dein NICHTS sagt sehr viel aus und wir wissen alle was du meinst.

[DMKE]

der kurs nervt mittlerweile ...

[kaliho]

das wird noch ne weile so weitergehen!!

[Frhstck]

Wo ist eigentlich dieguteFee? lange nichts gehört davon.


@kaliho

Der 100 prozenter wird schon noch kommen.

[MRASTA]

Meister der Sonne, ohne doppel „ü", schade auch.

allmählich gehst Dur mir wahrlich auf den Keks. Sorry für die harten Worte, aber wer immer noch glaubt, dass Nanopierce was mit NANO zu tun hat gehört einfach bestraft.

Und zum anderen, Bush hin oder her, ist nicht wirklich mein Freund aber eine solches Nanoinvest wirste wohl kaum wieder sehen, falls Du dich mal mit den Fakten beschäftigen würdest. Und Nanopierce hat davon sage und schreibe, nix, nix oder 0,0 abbekommen. Soviel zu diesem Thema.

Somit bleibt den Piercen nur die Hoffnung, mehr IMHO auch nicht.

Das ist Gambling pur.

He, Mann, wir „Alten" haben die blöden Pierces schon über so viele Jahre verfolgt, da fehlen solche Kommentare wirklich. Mache Dich erstmal schlau, bevor Du solch einen Unsinn schreibst und vielleicht noch andere mit in das Elend stürzt.

Wer das Gambling mag, für den ist ein Einstig auf diesem Niveau vielleicht gar nicht so schlecht, nur eine Garantie kann keiner geben.

cu

[Frhstck]

MRASTA

3300

[Frhstck]

Heute m.E. eine günstige Nachkaufgelegenheit.

[Strait1]

*Gäähn*

[kaliho]

das wird noch ne weile dauern.

abwarten und tee trinken

[libertyjean]

NanoPierce Technologies Plans Joint Venture with Xact
Resources International
Tuesday October 5, 10:02 am ET

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 5, 2004--NanoPierce
Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT - News) today announced that it
has entered into a Letter Agreement with Xact Resources
International, Inc. to form a joint venture to produce, market and
sell a biotech yeast beta glucan product known as YBG-2000.

YBG-2000, which has been
developed by Xact
Resources, is a natural beta
glucan immune system
feed supplement refined
from bakers` yeast. It is
used to replace the
antibiotic fast growth
additives that are currently
used in feeds used by
swine, poultry and shrimp
producers.

The joint venture will build
and operate a new processing plant to initially manufacture
YBG-2000 for poultry producers. The plant is to be located near
Savannah, Georgia. Once the joint venture is formed, construction
of the new processing plant will begin and is expected to be
completed within 75 days. Initial output of the plant is intended for
poultry producers. Many of the largest poultry producers are
located in Georgia. The poultry industry in Georgia alone is in
excess of $12 billion annually. These producers, along with others
within the United States, are expected to become the principal
customers of YBG-2000.

NanoPierce will own 50% of the joint venture and will have equal
management representation on the Management Board of the
joint venture. NanoPierce will contribute $1.5 million to the joint
venture for its equity interest. NanoPierce is expecting to arrange
the $1.5 million financing through the exercise of a portion of its
outstanding warrants and from other sources. The financing must
be completed within 30 days, unless an extension is given, in order
for NanoPierce to participate in the joint venture. Mr. Neal
Bartoletta will be the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
joint venture and responsible for its daily business activities.

Mr. Neal Bartoletta, President and Chief Executive Officer of Xact,
said: ``We have firm purchase orders in hand from Lowenkamp
International of Dallas, Texas, and several other sources which
have already spoken for volumes of product in excess of the
capacity of the new processing plant. The plant is designed to
produce between 10,000 and 15,000 kilos per month.`` He further
stated that YBG-2000 will replace chemicals used in poultry
production and addresses the increasing and insistent demand
both here and abroad for chemical-free meats.

At this time, the EU and several other foreign countries have
banned the usage of antibiotic fast growth additives.

In addition, YBG-2000 has shown improved results in the
aquaculture business where it has been successfully tested and
used in raising shrimp. ``Shrimp producers could present another
big commercial opportunity for the joint venture,`` noted Mr.
Bartoletta.

About NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., of Denver, Colorado, USA, is
traded on the Nasdaq stock market (OTCBB: NPCT - News) as
well as on the Frankfurt and Hamburg exchanges (OTC: NPI -
News). In addition to the 12 patents it owns, NanoPierce
Technologies has numerous applications pending, others in
preparation, and various intellectual properties related to
NanoPierce Technologies` NCS(TM) (NanoPierce Connection
System). This advanced system is designed to provide significant
improvement over conventional electrical and mechanical
interconnection methods for high-density circuit boards,
components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor packaging and
electronic systems.

For more information on NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., please
visit its website: www.nanopierce.com.

This announcement contains forward-looking statements about
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. that may involve risks and
uncertainties. Important factors relating to the Company`s
operations could cause results to differ materially from those in
forward-looking statements and further detailed in filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission available at the SEC
website (http://www.sec.gov ). All forward-looking statements are
based on information available to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
on the date hereof and NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. assumes no
obligation to update such statements.

[libertyjean]

Subject: RE: $30M potential revenue?. . .zties and all
From Kknightmcc
PostID 357050 On Tuesday, October 05, 2004 (EST) at 1:41:31 PM
Response To: zties PostID 357006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I spoke to Paul about the press release and he said that the company is realigning itself into the biotech field with this new product and that the likelihood of closing it is very good.

He confirmed to me what zties said about the potential revenues for the joint venture being very good and a major reason for the company`s interest in this joint venture. NanoPierce would own 50%. The required investment would require less capital than some of the other projects they were looking at and therefore would require less dilution of stock to enter into.

Paul also confirmed that Neal Bartoletta has already filed for a patent on the process.

Some of you appear to be under the misapprehension that the biotech feed additive can not be sold in Europe. This is an incorrect assumption. The product is already being sold in Europe according to Paul. An independant facility has been producing and selling the feed additive over in Europe.

The plant they are planning to build is in the heart of the U.S. poultry industry and there are several large poultry producers in that area of Georgia including Claxton Poultry Farms in Savannah, GA, Fieldale Farms in Baldwin, GA, Gold Kist in Atlanta, GA.

I personally have an alergic reaction to antibiotics and other additives that are used in poultry feed and would like to see some changes made there. Perhaps this new additive will change that.

As to the concerns about the ``abandonment`` as listed in the 10K, the company has not abandoned the invention, only the applications. There is more on the subject as listed in the USPTO.gov site at: http://www.uspto.gov/main/glossary /

A patent application becomes abandoned for failure to file a complete and proper reply as the condition of the application may require within the time period provided under 37 CFR § 1.134 and § 1.136 unless an Office action indicates otherwise.

Abandonment may be either of the invention or of an application. An abandoned application, in accordance with 37 CFR §§ 1.135 and 1.138, is one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications.

-- see MPEP 711 for more
-- see express abandonment


An application that has been declared abandoned is ``dead`` and no longer pending. Abandonment occurs under several circumstances. The most common reason is when the USPTO does not receive a response to an Office Action letter from an applicant within 6 months from the date the Office action letter was mailed. Another instance is when the USPTO does not receive a Statement of Use (or request for an extension of time to file a statement of use) from an applicant within 6 months from the issuance of a Notice of Allowance). Applications abandoned for failure to respond to an Office Action or a Notice of Allowance can be revived or reinstated in certain circumstances. For more information, see Petition to Revive and Request for Reinstatement

[Kaleidoscape]

Kann das mal einer einer in Deutsch zusammenfassen ?

[gabi]

wusste gar nicht, dass man mit RFID hühnerfutter aufpeppen kann. ja nanotechnologie ist ein weites feld. lol

aber, dass dieser paul ein schräger vogel ist war mir schon klar. liegt hierin der zusammenhang??

habe echt selten bei einer pr so gelacht...

[ehrenwort]

@ Kaleidoscape:

Ich werde es versuchen - in 5 Worten:
NanoPierce steigt ins Hühnerfuttergeschäft ein.

[libertyjean]

eigentlich hatte Pauli schon lange hingedeutet, daß
er Beteiligungen bei Firmen suchte, die nicht unbedingt
mit Nanotech zu tun haben.
Nanopierce hat sowieso mit Nanotechnologie auch nichts zu tun.
Ansonsten strebt NPCT immer weiter eine Beteiligungsfirma
zu werden.
Hauptsache ist, daß die Kohlen stimmen

[Frhstck]

Der erste Kurs sieht doch ganz in Ordnung aus. Es wäre schön wenn wir die 0,14 $ heute brechen würden so wie gestern kurz angedeuted.

[libertyjean]

Demnächst wird NPCT natürlich in
Poultrypierce Group umbennant !

[skilos]

Ich sehe hier mind 100 % drinn !!!




Bis die tage dann sehen wir ob ich wieder recht habe!!

Schaut ihr bei WKN 801473 rein +90 %

[skilos]

Hier wird gessamelt ohne ende und keine merkt das,die tage werden weniger bis das große ausbruch kommt !!!!

cRAPIDTRON KAUFEN !!!!!

[Indie.Jana]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[Frhstck]

Es ist immer wieder zu beobachten das an bestimmten Tagen stark gekauft wird (siehe Frankfurt). Für mich steckt da eindeutig mehr dahinter. Das kann nicht mehr lange dauern bis NIP ins Rollen kommt.

[AnkerLpzg]

Der "Umsatz" in den Staaten ist doch mehr als bescheiden ...

Kennt die dort überhaupt jemand ???

[kaliho]

StockGate: `Dateline` Naked Short Feature Now Said To Be Imminent

Oct 7, 2004 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) The Faulking Truth (www.faulkingtruth.com) has reported that the ``Dateline NBC`` feature from the General Electric (NYSE: GE) unit is still being produced, and may wrap up in time for a bombastic debut before the elections three weeks from now.

The online publication also reported yet another lawsuit by the O`Quinn legal combine, this one naming E*Trade (NYSE: ET), Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC), among others as defendants.

There was some speculation that when O`Quinn`s suit on behalf of Jag Media Holdings (OTCBB: JGMHA; OTC: JAGH) was dismissed due to filing deficiencies, it might have cooled Dateline`s interest.

Not so, reports Mark Faulk, who published a dialogue between himself and Sharon Hoffman, who he said is the producer working on the StockGate piece:

``Sharon, I have information that you are planning to air the segment on the stock market scandal

`sometime in the next three weeks`. My sources, which are extremely credible, have told me that they are `90% certain that it will air before the election on Nov. 2`.

``As always, I would love to have some kind of confirmation from you that this is accurate.``

His published response purportedly from Hoffman:

``Mr. Faulk: Thanks for your email. We are, in fact, still shooting interviews for the story, and it does not yet have a scheduled air date. I will definitely email you to alert you to the air date as soon as I know what it is, since I know you and your readers have a strong interest in the subject. Regards, Sharon Hoffman.``

``In answer to my followup question about whether the segment will air before the election, Faulk said, ``Hoffman told me that `there is a chance we`ll air before the election, but also a chance that we won`t. I`ll let you know when I know`.``

The reportage is said to focus on allegations that ``brokers, through their wholly owned clearing house system, the Depository Trust Corporation (DTCC), have effectively been creating counterfeit shares of stock through their `Stock Borrow Program`, which allows brokers to `borrow` the same shares over and over again, artificially inflating the share count and driving the price of the stock down. They also claim that the governing body that has been entrusted with the task of protecting the individual investors, the self-proclaimed `Investor`s Advocate`, the SEC, has failed to protect investors, and has succumbed to pressure from the brokers who profit from the naked short selling scandal, said Faulk.

``We have also confirmed that several states have opened investigations into the naked short selling scandal, including Nevada , Washington, California, Florida, and Louisiana. In fact, Louisiana has filed a criminal subpoena against Paine Webber for failure to deliver shares of Nutek, a Las Vegas, Nevada holding company. According to our sources, several other states are considering similar investigations,`` said Faulk.

The campaign against illegal and manipulative naked short selling suffered a major blow recently as a U.S. District Judge dismissed Jag Media Holdings` (OTC: JAGH) suit upon a motion by some 75 defendants, including A.G. Edwards (NYSE: AGE) and Citigroup`s (NYSE: C) Citibank.

It left leaders of the campaign disillusioned at the quality of legal work being performed by the vaunted law firms Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry.

According to Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) reporter Carol Remond who first broke the story, Jag Media and Gary Valinoti, the company`s former chief executive, sued over 100 brokerage firms, investment firms and financial institutions in July 2002, alleging that they entered into a civil conspiracy and concert of action to short sell Jag Media`s stock.

Stockgate, a growing global malady, is being contested on multiple levels, including judicial, legislative and political.

Delegates to the September 20 annual SEC Forum on Small Business passed several resolutions on the issue to be submitted to the SEC. Among them were:

1. Extend Reg. SHO to apply to all publicly traded companies including non-reporting companies.

2. Recommend that the SEC Commissioners reinstate the proposed provision in Regulation SHO that prohibited a selling shareholder from withdrawing his/her profits from the trade until after delivery of the underlying sold shares.

3. SEC should require all SROs, and any clearinghouse for an SRO that receives securities into accounts for security holders to disclose the fact of the ability to loan the securities in the accounts and allow security holders to opt out of allowing the securities to be loaned.

Robert Shapiro, chair of Sonecon LLC, an economic advisory firm and former Under Secretary of Commerce from 1998 to 2001 and principal economic advisor to President William Clinton in his 1992 campaign, has expressed ``serious concerns about the impact of the final version of Regulation SHO regarding short sales on the equity and transparency of our equity markets.``

Shapiro holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University and has been a Fellow of the National Bureau

of Economic Research, the Brookings Institution, and Harvard University.

Shapiro said the SEC is correct to broaden the terms of regulation of short sales, and applauded the section directing broker dealers to mark all equity orders as ``long,`` ``short`` or ``short exempt.`` More important, he said, the new ``locate and delivery`` requirements could substantially reduce stock manipulation carried out through naked short sales -- but only if those requirements are

widely applied and strictly enforced.

``Unfortunately, Regulation SHO does not meet either of these two standards. The troubling result is that the Regulation, in effect, establishes an official level of tolerance for unsettled or naked short sales,`` Shapiro charged.

Shapiro said he strongly concurs with the comments of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) on the draft rule, which said NASAA was ``unable to determine why the Commission proposes to permit significant settlement failures at all. While there are instances when settlement may be legitimately delayed, existing regulations provide for extensions for settlement. If the Commission continues to allow settlement failures, it may well facilitate the harm that the proposal is designed to remedy.``

``Until Regulation SHO, this economic counterfeiting has been facilitated by electronic record keeping and the apparent practice of the DTCC and its subsidiary National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) of often disregarding persistent unsettled short positions. With Regulation SHO, the SEC has provided its implicit imprimatur for the same practice in cases covering the vast majority of public companies and billions of dollars.``

Shapiro urged the SEC to ``reconsider the provisions of Regulations SHO and, at a minimum, apply the `locate and delivery` requirements for threshold securities to all short sale transactions, and adopt a zero-tolerance policy for significant settlement failures. American investors should feel confident that the SEC will ensure the integrity of every equity transaction they undertake and fully protect their right to receive what they have paid for.``

While the battle is still waged in the U.S., some of the threats to small investors` investments are being exacted overseas. Despite some 250 companies winning their exit pass, the FaulkingTruth.com website reported that dozens of companies are still being refused delistings from the Berlin-Bremin Exchange, including ImageWare Systems (AMEX: IW) and Action Products International (NASDAQ: APII). FinancialWire also reported that Sontra Medical Corp. (NASDAQ: SONT) is among those whose shares Berlin has resisted delisting.

In all, Faulk said Berliner Freiverkehr CEO Holger Timm reported he has been asked by 386 firms to cease their trading. He is said to have balked at the term delisting, noting that ``Trading foreign shares on the third-tier market segment at the Berlin or any other German exchange is not being regarded as a `listing`, therefore it is incorrect to use the term `delisting` if a company wants to cease trading.``

FaulkingTruth said others refused delistings include Endevco Inc. (OTCBB: ENDE), Limelight Media Group (OTCBB: LMMG), IpVoice Communications (OTCBB: IPVO), now NewMarket Technology Inc, (OTCBB: NMKT), Force Protection (OTCBB: FRCP), Cyber Digital Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD), and XRAYMEDIA (OTCBB:XRYM). Others mentioned yesterday included Military Communications Technology (OTCBB: MLTA), Dalrada Financial Corp. (OTCBB: DRDF), and Mannatech Inc. (NASDAQ: MTEX).

Timm sent a letter to companies asking to be delisted, which promised if ``after considering the above aspects, should you still prefer your stocks not to be traded in Germany we will respect your wish and apply for delisting on the Berlin stock exchange.``

However, for dozens of companies, that appears to have been an empty offer.

In a comment letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Larry Thompson, Managing Director and Senior Deputy General Counsel for the DTCC, said it is a violation of Section 17A of the Securities Act of 1934 to impose any process or restriction that would cause delays in the settlement process, said the online newsletter, published by www.investigatethesec.com.

``Although not the intent of the comment letter, Mr. Thomson has just become part of a growing number of people who contend that the most recent short selling reform package out of the SEC, Regulation SHO, may not be in compliance with federal law.

``The letter submitted to the SEC on August 16, 2004 was addressing the SEC`s proposal to restrict all transfer agents from clearing trades on those issuers who created a `Custody Only``` restriction on the trading of their securities,`` noted the newsletter.

``Many companies have, in the past sought out this `self-help` measure to reduce the abuses of naked short selling. Without regulatory support in the fraud this was the only possible means of protection available to these issuers. Thomson, whose agency would stand to lose business by this `Custody Only` style of trading, was agreeing with the SEC`s proposal when he ventured into the legal aspects of the issuers proposed restrictions.

``His legal points, presumably unintended, actually shot squarely across the bow of the SEC`s Regulation SHO,`` said StockGate Today, pointing to www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72404/s72404-14.pdf

``Thompson concludes his opinion letter to the SEC by surmising that the SEC should proceed on with this proposal as written because issuers are not authorized to put restrictions on their stock. For transfer agents to clear these stocks would be aiding and abetting unlawful conduct. The point of law being the settlement requirements defined in Section 17A of the Securities Act of 1934.

``Thus, asked the newsletter, with Thompson ``claiming that a delay in the settlement of trades is unlawful how can Regulation SHO be grounded by the presumption that trade settlements are not a mandatory part of the Markets?

``The SEC, in Regulation SHO claims that 4% of all publicly traded companies have levels of settlement failures that exceed an abusive threshold. They also admit that in some cases the failures exceed the entire public float of companies. These are market conditions not only create delays and inefficiencies but fraud and manipulation as well. The SEC`s final package never addressed forced settlements and forced timelines on the failures but instead simply threatened `future enforcement` possibilities and placed ``restrictions` above abusive levels.

The final Regulation SHO rules are at www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-50103.htm. The trade reporting requirements are at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-54.

Recently it was reported that regulated companies, such as dealers, brokers, mutual fund companies, financing firms, and investment houses, have been told they have to submit revised operating manuals to incorporate changes in the Anti-Money-Laundering Act of 2001 by Oct. 29.

The key is a requirement that regulated firms ``must know their customers`` to prevent money-laundering practices. The firms have to have a procedure to get satisfactory proof of the customer`s identity and ensure that effective procedures for verifying the identity of new customers are in place.

However, FinancialWire interviews with spokespersons at the SEC has determined that individuals may open nominee offshore firms without providing their identities to anyone, and by using a multiple number of such nominee firms can even gain complete control of a public company while never revealing their true identities.

The SEC told FinancialWire that it has no power to require identification of individuals behind such firms.

Columnist Jack Anderson has stated that millions if not billions of dollars are laundered through naked short selling schemes.

Twenty civil cases have now been filed by O`Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle, Christian Smith & Jewell, and Heard, Robins, Cloud, Lubel & Greenwood, LLP, all of Houston, Texas. The consortium of law firms, famed for the giant awards they obtained suing tobacco companies. The group recently brought suit against the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for allegedly participating in the short-selling conspiracy through its ``stock borrow`` program which the attorneys say is nothing more than an illegal electronic printing press for stock certificates.

Lead counsel John O`Quinn said: ``We are committed to the relentless pursuit of justice.``

All this has led to some major changes on Wall Street, if not regulatory attentiveness.

Recently observers were surprised to find a comment letter submitted to the SEC by Mike Alexander, Senior VP of Charles Schwab, that admits outright that brokerages regularly ignore rules and regulations, saying it is not rules that need to be written; it is changes in behavior that is needed.

The comments were directed towards proposed changes in the U.S. settlement system, but could easily apply to other regulations as well.

``Improvements in the U.S. settlement system will only be truly achieved if and when regulations are rationalized to ensure that all market participants are held accountable for compliance. For example, the industry has struggled with the issue of institutional trade affirmation for quite some time now. While the benefits to the clearance and settlement system are self-evident, Buy-Side firms and Custodian banks have been resistant to make those changes that provide for same-day trade confirmation / affirmation and assurance of trade settlement,`` said Alexander.

