Apple - unaufhaltsamer Aufstieg - wie lange noch? (Seite 679)
eröffnet am 18.01.05 13:14:58 von
neuester Beitrag 14.06.24 08:32:37 von
neuester Beitrag 14.06.24 08:32:37 von
Beiträge: 49.546
ID: 944.638
ID: 944.638
Aufrufe heute: 3
Gesamt: 4.626.491
Gesamt: 4.626.491
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US0378331005 · WKN: 865985 · Symbol: AAPL
212,49
USD
-0,82 %
-1,75 USD
Letzter Kurs 15.06.24 Nasdaq
Neuigkeiten
| Titel |
|---|
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
| Apple mit Schwierigkeiten – Ist der Ausbruch in Gefahr?Anzeige |
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
15.06.24 · Markus Weingran  |
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
Warren Buffett: Der alte Mann und das "Mehr"Werte aus der Branche Hardware
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 2,9800 | +12,03 | |
| 0,5890 | +11,34 | |
| 19,676 | +10,73 | |
| 0,8100 | +9,76 | |
| 44,08 | +4,28 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 3,5100 | -5,90 | |
| 2,0400 | -7,69 | |
| 0,5380 | -11,80 | |
| 0,7260 | -14,79 | |
| 6,6700 | -15,89 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 52.347.528 von auriga am 04.05.16 23:20:32Die Analyse der Dt Bank ist aber schon älter: 11.01.2016. Wobei ich erstaunt bemerken muss, dass sie zur Zeit im Trend liegt. Ansonsten ist die Dt Bank für mich eher Kontraindikator. Vertrauenswürdig und Dt Bank sind in meinem Weltbild nun mal ein klassischer Kontrast. Und das seit Zeiten des Neuen Marktes um 2000 rum.
Bezüglich Sherri, Die Wachstumsdynamik bei den Smartphoneverkäufen schwäche sich signifikant ab, auch wegen dem China-Geschäft und Margendruck. Die Aktie sei auf ihrem gegenwärtigen Kursniveau aber fair bewertet./edh/fat
FRANKFURT (dpa-AFX Analyser) - Die Deutsche Bank hat das Kursziel für Apple von 125 auf 105 US-Dollar gesenkt, die Einstufung aber auf "Hold" belassen. In Erwartung einer sinkenden iPhone-Nachfrage habe sie ihre Umsatz- und Gewinnprognosen für den Elektronikkonzern im Jahr 2016 reduziert, schrieb Analystin Sherri Scribner in einer Studie vom Montag. Die Wachstumsdynamik bei den Smartphoneverkäufen schwäche sich signifikant ab, auch wegen dem China-Geschäft und Margendruck. Die Aktie sei auf ihrem gegenwärtigen Kursniveau aber fair bewertet./edh/fat
http://www.finanzen.net/analyse/Apple_Hold-Deutsche_Bank_AG_…
FRANKFURT (dpa-AFX Analyser) - Die Deutsche Bank hat das Kursziel für Apple von 125 auf 105 US-Dollar gesenkt, die Einstufung aber auf "Hold" belassen. In Erwartung einer sinkenden iPhone-Nachfrage habe sie ihre Umsatz- und Gewinnprognosen für den Elektronikkonzern im Jahr 2016 reduziert, schrieb Analystin Sherri Scribner in einer Studie vom Montag. Die Wachstumsdynamik bei den Smartphoneverkäufen schwäche sich signifikant ab, auch wegen dem China-Geschäft und Margendruck. Die Aktie sei auf ihrem gegenwärtigen Kursniveau aber fair bewertet./edh/fat
http://www.finanzen.net/analyse/Apple_Hold-Deutsche_Bank_AG_…
Kursziele Apple Finanzinstitute: http://www.finanzen.net/Kursziele/Apple
Keine Ahnung? LOL! UBS ist circa 8 USD unter Analysten Durchschnitt. Der Schnitt ist entscheidend buddy und gleicht die unterschiedlichen Interessen der Institute aus. Du verstehen? Aber lass uns in der Diskussion bleiben. Milunovich ist auch eng an Cook und durchaus einer der Teilnehmer am CC jeweils. Die Schweizer National Bank hat zuletzt auch Apple aufgestockt in einem der sensationellsten Gesamtportfolios die es überhaupt auf der Welt gibt finde ich, nur BTW. Wer sich länger mit Apple befasst kann leicht erkennen, dass die Kursziele der Institute etwa in den letzten 1 ½ Jahren jeweils gut angenähert wurden und unterschiedliche Interessen gut ausgeglichen wurden. Bestes Beispiel dafür sind die USD 135 von Gene, die seinerzeit annäherend postwendend erreicht wurden. Alles nachzulesen weiter vorne buddy, OK? Gerade bei Apple konnten wir den Gang der Aktie im Lauf der Ziele bestätigen. Surprise!
