Von 15.000 Dollar Umsatz (2004) auf 200 Millionen in 2006 - 500 Beiträge pro Seite (Seite 16)

[edeka1]

Wenn ich das hier so lese, muß mal wohl annehmen das hier die

besten Trader der Welt in FRPT investiert sind.

Lest euch aber noch dieses Posting genau durch.
Wenn nur 50 % von dem stimmt, habe ich eine eine logische Erklärung warum der Share Price die letzten Monate so deutlich in den Keller gerauscht ist. Was dieser User schreibt klingt m. M nach logisch und ist auch nachvollziehbar.

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=96752&pt=m…

Viel Spaß noch mit FRPT die nächsten Monate. Sie werden auf alle Fälle turbulent.

[kyron7htx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.866.690 von Boersenkrieger am 26.07.07 21:03:56

Da hast wohl recht. Nur mit großen Geld kannste Aktien pushen oder bashen!

[mc-plop]

Na gut erwischt, ganz so erfolgreich war ich heute doch nicht...

Hab heute nun hoffentlich das letzte mal zu 16,27 $ nachgekauft, war der meinung das spätestens das nasdaq allzeittief bei 14,80 $ den Rebound einleiten wird, konnte mich aber wieder nicht gedulden und hab schon zu früh nachgekauft.

Ist echt erstaunlich wie gut die charttechnik hier funktioniert, bravorös abgeprallt am nasdaq-atl, hoffe nun mal auf einen anstieg bis 20 $ in den nächsten tagen.
Ich finde langsam wird es mal wieder zeit für eine schöne nachbörslich news, gefolgt von einem anständigen gap-up am nächsten morgen.

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.866.569 von mc-plop am 26.07.07 20:56:56

ich mache das seit 8 jahren habe in denn anfangsjahre so viel kohle verbratttteeeennn da müsssen andre sehr lange arbeiten!!!


und ja ich habe heute bei unter 14,70 voll gekauft!!!und hatte glück am lod gekauft zu haben kommt nur slten vor!!!!

und ich werde auch wieder verkaufen falls wir nochmal auf 15 usd starten bzw etwas drunter!!

denn dann kann es locker auf 12 usd gehen!!!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.867.036 von mc-plop am 26.07.07 21:24:03

Naja wenigstens bin ich inzwischen wieder bei +- 0 mit meinem nachkauf von heute nachmittag...

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.867.056 von pagitz01 am 26.07.07 21:24:53

Hast du bei 14,70 $ nach gefühl oder nach charttechnik gekauft ?

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.867.103 von mc-plop am 26.07.07 21:27:32

10% chart!!!!

aber wenn eine aktie viele tage hintereinander so krass nfällt ohne news!!!

dann muss man mal einsteigen nach gefühl kann ja nicht nur fallen muss steigen und wenns nur ne technische gegenreaktion is dann bin ich halt wieder raus 2-3 usd sind schon ein schöner betrag!!!

[coolrunning]

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
16:51 $ 16.30 100
16:47 $ 16.31 100
16:46 $ 16.32 100
16:39 $ 15.4962 45,600
16:29 $ 15.5092 1,000
16:28 $ 16.40 100
16:28 $ 16.46 100
16:21 $ 15.5092 340,300
16:08 $ 16.50 200
16:06 $ 16.49 100
16:05 $ 15.65 4,000
16:03 $ 16.355 250
16:02 $ 16.275 600
16:02 $ 16.28 3,000


Wer´s immer noch nicht checkt, was hier abgeht, der hat an der Börse nicht verloren...

Long and strong sage ich !

running

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.868.534 von coolrunning am 26.07.07 22:58:52

ich blick´s nicht (vor allem FRPT nicht) aber ich bleib trotzdem drin ein paar jährchen noch weil´s so spannend ist mit dem ding.... würde mir echt fehlen den täglichen intraday anzuschauen

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.868.584 von Boersenkrieger am 26.07.07 23:05:27

und ich schließe mich Dir an

[mc-plop]

So wir haben jetzt 12 Handelstage gebraucht um von 24 $ auf 14,66 $ zu fallen, also eine Vernichtung von 635 Mio $ MK in 12 Tagen..., oder von 1 Mrd. $ in 2 Monaten.

Ich bin der Meinung mittlerweile reicht ein Funke um FRPT wieder auf 24 $ zu treiben, überverkauft noch und nöcher.

FRPT wird in den nächsten Jahren alle Fahrzeuge verkaufen die sie produzieren, ob an die USA oder an andere Nationen sei mal dahingestellt.

Wenn demnächst die zahlen fürs Q2 veröffentlicht werden wird den leuten mal wieder bewußt was für eine firma frpt eigentlich ist.

Der Intradayreversal heute war ja schon ganz nett, aber der große knall kommt nun hoffentlich bald, so ein zweistelliges plus morgen wär nicht schlecht.

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.489 von mc-plop am 27.07.07 01:00:22

Vergiß es ... der Kurs ist den möglichen Aufträgen davongelaufen ... das organische Wachstum hinkt hinterher ... man kann die hart erarbeiteten Möglichkeiten nicht umsetzen und andere machen das Rennen (ob sie esa besse machen, ist nicht die Frage)

Übrigens, ich hab mir mal die Vehikles ein wenig genauer angesehen - MEINE Truppe würd ich damit nicht ausrüsten ...

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.498 von Guerilla Investor am 27.07.07 01:07:27

...sind auch nicht für Zinnsoldaten geeignet... hab auch noch meine sammlung spielen wir mal ne runde

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.507 von Boersenkrieger am 27.07.07 01:11:37

Wenn du magst, gern ne Partie Schach oder viel lieber ne Partie "Go" ...

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.518 von Guerilla Investor am 27.07.07 01:18:13

was is go ??? gogo-tänzerin

[Heyjoe]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.522 von Boersenkrieger am 27.07.07 01:21:53

du outest dich nicht gerade als samurai!

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.869.522 von Boersenkrieger am 27.07.07 01:21:53

Ein über 5000 Jahre altes asiatisches strategisches Brettspiel ...

Es gibt weltweit mehr aktive Go-Spieler als Fußballer ...

Mehr Info: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(Brettspiel)

[coolrunning]

The story of Force Protection and MRAP - Not over Yet
aus IV

Around a year ago, there was quite a bit of speculation about large contracts for Force Protection, Inc (FPI). It was hoped that in 2007, contracts would be given for over a thousand vehicles and that FPI would get more than half the contracts.

Well, FPI did get more contracts for more vehicles than anyone in the middle of 2006 thought was possible.

As the size of the MRAP program grew, people hoped that FPI could hang on to getting over half the contracts but this became impossible when the Military decided that they wanted 4060 vehicles build and delivered by the end of December 2007.

General Brogan was questioned in a US House of Representatives Hearing on Equipment 1/17/2007:

"QUESTION: How bout your target delivery date to get them in the Marine Corps hands, and you explained to me that there is additional work that is done by the Marine Corps before they’re sent to theatre. What is your target date to get those vehicles in your possession, and what’s your target date to have them fielded in the theatre.

BROGAN: Yes, Sir, and I’m not, as I indicated, I’m not buying just for the Marine Corps, so that 4,060 vehicles, I’ve set a stretch goal for my team of the end of this year, 31 December to have those vehicles delivered to the U.S. Government."

Since then, it has been learned from other comments by the military that the target for MRAP is to build 1300 MRAPs per month by December 2007.

Spartan Motors is currently making Chassis for FPI and GDLS for BAE for the ILAV Cougar. Spartan will be able to manufacture 432 units per month at the end of August and is currently ramping up their capacity to that number. They plan to increase capacity to 672 units per month by the end of March 2008. The 432 and 672 units per month capacity is assuming that they are working one shift with four day work weeks. Currently Spartan has no contracts from BAE but expect to get them in the future.

Spartan indicated that they believe that FPI and GDLS will be doing some of their Chassis work internally or will be giving it to other strategic partners.

According to Spartan, the main issue right now with the production ramp-up is availability of parts. Once they start reliably getting parts, they should be able to manufacture at capacity. They believe that the parts will begin arriving on a consistent basis sometime in the third quarter allowing them to manufacture at capacity. In addition, they indicated that they could add another work day or work additional shifts to increase the number of vehicles manufactured beyond the 432 per month if needed.

The joint venture of Force Protection and General Dynamics, “Force Dynamics” or (FD) is concentrating on ramping up as fast as possible.

Since the military began emphasizing the large production ramp-up to 1300 vehicles per month at the end of December 2007, the joint venture of FPI and GDLS indicated that they could ramp-up to manufacture 1000 vehicles per month in 2008. However, the vehicle ramp-up in 2007 is not known. Some preliminary numbers were discussed by FPI but none seemed to be final targets. Possibly one of the reasons that the vehicle ramp-up numbers were not given is because of the parts issues that were discussed by Spartan Motors on their Q2 Conference Call.

If however, the parts issues are solved in Q3, then it is possible that FD will be manufacturing 400 vehicles per month.

General Dynamics on their conference call discussed the revenue they are expecting to get from MRAP vehicles. They put the revenue in the range of $300 million to $400 million dollars in 2007. This is 600 to 800 vehicles. General Dynamics is in the early stages of their ramp-up so this would indicate that General Dynamics expects to be manufacturing somewhere in the range of 150 to 180 vehicles per month by December 2007. The number of vehicles FPI and other strategic partners will manufacture is less clear but based on current manufacturing and how fast they are ramping up, that number could be in the range of 200 to 400 vehicles per month by December 2007. There is a large variance but that is because there is so little information available.

To keep FPI’s ramp-up going at the current rate, FPI will have manufactured all the vehicles ordered by the military before December 2007. However, FPI is not confident of getting any orders anytime soon and don’t appear to know when the next order will be given. They do know that based on what the military has told them that if they build the vehicles, the military will buy them. The bottom line then is that if no new contracts are given, FD might have to order parts and materials for vehicles that have not been ordered but will be able to sell everyone that they make.

What was unexpected has been the size of vehicle orders going to Navistar for the MaxxPro and Armored Holding for the Caiman MRAP vehicle. Neither Armored Holdings nor Navistar have started delivering vehicles to the military. The only production guideline the military has on when the vehicles would be delivered are the schedules given by the companies winning the bid.

Companies bidding on MRAP contracts have a large incentive to impress the military with how many they could make to get large orders even if they could not manufacture them on time. The large orders will allow them to start profitably producing military vehicles and get their foot in the door for a large potential future market. The larger the order they can get, the less money is left for the military to allocate to other vendors and this is also a huge incentive to get large orders whether or not they can make the vehicles on time.

Another reason to suspect the ramp-up times is that Force Protection has been ramping up production for over a year and General Dynamics has been working with Force Protection on the MRAP contracts for seven months yet the combined companies are still having issues getting enough parts.

The Navistar MaxxPro is reportedly build on a more modular basis using smaller steel panels that are bolted together instead of welded. The armor is covered by add-on armor panels provided by Plasan Sasa. Although the MaxxPro passed blast testing, this type of construction technique is believed by many to be inherently weaker than the construction technique used on most MRAP vehicles and most armored vehicles in general of welding structural elements together. However, the MaxxPro is believed by all to be much safer than a Humvee.

Less is known about the Armored Holdings Caiman than is known about any other vehicle. The vehicle was rumored to be very problematic in testing and was only chosen by the Military due to issues with manufacturing and ordering the Bushmaster. The military needed to place another large order for vehicles if they were to get industry to ramp-up production of MRAP vehicles so that they could get 1300 per month by the end of 2007.

To meet the production schedule, for the Navistar MaxxPro, it is believed that Navistar will have to be manufacturing in excess of 450 per month by the end of December. For Armored Holdings to meet the schedule, they should be manufacturing around 300 per month. BAE should be at 100 per month (BAE should require at least 4 month lead time to get significant numbers of parts). Together, the Navistar, Armored Holdings and BAE should be at 850 per month. The joint venture FD only has to manufacture 450 per month to get to the 1300 mentioned by the general assuming even more contracts to other vendors are not given.

My assumptions are that BAE’s ramp-up schedule is reasonable. They have partnered with FPI to build ILAV cougars in the past and their current RG-33 vehicle appears very similar to the Cougar and should require similar manufacturing steps and procedures. From the perspective of resources, Navistar has sufficient resources to manufacture a large number of MRAP vehicles. The question will be can they get sufficient parts on time to do it and can Plasan Sasa provide sufficient armor? For the Armored Holdings vehicle, they don’t have experience making MRAP vehicles except as a subcontractor for FPI. And with that contract, they are not manufacturing quickly or large numbers of vehicles. Armored Holdings seems least likely to manufacture to the schedule.

The joint venture of FD began ramping up months before the competitors. They are most likely to manufacture ahead of schedule because they began ramping up early and are in the late stages of solving parts supply issues needed to manufacture hundreds of vehicles per month. FPI developed the Cougar and have been manufacturing it for several years and therefore, it is the vehicle that the manufacturing process has had the most time to become mature. The other vendors will be manufacturing a new product and what issues and problems they may face are largely unknown.
In the next 60 to 90 days, a solicitation for MRAP II vehicles should be given. FPI has their Category I entry called the Cheetah for this competition and are building the factory to make the vehicle. FPI expects to be able to manufacture 2000 Cheetahs in 2008.

FPI is currently the sole source for Category III MRAP vehicles called the Buffalo. This is expected to remain a vehicle manufacturing at a rate of under 20 per month. It is expected that FPI may get orders for additional JERRV Cougars or other Cougars outside of the MRAP competition in 2007 and 2008.

In 2006, FPI’s revenue was just under $200 million. In 2007, FPI’s revenue is expected to be approximately 4 to 5 times greater than in 2006. In 2008, FPI may easily double their 2007 revenue because the military is now discussing buying at least 15000 MRAP vehicles and possibly many more. The joint venture between FPI and GDLS has already indicated that they could if needed produce 1000 vehicles per month.

Although the stock price of FPI is in a major decline, FPI’s business has not declined nor have the opportunities available to FPI declined. What has changed is there are more competitors that are getting part of the MRAP business. Many of the competitors with large contracts have marginal vehicles and do not as of yet have a MRAP II vehicle. FPI currently has the most battle tested vehicle that is the gold standard in Iraq and Afghanistan. Once production has ramped up, this puts FPI in a good competitive position versus the competitors. FPI’s new Category I vehicle the Cheetah puts them in an even better position as this is the smallest MRAP vehicle of any of the major competitors.

As to the “story of FPI and MRAP”, I believe the best is yet to come.

running

[Gexe006]

Form 8-K for FORCE PROTECTION INC


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

27-Jul-2007

Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Bala



ITEM 2.03. CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR AN OBLIGATION
UNDER AN
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMNET OF A REGISTRANT.
On July 20, 2007, Force Protection, Inc. (the "Registrant") entered into a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") with Wachovia Bank, National Association ("Wachovia"), pursuant to which the Registrant agreed to certain terms that govern a revolving credit facility made available to the Registrant by Wachovia. Concurrently with the execution of the Loan Agreement, the Registrant issued a promissory note to Wachovia in the original principal amount of $50,000,000 (the "Note"). The unpaid principal balance of the Note accrues interest at a floating rate per annum equal to the 1-month LIBOR market index rate plus 2.0%. Accrued interest is due and payable on a monthly basis, starting on August 31, 2007 and all outstanding principal is due and payable on September 30, 2007, unless extended by Wachovia. Until September 30, 2007, the Registrant may borrow, repay and reborrow additional amounts from Wachovia under the Note, so long as the total principal balance outstanding under the Note does not exceed $50,000,000. In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Registrant also entered into a Security Agreement with Wachovia pursuant to which the Registrant granted Wachovia a security interest in all of its personal property and fixtures, of every kind and nature.

[coolrunning]

Oshkosh Out of MRAP!!
July 27 (Bloomberg) -- Oshkosh Truck Corp.'s design for a
truck to transport U.S. troops was rejected by the Pentagon after
testing raised too many questions about its ability to carry
additional armor and withstand a bomb attack, according to a
government letter to the company.
The Marine Corps in a letter to Oshkosh Truck official Moss
Ruedinger June 29 said the design met ``minimum requirements'' to
protect crew and troops, yet explosives testing of select areas
``caused concern regarding overall vehicle survivability.''
Unspecified ``automotive'' and ``human factors'' also ``preclude
safe vehicle operation,'' the letter said.
The Pentagon is beginning to award production contracts for
at least 8,000 Mine-Resistant, Ambush-Protected vehicles, or
MRAPs, in what is now a $12 billion program.
Roadside bombs are the leading killer of U.S. troops in
Iraq, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates has deemed the purchase
and fielding of MRAPs the military's top acquisition priority
because of their potential to reduce casualties in Iraq.
John Young, the Pentagon's top MRAP program official, told a
congressional committee July 19 he has ``a blank check'' to buy
as many vehicles as fast as possible. Congress has approved $5.4
billion for this fiscal year, including permission to shift $1.2
billion previously approved for other programs to MRAP purchases.
The money will increase production of MRAPs by 63 percent to
a total of 3,900 by Dec. 31 from the 2,400 planned.

V-Shaped Hull

The trucks have a raised chassis and V-shaped hull that
makes them four times safer than traditional flat-bottomed
trucks, according to the U.S. Marine Corps, which is heading
purchases for all branches of the military.
Oshkosh Truck, based in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, to date has
received a $30.2 million contract to produce up to 100 MRAP
vehicles, including four test vehicles. ``This letter is to
inform you of the government's intent not to order any additional
items under this contract,'' the Marine Corps letter said.
Oshkosh spokesman Joaquin Salas declined repeated requests
for comment on the letter. He also declined to comment on whether
the company plans to submit a design for the second round of MRAP
competition the Marines announced July 2 or whether it plans to
team as a subcontractor with one of the successful designers.
Marine Corps Systems Command spokeswoman First Lieutenant
Geraldine Carey had no comment on the letter.

Safety Concerns

The Command in its letter said the design deficiencies and
safety concerns detected in initial testing after February were
``borne out'' by a limited troop evaluation.
The government ``is convinced that remediation of this issue
would require significant redesign. The result would be an
unacceptable delay to future production orders,'' the letter
said.
Compounding survivability and design concerns, the Pentagon
said Oshkosh's design had ``insufficient'' potential to carry new
protection intended to blunt roadside bombs that use an explosive
charge supplied to Iraqi insurgents by Iran and can punch through
the toughest armor.
``This severely limits the government's options to expand
the vehicle's survivability characteristics,'' the letter said.
The Marine Corps Systems Command encouraged Oshkosh Truck to
partner with companies that have won a production contract.
Truck-building contracts worth over $200 million have been
awarded to Ladson, South Carolina-based Force Protection Inc.;
London-based BAE Systems Plc; Navistar International Corp.'s
International Military and Government unit in Warrenville,
Illinois; Armor Holdings Inc. in Jacksonville, Florida.


Das ist doch schön für uns FRPTler...

Ich bleibe bei meiner Prognose und bei meinen Aussagen:

Unter 40 Dollar verkaufe ich nicht.
Force wird über kurz oder lang übernommen.
Entscheidend ist hier nicht mehr die Qualität, denn die hat diverse Tests und Realeinsätze bestanden.
Entscheidend ist die Lieferfähigkeit und Produktionsmenge.
Denn der Cheetah kommt auch noch !

running

[edeka1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.866.816 von edeka1 am 26.07.07 21:12:16

Hallo,

wollte nur kurz mitteilen, das die PP anteile ab heute

regristriert sind.

[enna2]

Wieder ein roter Tag...der sechste in Folge...

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.878.534 von enna2 am 27.07.07 16:14:42

Noch sind wir knapp im Plus

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.878.587 von Gexe006 am 27.07.07 16:17:05

das steht aber bei ADVFN aber anders. 1,23 Minus.