``Schwab opposes the notion that securities intermediaries such as broker-dealers be required to police compliance,`` he stated. ``The NYSE and other SROs have had trade affirmation rules on their books for some time. However, such rules have not been effective in changing the behavior

of Buy-Side firms or their custodians; nor do the rules provide assurance that the affirmed trade will settle.

``Recognition of this fact is evidence that changes to the settlement cycle not only require overhauling systems, but also changing behavior. We believe that only by holding all market

participants directly accountable for making required affirmations will the necessary changes to behavior,`` he stated at www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s71304/charlesschwab061604.pdf .

``The SEC claims that the number of companies involved in this `threshold security` category is 4% of all publicly traded companies. If in fact it is that small the process is certainly manageable,`` said the website InvestigatetheSEC.com at www.investigatethesec.com . ``It is also the right of every issuer, in protecting their business and their investors to know the status of their stock trading.``

Some were discussing whether the SEC can keep such information private under the Freedom of Information Act.

The marketplace is already upset over promises by the Berlin Stock Exchange, since broken, that it would delist any company upon request.

``Please understand that cessation of trading in the shares of XRAYMEDIA Inc. (OTCBB: XRYM) is not possible,`` the exchange told one such requester.

It`s not just U.S. companies such as Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), and eLinear Inc. (AMEX: ELU) or Israeli companies that have had serious concerns about their unannounced and unathrorized listings on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange.

Meanwhile, Whistler, Sonoran and eLinear have announced they have successfully secured their delistings, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has rescheduled its open hearing to consider the adoption of amendments to Regulation Sho to October 7 at 9:30 a.m. The announcement is at www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig061504.txt .

According to court filings supported by the O`Quinn/Christian legal network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its ``Stock Borrow Program,`` which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been ``listing`` the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control ``Stock Borrow Program`` run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to ``outlaw`` ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The Dow Jones report noted that ``naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. ``Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors,`` and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been ``shorted out of existence over the past six years.`` Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the ``sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy.``

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O`Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on October 7, 2003, the SEC stated ``the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means.``

According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively ``dematerializing`` most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in ``custody.``

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the ``Stock Borrow Program.``

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. ``There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times,`` giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

``Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential `float` in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term `float` meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence.`` Burrell said the Christian/O`Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the ``counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the `Sale of Unregistered Securities`.``

One lawsuit alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the ``stock borrow`` program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that ``open positions`` resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, ``approximated $3,025,467,000`` due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC`s ``Stock Borrow Program.``

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a ``scheme`` to ``manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions.`` The suit also claims that the s have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that ``concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity.``

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC`s October 7 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.`s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned ``NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition.``

Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group, Bank of America`s (NYSE: BAC) Banc of America Securities LLC, Societe Generale`s (OTC: SCGLF) SG Cowen Securities Corp. vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN), Knight Trading Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NITE), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had ``sat on`` the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.

``The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD (``non-member broker/dealers``).

The new rule is on the web at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Knight (NASDAQ: NITE) and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy

The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.

The complete list of those 108 companies include Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTCBB: ADVR), AdZone Research, Inc. (OTCBB: ADZR), Amazon Natural Treasures (OTC: ANTD), America`s Senior Financial Services (OTCBB: AMSE), American Ammunition, Inc. (OTCBB: AAMI), AngelCiti Entertainment (OTCBB: AGLC), ATSI Communications, Inc. (OTC: ATSC), Federal Agricultural Mortgage / Farmer Mac (NYSE: AGM) Allied Capital (NYSE: ALD), American Motorcycle (OTC: AMCYV), American International Industries (OTCBB: AMIN), Ameri-Dream (OTC: AMDR), Adirondack Pure Springs Mt. Water Co. (OTCBB: APSW), ATSI Communications,Inc. (OTC: ATSC) Bluebook International (OTCBB: BBIC), Blue Industries (OTCBB: BLIIV), Bentley Communications (OTCBB: BTLY), BIFS Technologies Corporation (OTCBB: BIFT), Biocurex (OTCBB: BOCX). Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (OTCBB: BDLF), Chattem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTT), Critical Home Care (OTCBB: CCLH), Composite Holdings (OTC: COHIA), CyberDigital, Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD). Diamond International Group (OTCBB: DMND), Dobson Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: DCEL), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC), Edgetech Services (OTCBB: EDGH);

Also, Endovasc Ltd. (OTCBB: EVSC), Enviro-Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ENGY), Environmental Products & Technologies (OTC: EPTC), Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (OTCBB: ESWW), EPIXTAR Corp. (OTCBB: EPXR), eResearchTechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES), Flight Safety Technologies (OTCBB: FLST), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), FreeStar Technologies (OTCBB: FSRCE), Front Porch Digital,

Inc. (OTCBB: FPDI), Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (OTCBB: GETC), Genesis Intermedia (OTC: GENI), GeneMax Corp. (OTCBB: GMXX), Global Explorations Inc (OTC: GXXL), Global Path (OTCBB: GBPI), GloTech Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: GTHI), Green Dolphin Systems (OTCBB: GLDS), Group Management (OTCBB: GPMT), Hop-On (OTC: HPON), H-Quotient, Inc., (OTCBB: HQNT), Hyperdynamics Corp. (OTCBB: HYPD), International Biochem (OTCBB: IBCL), Intergold Corp. (OTCBB: IGCO), International Broadcasting Corporation (OTCBB: IBCS), InternetStudios, Inc. (OTCBB: ISTO), ITIS Holdings (OTCBB: ITHH), Investco Corp. (OTCBB: IVCO), Lair Holdings (OTC: LAIR), Lifeline BioTechnologies Inc. (OTC: LBTT), Life Energy & Technology (OTCBB: LETH), MBIA (NYSE: MBI);

Also, MegaMania Interactive (OTC: MNIA), MetaSource Group, Inc. (OTCBB: MTSR),Midastrade.com (OTC: MIDS), Make Your Move (OTCBB: MKMV), Medinah Minerals (OTC: MDMN), MSM Jewelry Corp. (OTC: MSMC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NPCT), Nutra Pharmaceutical (OTCBB: NPHC), Nutek (OTCBB: NUTK), Navigator Ventures (OTC: NVGV), Orbit E-Commerce, Inc. (OTCBB: OECI), Pitts & Spitts (OTC: PSPP), Sales OnLine Direct (OTCBB: PAID), Pacel Corp. (OTCBB: PACC), PayStar Corporation (OTC: PYST),Petrogen Corp. (OTCBB: PTGC), Pinnacle Business Management (OTC: PCBM), Premier Development & Investment, Inc. (OTCBB: PDVN), PrimeHoldings.com, Inc. (OTC: PRIM), Phlo Corporation (OTCBB: PHLC), Resourcing Solutions (OTC: RESG), Reed Holdings (OTC: RDHC), Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. (OTCBB: RMECE), RTIN Holdings (OTCBB: RTNHE), Saflink Corp. (NASDAQ: SFLK), Safe Travel Care (OTCBB: SFTVV), Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA);

Also, Sionix Corp. (OTCBB: SINX), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Starmax Technologies (OTC: SMXIF), Storage Suites America (OTC: SSUA), Suncomm Technologies (OTC: STEH), Sports Resorts International (NASDAQ: SPRI), Technology Logistics (OTC: TLOS), Swiss Medica, Inc. (OTCBB: SWME), Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB: TNTI), Tidelands Oil (OTCBB: TIDE), Titan Construction (OTC: TTCS), Trezac Corp. (OTCBB: TRZAV), Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP), Valesc Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: VLSHV), Vega Atlantic (OTCBB: VGAC), Viragen (AMEX: VRA), Viragen International (OTCBB: VGNI), Vista Continental Corporation, (OTCBB: VICC), Viva International (OTCBB: VIVI), Vtex Energy (OTCBB: VXENE) and Wizzard Software (OTCBB: WIZD), WorldTradeShow.com (OTC: WTSW) and Y3K Secure Enterprise Software, Inc. (OTCBB: YTHK).

Earlier in 2003, the SEC fined Rhino Advisors, Inc., $1 million for its representation of Amro International in the financing and manipulation of Sedona Corp. Amro, also known as AMRO, was registered in Panama, a secretive offshore haven, but was not named in the SEC settlement. Another 60 public companies may have been manipulated by the fined Rhino Advisors and its indicted principals, or its funding apparatus, Amro.

These include:

All American Food Group Inc (OTC: AAFGQ), Amanda Co Inc (OTC: AMNA), Antra Holdings (OTC: RECD), Aquis Communications Group Inc (OTCBB: AQUIS), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (AMEX: AVN), Bionutrics Inc (OTC: BNRX), Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc (AMEX: BDE), Bravo! Foods International Corp. (OTCBB: BRVOE), Butler National Corp (NASDAQ: BUTL),Calypte Biomedical Corp (OTCBB: CYPT), Chemtrak Inc/DE (OTC: CMTR), Clicknsettle Com Inc (OTCBB: CLIK), Corporate Vision Inc (OTC: CVIA), Crown Laboratories Inc/DE (OTC: CLWB), Dental Medical Diagnostic Systems Inc (OTC: DMDS), Detour Media Group Inc (OTC: DTRM),

Also, Digital Privacy Inc/DE (OTC: DGPV), Senior Services Inc (OTC: DISS), International Inc (OTC: DYNX), Endovasc Ltd Inc (OTCBB: EVSC), Esynch Corp/CA (OTCBB: ESYN), Focus Enhancements Inc (NASDAQ: FSCE), Frederick Brewing Co (OTC: FRBW), Greystone Digital Technology Inc (OTC: GSTN), Havana Republic Inc/FL (OTCBB: HVNR), Henley Healthcare Inc (OTC: HENL), Hollywood Media Corp (NASDAQ: HOLL), Ibiz Technology Corp (OTCBB: IBZT), Diagnostic Systems Inc/FL (OTCBB: IMDS), Imaging Technologies (OTCBB: IMTO), Integrated Surgical Systems Inc (OTCBB: RDOC),

Also, Interferon Sciences Inc (OTC: IFSC), Interiors Inc (OTC: ITRNA), Laminaire Corp (OTC: THMZ), Medisys Technologies Inc (OTC: SCEP), Milestone Scientific Inc/NJ (AMEX: MS), Nevada Manhattan Group Inc (OTC: NVMH), Innovations Inc (OTCBB: NTGE),Systems Group (OTC: OSYM), Pacific Systems Control Technology Inc (OTCBB: PFSY), Professional Transportation Group Ltd Inc (OTC: TRUC), Rnethealth Inc (OTC: RNTT),

Also, Sand Technology Inc (NASDAQ: SNDT), Sedona Corp (OTCBB: SDNA), Silverado Foods Inc (OTC: SVFO), Stockgroup Information Systems (OTCBB: SWEB) Surgilight Inc (OTC: SRGL), Tasty Fries Inc (OTCBB: TFRY), Tech Laboratories Inc (OTCBB: TCHL), Teltran International Group Ltd (OTC: TLTG), Titan Motorcycle Co of America Inc (OTC: TMOTQ), Trans Energy Inc (OTCBB: TSRG), Motorcycle Co (OTC: UMCC), Universal Communication Systems Inc (OTCBB: UCSY), Medical Systems Inc (OTC: UMSI), Vianet Technologies Inc (OTC: VNTK),Viragen Inc (AMEX: VRA), Webcatalyst Inc (OTC: WBCL), Worldwide Wireless Networks Inc (OTCBB: WWWNQ), and ZAP (OTCBB: ZAPZ).

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on www.financialwire.net

[kaliho]

uebrigends.... der Klage streitwert gegen DTC ist $25 millionen

[Frhstck]

Der eigentliche Kurswert nach Umrechnung sollte bei 10 cent liegen und nicht bei 0,094. Das verstehe ich nicht so richtig. Klärung?

[MRASTA]

Friday, October 8

Worldlabel.com patents process for accurate embedding of RFID tags (Chips) into self-adhesive paper labels both reducing costs effectively and with increased reliability and consistency.

Worldlabel.com, New York, USA - a manufacturer of laser and inkjet labels and barcode labels with presence in the USA and in Asia through Innotech Resources PTE LTD in Singapore has received worldwide PCT patent pending rights for a system and method for batch conversion for embedding RFID tags (Radio Frequency Identification) to RFID Labels. This method to convert RFID tags to RFID labels allows the tag to be embedded into a paper label with varying sizes according to customer requirements.

This system provides a low cost method of converting RFID tags to be embedded accurately into a paper label even though each batch might uses varying size labels and require the RFID tag to be embedded in different areas of the label. The methods allows for mass conversion efficiently. In this manner there is a big reduction in material waste and a reduction in labor costs is achieved as well when compared to the current manual procedure of "Meet, Match and Stick".

Our invention is also user friendly and offers a much faster turn around for converting RFID labels especially when converting separate batches. Tags can be embedded in any part of the label to meet specific situations. As a result, the costs of RFID labels are significantly reduced thus making RFID labels a more favored option in manufacturing, logistics and other harsh environments where bar code labels might not perform.

"We are at the forefront of converting RFID labels. We have done several evaluations and tests and the results have been 100% positive" says Alex Choong, managing director and co-inventor. Wal-mart has requested that all their suppliers start using RFID labels by beginning of 2005. The request by the world`s biggest retailer set off a scramble among companies including Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM Corp. and Sun Microsystems Inc. to develop workable RFID systems. The conditions Wal-mart requires have been achieved by our new method of manufacturing RFID labels.


Typically, about 20% of the RFID labels in a rolls have defective chips, but there`s often no way to differentiate the functioning and nonfunctioning tags until after they`ve been placed on products. Our system and methods of manufacturing increases the reliability and consistency of RFID labels to 100% accuracy. This is important to the end users and manufacturers because it increases their throughput, it decreases the operational time that they need to print those labels, and the reliability of the label helps them integrate other high-speed applications. You can print bar codes on our labels embedded with UHF Class 1 and Class 0 RFID tags with most popular thermal label printers. Embedded Tags can meet the requirements of both USA and European standards.

"We are producing a high quality label with excellent accuracy and at lower cost levels. We are excited, having increased the functionality of labels and started a revolution. We have production capacity and are ready to take on the onslaught." Mr. Choong said.


Our RFID LABELS can be used for:
Airline baggage management
Library systems and rental
Supply Chain logistics
Postal and parcel tracking
Fraud control and identification
Vehicle Identification
Retail, including electronic article surveillance
Personal identification and ticketing

Many other applications
RFID label 6" x 4" meets Walmart RFID label requirements.

See Video



For More information, please contact:

Russell Ossendryver

336 Convent Avenue, NY, NY, 10031, USA
212-234 5775
mailto:[e-mail]


Visit Innotech Resources Pte Ltd, Our office and factory in Singapore

[skilos]

3319 übersetzung:


Worldlabel.com Patentprozeß für das genaue Einbetten der RFID Umbauten (Späne) in selbstklebendes Papier beschriftet beide reduzierenden Kosten effektiv und mit erhöhter Zuverlässigkeit und übereinstimmung.

Worldlabel.com, New York, USA - ein Hersteller Laser und Tintenstrahlder aufkleber und der Strichkodeaufkleber mit Anwesenheit in den USA und in Asien durch Innotech Betriebsmittel PTE Ltd. in Singapur hat weltweite schwebende Rechte des PCT Patentes für ein System und eine Methode für Reihe Umwandlung für das Einbetten der RFID Umbauten (Hochfrequenz-Kennzeichnung) zu den RFID Aufklebern empfangen. Diese Methode, zum der RFID Umbauten in RFID Aufkleber umzuwandeln erlaubt, daß der Umbau in einen Papieraufkleber mit unterschiedlichen Größen entsprechend Kunde Anforderungen eingebettet wird.

Dieses System liefert eine preiswerte Methode des Umwandelns in einen Papieraufkleber der genau eingebettet zu werden RFID Umbauten, obwohl der Gebrauch jeder Reihe Macht, der Größe Aufkleber verändert und erfordert den RFID Umbau, in den unterschiedlichen Bereichen des Aufklebers eingebettet zu werden. Die Methoden läßt Massenumwandlung leistungsfähig zu. In dieser Weise gibt es eine grosse Verringerung der Materialvergeudung und eine Verringerung der Arbeitskosten wird außerdem erzielt, wenn sie mit dem gegenwärtigen manuellen Verfahren „des Treffens, des Gleichen und des Stockes“ verglichen wird.

Unsere Erfindung ist auch benutzerfreundlich und bietet eine viel schnellere Umdrehung herum für das Umwandeln der RFID Aufkleber an, besonders wenn sie unterschiedliche Reihen umwandelt. Umbauten können in irgendeinem Teil des Aufklebers eingebettet werden, um spezifische Situationen zu treffen. Infolgedessen werden die Kosten der RFID Aufkleber erheblich RFID Aufkleber eine bevorzugte Option in der Herstellung, in der Logistik und in anderen rauhen Klimas folglich ausübend verringert, in denen Strichkodeaufkleber nicht durchführen konnten.

„Wir sind an der vordersten Reihe des Umwandelns der RFID Aufkleber. Wir haben einige Auswertungen getan und Tests und die Resultate sind das 100%-Positiv“ sagt Alex Choong, geschäftsführender Geschäftsführer und Coerfinder gewesen. Wal-Handelszentrum hat daß ihr ganzer Lieferanten Anfang mit RFID Aufklebern durch Anfang 2005 verlangt. Der Antrag durch den größten Einzelhändler der Welt stellte weg von einer Jagt unter Firmen einschließlich Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM Corp. und Sun Microsystems Inc. ein, um bearbeitbare RFID Systeme zu entwickeln. Die Bedingungen, die Wal-Handelszentrum erfordert, sind durch unsere neue Methode der Produktion der RFID Aufkleber erzielt worden.


Gewöhnlich haben ungefähr 20% der RFID Aufkleber in Rollen defekte Späne, aber es gibt häufig keine Weise, die arbeitenden und nonfunctioning Umbauten bis zu unterscheiden, nachdem sie auf Produkte gesetzt worden sind. Unser System und Methoden der Herstellung erhöht die Zuverlässigkeit und die übereinstimmung der RFID Aufkleber auf Genauigkeit 100%. Dieses ist zu den Endbenutzern wichtig und Hersteller, weil es ihren Durchsatz erhöht, verringert es die funktionsfähige Zeit, die es benötigen, um jene Aufkleber zu drucken, und die Zuverlässigkeit des Aufklebers hilft ihnen, andere Schnellanwendungen zu integrieren. Sie können Strichkodes auf unseren Aufklebern drucken, die mit UHF Kategorie 1 und Kategorie 0 RFID Umbauten mit populärsten thermischen Aufkleberdruckern eingebettet werden. Eingebettete Umbauten können den Anforderungen von USA und von europäischen Standards entsprechen.

„Wir produzieren einen Qualität Aufkleber mit ausgezeichneter Genauigkeit und auf Niveaus der niedrigeren Kosten. Wir werden aufgeregt, die Funktionalität der Aufkleber erhöht und begonnen eine Revolution. Wir haben die Produktion Kapazität und sind bereit, auf dem Angriff zu nehmen.“ Herr Choong sagte.


Unsere RFID AUFKLEBER können für benutzt werden:
Fluglinie Gepäckmanagement
Bibliotheksysteme und -miete
Versorgungsmaterial-Kette Logistik
Post- und Paketspurhaltung
Betrugsteuerung und -kennzeichnung
Träger-Kennzeichnung
Einzelverkauf, einschließlich elektronische Artikelüberwachung
Persönliche Kennzeichnung und Etikettierung

Viele andere Anwendungen
RFID Aufkleber 6 " x 4 " Treffen Walmart RFID Aufkleberanforderungen.

Sehen Sie Bildschirm



Zu mehr Information treten Sie bitte in Verbindung:

Russell Ossendryver

336 Kloster-Allee, NY, NY, 10031, USA
212-234 5775
mailto:[e-mail]


Besuch Innotech Betriebsmittel Pte Ltd., unser Büro und Fabrik in Singapur

[skilos]

3316 übersetzung :

StockGate: „Datumsgrenze-“ blanke kurze Eigenschaft sagte jetzt, unmittelbar drohend zu sein

7. Okt. 2004 (financialwire.net über COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) hat die Faulking Wahrheit (www.faulkingtruth.com) über dem die `` Datumsgrenze NBC `` Eigenschaft vom General Electric berichtet (NYSE: GE) Maßeinheit wird noch produziert und kann rechtzeig zu einem bombastic Anfang vor den Wahlen oben ab jetzt aufwickeln drei Wochen.

Die on-line-Publikation berichtete auch dennoch ein anderer Prozeß durch den O`Quinn zugelassenen Mähdrescher, dieses ein nennenE*Trade (NYSE: UND), Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) und tragen Stearns (NYSE: BSC), unter anderen als Beklagten.

Es gab etwas Betrachtung, die, wenn Klage O`Quinns im Namen der Zacke-Mittel-Holdings (OTCBB: JGMHA; OTC: JAGH) lag an den Archivierung Mängeln, es konnte Interesse der Datumsgrenze abgekühlt haben entlassenes.

