BP ein Kauf (Seite 602)
eröffnet am 21.01.06 17:43:43 von
neuester Beitrag 26.04.24 08:59:02 von
neuester Beitrag 26.04.24 08:59:02 von
Beiträge: 10.240
ID: 1.034.409
ID: 1.034.409
Aufrufe heute: 5
Gesamt: 975.927
Gesamt: 975.927
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: GB0007980591 · WKN: 850517 · Symbol: BPE5
6,1570
EUR
+0,26 %
+0,0160 EUR
Letzter Kurs 26.04.24 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
24.04.24 · dpa-AFX Analysen |
18.04.24 · dpa-AFX Analysen |
18.04.24 · dpa-AFX Analysen |
17.04.24 · inv3st.de Anzeige |
Werte aus der Branche Öl/Gas
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,240 | +26,53 | |
| 2,090 | +20,81 | |
| 2,890 | +17,48 | |
| 7,3400 | +15,77 | |
| 9,6400 | +13,95 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 6,7200 | -8,82 | |
| 325,00 | -9,97 | |
| 0,9400 | -10,48 | |
| 4,3100 | -18,98 | |
| 9,3500 | -28,02 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
FeedbackZitat von Milesstyles: Morgen,
stellvertretend für BP an Anadarko: "Die Firma dankt"
Also ein bißchen Wasser würde ich schon in den Wein gießen. Man muß ja sehen, dass die anderen Partner, d. h. die Japaner und jetzt Anadarko, sich mit diesen Zahlungen an BP bzw. an den Entschädigungsfonds freikaufen.
BP trägt jetzt das gesamte Risiko und kann keinen Regreß bei den Teilhabern nehmen, wenn die Gesamtkosten höher ausfallen. Insofern waren die Teilhaber ein gewisser Hedge gegen das Risiko des amerikanischen Schadensersatzrechts.
Das führt unmittelbar zur nächsten Schlußfolgerung. Möglicherweise war es Anadarko einfach Leid, dieses Thema mit sich herumschleppen zu müssen. Man war stiller Teilhaber und wollte mit den Betrieb nichts zu tun haben, fand sich dann aber als amerikanisches unternehmen auf der Anklagebank wieder.
Möglicherweise hat Anadarko aber auch die Einschätzung des Risikos der Klagen mittleriweile nach oben revidiert, d. h. während man ursprünglich davon ausging, dass dieses Spezialgesetz das allgemeine Deliktsrecht, und damit die gefürchteten punitive damages, ausschließt, könnte Anadarko jetzt - nach zulassung der Klagen auf punitive damages zu dem Schluß gekommen sein, dass man lieber einen höheren Preis zahlt, um aus diesem Risiko heraus zu kommen.
Insofern ist das Agreement möglicherweise keine uneingeschränkt positive Nachricht.
Morgen,
stellvertretend für BP an Anadarko: "Die Firma dankt"
stellvertretend für BP an Anadarko: "Die Firma dankt"
Schönen Guten Morgen wünsche ich,
es scheinen nun doch wieder positive News über BP zu kommen:
17 October 2011
BP ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH ANADARKO
PETROLEUM COMPANY OF CLAIMS RELATED TO
DEEPWATER HORIZON ACCIDENT
BP today announced that it has reached agreement with Anadarko Petroleum Company ("Anadarko") to settle all claims between the companies related to the Deepwater Horizon accident. Anadarko - which had a 25 per cent interest in the MC252 (Macondo) prospect - and BP have concluded that entering into a settlement is in the best interest of the parties to resolve pending disputes. The agreement is not an admission of liability by any party regarding the accident.
Under the settlement agreement, Anadarko will pay BP $4 billion in a single cash payment. BP will apply the payment to the $20 billion trust it established that is available to meet individual, business and government claims, as well as the cost of the natural resource damages. Anadarko will also transfer all of its 25 per cent interest in the MC252 lease to BP.
In addition, Anadarko will no longer pursue its allegations of gross negligence with respect to BP. Anadarko and BP have agreed to work cooperatively with respect to indemnified claims, and Anadarko has the opportunity for a 12.5 per cent participation in future recoveries from third parties or insurance proceeds cumulatively exceeding $1.5 billion, up to a total cap of $1 billion.
