DER NÄCHSTE ZOCK!!!!!!1000% KURSPOTENTIAL MIT DIESER AKTIE - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[MR.ZOCKY]

Helkon Media 608050

Umsätze ziehen heute an

Aktie heute erstmalig angesprungen




Schaut euch Brokat und Popnet an
Popnet schon über 1500% gemacht

[pam5mue]

...hab ich schon erwähnt das ich hier 17000 verstaubte rumliegen hab....

[greyhound_cc]

PASSST MAL LIEBER AUF CPU AUF....

[Zwerg Nase]

wenn das stimmt mit den Gerüchten ( Banken verzichten auf Fordrungen ; Retung der Gesellschaft ) .... ohoh

[ZOCKER2003]

May 15, 2003

BOOTS & COOTS INTERNATIONAL WELL CONTROL INC (WEL)
Quarterly Report (SEC form 10-Q)
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT`S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides save harbor provisions for forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based on projections, assumptions and estimates, not historical information. Some statements in this Form 10 - Q are forward-looking and use words like "may," "may not," "believes," "do not believe," "expects," "do not expect," "do not anticipate," and other similar expressions. We may also provide oral or written forward-looking information on other materials we release to the public. Forward-looking information involves risks and uncertainties and reflects our best judgment based on current information. Our results of operations can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. In addition, other factors may affect the accuracy of our forward-looking information. As a result, no forward-looking information can be guaranteed. Actual events and results of operations may vary materially.


While it is not possible to identify all factors, we face many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements including those contained in this 10-Q, our press releases and our Forms 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K filed with to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not assume any responsibility to publicly update any of our forward-looking statements regardless of whether factors change as a result of new information, future events or for any other reason.


OVERVIEW


On January 1, 2001, the Company redefined the segments in which it operates as a result of the discontinued operations of ITS and Baylor business operations and further redefined the segments during 2002, as a result of the decision to discontinue its Abasco and Special Services business operations. The current segments are Prevention and Response. Intercompany transfers between segments were not material. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. For purposes of this presentation, general and corporate expenses have been allocated between segments on a pro rata basis based on revenue. ITS, Baylor, Abasco and Special Services are presented as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements and are therefore excluded from the segment information for all periods presented.

The Prevention segment consists of "non-event" services that are designed to reduce the number and severity of critical well events to oil and gas operators. The scope of these services include training, contingency planning, well plan reviews, services associated with the Company`s Safeguard programs and services in conjunction with the WELLSURE(R) risk management program. All of these services are designed to significantly reduce the risk of a well blowout or other critical response event.

The Response segment consists of personnel and equipment services provided during an emergency response such as a critical well event or a hazardous material response. These services are designed to minimize response time and damage while maximizing safety. Response revenues typically provide high gross profit margins.


AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING


The American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") by letter dated March 15, 2002, required the Company to submit a reasonable plan to regain compliance with AMEX`s continued listing standards by December 31, 2002. On April 15, 2002, the Company submitted a plan that included interim milestones that the Company would be required to meet to remain listed. AMEX subsequently notified the Company that its plan had been accepted; however, on June 28, 2002, the Company submitted an amendment to the plan to take into account, among other things, certain restructuring initiatives that the Company had undertaken. The Company has not been advised by AMEX whether or not it approved the June 28, 2002, amended plan. Since submitting the amended plan, the Company has been actively pursuing alternatives that would allow it to fulfill the objectives outline in the amended plan. However, the Company does not, at this time, have any prospects or commitments for new financing or the restructuring of its existing obligations that, if successfully completed, would result in compliance with AMEX`s continued listing standards.

AMEX may institute immediate delisting proceedings as a consequence of the Company`s failure to achieve compliance its continued listing standards. AMEX recently requested that the Company submit a letter requesting that the AMEX grant the company an additional two quarters to attain compliance as a consequence of recent business improvements. The Company is preparing such a request.

AMEX continued listing standards require that listed companies maintain stockholders` equity of $2,000,000 or more if the Company has sustained operating losses from continuing operations or net losses in two of its three most recent fiscal years or stockholders equity of $4,000,000 or more if it has sustained operating losses from continuing operations or net losses in three of its four most recent fiscal years. Further, the AMEX will normally consider delisting companies that have sustained losses from continuing operations or net losses in their five most recent fiscal years or that have sustained losses that are so substantial in relation to their operations or financial resources, or whose financial condition has become so impaired, that it appears questionable, in the opinion of AMEX, as to whether the company will be able to continue operations or meet its obligations as they mature.