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.881.638 von wohinistmeinGeld am 27.07.07 19:50:03

Das ist der Echtzeitchart von ADVFN und mittlerweile sind wir wieder grün
Kannsich aber schnell wieder ändern

[coolrunning]

S-3 Registration Statement Effective
SEC Declares Force Protection S-3 Registration Statement Effective
Last Update: 5:09 PM ET Jul 27, 2007

LADSON, S.C., July 27, 2007 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Force Protection (FRPT : force protection inc com new:

FRPT first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, announced today that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has declared effective the Company's recently amended Form S-3 at 5:00 p.m. on July 26, 2007 with respect to the registration of 13.0 million shares of Force Protection common stock.

Force Protection is a leading blast and ballistics research and manufacturing enterprise, specializing in the development and production of vehicles that are designed to save the lives of troops around the world by shielding them from the deadly effects of roadside bombs, or IEDs, which have become the leading killer of U.S. troops in Iraq. Our vehicles have become the gold standard and the in-field performance of our Cougar and Buffalo vehicles is unmatched in the industry, standing as evidence that not all v- shaped hulls are created equally. Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. Visit the company's website at www.forceprotection.net.

This release contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning our business, future plans and objectives and the performance of our products. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties ultimately may not prove to be accurate. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The company cautions that these forward looking statements are further qualified by factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in the company's Form 10-K filing and other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (available at http://www.sec.gov) and the company's public statements. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any statements in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

running

[sampler]

n-tv Schlagzeilen:

Samstag, 28. Juli 2007
Einfluss in der Golf-Region
USA planen Waffenlieferungen

Angesichts des wachsenden regionalen Einflusses des Iran plant die US-Regierung umfangreiche neue Waffenlieferungen an Israel, Ägypten sowie an Saudi-Arabien und andere Golf-Staaten.

Wie die "Washington Post" unter Berufung auf namentlich nicht genannte Regierungsvertreter berichtete, soll Israel militärische Hilfe im Wert von 30 Milliarden Dollar (22 Mrd Euro) und Ägypten 13 Milliarden Dollar (9,5 Mrd Euro) über einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren erhalten. Zusammen mit geplanten Lieferungen über 20 Milliarden Dollar (14,7 Mrd Euro) an Saudi-Arabien und andere Golfstaaten wären dies die größten Waffengeschäfte der Regierung von George W. Bush, hieß es.

Zuletzt hatten einige US-Vertreter beklagt, die saudische Regierung trage nicht unbedingt dazu bei, dass sich die Lage im Irak verbessere.


Na! Da sollte doch bei Force auf was hängen bleiben


sampler

[Florian1989]

Guten Tag an Alle,

Ich verfolge hier nun schon seit einiger Zeit das Geschehen in diesem Forum und bin seit Dezember letzten Jahres auch in FPI investiert. Eigentlich war ich bis vor kurzem auch immer sehr zufrieden mit FPI doch nun sind in kürzester Zeit meine Gewinne auf ein minimales Plus geschmolzen. Ich bin aus der Aktie nicht herausgegangen weil ich eigentlich von der Firma Force Protection überzeugt bin.
Nun wollte ich einmal fragen wie Sie die momentane Situation bei FPI einschätzen und wie Sie die Zukunftsaussichten von FPI kurz- bzw. langfristig sehen

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Florian

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.892.229 von Florian1989 am 28.07.07 12:19:03

du warst sicher einer von dennen die gerne deutsch-aufsätze geschrieben haben

[carpediem2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.892.229 von Florian1989 am 28.07.07 12:19:03

Denke schon,dass hier mehr Gewinnchancen schlummern....als z.b. Postsparbuch,

Weniger Risiko, als Terax, Quest etc.

Mehr Adrenalin, als BlaBla-Fonds.

Und dazu noch eine der wenigen Rüstungsaktien,die man mit gutem Gewissen halten kann, und trotzdem mit Greenpeace-Aktivisten...Käffchen trinken kann.

Würde gerade zu gerne nachkaufen........aber Geld leihen zum Investieren verstösst ja gegen die Grundgesetze

[carpediem2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.895.863 von pagitz01 am 28.07.07 15:45:11

1989!! oder noch schreiben

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.895.863 von pagitz01 am 28.07.07 15:45:11

kann auch sein!!!

[longstoxx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.892.229 von Florian1989 am 28.07.07 12:19:03

Freut mich zu lesen, dass hier wenigstens einer um ein gewisses Niveau bemüht ist. Den Antworten zufolge stellt sich für Dich weniger Frage, ob Du das richtige Investment getätigt hast, sondern vielmehr, ob Du Dich der richtigen Community angeschlossen hast. Deine Entscheidung in allen Ehren, aber wenn ich mir´s recht überlege hat Dein Stil was Besseres verdient als Dich mit so etwas herumzuärgern.

Nun zu Deiner eigentlichen Frage: Ich habe nicht die leiseste Ahnung.

Ich finde nur, wer sowas im Depot hat, macht sich in meinen Augen suspekt. Solange Du noch im Plus bist, ist nichts passiert und Du könntest den Gewinn, nachdem Du die Aktie verkauft hast, spenden. Danach könntest Du Dich Investments zuwenden, die in jedem Fall integer sind.

[pagitz01]

Nun zu Deiner eigentlichen Frage: Ich habe nicht die leiseste Ahnung.



das beantwortet eh schon alles!!!


null ahnung aber reden!!!!

[carpediem2]

Neue Woche , neue.....
Einem Unternehmen wie FP kann man ja nur gratulieren....volle Auftragsbücher, rasantes Expandieren, starke Nachfrage.

Auch wenn die anderen Unternehmen grosse Aufträge bekammen, wird FP auch in Zukunft eine endscheidende Rolle spielen.

Selbst wenn vieleicht nach unten noch ein gewisser Spielraum besteht, können doch eher News wie Übernahme, weiterer Grossauftrag den Kurs jeweils verdoppeln.

[kyron7htx]

15,37$

-6,44%

unglaublich dieser Gesamtrückgang, völlig ungerechtfertigt.

Ein Schmock wer Böses denkt.

[enna2]

Scheint so als ob z.Z. fast 15 Mio Shares leerverkauft wurden...
http://www.shortsqueeze.com/index.php?symbol=frpt

Ich weiss nicht wie aktuell diese Anzeige ist, aber Anfang der letzten Woche waren es nur knapp 9 Mio.

Mal anders ausgedrückt sind über 20 % aller FRPT Shares momentan short...

[bregenzer]

Langsam aber sicher geht mir dieser Kursverlauf
ganz schön an die Nerven. Da nützt auch der schon
seit Wochen obligatorische "Remy Martin" nichts
mehr.

Entäuscht bin ich vom FRPT-Management. Ein Kurverlust
von 50% und keine (Null) Reaktion!!!
Das sollte man doch ewas hinterfragen.
:O

[microby]

stimmt, OTC Zeiten sind ja nun bei der Börse vorbei

[Highnoon120]

hier sieht man auch nur noch rot, verdammt. Ich nehm ne schlaftablette und guck in 3 Monaten wieder rein

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.943.873 von Highnoon120 am 30.07.07 22:39:38

wäre keine gute idee könnte dann bei 8 usd stehen!!

immer aufpassen!!!!

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.939.931 von kyron7htx am 30.07.07 17:51:42

naja die 15 usd passt schon charttechnisch... frag mich nur wohin der nächste move geht... tippe schnelle 25 bei der shortquote sind ja bald 100% short

[wohinistmeinGeld]

war doch heute nicht schlecht, nicht mal 10 % Minus, das ist doch schon einer der besseren Tage.

[coolrunning]

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15837275?q=frpt



running

[MCMLXVIII]

Hallo,

kann mal jemand sagen was brasi zu alldem sagt?

Konnte keine Einschätzung weiter finden oder ist er noch im Urlaub oder gar ganz ausgestiegen?

[pagitz01]

ich denke das geht noch ein stöckchen tiefer bevors wieder richtung 25 usd geht!!!!

es wird sicher nochmal einen kleien sell off in die region von 12-13 usd geben und wenns dann noch nicht aufhört is was faul!!!!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.948.869 von pagitz01 am 31.07.07 12:20:24

na nun wollen wir es mal nicht übertreiben

ich denke 15 $ ist der boden, sowie charttechnisch als auch mental.

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.949.172 von mc-plop am 31.07.07 12:40:09

kleine wette das wir diese woche einmal 13 vor dem komma sehen werden!!!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.949.969 von pagitz01 am 31.07.07 13:33:00

wir werden sehen...

Scheint heute wohl ein 6-monatiger Rekordumsatz in Frankfurt zu werden

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.948.751 von MCMLXVIII am 31.07.07 12:12:14

Im Biophan Thread hat er sich vor 3 Tagen gemeldet. Ansonsten weiß ich nur, daß er geschrieben hat (Anfang Juli war es glaub ich) daß er die Hälfte verkauft hat.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.950.115 von mc-plop am 31.07.07 13:42:15

da haben wir ja schon vor eröffnung usa ein rekordvolumen in frankfirt !

da bin ich ja auf den start in usa gespannt wenn hier schon umgerechnet 16,23 $ gezahlt werden.

[PEKA62]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.951.057 von mc-plop am 31.07.07 14:43:17

In US werden im Moment 15.61 $ bezahlt.

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.951.109 von PEKA62 am 31.07.07 14:46:45

+

was is hier für eine aufregung!!!

is ja nix

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=98489&pt=m…

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/Armored_Vehicles_Procur…

running

[carpediem2]

Hallo Pagitz, meinst Du mit 13 den € oder den $,
Meiner bescheidenen Meinung noch ist hier eher die € eher drin.
Konsolidierung scheint beendet, jetzt noch ein paar kurstreibende News und wir sind hier schnell wieder bei stabilen 20€, nun wir werden sehen

[coolrunning]

Wir steigen erst wieder wenn DollarPenny mit seiner Weissagung kommt:

" Heute bestimmt auf 20 $ "




running

[coolrunning]

http://defense.iwpnewsstand.com/insider.asp?issue=07312007

running

[coolrunning]

Das ist wohl auch der Grund warum es jetzt wieder anzieht !

bid ask Ungleichgewicht ...

Und up....


running

[Mr.Perfect]

@pagitz

Du und die Wetten,.....

ich weiss noch, als ich wieder eingestiegen bin und dann bei 24$ wieder ausgestiegen bin. hab dort schon geschrieben dass es unter 20$ laufen könnte. wolltest mit mir noch wetten,....
hättest mal wieder 100 euronen verloren

egal, dem kurs würde es gut tun, wenn er sich mal für eine Zeit sich still bei rund 15$ halten könnte. danach sehe ich durchaus wieder potenzial nach oben.
mal ganz ehrlich, wenn man das management ansieht bzw. die news,....
es fehlen echt die aufträge, die fetten versteht sich.
owohl man eigentlich mehr als zufrieden sein kann wenn frpt für das laufende jahr rund 1 milliarde $ umsetzt. im vergleich zum vorjahr einfach nur genial!!!!
doch die börse will noch mehr.
bin mal gespannt ob wir uns endlich mal halten können.
könnte mir gut vorstellen, dass wir uns bis im august bis mitte september seitwärts bewegen. danach ausbruch etc. ihr kennt ja das spiel

ich persönlich würde mir die richtig fetten news für september / november aufbewahren. ab september haben wir dann auch wieder alle interessenten im boot. ich meine so wegen sommer-monate und urlaubszeit. sell on may wäre also auch bei frpt mehr als ideal gewesen,.....

nun, alles so meine gedanken,... locker flockig von der leber,... äh ich meine von den fingern

c-ya
mr.perfect

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.955.095 von coolrunning am 31.07.07 18:38:25

Na bis lang lag ich immer richtig. Bei Deinen kommentarlosen copy n' paste ist niemanden so recht geholfen. Aber machmal weiter so, irgend wann wirst Du das auch merken.

[illi1]

Mittwoch, 1. August 2007
Zusätzliche Kriegskosten
Irak-Krieg wird immer teurer

Das Weiße Haus hat beim US-Kongress zusätzlich 5,3 Milliarden Dollar (3,9 Milliarden Euro) für die Anschaffung neuer Militärfahrzeuge beantragt, die die Soldaten im Irak besser gegen Bomben schützen sollen. Bereits bewilligt sind 5,6 Milliarden Dollar (4,1 Milliarden Euro) für den Kauf von 6.400 minensicherer Fahrzeuge. Die neue Forderung ist nicht in den 141,7 Milliarden Dollar (103 Milliarden Euro) enthalten, die das Pentagon für die Militäreinsätze in Irak und Afghanistan für das am 1. Oktober beginnende Haushaltsjahr veranschlagt.

[illi1]

Kein schneller Abzug

Der designierte Chef-Militärberater von US-Präsident George W. Bush machte sich derweil dafür stark, die US-Truppen noch Jahre im Irak zu belassen. Ein schneller Abzug würde das Land in einen Hexenkessel verwandeln, sagte Michael Mullen am Dienstag. "Ich glaube, wir werden dort noch jahrelang und nicht monatelang sein." Möglicherweise werde es drei bis vier Jahre dauern, bis die derzeitige Zahl von US-Soldaten in dem Golfstaat halbiert werden könne.

Der stellvertretende Verteidigungsminister Gordon England räumte zudem vor dem Haushaltsausschuss des Repräsentantenhauses ein, dass der Irak-Krieg in kommenden Jahr teurer werde als geplant. Die von der Regierung beantragte Summe von knapp 142 Milliarden Dollar werde überschritten.

Die US-Demokraten im Senat wollen die amerikanischen Soldaten aus den Irak bis April 2008 abziehen, sind damit aber bislang gescheitert. Zuletzt häuften sich zudem die Stimmen im Lager der Republikaner, die die Irak-Strategie der Regierung - wie auch die Mehrheit der US-Bürger - offen ablehne

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.963.441 von illi1 am 01.08.07 10:37:50

Der einzige, der den Abzug verhindert ist Bush, und der ist bald weg. Und kann dann überhaupt noch was schlimmer werden, kaum vorstellbar. Man sieht es ja an Afghanistan das es dort schlimmer wird desto länger die Amis drin sind.

[kyron7htx]

15:46:03 771200 Stck in einem Block

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.968.081 von kyron7htx am 01.08.07 15:48:25

Die letzten Wochen sind einige dicke Blöcke über den Tisch gegangen. Oft sogar nachbörslich.

Da wird entweder fett eingekauft, oder wir kommen der Übernahme näher.

Auf jeden Fall ist etwas im Busch !

Ich bleibe long and strong. Es hat sich nichts geändert.

Am gespanntesten bin ich auf die Margen, wenn die nächsten Zahlen kommen.
Denn die werden auch den Kurs beeinflussen....

running

[illi1]

Force Protection, Inc. Awarded $5.3 Million Contract For New ILAV Vehicles and Equipment
Ticker Symbol: U:FRPT


LADSON, S.C. -- (Business Wire) --


Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT) today announced it has

received work totaling $5.3 million to produce more than 40

articulating interrogation arms for the Iraqi Light Armored Vehicle

(ILAV). As part of this award, a total of 22 additional new vehicles

will also be produced at the Ladson, SC facility. Deliveries are

scheduled for December 2007.



¶ Used to detect and remove suspected explosive threats, the

articulated arm will be integrated into existing ILAV vehicles

produced by BAE Land & Armament Systems as prime contractor and Force

Protection as subcontractor. An award for 378 ILAVs was received in

May 2006 to support the U.S. Army's training and mission transition

efforts with Iraqi armed forces.



¶ "This contract represents an important component of Force

Protection's operations," said Force Protection CEO Gordon McGilton.

"We have always been committed to the continuing innovation and

enhancement of our counter-IED technology. We are pleased with the

opportunity to provide additional equipment that will expand upon the

capabilities of the ILAV and provide needed protection for the new

Iraqi ground forces."



¶ The ILAV is based on the proven design of the Cougar vehicle

produced by Force Protection, which has been deployed in Iraq and

Afghanistan since 2004. The first ILAVs were delivered to Iraq 90 days

after the contract was awarded.



¶ Force Protection is a leading ballistics research and

manufacturing enterprise, specializing in the development and

production of highly reinforced armored personnel carriers that are

designed to save soldiers' lives by shielding them from the deadly

effects of roadside bombs, or IEDs, which have become a leading killer

of U.S. troops in Iraq. The trucks' unique, V-shaped hull is designed

to deflect the force of IED blasts away from the vehicle, keeping

soldiers inside safe and alive, and have become the proven response to

an emerging global threat to U.S. troops. Its leading models include

the 23 ton "Buffalo", a uniquely-designed mine clearance vehicle with

a reinforced mechanical arm, and the family of "Cougar" vehicles, both

of whose mine and ballistic protection capabilities are among the most

advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside

Charleston, S.C. Visit the company's website at

www.forceprotection.net.



¶ This release contains forward-looking statements, including,

without limitation, statements concerning our business, future plans

and objectives and the performance of our products. These

forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties

ultimately may not prove to be accurate. Actual results and future

events could differ materially from those anticipated in such

statements. The company cautions that these forward looking statements

are further qualified by factors including, but not limited to, those

set forth in the company's Form 10-K filing and other filings with the

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (available at

http://www.sec.gov) and the company's public statements. The company

undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any statements

in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events

or otherwise, except as required by law.
Contacts:

Media Contact:

Policy Impact Communications

Jeff Child, 202-737-5339

[kyron7htx]

Deshalb der Block

[Highnoon120]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.964.525 von wohinistmeinGeld am 01.08.07 11:41:45

Is ja auch kein wunder wenn man den leuten dort mit bomben die Demokratie beibringen will. Die Aktion im Irak is für die Amis glaub ich das Blamabelste seit dem Vietnamkrieg. Total Blauäugig und Naiv da einzumarschieren den lieben gott nen guten mann sein zu lassen und die Bevölkerung sich selbst zu überlassen. Diese Politik is genauso bescheuert wie der jetzige Presi aussieht. Irgendwie erinnert der mich immer an einen Pavian wenn er da so steht und grosse Reden schwingt
Aber der Ausstattung mit dem Neuen Fahrzeug sollte selbst nach dem Abzug aus dem Irak nichts im Wege stehen denke ich mal

[diver47]

die amis wissen wohl mehr als wir ?

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.968.438 von illi1 am 01.08.07 16:07:26

ein wirklich kleiner auftrag, der bestätigt dass FRPT noch aufträge kriegt (der markt sah es wohl anders )
sowas haben wir gebraucht. 15 usd war auch charttechnisch sauber. das war sie wohl, die konsolidierung. denke es geht mit der zeit ruhiger weiter und wird um die 20 pendeln. das reicht mir schon fürs erste. hauptsache der chart wird wieder hübscher

[Barde69]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.973.574 von Boersenkrieger am 01.08.07 22:00:29

Hallo,

der Auftrag von heute war selbstverständlich nicht die Ursache für den über zehnprozentigen Anstieg.

Das hier war es meines Erachtens:


The DOD last night released a 270 + page solicitation on Mrap 1 and mrap2. 20,000 vehicles to be order in each each year over 6 years, 270,000 total vehicles and 70 billion for the program ,they want efp protection and testing to begin soon and orders to follow on ones that pass



270,000!!! Fahrzeuge, die EFP-sicher sind. Wie viele Lösungen gibt es derzeit am Markt? Warum rüstet FPI wie bekloppt auf und investiert in neue Produktionsstätten???

Viel Spaß weiterhin mit der Aktie!

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.974.663 von Barde69 am 01.08.07 22:57:39

aha das klingt schon interessanter.... wobei ich denke ne psychologische wirkung hatte der miniauftrag trotzdem. in kombination kann man nun die konso abhaken

[DollarPenny]

13€

its super!

[coolrunning]

Sehr ausführlich:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2007-08-01-force-prote…

running

[DollarPenny]

Kurs ist ideal zum nachlegen!