Finally, the parties have also agreed to mutual releases of claims against each other. BP has agreed to indemnify Anadarko for certain claims arising from the accident. However, BP's indemnity excludes civil, criminal or administrative fines and penalties, claims for punitive damages, and certain other claims.
"This settlement represents a positive resolution of a significant uncertainty and it resolves the issues among all the leaseholders of the Macondo well," said Bob Dudley, BP group chief executive. "There is clear progress with parties stepping forward to meet their obligations and help fund the economic and environmental restoration of the Gulf. It's time for the contractors, including Transocean and Halliburton, to do the same."
BP previously announced settlements with MOEX, which had a 10 per cent interest in the Macondo well, and Weatherford, which provided drilling equipment. Consistent with official investigations that found the accident was the result of multiple causes, involving multiple parties, BP is working to ensure that other parties, including Halliburton and Transocean, contribute appropriately. Multiple official investigations, including those conducted by the Presidential Commission and the Marine Board of Investigation, found that conduct by those parties contributed to the accident. The issuance of regulatory violations last week to BP, Transocean and Halliburton by the US Department of Interior demonstrates that the contractors responsible for well control and cementing, not just the operator, should be held accountable for their conduct.
From the outset, BP has committed to paying all legitimate claims and fulfilling its obligations to the Gulf Coast communities under the Oil Pollution Act. BP has to date paid out more than $7 billion.
es scheinen nun doch wieder positive News über BP zu kommen:
17 October 2011
BP ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH ANADARKO
PETROLEUM COMPANY OF CLAIMS RELATED TO
DEEPWATER HORIZON ACCIDENT
BP today announced that it has reached agreement with Anadarko Petroleum Company ("Anadarko") to settle all claims between the companies related to the Deepwater Horizon accident. Anadarko - which had a 25 per cent interest in the MC252 (Macondo) prospect - and BP have concluded that entering into a settlement is in the best interest of the parties to resolve pending disputes. The agreement is not an admission of liability by any party regarding the accident.
Under the settlement agreement, Anadarko will pay BP $4 billion in a single cash payment. BP will apply the payment to the $20 billion trust it established that is available to meet individual, business and government claims, as well as the cost of the natural resource damages. Anadarko will also transfer all of its 25 per cent interest in the MC252 lease to BP.
In addition, Anadarko will no longer pursue its allegations of gross negligence with respect to BP. Anadarko and BP have agreed to work cooperatively with respect to indemnified claims, and Anadarko has the opportunity for a 12.5 per cent participation in future recoveries from third parties or insurance proceeds cumulatively exceeding $1.5 billion, up to a total cap of $1 billion.
Finally, the parties have also agreed to mutual releases of claims against each other. BP has agreed to indemnify Anadarko for certain claims arising from the accident. However, BP's indemnity excludes civil, criminal or administrative fines and penalties, claims for punitive damages, and certain other claims.
"This settlement represents a positive resolution of a significant uncertainty and it resolves the issues among all the leaseholders of the Macondo well," said Bob Dudley, BP group chief executive. "There is clear progress with parties stepping forward to meet their obligations and help fund the economic and environmental restoration of the Gulf. It's time for the contractors, including Transocean and Halliburton, to do the same."
BP previously announced settlements with MOEX, which had a 10 per cent interest in the Macondo well, and Weatherford, which provided drilling equipment. Consistent with official investigations that found the accident was the result of multiple causes, involving multiple parties, BP is working to ensure that other parties, including Halliburton and Transocean, contribute appropriately. Multiple official investigations, including those conducted by the Presidential Commission and the Marine Board of Investigation, found that conduct by those parties contributed to the accident. The issuance of regulatory violations last week to BP, Transocean and Halliburton by the US Department of Interior demonstrates that the contractors responsible for well control and cementing, not just the operator, should be held accountable for their conduct.
From the outset, BP has committed to paying all legitimate claims and fulfilling its obligations to the Gulf Coast communities under the Oil Pollution Act. BP has to date paid out more than $7 billion.