Ich will dir etwas entgegenkommen damit, dass diese Kursziele auf ein Jahr ausgelegt sind und nicht auf Morgen; gleich! Das heißt eine Investition hat natürlich Zeit in der aktuellen Situation auch des Gesamtmarktes. Dubios mitnichten buddy! Nicht alle Analysten sind long buddy. Take a look a Sherry Scribner from Deutsche Bank for example. Schau dir überhaupt mal die Liste der Finanz-Elite an. Bezüglich Bild, Computer Bild ist eines meiner Lieblingshefte neben CT und sehr gut, sehr erfrischend. Schöne Feiertage.
http://www.finanzen.net/Kursziele/Apple
PS. Bitte erst Hausaufgaben machen und dann tönen, OK?
@m2012-12
Apple Inc.’s new spaceship-like headquarters in Cupertino, California is starting to come together, according to the latest drone footage taken from the construction site.
Drone photographer Duncan Sinfield shot Apple’s AAPL, +0.05% Campus 2 this week and posted the footage to YouTube. The footage shows the finishing touches on the fitness center, nearly-finished parking structures and progress under way at Apple’s new R&D facility.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/drone-footage-shows-progres…
Apple Inc.’s new spaceship-like headquarters in Cupertino, California is starting to come together, according to the latest drone footage taken from the construction site.
Drone photographer Duncan Sinfield shot Apple’s AAPL, +0.05% Campus 2 this week and posted the footage to YouTube. The footage shows the finishing touches on the fitness center, nearly-finished parking structures and progress under way at Apple’s new R&D facility.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/drone-footage-shows-progres…
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 52.346.952 von auriga am 04.05.16 21:49:34
Die beste Verkaufsempfehlung ist für mich, wenn jeder Analyst long ist oder in der Bild-Zeitung steht "Kauft Aktien" - den dann ist die Party vorbei ;-) Schöne Feiertage
dubiose Kursziele, Analysten und die Bild
Wer solche Kursziele rausgibt hat wohl entweder keine Ahnung oder eigene Interessen. Die haben vermutlich eine eigene Apple Position im Handelsbestand oder wollen Kleinanleger anlocken denen Sie die Hosen ausziehen ;-). Generell kann ich nur von Kaufempfehlungen jeglicher Analysten abraten -Als ob die den Privatanlegern fremder Depotbanken zu Gewinnen verhelfen wollen...Wers glaubt .... Sollte jeder mal selbst hinterfragen was solche Analysen eigentlich wert sind.Die beste Verkaufsempfehlung ist für mich, wenn jeder Analyst long ist oder in der Bild-Zeitung steht "Kauft Aktien" - den dann ist die Party vorbei ;-) Schöne Feiertage
Trading Spotlight
UBS-Studie von Milunovich (price target USD 120)(Buy) fasst aktuelle Aspekte sehr gut zusammen. Auch für einen reread die Tage geeignet IMO. Schönen Feiertag.
UBS’s Steve Milunovich today offers up evidence from the firm’s “Evidence Lab” that there’s hope for a rise in Apple’s (AAPL) iPhone sales when it produces the next model of the device, presumably an “iPhone 7.”
Milunovich, who has a Buy rating on the shares, and a $120 price target, writes that his survey of 6,336 smartphone users in the U.S., U.K., Japan, Germany, and Mainland China, conducted online in March, found some improvement in sentiment for Apple’s wares.
Milunovich’s report is actually contained in two notes.