[fragmatiker]

Hi Leute, mal eine kleine Frage am Rande. Was macht ihr eigentlich mit euren Aktien wenn ihr in den Urlaub fahrt. Vor allem zur zeit sind die Märkte ja sehr nervös und FRPT ziemlich volatil. Bin nächste Woche in Ägypten und habe dort wahrscheinlich keinen Zugriff aufs Internet.
Bin vor FRPT überzeugt und weiß nicht so recht ob ich einen SL setzen soll falls die ganzen Märkte abschmieren.
Wie handhabt ihr das?

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.973.574 von Boersenkrieger am 01.08.07 22:00:29

der chart wird erst wieder ab >20$ "hübscher". alles unter 20$ ist immer noch schön im abwärtstrend drin.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[carpediem2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.982.376 von fragmatiker am 02.08.07 12:23:03

Tja, ging mir auch so, habe einen SL gesetzt, 2000K bei 16...immerhin stand die Aktie bei ca. 17, Verkauf wurde zu 15,50 von der Börse Stuttgartveranlasst, als ich wieder schauen konnte stand die Aktie über 18 und ist in den Folgetagen über 20€ gegangen.
Werde nie mehr so´nen idiotischen Fehler machen....die Broker spielen nur mit solchen Infos und kaufen sich da selber billig ein...(meine bescheidene Meinung)
Würde vieleicht nur einen Teil sichern...
Setz doch besser eine nette Verkaufsorder auf 25€ und freu Dich, wenn Du aus dem Urlaub kommst.....In Hurgada gibts übrigens neben abgerockten Lux.Hotels und Fisch auch Internet.

[coolrunning]

Es geht weiter Leute....

Nachbörslich mal wieder ein 123000er Block

Irgendwer kauft ständig i.d. letzten Wochen ein... Speku Ende.

Da kommt noch was

Long and strong !

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.forceprotection.net/news/news_article.html?id=192

[Demolitionman]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.995.167 von coolrunning am 02.08.07 23:06:55

@cool,

so besonders gut hört sich das nicht an für FRPT....

Ich lasse mich mal überraschen, aber es ist nie gut wenn man nicht pünktlich liefern kann...

Grüsse
Demo

[DollarPenny]

der Kurs geht rauf!

Kaufdruck entsteht wieder.

Its super!

[coolrunning]

Spartan Chassis Receives $28 Million Subcontract to Supply Chassis Components for High Priority MRAP Vehicle Production

CHARLOTTE, Michigan, August 3, 2007 - Spartan Chassis, Inc., a subsidiary of Spartan Motors, Inc. (Nasdaq: SPAR), today announced it has received a $28 million subcontract order from General Dynamics Land Systems to supply and integrate key chassis components in the production of advanced tactical vehicles under the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected, or MRAP, program.

The vehicles under this order are scheduled to be completed by the end of November 2007 and will be utilized by all branches of the U.S. military. MRAPs are prized by the military for their V-shaped hulls, raised chassis and improved armor, which help protect servicemen and women from improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, mines and other hazards of war.

"This award is validation of Spartan's expertise in automotive integration and our ability to deliver a quality product on time," said Richard Schalter, president of Spartan Chassis. "These vehicles have been called the highest priority for the U.S. military because of the unmatched level of troop safety they provide, and we are honored to be among the suppliers committed to providing products that safeguard the lives of our servicemen and women."

General Dynamics Land Systems, headquartered in Sterling Heights, Michigan, is a wholly owned subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE: GD). The company designs and builds armored vehicles and subsystems for the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, and international customers, and is the defense industry's largest supplier of armored military vehicles.

About Spartan Chassis, Inc.:

Spartan Chassis, Inc., a subsidiary of Spartan Motors, Inc. (Nasdaq: SPAR), is a leading developer and manufacturer of custom chassis for recreational vehicles, fire trucks and specialty vehicles. Spartan Motors, which also manufactures emergency rescue vehicles under the brand names of Crimson Fire, Crimson Fire Aerials and Road Rescue, reported sales of $445 million in 2006 and is focused on becoming the premier manufacturer of specialty vehicles and chassis in North America.

This release contains forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning our business, future plans and objectives and the performance of our products. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that ultimately may not prove to be accurate. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Technical complications may arise that could prevent the prompt implementation of the plans outlined above. The company cautions that these forward-looking statements are further qualified by other factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in the company's Form 10-K filing and other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (available at http://www.sec.gov). Government contracts and subcontracts typically involve long payment and purchase cycles, competitive bidding, qualification requirements, delays or changes in funding, extensive specification development and changes, price negotiations and milestone requirements. An announced award of a governmental contract is not equivalent to a finalized executed contract and does not assure that orders will be issued and filled. Government agencies also often retain some portion of fees payable upon completion of a project and collection of contract fees may be delayed for long periods, which can negatively impact both prime contractors and subcontractors. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any statements in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.


running

[coolrunning]

White House wants $5.3B for MRAPs in 2008

By John T. Bennett - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Aug 3, 2007 9:45:52 EDT
The White House this week sent Congress a $5.3 billion wartime spending request, dollars that would be used to purchase 1,520 new mine-resistant vehicles and increase production capacity on the heavily armored trucks.

This latest request for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles is part of a White House push to deliver 8,000 MRAPs to the Iraq and Afghan theaters by May 2008, according to the request, which was sent to Capitol Hill on Tuesday. The Pentagon could eventually purchase up to 21,000 of the V-hulled platforms, defense officials have said.

“This request would provide the additional resources necessary to maximize the production of [MRAP] vehicles and rapidly field this capability to our service members in Iraq and Afghanistan,” President Bush wrote in a memo addressed to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

If the Bush administration’s plans are approved by Congress, the request would swell the 2008 Iraq supplemental spending measure to $147 billion, according to the president’s memo.

A 13-page packet from the Office of Management and Budget, which features a detailed breakdown of the $5.3 billion proposal, accompanied Bush’s memo. A copy of the president’s memo and the OMB package were obtained by Defense News.

Along with buying 1,520 of the new MRAP vehicles, Tuesday’s request would be used to purchase “government-furnished equipment, continued technological development,” upgrades, and “support and transportation” for vehicles bought for the services and U.S. Special Operations Command, states a memo included in the packet signed by OMB Chief Robert Portman.

The Bush administration would spread the proposed $5.3 billion over the four services, defensewide accounts and SOCom.

The package proposes:

* $1.4 billion for Army procurement coffers, which would be used to purchase 627 additional MRAPs.

* $2.4 billion for the Marine Corps, which would go for 632 new trucks.

* $568 million for Air Force accounts that would be tapped for 261 new MRAPs.

Those amounts would be used to purchase other MRAP-related items, such as equipment, upgrades, logistical support, “battle damage assessment” and repairs, according to the request documents.

If Congress approves, SOCom would get $131 million and the Navy would receive $55 million, but those funds apparently would not be used to buy any actual vehicles.

The procurement funds each service, and SOCom, would receive under the administration’s plan also would be used to “maximize production capacity and accelerate fielding” of the heavily armored vehicles, according to the request.

Some defense observers, however, question whether the U.S. industrial base can meet the administration’s goal of delivering 8,000 MRAPs to the Iraq and Afghan theaters by next May.

“It’s unlikely that the MRAP program,” under the Pentagon’s current plans, “can be completed this year without some industrial base problems,” said Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute.

Specifically, hardened steel and the large tires that are fitted on MRAP vehicles could be in short supply, Thompson said.

“It appears we’re approaching the outer edges” of domestic suppliers’ ability to meet the administration’s goals, he added.

The second-largest chunk of the requested funds, $748 million, would be used to transport the new vehicles to theater and perform support functions. Those dollars also would be scattered across various service, Pentagon and SOCom accounts, with the Marine Corps and Army getting the largest shares, a combined $620 million, according to the documents.

The request also seeks $30 million in research-and-development funds to continue studying how the vehicles can guard against improvised explosive devices. Those funds would be split between the Army ($20 million) and the Navy ($10 million), according to the documents.

In his memo to Pelosi, Bush calls the vehicles and other items that would be bought under Tuesday’s MRAP production request “urgent and essential requirements.” Bush also urges the speaker to take action on the 2008 war supplemental, including the $5.3 billion MRAP request, “as soon as possible.”

A reporter’s calls to several top Democrats’ offices to gather reaction to the $5.3 billion request had not yet been returned at the time of posting.

running

[coolrunning]

Es geht weiter mit dem nachbörslichen Riesenblock

Fast jeden Tag.... mmmhhh....

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
19:53 $ 17.74 670
19:29 $ 17.74 280
19:10 $ 17.74 100
17:31 $ 17.72 100
17:16 $ 17.74 400
17:13 $ 17.74 400
17:13 $ 17.8887 10,000
17:13 $ 17.74 500
16:46 $ 17.73 130
16:44 $ 18.085 178,700
16:14 $ 17.70 100
16:10 $ 18.087 5,600


Macht euch eure eigenen Gedanken darüber....

Ich bleibe long and strong... habe ja auch genug shares

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=99839&pt=m…

[coolrunning]

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2714578&C=europe

[carpediem2]

Hallo und guten Morgen,
werden wir diese Woche wieder über 20$ kommen???
Mein Kaffeesatzsatz sagt sogar 22$.....Probleme sieht der Kaffeesatz nur im fallenden Dollarkurs

Macht mir aber nix, ich verdiene Euro und zahl demnächst meine Tauchgänge in Dollar
Schöne grüne Woche an alle hier investierten

[coolrunning]

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
17:04 $ 18.20 100
16:32 $ 17.78 5,420
16:13 $ 17.7499 1,900
16:04 $ 18 40,000

Es geht weiter mit den nachbörslichen Blöcken....

720.000 $ ... auch nicht schlecht...

Long and strong...

running

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.072.407 von coolrunning am 07.08.07 23:18:13

Du scheinst hier einer der wenigen?? noch verbliebenen Optimisten zu sein---als "Ersatz" für brasi,der sich nicht mehr meldet?

[sauerback]

Kann Dir versichern, er ist nicht der einzige

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.072.744 von sauerback am 08.08.07 00:12:13

stimmt

...es ist nur so dass die vola nach dem gap-schluss bei 15 usd raus ist. von daher haben wir nun für ne weile ein friedliches gedümpel
...wurde auch zeit dass die aktie mal langweilig wird

[Gexe006]

Da sollten wir dann doch wohl auch die Hälfte abbekommen, oder sehe ich das falsch

Canadian Commercial Corp., General Dynamics Land Systems Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, is being awarded $338,734,800 for firm-fixed-priced delivery order # 0003 under previously awarded contract (M67854-07-D-5028) to purchase 600 Category (CAT) II Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) variation vehicles. MRAP vehicles are armored vehicles with a blast resistant underbody designed to protect the crew from mine blasts, fragmentary and direct fire weapons. Work will be performed in Lansing, Michigan, and work is expected to completed March 2008. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.073.194 von Gexe006 am 08.08.07 07:15:03

warum sollten sie?

Kam die Meldung nach Feieranbend, wird deshalb der Schlußanstieg gestern bei uns heute nicht mitgemacht und ist deshalb der Kurs heute 1 $ unter pari?

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.077.864 von wohinistmeinGeld am 08.08.07 12:59:25

nachbörslich ist der kurs bei 16.70 $

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.077.899 von pes05 am 08.08.07 13:01:58

Schlußkurs war 18,10, auf nachbörslich habe ich nicht geschaut, aber wenn die Meldung nachbörslich kam muß man muß man sich auch nicht wundern wenn es wieder mal richtig in den Keller geht.

[carpediem2]

Was hat denn diesen Kurseinbruch ausgelöst...ich verstehs nicht ... hat jemand eine Ahnung, was da los ist ????

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.083.321 von carpediem2 am 08.08.07 17:50:08

600 fahrzeuge an die konkurenz?
bleibt wohl nicht mehr soviel,.... beim nächsten auftrag an andere sell off?

Hoffentlich kommt hier noch eine big order!!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.083.321 von carpediem2 am 08.08.07 17:50:08

Ich verstehe die Frage nicht. Da steht doch 4 Beiträge zurück, daß wieder ein Auftrag vergeben wurde und Force leer ausgegangen ist, also ist es doch kein Wunder wenn es runter geht.

[Boersenkrieger]

http://www.forbes.com/2007/08/08/force-protection-armor-mark…

lest das mal...
das war ein unabhaengiger auftrag an gd.
letztlich hat frpt eben mal termine nicht eingehalten. das geht beim verteidigungsministerium eben nicht.
der abschlag im vergleich zur konkurrenz in der bewertung ist wohl gerechtfertigt.... vor ner weile wurde noch über den aufschlag diskutiert... abwarten und hoffen dass die 15 hält ansonsten auf die 10 hoffen.

[Highnoon120]

uiuiuiuiui, das sieht ganz schlecht aus

[meier1]

Eigentlich schade,dass sich Brasi--selbst in dieser für FRPT mißlichen Lage--nicht zu Wort meldet.

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.088.938 von meier1 am 09.08.07 00:39:54

ja, sehr sehr schade... er hat den besten überblick.... andererseits ist die sache klar.
es schien zunächst so als wäre FRPT DER MRAP-producer der keine konkurrenz hat da seine fahrzeuge die sichersten sind... inzwischen ist klar dass FRPT nur einer von mehreren ist.
positiv ist dass kapazitäten geschaffen werden und man das verteidigungministerium davon überzeugen wird schneller mehr produzieren zu können. also warum sollten sie keien aufträge mehr bekommen ? cheetah gibts zudem auch noch....
momentan hat frpt sogar einen abschlag erhalten siehe link von #7578. ich denke man wird sich in der mitte finden.... aber eine gewisse gefahr besteht nun natürlich dass der kurs nichtmal die 15 hält. dachte das wäre überstanden

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.089.019 von Boersenkrieger am 09.08.07 01:08:17

Ich befürchte,dass die 15 morgen nicht hält.

BRASI--lass uns deine Einschätzung vernehmen.

Wer sich auf RB am 6.8. zu BIPH äußert,dem kann doch FRPT nicht plötzlich egal sein???

[sauerback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.089.019 von Boersenkrieger am 09.08.07 01:08:17

Jaja, klar ohne Brasi geht es nicht, und er ist Schuld, dass viele keine 1000% gemacht haben. Also nur nach PR sind wir bis März nächsten Jahres ausgebucht, weshalb es weniger wichtig sein sollte, was wir dieses Jahr bekommen, als das was in den nächsten Jahren fließen wird. Man kauft ja nur zum Spaß alte Produktionsstätten auf, die lediglich die Produktion vervielfachen können. Darüberhinaus hat sich die Firma in ihrem Ursprung, glaub ich darauf versetzt, dass man auch mal ein V-shaped Patent aus Süd Afrika gekauft hat, insofern allen Kurzanlegern good bye und allen noch existenten gut Dollar.

[DollarPenny]

Freitag ist FRPT Tag, schon vergessen?

Shares gut fest halten.

[mc-plop]

Seeking Alpha -- Buying Opportunity for FRPT
http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/070808/43943_id.html?.v=1


Seeking Alpha
Force Protection Volatility Presents Unique Buying Opportunity
Wednesday August 8, 7:10 pm ET

Manny Otero submits: On June 27th, 2007, I wrote an article entitled, “What’s Causing Force Protection’s Price Volatility?, and presented the underlying thesis that FRPT’s business fundamentals were strong, and that the rapid decline in price from the $30s/share to the low $20s/share was entirely customer-driven (Department of Defense inability to provide MRAP orders).

Since that post, the price has continued to significantly decrease, to the mid-teens, reaching a low of just under $15/share. As recently as Tuesday, August 7, General Dynamics (NYSE: GD - News) was notified by the Pentagon that they were receiving a significant MRAP order - $338.7 million – causing FRPT shares to decline by as much as 11%.

In the interest of getting to the point as quickly as possible, let me submit the following reasons why Force Protection represents an excellent buying opportunity, particularly as the market continues to suffer at the hands of sub-prime mortgage concerns, lack-luster hedge-fund performance, and general fears over the ability to finance debt:

1. Force Protection fundamentals continue to be extremely strong. This is supported by the consistent increase in production capacity, culminating with the addition of a nearly 430,000 ft2 facility in Roxboro, NC, for the exclusive production of the Cheetah. This will be further affirmed by the upcoming earnings release, which I believe Force Protection will meet (Average Estimate: $0.13/share).

2. Force Protection’s share value should not be based on the number of orders won by other MRAP manufacturers. Rather, FRPT should be exclusively valued on the growth rate of their production capacity and ability to sell every single vehicle they can produce. This is what will ultimately drive earnings and profits, and consequently, the price per share. MRAP funding, particularly when one considers the separate programs dedicated towards Hummvee replacement, offers an enormous market which under no circumstances was Force Protection ever expected to exclusively dominate. However, ask yourself, “Is this market big enough to fuel FRPT’s accelerated growth rate and sales, even if other competitors receive market share?” The answer is a resounding yes.

3. When you see the tremendous volatility we are seeing across the broader market, you need to take a step back, and strongly consider a sector analysis. Even if individual equities within a given sector have strong fundamentals that warrant increased valuations, if the sector is viewed negatively, then it’s likely to be the dominant force. Under these market conditions, I think the defense sector represents a spectacular buying opportunity.

Specifically, this is because:

a. Defense spending continues to increase aggressively, with concerns that Democrats taking control of the White house will lead to severely decreased military spending now being refuted. Democrats, voiced through the likes of Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, acknowledge that immediately pulling out of Iraq is completely unrealistic. The best estimates conclude that even if the order is given to pull-out tomorrow, it will take a minimum of one year to remove all the forces. Furthermore, although there is military progress being made in Iraq, political progress continues to stagnate, meaning that it’s unlikely that US Commanders on the ground when they report to Congress in September will recommend any type of force reduction.

b. Defense spending, and in particular programs and discussions geared towards replacing the Hummvee, are not exclusively dictated by progress in Iraq or Afghanistan. Rather, this represents a long-term, cyclic commitment to upgrading a fundamental component of our over-all military readiness. With the performance of the Cheetah, the recent attention it has received from the Pentagon, and the expanding production capacity of FRPT, there is enormous potential for FRPT to dominate this multi-billion dollar market. Military readiness, on general terms, is very much a topic of discussion. In fact, the most recent issue of the Economist has an excellent article outlining the growing concern over China's increasing military readiness. With the expanding military readiness of both China and Russia, you can be assured that a fundamental component such as ground force transport and readiness will not be over-looked.

c. The defense sector is not sensitive to the present concerns over financing debt. In fact, defense companies, much like Proctor & Gamble (NYSE: PG - News), manufacture products that are required in both slowing and growing economics, and therefore present a great hedge against the current volatility. As the market volatility continues you should see the defense titans, such as Boeing (NYSE: BA - News) and Raytheon (NYSE: RTN - News), continue to grow their valuations.

There is no question that I never expected FRPT price levels to drop has heavily as they have, and this was probably due to an underestimation of the short pressure. However, if you’re in this for the long-term, then this should simply be viewed as a sale on FRPT shares. If you’ve got a fundamentally strong company, driven by growth in earnings and profits, in a fundamentally strong sector, which is made even stronger by the steep decline in other sectors, then you’ve got a winning stock. My gut tells me that if you\\'ve got some liquidity consider purchasing FRPT ahead of earnings, and particularly prior to September.

September represents likely additional MRAP contracts being awarded, and, a critical report from US Commanders in Iraq which could set the stage both for military spending, but also dominate the news rooms. FRPT should run back into the high $20s on any bullish news. Best of luck to all investors and traders, and as always, discussion and comments are always welcomed.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am private, novice investor, that holds 2025 shares of FRPT at a price entry level of ~$16/share. I have bought, and sold FRPT since it was $2/share. I look forward to hearing everyone's comment, shorts and longs. Only through discussion can we perform better analysis.