Meldung 15.10.2011 - WallstreetJournal: 
BP erhält Erlaubnis zur Bewerbung um neue Förderlizenzen am Golf von Mexiko
Quelle : http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020400230457662…
BP erhält Erlaubnis zur Bewerbung um neue Förderlizenzen am Golf von Mexiko
Quelle : http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020400230457662…
I'm very sorry, 4,5 Mrd ist nur der BP-Anteil, das Gesamtinvestitionsvolumen beträgt 10 Mrd GBP:
http://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/3503770-bp-und-par…
http://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/3503770-bp-und-par…
Trading Spotlight
Auf einer Seite der Royal Dutch Shell ist heuet das BP Logo größer als das von Shell selbst:
http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2011/10/13/bp-unveils-north-se…
Shell verneigt sich hier als junior Partner ehrfurchtsvoll vor dem Projektführer BP. 4,5 Mrd. britische Pfund werden in die weitere Erschließung der Nordsee investiert.
Eindeutig besser, das Geld hier zu investieren als in russischen Küstengewässern...
http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2011/10/13/bp-unveils-north-se…
Shell verneigt sich hier als junior Partner ehrfurchtsvoll vor dem Projektführer BP. 4,5 Mrd. britische Pfund werden in die weitere Erschließung der Nordsee investiert.
Eindeutig besser, das Geld hier zu investieren als in russischen Küstengewässern...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.202.344 von Milesstyles am 12.10.11 14:19:58Zitat: "Shushan said in a three page order. “There was undue delay on Halliburton’s part in asserting the fraud claim."
Kommentar: Es gibt derzeit keine besseren Nachrichten ! Die Löffeln die Suppe allesamt gemeinsam aus. Haliburton´s Strategie bröckelt von Monat zu Monat weg. Die News sind durchweg gut.
Sicher schöpfen Anleger endlich wieder etwas Vertrauen.
Kommentar: Es gibt derzeit keine besseren Nachrichten !
Die Löffeln die Suppe allesamt gemeinsam aus. Haliburton´s Strategie bröckelt von Monat zu Monat weg. Die News sind durchweg gut. Sicher schöpfen Anleger endlich wieder etwas Vertrauen.
Sers,
hier ein Bericht, den "ellestor" aus dem finanzen.net Forum gefunden hat..
zu geil!
Oct. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Halliburton Co. can’t pursue an allegation of fraud in its claims against BP Plc over the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, a judge in New Orleans said.
A Halliburton unit that provided cementing services for the project claimed BP hid information about an additional hydrocarbon zone in the well, a possibly dangerous condition, before and after the blowout. Halliburton said it didn’t learn of critical data about the zone until a July 7, 2011, deposition of a BP scientist.
BP denied any failure to disclose information and said Halliburton missed a deadline to file claims over the spill. Halliburton waited too long to bring the allegation and can’t amend its complaint, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan said.
“Halliburton possessed sufficient information either through its own investigation or with information produced by BP to assert its fraud claim by May 20, 2011,” Shushan said in a three page order. “There was undue delay on Halliburton’s part in asserting the fraud claim. There would be undue prejudice to BP if the amendment is allowed.”
Blowout, Explosion
The Macondo blowout and the explosion that followed killed 11 workers and set off the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. The accident and spill led to hundreds of lawsuits against London-based BP and its partners and contractors. The lawsuits over economic losses and personal injuries have been combined before U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier in New Orleans.
Daren Beaudo, BP’s spokesman, declined to comment on the ruling today. Beverly Stafford, Halliburton’s spokeswoman, had no immediate comment.
The lawsuits also name as defendants Transocean Ltd., the Switzerland-based owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that exploded; Houston-based Halliburton; and Cameron International Corp., which provided blowout-prevention equipment. BP’s minority partners in the well, Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Mitsui & Co.’s Moex Offshore LLC unit, were also sued.
Quelle: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-11/...nst-bp-judge-…
hier ein Bericht, den "ellestor" aus dem finanzen.net Forum gefunden hat..
zu geil!