Nicht so, kennzeichnen Reports Faulk, das einen Dialog zwischen veröffentlichte und Sharon Hoffman, den er sagte, der Produzent ist, der auf dem StockGate Stück arbeitet:

`` Sharon, habe ich Informationen, daß Sie planen, das Segment auf dem Börseskandal zu lüften

„einmal in den folgenden drei Wochen“. Meine Quellen, die extrem glaubwürdig sind, haben mich erklärt, daß sie „sichere 90% sind, daß er vor der Wahl am 2. Nov. lüftet“.

`` Als immer, würde ich lieben, irgendeine Art Bestätigung von Ihnen zu haben, daß diese genau ist.``

Seins veröffentlichte Antwort purportedly von Hoffman:

`` Herr Faulk: Dank für Ihr email. Wir sind tatsächlich ruhige schießende Interviews für die Geschichte, und sie nicht noch hat ein zeitlich geplantes Luftdatum. Ich Willensdefinitiv email Sie, zum Sie zum Luftdatum zu alarmieren, sobald ich weiß, was es ist, da ich Sie kenne und Ihre Leser habe ein starkes Interesse am Thema. Respekt, Sharon Hoffman.``

`` In Beantwortung meiner followup Frage ungefähr, ob das Segment vor der Wahl lüftet, sagte Faulk, `` Hoffman erklärte mir, daß „es eine Wahrscheinlichkeit gibt, die wir vor der Wahl lüften, aber auch einer Wahrscheinlichkeit, die wir nicht werden. Ich informiere Sie, wann ich“ weiß.``

Das reportage wird gesagt, um auf Behauptungen zu konzentrieren, daß `` Vermittler, durch ihr insgesamt besessenes Clearinghaussystem, Depository Trust Corporation (DTCC), effektiv nachgemachte Kapitalanteile durch ihren „Vorrat borgen Programm“ verursacht haben, das Vermittler „borgen“ die gleichen Anteile über und über wieder erlaubt, künstlich den Anteilzählimpuls aufbläst und unten den Preis des Vorrates fährt. Sie behaupten auch, daß der Vorstand, der mit der Aufgabe des Schützens der einzelnen Investoren anvertraut worden ist, der Selbst-proklamierten „Fürsprecher des Investors“, die sek, Investoren hat schützen nicht gekonnt und Druck von den Vermittlern, die vom blanken Leerverkaufskandal profitieren, sagte Faulk erlegen ist.

`` Haben wir auch bestätigt, daß einige Zustände Untersuchungen in den blanken Leerverkaufskandal, einschließlich Nevada, Washington, Kalifornien, Florida und Louisiana geöffnet haben. Tatsächlich hat Louisiana eine kriminelle Vorladung unter Strafandrohung gegen Paine Webber eingeordnet, damit Störung Anteile von Nutek, ein Las Vegas, Nevada liefert, das Firma hält. Entsprechend unseren Quellen betrachten einige andere Zustände ähnliche Untersuchungen, das gesagte `` Faulk.

Die Kampagne gegen den ungültigen und manipulierenden blanken Leerverkauf erlitt einen Hauptschlag vor kurzem, wie USbezirk Richter entlassener Zacke-Mittel-Holdings (OTC: JAGH) Klage nach einer Bewegung durch ca. 75 Beklagte, einschließlich A.G. Edwards (NYSE: ALTER) und Citigroups (NYSE: C) Citibank.

Es ließ Führer der Kampagne, die an der Qualität der zugelassenen Arbeit ernüchtert wurde, die durch durchgeführt wurde, vaunted Sozietäten Christ, Smith, Wukoson und Jewell und OQuinn, Laminack und Pirtle, dessen Kerben bereits Klimaziele, die Brustimplantatindustrie und die Tabakindustrie einschließen.

Entsprechend Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) Reporter Lied Remond, das zuerst die Geschichte, die Zacke-Mittel und das Gary Valinoti, der ehemalige Hauptgeschäftsführer der Firma brach, geklagt über 100 Broker-Firmen, Investitionunternehmen und Geldinstituten im Juli 2002, behauptend, daß sie an einer Zivilverschwörung und an einem Konzert der Tätigkeit zu den kurzen auf lagerverkauf Zacke-Mitteln teilnahmen.

Stockgate, eine wachsende globale Krankheit, wird auf mehrfachen Niveaus, einschließlich judicia gewetteifert

WARNING: SYSTRAN did not translate the document entirely. The document exceeds the maximum size allowed by the solution.(4096 bytes for plain text)

l, legislative and political.

Delegates to the September 20 annual SEC Forum on Small Business passed several resolutions on the issue to be submitted to the SEC. Among them were:

1. Extend Reg. SHO to apply to all publicly traded companies including non-reporting companies.

2. Recommend that the SEC Commissioners reinstate the proposed provision in Regulation SHO that prohibited a selling shareholder from withdrawing his/her profits from the trade until after delivery of the underlying sold shares.

3. SEC should require all SROs, and any clearinghouse for an SRO that receives securities into accounts for security holders to disclose the fact of the ability to loan the securities in the accounts and allow security holders to opt out of allowing the securities to be loaned.

Robert Shapiro, chair of Sonecon LLC, an economic advisory firm and former Under Secretary of Commerce from 1998 to 2001 and principal economic advisor to President William Clinton in his 1992 campaign, has expressed ``serious concerns about the impact of the final version of Regulation SHO regarding short sales on the equity and transparency of our equity markets.``

Shapiro holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University and has been a Fellow of the National Bureau

of Economic Research, the Brookings Institution, and Harvard University.

Shapiro said the SEC is correct to broaden the terms of regulation of short sales, and applauded the section directing broker dealers to mark all equity orders as ``long,`` ``short`` or ``short exempt.`` More important, he said, the new ``locate and delivery`` requirements could substantially reduce stock manipulation carried out through naked short sales -- but only if those requirements are

widely applied and strictly enforced.

``Unfortunately, Regulation SHO does not meet either of these two standards. The troubling result is that the Regulation, in effect, establishes an official level of tolerance for unsettled or naked short sales,`` Shapiro charged.

Shapiro said he strongly concurs with the comments of the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) on the draft rule, which said NASAA was ``unable to determine why the Commission proposes to permit significant settlement failures at all. While there are instances when settlement may be legitimately delayed, existing regulations provide for extensions for settlement. If the Commission continues to allow settlement failures, it may well facilitate the harm that the proposal is designed to remedy.``

``Until Regulation SHO, this economic counterfeiting has been facilitated by electronic record keeping and the apparent practice of the DTCC and its subsidiary National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) of often disregarding persistent unsettled short positions. With Regulation SHO, the SEC has provided its implicit imprimatur for the same practice in cases covering the vast majority of public companies and billions of dollars.``

Shapiro urged the SEC to ``reconsider the provisions of Regulations SHO and, at a minimum, apply the `locate and delivery` requirements for threshold securities to all short sale transactions, and adopt a zero-tolerance policy for significant settlement failures. American investors should feel confident that the SEC will ensure the integrity of every equity transaction they undertake and fully protect their right to receive what they have paid for.``

While the battle is still waged in the U.S., some of the threats to small investors` investments are being exacted overseas. Despite some 250 companies winning their exit pass, the FaulkingTruth.com website reported that dozens of companies are still being refused delistings from the Berlin-Bremin Exchange, including ImageWare Systems (AMEX: IW) and Action Products International (NASDAQ: APII). FinancialWire also reported that Sontra Medical Corp. (NASDAQ: SONT) is among those whose shares Berlin has resisted delisting.

In all, Faulk said Berliner Freiverkehr CEO Holger Timm reported he has been asked by 386 firms to cease their trading. He is said to have balked at the term delisting, noting that ``Trading foreign shares on the third-tier market segment at the Berlin or any other German exchange is not being regarded as a `listing`, therefore it is incorrect to use the term `delisting` if a company wants to cease trading.``

FaulkingTruth said others refused delistings include Endevco Inc. (OTCBB: ENDE), Limelight Media Group (OTCBB: LMMG), IpVoice Communications (OTCBB: IPVO), now NewMarket Technology Inc, (OTCBB: NMKT), Force Protection (OTCBB: FRCP), Cyber Digital Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD), and XRAYMEDIA (OTCBB:XRYM). Others mentioned yesterday included Military Communications Technology (OTCBB: MLTA), Dalrada Financial Corp. (OTCBB: DRDF), and Mannatech Inc. (NASDAQ: MTEX).

Timm sent a letter to companies asking to be delisted, which promised if ``after considering the above aspects, should you still prefer your stocks not to be traded in Germany we will respect your wish and apply for delisting on the Berlin stock exchange.``

However, for dozens of companies, that appears to have been an empty offer.

In a comment letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Larry Thompson, Managing Director and Senior Deputy General Counsel for the DTCC, said it is a violation of Section 17A of the Securities Act of 1934 to impose any process or restriction that would cause delays in the settlement process, said the online newsletter, published by www.investigatethesec.com.

``Although not the intent of the comment letter, Mr. Thomson has just become part of a growing number of people who contend that the most recent short selling reform package out of the SEC, Regulation SHO, may not be in compliance with federal law.

``The letter submitted to the SEC on August 16, 2004 was addressing the SEC`s proposal to restrict all transfer agents from clearing trades on those issuers who created a `Custody Only``` restriction on the trading of their securities,`` noted the newsletter.

``Many companies have, in the past sought out this `self-help` measure to reduce the abuses of naked short selling. Without regulatory support in the fraud this was the only possible means of protection available to these issuers. Thomson, whose agency would stand to lose business by this `Custody Only` style of trading, was agreeing with the SEC`s proposal when he ventured into the legal aspects of the issuers proposed restrictions.

``His legal points, presumably unintended, actually shot squarely across the bow of the SEC`s Regulation SHO,`` said StockGate Today, pointing to www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72404/s72404-14.pdf

``Thompson concludes his opinion letter to the SEC by surmising that the SEC should proceed on with this proposal as written because issuers are not authorized to put restrictions on their stock. For transfer agents to clear these stocks would be aiding and abetting unlawful conduct. The point of law being the settlement requirements defined in Section 17A of the Securities Act of 1934.

``Thus, asked the newsletter, with Thompson ``claiming that a delay in the settlement of trades is unlawful how can Regulation SHO be grounded by the presumption that trade settlements are not a mandatory part of the Markets?

``The SEC, in Regulation SHO claims that 4% of all publicly traded companies have levels of settlement failures that exceed an abusive threshold. They also admit that in some cases the failures exceed the entire public float of companies. These are market conditions not only create delays and inefficiencies but fraud and manipulation as well. The SEC`s final package never addressed forced settlements and forced timelines on the failures but instead simply threatened `future enforcement` possibilities and placed ``restrictions` above abusive levels.

The final Regulation SHO rules are at www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-50103.htm. The trade reporting requirements are at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-54.

Recently it was reported that regulated companies, such as dealers, brokers, mutual fund companies, financing firms, and investment houses, have been told they have to submit revised operating manuals to incorporate changes in the Anti-Money-Laundering Act of 2001 by Oct. 29.

The key is a requirement that regulated firms ``must know their customers`` to prevent money-laundering practices. The firms have to have a procedure to get satisfactory proof of the customer`s identity and ensure that effective procedures for verifying the identity of new customers are in place.

However, FinancialWire interviews with spokespersons at the SEC has determined that individuals may open nominee offshore firms without providing their identities to anyone, and by using a multiple number of such nominee firms can even gain complete control of a public company while never revealing their true identities.

The SEC told FinancialWire that it has no power to require identification of individuals behind such firms.

Columnist Jack Anderson has stated that millions if not billions of dollars are laundered through naked short selling schemes.

Twenty civil cases have now been filed by O`Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle, Christian Smith & Jewell, and Heard, Robins, Cloud, Lubel & Greenwood, LLP, all of Houston, Texas. The consortium of law firms, famed for the giant awards they obtained suing tobacco companies. The group recently brought suit against the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for allegedly participating in the short-selling conspiracy through its ``stock borrow`` program which the attorneys say is nothing more than an illegal electronic printing press for stock certificates.

Lead counsel John O`Quinn said: ``We are committed to the relentless pursuit of justice.``

All this has led to some major changes on Wall Street, if not regulatory attentiveness.

Recently observers were surprised to find a comment letter submitted to the SEC by Mike Alexander, Senior VP of Charles Schwab, that admits outright that brokerages regularly ignore rules and regulations, saying it is not rules that need to be written; it is changes in behavior that is needed.

The comments were directed towards proposed changes in the U.S. settlement system, but could easily apply to other regulations as well.

``Improvements in the U.S. settlement system will only be truly achieved if and when regulations are rationalized to ensure that all market participants are held accountable for compliance. For example, the industry has struggled with the issue of institutional trade affirmation for quite some time now. While the benefits to the clearance and settlement system are self-evident, Buy-Side firms and Custodian banks have been resistant to make those changes that provide for same-day trade confirmation / affirmation and assurance of trade settlement,`` said Alexander.

``Schwab opposes the notion that securities intermediaries such as broker-dealers be required to police compliance,`` he stated. ``The NYSE and other SROs have had trade affirmation rules on their books for some time. However, such rules have not been effective in changing the behavior

of Buy-Side firms or their custodians; nor do the rules provide assurance that the affirmed trade will settle.

``Recognition of this fact is evidence that changes to the settlement cycle not only require overhauling systems, but also changing behavior. We believe that only by holding all market

participants directly accountable for making required affirmations will the necessary changes to behavior,`` he stated at www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s71304/charlesschwab061604.pdf .

``The SEC claims that the number of companies involved in this `threshold security` category is 4% of all publicly traded companies. If in fact it is that small the process is certainly manageable,`` said the website InvestigatetheSEC.com at www.investigatethesec.com . ``It is also the right of every issuer, in protecting their business and their investors to know the status of their stock trading.``

Some were discussing whether the SEC can keep such information private under the Freedom of Information Act.

The marketplace is already upset over promises by the Berlin Stock Exchange, since broken, that it would delist any company upon request.

``Please understand that cessation of trading in the shares of XRAYMEDIA Inc. (OTCBB: XRYM) is not possible,`` the exchange told one such requester.

It`s not just U.S. companies such as Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), and eLinear Inc. (AMEX: ELU) or Israeli companies that have had serious concerns about their unannounced and unathrorized listings on the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange.

Meanwhile, Whistler, Sonoran and eLinear have announced they have successfully secured their delistings, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has rescheduled its open hearing to consider the adoption of amendments to Regulation Sho to October 7 at 9:30 a.m. The announcement is at www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig061504.txt .

According to court filings supported by the O`Quinn/Christian legal network, almost $1 billion annually is received by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. for its ``Stock Borrow Program,`` which the lawsuits claim is just a fancy name for counterfeiting, as the DTCC purportedly lends out many multiples of the actual certificates in the float. Apparently the SEC receives a transaction fee for each transaction facilitated by these loans of non-existent certificates, which could knock a hole in its budget should the revenues from the practice be halted.

The North American Securities Administrators Association, comprised of state and Canadian regulators, has pointedly told the SEC that either it must rethink its cozy DTCC relationship, or it hints, some of its more aggressive state practitioners (think Eliot Spitzer) may do the rethinking for the SEC.

Naked short selling is worrisome for hundreds of small U.S. companies, including those recently asking to be delisted from the Berlin Stock Exchange, such as Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM), Nannaco, Inc. (OTCBB: NNCO), 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: FGWC), CyberAds, Inc. (OTCBB :CYAD), Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: PVCT), House of Brussels Chocolates (OTCBB: HBSL), InforMedix, Inc. (OTCBB: IFMX), Tissera, Inc. (OTCBB: TSSR), Americana Publishing, Inc. (OTCBB: APBH), Celsion Corporation (AMEX: CLN), ChampionLyte Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: CPLY), Pickups Plus, Inc. (OTCBB:PUPS), China Wireless Communications Inc. (OTC BB: CWLC), CareDecision Corp. (OTCBB: CDED), Titan General Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: TTGH), IPVoice Communications, Inc. (OTCBB: IPVO), Whistler Investments (OTCBB: WHIS), WARP Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: WRPT), BGR Corp. (OTCBB: BGRR), ICOA, Inc., (OTCBB: ICOA), DICUT, INC. (OTCBB: DCUTE), NHC Communications Inc. (TSX: NHC; OTCBB: NHCMF), Stratus Services Group, Inc. (OTCBB: SERV), Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (OTCBB: GPXM).

Berliner Freiverkehr (Aktien) AG has been singled out as the broker and market maker that has been ``listing`` the companies. It is suspected that one broker, RA Angsar Limprecht, is involved in all if not most of the listings.

Small public companies are squeezed not only by hedge funds, naked short sellers, overseas listers such as the Berlin Stock Exchange, and the out-of-control ``Stock Borrow Program`` run by the governance-conflict-laden Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, but to the amazement of the industry, as often and not by their own regulators.

A new staff recommendation by Annette Nazareth, director of the division of market regulation at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to ``outlaw`` ownership of paper certificates at the same time the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is under intense scrutiny for alleged electronic counterfeiting has begun hitting the small public company markets, company executives, shareholders and manipulative short-selling opponents like the proverbial ton of bricks.

A Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) article by Judith Burns sparked the uproar, as the inextricably intertwined web of connections between the SEC and the DTC, which is sagging from the weight of conflicted governance by representatives from a rollcall of industry heavyweights, including NASD, which owns NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ), the New York Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), to name only a few.

The Dow Jones report noted that ``naked short-selling occurs when sellers don`t buy shares to replace those they borrowed, a manipulative practice that can drive a company`s stock price sharply lower.

The recent lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and OQuinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.

In comments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, C. Austin Burrell, who is providing litigation support and research for the law firms, said that StockGate is more massive than anyone may have imagined. ``Illegal Naked Short Selling has stripped hundreds of billions, if not TRILLIONS, of dollars from American investors,`` and have resulted in over 7,000 public companies having been ``shorted out of existence over the past six years.`` Burrell said some experts believe as much as $1 trillion to $3 trillion has been lost to this practice.

He stated that the restrictions on short selling were deliberately put into the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 because of the first-hand evidence then available that the ``sheer scale of the crashes was a direct result of intentional manipulation of US markets through abusive short selling by a massive conspiracy.``

Burrell noted that the 65-lawyer team presided over by lead lawyers Wes Christian and John O`Quinn has uncovered more than 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts working through more than 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint cooperative effort to strip small and medium size public companies of their value.

Last year, many besieged public companies sought refuge from the manipulation by seeking to exit the DTC, but on October 7, 2003, the SEC stated ``the issues surrounding naked short selling are not germane to the manner in which DTC operates as a depository registered as a clearing agency. Decisions to engage in such transactions are made by parties other than DTC. DTC does not allow its participants to establish short positions resulting from their failure to deliver securities at settlement. While the Commission appreciates commenters` concerns about manipulative activity, those concerns must be addressed by other means.``

According to lawyer Christian, et.al., the DTC is at the very heart of the problem, and has almost a billion dollars a year at stake in keeping the problem.

The Depository Trust Company (DTC) is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, a limited-purpose trust company under New York State banking law and a registered clearing agency with the SEC. The depository supposedly brings efficiency to the securities industry by retaining custody of some 2 million securities issues, effectively ``dematerializing`` most of them so that they exist only as electronic files rather than as countless pieces of paper. The depository also provides the services necessary for the maintenance of the securities it has in ``custody.``

According to the suit, the DTCC has an enormous pecuniary and conflicted interest in the entire short selling scandal through the huge income stream they were realizing from it every day. They have made literally billions of dollars lending individual real shares, in most cases over and over, getting a fee each time they made a journal entry in the ``Stock Borrow Program.``

The Stock Borrow Program was purportedly set up to facilitate expedited clearance of stock trades. Somewhere along the line, the DTCC became aware that if it could lend a single share an unlimited number of times, it could collect a fee each time, according to Burrell. ``There are numerous cases of a single share being lent ten or many more times,`` giving rise to the complaint that the DTCC has been electronically counterfeiting just as was done via printed certificates before the Crash.

``Such re-hypothecation has in effect made the potential `float` in a single company`s shares virtually unlimited and the term `float` meaningless. Shares could be electronically created/counterfeited/kited without a registration statement being filed, and without the underlying company having any knowledge such shares are being sold or even in existence.`` Burrell said the Christian/O`Quinn lawsuits will seek to show that the ``counterfeiting/creation of unregistered shares is a specific violation of the Securities Act of 1933, barring the `Sale of Unregistered Securities`.``

One lawsuit alleges that the DTC has a colossal disincentive to stop the ``stock borrow`` program, booking revenues from services of $425,416,000 and similarly, the NSCC deriving revenues of $293,133,000.

Further, the suit alleges that ``open positions`` resulting from this activity at the close of business on December 31, 2003, ``approximated $3,025,467,000`` due to NSCC, and $2,303,717,000 due by NSCC, and unsettled positions of $721,750,000 for securities borrowed through the NSCC`s ``Stock Borrow Program.``

Nanopierce claims that DTCC and NSCC have joined in a ``scheme`` to ``manipulate downward the price of the affected securities, thereby reducing the market value of the open fail to deliver positions.`` The suit also claims that the s have permitted sellers to maintain open fail to deliver positions of tens of millions of shares for periods of a year and even longer.