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.093.851 von DollarPenny am 09.08.07 12:58:34

was soll denn das blöde Geschwätz?
Rückblick bis Anfang Juli

jeweils Freitag
..6.7. von 24,49 gefallen auf 23,35
13.7. von 23,13 ---------------22,89
20.7. von 20,45 ---------------19,23
..3.8. von 18,10 ---------------17,73

Ausnahme 27.7 von 15,70 gestiegen auf 16,47

[simsalabam]

dem DollarPenny seins kann ich leider schon lange nicht mehr lesen

warum nur?

[coolrunning]

Posted 08/08/07 11:37Print this story Pentagon Seeks $750M to Fly MRAPs to Troops
BY TOM VANDEN BROOK, USA TODAY

The Pentagon has asked Congress for nearly $750 million to speed urgently needed armored vehicles to troops facing roadside bombs in Iraq, according to budget documents.
The emergency funding request would allow the military to fly many of the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles directly to troops, rather than taking weeks transporting them by ship.
The transportation money is part of an emergency request for $5.3 billion for the Pentagon’s MRAP program for the fiscal year beginning in October. Congress must appropriate the money. All told, the military seeks about $12 billion through 2008 for about 8,000 vehicles, whose raised chassis and V-shaped hulls protect troops against roadside bombs.John Young, who heads the Pentagon’s MRAP task force, has said as many as 3,500 MRAPs could be sent to Iraq by the end of 2007.
Michael O’Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution, blamed bad planning for the need to fly the vehicles to Iraq in the fifth year of the war. Pentagon leaders didn’t push for better-protected vehicles because they believed the war would be short, he said.
“It’s ridiculous that it took this long to send MRAPs,” O’Hanlon said. “It’s an example of wishfulness and politics getting in the way of protection for troops. It’s a bad mistake verging on the unconscionable.”
Pentagon officials, including Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Conway, have said military leaders sent MRAP vehicles to Iraq as quickly as they could. Conway has said insurgent tactics changed in 2006 and made MRAPs a better choice than armored Humvees. USA Today has reported that the Pentagon knew of MRAPs effectiveness in the early years of the war but was slow to seek them.
It costs seven times more to fly MRAPs to the war zone rather than send them by sea, accounting for much of the spending request. The military’s Transportation Command estimates that it costs $135,000 to fly an MRAP compared with $18,000 by ship.
“The most expeditious manner is to use airlift,” Pentagon spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin said. “Eventually, that will change and more will transport by ship than by plane.”
Some MRAPs are already being airlifted to Iraq. The emergency request would fund the delivery of the vehicles as quickly as they are produced. They are flown from Charleston Air Force Base, S.C., after being outfitted with electronics at a nearby Navy facility.
House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, D-S.C., said flying the vehicles is costly but justified. Shipping them can take weeks.
“The troops deserve it,” Spratt said.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made the MRAP program the Defense Department’s top priority. He recently said the Pentagon would fly them to Iraq to get them to troops as quickly as possible.
President Bush singled out the MRAP program in a July 31 letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urging her to support $147 billion in war funding. In revising his defense budget request, Bush wrote that the $5.3 billion in emergency MRAP spending was “necessary to maximize the production of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles and rapidly field this capability to our service members in Iraq and Afghanistan.”The House of Representatives did not include war funding in the $459.6 billion defense budget bill approved Sunday morning. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., chairman of the defense appropriations committee, has said the House will take up a separate war spending bill in September.
Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., a member of the House Budget Committee, said he supported the Pentagon’s request for cash to rush MRAPs to Iraq.
“Whatever gets our guys into something safer faster is the right way to go,” Ryan said.

running

[Boersenkrieger]

Hier steht im wesentlichen drin daß Force Protection so ziemlich im Eimer ist und dass GD sein eigenes Ding dreht und letztlich auh andere konkurrenten daneben stehen werden.
der letzte kontrakt war bereits MRAP 2. GD verkauft deutlich billiger und hat sich wohl eingeschmeichelt... sehr negativer Artikel für FRPT und sehr nachvollziehbar

http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2007/08/09/oops-ge…


Schlussatz allerdings:
würde ja echt gerne lesen warum FRPT ein long-term-winner werden sollte, vor allem paßt das nun kein bischen zum Artikel

Does Force Protection have an ace in the hole that could turn the entire scenario described above upside down -- and make the stock a long-term winner against all odds? The lads at Motley Fool Rule Breakers think so. Take a free 30-day trial to the service, read their write-up on the company, and find out what Force Protection has up its sleeve

[coolrunning]

Nachbörslich auf 15,20 $.....

Gute Nacht

running

[wohinistmeinGeld]

dieser Kauf damals im Frühjahr für 70 Mio$, ich weiß nicht mehr zu welchem Kurs das war, aber wenn das nahe beim Höchststand war muß da einer 35 Mio$ Buchverlust aushalten.

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.107.560 von wohinistmeinGeld am 10.08.07 00:17:19

naja vielleicht hat er inzwischen scheibchenweise wieder verkauft... aber da sieht man halt mal wieder dass viele große auch oft mistbauen..

nachbörslich 15,40 usd... recht stabil über 15 ...also wieder die unterstützung. allmälich hat man sich wohl an die situation gewöhnt.

würde nur gerne wissen was "fool" noch so stark an diesem wert findet.. ist da keiner zufällig angemeldet ? im free-text haben sie frpt ja fast zerrissen und für´s anmelden kann man dann lesen warum frpt ein ass im ärmel hat und als long-term für gut befunden wird

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.107.708 von Boersenkrieger am 10.08.07 00:33:18

Auf die "dicken" Käufe gebe ich gar nichts, wenn einer für 70 Mio kauft muß auch irgendwo für 70 verkauft worden sein, und wer weiß jetzt besser bescheid?
Nur wenn die Käufe nicht über den Markt laufen kann man darauf was geben, z.B bei neu ausgegeben Aktien die direkt von einem Insti genommen werden.

Das ist aber nur meine persönliche laienhafte Meinung und muß nicht unbedingt richtig sein.

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.107.759 von wohinistmeinGeld am 10.08.07 00:43:30

ja stimmt schon...
nur wenn einer einen riesenblock reinstellt der peu a peu mit kleineren verkaufsorders bedient wird kann man schon asgen dass das positiv ist nur ist es heutzutage ja so dass grad die großen oft nur trader sind und nach ein paar tagen hauen sie es zu +5% wieder raus

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.107.759 von wohinistmeinGeld am 10.08.07 00:43:30

Deine Meinung ist durchaus richtig ...

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.107.708 von Boersenkrieger am 10.08.07 00:33:18

Force Protection Reports Record Second Quarter and Six Month 2007 Financial Results


2007-08-09 17:51 ET - News Release


LADSON, S.C., Aug. 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Force Protection , today announced results for its second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007.

Net sales for the second quarter of 2007 rose 140% to $134.7 million, compared to net sales of $56.1 million for the second quarter of 2006. Net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 were $234.9 million, compared to $90.9 million for the first six months of 2006, a 158% increase. The primary reason for the increase in sales was due to the improving production capability leading to increased deliveries and sales of its Cougar and Buffalo vehicles.

For the second quarter gross profit was $32.8 million, or 24.3% of net sales, compared to a gross profit of $10.2 million, or 18.1% of net sales for the second quarter of 2006. As a percentage of net sales gross margin increased 6.2% over second quarter 2006. Gross profit for the first six months of 2007 was $55.3 million, or 23.5% of net sales, compared to a gross profit of $16.8 million, or 18.5% of net sales for the first six months of 2006. As a percentage of net sales gross margin increased 5.0% for the first six months of 2007, compared to the same period last year. The gross profit increase for the second quarter and six month period was primarily due to improved material and labor costs and the Company's increased ability to leverage fixed costs as it continues to expand its production capability.

Research and development (R&D) expenses increased 416% to $3.3 million, compared to $641,215 for second quarter 2006. For the first six months of 2007, R&D rose 524% to $8.1 million, compared to $1.3 million for the first six months of 2006 primarily due to continued development of the Cheetah vehicle. The company previously announced the acquisition of an additional facility for the manufacture of current and future products including the Cheetah and expects the production capacity to be approximately 2,000 Cheetah vehicles in 2008 as previously stated.

Expansion efforts continue and are on track to provide increased capacity at our facilities in Ladson, SC, Roxboro, NC and the various facilities within our enterprise which will enable us to meet previously stated production capacity within our operations.

The Company recorded an operating profit of $13.9 million for the quarter, compared to an operating profit of $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2006. Operating profit was $16.5 million for the first half of 2007, compared to an operating profit of $1.8 million for the first half of 2006.

Income after taxes for the second quarter was $9.6 million, compared to income after taxes of $973,024 for the same quarter last year, a 889% increase. For the six month period ended June 30, 2007, the Company reported income after taxes of $12.1 million, compared to income after taxes of $205,575 for the first six months of 2006.

Net income for the quarter rose 2,170% to $9.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, compared to net income of $424,047 or $0.01 per diluted share for the same period last year. Net income for the six month period was $12.1 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $(989,267) or $(0.03) per diluted share for the same period last year. The Company incurred a $1.7 million charge for the late registration of the private placement during the second quarter 2007, or $0.025 per diluted share. Excluding this charge, EPS would have been $0.17 per share. As earlier announced, the S-3 filing was declared effective on July 26, 2007.

Gordon McGilton, Chief Executive Officer of Force Protection commented, "We are most pleased with our results for the second quarter having realized significant increases in net sales, net income and gross profit. At the same time, we produced 229 vehicles in the second quarter compared to 285 vehicles in all of 2006."

"We were also pleased to have signed several additional contracts during the quarter in connection with our joint venture with General Dynamics. During the quarter, we announced that we had been awarded contracts totaling $711 million to produce 1,455 vehicles for the U.S Marine Corps' Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle program.

As previously announced, we received our first Canadian contract for approximately $8.9 million to produce five Buffalo and five Cougar mine- protected vehicles for the Canadian Expeditionary Force Command (CEFCOM). We recently delivered the first of these vehicles to the Canadian forces."

Subsequent Events

On July 20, 2007, we entered into an Agreement with Wachovia Bank for a revolving credit facility of $50,000,000. We entered into this agreement to assure continued flow of cash while administrative contractual payment issues are worked out with government payment offices on recently established MRAP programs.

On August 1st, 2007, the Company announced a contract for approximately $5.3 million for continued work under the Iraqi Light Armored Vehicle (ILAV) program for new ILAV vehicles and equipment to include 22 new vehicles and more than 40 articulating interrogating arms.

Mr. McGilton concluded, "The progress that we have made to date in 2007 positions us for a successful year. As noted, we are continuing to see strong demand for our vehicles. We are also realizing the benefits of improved materials and labor costs and a reduction in our fixed costs. Most importantly we remain committed to our mission to make vehicles that protect and save lives by making sure that those vehicles are available to our troops in a timely manner."

For further information, interested parties are encouraged to review Force Protection's latest 10-Q filing with the SEC, which can be accessed via the Internet at http://www.forceprotection.net/investors/sec.html.

About Force Protection Inc.

Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such as "believe," "may," "could," "will," "intend," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in expectations, except as required by law.

Force Protection



CONTACT: Tommy Pruitt, Director, Force Protection, [phone] x 335;
Investors: Julie Tu, [phone] x200, Media: Tom Corbett, +1-312-

[illi1]

schaut doch gar net so übel aus!!

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.108.025 von illi1 am 10.08.07 02:59:23

Its super!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.108.025 von illi1 am 10.08.07 02:59:23

Na die Zahlen sind ja wirklich super:

- Rekordumsatz von 134,7 Mio $

- Anstieg der Marge auf 24,3 %

- Net income von 9,6 Mio $

- 0,17 $ eps (ohne late registration charge)

- 229 Vehicle produced

Damit könnte der GD Schock verdaut werden und die Rakete back to the 20´s $ starten.

[enna2]

Na vielleicht helfen die Zahlen mal das Ruhe in den Kurs kommt.
Gut genug sind sie dafür allemal:

"Net income for the quarter rose 2,170% to $9.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, compared to net income of $424,047 or $0.01 per diluted share for the same period last year."

Allerdings werden auch die besten Zahlen sich nicht gegen den Gesamtmarkt stemmen können.Was wir also bräuchten wäre ein richtig grüner Tag in Amerika.Aber ehrlich gesagt bezweifel ich das ein wenig...

[coolrunning]

Hier der Kommentar:
Force Protection, Inc, Comments on Results
One of the largest balance sheet changes is inventories. The largest inventory components are raw materials and supplies which is now $130 million – an increase of over $90 million in the last 6 months. Another interesting component of inventory is finished goods which are $11,638,699. This component would account for as many as 20 Cougars that are built but not yet inspected and accepted by the government. Force Protection didn’t have any finished goods at the end of either of the last two quarters.

In Q2, Force Protection reported delivering 17 Buffalo and 212 Cougar. They reported delivering late 12 MRAP vehicles due to an issue with providing parts to one of their production partners. If those vehicles were added to the 212 cougars and the finished goods added as well, this would indicate that actual production of 244 Cougars was possible during Q2. A ramp-up of 70 vehicles in April, 80 in May and 90 in June would add up to 240 vehicles. Therefore, in July, it is reasonable to assume that Force protection is making 100 or more Cougars per month.

Accounts receivable increased by $61,461,091. Part of the increase is simply due to an increase in production. But most is due to the $45 million in past due payments from the government. The past due payments are caused by the rapid growth in the MRAP program and the military getting the administrative and contractual payment issues solved with the new program. This also explains the need for the $50,000,000 loan which is in place while the government gets their funding issues solved.

Force Protection continues to report backlog that includes all MRAP vehicles including that which would be expected to go to the Joint Venture partner General Dynamics. This is perhaps explained, “For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 the joint venture had no activity as the MRAP contract has not been novated to the joint venture.” There could be any of a hundred reasons for this.

My preferred but perhaps unlikely explanation is that GDLS is not living up to all the terms of the Joint Venture and the Joint Venture will be ended. One of the terms of the Joint Venture as described in the 10Q, “The Company agreed to operate the joint venture on the principle of equitable division of burden and benefit with GDLS. This means that parties are expected to contribute resources equally to the venture.” How is this “principle” of equitable division of burden and benefit measured? From Force Protection’s point of view, is GDLS actually living up to their expectation? If GDLS is not living up to expectation, what is the remedy? Without some comment from the company, there is really no way to tell.

The nicest part of the earnings report for me is the upwards trend in margin. As sales increases, margin is increasing with it. In the last six months, gross margin has increased five percent. This is the primary reason that Force Protection exceeded average analyst expectation and net income after taxes was $9.6 million for a $0.14 per diluted share. Without the liquidated damages of $1.7 million for the registration delay for the private placement shares, the EPS would have been $0.17 per share. That is above even the highest analyst estimate for the quarter.

In 2006, Force Protection’s revenue was approximately $198 million dollars and they manufactured 285 vehicles. This last quarter, Force Protection delivered 229 vehicles to the military. The manufacturing ramp-up will continue all year and therefore, it is reasonable to expect that Force Protection will manufacture approximately four times as many vehicles in 2007 as it did in 2006. This will result in very good operating results for the company.

Das Ergebnis ist wirklich super !
Ich hatte vor mehreren Wochen schon geschrieben, dass die Marge besser werden müßte. Dies ist geschehen und wird viele Analysten positiv stimmen.
Abzüglich dieser dämlichen Strafe von 1,7 Mio haben wir also
$0.17 pro aktie.
Das die Wachstumsraten die nächsten 10 Jahre nicht in dem Tempo weitergehen ist allen klar.
Die kommenden 2 Jahre aber bestimmt.
In 2006 produzierte Force 285 Fahrzeuge - im letzten Quartal allein 229 Fahrzeuge !
Es wird also eine Vervierfachung der Auslieferung in 2007 angenommen und die dementsprechenden Resultate in Umsatz und Marge.
Die goldenen Monate kommen erst noch und das hat dann nicht mehr viel mit Fantasie zu tun, sondern mit Fakten

Es werden weitere Aufträge kommen, denn FRPT liefert die besten Fahrzeuge, das ist unbestritten. Lieferprobleme dürfen nicht mehr vorkommen. Die Aufträge und Vergabe an Mitbewerber war auch ein deutliches Zeichen zu zwei Punkten:
1. Wir dulden keine Verzögerungen
2. Wer schnell liefern kann und die nötigen Produktions- und Lieferkapazitäten besitzt, wird bevorzugt, auch wenn die Fahrzeuge nur an Nummer zwei oder drei gesehen werden, denn das leben unserer Soldaten hat Priorität.

Wie sieht die Zukunft aus:

Force wird keinen 60 - 70 %igen Anteil bekommen, wie manche Visionäre geträumt haben und den Kurs in überzogene Höhen treiben wollten.
FRPT wird aber ein marktführendes Unternehmen werden, denn die Produkte besitzen die größte Anerkennung seitens der Spezialisten.

Wenn der Cheetah so einschlägt, wie Fachleute es vermuten, dann sind Kurse von 30-40 Dollar anhand von Fakten drin !
Die ungeschützen beweglichen Fahrzeuge müssen kurz- und mittelfristig ersetzt werden und der Cheetah ist meines Wissens die beste Alternative.

Eine Übernahme wird kommen, da bin ich mir sicher.
Egal wann - wir werden mindestens Kurse um 30 Dollar wiedersehen...

... und das ist konservativ geschätzt.

Dies ist keine Kaufempfehlung, sondern nur meine Meinung.

Ein schönes WE allen Interessierten.

running

[coolrunning]

FRPT has purchased all of the steel neccesary for all existing contracts and some future work. That is a substantial part of the 145k in inventory. It means the cash has already been spent, the steel is in hand. I think quarter 3 and 4 are going to be very good, indeed.

