checkAd

    RARE EARTH & BRAZIL LITHIUM sowie in Australien (Seite 10)

    eröffnet am 02.02.24 18:38:07 von
    neuester Beitrag 30.04.24 08:42:37 von
    Beiträge: 93
    ID: 1.375.499
    Aufrufe heute: 1
    Gesamt: 2.676
    Aktive User: 0

    ISIN: AU0000089351 · WKN: A2P5GN · Symbol: ENV
    0,0190
     
    AUD
    0,00 %
    0,0000 AUD
    Letzter Kurs 21.05.24 Sydney

    Werte aus der Branche Rohstoffe

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,7405+33,42
    221,00+20,70
    0,7750+20,16
    742,05+19,92
    16,270+16,71
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,8000-11,11
    0,8700-11,22
    10,770-13,65
    8.650,00-16,93
    11.000,00-31,83

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 10

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.02.24 10:01:00
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      There will be more to come, just be patient.

      HIGHLIGHTS Enova enters an Option Agreement to investigate Lithium and RareEarth exploration opportunities in Brazil Completion of Due Diligence and Board Decision to proceed withacquisition of highly prospective Poços de Caldas Rare Earth & LithiumValley Tenements in Minas Gerais Brazil. Completion of the deal issubject to shareholder approval. Enova’s entry into Brazil well received, with strategic expansions likely. Cattle Creek bulk sample drilling on track for metallurgical testing torenew the Charley Creek Project Scoping Study. $1.5m Capital Raising Completed in Q3 2023 paves way for anaggressive exploration program.
      eNova Mining | 0,018 $
      Avatar
      schrieb am 02.02.24 18:42:13
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      aus HC

      Smacky

      Good call & I'm glad others here know a bit about the history

      Your download of the the April 2013 release leaves out the words highlighted in yellow below - which try to explain why the release is actually "not compliant"

      "Cautionary Statements

      The Scoping Study and this report on the results thereof have been prepared to comply with therecently updated 2012 edition of the JORC Code. As such, the following should be noted: ‘TheScoping Study referred to in this report is based on low‐level technical and economic assessments,and is insufficient to support estimation of Ore Reserves or to provide assurance of an economicdevelopment case at this stage, or to provide certainty that the conclusions of the Scoping Study willbe realised.’ (JORC Code Cautionary Statement).

      For the purposes of ASX Listing Rules 5.16 and 5.17 as amended, the Scoping Study containsparameters that are defined as “production targets” in these Listing Rules, and these productiontargets are used to generate “forecast financial information”. It should also be noted that as statedimmediately above, a Scoping Study is not based upon Ore Reserves, but primarily upon MineralResources. Initial Resource estimates at Charley Creek (May 2012) produced the following results:
       Indicated Resources of 387Mt @ 300ppm TREO, supported by
       Inferred Resources of 418Mt @ 290ppm TREO.

      Within these Resources, the block models contain approximately 70Mt @ 500ppm TREO.

      The production target outputs utilised in the Scoping Study require:
       54Mt @ 500ppm TREO in the first five years of production, followed by
       300Mt @ 300ppmTREO over the succeeding 15 years.

      Therefore, there are “reasonable prospects” that the “production targets” will be achieved,particularly given the large prospective areas at Charley Creek (around 2,500km2) where drilling willbe extended in the next round of Resource definition.

      In the absence of the mine scheduling studies necessary to convert Resources to Reserves, it isprudent to classify some of the required production target of 54Mt@500ppm TREO as ExplorationTarget, since no studies have yet been completed to establish in what sequence the Resource can beextracted. The production target is therefore based as to approximately 85% on Indicated Resource,and up to 15% upon Exploration Target.

      The use of the term “Exploration Target” in association with a production target necessitatesinclusion of a cautionary statement under the ASX Listing Rules: “The potential quantity and grade ofan Exploration Target is conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to determine aMineral Resource and there is no certainty that further exploration work will result in determinationof Mineral Resources or that the production target itself will be realised”. An Exploration Target alsorequires a JORC Code cautionary statement: “This target remains conceptual in nature, and there hasat this time been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource, and it remains uncertain iffurther exploration will result in the estimation of an additional Mineral Resource”. (JORC Codecautionary statement). The Exploration Target referred to here, and to be explored in the next roundof Resource drilling is: 50Mt to 100Mt at grades of 500ppmTREO to 1000ppmTREO. A more detaileddiscussion of the Exploration Target is to be found on Page 6 of this document."

      I had extensive e-mail discussions with Eric during the period October 2019 to July 2021 because like many here I thought the 2013 announcement was JORC 2012 compliant. It wasn't, according to the new BoD who took over when the Crossland rescue took place.

      The REE is there, of that I am convinced (IMOO) & in my discussions I pointed out that I felt the BoD was going about proving everything in an illogical manner - I said, in one e-mail:

      "2. It would seem to me to be entirely logical to know that the company actually has the REE (from the assays results) before spending money on figuring out how to extract those REE if they are in fact there because if the assays prove to be inconclusive, then the company has wasted all its funds chasing a dream because there are no REE to extract"

      To which the reply was

      "a. We have established what is in the ground. Enova cannot released yet until we establish a cut-off grade and ensure ore recovery. To establish a cut-off grade you must know the process-ability of the ore and the economics to do so. Under JORC reporting , we can not refer to Charley Creek as having resources or ore with present information.
      b. Enova has assayed all the holes necessary for resource purposes (105 holes on a regular grid). The partly assayed infill assays are for metallurgical test work. However, it also adds assays to our drill hole database too, so why wouldn’t we also use them for resource purposes"

      & on went the discussion

      Charley Creek is the icing on the cake - not many shareholders have come to realise this yet. Look at the "indicated & inferred" resource above (387mt + 418mt). Something is obviously sitting there in the ground ready to be extracted. How much & how rich is yet to be formerly proven, but when it is.....?
      eNova Mining | 0,018 $
      Avatar
      schrieb am 02.02.24 18:38:07
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      Sollte man sich mal ansehen könnte sich entwickeln sehr gute

      Liegenschaften in Brasilien un Australien.

      Kann nur in Australien gehandelt werden.

      https://www.enovamining.com/

      https://stocknessmonster.com/announcements/env.asx-3A635527/

      https://stocknessmonster.com/announcements/env.asx-3A633408/

      Gut zu verfolgen auf Hotcopper.com
      eNova Mining | 0,018 $
      • 1
      • 10
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      RARE EARTH & BRAZIL LITHIUM sowie in Australien