It quotes the National Association of Security Dealers as admitting that ``concerns have been raised by members, issuers, investors and other interested parties about potentially abusive short selling activities occurring in the marketplace. In particular, naked short selling, or selling short without borrowing securities to make delivery, can result in long term failures to deliver, including aggregate failures to deliver that exceed the total float of a security. NASD believes such extended failures to deliver can have a negative effect on the market. Among other things, by not having to deliver securities, naked short sellers can take on larger short positions than would otherwise be permissible, which can facilitate manipulative activity.``

The largely unregulated DTC has become something of a defacto Czar presiding over the entire U.S. markets system, wielding more day-to-day influence and control than the SEC, the NASD and NASDAQ combined. And, as the SEC`s October 7 ruling indicates, its monopoly over the electronic trading system appears even to be protected.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.`s two preferred shareholders are the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, a regulatory agency that also owns the NASDAQ (OTCBB: NDAQ) and the embattled American Stock Exchange! Regulators, regulate thyself?

In an era when corporate governance is the primary interest for the SEC and state regulators, the DTCC is hardly a role model. Its 21 directors represent a virtual litany of conflict:

They include Bradley Abelow, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS); Jonathan E. Beyman, Chief Information Officer, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Frank J. Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President, Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney`s Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C); Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD); Gary Bullock, Global Head of Logistics, Infrastructure, UBS Investment Bank (NYSE: UBS); Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc.; Jill M. Considine,Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC);

Also, Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB); John W. Cummings, Senior Vice President & Head of Global Technology & Services, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC); Norman Eaker, General Partner, Edward Jones; George Hrabovsky, President, Alliance Global Investors Service; Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange; Thomas J. McCrossan, Executive Vice President, State Street Corporation (NYSE: STT); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR); James P. Palermo, Vice Chairman, Mellon Financial Corporation (NYSE: MEL); Thomas J. Perna, Senior Executive Vice President, Financial Companies Services Sector of The Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY); Ronald Purpora, Chief Executive Officer, Garban LLC; Douglas Shulman, President, Regulatory Services and Operations, NASD; and Thompson M. Swayne, Executive Vice President, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

In their comments to the SEC regarding Regulation SHO in January, the 50 state regulators, through their association, the North American Association of Securities Administrators (NASAA) issued what many consider to be a strong warning that if the DTC is not dealt with in the final regulations, state regulators such as New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer may step to the plate.

In what many considered to have been explosive comments, Ralph Lambiase, NASAA president and Director of the Connecticut Division of Securities, warned ``NASAA urges the Commission to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the DTC). As a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The ability of the overall proposed rule would be severely impared unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition.``

Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group, Bank of America`s (NYSE: BAC) Banc of America Securities LLC, Societe Generale`s (OTC: SCGLF) SG Cowen Securities Corp. vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN), Knight Trading Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NITE), A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had ``sat on`` the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.

``The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD (``non-member broker/dealers``).

The new rule is on the web at www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion`s (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Knight (NASDAQ: NITE) and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy

The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.

The complete list of those 108 companies include Advanced Viral Research Corp. (OTCBB: ADVR), AdZone Research, Inc. (OTCBB: ADZR), Amazon Natural Treasures (OTC: ANTD), America`s Senior Financial Services (OTCBB: AMSE), American Ammunition, Inc. (OTCBB: AAMI), AngelCiti Entertainment (OTCBB: AGLC), ATSI Communications, Inc. (OTC: ATSC), Federal Agricultural Mortgage / Farmer Mac (NYSE: AGM) Allied Capital (NYSE: ALD), American Motorcycle (OTC: AMCYV), American International Industries (OTCBB: AMIN), Ameri-Dream (OTC: AMDR), Adirondack Pure Springs Mt. Water Co. (OTCBB: APSW), ATSI Communications,Inc. (OTC: ATSC) Bluebook International (OTCBB: BBIC), Blue Industries (OTCBB: BLIIV), Bentley Communications (OTCBB: BTLY), BIFS Technologies Corporation (OTCBB: BIFT), Biocurex (OTCBB: BOCX). Broadleaf Capital Partners, Inc. (OTCBB: BDLF), Chattem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTT), Critical Home Care (OTCBB: CCLH), Composite Holdings (OTC: COHIA), CyberDigital, Inc. (OTCBB: CYBD). Diamond International Group (OTCBB: DMND), Dobson Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: DCEL), Eagle Tech Communications (OTC: EATC), Edgetech Services (OTCBB: EDGH);

Also, Endovasc Ltd. (OTCBB: EVSC), Enviro-Energy Corporation (OTCBB: ENGY), Environmental Products & Technologies (OTC: EPTC), Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (OTCBB: ESWW), EPIXTAR Corp. (OTCBB: EPXR), eResearchTechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ERES), Flight Safety Technologies (OTCBB: FLST), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), FreeStar Technologies (OTCBB: FSRCE), Front Porch Digital,

Inc. (OTCBB: FPDI), Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (OTCBB: GETC), Genesis Intermedia (OTC: GENI), GeneMax Corp. (OTCBB: GMXX), Global Explorations Inc (OTC: GXXL), Global Path (OTCBB: GBPI), GloTech Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: GTHI), Green Dolphin Systems (OTCBB: GLDS), Group Management (OTCBB: GPMT), Hop-On (OTC: HPON), H-Quotient, Inc., (OTCBB: HQNT), Hyperdynamics Corp. (OTCBB: HYPD), International Biochem (OTCBB: IBCL), Intergold Corp. (OTCBB: IGCO), International Broadcasting Corporation (OTCBB: IBCS), InternetStudios, Inc. (OTCBB: ISTO), ITIS Holdings (OTCBB: ITHH), Investco Corp. (OTCBB: IVCO), Lair Holdings (OTC: LAIR), Lifeline BioTechnologies Inc. (OTC: LBTT), Life Energy & Technology (OTCBB: LETH), MBIA (NYSE: MBI);

Also, MegaMania Interactive (OTC: MNIA), MetaSource Group, Inc. (OTCBB: MTSR),Midastrade.com (OTC: MIDS), Make Your Move (OTCBB: MKMV), Medinah Minerals (OTC: MDMN), MSM Jewelry Corp. (OTC: MSMC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NPCT), Nutra Pharmaceutical (OTCBB: NPHC), Nutek (OTCBB: NUTK), Navigator Ventures (OTC: NVGV), Orbit E-Commerce, Inc. (OTCBB: OECI), Pitts & Spitts (OTC: PSPP), Sales OnLine Direct (OTCBB: PAID), Pacel Corp. (OTCBB: PACC), PayStar Corporation (OTC: PYST),Petrogen Corp. (OTCBB: PTGC), Pinnacle Business Management (OTC: PCBM), Premier Development & Investment, Inc. (OTCBB: PDVN), PrimeHoldings.com, Inc. (OTC: PRIM), Phlo Corporation (OTCBB: PHLC), Resourcing Solutions (OTC: RESG), Reed Holdings (OTC: RDHC), Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. (OTCBB: RMECE), RTIN Holdings (OTCBB: RTNHE), Saflink Corp. (NASDAQ: SFLK), Safe Travel Care (OTCBB: SFTVV), Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA);

Also, Sionix Corp. (OTCBB: SINX), Sonoran Energy (OTCBB: SNRN), Starmax Technologies (OTC: SMXIF), Storage Suites America (OTC: SSUA), Suncomm Technologies (OTC: STEH), Sports Resorts International (NASDAQ: SPRI), Technology Logistics (OTC: TLOS), Swiss Medica, Inc. (OTCBB: SWME), Ten Stix, Inc. (OTCBB: TNTI), Tidelands Oil (OTCBB: TIDE), Titan Construction (OTC: TTCS), Trezac Corp. (OTCBB: TRZAV), Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP), Valesc Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: VLSHV), Vega Atlantic (OTCBB: VGAC), Viragen (AMEX: VRA), Viragen International (OTCBB: VGNI), Vista Continental Corporation, (OTCBB: VICC), Viva International (OTCBB: VIVI), Vtex Energy (OTCBB: VXENE) and Wizzard Software (OTCBB: WIZD), WorldTradeShow.com (OTC: WTSW) and Y3K Secure Enterprise Software, Inc. (OTCBB: YTHK).

Earlier in 2003, the SEC fined Rhino Advisors, Inc., $1 million for its representation of Amro International in the financing and manipulation of Sedona Corp. Amro, also known as AMRO, was registered in Panama, a secretive offshore haven, but was not named in the SEC settlement. Another 60 public companies may have been manipulated by the fined Rhino Advisors and its indicted principals, or its funding apparatus, Amro.

These include:

All American Food Group Inc (OTC: AAFGQ), Amanda Co Inc (OTC: AMNA), Antra Holdings (OTC: RECD), Aquis Communications Group Inc (OTCBB: AQUIS), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (AMEX: AVN), Bionutrics Inc (OTC: BNRX), Brilliant Digital Entertainment Inc (AMEX: BDE), Bravo! Foods International Corp. (OTCBB: BRVOE), Butler National Corp (NASDAQ: BUTL),Calypte Biomedical Corp (OTCBB: CYPT), Chemtrak Inc/DE (OTC: CMTR), Clicknsettle Com Inc (OTCBB: CLIK), Corporate Vision Inc (OTC: CVIA), Crown Laboratories Inc/DE (OTC: CLWB), Dental Medical Diagnostic Systems Inc (OTC: DMDS), Detour Media Group Inc (OTC: DTRM),

Also, Digital Privacy Inc/DE (OTC: DGPV), Senior Services Inc (OTC: DISS), International Inc (OTC: DYNX), Endovasc Ltd Inc (OTCBB: EVSC), Esynch Corp/CA (OTCBB: ESYN), Focus Enhancements Inc (NASDAQ: FSCE), Frederick Brewing Co (OTC: FRBW), Greystone Digital Technology Inc (OTC: GSTN), Havana Republic Inc/FL (OTCBB: HVNR), Henley Healthcare Inc (OTC: HENL), Hollywood Media Corp (NASDAQ: HOLL), Ibiz Technology Corp (OTCBB: IBZT), Diagnostic Systems Inc/FL (OTCBB: IMDS), Imaging Technologies (OTCBB: IMTO), Integrated Surgical Systems Inc (OTCBB: RDOC),

Also, Interferon Sciences Inc (OTC: IFSC), Interiors Inc (OTC: ITRNA), Laminaire Corp (OTC: THMZ), Medisys Technologies Inc (OTC: SCEP), Milestone Scientific Inc/NJ (AMEX: MS), Nevada Manhattan Group Inc (OTC: NVMH), Innovations Inc (OTCBB: NTGE),Systems Group (OTC: OSYM), Pacific Systems Control Technology Inc (OTCBB: PFSY), Professional Transportation Group Ltd Inc (OTC: TRUC), Rnethealth Inc (OTC: RNTT),

Also, Sand Technology Inc (NASDAQ: SNDT), Sedona Corp (OTCBB: SDNA), Silverado Foods Inc (OTC: SVFO), Stockgroup Information Systems (OTCBB: SWEB) Surgilight Inc (OTC: SRGL), Tasty Fries Inc (OTCBB: TFRY), Tech Laboratories Inc (OTCBB: TCHL), Teltran International Group Ltd (OTC: TLTG), Titan Motorcycle Co of America Inc (OTC: TMOTQ), Trans Energy Inc (OTCBB: TSRG), Motorcycle Co (OTC: UMCC), Universal Communication Systems Inc (OTCBB: UCSY), Medical Systems Inc (OTC: UMSI), Vianet Technologies Inc (OTC: VNTK),Viragen Inc (AMEX: VRA), Webcatalyst Inc (OTC: WBCL), Worldwide Wireless Networks Inc (OTCBB: WWWNQ), and ZAP (OTCBB: ZAPZ).

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on www.financialwire.net

[Frhstck]

ICH BRAUCHE WIEDER MAL EIN ERFOLGERLEBNIS (DAS LETZTE IST BEREITS 3 WOCHEN ALT)

SOLLTEN UNTER UNS NOCH EINIGE VERWEILEN DIE EIN SOLCHES ERLBNIS BENÖTIGEN DANN NANOPIERCE KAUFEN DENN ICH PERSÖNLICH DENKE DAS WIR BALD MIT EINEM ANSTIEG ( SEI ES CHARTTECHNISCH ODER FUNDAMENTAL) RECHNEN DÜRFEN.

WER SCHLIESST SICH MEINER MEINUNG AN?

[libertyjean]

@ Frhstck
Wir alle! Du mußt aber noch a bissi geduldig sein, und
den "NPCT-Sammlern" noch Zeit lassen. Das Theater dauert nämlich schon seit 3 Jahren, ein paar Wochen länger spielen
keine grosse Rolle mehr.

[Kaleidoscape]

Ich konnte es nicht mehr aushalten. Habe am Donnerstag abend mein großes Paket "Nanopierce" verkauft und habe dann Biophan gekauft. Da tut sich wenigstens was. Seht euch den Chart von Biophan mal an. Es kommen auch immer mehr Institutionelle dazu.
Is ein Versuch Wert.
Aber viel Glück noch mit "Nanopierce".

[Frhstck]

@ Kaleidoscape

Der 100 prozenter bei Nanopierce kommt auch noch und Biophan ist schon viel zu gut gelaufen m.E. die letzten Wochen, bei 1,10 $ ist erfahrungsgemäß Schluss bei Biophan. Aber trotzdem viel Glück dabei vielleicht bis bald

[MRASTA]

echter Spaßvogel, wie ?


#3284 von Kaleidoscape 14.09.04 13:54:43 Beitrag Nr.: 14.283.599 14283599

Also. Nanopierce wird in den nächsten 2 Wochen als Rakete empfohlen. Mehr kann ich nicht dazu sagen.

[skilos]

bei Nanopierce wird mit system der kurs gedruckt und gesamelt.
Wer schlau ist soll jetzt mit sammeln!!

Hier kommen gewinne die keiner mehr glaubt.
Frstck hat recht chart technisch seht sehr gut aus!!!

Gruss

[AnkerLpzg]

Lt. w:o - Kursen handeln die Amis`s heute gar nicht mit dem Dreck ...

Die werden schon wissen , warum !

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

ich würde Nanopierce nicht mit "Dreck" bewerfen!

Schaut Euch einmal "adsx" an! Die wurden auch beschimpft
und nun haben sie es geschafft! Die Hammernews kam heute!
Endlich haben sie die FDA-Zulassung bekommen!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[Frhstck]

Wieso wird Nanopierce on der OTC heute nicht gehandelt?

[AnkerLpzg]

Kann mir nur Insolvenzantrag mit sofortigem DELISTING vorstellen ...

[kaliho]

ich habe schon oefters gesagt....

erst der schmerz, dann das geld.
wer das nicht aushaelt, sollte besser verkaufen.

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[tntxrxwelle]

@Mrasta, Hack, Katzennarr

Ich kann es nicht lassen und muß zu der von NPCT geplanten
Mörderbeteiligung im "Biotechsektor" auch noch meinen
Senf dazugeben.
Was die Beteiligung soll, weiß ohnehin keiner, aber in jedem Fall brauchen beide Unternehmen tiefe Taschen, die
sie nicht haben.

Mein (erneutes) Fazit zu NPCT :

Wie macht man ein kleines Vermögen... ?

Indem man mit einem Großen anfängt.

[MRASTA]

Hi Welle,

sei gegrüßt.

Wenn man sich die letzte Meldung von Intercell durchließt, kann man mal wohl sagen, es bedarf schon einer gewissen Erfahrung, Fingerspitzengefühl und sorgsames DD, um solche Perlen zu finden, dass kann nicht jeder.

cu


Brunetti DEC, LLC Operational Status

On October 11, 2004, Intercell International Corporation, ("the Registrant"), took action to discontinue the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Brunetti DEC, LLC ("Brunetti DEC"), due to the inability of Brunetti DEC to obtain financing in order to support operations. At this time, management of the Registrant is assessing the financial feasibility of the operations of Brunetti DEC and its business model.

[DMKE]

was ist mit NPCT los ?

[AnkerLpzg]

Nichts !!!

[Strait1]

Riesenumsätze !
Kursanstieg knappe 30 %

Was ist los ?

[ixilon]

Von wegen nichts !!!

ixilon

[Frhstck]

@diegutefee

Du hattest recht jetzt gehts wieder Richtung zwanzig cent.
Und das Schlagwort heisst m.u.a Doppelboden und wir werden wohl kurz vor News stehen. Insider kaufen eigentlich seit Tagen/Wochen auf niedrigen Niveau. Bald wird die Bombe platzen.

[samy3110]

erstes kursziel 0,2 $

[Frhstck]

In Amerika wird enorm viel gekauft das ist positiv und das Kurziel von 0,20 kann von meinem Vorredner nur übernehmen. Nanopierce ist mal wieder reif für einen richtigen Zock.

[heikekarina]

nicht so vorschnell.

[frabue3]

ein warmer Regen - jetzt gehts ab

+ 30%

ich hoffe Ihr seid dabei

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

ich bin soeben nach Hause gekommen und was sehen meine
müden Augen?!

Hurra!

Endlich haben wir den Durchbruch nach oben geschafft!

Wer mit mir gemeinsam den Ritt durch die Hölle überstanden
hat, wird gewinnen!

Sollten wir die 0,20 $ packen, werden wir charttechnisch
durch die Decke gehen!

Schaut nach! Ende 1999 sah der Chart ähnlich aus!
Von 0,10 $ auf über 5 $ gestiegen!

Herzliche Grüße und schönen Abend

diegutefee

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

ich habe mir den Chart nochmals unter die Lupe genommen
und stelle fest, daß bei Überschreiten der 0,70 $-Marke
Nanopierce in Richtung 5 $ fliegen wird!

Begründung:
Siehe Chart 1998 bis heute!
Sehr gute Produkte!
Gutes Management!
Das neue Produkt ist absolut einmalig!
Große Nachfrage in Milliarden-Höhe!
Keine Chemie und keine Antibiotika!
Gesunde Ernährung ist gefragter denn je!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[ehrenwort]

WHAT?!?
Ich brauch nengutentee bei so viel Blödsinn!

[Strait1]

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_news.asp?selected=NPCT&text…

[skilos]

Hier werde explodiert, es ist keine zock !!

Bald sehen wir hier kurs über 1 €!!!

[ehrenwort]

Hat hier jemand eine Tüte Deutsch übrig?

[skilos]

Ich habe tüte Euro übrig von meine baldige gewinn !!!

[shadia]

@frhstck

was habe ich dir im september prognostiziert?

[ehrenwort]

@ skilos:

Wenn wir bei NanoPierce den Euro sehen, dann zahle ich Dir einen Deutschkurs auf der Volkshochschule!

[MRASTA]

@ehrenwort

der war einfach gut.


@diegutefee

Ich habe mir lange überlegt, ob überhaupt und wenn dann wie ich Dir antworten könnte.

Ist nicht so einfach. Bin aber in der Regel ein netter Mensch, nur "gutes Mangement" haut eigentlich so ziemlich soetwas von daneben, dass mir nichts rechtes mehr dazu einfällt. Also lasse ich es lieber, sonst bekomme ich noch ein Board verbot.

Von den anderen Nummern will ich gar nicht erst anfangen. Ich frage mich nur, was treibt Dich zu solchen Äußerungen ? Seit wann kennst Du Nanopierce ?

Und wie kommst Du zu solchen Aussagen ?

mrasta

[diegutefee]

Hallo Mrasta,

abwarten und Tee trinken!

Meine Aussagen bezogen sich auf den neuen Partner und
nicht auf Nanopierce!

Schaut mal auf meine früheren Empfehlungen:

- Aastrom, WKN 905286
- Stemcells, WKN 889118

Damals wollte sie auch fast keiner haben!
Ich habe damals fleißig eingesammelt als sie am Boden
lagen!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Meine Devise lautet:
"Kaufen, wenn andere verkaufen!"
Selbstverständlich kaufe ich nur dann, wenn positive
Meldungen anstehen!

[kaliho]

@diegutefee

hmmm... also was ist momentan Deine meinung hier bez. zukunft mit dem neuen Partner, aber auch alleine fuer das NPCT geschaeft.

ziel kurz, mittel, lang?

bin gespannt auf Deine antwort.

MfG

[megane26]

Wäre auch mal an einem Kursziel interessiert. Habe mittlerweile seit 2 Monaten meine ganze Kohle in Nanopierce zu durchschnittlich 0,10 Euro investiert. Die Aktie bewegt sich aber nicht wirklich. Abwohl sie vor kurzem bei Umsätzen von über 7 Mio Stück in Amerika mal + 45 % stand. Dachte, jetzt geht sie ab. Sie hat aber mittlerweile (bei geringen Umsätzen) wieder alles verloren... komisch, oder?

[microby]

[diegutefee]

Hallo kaliho,

ich sage nur: "kaufen"!

kurzfristig: kaufen
mittelfristig: kaufen
langfristig (1/2005): strong buy!