In the Apple-specific note, he writes of an improvement in the upgrade “cycle” for the iPhone versus what many see as a lengthening of the time between when people buy a new iPhone, writing “in our fall survey we should have taken more seriously the two negatives: demand for the 6s was weaker than for the 6 and upgrade cycles slightly lengthened.”
The latest data “finds a reversal,” he writes. “interest in the iPhone 7 is better than for the 6s though not as strong as for the 6 and upgrade cycles appear shorter in the US and China though not in other countries.”
In the companion report on the survey itself, the intent of consumers has actually improved from that survey back in the fall, at least in the U.S. and China:
Encouragingly – having seen medium-term demand in our past two surveys slow, we are now seeing improving demand for smart-phones in both the US and China – the two largest markets for smart-phones globally. This stands in stark contrast to the evidence on the ground including Apple results where China and the US were down in phone volume terms as well as the work we have done around market saturation. The question now is whether the survey proves an aberration on a general worsening trend or whether – as has been the case previously – it is a good forward indicator of medium term demand beyond a single quarter’s guidance and checks. In the US the survey showed that 52% of respondents intend to upgrade their smart-phone in the next 12-months, up from 46% in our prior survey six months ago. For China the results were 69%, up from 63% respectively. Again this is contrary to procurement estimates from Chinese smartphone OEMs which have so far only marginally improved year-to-date. This could come from continuing softness in their exports segments, notably other emerging markets.
For Apple, in particular, he sees encouraging signs for an iPhone 7 in both the U.S. and China:
Positively for Apple, the UBS Evidence Lab survey indicates that we may witness see a somewhat stronger upgrade cycle for the iPhone 7 with consumer showing more likelihood of purchasing than they did with the iPhone 6S. Of our survey respondents, 47% cited that they were holding off purchasing a new Apple product until the next one is available showing that we believe there is some pent up demand for Apple devices and this may explain the weaker one quarter forward guidance […] We also see a lack of pull-in of procurement for current iPhones into Q1 ’16 – indicating some caution, still, on H2 ’16 volumes.
On the negative side, Milunovich found that the Chinese brands that have been beating up on Apple of late — Huawei, Oppo, and Xiaomi — are increasingly more likely to be viewed by people who own them as “aspirational” than are products from Apple — even though Apple still scores higher when people are asked if it makes “quality products”:
Chinese vendors Xiaomi, Huawei and OPPO are seen as aspirational brands by more of their owners than Apple or Samsung. Apple continues to score poorly for offering value for money. Samsung has now overtaken Apple in terms of owners believing they produce high quality products. Samsung brand is clearly one of the best regarded by consumers today. Nokia still maintains brand trust surprisingly given it no longer makes devices. It will potentially be important as the company is able to reuse its brand on smartphones from H2 ’16 and given its recent purchase of wearables company, Withings, for €170m.
Milunovich’s refutes the view of some of late that the smartphone is becoming like personal computers, something that Sterne Agee CRT’s Rob Cihra suggested yesterday.
That’s not the case, in Milunovich’s view:
Q: Is the smartphone market the next PC market (will the smart-phone market fall in ’16?) No. We believe it is possible that the market will decline in volumes in certain years but the UBS Evidence Lab survey data suggests stabilization in the medium-term for the smart-phone market, with marginally improved replacement rates expected in US and China. Our view remains that the smart- phone market could decline if the upgrade cycle slows but our central assumption is that emerging market demand should deliver modest unit growth and an aspirational upgrade market.
While developed markets like the U.S. are pretty “saturated,” India and other countries represent smartphone opportunity, writes Milunovich, echoing comments from Apple CEO Tim Cook to Jim Cramer on Tuesday:
We believe incremental penetration gains going forward are likely to be driven by emerging markets and mature markets determined by the pace of upgrade rates. While we believe we have reached high levels of market penetration we still see room for unit growth as further penetration occurs. Interestingly though, in many markets with the introduction of leasing plans and new growth in connected devices outside of smart-phones, the number of connections made by operators are increasingly pointed to new areas (such as cars etc). This is in evidence in the US market as shown below.