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES


In response to the SEC`s Release No. 33-8040, "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure about Critical Accounting Policies," the Company has identified the accounting principles which it believes are most critical to the reported financial status by considering accounting policies that involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessment. The Company identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and income taxes.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized on the Company`s service contracts primarily on the basis of contractual day rates as the work is completed. On a small number of turnkey contracts, revenue may be recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based upon costs incurred to date and estimated total contract costs. Revenue and cost from equipment sales is recognized upon customer acceptance and contract completion.

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined.

The Company recognizes revenues under the WELLSURE(R) program as follows: (a) initial deposits for pre-event type services are recognized ratably over the life of the contract period, typically twelve months (b) revenues and billings for pre-event type services provided are recognized when the insurance carrier has billed the operator and the revenues become determinable and (c) revenues and billings for contracting and event services are recognized based upon predetermined day rates of the Company and sub-contracted work as incurred.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - The Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company assesses its credit risk and provides an allowance for doubtful accounts for any accounts which it deems doubtful of collection.

Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the SFAS No. 109 "Accounting For Income Taxes," which requires recognition of deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company`s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and available tax carry forwards.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the other financial information included in this report and contained in the Company`s periodic reports previously filed with the SEC.


Information concerning operations in different business segments for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 is presented below. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods to conform to the current presentation.


THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
------------------------
2002 2003
----------- -----------
REVENUES
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,729,000 $ 8,659,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,281,000 2,272,000
----------- -----------
$4,010,000 $10,931,000
----------- -----------
COST OF SALES
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 416,000 $ 3,308,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953,000 655,000
----------- -----------
$1,369,000 $ 3,963,000
----------- -----------
OPERATING EXPENSES(1)
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 806,000 $ 1,516,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820,000 343,000
----------- -----------
$1,626,000 $ 1,859,000
----------- -----------
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES (2)
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 293,000 $ 663,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386,000 174,000
----------- -----------
$ 679,000 $ 837,000
----------- -----------
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION (3)
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 109,000 $ 194,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177,000 51,000
----------- -----------
$ 286,000 $ 245,000
----------- -----------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 105,000 $ 2,978,000
Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . (55,000) 1,049,000
----------- -----------
$ 50,000 $ 4,027,000
----------- -----------

(1) Operating expenses have been allocated pro rata among segments based upon relative revenues. (2) Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses have been allocated pro rata among segments based upon relative revenues. (3) Corporate depreciation and amortization expenses have been allocated pro rata among segments based upon relative revenues.



COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 WITH THE THREE MONTHS ENDED

MARCH 31, 2002


Revenues

Prevention revenues were $8,659,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $1,729,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, representing an increase of $6,930,000 (400.8%) in the current year. Increases during the first quarter of 2003 were the result of proceeds from certain equipment sales.

Response revenues were $2,272,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $2,281,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of $9,000 (0.4%). During the first quarter of 2003 the company acted as lead contractor in Iraq and billed for firefighters and engineers to be in Kuwait or Iraq as needed. The first quarter of 2002 included a large well control event also.

Cost of Sales

Prevention cost of sales were $3,308,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $416,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of $2,892,000 (695.1%) in the current quarter. The increase was a result of additional labor and travel costs and costs of equipment sales related to the previously mentioned increase in revenue.

Response cost of sales were $655,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $953,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of $298,000 (31.3%) in the current year. The decrease in cost of sales is due to the use of the Company`s own workforce for the work in Kuwait and Iraq in 2003. The 2002 period include a less profitable large well control event that required higher than usual third party costs.


Operating Expenses

Consolidated operating expenses were $1,859,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $1,626,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of $233,000 (14.3%) in the current quarter. The increase was a result of additional labor, insurance and travel costs related to the previously mentioned increase in revenue. As previously footnoted on the segmented financial table, corporate selling, general and administrative expenses have been allocated pro rata among the segments on the basis of relative revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses were $837,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to $679,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of $158,000 (23%) from the prior year. These increases are due to the higher costs related to working in a war zone and to costs related to the Company`s restructuring initiatives. As previously footnoted on the segmented financial table, corporate selling, general and administrative expenses have been allocated pro rata among the segments on the basis of relative revenue.