Die neue Fabrik wird Anfang nächsten Jahres fertiggestellt
und das neue Produkt wird in Produktion gehen!

Die Nachfrage nach diesem neuen Produkt ist enorm!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Geduld und gute Nerven muß man bei Nanopierce schon haben!

[megane26]

Weiß jemand wo man die Marktkapitalisierung von Nanopierce ersehen kann?

[ROAR]

@ diegutefee
langfristig bis 01.2005 ?!

du kennst dich aber mit der Börse sehr gut aus !

[ehrenwort]

@ diegutefee:
Da fragen wir uns doch alle: wenn "die neue Fabrik" bald errichtet wird, wo steht denn "die alte"???

[MRASTA]

Moin,

@gute... #3359

Das klingt nach Fakten, wo sind die Belege dafür ? Oder biste Hellseherin ? Ziemlich steifer Tobak, würde ich mal sagen.


Wie dem auch sei, die 30 Tage sind rum. Allerdings gibt es wohl noch eine kleine Schonfrist, falls irgendwas unklar sein sollte.

cu

[kaliho]

NanoPierce Technologies Moves Forward on Joint Venture
Thursday November 4, 11:22 am ET


DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 4, 2004--NanoPierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT - News) today announced that a 60-day extension had been granted by Xact Resources International in connection with the Letter Agreement with Xact Resources to form a joint venture to produce, market and sell a biotech yeast beta glucan product known as YBG-2000.
NanoPierce, in accordance with the terms of the Letter Agreement, is to contribute $1.5 Million to the joint venture for a 50% equity interest in the joint venture. NanoPierce is arranging the $1.5 Million financing through the exercise of a portion of its outstanding warrants and from other sources. NanoPierce was initially given 30 days to complete the financing, but was granted a 60-day extension to December 31, 2004, in order to complete the financing. NanoPierce advanced an additional $75,000 to Xact Resources as consideration for the extension.

Paul Metzinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of NanoPierce, said: ``We have developed a plan for the exercise of the outstanding warrants sufficient to fund the Company`s contribution to the new enterprise. This plan will be implemented during the extension period.``

About NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., of Denver, Colorado, USA, is traded on the Nasdaq stock market (OTCBB: NPCT - News) as well as on the Frankfurt and Hamburg exchanges (OTC: NPI - News). In addition to the 12 patents it owns, NanoPierce Technologies has applications pending, others in preparation, and various intellectual properties related to NanoPierce Technologies` NCS(TM) (NanoPierce Connection System). This advanced system is designed to provide significant improvement over conventional electrical and mechanical interconnection methods for high-density circuit boards, components, sockets, connectors, semiconductor packaging and electronic systems.

For more information on NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., please visit its website: www.nanopierce.com

This announcement contains forward-looking statements about NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., that may involve risks and uncertainties. Important factors relating to the Company`s operations could cause results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements and further detailed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission available at the SEC website (http://www.sec.gov ). All forward-looking statements are based on information available to NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. on the date hereof and NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., assumes no obligation to update such statements.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.
Paul H. Metzinger, 303-592-1010
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
or
Xact Resources International, Inc.
Neal Bartoletta, 954-574-0568
Fax: [phone]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.

[libertyjean]

langweilig ?
http://www.3d-crystal.de/index2.php3

[MRASTA]

Paule bleibt seiner Linie treu, immerhin auch eine Art Beständigkeit.

Ja, warum wollen die denn bei dem Superkurs Ihre Optionen nicht einlösen, tse, tse wär hätte das gedacht. Bin ja mal gespannt wann das SB2-A dazu kommt.

cu

[skilos]

Jetzt KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Signal vom Xetra !!

Xetra NPI EUR 0,009 0,092 + 0,083 + 922,22 % 184 2.000 09. Nov 13:29


+922,22 %%%%

[kaliho]

@skilos

bitte erklaere das signal. ich kann damit nichts anfangen

[traumapfel]

SK auf Tages-Hoch , nicht schlecht sprach der Specht usw. usf.

[skilos]

Ich sage KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Strait1]

#3367 + #3370

[frabue3]

vielleicht sollte man sich ja ein paar mal kaufen

könnte sich doch recht schnell entwickeln!

Heute in USA 0.12

[skilos]

jetzt Einsteigen nicht mehr warten der zug hat die maschine an !!!!!!!!

in Nasdag 0,12 € !!!

[skilos]

Mit diese system wird in Nasdag gekauft !!!!

19:24:21 0,1150 500
19:11:47 0,1200 1000
19:11:47 0,1150 15000
18:47:00 0,1150 1550
18:46:59 0,1200 1600
17:44:48 0,1200 1600
17:44:48 0,1200 6400
17:44:48 0,1150 8000
16:38:55 0,1150 7000
16:30:20 0,1150 5000
15:31:30 0,1150 1500
15:30:25 0,1150 300
15:30:20 0,1150 1000

[skilos]

Aktuel in Nasdag bei 0,125 !!!


KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wenn jetzt loss gehts wir werden bis ende Dezember 1000% sehen !!!!

[skilos]

4.11. 2004


DENVER--(GESCHÄFT LEITUNG)--4. Nov. 2004--NanoPierce Technologien (OTCBB: NPCT - Nachrichten) heute verkündet, daß eine 60 Tagesverlängerung von Xact Resources bewilligt worden war, das in Zusammenhang mit der Buchstabe-Vereinbarung mit Xact Betriebsmitteln, eine Joint Venture zu bilden, um zu produzieren international ist, ein biotech Hefebetaglukanprodukt vermarkten und verkaufen bekannt als YBG-2000.
NanoPierce, in übereinstimmung mit den Bezeichnungen der Buchstabe-Vereinbarung, ist, $1.5 Million zur Joint Venture für ein die 50% Billigkeit Interesse an der Joint Venture beizutragen. NanoPierce ordnet die Finanzierung $1.5 Million durch die übung eines Teils seiner hervorragenden Ermächtigungen und von anderen Quellen. NanoPierce wurde zuerst 30 Tage, zum der Finanzierung durchzuführen gegeben, aber wurde eine 60 Tagesverlängerung zu 31. Dezember 2004, um die Finanzierung durchzuführen bewilligt. NanoPierce rückte zusätzlichen $75.000 zu den Xact Betriebsmitteln als Betrachtung für die Verlängerung vor.

Paul Metzinger, Präsident und Generaldirektor von NanoPierce, sagte: `` Haben wir einen Plan für die übung der hervorragenden Ermächtigungen entwickelt, die genügend sind, den Beitrag der Firma zum neuen Unternehmen zu finanzieren. Dieser Plan wird während der Verlängerung Periode eingeführt. ``

Über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., von Denver, Kolorado, USA, wird auf der Nasdaq Börse gehandelt (OTCBB: NPCT - Nachrichten) sowie auf den Frankfurt und Hamburg Austäuschen (OTC: NPI - Nachrichten). Zusätzlich zu den 12 Patenten besitzt es, NanoPierce Technologien hat die Anwendungen, die schwebend sind, andere in der Vorbereitung und das verschiedene geistige Eigentum, das auf NCS der NanoPierce Technologien (TM) bezogen wird (NanoPierce Anschluß-System) . Dieses vorgerückte System ist entworfen, um elektrische des bedeutenden Verbesserung überschusses herkömmliche und mechanische Verbindung Methoden für mit hoher Dichte Leiterplatten, Bestandteile, Einfaßungen, Stecker, das Halbleiterverpacken und die elektronischen Systeme zur Verfügung zu stellen.

Zu mehr Information über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., besichtigen Sie bitte seine Web site: www.nanopierce.com

Diese Ansage enthält das Vorwärts-Schauen von von Aussagen über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., das Gefahren und Ungewißheiten mit einbeziehen kann. Die wichtigen Faktoren in bezug auf sind die Betriebe der Firma konnten Resultate veranlassen, sich von denen in Vorwärts-schauenden Aussagen materiell zu unterscheiden und ausführliches in den Archivierungen mit der Sicherheiten und Austausch-Kommission zu fördern, die an der sek Web site (http://www.sec.gov) vorhanden ist. Alle Vorwärts-schauenden Aussagen basieren auf den Informationen, die für NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. auf dem Datum hiervon vorhanden sind und NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., nimmt keine Verpflichtung an, solche Aussagen zu aktualisieren.

[Arivalucky]

habe heute eine Kauforder Limit 0,10 Euro 20.000 Stück aufgegeben.
Schaun mer mal

[Arivalucky]

ist ausgeführt zu 0,097 Euronen
also ab heute bin ich mit dabei

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hier gehts bald lossssssss!!!!!!!!!!

[skilos]

Hier wird gekauft ohne ende und keiner merckt das

16:03:59 0,099 43.281
14:35:21 0,097 20.000
14:16:58 0,092 1.500
14:15:56 0,096 4.400
11:44:34 0,098 70.000
10:48:40 0,097 10.000
09:36:38 0,095 6.750
09:08:16 0,090 0

[skilos]

16:17:44 0,100 93.700
16:03:59 0,099 43.281
14:35:21 0,097 20.000
14:16:58 0,092 1.500
14:15:56 0,096 4.400
11:44:34 0,098 70.000
10:48:40 0,097 10.000
09:36:38 0,095 6.750
09:08:16 0,090 0

[skilos]

16:20:48 0,098 1000
16:17:44 0,100 93700
16:03:59 bG 0,099 43281
14:35:21 0,097 20000
14:16:58 0,092 1500
14:15:56 0,096 4400
11:44:34 0,098 70000
10:48:40 0,097 10000
09:36:38 0,095 6750
09:08:16 G 0,090 0

[Arivalucky]

Skilos die 20 K um 14.35 das waren meine
Viel Glück uns allen

[skilos]

November -Dezember und Januar war imer die besten monate für Nanopierce.
Schaut ihr mal das chart an ist sehr interessant !

[skilos]

Arivalucky jetzt nicht unter 1 € verkaufen!!

Bald werden ganz viele noch merken wie schnell hier steigen kann !!

1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 % 1000 %

[skilos]

Das chart stimmt jetzt bessonders gut !!!!

[Knollebauer]

Market Depth For Nanopierce Tech Inc Delayed: Nov 12 12:34 PM EST

MMD Bid Bid Size
HILL ↑ 0.120 50
GNET ↑ 0.115 467 wat macht der denn
SCHB 0.115 50
GVRC 0.110 50
NITE 0.110 50
PUGS 0.110 50
AGIS 0.105 50
CRWN 0.105 50
FLCR 0.100 50
TDCM 0.100 50
BAMM ↓ 0.100 50
EFGI 0.095 50
VERT 0.090 50
DOMS 0.080 50
FRAN 0.080 50
SACM 0.080 50
HDSN 0.080 50
BEST ↓ 0.080 50
JEFF 0.078 50
BMIC 0.070 50
BWNC 0.050 50
PERT 0.050 50
SBSH 0.050 50
SEAB 0.050 50
VFIN 0.050 50
MMD Ask Ask Size
NITE 0.125 50
BAMM ↓ 0.125 50
CRWN 0.130 50
HILL 0.130 50
PUGS 0.140 50
SCHB 0.140 50
TDCM 0.140 50
VERT 0.140 50
JEFF 0.145 50
UCAP 0.145 50
EFGI 0.150 50
AGIS 0.160 50
SACM 0.180 50
BMIC 0.190 50
FRAN 0.200 50
GVRC 0.200 50
SEAB 0.200 50
HDSN 0.215 50
FLCR 0.220 50
BWNC 0.250 50
BEST ↓ 0.290 50
SBSH 0.300 50
VIEW 0.310 50
WDCO 0.330 50
QUIN 0.330 50
Price Qty Time
↑ 0.120 3000 12:28:24
0.115 5000 09:42:19
0.115 10000 09:31:15
0.115 5000 11/11/04
0.115 5000 11/11/04
↓ 0.115 1017 11/11/04
↑ 0.120 5000 11/11/04
↓ 0.115 5000 11/11/04
↑ 0.125 900 11/11/04
↑ 0.120 2500 11/11/04
0.115 500 11/11/04
↓ 0.115 25000 11/11/04
↑ 0.120 33000 11/11/04
↓ 0.115 1012 11/11/04
↑ 0.125 5000 11/11/04
↑ 0.120 2000 11/11/04
↓ 0.115 2000 11/11/04
↓ 0.120 2500 11/11/04
0.125 2000 11/11/04
0.125 9000 11/10/04
↑ 0.125 9000 11/10/04
↑ 0.118 5000 11/10/04
0.115 500 11/10/04
0.115 500 11/10/04
0.115 500 11/10/04

[diegutefee]

Hallo Nanopierce-Freunde,

spätestens im Januar 2005 werden die Ungläubigen !

Wer bis heute immer noch nicht bemerkt hat, daß hier
bewußt manipuliert wird, um einsammeln zu können, der
tut mir leid!

Meine nächsten Empfehlungen:

- Aastrom (WKN 905286)
- Stemcells (WKN 889118)
- Immune Response (WKN 765803)
- HIV (WKN 765254)

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[traumapfel]

Hallo , liebe Fee,

habe auch schon bessere Beiträge von Dir gelesen ...


Schönes Wochenende wünsche ich Dir !!!

[ROAR]

3361 von ROAR 02.11.04 22:35:14 Beitrag Nr.: 14.972.033 14972033
@ diegutefee
langfristig bis 01.2005 ?!

du kennst dich aber mit der Börse sehr gut aus !

[diegutefee]

Hallo traumapfel,

danke für Deine Kritik!

Ich werde in Zukunft mein Bestes geben!

Kommen wir nun zur Sache:

Die Amerikaner haben diese Woche ein langes Wochenende
aufgrund des gestrigen Feiertages, deshalb wurde der
Kurs wieder durch die Shortseller gedrückt.

Charttechnisch sieht es wieder ganz gut aus!

An der Börse muß man Fingerspitzengefühl und den Weit-
blick bzw. Durchblick haben, sonst Finger weg von Aktien!

Seit über 3 Jahren habe ich auf Euro Call gesetzt, obwohl
meine Bank damals dagegen war.

Ich bin erfolgreich, weil ich nicht immer auf andere höre,
sondern nur das tue, wovon ich selbst überzeugt bin.

Mein Geheimtipp:
Wenn alle anderen fluchtartig die Börse verlassen, dann
fange ich an zu kaufen und wenn alle in Kaufstimmung sind,
dann ziehe ich mich langsam wieder zurück.

Bei Nanopierce sehe ich große Chancen, die man sich nicht
entgehen lassen sollte!

Herzliche Grüße und schönes Wochenende!

diegutefee

[skilos]

Firmen-Profil
Technologien NPCT Nanopierce forschen Späne eines neuartigennano.

Technologien Inc.(OTC BB NanoPierce: NPCT)
ISIN: US6300801098
WKN: 916132
Internet: http://www.nanopierce.com

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. eine Technologiefirma festgelegt an der Kommerzialisierung und Marketing sein patentiertes, revolutionäres Anschlußsystem des Elektronikanschlußsystems NanoPierce (NCS). NCS bietet praktisch unbegrenzte Anwendungsmöglichkeiten für die Elektronikindustrie mit seinem meteoric Wachstum an.

[skilos]

NCS™ ist eine erfinderische, vorteilhafte Methode für das Herstellen der elektrischen Beziehungen.





Der NCS™ Prozeß ist scharfsinnig und doch einfach. Im Allgemeinen werden mikroskopische Partikel der billigen, leicht verfügbaren Materialien wie Industriediamantstaub und des Metalls gleichzeitig auf eine Kontaktfläche niedergelegt. Dieser Schritt kann in einer vereinfachten Electro-überzugart Bad leicht durchgeführt werden. Unter geringfügigem Druck dringen die harten Diamantpartikel, die in der Mischung enthalten werden, den Kontakt unter dem elektronischen Bauelement ein und so stellen einen elektrischen Anschluß zur Verfügung. Ein billiger Kleber wird dann mechanisch angewendet, um sich zu verfestigen und den Anschluß dauerhaft zu reparieren. Das Resultat kann mit „leitendem Sandpapier“, obwohl auf einer Skala von Mikrometern verglichen werden. Abhängig von ihrer Größe werden ungefähr 50 bis 200 Diamantpartikel pro Quadrat-Millimeter angewendet. Der Diamantstaub kann in einer Strecke der Korngrößen aufgetragen werden, damit der optimale Anschluß für jede bestimmte Anwendung verursacht werden kann. Auf jeden Fall ist NCS™ ein standardisierter Prozeß, der in jedes vorhandene Herstellungsverfahren leicht integriert werden kann.

Der Nutzen von NCS™

NCS™ ist in Konkurrenz mit einer Anzahl von gut eingerichteten Anschlußmethoden. In aller Wahrscheinlichkeit wird NanoPierce nicht ersetzt jede von ihnen in jeder Nische des Marktes; jedoch bietet NCS™ genügend bedeutenden Nutzen an, um es eine sehr anziehende Alternative für eine breite Benutzungsmöglichkeit Hochfrequenz-Kennzeichnung (RFID), Smartcard und lichtemittierende Dioden (LED) mit einschließen zu lassen. Unter sind einige spezifische Eigenschaften gerecht, zum der Vorteile von NCS™ für Industrie zu veranschaulichen:

* State-of-the-art High-Tech Anschlüsse *



Schnitkosten durch das Beseitigen von von Herstellung Schritten und von von nicht notwendigen Materialien; benutzt die leicht verfügbaren, weniger kostspieligen grundlegenden Substanzen und die Materialien
Speichert Produktion Zeit seit allen Anschlüssen - egal wie viele - kann in einem einzelnen Betrieb gebildet werden
Angebote verbesserten die elektrischen und thermischen Eigenschaften, besonders für Leistung der Hochfrequenz (Rf) - mit erhöhter Zuverlässigkeit
Verkleinert beträchtlich die Kontakte indem das Verringern der Größe, der Zahl und der Kompliziertheit Teilen; erfordert keine Beweglichteile
Verursacht minimale Beschädigung der Berührungsflächen im Werkzeug
Kein spezielles Klima notwendig (z.B. sauberer Raum); kann bei Zimmertemperatur zugetroffen werden
Einfach, in vorhandene Fertigungsstraßen zu integrieren und für spezifische Anwendungen sich anzupassen; der Produktion Prozeß kann schnell und billig geändert werden


Besichtigen Sie bitte die folgenden Web site zu zusätzlicher Technologieinformation:

www.scimaxx.com

www.exypnotech.com



Patent-Mappe




Electroless Prozeß für die Vorbereitung des Partikels erhöhte Kontaktflächen USpatent Nr. 6.630.202
Ausgabedatum: 10/7/03
Methode und Apparat für leitend verbindenes Bestandteile USpatent Nr. 6.096.982
Ausgabedatum: 8/1/00
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.835.359 auf
Ausgabedatum: 11/10/98
Patternable Partikel füllte anhaftende Matrix für die Formung der Patterned Strukturen zwischen verbindendem Oberflächen USpatent Nr. 5.670.251
Ausgabedatum: 9/23/97
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.642.055 auf
Ausgabedatum: 6/24/97
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.634.265 auf
Ausgabedatum: 6/3/97
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.565.280 auf
Ausgabedatum: 10/15/96
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.506.514 auf
Ausgabedatum: 4/9/96
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls verwendet, taucht USpatent Nr. 5.430.614 auf
Ausgabedatum: 7/4/96
Das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls taucht USpatent Nr. 5.334.809 auf
Ausgabedatum: 8/2/94
Die elektrische Verknüpfung, die Partikel verwendet, erhöhte USpatent Nr. 5.471.151
Ausgabedatum: 11/28/95
Das Partikel erhöhte Verbinden des Metalls taucht USpatent Nr. 5.083.697 auf
Ausgabedatum: 1/28/92

Methode für kaltes Abbinden USpatent Nr. 4.804.132
Ausgabedatum2/14/89
Forum zu Aktie: NANOPIERCE TE.
Informationen zu dieser Aktie

[skilos]

VERZICHT

BEDINGUNGEN DES VERBRAUCHES

Bitte sorgfältig gelesen, bevor dieser Aufstellungsort verwendet wird
Diese Web site (Aufstellungsort) wird von ExypnoTech zur Verfügung gestellt, GmbH (ExypnoTech) und kann für nur informierende Zwecke verwendet werden. Indem Sie diesen Aufstellungsort verwenden, bestätigen Sie, daß Sie gelesen haben, verstanden und stimmen zu, durch diese Vereinbarung und alle seine von von gesprungen zu werden.


Copyright
ExypnoTech autorisiert Sie hiermit anzusehen, kopiert zu Ihren eigenen internen Zwecken und lädt unten diesen Aufstellungsort und die Informationen, die Datennamen, die Bilder, die Abbildungen, die Firmenzeichen und die Ikonen hinsichtlich und betrachtet oder in bezug auf sind ExypnoTech und seine Teilnehmer, Produkte und Dienstleistungen an diesem Aufstellungsort nur zu den informierenden und kein-kommerziellen Zwecken. Die Informationen, die Daten, die Namen, die Bilder, die Abbildungen, die Firmenzeichen, die Ikonen und der Aufstellungsort selbst (Materialien) an diesem Aufstellungsort werden Urheberrecht gesichert und irgendein nicht autorisierter Gebrauch von solchen Materialien an diesem Aufstellungsort kann copyright, eingetragenes Warenzeichen und andere Gesetze verletzen. Jede mögliche Kopie der Materialien oder der Positionen muß den ExypnoTech Urheberrechtsvermerk davon mit einschließen.