Keine Lieferverspätungen mehr
Erhöhung der Produktion/fertiggestellten Fahrzeuge


= neue Aufträge

[Highnoon120]

Hm Nochmal nachlegen jetzt

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.112.237 von Highnoon120 am 10.08.07 12:12:55

wie mans macht, macht man es falsch, kommt wie gewöhnlich auf den Zeithorizont an.
gruss pes05

[Highnoon120]

Aber wird über Pari gehandelt, da warten wir doch erst mal US ab.
Pari wäre 10,43

[BR101]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.089.039 von meier1 am 09.08.07 01:19:53

moin meier und alle anderen,

bin seit 4 tagen aus dem urlaub zurück und hatte wenig lust in diesem umfeld überhaupt zu posten. ab und zu mal auf IV, wenn ich im netcafe mails oder kurse checkte.
vorgestern und gestern habe ich sogar im cafe gesessen (neben chattenden kids) und meine transaktionsnummern ausgepackt und gekauft. die kids staunten nicht schelcht, als quotestream im vollbildmodus auf dem montor stand. einige dachten sicher an ein neues online spiel bei dem geflacker...

nun denn,was lernt ein alter OTC hase, wenn er einen stock an die NAS begleitet? zunächst einmal, dass die shorts dort power haben, eine schmerzvolle erfahrung. während an der OTC die retails immer wieder für squeezes sorgen, weil die herde rein emotional gepolt ist, sitzten an der NAS shorts und hedgies, die offensichtlich keine probleme damit haben, mal so eben 200, 300 millionen in risc zu gehen. sie haben die finanzielle feuerkraft und ihre medien (siehe cramer, melissa und weisel) und ganz offensichtlich auch sehr gute quellen in richtung DoD und wettbewerber.

ich bin ehrlich: habe nicht mit diesem nachdruck der shorts gerechnet und war ziemlich frustriert über die sprachlosigkeit des managements. heute sehe ich das etwas anders und denke, dass dam management durchaus bewusst war, dass dies eine massive attacke war und PR gewiesel vielleicht sogar das gegenteil bewirkt hätte. vielleicht verfolgen sie deshalb das motto "lasst zahlen sprechen", mindestens alle drei monate. und vielleicht ist das wirklich die richtige nummer, an die sich die NAS boys eben gewöhnen werden nach dem motto "wenn die company nichts sagt, ist alles in butter". ungewöhnlich aber durchaus auch eine strategie, wir werden´s sehen in den kommenden wochen.

die zahlen ssehen super aus. ich finde es wunderbar, dass wir 140mio an inventory haben, also material zum bau fast aller fahrzeuge, engpässe, die durch die bestellungen der wettbewerber entstehen könnten, haben wir aktuell nicht zu befürchten und können mittelfristig für den cheetah und kommende cougar aufträge ordern. eine schöne position der stärke.

das eps sähe ohne die PP strafe noch besser aus und hätte das DoD die 12 fertigen fahrzeuge noch abgenommen, stünden weitere 2,5 cent eps an, also dass rund 20 cent. tolles ergebnis. so werden diese 12 cougars dem kommenden quartal zugerechnet, was luft gibt und das sehen sicher auch die seriösen analysten so.

die tests für die die leichteren fahrzeuge mit den neuen spezifikationen/anforderungen stehen für september an und wir wisen, dass frpt die erforderlichen 17 fahrzeuge hat, im gegensatz zu den wettbewerbern, die derzeit mit dem aufbau von kapazitäten voll und ganz beschäftigt sind. ich bin deshalb sicher, dass frpt den ersten fetten auftrag erhalten wird, ähnlich wie es beim cougar und buffalo der fall war. und so macht dann auch der roxboro deal sinn.

ich schrieb auf IV vor einigen wochen, dass ich mit 12-14 mio shorten shares rechne und wurde von einigen deswegen belächelt. nun, es wurden 14 mio plus (so denke ich) um und bei 3-4mio naked geshortete aktien, die uns jetzt seit über 3 wochen auf der SHO liste halten. das ist eine gigantische zahl und wenn ich mir die insti zahlen anschaue, so kann es eigentlich nicht sein, dass wir im vergangenen monat mehr als 60mio shares tradeten, es sei denn, dass hedgies, MM und shorts in allians shares hin und her spulten, um die kurse zu drücken. a verkauft nach b in ständig sinkende bids, danach wird b zum verkäufer und a steht im sinkenden bid. was zunächst aussieht als würde es keinen sinn machen, macht dann sinn, wenn geshortet wird und gleichzeitig alle retails rausgeschüttelt werden, deren shares dann auf dem weg nach unten durch panikverkäufe und stop losses den instis in die hände fallen.

fakt ist: insti zahlen sind erneut nach oben gelaufen und es sieht für mich so aus, als wenn die PP leute NICHT den erforderlichen beitrag leisteten und mit deren 13mio shares ein covern ermöglichten. es könnte, ich betone KÖNNTE, sich ein short squeeze andeuten, nicht durch nervse instis, aber durch die retail shorts, die cramer und melissa folgten. denn die werden als erste covern und in panik. das könnte zu kursen führen, wo auch die professionellen beginnen zu covern. bis dahin sind aber noch rund 8 dollar luft und die müssen wir erst mal nach oben laufen, bevor die zweite stufe beginnt zu zünden.

was die SHO liste betrifft...ich stelle mich darauf ein, dass wir lange dort bleiben, denn es ist einfach nicht genug material an shares da, um zu covern. hört sich vielleicht etwas doof an bei den tagesumsätzen, aber ich bin mir sehr sehr sicher, dass im zuge des shortens die aktien im tagesverlauf diverse mal gedreht wurden, also 100k z.B. 3-4x hin und her gehandelt wurden. wenn das zwei, drei oder vier institute machen, haben wir das benötigte volumen, um einen sog zu schaffen, der uns nach unten laufen lässt.

der akzuelle short wurde meiner meinung nach durch die aufnahme in den russel index gezündet. die haben 13mio shares von den MM eingesammelt und das zu kursen,die deutlich unter dem lagen, was eigentlich marktpreis gewesen wäre. ihr erinnert euch an das blutbad. und diese shares mussten wieder besorgt werden und das geht eben wirtschaftlich sinnvoll nur, wenn der kahn unter wasser gedrückt wird. und das hat diese allianz auch sauber hinbekommen, wie man an den kursen sieht.

das chartbild ist kaputt, desaströs. und genau das war auch das ziel, um technische trader ebenfalls aus der aktie zu nehmen. hört sich vielleicht doof an aber ich sage hier: nicht der handel hat das chartbild konstruiert, sondern es wurde ein chartbild creiert mittels shortverkäufen, um die ziele zu erreichen. immer wenn wir an chartechnisch wichtige linien und bilder kamen, wurde massiv am kurs gearbeitet.

hätte ich das vorher gewusst, wären meine aktien ebenfalls in den markt gegangen. wenn ein güterzug auf dich zurollt, dann stellst du dich dem nicht entgegen. war also kurzfristig eine fehleinschätzung von mir und ich habe erneut gelernt.

auf der anderen seite halte ich echt viele shares und ich möchte nicht in der situation sein, in der sich andere mit vielen shares befinden. jetzt zu versuchen vielleicht 50,60 oder 70.000 shares zu kaufen, wird teuer und dauern. und mit einem average von deutlich unter 5 dollar war es ok zu halten, zumal ich so dem ziel näherkomme, auch für 2007 keine spekusteuern zu zahlen. sind ja auch rund 20%, die mit ins kalkül gezogen werden müssen.

ich habe mich gezwungen in richtung dezember zu schauen und das hat mir einen relativ ruhigen urlaub beschert, zumal die kids mit der mama in italien sind und ich so mal zeit für mich allein hatte.

die shorts werden kämpfen, das ist mal klar. und meinetwegen können sie das spiel weiter spielen, denn spätestens zum kommenden quartal wird die luft brennen. am ende entscheiden immer die zahlen, punkt und ende. und die sehen verdammt geil aus und das für mindestens die kommenden 3 jahre. bis dahin wird die company viel viel geld eingesammelt haben und ich rechne spätestens anfang 2008 mit einem forward split, was den shorts power nehmen wird. ich würde mir wünschen, dass wir minimum eine forward von 1 zu 2,5 machen, damit mehr liquidität an aktien da ist. das unterbindet short aktivitäten zwar nicht, beendet aber in der regel die extreme volatilität.

eigentlich wollte ich auch nur sagen, dass ich wieder fast voll investiert bin mit dem geld, dass ich vor einigen monaten vom tisch nahm (ich schrieb es euch). für heute habe ich noch kaufkraft für 11k bei aktuellen kurs und ich werde sicher heir und da noch ein wenig knabbern.

erwartet keine wunder heute (obwohl es sie geben kann), aber shorts sielen mit emotionen. und das tagesziel der shorts dürfte sein, uns die postiven emotionen zu rauben, indem sie den kurs auf biegen und brechen halten oder gar noch weiter drücken. ob das so kommen wird, kann ich nicht sagen aber es ist dasziel dieser arschgeigen. wem übel wurde oder wird: quarterly report lesen, das hilft.

alles gute für euch und mich,
brasi

[BR101]

scöner artiekl...auch shorts brauchen in der derzeitigen krise liquidität und müssen irgendwann covern.
sehr lesenswert!

http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=102340&pt…

[BR101]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.116.186 von BR101 am 10.08.07 16:06:25

sorry, meine tastatur...

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.116.217 von BR101 am 10.08.07 16:07:47

man bei dir hat sich aber auch gar nix geändert ....!

[pagitz01]

und warum fährst du bei mir vorbei?????

DAS IS NICHT OKAY
auf éin eís mit kids hätt ich dich schon eingeladen!!

[BR101]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.116.784 von pagitz01 am 10.08.07 16:34:50

pagitz,

ich: dänemark
kids: italien
ex frau: italien

aber ich komme noch, versprochen

[coolrunning]

Auffälliger geht´s nicht mehr....

100er-Blöcke im ask... massenweise....

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.117.109 von coolrunning am 10.08.07 16:49:50

Die Blöcke gehen aber weg wie warme Semeln

Uhrzeit Kurs letztes Volumen kumuliert
17:00:08 15,24 240 989.386
17:00:07 15,23 200 989.146
17:00:07 15,23 200 988.946
17:00:07 15,23 100 988.746
17:00:07 15,23 200 988.646
17:00:07 15,23 100 988.446
17:00:07 15,23 1.000 988.346
17:00:07 15,21 1.200 987.346
17:00:07 15,21 1.800 986.146
17:00:05 15,20 800 984.346
17:00:05 15,20 100 983.546
17:00:05 15,20 300 983.446
17:00:05 15,20 200 983.146
17:00:05 15,20 100 982.946
17:00:05 15,20 500 982.846
17:00:05 15,20 1.000 982.346
17:00:00 15,14 100 981.346
17:00:00 15,14 300 981.246
16:59:56 15,18 500 980.946
16:59:56 15,18 100 980.446
16:59:56 15,18 100 980.346
16:59:56 15,18 184 980.246
16:59:55 15,18 300 980.062
16:59:55 15,18 400 979.762
16:59:55 15,18 100 979.362
16:59:55 15,18 100 979.262
16:59:55 15,16 175


sampler

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.117.683 von sampler am 10.08.07 17:17:21

schade das der Aufstieg immer so mühsam ist,
runter gings in letzter Zeit wie von selbst, hat das was mit der schwerkraft zu tun?

[coolrunning]

Force Protection – 2007 Q2

As expected, Force Protection (NASDAQ: FRPT) reported yesterday (Aug. 9, 2007) a sharp increase in sales (140%) and net profit ($0.14 EPS) in its second quarter sales. The company's net sales reached US$134.7 million, compared to $56.1 million in Q2/06.

This surge reflects the growing demand for mine protected armored vehicles (MRAP) pioneered by Force Protection. In the first six months of 2007 the company sold about a quarter billion worth of armored vehicles ($234.9 million, 158% over the first half of 2006).

It also spent about $8 million on the development of its future lightweight vehicle, expected to enter production next year. With production rate growing, it seems that the entire year will be extra strong for Force Protection, according to Gordon McGilton, Chief Executive Officer of Force Protection, during the quarter the company was awarded contracts totaling $711 million to produce 1,455 MRAP vehicles. Despite the growing competition from Navistar's International and BAE Systems' Armor Holdings, the demand for MRAP is so high that the military is buying everything the industry will be able to produce In 2008.

To meet this demand Force Protection is planning to expand its product line beyond the current Buffalo and Cougar, adding the lighter Cheetah vehicle. Force protection expects its new facility will have a production capacity supporting approximately 2,000 Cheetahs in 2008.

Anticipating the growing demand for its products, Force Protection is well positioned to benefit from the expansion of production facilities made in the past months. McGilton indicated that his company "produced 229 vehicles in the second quarter compared to 285 vehicles in all of 2006." These volumes also contributed to higher profits, reflected by quarterly operating profit of $13.9 million for the 2nd quarter, compared to $1.8 million for the Q2/2006. Shareholders should be equally satisfied as net income for the six month period reached $12.1 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to net loss of $(989,267) or $(0.03) in the first half last year.

FY 2006: Force Protection Benefit from the Market Surge for Heavy Protected Armored vehicles

Benefiting from the rapid growth in the heavy armored vehicles market segment, Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT) reported its first profitable year experiencing dramatic growth.

Force protection reported March 16, 2007 that its net sales for 2006 totaled US$196 million, the company's net income from these operations amounted to $18.2 million, or $0.39 per diluted share. The fourth quarter represented about a third of the annual sales, ($62.9 million) and contributed to 93% of the annual net income. According to Gordon McGilton, Chief Executive Officer of Force Protection, 2006 has been a milestone year for the company. Following the completion of a $152.75 million equity offering and forging partnerships with industry leaders such as General Dynamics and Armor Holdings, the company positioned itself on course to tap the potential of surging demand for heavy armored vehicles for the US forces, as reflected by the MRAP and JLTV programs.

running

P.S.
Irgendwann lassen die shorties los....

[Gexe006]

Hallo Brasi, haste Dich gut erholt ?
Bei uns lagen die Nerven ein wenig blank

Force Protection Industries, Inc., Ladson, S.C., is being awarded $69,799,900 for delivery order #0005 under previously awarded firm-fixed-priced, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract (M67854-07-D-5031) to purchase 25 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I Cougar vehicles and 100 MRAP Category II Cougar vehicles. MRAP vehicles are armored vehicles with a blast resistant underbody designed to protect the crew from mine blasts, fragmentary and direct fire weapons. Work will be performed in Ladson, S.C; Anniston, Ala.; and Sealy, Texas, and work is expected to be completed December 2007. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procure. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.113.861 von BR101 am 10.08.07 13:55:33

naja die größte sorge ist eben dass frpt ausgespiel wurde vom bösen buben GD... sie haben die preise gedrückt und machen nun die dinger auf eigene faust... JV ade ?
dass die shorts das nutzen ist klar... dass frpt derzeit nicht überbewertet ist auch....
sowieso grad alles ein psychospielchen

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.111.072 von coolrunning am 10.08.07 10:55:59

Es werden weitere Aufträge kommen, denn FRPT liefert die besten Fahrzeuge, das ist unbestritten. Lieferprobleme dürfen nicht mehr vorkommen. Die Aufträge und Vergabe an Mitbewerber war auch ein deutliches Zeichen zu zwei Punkten:
1. Wir dulden keine Verzögerungen
2. Wer schnell liefern kann und die nötigen Produktions- und Lieferkapazitäten besitzt, wird bevorzugt, auch wenn die Fahrzeuge nur an Nummer zwei oder drei gesehen werden, denn das leben unserer Soldaten hat Priorität

Wenn das leben der Soldaten Priorität hat, dann wären die besten Fahrzeuge das einzige was zählt, oder will man wegen 1-2 Monate Wartezeit die Leute dann dafür Jahre in nicht so sichere Fahrzeugen setzen?
Oder sind die Frpt-Fahrzeuge doch nicht so viel sicherer, wenn überhaupt?

Bestellst du einen Ferrarie, und weil die Lieferung sich verzögert bestellst du ab und nimmst dafür einen BMW? Also ich würde warten.

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=102624&pt=…

Ich möchte hier Keinen hören der wieder jammert, wenn es etwas runter geht. Nehmt euch an Denen ein Beispiel, die etwas davon verstehen...

Gute Nacht
running

[coolrunning]

25 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I Cougar vehicles and 100 MRAP Category II Cougar vehicles.

Schön...

Immer rein damit, denn die Kapazitäten werden immer besser.

[wohinistmeinGeld]

nachbörslich ist reger Handel bis 16.25

[kyron7htx]

AP
Force Protection Gets $69.8M Navy Deal
Friday August 10, 5:49 pm ET
Force Protection Gets $69.8 Million Navy Deal for 125 Armored Vehicles


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Force Protection Industries Inc. on Friday won yet another armored protected vehicle contract from the Navy worth up to $69.8 million, the Pentagon said on Friday.
The latest contract could help boost the armored vehicle maker's sales for the upcoming quarter even higher. On Thursday, the Ladson, S.C.-based company reported net income for the second quarter soared to $9.6 million, or 14 cents per share, from $424,047, or a penny per share, in the prior-year period. Revenue more than doubled to $134.7 million, from $56.1 million, boosted by increased vehicle orders by the Pentagon.

ADVERTISEMENT





Analysts, on average, were expecting earnings of 13 cents per share on revenue of $145 million.

Force Protection will build and deliver 125 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected, or MRAP, vehicles. The company is expected to deliver these vehicles by December 2007.

The MRAPs are designed with a V-shaped hull to repel explosives and roadside bombs.

The company is teaming up with Falls Church, Va.-based General Dynamics Corp under a joint venture called "Force Dynamics" to increase production capacity.

To date, the Pentagon has ordered 6,415 MRAP vehicles for soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan-- just short of its current target of 7,774 vehicles.

Shares of Force Protection added 18 cents to $15.73 in after-hours trading, after shares rose $1.17, or 8.1 percent, to $15.55.

[mc-plop]

Sehr verdächtig...



Institutional Holdings increases again today!!!!!

Yesterday I reported an increase from 48.9% to 53.7%. Today the increase is from 53.7% to 59.2%. That is 10.3% this week!!!!!
STAY LONG STAY STRONG


FRPT
Force Protection, Inc. NASDAQ-CM
Institutional Holdings Description | Hide Summary


Company Details
Total Shares Out Standing (millions): 68
Market Capitalization ($ millions): $981
Institutional Ownership: 59.2%
Price (as of 8/9/2007) 14.38


Ownership Analysis # Of Holders Shares
Total Shares Held: 132 40,381,316
New Positions: 81 22,415,390
Increased Positions: 100 29,276,997
Decreased Positions: 26 4,375,667
Holders With Activity: 126 33,652,664

[Wolf_45_2002]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.122.629 von wohinistmeinGeld am 10.08.07 23:48:23

>>>Bestellst du einen Ferrarie, und weil die Lieferung sich verzögert bestellst du ab und nimmst dafür einen BMW? Also ich würde warten.<<<


oder einen Lamborghini nehmen

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.130.176 von Wolf_45_2002 am 12.08.07 15:32:46

das ist natürlich das Problem wenn nicht klar ist was denn nun das Beste ist.

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.123.903 von kyron7htx am 11.08.07 11:48:40

aha das hatte ich noch gar nicht gelesen !!!
ist ja immerhin gar keine so kleine summe

[Wolf_45_2002]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.133.047 von wohinistmeinGeld am 12.08.07 19:38:03

>>>das ist natürlich das Problem wenn nicht klar ist was denn nun das Beste ist. Zwinkern <<<<


Nix ....

isse Problem ob Du habe genug die Kohle um draufzulege für Lamborghini statt billiges Ferrari

[Wolf_45_2002]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.133.789 von Wolf_45_2002 am 12.08.07 21:38:48

oder Du nehme die amerikanisches Billigschüssel Viper und spare viel Geld gegenüber die schon billige Ferrari.

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.123.903 von kyron7htx am 11.08.07 11:48:40

Its super!

[xero1972]

FORCE PROTECTION INC (U-FRPT) - News Release
Force Protection Announces $69 Million Order for Additional MRAP Cougar Vehicles

2007-08-13 09:38 ET - News Release



Company Website: http://www.forceprotection.net
LADSON, S.C. -- (Business Wire)

Force Protection, Inc. (Nasdaq:FRPT) today announced a follow-on order by the U.S. Marine Corps for 125 additional Cougar Category I and II vehicles for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle program. The award totals $69,799,900 and will deliver 25 Category I plus 100 Category II MRAPs as urgently requested by the federal government by the end of 2007.

The U.S. Department of Defense has now awarded Force Protection five delivery orders under its December 2006 open contract worth over $1.0 billion. As previously reported, work will be conducted with its joint venture partner, General Dynamics Land Systems.

“The significance of this order lies in the fact that, with our partners, Force Protection has found yet another production technique to make these strategic assets faster and more efficiently,” said Force Protection Chief Operating Officer Raymond Pollard. “Remember, we are responding to the warfighter not only with this life-saving technology in a timely manner, but also with the resources necessary to maintain this growing fleet of uniquely protected vehicles at the highest levels of performance.”

Force Protection has placed more than 60 Field Service Representatives (FSRs) in the field to assist the armed forces in training and vehicle maintenance in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“We have a proven solution to counter IEDs in the Cougar MRAPs,” said Vice President for Program Management Damon Walsh. “It is being fielded in greater numbers every day, and with the support system created by the deployment of our FSRs, troops will continue to have the resources that ensure optimal use of these vehicles.”

Force Protection Category I and II Cougar vehicles under contract now total over 1,900 under the MRAP program.

About Force Protection

Force Protection manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles are protected against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection’s mine and ballistic protection technology is among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, go to www.forceprotection.net.