Depreciation and Amortization

Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses decreased primarily as a result of the reduction in the depreciable asset base between 2002 and 2003. As previously footnoted on the segmented financial table, depreciation and amortization expenses on related corporate assets have been allocated pro rata among the segments on the basis of relative revenue.

Interest Expense and Other, Including Finance Costs

The increase in interest and other expenses of $325,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, as compared to the prior year period is primarily a result of increasing the face value of the Prudential debt at December 31, 2002, per the loan agreement and was partially offset by the interest expense incurred in connection with the pledging of receivables in the prior year and financing fees related to the Prudential waiver discussed below as compared to nominal interest expense in the prior year period.

Income Tax Expense

Income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 are a result of taxable income in the Company`s foreign operations.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES/INDUSTRY CONDITIONS



LIQUIDITY


At March 31, 2003, the Company had a working capital deficit of $13,500,000 and a total stockholders` deficit of $10,100,000. In addition, the Company is currently in default under its loan agreements with The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Specialty Finance Fund 1, LLC, and, as a consequence, these lenders and the participants in the Specialty Finance credit facility may accelerate the maturity of their obligations at any time. As of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not received notice from any lender of acceleration nor any demand for repayment. All of these obligations have been classified as current liabilities at March 31, 2003 in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. See Note F for further discussion of the Company`s debt. The Company also had significant past due vendor payables at March 31, 2003.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company`s short term liquidity improved as a consequence of certain asset sales, which resulted in net proceeds (after replacement costs) to the Company of approximately $2 million. A portion of these proceeds were used to pay $700,000 plus interest owing under the Company`s credit facility with Checkpoint Business, Inc. (See Note F for further discussion). The Company also applied a portion of the proceeds to pay $400,000 to settle the Calicutt lawsuit (See Note G for further discussion) and to reduce payables owing to certain of the Company`s significant vendors.

The Company generates its revenues from prevention services and emergency response activities. Response activities are generally associated with a specific emergency or "event" whereas prevention activities are generally "non-event" related services. Event related services typically produce higher


operating margins for the Company, but the frequency of occurrence varies widely and is inherently unpredictable. Non-event services typically have lower operating margins, but the volume and availability of work is more predictable. Historically the Company has relied on event driven revenues as the primary focus of its operating activity, but more recently the Company`s strategy has been to achieve greater balance between event and non-event service activities. While the Company has successfully improved this balance, event related services are still the major source of revenues and operating income for the Company.

The majority of the Company`s event related revenues are derived from well control events (i.e., blowouts) in the oil and gas industry. Demand for the Company`s well control services is impacted by the number and size of drilling and work over projects, which fluctuate as changes in oil and gas prices affect exploration and production activities, forecasts and budgets. The Company`s reliance on event driven revenues in general, and well control events in particular, impairs the Company`s ability to generate predictable operating cash flows.

During the first quarter of 2003, there was a significant increase in demand for the Company`s services and equipment, particularly internationally and specifically in the Middle East in connection with the war in Iraq. Such increase in activity resulted in the Company generating income from operations of $4,027,000 for the first quarter of 2003. While these developments have positively impacted the Company`s near-term liquidity, there can be no assurance that the cash flows generated from such activities will be sufficient to meet the Company`s near-term liquidity needs. In addition, while the Company has recently been able to pay its critical vendors for current services and materials, there remain significant overdue payables which the Company has been unable to satisfy.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. However, the uncertainties surrounding the sufficiency and timing of its future cash flows, the current defaults of certain debt agreements with its lenders, and the lack of firm commitments for additional capital raises substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Credit Facilities/Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2002, the Company was not in compliance with the ratio tests for the trailing twelve-month period under its loan agreement with the Prudential Insurance Company of America and the Company did not receive a waiver from Prudential for this period. Under the Prudential loan agreement, failure to comply with the ratio tests is an event of default and the note holder may, at its option, by notice in writing to the Company, declare all of the Notes to be immediately due and payable together with interest accrued thereon. Accordingly, the Company has classified this obligation as a current liability on its balance sheet. As of May 14, 2003, the Company has not received a written notice of default from Prudential and the Company is discussing with Prudential to secure a Forbearance agreement.