Sie sind damit einverstanden nicht zu reproduzieren, übertragen nochmal, verteilen sich, verbreiten, verkaufen, veröffentlichen, Sendung oder verteilen anders irgend solches Material zu irgendwie aus dritter Quelle ohne die ausdrückliche prior schriftliche Zustimmung von ExypnoTech.

Sie sind, damit einverstanden, nicht teilweise oder in vollständigem, jedes mögliches Material hinzuzufügen, zu ändern, zu ersetzen oder zu ändern, das von ExypnoTech auf diesem Aufstellungsort angezeigt wird.

ExypnoTech beabsichtigte, kein Urheberrecht gesichertes Material für die Publikation zu benutzen oder, wenn nicht möglich, das copyright des jeweiligen Gegenstandes anzuzeigen.
Der Verbrauch der Registerbezeichnungen, Handelsnamen, Produktnamen, die etc. auf diesem Aufstellungsort sogar ohne spezielle Nachricht nicht, daß solche Namen betreffend Gesetze des copyright und der Schutzmarke frei sind und bedeutet, durch niemand folglich, verwendet werden konnte.

Verzicht der Garantie:
ExypnoTech gewährleistet nicht die Genauigkeit oder die Vollständigkeit der Materialien oder die Zuverlässigkeit irgendeines Rates, der Meinung, der Aussage oder anderer Informationen, die durch den Aufstellungsort angezeigt werden oder verteilt sind. ExypnoTech behält das Recht, in seiner alleinigen Diskretion vor, alle mögliche Störungen oder Auslassungen in irgendeiner Position des Aufstellungsortes zu beheben. ExypnoTech kann alle mögliche anderen änderungen am Aufstellungsort, die Materialien und die Produkte, die Programme, die Dienstleistungen oder die Preise vornehmen (falls vorhanden) beschrieben im Aufstellungsort ohne Nachricht.

Die Materialien stellten an diesem Aufstellungsort werden zur Verfügung gestellt „zur Verfügung, wie“ ohne irgendwelche Garantien irgendwie der Art einschließend aber ist, nicht auf Garantien oder merchantibility, Eignung zu einem bestimmten Zweck begrenzt oder Nichtverletzung des geistigen Eigentums.

Haftungsbeschränkung
Ihr Gebrauch dieses Aufstellungsortes ist an Ihrer eigenen Gefahr. Weder sind ExypnoTech noch irgendwelche seiner Teilnehmer, Offiziere oder Direktoren noch irgendwelcher oder seine Vertreter oder jede mögliche andere Partei, die beschäftigt gewesen wird, mit dem Herstellen, dem Produzieren oder dem Liefern des Aufstellungsortes, verantwortlich für die direkten, indirekten, strafenden, beiläufigen, speziellen, logisch folgenden oder anderen Beschädigungen irgendwelcher, die aus oder in jeder Hinsicht heraus entstehen, die mit dem Gebrauch dieses Aufstellungsortes angeschlossen wird oder Inhalt, ob gegründet auf Vertrag, unerlaubte Handlung, strenge Verbindlichkeit oder anders, selbst wenn geraten von der Möglichkeit solcher Beschädigungen.


Merken Sie bitte, daß einige Jurisdiktionen nicht den Ausschluß bestimmter Beschädigungen erlauben können, also können etwas von dem oben genannten Ausschluß möglicherweise nicht an Sie wenden.


Verbindungen zu den aus dritter Quelleaufstellungsorten und zu den Empfehlungen
Der Aufstellungsort kann die direkten oder indirekten Verbindungen zu den Aufstellungsorten enthalten, die von den Parteien anders als ExypnoTech besessen werden oder bearbeitet sind. Solche Verbindungen werden für nur Bequemlichkeit zur Verfügung gestellt. ExypnoTech steuert nicht, und ist nicht verantwortlich für, der Inhalt an oder die Sicherheit von, solche Aufstellungsorte. ExypnoTech dementiert spezifisch jede mögliche Verantwortlichkeit, wenn solche Aufstellungsorte:

seien Sie ungenau irreführend, unvollständig oder;
seien Sie nicht verkäuflich oder zu einem bestimmten Zweck passend;
stellen Sie nicht ausreichende Sicherheit zur Verfügung;
enthalten Sie Viren oder andere Einzelteile einer zerstörenden Natur; oder
seien Sie libelous oder verleumderisch.
Ausserdem ist ExypnoTech nicht für irgendwelche postings oder Anzeigen verantwortlich, die von den Benutzern der Diskussion Bretter, der guestbooks oder der mailinglists bereitgestellt werden auf seiner Seite veröffentlicht werden.


Rechtskraft dieses Verzichts
Dieser Verzicht soll als Teil der Internet-Publikation betrachtet werden, der Sie von verwiesen wurden. Wenn Abschnitte oder einzelne Formulierungen dieses Textes nicht zugelassen oder Co sind

[skilos]

RFID Bestandteile und Lösungen

icode-net.com - Erhalten begonnen mit Philips I-CODE intelligenter Aufklebertechnologie

Kennzeichnung-on-line - eine Plattform für automatische Datenerfassung mit Fokus auf der RFID Technologie und Markt. (vorhanden auf nur Deutsch)

rfidjournal.com - Die on-line-Zeitschrift, die interessante Informationen über das Verwenden von von RFID bereitstellt.

RFID Handbuch - Grundlagen und Anwendungen der RFID Technologie

[skilos]

Ist sicher Nanopierce nicht 0,10€ wert!!!

Was hier alles passiert ist nur druck um bilig zu kaufen wer das jetzt nicht merkt werde er bald deutlich merken wenn die aktie über 1 € kostet!!

[skilos]

NanoPierce Technologie-verschieben vorwärts auf Joint Venture
NanoPierce Technologie-verschieben vorwärts auf Joint Venture



BW5609 NOV. 04.2004 8:23 PAZIFISCHES 11:23 ÖSTLICH



(BW) (CO-NANOPIERCE) (NPCT) (NPI.F) (NPI.H) NanoPierce Technologien MovesForward auf Joint Venture

Geschäft Editors/Biotech Verfasser

DENVER--(GESCHÄFT LEITUNG)--4. Nov. 2004--NanoPierce Technologien (OTCBB: NPCT) verkündete heute, daß eine 60 Tagesverlängerung die grantedby Xact Betriebsmittel gewesen- war, die in Zusammenhang mit dem LetterAgreement mit den Xact Betriebsmitteln international sind, zum einer Joint Ventures zu bilden, um ein biotech Hefebetaglukanprodukt zu produzieren, zu vermarkten und zu verkaufen, das als YBG-2000 bekannt ist.
NanoPierce, in übereinstimmung mit den Bezeichnungen der Buchstabe-Vereinbarung, ist, $1.5 Million zur Joint Venture für ein 50% beizutragen, das in der Joint Venture equityinterest ist. NanoPierce ordnet die $1.5Million Finanzierung durch die übung eines Teils seiner outstandingwarrants und von anderen Quellen. NanoPierce wurde zuerst 30days, zum der Finanzierung durchzuführen gegeben, aber wurde ein eine 60 Tagesverlängerung toDecember 31, 2004, um die Finanzierung durchzuführen bewilligt. NanoPierceadvanced zusätzlichen $75.000 zu den Xact Betriebsmitteln als Betrachtung für die Verlängerung.
Paul Metzinger, Präsident und Generaldirektor ofNanoPierce, sagte: "Wir haben einen Plan für die übung der theoutstanding Ermächtigungen entwickelt, die genügend sind, den Company´s Beitrag zum neuen Unternehmen zu finanzieren. Dieser Plan wird eingeführt während des extensionperiod."

Über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc.

NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., von Denver, Kolorado, USA, ist tradedon die Nasdaq Börse (OTCBB: NPCT) sowie auf den Frankfurtand Hamburg Austäuschen (OTC: NPI). Zusätzlich zu den 12 Patente itowns hat NanoPierce Technologien die Anwendungen, die schwebend sind, andere inpreparation und das verschiedene geistige Eigentum, das auf NanoPierceTechnologies´ NCS (TM) bezogen wird (NanoPierce Anschluß-System). Dieses advancedsystem ist entworfen, um bedeutende Verbesserung overconventional elektrische und mechanische Verbindung Methoden Forhighdichte Leiterplatten, Bestandteile, Einfaßungen, Stecker, das Halbleiterverpacken und die elektronischen Systeme zur Verfügung zu stellen.
Zu mehr Information über NanoPierce Technologies, Inc., pleasevisit seine Web site: www.nanopierce.com

Diese Ansage enthält das Vorwärts-Schauen von von Aussagen aboutNanoPierce Technologies, Inc., das Gefahren anduncertainties mit einbeziehen kann. Die wichtigen Faktoren in bezug auf sind das Company´s operationscould veranlassen Resultate, sich von denen in Vorwärts--lookingstatements und weiterem ausführlichem in den Archivierungen mit der Sicherheiten andExchange Kommission materiell zu unterscheiden, die an der sek Web site vorhanden ist (http://www.sec.gov).All, das Aussagen Vorwärts-schaut, basieren auf Informationen vorhandenem toNanoPierce Technologies, Inc. auf dem Datum hiervon und NanoPierceTechnologies, Inc., nimmt keine Verpflichtung an, solche Aussagen zu aktualisieren.

--30--DJM/dx* KONTAKT: NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. Paul H. Metzinger, Telefax 303-592-1010: 303-592-1054 [e-mail] oder Xact Resources International, Inc. Neal Bartoletta, Telefax 954-574-0568: 954-421-5734 SCHLÜSSELWORT: KOLORADO FLORIDA INDUSTRIE-SCHLÜSSELWORT: KLEINTEIL-BIOTECHNOLOGIE-MARKTVEREINBARUNG-QUELLE: NanoPierce Technologien, Inc.Copyright Geschäft Leitung 2004

(c), Geschäft Leitung 2004. Alle Wiedergabe, anders als als einzelne Benutzer `s Referenz, wird ohne vorherige schriftliche Erlaubnis verboten.

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[skilos]

1 € wir kommen !!!!!


1000 %

[libbmann]

Hallo skilos,
Diese Art von Beiträgen nervt !!!!!!!!!!!!

[Blacksidi]

ich bin jetzt auch mal eingestiegen, war schon einmal vor ca. 2 Jahren dabei. Ich denke wir haben einen Boden erreicht und mit rfid auch wieder genügend Phantasie, mal sehen.

blacksidi

[kaliho]

@skilos

auf was beruht dein optimismus? bitte erklaere.

oder ist das nur spekulation?

[skilos]

kaliho meine optimismus kommt weil hier es wird nach unten gedrukt um bilig zu kaufen!!

Die firma ist nicht insolvenz und die Aktie wird 9 monate als insolvenz gehandelt!!!

Chart technisch ist sehr interessant !!!

Die letzte anstieg war im oktober wenn das nur eine zock seine solte, hätte die Aktie mind. 100 % gelaufen ,sind bei diese aktie ganz schnell drin.Aber was ist passiert ?

Sind ca 6,5 mio aktien gekauft und seit denn imer wieder mit wenig stk die Aktie wieder bei 0,09 € !!

[skilos]

kaliho meine optimismus kommt weil hier es wird nach unten gedrukt um bilig zu kaufen!!

Die firma ist nicht insolvenz und die Aktie wird 9 monate als insolvenz gehandelt!!!

Chart technisch ist sehr interessant !!!

Die letzte anstieg war im oktober wenn das nur eine zock seine solte, hätte die Aktie mind. 100 % gelaufen ,sind bei diese aktie ganz schnell drin.Aber was ist passiert ?

Sind ca 6,5 mio aktien gekauft und seit denn imer wieder mit wenig stk die Aktie wieder bei 0,09 € !!

[skilos]

kaliho meine optimismus kommt weil hier es wird nach unten gedrukt um bilig zu kaufen!!

Die firma ist nicht insolvenz und die Aktie wird 9 monate als insolvenz gehandelt!!!

Chart technisch ist sehr interessant !!!

Die letzte anstieg war im oktober wenn das nur eine zock seine solte, hätte die Aktie mind. 100 % gelaufen ,sind bei diese aktie ganz schnell drin.Aber was ist passiert ?

Sind ca 6,5 mio aktien gekauft und seit denn imer wieder mit wenig stk die Aktie wieder bei 0,09 € !!

[kaliho]

hier sehen wir erstmals einen ertrag von einer lizenz:

1. The Company recognized $10,186 of other income, as a payment of a license fee during the three months ended September 30, 2004

tut sich hier etwas?

[skilos]

#3406

Die Firma erkannte $10.186 anderen Einkommens, als Zahlung einer Lizenzgebühr während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004

[Arivalucky]

Skilos ohh deine Ausdrucksweise tut schon weh aua
nix für ungut,Lucky

[cruisa]

@kaliho

woher hast Du das? Welche Quelle??? Aktuell oder Uralt??

[skilos]

In Nasdag Wieder + 4 % !!!!


15:40:25 0,1300 10000
15:39:50 0,1300 5000
15:39:32 0,1300 5000
15:37:20 0,1300 5000
15:37:17 0,1300 10000
15:37:15 0,1300 10000
15:32:36 0,1200 2500
15:32:35 0,1200 1000

[kaliho]

@cruisa

ganz aktuell vom 10Q gestern.


MD heute
Market Depth For Nanopierce Tech Inc Delayed: Nov 16 9:41 AM EST

MMD Bid Bid Size
NITE ↑ 0.125 50
SCHB 0.120 50
HILL ↑ 0.120 50
CRWN ↑ 0.115 50
GVRC 0.110 50
PUGS 0.110 50
BAMM ↓ 0.110 50
AGIS 0.105 50
FLCR 0.100 50
TDCM 0.100 50
EFGI 0.095 50
VERT 0.090 50
DOMS 0.080 50
FRAN 0.080 50
SACM 0.080 50
HDSN 0.080 50
BEST ↓ 0.080 50
JEFF 0.078 50
BMIC 0.070 50
BWNC 0.050 50
PERT 0.050 50
SBSH 0.050 50
SEAB 0.050 50
VFIN 0.050 50
VNDM 0.050 50
MMD Ask Ask Size
PUGS 0.140 50
TDCM 0.140 50
VERT 0.140 50
BAMM ↓ 0.140 50
SCHB ↑ 0.140 50
CRWN ↑ 0.140 50
JEFF 0.145 50
UCAP 0.145 50
EFGI 0.150 50
AGIS 0.160 50
NITE 0.160 50
SACM 0.180 50
HILL 0.180 50
BMIC 0.190 50
FRAN 0.200 50
GVRC 0.200 50
SEAB 0.200 50
HDSN 0.215 50
FLCR 0.220 50
BWNC 0.250 50
BEST ↓ 0.290 50
SBSH 0.300 50
VIEW 0.310 50
WDCO 0.330 50
QUIN 0.330 50
Price Qty Time
0.130 10000 09:40:24
0.130 5000 09:39:50
0.130 5000 09:39:31
0.130 10000 09:37:16
↑ 0.130 10000 09:37:14
↓ 0.120 2500 09:32:36
0.125 10000 11/15/04
0.125 6500 11/15/04
0.125 10000 11/15/04
0.125 10000 11/15/04
0.125 30000 11/15/04
0.125 28500 11/15/04
↑ 0.125 10000 11/15/04
0.122 10000 11/15/04
0.122 5000 11/15/04
↓ 0.122 5000 11/15/04
↑ 0.125 5000 11/15/04
↓ 0.120 1500 11/15/04
↑ 0.125 5000 11/15/04
0.120 1100 11/15/04
0.120 500 11/12/04
0.120 500 11/12/04

[skilos]

NASDAG


Geld 0,125

Brief 0,14

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

jetzt werden die Shortseller endlich davon gejagt!

Skilos hat Recht!

Nanopierce ist nicht insolvent!

Nanopierce expandiert!

Fonds sammeln hier die Aktien ein!

Siehe Beispiel "Calypte" bzw. "HIV", WKN 765254!
Meine Empfehlung in der vergangenen Woche!

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Nichts ist so stark wie eine Idee, deren Zeit gekommen ist!
(Viktor Hugo)

[kaliho]

schaut euch mal den chart von TZOO an. 75% der anteile sind/waren short. die shorts zahlen heftig!!

sowas kann passieren.

[MRASTA]

jetzt haben wir es endlich.

Fonds sammeln hier die Aktien ein!

Und wo, an der NASDAG.

Nun wissen wir ja alle was Sache ist.


Boah, das ist jetzt selbst mir zuviel, dass ist ja gruselig.

cu

[diegutefee]

Hallo Mrasta,

es tut mir leid, daß Du bei meinen bisherigen Empfehlungen
nicht eingekauft hast:

- Aastrom
- Stemcells
- Immune Response
- HIV (Calypte), WKN 765254)
- 8 x 8
- adsx
- Nanopierce

Wer keinen Weitblick bzw. Durchblick hat, sollte besser
schweigen!

An der Börse muß man ein gutes Feeling bzw. eine gute
Spürnase haben, sonst geht man unter.

Schönen Abend!

diegutefee

[skilos]

Hier ist einbahnstrasse nur KAUFENNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!

[Aufstieg2005]

...also...obwohl ich selbst noch mit `ner kleinen Restposition investiert bin, muss ich schon sagen (und damit MRASTA absolut zustimmen!), dass das Gepushe hier sowas von billig, nein peinlich ist, dass ich überlege, den Rest sofort auf den Markt zu werfen....

Das einzige, was mich davon im Moment noch abhält ist die Möglichkeit, dass es zu einem großen Teil doch fundamental interessierte Anleger sein könnten, die hier im Moment für steigende Kurse sorgen...

[libertyjean]

aus der Webseite von Jetsiadax (MOD) 16.11.04, 15:35

enpecete, der den ganzen Quartalsbericht auf Edgar online gelesen hat, kommt immerhin zu folgenden positiven Punkten:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Don`t know if you people read only the short version of the quarterly or the detailed version...

(can be found on edgar online, used to be free but you still can subscribe free for a try and read the detailed 10QSB here http://www.freeedgar.com/default.asp )


I personally didn`t expect much but at least I see some positive things :

1. The Company recognized $10,186 of other income, as a payment of a license fee during the three months ended September 30, 2004

=> this is the first time I see that we are paid for licensing (our tech ?)

What I couldn`t make out is from whom did it come ? Can someone help me and tell me if/when Scimaxx or EPT use our technology they have to pay for it or not ? Could this license fee be from one of them or from an (unknown) real client ? 2. Seems EPT isn`t doing bad after all, at least they increased their revenue from previous quarters AND MORE IMPORTANT, got NET INCOME


From 10Q :

Unaudited financial information of EPT as of September 30, 2004, and for the three months ended September 30, 2004 is as follows:

September 30, 2004
--------------------

Assets:
Current assets(1) $ 158,424
Equipment 274,659
--------------------
Total assets $ 433,083


Liabilities and members` equity:
Current liabilities(2) $ 168,786
Members` equity $ 264,297
--------------------
Total liabilities and members` equity $ 433,083


Three months ended
September 30, 2004
--------------------

Revenues $ 84,425
Expenses ( 76,352)
--------------------
Net income $ 8,073


3. For Scimaxx it`s on the contrary still a very bleak picture...


Unaudited financial information of Scimaxx Solutions as of September 30, 2004, for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and for the period from September 15, 2003 (inception) through September 30, 2003, is as follows:


Assets:
Current assets $ 10,332
Equipment $ 87,660
--------------------
Total assets $ 97,992

Liabilities and members` equity:
Current liabilities $ 56,405
Members`equity $ 41,587
--------------------
Total liabilities and members` equity $ 97,992


September 15, 2003
Three Months Ended through
September 30, 2004 September 30,2003
-------------------- ------------------

Revenues 5,773 -
Expenses ( 74,943) ( 3,794)
-------------------- ------------------

Net loss ( 69,170) ( 3,794)


Catch you longs later,
Geert.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hold NPCT and prosper

Jetsia





#1271 von teutosurfer (ID) 16.11.04, 16:42

Danke Jetsia für die Infos!

Sehr interessant, dass ET wohl jetzt innerhalb eines Quartals immerhin 84.425 USD Umsatz gemacht hat. - DAS ist echt bemerkenswert, wenn man das mal auf ein Jahr hochrechnet... Der Break-even ist jedenfalls wohl inzwischen erreicht. Jetzt müssen wir mal abwarten, wie sich das Ganze in den nächsten Quartalen weiterentwickelt.