About General Dynamics

General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics (NYSE:GD), is headquartered in Falls Church, Va., employs approximately 82,900 people worldwide and anticipates 2007 revenues of approximately $27 billion. The company has leading market positions in mission critical information systems and technologies, land and amphibious combat systems, shipbuilding and marine systems, and business aviation. More information about the company is available on the Internet at www.generaldynamics.com.


Contacts:

Policy Impact Communications
Jeff Child, 202-737-5339

Source: Force Protection, Inc.

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.141.306 von xero1972 am 13.08.07 15:43:05

Dann kann es ja wieder Richtung 40$ gehen.

Its super!

[kyron7htx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.148.581 von DollarPenny am 14.08.07 08:24:17

Etwas optimistisch, aber warum nicht. Schaun mer mal.

[coolrunning]

Langsam setzt sich ein Mosaik immer mehr zusammen.

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=103289&pt=…

Ist nur meine Vermutung....

Daher bleibe ich long and strong

running

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.150.939 von coolrunning am 14.08.07 10:59:13

was für ein mosaik?

bis ende jahr steht das teil eh wieder >30$

[coolrunning]

Goldmann Sachs kauft 4 Mio shares FRPT.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&refer=con…

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/force-protection-attra…

running

[topas98]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.160.164 von coolrunning am 14.08.07 20:47:58

also wenn goldmann sachs hier investiert, wissen wohl alle was dies für die zukunft bedeutet. long and strong !

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.163.848 von topas98 am 15.08.07 08:51:29

also nochmal nachkaufen, denn billiger wirds nimmer.

[coolrunning]

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/cougar-armored-trucks-to…

running

[kyron7htx]

Gute Q-Zahlen. 2 Aufträge ein kleinerer u. ein größerer. Und was passssssssiert? Es geht runter

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.174.199 von kyron7htx am 15.08.07 19:50:38

Also wenn ich richtig sehe und meine Informationen stimmen, dann gibt es mehr Käufer als Verkäufer.
Aber die shorties spielen sich die Bälle zu....

Mal sehen wie lange....

Wer hier zur Zeit verkauft ist entweder dämlich oder short...
Wenn ich kann nehme ich immer mal ein paar....

Ich weiß ja, wo der Kurs längerfristig stehen wird

Ach ja... und die Instis sind wohl auch blöd, was...

Also: Locker bleiben und durch die Hose atmen...

Schönen Abend noch

running

P.S. Wartet mal wenn der Cheetah kommt

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.174.963 von coolrunning am 15.08.07 20:46:52

wenn er denn kommt!!!!

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.174.990 von pagitz01 am 15.08.07 20:48:22

@pagitz

Wollen wir wetten (du wettest doch immer so gerne)

Spaß beiseite....

Das Papier kostet zur Zeit einige Nerven, aber wir sehen bald wieder andere Kurse...

Männer, die viele Schwestern haben sind pessimistisch, habe ich mal gelesen: Wieviel hast Du ?

Ich habe drei !

Ich wurde erst wieder optimistisch, als Sie im Wald an einen Baum gebunden habe ( mit einem Verkaufsschild an der Stirn)

Als ich nach drei Tagen wieder in den Wald ging, waren sie weg...

... und mit Ihnen mein Pessimismus

Bis die Tage...

running

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.175.345 von coolrunning am 15.08.07 21:14:07

auch3

eine davon treibt hier ihr unwessen naschu!!!

[Highnoon120]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.175.345 von coolrunning am 15.08.07 21:14:07

[Gexe006]

Wird msl wieder Zeit für ein Update von cnbc.com

Stand 12.07.07
Large Block Owners 339
Total Number of Shares
Held 87.2M
Buyers 7/13/07 29,307,201 $522.06 54.9%
Sellers 7/13/07 13,467,033 $133.87 25.6%
Institutions 118 Holders
Mutual Funds 103 Holders
Other Major Holders 118 Holders
Concentration of Current % Held

Top 10 Institutions
Midsummer ... 3.8M $77,984,112 +8% 5.6% Moderate
Wellington ... 3.2M $59,696,196 +7% 4.7% Low
Gruber & McBaine ... 2.4M $44,598,148 +5% 3.5% Moderate
Oppenheimer ... 2.1M $39,103,344 +5% 3.1% Moderate
PEF Advisors, L.L.C. 2.0M $1,843,227 +5% 3.0% Low
MFC Global ... 2.0M $37,063,194 +4% 2.9% Low
Veredus Asset ... 1.9M $35,421,225 +4% 2.8% High
Friess ... 1.6M $29,121,148 +3% 2.3% High
Arbor Capital ... 1.5M $28,138,124 +3% 2.2% Moderate
Ashford Capital, ... 1.4M $30,338,054 +3% 2.1% High

Top Mutual Fund Holders
John Hancock ... 1.6M $33,719,630 +3% 2.3% Deep Value
Managers Special ... 608.9K $11,423,433 +1% 0.9% Growth
Franklin Small ... 601.0K $11,274,760 +1% 0.9% Growth
American Century ... 542.0K $11,761,400 +1% 0.8% Aggres. Gr.
Allianz OCC ... 524.6K $11,383,473 +1% 0.8% Momentum
Fidelity Small ... 495.0K $10,741,500 +1% 0.7% Core Value
Fidelity Select ... 472.8K $7,706,640 +1% 0.7% Sector
Specific
Fidelity Capital ... 453.8K $9,847,243 +1% 0.7% Core Growth
Allianz OCC ... 350.7K $7,611,123 +1% 0.5% Momentum
Perritt Micro ... 307.5K $5,769,019 +1% 0.5% Deep Value

Heute

Shareholders
Top Shareholders
Large Block Owners 393
Total Number of Shares Held 91.4M
% Change in Ownership -10%
% Shares Owned 98%

Monthly Rotation Number
of Shares Value of
Change (MM) % of Shrs.
Outstanding
Buyers 8/15/07 32,927,156 $606.34 63.5%
Sellers 8/15/07 15,117,767 $129.63 18.6%

Institutions:
139 Holders
$842,290,679 Value
67.0% Owned of O/S
Mutual Funds:
115 Holders
$236,092,945 Value
16.9% Owned of O/S Other
Major Holders:
139 Holders
$842,290,683 Value
67.0% Owned of O/S Institutions 139 Holders
Mutual Funds 115 Holders
Other Major Holders 139 Holders


Top 10 Institutions:Outstanding Turnover
Rating
Goldman Sachs ... 3.5M $72,131,599 +7% 5.1% Moderate
Wellington ... 3.2M $59,696,196 +7% 4.7% Low
Midsummer ... 2.4M $37,883,613 +5% 3.5% Moderate
Oppenheimer ... 2.1M $39,103,344 +4% 3.1% Moderate
PEF Advisors, L.L.C. 2.0M $1,843,227 +4% 3.0% Low
MFC Global ... 2.0M $37,063,194 +4% 2.9% Low
Veredus Asset ... 1.9M $39,435,816 +4% 2.8% High
American Century ... 1.9M $39,077,526 +4% 2.8% Moderate
Friess ... 1.6M $29,121,148 +3% 2.3% High
Arbor Capital ... 1.5M $28,138,124 +3% 2.2% Moderate

Top Mutual Fund
John Hancock ... 1.6M $33,719,630 +3% 2.3% Deep Value
Brandywine Fund, ... 624.2K $12,883,488 +1% 0.9% Momentum
Managers Special ... 608.7K $12,564,084 +1% 0.9% Growth
American Century ... 542.0K $11,761,400 +1% 0.8% Aggres. Gr.
Fidelity Small ... 495.0K $10,741,500 +1% 0.7% Core Value
Fidelity Select ... 472.8K $9,758,592 +1% 0.7% Sector Specific
Fidelity Capital ... 453.8K $9,847,243 +1% 0.7% Core Growth
American Century ... 350.6K $7,608,020 +1% 0.5% Growth
Allianz OCC ... 350.0K $7,224,000 +1% 0.5% Momentum
Perritt Micro ... 307.5K $6,673,119 +1% 0.5% Deep Value

Macht Euch selbst ein Bild !!!
Long and

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.177.108 von Gexe006 am 15.08.07 23:23:53

Scheint alles in festen Händen zu sein. Its super!

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=103860&pt=…

running

[coolrunning]

Short interest date Short interest ratio Short interest shares
Jul 10 2007 5.6 14,881,117
Jun 12 2007 3.8 8,994,004
May 10 2007 5.6 8,695,554
Apr 10 2007 9.1 9,055,524
Mar 12 2007 5.6 9,378,900
Feb 12 2007 4.3 7,506,973
Jan 09 2007 0 0
Dec 12 2006 0 0
Nov 10 2006 0 0
Oct 10 2006 0 0
Sep 12 2006 0 0
Aug 10 2006 0 0

running

[coolrunning]

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=FRPT

running

[DollarPenny]

Wahnsinns Umsätze gestern in USA. Das ding fliegt wieder Richtung 20$ heute.

Its super!

[DollarPenny]

pari 11,63€

[DollarPenny]

Kaufkurse!
Bis 15:30 stehen wir bei 11,7€ und dann geht es weiter nach oben. Also Nachladen.

[DollarPenny]

komm noch 20centdann haben wir 11,7€

[sampler]

Das sollte für zusätzlichen Schwung sorgen:

Eilmeldung
Fed senkt Diskont-Zinsen

Die US-Notenbank Fed hat die Zinsen gesenkt, zu denen sich Banken bei ihr Geld leihen können. Das teilte die Notenbank mit.


Quelle: www.ftd.de

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.204.823 von sampler am 17.08.07 15:07:28

Die Nachricht kommt ja zum Richtigen Zeitpunkt. Dann wird es gleich in den USA losgehen.

>20$

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.204.823 von sampler am 17.08.07 15:07:28

ach ja,

undzwar um 0.5 %

sampler

[coolrunning]

http://www.abcnews4.com/news/stories/0807/448185.html

running

[bregenzer]

http://dodvclips.mil/?&fr_story=171178a13d89ed1a0e81aba53845…

[DollarPenny]

Am Freitag sind in USA wieder 8.000.000 gekauft worden. Das brummt ganz schön!

Its super!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.224.296 von DollarPenny am 20.08.07 09:05:59

also 1. mal, wo sollen die 8 Mio verkauft worden sein, ich sehe gerade mal knapp über 1 Mio, und
2., selbst wenn, dann sind 8 Mio verkauft worden, it´s shit.

Ich glaube eher, du kannst Stückzahlen und $ nicht unterscheiden

[Highnoon120]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.224.729 von wohinistmeinGeld am 20.08.07 09:45:21

jaja, immer diese Amatuere

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.224.729 von wohinistmeinGeld am 20.08.07 09:45:21

gekauft und verkauft is auch one unterschied.
Suc..

[coolrunning]

http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/aug/21/protected_vehicle…

running

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.238.445 von coolrunning am 21.08.07 12:29:17

naja is ja nicht unbedingt gut diese nachricht!!!!


so schönen tag noch meiner kann nicht mehr so schön werden habe heute meine jugend verloren!!!

bin jetzt auch 30!!

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.239.807 von pagitz01 am 21.08.07 14:15:06

Na denn HERZLICHEN GLÜCKWUNSCH

oder mein Beileid

Ganz wie es Dir beliebt

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.239.807 von pagitz01 am 21.08.07 14:15:06

also wenn ich das mit meinem bescheidenen englisch richtig verstehe ist es doch eher gut für Frpt wenn es bei der Konkurenz schlecht läuft.

[hajowe]

Quantum Awarded Contract by Force Protection for Engineering and Initial Production of Armored Military Vehicles
Wednesday August 22, 6:00 am ET


IRVINE, Calif., Aug. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (Nasdaq: QTWW - News) today announced that its Tecstar Automotive Group was awarded a major contract by Force Protection, Inc. (Nasdaq: FRPT - News) of Ladson, South Carolina to provide engineering design and production support for its Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Cheetah vehicle series. Force Protection recently announced the purchase of a new 430,000 square foot facility in Roxboro, North Carolina to expand its production capacity for current and future products, including the Cheetah vehicle line.





The initial efforts under this production implementation contract included prototype vehicle builds, manufacturing process development, and pre-production vehicles. Under this follow-on contract, Quantum's Tecstar Automotive Group will be providing manufacturing engineering support to develop the plant layout, specifying and procuring required equipment and tooling, set up of the assembly line, hiring and training the workforce, and managing the production line for Force Protection's Cheetah vehicle program. The contract includes the production of the Cheetah vehicles by Tecstar.

"We are pleased to continue supporting Force Protection, Inc. in producing its advanced ballistic- and blast-protected vehicles, which have protected and saved the lives of our armed forces and security personnel overseas," said Alan Niedzwiecki, President and CEO of Quantum. "We look forward to applying our fast-to-market, limited volume production expertise to assist in ramping up the production and deployment of these critically-needed vehicles."

About Quantum:

Quantum, a fully integrated alternative energy company, is a leader in powertrain engineering, system integration and manufacturing of packaged fuel systems and accessories for specialty vehicles and applications including fuel cells, hybrids, alternative fuels, hydrogen refueling, new body styles, mid-cycle vehicle product enhancements and high performance engines and drive trains for OEMs and consumers of aftermarket parts and accessories. Quantum also designs and manufactures hybrid and fuel cell vehicles. Quantum also develops and manufacturers advanced lithium-ion batteries through its partner, Advanced Lithium Power.

Quantum has product commercialization alliances with General Motors, AM General and Sumitomo. Quantum's customer base includes General Motors, Toyota, Opel, Hyundai, Suzuki, Ford, DaimlerChrysler, SunLine, Yamaha, AeroVironment, and the U.S. Army.

More information can be found about Quantum's products and services at http://www.qtww.com .

About Force Protection Inc.:

Force Protection, Inc. manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic

protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C.

More information on Force Protection and its vehicles can be found at http://www.forceprotection.net .

Forward Looking Statements

Except for historical information, the statements, expectations, and assumptions contained in the foregoing press release are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Company's expectations regarding expected future revenues and operating results; future opportunities for Quantum; the Company's ability to fulfill orders in the future; and other statements about the future expectations, beliefs, goals, plans, or prospects expressed by management. Such statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include, among other factors, prevailing market conditions; the Company's ability to design and market automotive products; the Company's ability to meet customer specifications and qualification requirements; availability of component parts and raw materials that meet the Company's requirements; and the Company's ability to source alternative materials and suppliers. Reference should also be made to the risk factors set forth from time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including but not limited to those contained in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007. The Company does not undertake to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that the indicated results or events will not be realized.


For more information regarding Quantum, please contact:

Dale Rasmussen
Investor Relations
Email: [e-mail]
[phone]

©2007 Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc.
Advanced Technology Center
17872 Cartwright Road, Irvine, CA 92614
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc

[hajowe]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.254.072 von hajowe am 22.08.07 13:40:58

Der Cheetah soll also von Tecstar/Quantum produziert werden? Hab ich das richtig verstanden?

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.254.142 von hajowe am 22.08.07 13:44:36

This is an exciting development for Force Protection,” said COO Raymond Pollard. "This will be a strategically important facility for the company, as it will enable us to continue to ramp up MRAP vehicle deliveries on the Cougar and Buffalo lines while simultaneously producing the next generation Cheetah vehicle series. At this new facility, we will initially have the capacity to produce approximately 2,000 vehicles in 2008."


Force wird den Cheetah auch selbst produzieren in Roxboro.

Quantum/Tecstar wird zusätzlich produzieren, unterstützen, ausbilden etc.

Da erhofft man sich wohl dicke Aufträge

running

[coolrunning]

Es hat aber auch den Anschein, als wenn FRPT Quantum/Tecstar nach Roxboro holen will, aber das kann ich kaum glauben... mmmhhhh

running

[coolrunning]

News for 'FRPT' - (Force Protection's Anti-Mine Vehicle Designed in SolidWorks 'Stars' in 'Transformers' Movie SolidWorks 3D CAD software ensures 23-ton vehicle used to maintain troop and civilian safety around the world is 'more than meets the eye')
News for 'FRPT' - (Force Protection's Anti-Mine Vehicle Designed in SolidWorks 'Stars' in 'Transformers' Movie SolidWorks 3D CAD software ensures 23-ton vehicle used to maintain troop and civilian safety around the world is 'more than meets the eye')


CONCORD, Mass., Aug 22, 2007 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- A mons! trous vehicle developed
in SolidWorks(R) 3D CAD and COSMOSWorks(R) design analysis software and used to
detect and remove mines in troubled areas around the world is an "actor" in the
recently released "Transformers" movie. Force Protection, Inc. designed its
Buffalo Mine Protected Clearance Vehicle (MPCV) to be a lifesaver, but the
vehicle's resume now boasts a Hollywood part as the evil Decepticon Bonecrusher.

Already deployed globally and in use since 2003, the Buffalo MPCV several months
ago made a trip to the DreamWorks movie studio where engineers and creative
artists inspected the vehicle, which is 27 feet long, 10 feet wide, and 13 feet
tall. It has a long hydraulic arm with a rake attachment that can scoop up
roadside explosives. The studio's creative designers constructed a digital model
of the vehicle used to put the Bonecrusher in motion.

"It's pretty cool to have a character in a movie based upon one of our company's
des! igns," said Derek Parker, engineering section manager of t he Capsule Group at
Force Protection. "But as menacing as the transformer looks on film, the
Buffalo's real-life mission means that it must be even more rugged than what is
portrayed in the film. SolidWorks and COSMOSWorks allowed us to explore myriad
design options to make sure it is tough enough to withstand the extreme
conditions that it operates in."

Based outside of Charleston, S.C., Force Protection has standardized on 94
licenses of SolidWorks software to better design a broad range of vehicles used
in military applications. The company dramatically reduces development time and
production costs using SolidWorks and COSMOSWorks by conducting much of its
vehicle prototyping on computers. "We're now able to see if components such as
engine mounts or the drive train will line up within required tolerances to
ensure a safe and reliable vehicle. The software allows us to save time so we
can focus on evaluating the best design approach an! d constantly improve our
designs while reducing the number of prototypes we build. Ultimately, we begin
final production sooner, and minimize otherwise huge expenses," said Parker.

Parker cited other SolidWorks benefits, including the intuitive user interface,
associativity to automate changes throughout the design, and easily
understandable 3D models that politicians, military commanders, and
non-engineers can interpret.

"Whether in the military, or Hollywood, Force Protection's customers have very
high expectations for its vehicles," said Rainer Gawlick, SolidWorks vice
president of worldwide marketing. "Having the right 3D CAD and design analysis
software helps the company continue designing better products to meet those
expectations."

Force Protection, Inc. works with authorized SolidWorks' reseller ModernTech
Mechanical for ongoing software training, implementation, and support.

About Force Protection

Force Pro! tection is a leading blast and ballistics research and man ufacturing
enterprise, specializing in the development and production of vehicles that are
designed to save the lives of troops around the world by shielding them from the
deadly effects of roadside bombs, or IEDs. The company's vehicles have become
the gold standard and the in-field performance of its Cougar and Buffalo
vehicles is unmatched in the industry, standing as evidence that not all v-
shaped hulls are created equally. Force Protection's mine and ballistic
protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles
are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information, visit the
company's Web site at www.forceprotection.net.

About ModernTech Mechanical

Representing SolidWorks since 1996, ModernTech Mechanical is a value added
reseller representing leading design technology providers such as SolidWorks, Z
Corporation, CADpo, and others. ModernTech Mechanical is focused on the needs of
companies ! in the mechanical and manufacturing marketplace and is one of the
largest SolidWorks resellers in the Southeast. For more information, visit the
Web site at www.moderntechmech.com.

About SolidWorks Corporation

SolidWorks Corporation, a Dassault Systemes S.A. (Nasdaq: DASTY, Euronext Paris:
#13065, DSY.PA) company, develops and markets software for design, analysis, and
product data management. It is the leading supplier of 3D CAD technology, giving
teams intuitive, high-performing software that helps them design better
products. For the latest news, information, or an online demonstration, visit
the company's Web site (www.solidworks.com) or call 1-800-693-9000 (outside of
North America, call [phone]).