Oct. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Halliburton Co. can’t pursue an allegation of fraud in its claims against BP Plc over the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, a judge in New Orleans said.
A Halliburton unit that provided cementing services for the project claimed BP hid information about an additional hydrocarbon zone in the well, a possibly dangerous condition, before and after the blowout. Halliburton said it didn’t learn of critical data about the zone until a July 7, 2011, deposition of a BP scientist.
BP denied any failure to disclose information and said Halliburton missed a deadline to file claims over the spill. Halliburton waited too long to bring the allegation and can’t amend its complaint, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan said.
“Halliburton possessed sufficient information either through its own investigation or with information produced by BP to assert its fraud claim by May 20, 2011,” Shushan said in a three page order. “There was undue delay on Halliburton’s part in asserting the fraud claim. There would be undue prejudice to BP if the amendment is allowed.”
Blowout, Explosion
The Macondo blowout and the explosion that followed killed 11 workers and set off the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. The accident and spill led to hundreds of lawsuits against London-based BP and its partners and contractors. The lawsuits over economic losses and personal injuries have been combined before U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier in New Orleans.
Daren Beaudo, BP’s spokesman, declined to comment on the ruling today. Beverly Stafford, Halliburton’s spokeswoman, had no immediate comment.
The lawsuits also name as defendants Transocean Ltd., the Switzerland-based owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that exploded; Houston-based Halliburton; and Cameron International Corp., which provided blowout-prevention equipment. BP’s minority partners in the well, Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Mitsui & Co.’s Moex Offshore LLC unit, were also sued.
Quelle: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-11/...nst-bp-judge-…
06 October 2011
BP drives stake through the Southern Corridor
By Matthew Hulbert
Just when Moscow thought it had sealed the Southern corridor through the nascent South Stream pipeline, BP has thrown a serious spanner in the works. For Brussels, BP's plan to build its own pipeline from Azerbaijan might even be more upsetting.
More or less out of the blue, British oil major BP has come up with a fourth prospective European pipeline option in the Southern Corridor, catchily named the South East Europe Pipeline as an alternative to Nabucco, Trans Adriatic (TAP) and ITGI (Interconnector Turkey-Greece-Italy). [...]
http://www.europeanenergyreview.eu
BP drives stake through the Southern Corridor
By Matthew Hulbert
Just when Moscow thought it had sealed the Southern corridor through the nascent South Stream pipeline, BP has thrown a serious spanner in the works. For Brussels, BP's plan to build its own pipeline from Azerbaijan might even be more upsetting.
More or less out of the blue, British oil major BP has come up with a fourth prospective European pipeline option in the Southern Corridor, catchily named the South East Europe Pipeline as an alternative to Nabucco, Trans Adriatic (TAP) and ITGI (Interconnector Turkey-Greece-Italy). [...]
http://www.europeanenergyreview.eu
Es ist jetzt die Zeit der Zocker und Trader.
Verunsicherte Langfristanleger, die nun aus lauter Angst verkaufen,
werden rasiert - alles völlig legal.
Wenn man die Probleme hingegen bis auf den Grund bedenkt, sollte man mit vernünftigen Aktien ruhiger schlafen als mit Staatsanleihen - auch wenn der Aktienmarkt zunehmend volatil wird und (vielleicht) das Tief noch nicht gesehen hat.
Sollte das Kapital hingegen aus den Staatsanleihen irgendwann abfließen, bleiben nicht ganz viele Möglichkeiten der rentablen Anlage..
Verunsicherte Langfristanleger, die nun aus lauter Angst verkaufen,
werden rasiert - alles völlig legal.
Wenn man die Probleme hingegen bis auf den Grund bedenkt, sollte man mit vernünftigen Aktien ruhiger schlafen als mit Staatsanleihen - auch wenn der Aktienmarkt zunehmend volatil wird und (vielleicht) das Tief noch nicht gesehen hat.
Sollte das Kapital hingegen aus den Staatsanleihen irgendwann abfließen, bleiben nicht ganz viele Möglichkeiten der rentablen Anlage..
Durchsuchen
BP ein Kauf