Milunovich offers an infographic for those “penetration” rates (click on the image to see it larger):
There were also healthy signs for Samsung Electronics (005930KS), which unveiled its latest flagship phone, the “Galaxy S7,” at the end of February, and which seems to be fairing very well, writing, “For Samsung, we also found stronger demand for the Galaxy S7, along with Samsung’s retention rate improving including in China. We believe the smart- phone market will remain challenging for tier-2 OEMs including LG and HTC.
http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2016/05/04/apple-su…
May 4, 2016, 2:44 P.M. ET
Apple: Survey Says iPhone Demand to Recover, But Huawei, Oppo More ‘Aspirational,’ Says UBS
UBS’s Steve Milunovich today offers up evidence from the firm’s “Evidence Lab” that there’s hope for a rise in Apple’s (AAPL) iPhone sales when it produces the next model of the device, presumably an “iPhone 7.”
Milunovich, who has a Buy rating on the shares, and a $120 price target, writes that his survey of 6,336 smartphone users in the U.S., U.K., Japan, Germany, and Mainland China, conducted online in March, found some improvement in sentiment for Apple’s wares.
Milunovich’s report is actually contained in two notes.
In the Apple-specific note, he writes of an improvement in the upgrade “cycle” for the iPhone versus what many see as a lengthening of the time between when people buy a new iPhone, writing “in our fall survey we should have taken more seriously the two negatives: demand for the 6s was weaker than for the 6 and upgrade cycles slightly lengthened.”
The latest data “finds a reversal,” he writes. “interest in the iPhone 7 is better than for the 6s though not as strong as for the 6 and upgrade cycles appear shorter in the US and China though not in other countries.”
In the companion report on the survey itself, the intent of consumers has actually improved from that survey back in the fall, at least in the U.S. and China:
Encouragingly – having seen medium-term demand in our past two surveys slow, we are now seeing improving demand for smart-phones in both the US and China – the two largest markets for smart-phones globally. This stands in stark contrast to the evidence on the ground including Apple results where China and the US were down in phone volume terms as well as the work we have done around market saturation. The question now is whether the survey proves an aberration on a general worsening trend or whether – as has been the case previously – it is a good forward indicator of medium term demand beyond a single quarter’s guidance and checks. In the US the survey showed that 52% of respondents intend to upgrade their smart-phone in the next 12-months, up from 46% in our prior survey six months ago. For China the results were 69%, up from 63% respectively. Again this is contrary to procurement estimates from Chinese smartphone OEMs which have so far only marginally improved year-to-date. This could come from continuing softness in their exports segments, notably other emerging markets.
For Apple, in particular, he sees encouraging signs for an iPhone 7 in both the U.S. and China:
Positively for Apple, the UBS Evidence Lab survey indicates that we may witness see a somewhat stronger upgrade cycle for the iPhone 7 with consumer showing more likelihood of purchasing than they did with the iPhone 6S. Of our survey respondents, 47% cited that they were holding off purchasing a new Apple product until the next one is available showing that we believe there is some pent up demand for Apple devices and this may explain the weaker one quarter forward guidance […] We also see a lack of pull-in of procurement for current iPhones into Q1 ’16 – indicating some caution, still, on H2 ’16 volumes.
On the negative side, Milunovich found that the Chinese brands that have been beating up on Apple of late — Huawei, Oppo, and Xiaomi — are increasingly more likely to be viewed by people who own them as “aspirational” than are products from Apple — even though Apple still scores higher when people are asked if it makes “quality products”:
Chinese vendors Xiaomi, Huawei and OPPO are seen as aspirational brands by more of their owners than Apple or Samsung. Apple continues to score poorly for offering value for money. Samsung has now overtaken Apple in terms of owners believing they produce high quality products. Samsung brand is clearly one of the best regarded by consumers today. Nokia still maintains brand trust surprisingly given it no longer makes devices. It will potentially be important as the company is able to reuse its brand on smartphones from H2 ’16 and given its recent purchase of wearables company, Withings, for €170m.
Milunovich’s refutes the view of some of late that the smartphone is becoming like personal computers, something that Sterne Agee CRT’s Rob Cihra suggested yesterday.
That’s not the case, in Milunovich’s view:
Q: Is the smartphone market the next PC market (will the smart-phone market fall in ’16?) No. We believe it is possible that the market will decline in volumes in certain years but the UBS Evidence Lab survey data suggests stabilization in the medium-term for the smart-phone market, with marginally improved replacement rates expected in US and China. Our view remains that the smart- phone market could decline if the upgrade cycle slows but our central assumption is that emerging market demand should deliver modest unit growth and an aspirational upgrade market.