SolidWorks is a registered trademark of SolidWorks Corporation. COSMOSWorks is a
registered trademark of Structural Research & Analysis Corporation. Other brand
and product names are trademarks of their respective owners. C! opyright (c) 2007
SolidWorks Corporation.


running

[coolrunning]

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=4824…

running

[sauerback]

UPDATE 1-Pentagon cuts armored vehicles due in Iraq in 2007
Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:21PM EDT

By Kristin Roberts

WASHINGTON, Aug 22 (Reuters) - U.S. troops in Iraq will receive at least 1,000 fewer special armored vehicles than expected this year due to the amount of time needed for shipment, the Pentagon said on Wednesday.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said the Defense Department expected defense contractors to produce 3,900 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles this year. But only 1,500 would make it to the war zone -- down from the Pentagon's previous shipment target of 2,500 to 3,000.

"If we could get 1,500 to theater by the end of this year, that would be a positive development," Morrell said.

The new goal of 1,500 was first reported by Stars & Stripes, the newspaper for troops overseas that is partially funded by the Defense Department.

The MRAP vehicle is one of the Pentagon's top acquisition priorities and the Defense Department's aim has been to buy as many as can be produced. It follows years of criticism directed at the Pentagon for not providing adequate armor to troops.

The MRAPs' V-shaped hull is designed to protect occupants from roadside bombs, which have killed many U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Morrell said it takes about 50 days to equip and ship a finished MRAP into the war zone. That includes 15 days for equipping and 35 for transport by ship.

The Pentagon was already flying some MRAPs to the war zone, Morrell said.

But given the numbers to be produced, it will quickly become more cost effective to send them by ship, he said, noting November and December would be the highest production months to date.

Morrell said he did not know which units in Iraq would be affected by the production shortfall this year.

MRAP contractors include:

-- Navistar International Corp.'s (NAVZ.PK: Quote, Profile, Research) International Military and Government LLC;

-- Force Protection Inc. (FRPT.O: Quote, Profile, Research), which is partnered with General Dynamics Corp.'s (GD.N: Quote, Profile, Research) Land Systems business arm;

-- a General Dynamics Canadian unit;

-- BAE Systems Plc (BA.L: Quote, Profile, Research);

-- Oshkosh Truck Corp. (OSK.N: Quote, Profile, Research);

-- closely held Protected Vehicles Inc. of North Charleston, South Carolina;

[DollarPenny]

pari 12,46€

[coolrunning]

Als, wenn FRPT nicht schon geug um die Ohren hätte...

Jetzt muss man sich auch noch mit Nachahmer und Kopierer rumschlagen....

Force Protection Inc. sues local rival Protected Vehicles Inc.
A Ladson company that makes armored trucks for the military has declared war on a local rival over trade secrets used in building the blast-resistant combat vehicles.

Force Protection Inc. this week sued Protected Vehicles Inc. and its founder, Garth Barrett, a former top Force Protection executive who resigned two years ago today and within months started a competing business.

The lawsuit alleges that Barrett and other former Force Protection officials made off with confidential information about Force Protection's vehicle design and suppliers and has used it to help build their new company.

As a result, North Charleston-based Protected Vehicles is competing unfairly with Force Protection "by avoiding substantial expense and time required to develop, build, and test their own armored vehicles," Force Protection said in documents filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston.

Barrett did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday, and his company has not yet filed a response to the allegations. A Force Protection spokesman declined to discuss the lawsuit.

Both manufacturers are among a growing number around the country that are vying heavily for orders from the Pentagon, which has earmarked $1.1 billion this year to buy mine-resistant armored vehicles in an effort to reduce the number of casualties from roadside explosive devices.

The military uses the vehicles in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Barrett started Force Protection as Technical Solutions Group Inc. a decade ago. Over the years, the company "developed numerous commercially valuable trade secrets and a considerable amount of valuable confidential, technical and business information concerning the design, production, marketing, and sale of armored vehicles," according to the complaint.

At Force Protection, Barrett held several high-level positions, including president and chief technology officer. He became "intimately familiar" with the design of the vehicles, and he began copying records for his own personal use, the lawsuit alleges.

When Barrett resigned on Aug. 23, 2005, he told co-workers that he didn't plan to start a competing company and declined an offer to cut back gradually on his responsibilities, Force Protection said. Three weeks later, Barrett reserved the name Protected Vehicles Inc., and by Oct. 24 of that year he incorporated the company, according to the court filing.

Around the same time, Thomas Thebes left as Force Protection's vice president of finance and chief financial officer to join Barrett in his new venture, taking with him a computer hard drive, according to the lawsuit. Thebes didn't respond to messages left at his Raleigh home.

The court filing claims that through their lawyers, Thebes and Barrett admitted to taking hard drives containing "trade secrets and confidential information regarding the design, development, testing, construction and operation of Force Protection's armored vehicles."

They also admitted to taking photographs of vehicles, as well as information about customers, vendors, pricing and employees, the complaint added.

Their actions violate confidentiality agreements that both former executives signed, the lawsuit alleges.

The suit also names another former Force Protection executive, Paul Palmer, who, like Thebes, left to join Protected Vehicles. While at Force Protection, Palmer worked as production planner and was knowledgeable about the company's manufacturing processes and other trade secrets, the lawsuit said. Palmer did not return phone calls.

Force Protection alleges that Barrett improperly encouraged other employees who were familiar with sensitive inside information to join Protected Vehicles.

To date, Protected Vehicles has made few inroads on Force Protection's turf.

Force Protection has landed numerous government contracts in recent years and has formed a joint venture with defense giant General Dynamics to help it meet demand. The company's 1,000 employees currently are assembling 22 of its Cougar vehicles for the government as part of a $5.3 million contract, said spokesman Tommy Pruitt.

Securing orders has been more difficult for Barrett and his upstart company. Earlier this week, Protected Vehicles announced the firing of 230 workers after the company said it was unable to obtain enough work.
http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/aug/23/armored_warfare13…

running

[coolrunning]

CHARLESTON, S.C.(AP)--Force Protection Inc. (FRPT), which makes mine-resistant vehicles for the military, has filed a lawsuit claiming a nearby competitor stole trade secrets.


The lawsuit filed Tuesday names Protected Vehicles Inc. and its founder, Garth Barrett, a former Force Protection president who resigned two years ago and started the new business about 10 miles away.

The suit, which also names two other Protected Vehicles executives, claims while at Force Protection, Barrett made a copy of his computer hard drive " containing trade secrets and confidential information belonging to Force Protection."

Barrett didn't immediately return a telephone message Thursday from The Associated Press.

The 29-page federal lawsuit claims computer fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair trade practices and breach of contract.

Protected Vehicles competed unfairly "by avoiding substantial expense and time required to develop, build, and test their own armored vehicles," according to the lawsuit.

The suit seeks unspecified damages and asks the court to require Protected Vehicles to return the information that Force Protection claims was taken.

The companies are among several around the county building mine-resistant vehicles for the Pentagon, which plans to spend $1.1 billion on them this year.

Force Protection now employs 1,000 workers.

Protected Vehicles announced this week that it was laying off 230 workers, or about half its work force, because it had not been able to win an adequate number of government contracts.

running

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.275.689 von coolrunning am 23.08.07 23:11:13

na gut dann machen wir halt durch ein paar klagen etwas kohle!!!

[coolrunning]

aus IV

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=105746&pt=…

running

[Guerilla Investor]

Kein auch nur noch andeutungsweise vernünftiger Umsatz in Germany ... hier ist der Bart schon mal ab ...

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.285.037 von Guerilla Investor am 24.08.07 18:44:56

wenn intressiert germany junge°!!!!!

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.285.284 von pagitz01 am 24.08.07 19:07:21

Mich ... ich wohne hier ...

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.286.419 von Guerilla Investor am 24.08.07 20:55:56

Ich würd mal gern die Speisekarte lesen...............






Pitza Kappritschosa???????????...............


Nicht schlagen-----sollte nur ein Geck sein.

[Gexe006]

Military Struggles to Meet MRAP Demand
Friday August 24, 5:23 pm ET
By Donna Borak, AP Business Writer
Outfitting Souped-Up Armored Vehicles Is Slowing the Pace of Delivery to Iraq, Elsewhere


ABERDEEN, Md. -- The U.S. military is scrambling to outfit thousands of mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles with radios and other equipment, delaying shipment to soldiers for protection from roadside bombs.
ADVERTISEMENT


The Marine Corps commander in charge of MRAP delivery said Friday that five armored vehicle-makers are delivering hundreds of MRAPs to a military facility in South Carolina, which is struggling to keep pace with putting all the necessary equipment on the volume of vehicles needed overseas.

"Different things happen in the continuum and there are certainly going to be time lags associated," said Gen. Brig. Michael at a demo day for the media to test-drive three MRAP models at Aberdeen Proving Ground, a military test site.

The MRAPs look and feel like Humvees on steroids, with tires as big as those used on trucks in demolition derbies.

Contractors and the government are feeling the strain of the Pentagon's rush on MRAPs, which are built with a V-shaped hull to repel improvised explosive devices commonly used by enemy insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. Brogan said the South Carolina facility is expanding capacity to keep up with vendor deliveries.

The delays are "the result of a hurried process that was not well- defined," Michael Aldrich, a vice president for Force Protection, an MRAP manufacturer, said in a telephone interview.

Earlier this week, the Pentagon said it would fall short of its goal of delivering 3,500 vehicles by year-end. To date, roughly 400 MRAPs have been delivered to Iraq and another 1,100 will arrive there by year-end, the military now says.

Aldrich added that the military's MRAP problem won't "end with late deliveries. It's going to be exacerbated by a replacement-parts nightmare trying to sustain these multiple vehicles ... and it's going to be prohibitively expensive to keep doing that."

The Pentagon has ordered more than 6,415 MRAPs and plans to award a second round of contracts later this year.

Even as the military puts in more rush orders for MRAPs, shipping them to Iraq and elsewhere by military transport is proving more expensive than expected.

Brogan said Friday that the Pentagon is looking at commercial aircraft or ships as the volume of MRAP delivery increases.

"We are geared up at least in the near term for every single vehicle that we produce to be flown into theater," said Brogan. He declined to specify where in Iraq the MRAPs are being delivered.

Ladson, S.C.-based Force Protection Industries Inc. and Fairfax, Va.-based General Dynamics Corp. have received contracts worth over $1 billion to build more than 1,900 vehicles by February 2008.

Aldrich said Force Protection is not experiencing production delays and expects to stay on schedule the rest of the year.

Other contractors, including Armor Holding Inc. -- acquired in July by U.S. subsidiary of British defense conglomerate BAE Systems PLC -- and Navistar International Corp.'s, subsidiary International Military and Government LLC, have each won several contracts to build more MRAPs.

At the end of July, the Pentagon opened a second competition to attract other companies to help build MRAPs because of high demand.

Wall Street expects at least 14 other companies to submit test vehicles by mid-September, including AM General Corp., the maker of armored Humvees, Oshkosh Truck Corp., Lockheed Martin Corp., Ceradyne Inc., L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. and Textron Inc., and two international companies, including Regis Trading International of South Africa and Krauss-Maffei Wegmann of Germany. Contractors will be selected in early December.

However, Aldrich says additional vendors slow the process even further as they face the challenge of building an MRAP for the first time.

[coolrunning]

After Hours Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours Share Volume
19:40 $ 17.26 300
19:39 $ 17.26 200
18:26 $ 17.28 350
17:16 $ 17.39 200
17:16 $ 17.39 100
16:11 $ 17.1344 400
16:11 $ 17.28 100
16:11 $ 17.28 100
16:11 $ 17.28 100
16:11 $ 17.28 100
16:11 $ 17.28 100
16:10 $ 17.28 500
16:08 $ 17.30 93,540
16:08 $ 17.28 460
16:01 $ 17.30 100
16:00 $ 17.30

Wieder mal ein Block in feste Hände


So wie ich es im vorangegangen Text lese, sollen neue bzw. zusätzliche Lieferanten beauftragt werden, damit die Fahrzeuge schneller für die Soldaten bereit stehen. Das wäre natürlich schlecht für FRPT.
Hier geht es also im Moment nicht um Qualität, sondern Quantität und schnellstmögliche Lieferfähigkeit.

Will sich jemand mit mir zusammen tun und gepanzerte Fahrzeuge bauen, wenn ja doch bald jede Klitsche genommen wird, die liefern kann ?

Wie ist eure Meinung dazu ?

running

[bregenzer]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.289.531 von coolrunning am 25.08.07 09:38:29

Ich.
Ich habe einen Werkzeugkasten und eine Lötlampe

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.289.531 von coolrunning am 25.08.07 09:38:29

es würde wohl wenig Sinn machen wenn man möglichst schnell für die Mannschaften sichere Fahrzeuge will und dann aus Zeitgründen unsicher nimmt, dann könnte man auch die bisher unsicheren behalten.
Wer sagt denn, daß die Qualität der Konkurenten nicht gleich ist?

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.289.531 von coolrunning am 25.08.07 09:38:29

Ich bin gern bereit und stehe für eine Konzeptberatung zur Verfügung ...

Was die da bauen, kann man mit wenig Aufwand besser machen und zur Not auf sogar schon vorhandenes zurückgreifen, um mordsmäßig mit den Preisen arbeiten zu können ...

Ich hab mir die Vehikel mal ein wenig genauer angesehen, mit jeder albernen RPG9, welche nun mal seit 30 Jahren zur Grundausrüstung eines jeglichen sich für seriös geltend wirkenden Freischärlers gehört, macht man diesen klobigen Ungetümen den sicheren Garaus ...

[bregenzer]

ARMY TO BUY ADDITIONAL MRAP VEHICLES FOR COMMANDERS IN IRAQ

_______________________________________________
Date: August 27, 2007

As Pentagon leaders finalize the number of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles they will order for deployed U.S. forces, Army commanders in Iraq are requesting more than a dozen additional vehicles.

On Aug. 17, the Army published a notice announcing plans to purchase a batch of blast-proof trucks for bomb disposal teams, a move that would push the total number of MRAP vehicles ordered by the Defense Department beyond the near-term acquisition objective of 6,415 vehicles frequently cited by Pentagon leaders.
Army spokesman Lt. Col. William Wiggins told Inside the Army in an Aug. 22 e-mail that the order is part of the service’s standing need for 2,500 vehicles and “is not a new request outside of the MRAP program.”

Still, the order marks a departure from recent Pentagon procurement efforts under which the Marine Corps has acted as the executive agent and program manager for MRAP orders. However, for at least three years, the Army has independently purchased hundreds of MRAP-like trucks for units in Iraq to perform route clearance and escort missions.

The Army is preparing a solicitation, to be released early next month, for 18 new vehicles, Capt. Micah O’Neal, a contracting officer in Baghdad, told ITA in an Aug. 22 phone interview. The vehicle total includes six teams of three vehicles, one four-seat version and two 10-seat versions, he said.

“It’s a relatively small order,” O’Neal told ITA.

An award announced earlier this month -- for 125 additional MRAP vehicles to the Ladson, SC-based Force Protection Industries -- was expected to be the last in fiscal year 2007. That order, which closely followed a 600-vehicle award to General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada, brought the total number of blast-proof trucks ordered since November to 6,415.

The White House has requested $5.8 billion as a down payment toward as many as 8,000 more MRAP vehicles in FY-08.

The new solicitation calls specifically for Cougar Explosive Ordnance Disposal vehicles. However, whether the vehicles purchased will be Cougars, produced by Force Protection, or will simply be Cougar-like in their specifications, remains unclear.

If we were to go Cougar specifically as using that name, which was how it was kind of solicited . . . then Force Protection would be the one to get the sole-source contract because they already have the contract,” O’Neal explained. “But if we go and try to obtain an MRAP-type vehicle that is similar to the Cougar, then that will be a full and open competition.”

Michael Aldrich, Force Protection’s vice president for marketing and government relations, said his company is prepared to respond to the solicitation whether it is sole-source or competitively bid.

“We would just restart the line” if a sole-source contract were awarded, he told ITA in an Aug. 22 interview. “If it is fully competed, we will compete for it.”

However, if it is competitively bid, then his company has “politely requested” that the Cougar name, a registered trademark of Force Protection, not be used, he said.

“We are trying to reestablish the fact actually that Cougar is a brand name that belongs to Force Protection Industries, and all MRAP vehicles are not created equally,” he said.

O’Neal said the request for proposals will include the detailed specifications and will be published around Sept. 1.

However, it “might be pushed back a couple days,” he added. -- Marjorie Censer

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.295.604 von bregenzer am 26.08.07 09:28:54

SUPER!$$$$$$$$

[bregenzer]

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlog/articles/20070827.asp…

[Mr.Perfect]

Hallo Jungs,...

Chart sieht ja nun wieder viel besser aus und mit dem heutigen Tag sollte der Abwärtstrend durchbrochen sein.
Kann mir nun gut vorstellen dass frpt wieder in alte höhen weiter läuft.
was meint ihr dazu?
chartbild sieht fast identisch aus wie februar und märz diesen jahres. somit wäre ein run auf die 30$ wieder gegeben.
frpt hat nun aufträge im gesamtwert von 1 milliarde $!!! sprich, frpt wird den umsatz verglichen zum vorjahr ver-5-fachen... echt klasse die firma.

gebt mal ne meinung ab.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[bregenzer]

Zum nachdenken von IV

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=106287&pt=…

[enna2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.306.407 von Mr.Perfect am 27.08.07 18:41:43

"gebt mal ne meinung ab."

Gar nicht so einfach...wenn die Daten bei shortsqueeze.com einigermaßen stimmen müssten z.Z. fast 16,5 Mio Aktien leerverkauft worden sein.Wenn dem so ist gehts es entweder Ruck-Zuck...oder die Shortys halten weiter den Kurs unten.Kommt halt ganz darauf an was noch so an News reinflattert.

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.309.246 von enna2 am 27.08.07 21:44:13

die auftragslage ist ja bestens. was will man mehr.

ich denke, dass das 2te halbjahr noch besser läuft als das erste. zudem könnte ich mir einen anstieg wie letztes jahr vorstellen, einfach nun auf höherer basis.

september dürfte mM. sehr gut laufen. newsmässig wie auch chartmässig.
chart schreit förmlich nach 25-30$

habe genau auf diese umkehr gewartet und steige nun auch wieder ein

c-ya
mr.perfect

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.309.385 von Mr.Perfect am 27.08.07 21:56:18

naja letztes jahr sind wir von 2 usd auf über 30 gelaufen!!!

ich denke wir werden bis märz auf 40-45 usd marschieren!!!!


also bis märz!!!!

[coolrunning]

Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide's Tecstar Automotive Group subsidiary won a contract for design and production support for the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Cheetah vehicle series, the company said Wednesday.

The follow-up contract came from Ladson, S.C.-based Force Protection (NASDAQ: FRPT). Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Tecstar will be providing manufacturing engineering support to develop the layout of a new Force Protection plant set to produce the vehicles, along with specifying and procuring equipment and tooling, setting up the assembly line, hiring and training the workforce and managing the production line for Force Protection's Cheetah vehicle program. The contract also includes the production of the vehicles by Tecstar. The facility where the vehicles will be produced is in Roxboro, N.C.

Irvine-based Quantum (NASDAQ: QTWW) is an alternative energy company. It is involved in powertrain engineering, system integration and manufacturing of packaged fuel systems and accessories for specialty vehicles and applications.

Die Zukunft hat begonnen.
Die Weichen werden gestellt

Mal sehen, wann die dazu gehörigen Knaller-News kommen....

running

[kyron7htx]

20$ heute drin?!