On June 18, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with KBK Financial, Inc. ("KBK") pursuant to which the Company pledged certain of its accounts receivable to KBK for a cash advance against the pledged receivables. The agreement allows the Company to, from time to time, pledge additional accounts receivable to KBK in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5,000,000. The Company paid certain fees to KBK for the facility and will pay additional fees of one percent per annum on the unused portion of the facility and a termination fee of up to two percent of the maximum amount of the facility. The facility provides the Company an initial advance of eighty-five percent of the gross amount of each receivable pledged to KBK. Upon collection of the receivable, the Company receives an additional residual payment net of fixed and variable financing charges. The Company`s obligations for representations and warranties regarding the accounts receivable pledged to KBK are secured by a first lien on certain other accounts receivable of the Company. The facility also provides for financial reporting and other covenants similar to those in favor of the senior lender of the Company. The Company had $109,000 and $0 of its accounts receivable pledged to KBK that remained uncollected as of December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003, respectively and, accordingly, these amounts have been classified as restricted asset, on the balance sheet as of both dates. Included in the December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 balance sheets is $38,000 and $0, respectively of restricted assets related to discontinued operations. In addition, as of December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003 the Company`s cash balances include $9,000 and $0, respectively representing accounts receivable that had been collected by KBK and were in-transit to the Company but which were potentially subject to being held as collateral by KBK pending collection of uncollected pledged accounts receivable.

On April 9, 2002, the Company entered into a loan participation agreement under which it borrowed an additional $750,000 under its existing Senior Secured Loan Facility with Specialty Finance Fund I, LLC. The effective interest rate


of the participation is 11% after taking into account rate adjustment fees. The Company also paid 3% of the borrowed amount in origination fees, paid closing expenses and issued 100,000 shares of common stock to the participation lender at closing. The participation had an initial maturity of 90 days, which was extended for an additional 90 days at the Company`s option. The Company issued an additional 100,000 shares of common stock to the participation lender to extend the maturity date. On October 9, 2002, the loan extension period matured. As of May 14, 2003, none of the loan participation has been repaid nor has the Company received formal demand for payment from the loan participant. However, in the loan documentation the Company has waived the notices which might otherwise be required by law and, as a consequence, the loan participants have the current ability to post the collateral securing their notes for foreclosure.

On May 2, 2002, the Company borrowed $250,000 under the Senior Secured Loan Facility upon similar terms, except that the Company issued 33,334 shares of common stock to the participating lenders at closing and issued an additional 33,334 shares of common stock to extend the maturity of those notes for an additional 90 days. On October 25, 2002, the loan extension period matured. As of May 14, 2003, none of the loan participations have been repaid nor has the Company received formal demand for payment from the loan participants. However, in the loan documentation the Company has waived the notices which might otherwise be required by law and, as a consequence, the loan participants have the current ability to post the collateral securing their notes for foreclosure.

On July 5, 2002, the Company entered into a loan participation agreement under which it borrowed an additional $100,000 under its existing Senior Secured Loan Facility. The effective interest rate of the participation is 25% after taking into account rate adjustment fees. The Company also paid 3% of the borrowed amount in origination fees, paid closing expenses and issued 130,000 shares of common stock to the participation lender at closing. The participation had a maturity of 90 days. On September 28, 2002, the loan matured. As of May 14, 2003, none of the loan participation has been repaid nor has the Company received formal demand for payment from the loan participant. However, in the loan documentation the Company has waived the notices which might otherwise be required by law and, as a consequence, the loan participants have the current ability to post the collateral securing their notes for foreclosure.

On July 8, 2002, the Company entered into a loan participation agreement under which it borrowed an additional $200,000 under its existing Senior Secured Loan Facility. The effective interest rate of the participation is 16% after taking into account rate adjustment fees. The Company also paid 4% of the borrowed amount in origination fees, paid closing expenses and issued 150,000 shares of common stock to the participation lender at closing. The participation had a maturity of 90 days. On October 1, 2002, the loan matured. As of May 14, 2003, none of the loan participation has been repaid nor has the Company received formal demand for payment from the loan participant. However, in the loan documentation the Company has waived the notices which might otherwise be required by law and, as a consequence, the loan participants have the current ability to post the collateral securing their notes for foreclosure.

On December 4, 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Checkpoint Business, Inc. ("Checkpoint") providing for short term working capital up to $1,000,000. The effective interest rate of under the loan agreement was 15% per annum. Checkpoint collateral included substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the stock of the Company`s Venezuelan subsidiary. As of December 31, 2002 and March 28, 2003, the Company had borrowed $500,000 and an additional $200,000, respectively, under this facility.