Die Lizenzeinnahmen iHv 10.186 USD könnten ja vielleicht von einem "echten" Kunden kommen, welcher von der ExypnoTech, LLC geangelt wurde...? - Oder von dieser alten Exatron-Sache? - Vielleicht kann ja mal durch eine typische Nachfrage etwas mehr Licht in das (nichtmehrganzso)Dunkel gebracht werden?

Keep cool...

[skilos]

In NASDAQ OTC BBS +16 % auf tages hoch!!!

[microby]

diegutefee,

So war sein Spruch!

Nichts ist stärker wie eine Idee, deren Zeit gekommen ist!
(Viktor Hugo)

PS:
Du hast echt einen guten Riecher, besonders was stemcells und aastrom angeht.

[MRASTA]

@all

Die Sachlage ist doch völlig klar. Wenn Paule es nicht schafft den Kurs in Richtung der Optionen zu bewegen, dann dürfte er ein Problem haben. Der K(r)ampf scheint loszugehen. Ok, darauf kann man wetten oder auch nicht. Die Schallgrenze dürfte bei rund 0,20 $ liegen.

Wer den Q-Bericht genauer gelesen hat, weiß auch ganz genau wann hier was erfolgen wird bzw. müsste.

Außerdem sind im Oktober und November mal wieder 1,2 Mio Optionen für Cash über die Wupper gegangen und 314.000 $ zur Sicherung des Kredites im November. Also alles nach den Q-Zahlen !!!

Entscheidend ist doch wohl, wo man den Kurs sieht, wenn tatsächlich 61 Mio an Teilen dazukommen sollten. Dann sind es full immerhin 180 Mio Teile.

Und ich denke mal, dieser Absatz sagt wohl alles :

As a result of the Company`s limited revenues, lack of liquidity and going concern issues, the Company has revised its business plan to focus on licensing its technology to, or entering into joint ventures with companies that may utilize the technology rather than the development by the Company of its own products utilizing its technology.


Wenigstens scheint Exypnotech noch TAGS zu fertigen, bei Neuhaus sieht es wohl dagegen ziemlich düster aus.



@DieguteFee

#3416

Wer keinen Weitblick bzw. Durchblick hat, sollte besser
schweigen!

Nehme Deinen Rat mal an und verabschiede mich somit von diesem Thread. Wer behauptet, dass Fonds in einen OTC Wert einsteigen, ist hier genau richtig. Alle anderen (möglichen) Kommentare schenke ich mir mal.


Wie immer alles IMHO

Eigentlich schade, dass man hier nicht mehr sinnig diskutieren kann. Wünsche allen viel Glück, wie auch immer es ausgehen mag.

mrasta

[skilos]

Ich sage nur das hier denn letzte zeit mit system gesamelt ist.Was für mich auch eine große ausbruch kommen kann!!!

[libertyjean]

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/Info_Center.asp

danach unter "GET QUOTE" , NPCT eintippen,
dann rechts, Pfeil nach unten anclicken und "LEVEL II" wählen.

[libertyjean]

He He, vielleicht steckt solch eine Firma hinter den Machenschaften von Nanopierce

http://www.daswillichwissen.de/Clearstream

[skilos]

[B]Hier die ganze wahrheit warum jetzt Nanopierce steigt!!![/B]

Bilden Sie 10QSB für NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIEN Inc.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13-Nov-2004

Vierteljährlicher Report



EINZELTEIL 2. DISKUSSION UND ANALYSE DES MANAGEMENTS
Bestimmte Aussagen, die in dieser Form 10-QSB enthalten werden, enthalten "das Vorwärts-Schauen von von Aussagen" innerhalb der Bedeutung der privaten Sicherheiten Rechtsstreit-Verbesserung-Tat von 1995 und beziehen Gefahren und Ungewißheiten, die tatsächliche Resultate veranlassen konnten, sich von den Resultaten materiell zu unterscheiden, finanziell oder anders, oder andere Erwartungen, die in solchen Vorwärts-schauenden Aussagen beschrieben werden mit ein. Alle mögliche Vorwärts-schauende Aussage oder Aussagen sprechen nur ab dem Datum, auf dem solche Aussagen abgegeben wurden, und die Firma geht keine Verbindlichkeit ein, irgendeine Vorwärts-schauende Aussage zu aktualisieren, um Fälle oder Umstände nach dem Datum zu reflektieren, auf dem solche Aussagen abgegeben werden oder das Auftreten der unvorhergesehenen Fälle zu reflektieren. Folglich sollte das Vorwärts-Schauen von von Aussagen nicht als Vorhersage der tatsächlichen zukünftigen Resultate auf gebaut werden.

Der unabhängigen Report der Revisoren über die Finanzberichte der Firma am 30. Juni 2004 und für jedes der Jahre in der zweijährigen dann beendeten Periode, schließt einen "gehendes Interesse" erläuternden Punkt ein, der erheblichen Zweifel über die Fähigkeit der Firma, als gehendes Interesse fortzufahren beschreibt. Pläne des Managements hinsichtlich der Faktoren, die den erläuternden Punkt auffordern, werden unten und auch in Anmerkung 1 zu den vierteljährlichen Finanzberichten besprochen.

RESULTATE DER BETRIEBE

Am 1. April 2003 ordnete NCT Insolvenz mit den Gerichten von München, Deutschland ein. NCT wird als eingestellte Betriebe in angeschlossenen verkürzten Konzernabschluss dargestellt. Die Insolvenzarchivierung wurde zwecks des Einwilligens mit spezifischen deutschen zugelassenen Anforderungen gebildet. Im Juni 2004 führte NCT einen Plan der Selbst-verflüssigung von Vermögenswerten durch, und das deutsche Gericht löste erlaubterweise NCT auf. Infolgedessen hatte NCT kein Einkommen während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004, das mit einem Verlust von $1.920 während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003 verglichen wurde.

Die Firma erkannte $0 in den Einkommen von fortfahrenden Betrieben während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004, das bis $25.051 für die drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003 verglichen wurde. Die $25.051 in den Einkommen während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003 wurden vom Verkauf der Einlegearbeitbestandteile zu den Kunden durch EPT erzeugt.

Die Firma erkannte $10.186 anderen Einkommens, als Zahlung einer Lizenzgebühr während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004. Die Firma erkannte $1.936 im Interesse Einkommen während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004, das bis $3.418 während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003 verglichen wurde. Die Abnahme von $1.482 liegt an der Verringerung der Bargeldäquivalente, die verwendet werden, um Betriebe zu stützen.

Gesamtbetriebskosten von fortfahrenden Betrieben während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004 waren $213.843 verglichen bis $484.910 für die drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003. Die Abnahme von $271.067 ist einer Abnahme im allgemeinen und Verwaltungskosten hauptsächlich zuzuschreibend, wie unten beschrieben.


Drei Monate beendeten
30. September,
------------------
Betriebskosten 2004 2003 Abnahme
-------------------------- -------- -------- ----------
Allgemeine und administrative $213.843 $414.075 $ (200.232)
Forschung und Entwicklung $ 0 $ 46.655 $ (46.655)
Verkäufe und Marketing $ 0 $ 24.180 $ (24.180)




Die Abnahme von $200.232 im allgemeinen Verwaltungskosten ist einer Abnahme $67.020 an beratenen Gebühren, einer Abnahme $38.616 an den Tilgungunkosten und einer Abnahme $23.788 an Prüfungsgebühren hauptsächlich zuzuschreibend. Solche Abnahmen schließen die Abnahme Forschung und Entwicklung an den Unkosten und an den Verkäufen und an den Marketing-Unkosten ein, die ein Resultat des Aufgebens der Firma seiner PU Technologie im vierten Viertel beendetes 30. Juni 2004 waren.

Während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004, erkannte die Firma einen Reinverlust von $206.626 verglichen mit einem Reinverlust von $454.864 während

die drei Monate beendeten 30. September 2003. Die Abnahme von $248.238 ist der Abnahme von $271.067 an den Betriebskosten hauptsächlich zuzuschreibend, wie oben erklärt, kombiniert mit einer Abnahme von $25.051 an den Einkommen.

LIQUIDITÄT UND FINANZIELLER ZUSTAND

Während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2004, verwendete die Firma $147.408 in funktionierenden Tätigkeiten von fortfahrenden Betrieben und $23.282 wurden verwendet, um Verbindlichkeit gegenüber Banken zu zahlen. Die Firma hatte $847.718 von Bargeld und von Bargeldäquivalenten bei 30. September 2004, das verwendet wird, um Betriebe zu stützen. Während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003, verwendete die Firma $244.991 in funktionierenden Tätigkeiten von fortfahrenden Betrieben und $37.055 wurden verwendet, wenn man Tätigkeiten von fortfahrenden Betrieben investierte. Während der drei Monate beendet 30. September 2003, wurde die Firma $170.000 von der Finanzierung von von Tätigkeiten von fortfahrenden Betrieben zur Verfügung gestellt.

Am 30. September 2004 wenn alle bestehenden hervorragenden Ermächtigungen, die in einer Januar 2004 Privatplazierung geherausgeben wurden, ausgeübt wurden, wird die Firma angefordert, zusätzliche 61.350.000 Anteile von Stammaktien herauszugeben, und die Firma, auf einer völlig verdünnten Grundlage (einschließlich Reservierung von 11.919.120 Anteilen wie von dem Gericht im Finanzierung Vereinbarung Rechtsstreit gefordert), würde 179.360.030 Anteile Stammaktien herausgegeben und hervorragend haben .

Am 30. September 2004 wenn die Ermächtigungen zu den Investoren in der Privatplazierung herausgaben, die oben beschrieben wurde, sind ausgeübte alle, die Firma würden empfangen ungefähr zusätzlichen $12.525.000 . Jedoch kann keine Versicherung gegeben werden, daß irgendwelche Ermächtigungen ausgeübt werden. Wenn die Ermächtigungen ausgeübt werden, hat die Firma, daß sie die zusätzlichen Kapital benutzen kann, die von der übung dieser Ermächtigungen, um ein Einkommen zu erwerben empfangen werden, das Firma oder die Technologie zu erwerben erzeugt, die zur gegenwärtigen Technologie der Firma ergänzend ist entschieden, durch die Anordnung Joint Venture der Firma mit Scimaxx Lösungen, seinen Eigentumsanteil an ExypnoTech und alle anderen Lizenzvereinbarung- oder Joint Venture Vereinbarungen vermarktet zu werden, die die Firma zukünftig eintragen kann.

Resultierend aus den begrenzten Einkommen der Firma gibt Mangel an Liquidität und gehendes Interesse heraus, hat die Firma seinen Unternehmensplan verbessert, um auf das Genehmigen seiner Technologie zu zu konzentrieren oder das Teilnehmen an den Joint Ventures mit Firmen, die die Technologie anstatt die Entwicklung durch die Firma seiner eigenen Produkte verwenden können, die seine Technologie verwenden.

Die Firma erwartet, das Bargeld zu verwenden, das von einer Januar 2004 Privatplazierung empfangen wird, um fortzufahren, die Entwicklung und das Marketing seiner Technologie durch die Joint Venture Anordnung mit Scimaxx Lösungen auszuüben und seines Eigentumsanteils an EPT und fortzufahren, Verhältnisse zu den Firmen zu entwickeln, denen es Lizenzvereinbarungen oder Joint Venture Verträge mit schließt. Diesmal hat die Firma keine anderen Betriebe.

Am 1. Oktober 2004 schloß die Firma einen Buchstabe-Vertrag (die "Vereinbarung") mit Xact Resources International, Inc. ("Xact Betriebsmittel"). Die Vereinbarung ist, für die Entwicklung einer Joint Ventures zwischen dem Registrant und den Xact Betriebsmitteln zur Verfügung zu stellen. Der Zweck der Joint Ventures würde sein, YBG-2000, ein biotech Hefebetaglukanprodukt zu produzieren, zu vermarkten und zu verkaufen, das von Xact Resources entwickelt worden ist. YBG-2000 ist eine natürliche Betazufuhrergänzung immunes System des glukans, die von der Bäckerhefe verfeinert wird. Es wird verwendet, um antibiotische schnelle Wachstumzusätze zu ersetzen, die z.Z. von den Produzenten der Zufuhren für die Vieh-, Geflügel- und Garneleindustrien benutzt werden.
Gemäß der Vereinbarung rückte die Firma $75.000 zu den Xact Betriebsmitteln am 1. Oktober 2004 als temporäre Finanzierung vor. In der Rückkehr ist der Firma das ausschließliche Recht während einer 30 Tagesperiode, $1.500.000 anzuheben, um einen 50% Eigentumsanteil an der Joint Venture zu kaufen zur Verfügung gestellt worden. Am 3. November 2004 waren Xact Betriebsmittel damit einverstanden, die 30 Tagesperiode für zusätzliche 60 Tage zu verlängern. In der Rückkehr für die Verlängerung, das Firma vereinbarte Darlehen zusätzlichen $75.000 zu den Xact Betriebsmitteln. Solche Kapital sollen gegen den Erwerb des 50% Besitzes zugetroffen werden oder sind zu sein

zurückerstattet zur Firma, die Firma nicht, bringen das Kapital auf.

Am 5. November 2004 lieh die Firma $314.000 zu einem ohne Bezugaus dritter quelle in der Rückkehr für ein ungesichertes, 7% versprechende Anmerkung, passendes 30. Dezember 2004 aus . Die Kapital wurden in Zusammenhang mit den Bemühungen der Firma, die Finanzierung $1.5 Million für den Erwerb des die 50% Billigkeit Eigentumsanteils an der Joint Venture mit Xact Betriebsmitteln zu sichern ausgeliehen.

Die Firma fährt fort, zusätzliche Fusion- und Erwerbsgelegenheiten auszuwerten

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[skilos]

Hier kommt bald TOP MELDUNG !!!

[mfierke]

[skilos]

[skilos]

Bid: 13:37:10 0,112 20.000
Ask: 13:37:10 0,120 20.000

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[skilos]

noch kann jemand kaufen 20.000 für 0,12 €!!!

bald der ,,,,, ist in andere stelle 1,2 €

[DMKE]

jaja ... gähn ... und in ein paar tagen ist sie wieder bei 0,09 ...

[skilos]

Das werden wir sehenMKE

[skilos]

Jetzt verkauft auch keiner mehr!!!

Die stk sind ganz wenig geworden !!!

[DMKE]

genau, das sehen wir ja seit wochen.
hochpuschen auf 0,12 und abfallen auf 0,09 ..

in ein paar tagen gehts wieder abwärts ...

[skilos]

.......................

14:22:25 0,117 800
14:03:21 0,118 500
13:58:22 0,116 2.000
13:55:51 0,115 2.200
13:49:35 0,114 2.000
13:43:45 0,113 2.000
13:37:07 0,113 1.200
13:35:04 0,117 3.400
13:31:49 0,114 10.000
13:29:12 0,113 3.000

Zeit Kurs Umsatz
13:20:23 0,113 40.000
13:00:37 0,112 23.000
12:57:20 0,111 55.137
11:36:32 0,111 55.500
10:38:22 0,111 21.800
09:36:40 0,111 15.000
09:06:19 0,111 40.683

[skilos]

14:25:37 0,117 10.000 PROFIS
14:22:25 0,117 800
14:03:21 0,118 500
13:58:22 0,116 2.000
13:55:51 0,115 2.200
13:49:35 0,114 2.000
13:43:45 0,113 2.000
13:37:07 0,113 1.200
13:35:04 0,117 3.400
13:31:49 0,114 10.000

Zeit Kurs Umsatz
13:29:12 0,113 3.000
13:20:23 0,113 40.000
13:00:37 0,112 23.000
12:57:20 0,111 55.137
11:36:32 0,111 55.500
10:38:22 0,111 21.800
09:36:40 0,111 15.000
09:06:19 0,111 40.683

[skilos]

So kaufen hier die PROFIS !!!!
14:40:24 0,120 50.000
14:37:01 0,114 5.000
14:35:50 0,116 23.200
14:25:37 0,117 10.000
14:22:25 0,117 800
14:03:21 0,118 500
13:58:22 0,116 2.000
13:55:51 0,115 2.200
13:49:35 0,114 2.000
13:43:45 0,113 2.000

Zeit Kurs Umsatz
13:37:07 0,113 1.200
13:35:04 0,117 3.400
13:31:49 0,114 10.000
13:29:12 0,113 3.000
13:20:23 0,113 40.000
13:00:37 0,112 23.000
12:57:20 0,111 55.137
11:36:32 0,111 55.500
10:38:22 0,111 21.800
09:36:40 0,111 15.000
Weitere

[diegutefee]

Hallo microby,

Aastrom und Stemcells wurden von mir im August dieses
Jahres zum Kauf empfohlen, da lag der Kurs bei

- Aastrom bei ca. 0,65 $
- Stemcells bei ca. 1,4 $

Nach dem starken Anstieg kamen die Gewinnmitnahmen.

Die Konsolidierung dürfte jedoch bald abgeschlossen sein.

Danach sehe ich für beide Werte große Chancen!

Die Gründe hierfür werdet Ihr spätestens im nächsten Jahr
erfahren.

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee



P.S.:
Die von mir empfohlenen Werte befinden sich im
Zukunfts-Fond (d.h.: nur für spekulative Anleger mit
Mut zum Risiko!)

[skilos]

0.150 10000 10:24:52
0.150 1000 10:22:25
↑ 0.150 4000 10:21:48
0.148 20000 10:20:26
↓ 0.148 20000 10:06:40
0.150 2000 09:55:28
0.150 8000 09:44:20
↑ 0.150 6000 09:37:53
↓ 0.140 1900 09:33:22
↑ 0.150 20000 09:30:15
0.145 2800 11/16/04
↑ 0.145 2800 11/16/04
↓ 0.140 6000 11/16/04
0.145 1000 11/16/04
0.145 13000 11/16/04
0.145 13000 11/16/04
0.145 8000 11/16/04
↑ 0.145 500 11/16/04
↓ 0.140 7400 11/16/04
0.145 5000 11/16/04
0.145 4140 11/16/04
0.145 7500 11/16/04
↑ 0.145 4000 11/16/04
↓ 0.140 4000 11/16/04
0.145 20000 11/16/04

[skilos]

ASK in Nasdag steigt !!!


MMD Ask Ask Size
CRWN ↓ 0.150 50
BAMM 0.160 50
TDCM 0.160 50
SCHB 0.160 50
SACM 0.180 50
NITE ↑ 0.180 50
EFGI 0.185 50
AGIS 0.190 50
BMIC 0.190 50
PUGS 0.190 50
VERT ↑ 0.190 50
GVRC 0.200 50
SEAB 0.200 50
FRAN 0.200 50
HILL ↑ 0.200 50
HDSN 0.215 50
FLCR 0.220 50
UCAP 0.245 50
BWNC 0.250 50
JEFF ↑ 0.255 50
BEST ↓ 0.290 50
SBSH 0.300 50
VIEW 0.310 50
WDCO 0.330 50
QUIN 0.330 50

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[microby]

diegutefee,

STIMMT!

Genau das habe ich ja gemeint. Im August oder so ähnlich hast Du irgend wo mal geschrieben, dass da bald was geht. Vielleicht bei biph oder so. Jedenfalls habe ich dann die Scheine beobachtet und musste feststellen, dass mir, da nicht gekauft, eiiinige Prozente entgangen sind.

Und jetzt trifft man Dich bei Nanopierce wieder! Bisher hat es mir das mitlesen gefallen. (Bis dieser Kümmel kam!) Gut! Und jetzt kann man mal an anfangen die Scheine einzustecken, meinst Du? Na dann! Nächstes Jahr wird abgerechnet.

gruß microby

[microby]

diegutefee,

STIMMT!

Genau das habe ich ja gemeint. Im August oder so ähnlich hast Du irgend wo mal geschrieben, dass da bald was geht. Vielleicht bei biph oder so. Jedenfalls habe ich dann die Scheine beobachtet und musste feststellen, dass mir, da nicht gekauft, eiiinige Prozente entgangen sind.

Und jetzt trifft man Dich bei Nanopierce wieder! Bisher hat es mir das mitlesen gefallen. (Bis der Kümmel kam!) Gut! Und jetzt kann man mal an anfangen die Scheine einzustecken, meinst Du? Na dann! Nächstes Jahr wird abgerechnet.

gruß microby

[skilos]

Das diese aktiersicher steigt ist klar aber wie viel istnoch nicht klar!!!

Wer meine posting #3426 von skilos gut gelessen hat dann hat er das kurz fristige KZ bei diese aktie!!

Aber wenn einer firma aktien herauszugeben will, die jenige die aktien bekommen erwarten auch etwas davon .

Al so, 61.350.000 Anteile von Stammaktien herauszugeben!!!

einschließlich Reservierung von 11.919.120 Anteilen wie von dem Gericht im Finanzierung Vereinbarung Rechtsstreit gefordert!!!!

Bleiben über ca 49.450.000 aktien !!!!

die Firma würden empfangen ungefähr zusätzlichen $12.525.000



Das beduetet für mich die aktie hat eine wert von mind. 0,25

[Arivalucky]

bei 0,20 werde ich wieder verkaufen 2000 Euro langen mir

[skilos]

KAUFENNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[avsa]

ICH SAGE AUCH KAUFEN 25.12.2004 ist aktie0,35 werde ich mich wieder melden

[skilos]

125.000 stk zu 0,125 € wollen doch verkaufen oder nur druck zu machen abwarten !!!