While developed markets like the U.S. are pretty “saturated,” India and other countries represent smartphone opportunity, writes Milunovich, echoing comments from Apple CEO Tim Cook to Jim Cramer on Tuesday:
We believe incremental penetration gains going forward are likely to be driven by emerging markets and mature markets determined by the pace of upgrade rates. While we believe we have reached high levels of market penetration we still see room for unit growth as further penetration occurs. Interestingly though, in many markets with the introduction of leasing plans and new growth in connected devices outside of smart-phones, the number of connections made by operators are increasingly pointed to new areas (such as cars etc). This is in evidence in the US market as shown below.
Milunovich offers an infographic for those “penetration” rates (click on the image to see it larger):
There were also healthy signs for Samsung Electronics (005930KS), which unveiled its latest flagship phone, the “Galaxy S7,” at the end of February, and which seems to be fairing very well, writing, “For Samsung, we also found stronger demand for the Galaxy S7, along with Samsung’s retention rate improving including in China. We believe the smart- phone market will remain challenging for tier-2 OEMs including LG and HTC.
http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2016/05/04/apple-su…
May 4, 2016, 2:44 P.M. ET
Apple: Survey Says iPhone Demand to Recover, But Huawei, Oppo More ‘Aspirational,’ Says UBS
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Die negative Tendenz der Vortage setzt sich an den US-Börsen am Mittwoch fort. Konjunktursorgen, die die US-Börsen am Dienstag auf den niedrigsten Stand seit drei Wochen gedrückt haben, lasten weiter auf der Stimmung. Dies obwohl die Konjunkturdaten des Tages uneinheitlich waren und keineswegs nur schlechte Botschaften enthielten. Vereinzelt sprechen Akteure auch von einer Verschnaufpause nach der kräftigen Erholung der US-Börsen von den Februar-Tiefs.
https://www.boerse-stuttgart.de/de/boersenportal/nachrichten…
Mit Cook Anschluss an Nasdaq 5 Tage gewonnen und die Drei-Monats-Bilanz, die vor den numbers noch pari war auf 6.5% zu Nasdaq angenähert. Man kann sagen jetzt nach der Cramer Sendung wieder mit Nasdaq zusammen am Laufen. Der Abwärtslauf von Apple wurde am Montag erst einmal gestoppt.
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/aapl?mod=MW_story…
https://www.boerse-stuttgart.de/de/boersenportal/nachrichten…
Mit Cook Anschluss an Nasdaq 5 Tage gewonnen und die Drei-Monats-Bilanz, die vor den numbers noch pari war auf 6.5% zu Nasdaq angenähert. Man kann sagen jetzt nach der Cramer Sendung wieder mit Nasdaq zusammen am Laufen. Der Abwärtslauf von Apple wurde am Montag erst einmal gestoppt.
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/aapl?mod=MW_story…
Ich würde jedem empfehlen die Korrektur abzuwarten. In 4 Monaten evtl. wieder long wenn die Verkaufszahlen am Boden Sind. Ich freue mich auf die nächsten Quartalszahlen, weil es dann nochmal richtig kracht. Bis dato Short:-)
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 52.341.517 von IngChris am 04.05.16 11:24:15Morgen 90USD :-)
USD 95.- 
http://www.nasdaq.com/de/symbol/aapl/premarket" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://www.nasdaq.com/de/symbol/aapl/premarket
http://www.nasdaq.com/de/symbol/aapl/premarket" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://www.nasdaq.com/de/symbol/aapl/premarket
Durchsuchen
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Apple |
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Amazon |
15.06.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Apple |
15.06.24 · wO Chartvergleich · ABB |
14.06.24 · dpa-AFX · Adobe |
14.06.24 · dpa-AFX · Adobe |
14.06.24 · dpa-AFX · Apple |
| Zeit | Titel |
|---|---|
| 21.05.24 | |
| 11.02.24 | |
| 18.01.24 | |
| 27.11.23 | |
| 05.11.23 | |
| 22.08.23 | |
| 04.08.23 | |
| 02.07.23 |