On March 28, 2003, the Company paid in full the principal balance of $700,000 and interest outstanding under its loan agreement with Checkpoint. On May 7, 2003, the Company settled Checkpoint`s option to purchase its Venezuelan subsidiary and terminated Checkpoint`s exclusivity rights. This settlement consisted of $300,000 of cash and $100,000 in notes maturing in six months.



FUTURE COMMITMENTS TO BE PAID IN THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION 2003 2004 2005 2006 THEREAFTER
----------------------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -----------

Long term debt and notes payable including short term
debt (1) . . . . . . . . . . . $10,221,000 - - - -
----------------------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -----------
Future minimum lease
payments. . . . . . . . . . . $ 581,000 $640,000 $421,000 $208,000 $ 208,000
----------------------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -----------

Total commitments . . . . . . $10,802,000 $640,000 $421,000 $208,000 $ 208,000 - - -
(1) Accrued interest totaling $4,485,000 is included in the Company`s 12% Senior Subordinated Note at March 31, 2003, due to the accounting for a troubled debt restructuring during 2000, but has been excluded from the above presentation. Accrued interest calculated through December 31, 2002, will be deferred for payment until December 30, 2005. Payments on accrued interest after December 31, 2002, began on March 31, 2003, and will continue quarterly until December 30, 2005.

[MR.ZOCKY]

Schon 270000 umgesetzt
Soviel wie lange nicht mehr
Wieviel Aktien haben die denn?

[Luitschi]

ich sage nur: DAUSEND !!!!

[MR.ZOCKY]

Laut Chart heute Ausbruch

[Zwerg Nase]

total ausgetrocknet diese helkon !

[Zwerg Nase]

Frankfurt 308518 0 0.045 0.049

[MR.ZOCKY]

Helkon Media +128%
Umsatz Frankfurt 375000
Aktienanzahl 11,3 Mio
Mich würde interessieren wie hoch der Freefloat ist
Könnte auch ein 1000%ler werden wie Popnet

[diddelmax]

0,06

[MR.ZOCKY]

+174% in der Spitze

Nächste Woche 20 cents

[kyron7htx]

Stürzt schon wieder ab.
Nur Hochgezocke, nichts Fundamentales hinter. Leminge den Letzten verarschen Sie.

[diddelmax]

# 14
und was steckte hinter roesch ???

[kyron7htx]

#15 Guck Dir doch den Kurs heute an!

[diddelmax]

aber erst mal um über 800% hochgezogen

[kyron7htx]

#17

JA, JA aber aber ohne Fundamentales.
Du weißt das doch, geb es doch zu.
Du möchtest noch ein paar Dumme reinlocken, die Dir den Mist abnehmen.

[Zwerg Nase]

helkon ist heute ausgebrochen mit ziel 0,25€. jetzt bei 0,04 kann man nachkaufen !

[THECANADIEN]

 #756 von THECANADIEN   16.05.03 15:23:12  Beitrag Nr.: 9.473.541   9473541
 Dieses Posting:  versenden | melden | drucken | Antwort schreiben



Fällt negativ auf in den letzten Tagen!



Schon bedenklich,was so an Werten ohne Hintergrund zur Zeit gehandelt wird.Es fehlt hier häufig an Handelsvolumen,einer fundamentalen Story sowie auch einer techn. Analyse!Vielfach eine unseriöse Art irgendwelche Werte nach oben zu treiben...-hier stehen in Kürze massive Verluste/Rückschläge für viele Anleger an.

Aber es heißt ja weiterhin,Gier frisst Hirn!

Soweit ein kurzer Denkansatz/Einwurf am Rande!


MfG


THE CANADIEN

[Zwerg Nase]

Frankfurt 655383 0 0.050 0.052 0

[Zwerg Nase]

ausbruch gelungen ! es geht heute weiter !

[Zwerg Nase]

kursziel für diese woche 0,10 cents ! nimmt mich beim wort!

[Loserin]

Was nimmst Du denn

[Zwerg Nase]

bitte vorher genau informieren canni, umsatz ist da und story auch !

[Zwerg Nase]

ich nehme mein geld und schmeiss es in helkon rein und dannach hol ich mir meine 200% ab. kannst du mir folgen, loserin?

[Loserin]

@Zwerg

wohin soll ich Dir folgen

[Zwerg Nase]

in die disco?

[diddelmax]

ich denke das nach rösch,bintec,biodata,achterbahn usw
jetzt bald artstor, pixelnet oder helkon an der reihe sind.
da werden jeden tag neue pennystocks hochgezock.