Ich sage aber weiter kaufennnnnn !!!!!!!!

[skilos]

So wird in Nasdag gehandelt !!!


15:44:44 0,1400 1500
15:35:04 0,1500 10000
15:30:49 0,1500 40000
15:30:13 0,1500 1000
15:30:12 0,1400 100

[diegutefee]

Hallo microby,

folgende Werte sollte man haben:

- Aastrom, WKN 905286
- Stemcells, WKN 889118
- Curis, WKN 940909
- HIV (Calypte), WKN 765254
- Immune Response, WKN 765803
- ADSX, WKN A0BMY0
- Nanopierce

Herzliche Grüße

diegutefee

[skilos]

Nasdag die umsätze steigen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


16:44:30 0,1500 1100
16:44:27 0,1500 5000
16:44:20 0,1500 10000
16:40:39 0,1490 161000
16:40:38 0,1400 1250
16:01:18 0,1500 1000
15:44:44 0,1400 1500
15:35:04 0,1500 10000
15:30:49 0,1500 40000
15:30:13 0,1500 1000
15:30:12 0,1400 100

[skilos]

16:56:35 0,1450 200
16:54:37 0,1500 5000
16:52:42 0,1500 5000
16:44:30 0,1500 1100
16:44:27 0,1500 5000
16:44:20 0,1500 10000
16:40:39 0,1490 161000
16:40:38 0,1400 1250
16:01:18 0,1500 1000
15:44:44 0,1400 1500
15:35:04 0,1500 10000
15:30:49 0,1500 40000
15:30:13 0,1500 1000
15:30:12 0,1400 100

[Lugano]

Könnt ihr mir mal sagen, wo man die Umsätze nachschauen kann?
Danke!

[heikekarina]

ob ich hier auch mal wieder einsteige?

[skilos]

heikekarina steigt schnell ein sonst wird wirklich teuer!!!!!!

[heikekarina]

skilos

bist bei Sangui raus?

[kaliho]

0.150 71500 12:39:19
0.150 20000 12:27:03
0.150 5000 12:26:47
0.150 5000 12:07:18
↑ 0.150 5000 12:07:14
↓ 0.145 2500 12:06:53
0.150 15000 11:48:13
↑ 0.150 5000 11:03:55
0.145 5000 11:03:21
0.145 15000 11:03:16
↓ 0.145 200 10:56:35
0.150 5000 10:54:36
0.150 1100 10:44:29
0.150 5000 10:44:26
↑ 0.150 10000 10:44:19
↑ 0.149 161000 10:40:39
↓ 0.140 1250 10:40:38
0.150 1000 10:01:17
0.150 10000 09:35:03
0.150 40000 09:30:48
↑ 0.150 1000 09:30:09
↓ 0.140 100 09:30:08
0.149 2500 11/17/04
↑ 0.149 2500 11/17/04
0.147 85000 11/17/04

[skilos]

Die nächst kommt kauf panik hier !!!!:

[kaliho]

jetzt 0.155

463,750

[cruisa]

na also, geht doch

ein schöner definitiver Ausbruch Richtung 0,20DollarCent

seit Tagen gibt es nur noch nach Norden, wir Steigen mit garnicht mal so schlechtem Volumen, so wie im Moment!

sowas kann sich sehen lassen, jetzt noch eine schöne News dabei und ab gehts, dann wird es erstmal bei 0,20DollarCent die nächste Hürde geben.

Ich mag zwar die Art und Weise von skilos hier nicht wie er hier Pusht als gebe es nichts besseres, aber recht hat er! Los Leute Kaufen!

[skilos]

Ich sage nur das was ich sehe und mehr nicht für mich ist nur KAUFENNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Der große Ausbruch ist noch nicht da, wir werden hier sehen in eine tag mind 100 %

[cruisa]

MMD Bid Bid Size
SCHB ↑ 0.150 50
NITE ↑ 0.150 50
HILL ↑ 0.150 50
GNET ↑ 0.146 50
AGIS 0.130 50
TDCM 0.130 50
VERT ↑ 0.130 50
EFGI 0.125 50
FRAN 0.110 50
GVRC 0.110 50
PUGS 0.110 50
BAMM ↓ 0.110 50
CRWN 0.105 50
FLCR 0.100 50
UCAP 0.100 50
DOMS 0.080 50
SACM 0.080 50
HDSN 0.080 50
BEST ↓ 0.080 50
JEFF 0.078 50
BMIC 0.070 50
BWNC 0.050 50
PERT 0.050 50
SBSH 0.050 50
SEAB 0.050 50

MMD Ask Ask Size
CRWN ↑ 0.155 50
TDCM 0.160 50
BAMM ↓ 0.160 50
SCHB 0.160 50
NITE 0.160 50
SACM 0.180 50
EFGI 0.185 50
AGIS 0.190 50
PUGS 0.190 50
VERT 0.190 50
FRAN 0.200 50
GVRC 0.200 50
SEAB 0.200 50
HILL 0.200 50
HDSN 0.215 50
FLCR 0.220 50
BMIC ↑ 0.230 50
UCAP 0.245 50
BWNC 0.250 50
JEFF 0.255 50
BEST ↓ 0.290 50
SBSH 0.300 50
VIEW 0.310 50
WDCO 0.330 50
QUIN 0.330 50

wenn so weiter geht, fällt gleich die 0,16

[cruisa]

591.750...nicht schlecht das Volumen

[skilos]

seht wirklich sehr gut aus!!!!

[cruisa]

ich hoffe wir schliessen auf Höchstkurs, im mom wird mit einigen kleinen paketen gedrückt....nur eine frage der zeit

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

Nanopierce wird weiterhin steigen!

Siehe Chart!

Herzliche Grüße und gute Nacht!

diegutefee

[DMKE]

abwarten.. mittlerweile bin ich bei dem ding skeptisch ... die fällt nochmal ..

[Lugano]

Richtig! Gute Fee!

[ZoitiZock]

Na wer wird denn jetzt schon so pessimistisch sein sieht doch gar nicht so schlecht aus!

Chart ist echt ok, wenn jetzt amerika noch ein wenig anzieht gehts ab!!

[DMKE]

hatten wir doch mehrmals und dann sackt das ding ab !

[skilos]

Wer jetzt nichts merkt dann ist er selber schuld!!!

Die Aktie steigt seit 4 tage und die umsätze sind sehr gut!!

Gestern sind in Nasdag 800.000 stk gekauft !!!!

K A U F E N

[DMKE]

ja skilos, wir haben es verstanden. dein stündliches kaufen-posting ist ja auch nicht zu übersehen ...

[cruisa]

Mal sehen was der Tag heute bringt. Könnte sehr interessant werden. Gestern zwar nicht auf Höchstkurs geschlossen, und es wurde versucht mit ein paar kleinen Stückzahlen den Kurs bis kurz vor Ende nach unten zu drücken, was aber glücklicherweise nicht gelang. Seit Juli haben wir erstmals die 0,14DollarCent über meherere Tage durchbrochen. Wichtig ist nun nicht wieder auf 0,10DC wieder zurückzufallen

was wir jetzt brauchen ist eine News

[Arivalucky]

Schönes WE euch allen
Grüße Lucky

[diegutefee]

Hallo Freunde,

ich sehe - trotz kleiner Rücksetzer - weiterhin steigende
Kurse!

Die "Bullen" sind jetzt dran!

Die "Bären" dürfen nicht mehr zurückkehren!

Herzliche Grüße und schönes Wochenende!

diegutefee

[traumapfel]

Liebe Fee,

schade, sieht nicht gut aus heute. Deinen Optimismus möchte ich haben ...

[skilos]

Seht sehr gut aus !!!!

Der kurs wird gedrukt ,das kanns du sehen mit wie viel stk der kurs gedrukt wird !!

Ich sage nichts verkaufen !!!

Nur KAUFENNNNN !!!!!

[Lugano]

Trotz des starken Anstieges dieser Woche, fällt die Aktie in den USA nicht so stark. Ich finde sie hält sich ganz gut in diesem schlechten Marktumfeld.

Schönes Wochenende!

[cruisa]

meiner Meinung nach darf der SK heute nicht unter 0,14DollarCent liegen, sollte es doch passieren kann es wieder weiter runter gehen und wir haben wieder das hoch-runter Spielchen. Wie gesagt es kann muss aber nicht.

Warten wir den Abend ab....

[kaliho]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934


November 19, 2004
_________________________________________________
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
_____________________________________________________
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada 33-19598-D 84-0992908
_______________________________________________________________________
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission File (IRS Employer
of incorporation) Number) Identification Number)


370 17th Street, Suite 3640
Denver, Colorado 80202
________________________________________________________
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


[phone]
______________________________________________________
(Registrant`s telephone number, including area code)


Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions:

[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
CFR 230.425)
[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[_] Pre- commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




SECTION 3 - SECURITIES AND TRADING MARKETS

ITEM 3.03 MATERIAL MODIFICATION TO RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

Warrant Exercise Price Reduction

In January 2004, NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (the ``Registrant``) sold
20,000,000 units to a limited number of accredited investors in a private
placement transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Each unit
consists of, among other things, a warrant to purchase two shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share (the ``$0.25 Warrants``). The $0.25
Warrants will expire on January 20, 2009, unless exercised earlier.

On November 16, 2004, the Registrant re-issued $0.25 Warrants exercisable for
39,500,000 shares of registered common stock with a reduced exercise price. The
Registrant reduced the exercise price of these $0.25 Warrants from $0.25 per
share to $0.10 per share. No other terms of the $0.25 Warrants were modified or
changed as a result of the reduction in the exercise price.




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Date: November 19, 2004 NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.




/s/ Paul H. Metzinger
-------------------------------------
Paul H. Metzinger, President &
Chief Executive Officer

[Lugano]

@ cruisa

Die 0,14DollarCent haben gehalten.

[skilos]

SICHERHEITEN UND AUSTAUSCH-KOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORMS 8-K

GEGENWÄRTIGER REPORT

Gemäß Abschnitt 13 oder 15 (d) von
Börsengesetz von 1934


19. November 2004
_________________________________________________
Datum des Reports (Datum des frühesten Falls berichtet)


NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
_____________________________________________________
(Genauer Name von Registrant, wie in seiner Charter spezifiziert)


Nevada 33-19598-D 84-0992908
_______________________________________________________________________
(Zustand oder andere Jurisdiktion (Kommission Akte (IRS Arbeitgeber
Gesellschaftsgründung) von der Zahl-) Kennummer)


370 17. Straße, Suite 3640
Denver, Kolorado 80202
________________________________________________________
(Adresse der leitenden hauptsächlichstellungen) (Reißverschluss-Code)


[phone]
______________________________________________________
(Telefonnummer Registrants, einschließlich Ortsnetzkennzahl)


Überprüfen Sie den passenden Kasten unten, wenn die Archivierung der Form 8-K zu beabsichtigt wird
erfüllen Sie gleichzeitig die Archivierung Verpflichtung vom registrant Unter irgendwie von
folgende Bestimmungen:

[_] Schriftliche Kommunikationen gemäß Richtlinie 425 unter der Sicherheiten Tat (17
CFR 230.425)
[_] Anbieten des Materials gemäß Richtlinie 14a-12 unter der Austausch-Tat (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
[_] Vor-Anfang Kommunikationen gemäß Richtlinie 14d-2 (b) darunter
die Austausch-Tat (17 CFR 240.14d-2 (b))
[_] Vor Anfang Kommunikationen gemäß Richtlinie 13e-4 (c) darunter
die Austausch-Tat (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))




ABSCHNITT 3 - SICHERHEITEN UND HANDELNDE MÄRKTE

MATERIAL-ÄNDERUNG DES EINZELTEIL-3.03 RECHTS DER SICHERHEIT HALTER.

Ermächtigung übung Preis-Verkleinerung

Im Januar 2004 NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. (das `` Registrant ``) verkauft
20.000.000 Maßeinheiten zu einer begrenzten Anzahl von beglaubigten Investoren in einem privatem
Plazierung Verhandlung ausgenommen von der Ausrichtung unter Abschnitt 4 (2) von
Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 und Regelung D darunter verkündet. Jede Maßeinheit
besteht unter anderem aus einer Ermächtigung zum Kaufen zwei Anteile unseres Common
Vorrat zu einem übung Preis von $0.25 pro Anteil (das `` $0.25 gewährleistet ``). Die $0.25
Ermächtigungen laufen am 20. Januar 2009 ab, es sei denn früh ausgeübt.

Am 16. November 2004 gab das Registrant $0.25 Ermächtigungen neu heraus, die für exercisable sind
39.500.000 Anteile eingetragene Stammaktien mit einem verringerten übung Preis.
Registrant verringerte den übung Preis dieser $0.25 Ermächtigungen von $0.25 pro
Anteil bis $0.10 pro Anteil. Keine anderen Bezeichnungen der $0.25 Ermächtigungen wurden geändert oder
geändert resultierend aus der Verringerung des übung Preises.




UNTERSCHRIFTEN

Gemäß den Anforderungen des Börsengesetzes von 1934,
Registrant hat ordnungsgemäß diesen Report veranlaßt, durch für ihre Zwecke unterzeichnet zu werden
unterzeichnetes hereunto ordnungsgemäß autorisiert worden.


Datum: 19. November 2004 NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

[MRASTA]

#3366 und #3422

muss ich doch noch mal.

Ok. ein 8 er aber trotzdem Treffer, versenkt.

cu

[libertyjean]

He He, noch ein bißchen und wir erreichen die 200 Millionen Aktien für NPCT, nicht schlecht !
Da werden wieder einige von "Dilution" reden wollen.


Subject: RE: how many shares are out now?
From enpecete
PostID 367311 On Friday, November 19, 2004 (EST) at 4:02:53 PM
Response To: madams1 PostID 367294

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From the 10QSB (11/2003 - period ending 09/2003)

As of November 13, 2003 there were 66,023,969 shares of the registrant`s sole class of common shares outstanding



From the 10KSB (09/2004 - period ending 6/2004)

As of the close of trading on September 27, 2004, there were 90,059,033 shares outstanding, 87,996,765 of which were held by non-affiliates

On January 12, 2004, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with Charleston Capital Corp. (now known as Clayton Dunning & Company, Inc.) in connection with a proposed sale of our securities to a number of ``accredited investors`` (as defined in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended), in a private placement transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933. In connection with this agreement, on January 20, 2004, the Company sold 20,000,000 units for a total of $2,000,000 to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement. Each unit consists of (i) one share of the Company`s common stock,
(ii) a warrant to purchase one share of the Company`s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share (``$.10 warrants``) and (iii) and a warrant to purchase two shares of the Company`s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. All these warrants expire on January 20, 2009 unless exercised earlier. As a result of the sale, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its common stock, 20,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 per share and 40,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.25 per share



From the 10QSB (11/2004 - period ending 09/2004)

As of November 11, 2004 there were 91,259,033 shares of the registrant`s sole class of common shares outstanding

In October 2004, warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock were exercised for net cash proceeds of $94,000 (net of $6,000 of costs) in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of common stock.

In November 2004, warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock were exercised for net cash proceeds of $18,800 (net of $1,200 of costs) in exchange for 200,000 shares of common stock

As of September 30, 2004, if all existing outstanding warrants issued in a January 2004 private placement were exercised, the Company will be required to issue an additional 61,350,000 shares of common stock, and the Company, on a fully diluted basis (including the reservation of 11,919,120 shares as required by the court in the Financing Agreement Litigation), would have 179,360,030 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

As of September 30, 2004, if the warrants issued to investors in the private placement described above are all exercised, the Company would receive approximately an additional $12,525,000

[cruisa]

@MRASTA

was hast Du versenkt? Erklärung bitte


Bid0,14
Ask0,15

es ist nicht unter die magische 0,14 gegangen, sehr gut. Mal schauen wie es am Montag weitergeht, bin optimistisch das wir langsam aber sicher weiter Richtung Norden laufen werden

[skilos]

Er er, noch ein bißchen und wir erreichen Würfel 200 Millionen Aktien für NPCT, nicht schlecht!
Da werden wieder einige von "Verdünnung" reden wollen.


Thema: BETR.: wieviele Anteile sind heraus jetzt?
Vom enpecete
PostID 367311 am Freitag, dem 19. November 2004 (EST) bei 4:02: 53 P.M.
Antwort zu: madams1 PostID 367294

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vom 10QSB (11/2003 - Periode, die 09/2003 beendet)

Am 13. November 2003 gab es 66.023.969 Anteile der alleinigen Kategorie der registrants der allgemeinen ausgegebenen Aktien



Vom 10KSB (09/2004 - Periode, die 6/2004 beendet)

Ab dem Ende von am 27. September 2004 handeln, gab es 90.059.033 ausgegebene Aktien, von denen 87.996.765 von den Nichtteilnehmern gehalten wurden

Am 12. Januar 2004 schloß die Firma einen Plazierung Mittelvertrag mit Charleston Capital Corp. (jetzt bekannt als Clayton Dunning & Company, Inc.) in Zusammenhang mit einem vorgeschlagenen Verkauf unserer Aktien zu einer Zahl des `` beglaubigten Investoren `` (wie in der Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 definiert, wie geändert), in einer Privatplazierung Verhandlung, die von der Ausrichtung gemäß Abschnitt 4 (2) ausgenommen ist der Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 und ordnet 506 der Regelung an D, die unter der Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 verkündet wurde. In Zusammenhang mit dieser Vereinbarung am 20. Januar 2004 verkaufte die Firma 20.000.000 Maßeinheiten für eine Gesamtmenge von $2.000.000 an eine begrenzte Anzahl von beglaubigten Investoren in einer Privatplazierung Verhandlung, die von der Ausrichtung unter Abschnitt 4 (2) ausgenommen ist der Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 und der Regelung D, die unter der Sicherheiten Tat von 1933 gemäß einer Sicherheiten Kaufvereinbarung verkündet wurde. Jede Maßeinheit besteht (i) aus einem Anteil der Stammaktien der Firma,
(ii) eine Ermächtigung zum Kaufen einen Anteil der Stammaktien der Firma zu einem übung Preis von $0.10 pro Anteil (`` $.10 gewährleistet ``) und (iii) und eine Ermächtigung, um zwei Anteile der Stammaktien der Firma zu einem übung Preis von $0.25 zu kaufen pro Anteil. Alle diese Ermächtigungen laufen ab, am 20. Januar 2009 es sei denn früh ausgeübt. Resultierend aus dem Verkauf gab die Firma 20.000.000 Anteile seiner Stammaktien, 20.000.000 Ermächtigungen mit einem übung Preis von $0.10 pro Anteil und 40.000.000 Ermächtigungen mit einem übung Preis von $0.25 pro Anteil heraus



Vom 10QSB (11/2004 - Periode, die 09/2004 beendet)

Am 11. November 2004 gab es 91.259.033 Anteile der alleinigen Kategorie der registrants der allgemeinen ausgegebenen Aktien

Im Oktober 2004 wurden die Ermächtigungen zum Kaufen 1.000.000 Anteile Stammaktien für netto Kasse Erträge von $94.000 (Netz von $6.000 von Kosten) gegen 1.000.000 Anteile Stammaktien ausgeübt.

Im November 2004 wurden die Ermächtigungen zum Kaufen 200.000 Anteile Stammaktien für netto Kasse Erträge von $18.800 (Netz von $1.200 von Kosten) gegen 200.000 Anteile Stammaktien ausgeübt

Am 30. September 2004 wenn alle bestehenden hervorragenden Ermächtigungen, die in einer Januar 2004 Privatplazierung geherausgeben wurden, ausgeübt wurden, wird die Firma angefordert, zusätzliche 61.350.000 Anteile von Stammaktien herauszugeben, und die Firma, auf einer völlig verdünnten Grundlage (einschließlich Reservierung von 11.919.120 Anteilen wie von dem Gericht im Finanzierung Vereinbarung Rechtsstreit gefordert), würde 179.360.030 Anteile Stammaktien herausgegeben und hervorragend haben.

Am 30. September 2004 wenn die Ermächtigungen zu den Investoren in der Privatplazierung herausgaben, die oben beschrieben wurde, sind ausgeübte alle, die Firma würden empfangen ungefähr zusätzlichen $12.525.000

[kaliho]

@diegutefee

mit jetzt 170 millionen.... hmmm da bin ich etwas enttaeuscht. ist das nicht etwas viel?
was ist denn Deine Preis erwartung mit all den anteilen?

MfG und schoenes wochenende

[ROAR]

@ Kaliho
Ich glaube, man braucht gar nicht diegutefee zu fragen.
Wenn sie glaubt, LANGFRISTIG = bis 3 Monaten, dann Gute Nacht ! Da hat sie wohl gar keine große Ahnung von der Börse,nur vielleicht ein bißchen Glück mit ein paar Aktien, wie wir alle schon mal auch irgendwann haben.