[coolrunning]

Die shorties sind heute aber wieder mächtig aktiv

Irgendwann könnt Ihr uns nicht mehr aufhalten

running

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Jaja, die Shorties, wer denn sonst?

[hardy4you]

http://shortsqueeze.com/index.php?symbol=frpt

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.328.202 von hardy4you am 29.08.07 13:48:34

running

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.328.422 von coolrunning am 29.08.07 14:07:37

Force Protection, Inc. Ahead of MRAP Vehicle Production Schedule
Wednesday August 29, 4:15 pm ET


LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Leading armored vehicle manufacturer Force Protection, Inc. (Nasdaq:FRPT - News) today announced that it is ahead of its Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) production schedule for the month of August. The company has produced more than 50 Cougar vehicles to support the U.S. Department of Defense MRAP program. The Category II Cougar 6x6 vehicle commitment for August has already been shipped.
ADVERTISEMENT


"We have not yet closed August and are well ahead of our production objectives," said Force Protection COO Raymond Pollard. "This is indicative of the efficiencies of our proven manufacturing processes that are producing a proven solution which has effectively countered more than 3,000 mine detonations and IED attacks in the past four years."

The Pentagon has awarded Force Protection contracts for more than 1,900 Cougar and Buffalo vehicles to support its Category I, II, and III MRAP program requirements.

"This is also reflective of the fact that our efforts to mobilize industry resources through our partnering agreements are having their intended effects," added Pollard. "We will continue to do everything necessary to meet the needs of our customers and the men and women who depend on these vehicles."

Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo vehicle series have been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003. They have become the gold standard for troop safety, and their proven performance has formed the basis for the MRAP vehicle program. In addition to its own production capacity, Force Protection has created a joint venture with General Dynamics Land Systems to increase both capacity and deliveries under its MRAP program awards.

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070829/20070829005954.html?.v=1

[illi1]

Force Protection and MUSC to Establish Center for Brain Research


2007-08-30 09:00 ET - News Release


Company Website: http://www.forceprotection.net
LADSON, S.C. -- (Business Wire)

Force Protection (Nasdaq:FRPT), and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), announced today that they have entered into a memorandum of understanding to establish the Force Protection Center for Brain Research at MUSC.

The aim of the partnership is to foster vital research that will lead to improving the quality of life of our young men and women in uniform and also benefit others who may suffer brain trauma including Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

Objectives of the partnership include securing funding for research equipment and appropriating space, faculty and employees for the center and related research activities.

“We are extremely pleased to enter into this agreement with MUSC. This effort builds on our commitment to the men and women who serve our country now and in the future. We owe them our best effort to improve their quality of life and seek methods to prevent brain trauma so that they may enjoy the freedoms that they help to preserve,” stated Force Protection CEO Gordon McGilton.

"We, at the Medical University, feel privileged to be able to partner with Force Protection to help protect the health and safety of the men and women serving our country. By combining the medical research expertise of the University, with the engineering expertise of our corporate partners, we can assure that all of the relevant knowledge is brought together to produce the safest possible vehicles," said MUSC President Ray Greenberg.

About Force Protection

Force Protection is a leading blast and ballistics research and manufacturing enterprise, specializing in the development and production of vehicles that are designed to save the lives of troops around the world by shielding them from the deadly effects of roadside bombs, or IEDs, which have become the leading killer of U.S. troops in Iraq. Our vehicles have become the gold standard and the in-field performance of our Cougar and Buffalo vehicles is unmatched in the industry, standing as evidence that not all v-shaped hulls are created equally. Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. Visit the company’s website at www.forceprotection.net.

About MUSC

Founded in 1824 in Charleston, The Medical University of South Carolina is the oldest medical school in the South. Today, MUSC continues the tradition of excellence in education, research, and patient care. MUSC educates and trains more than 3,000 students and residents, and has nearly 10,000 employees, including 1,300 faculty members. As the largest non-federal employer in Charleston, the university and its affiliates have collective annual budgets in excess of $1.3 billion. MUSC operates a 600-bed medical center, which includes a nationally recognized Children's Hospital and a leading Institute of Psychiatry. For more information on academic information or clinical services, visit www.musc.edu or www.muschealth.com.

This release may contain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning our business, future plans and objectives and the performance of our products. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties ultimately may not prove to be accurate. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The company cautions that these forward looking statements are further qualified by factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in the company's Form 10-K filing and other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (available at http://www.sec.gov) and the company's public statements. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any statements in this release, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.


Contacts:

[meier1]

Komisch---Pagitz hat sich schon länger nicht gemeldet........

Zwei Bayern sitzen sich im Zugabteil gegenüber. Der eine liest

Zeitung, der andere schaut aus dem Fenster.

Plötzlich reißt der eine seinem Gegenüber die Zeitung aus der Hand und

schreit: "Haben Sie das gerade gesehen? Der Zug fuhr gerade runter von den

Schienen, über die Wiese, durch den Fluss durch, um den Baum herum und

wieder auf die Schienen drauf!!!"

"Nein", sagt der andere, "ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Wir fragen mal den

Schaffner."

Die also zum Schaffner hin...

"Entschuldigen Sie, Herr Schaffner, er hat mir gerade erzählt, der Zug wäre

gerade runter von den Schienen, über die Wiese, durch den Fluss durch, um

den Baum herum und wieder auf die Schienen drauf. Stimmt das?"

"Weiß ich auch nicht", sagt der Schaffner, "wir fragen mal den Lokführer."

Die alle zum Lokführer hin.

"Hör' mal, Kollege, er hat mir gerade erzählt, dass der da ihm erzählt

hätte, dass der Zug gerade runter von den Schienen, über die Wiese, durch

den Fluss durch, um den Baum herum und wieder auf die Schienen drauf ist'.

Stimmt das??"

"Ja", sagt der Lokführer, "da lag ein Österreicher auf den Schienen..."

"Warum hast Du den nicht überfahren??" fragt der Schaffner...

"Ja, wollte ich ja. - Aber der ist runter von den Schienen, über die Wiese,

durch den Fluss durch......"

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.347.083 von meier1 am 30.08.07 19:36:59

bin zur zeit öfters in ungarn und kaufe stückchenweise

BALATONA

auf!!!!

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.342.971 von illi1 am 30.08.07 15:31:09

nice!

[Highnoon120]

Aber Kurs bewegt sich weiter seitwärts

[topas98]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.354.363 von Highnoon120 am 31.08.07 12:31:09

was ist denn hier heute los ?
keine bewegung, kein umsatz ?
rein gar nichts ?

[Mr.Perfect]

endlich hat frpt die vergangene Woche konsolidiert.
nach dem fall bis auf rund 14$ mit anschliessendem run bis fast 19$ konnte frpt nun konsolidieren.
ich bin überzeugt dass wir kommende woche die 38-tagelinie >18$ durchbrechen und einen kleinen run bis auf 20$ zur 100-tagelinie machen. mM sieht es recht gut aus und angesichts dessen, dass frpt über 1 Milliarde umsatz generiert sicherlich mehr als ein fairer Preis.
vermute nach wie vor, dass wir wiederum einen guten frpt herbst erleben können und sicherlich bis ende jahr wieder an der 30$ kratzen werden.
was aber noch fehlt ist eine initial-zündung welcher uns in den bereich um die 22-24$ bringt. danach siehts dann wieder richig gut aus.
bin mal gespannt wie es die woche läuft.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[illi1]

Force Protection, Inc. Announces Record Production in August
Ticker Symbol: U:FRPT


LADSON, S.C. -- (Business Wire) --


Leading armored vehicle provider Force Protection, Inc.

(NASDAQ:FRPT) today announced record production numbers for the month

of August, as well as an ahead-of-schedule delivery performance on its

Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle program contracts to

date in 2007.



¶ The company produced more than 95 MRAP Category I and Category II

Cougar vehicles in August, which is well above what was required by

contract. Coupled with its sole source Category III Buffalo

deliveries, the company again sold over 100 vehicles to the federal

government. Thus far, Force Dynamics, the joint venture of Force

Protection and General Dynamics Land Systems, has produced more than

14 vehicles ahead of schedule on all of its MRAP contracts for the

year.



¶ "These reports reflect the effectiveness of our manufacturing

processes and the potency of Force Protection's joint venture with

General Dynamics Land Systems," said Force Protection Chief Operating

Officer, Raymond Pollard. "Our production lines are becoming more

efficient and ready to meet our customer's urgent program

requirements. Through long experience, we understand what is necessary

to produce a unique and critically needed vehicle platform under

extraordinary time pressure, and we will continue to bring these

expertise and experience to bear for our troops."



¶ Force Protection has received contracts from the Pentagon for more

than 1,900 Cougar and Buffalo vehicles to support its Category I, II,

and III MRAP program requirements. Force Dynamics was formed to

increase both capacity and vehicle deliveries under these MRAP program

awards.



¶ Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo vehicle series have been

deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003. They are the gold

standard for troop safety, having withstood thousands of mine

detonations and IED attacks in the past four years.



¶ About Force Protection Inc.



¶ Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the

urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected

vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose

vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it

matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and

mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These

specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside

bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies

are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are

manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force

Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.



¶ About General Dynamics



¶ General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics

(NYSE:GD), is headquartered in Falls Church, Va., employs

approximately 82,900 people worldwide and anticipates 2007 revenues of

approximately $27 billion. The company has leading market positions in

mission critical information systems and technologies, land and

amphibious combat systems, shipbuilding and marine systems, and

business aviation. More information about the company is available on

the Internet at www.generaldynamics.com.



¶ This press release contains forward-looking statements that

involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such

as "believe," "may," "could," "will," "intend," "expect,"

"anticipate," "plan," and similar expressions to identify

forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on

these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ

materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements

for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form

10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in

the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to

events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the

Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or

achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not

intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date

of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to

changes in expectations, except as required by law.
Contacts:

Policy Impact Communications

Jeff Child, 202-737-5339

[coolrunning]

WSJ article on budget for iraq

Pentagon Updates Iraq-Operations Budget
By DAVID ROGERS September 6, 2007; Page A4

WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon is updating its budget for operations in Iraq next year, anticipating a partial drawdown of U.S. forces there even as billions of dollars would go to buy heavily armored vehicles to protect the troops who remain.

The new funding request won't be completed until after the Iraq commander, Gen. David Petraeus, reports to Congress next week on the situation in Iraq. But the numbers shed light on the cost and personnel pressures facing him as well as Pentagon decision makers.

The services are asking for more than $40 billion on top of the $147 billion already requested by the White House for military operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan in the new fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

The Army, which submitted new requests of about $35 billion, would receive the greatest share, to help sustain current troop levels and operations through at least the end of the calendar year.

But the cost calculations assume that the 20-brigade force level in Iraq won't be maintained through calendar 2008 and that a drawdown of about 30,000 troops will begin by next spring. The working assumption is that the five brigades added this year as part of President Bush's "surge" strategy won't be replaced as they finish their 15-month deployments, beginning around March.

"People here are prepared to fall on their swords" rather than require that tours be extended to 18 or 19 months to maintain the current force level of about 160,000 troops, said one Pentagon official.

"Any discussion of changes in troop levels is premature," Lt. Col. Todd Vician, a Pentagon spokesman, said in an email note responding to questions about the budget request.

But Gen. Petraeus himself has suggested he is open to some reduction. In private discussions this summer, he signaled that he hoped to draw down troop levels next spring, and in an ABC News interview Tuesday, he said "the surge will run its course. There are limits to what our military can provide."

At the same time, the draft request would greatly speed funding for armored vehicles to protect troops from mines and roadside ambushes. An additional $9 billion request is being considered on top of recent appropriations and budget amendments totaling nearly $11 billion for 2007 and 2008.

The numbers underscore the pressure to pump up procurement of the heavily armored MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) vehicles. But the huge costs worry many in Congress: "People say, 'What is happening here,' " said Sen. Daniel Inouye (D., Hawaii), who oversees the Senate defense-appropriations panel.

More broadly, the new war-funding request will pose a major challenge for Democrats as they wrestle with President Bush on two fronts this fall: Iraq policy and domestic spending.

Mr. Bush has leveled multiple veto threats, vowing to roll back $22 billion added by Democrats to annual spending bills. But given the much larger costs of the war, the Democratic leadership hopes some deal can be reached.

Congress is likely to test Mr. Bush's resolve by sending him a series of packages combining three or four bills at a time.

For example, a popular veteran's health-care bill, slated to clear the Senate, is a likely engine to pull several others. And there is strong pressure to do the same with a $459.6 billion Pentagon bill covering core defense operations separate from wars overseas.

The House largely sidestepped the Iraq debate when it approved its version of the Pentagon budget bill before the August recess; Mr. Inouye hopes to do the same in the Senate, though he said he may add $5.3 billion in MRAP funds to ease passage.

But there seems little hope of a final budget deal before Thanksgiving, and much of the government will have to operate after Oct. 1 under a stopgap-funding resolution.

A big question for Democrats will be whether they can agree to attach a "bridge fund" of sorts to cover war costs as they debate the president's new request in the same period.

But both Mr. Inouye and Rep. John Murtha (D., Pa.), who will manage the war request in the House, have signaled that any new funding for 2008 is likely to be approved in three- to four-month increments to keep the pressure on the administration for a change in policy.

Write to David Rogers at [e-mail]




running

[coolrunning]

http://defensenewsstand.com/insider.asp?issue=09052007

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2007/07/gen_conw…

.....
Which is why I was interested to see that Marine Corps Commandant General James Conway took the Cheetah for a test drive last month, according to Defense News. Conway said of the vehicle,

“I’m excited about the latest addition to Force Protection’s family of MRAP Vehicles, the Cheetah...If it proves itself through further testing, the Cheetah will offer the same survivability rates as its predecessors, but it’s also designed to be relevant beyond Iraq. The Cheetah will be easier to rapidly deploy, as it will be much more compatible with air and sea transport than larger MRAP vehicles currently in production."
.......

running

[wohinistmeinGeld]

das läuft ja perfekt an der Abwärtstrendlinie entlang, können die 15 wieder mal getestet werden.

[Gexe006]

More than 30 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles sit in a lot here waiting for authorization from Headquarters Marine Corps to be transported to units throughout Al Anbar province. 2nd Supply Battalion, 2nd Marine Logistics Group (Forward), makes sure the MRAPs are shipped to the right units and handles parts needed to sustain the gear.
Photo Credit: Cpl. Thomas J. Griffith
Photo Date: 09/04/2007

[Gexe006]

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/ver/242/popup/index.php?cl=4008…

Neues Video auf CNN
Zuerst muß man sich noch ne kurze Werbung anschauen

[meier1]

Photo Date: 09/04/2007

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.474.126 von meier1 am 09.09.07 02:12:14

September,04.2007
denke ich

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.474.126 von meier1 am 09.09.07 02:12:14

bei den Amis kommt immer der Monat zuerst.

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.483.264 von wohinistmeinGeld am 09.09.07 12:23:50

Hast recht.
In 2 Tagen haben wir ihn wieder---den september,eleventh.

[illi1]

Force Protection Public Message Campaign Highlights Unmatched Performance of Its Armored Vehicles
Ticker Symbol: U:FRPT


LADSON, S.C. -- (Business Wire) --


Leading armored vehicle manufacturer Force Protection, Inc.

(NASDAQ:FRPT) has launched a new targeted advertising campaign

designed to highlight the unmatched battlefield performance of its

Cougar and Buffalo vehicles. The ad series will run in such

publications as Armed Forces Journal, Defense News, and Military

Times, and will feature the experiences of U.S. troops who have used

them.



¶ Force Protection is the only American company whose blast- and

ballistic-protected vehicles have withstood thousands of attacks in

Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan since 1998. The company's vehicles have

come to represent the gold standard in protecting troops from the

deadly effects of IEDs, or roadside bombs, as the most advanced and

best protected battlefield solutions in the world. The print

advertising campaign, which runs from late August through November, is

timed to coincide with Force Protection vehicle exhibits at the two

largest Defense Department equipment shows, Modern Day Marine

(Quantico, VA) and the Association of the United States Army Annual

Conference (Washington, DC).



¶ "Our business is the protection of our troops facing deadly

explosive threats on a daily basis," said Force Protection Vice

President, Michael Aldrich. "We feel it is important for them to know

that there is a proven solution that is being manufactured and

delivered as quickly as possible to support them in their critical

mission. The home fires are burning for those who have placed

themselves in harm's way to defend America's national security."



¶ Testimonials from troops and their families are a prominent

feature of the campaign, illustrating the lifesaving role the vehicles

play both for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as those

who sustain them.



¶ The U.S. Department of Defense has ordered more than 1,900 Cougar

vehicles for its Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) program from

Force Protection.



¶ About Force Protection Inc.



¶ Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the

urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected

vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose

vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it

matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and

mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These

specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside

bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies

are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are

manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force

Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.



¶ This press release contains forward-looking statements that

involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such

as "believe," "may," "could," "will," "intend," "expect,"

"anticipate," "plan," and similar expressions to identify

forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on

these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ

materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements

for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form

10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in

the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to

events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the

Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or

achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not

intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date

of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to

changes in expectations, except as required by law.
Contacts:

Policy Impact Communications

Jeff Child, 202-737-5339

[coolrunning]

Hier mal in Breitwand-Format
10.09.2007 15:04
Force Protection Public Message Campaign Highlights Unmatched Performance of Its Armored Vehicles Leading armored vehicle manufacturer Force Protection, (Nachrichten) Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT) has launched a new targeted advertising campaign designed to highlight the unmatched battlefield performance of its Cougar and Buffalo vehicles. The ad series will run in such publications as Armed Forces Journal, Defense News, and Military Times, and will feature the experiences of U.S. troops who have used them.

Force Protection is the only American company whose blast- and ballistic-protected vehicles have withstood thousands of attacks in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan since 1998. The company's vehicles have come to represent the gold standard in protecting troops from the deadly effects of IEDs, or roadside bombs, as the most advanced and best protected battlefield solutions in the world. The print advertising campaign, which runs from late August through November, is timed to coincide with Force Protection vehicle exhibits at the two largest Defense Department equipment shows, Modern Day Marine (Quantico, VA) and the Association of the United States Army Annual Conference (Washington, DC).

“Our business is the protection of our troops facing deadly explosive threats on a daily basis,“ said Force Protection Vice President, Michael Aldrich. “We feel it is important for them to know that there is a proven solution that is being manufactured and delivered as quickly as possible to support them in their critical mission. The home fires are burning for those who have placed themselves in harm's way to defend America's national security.“

Testimonials from troops and their families are a prominent feature of the campaign, illustrating the lifesaving role the vehicles play both for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as those who sustain them.

The U.S. Department of Defense has ordered more than 1,900 Cougar vehicles for its Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) program from Force Protection.

About Force Protection Inc.

Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such “believe,“ “may,“ “could,“ “will,“ “intend,“ “expect,“ “anticipate,“ “plan,“ and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in expectations, except as required by law.

[DollarPenny]

The U.S. Department of Defense has ordered more than 1,900 Cougar vehicles for its Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) program from Force Protection.

Schöööön!!


$$$$$$$$$$$$

[coolrunning]

http://www.j3sg.com/Reports/Stock-Insider/generate-Instituti…

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.buyins.net/tools/short_list.php?ssd=20070910


Rec 34 ! FRPT

running

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.522.082 von DollarPenny am 11.09.07 09:42:32

jep das war wichtig.... der kurs wollte schon wieder richtung 15... man kann es derzeit sehr gelassen sehen

[Mr.Perfect]

mann, mann,... weiss momentan echt nicht was man von frpt halten soll.
das volumen ist seit ende august rückläufig. der kurzfristige aufwärtstrend konnte sich nicht halten und nun dümpeln wir um die 16,5$ herum...
auftragslage etc. ist nach wie vor bestens und wir können uns auf super jahreszahlen freuen. bis dahin gehts noch ne weile und ich will endlich wieder leben in dieser aktie sehen.
ist dies momentan der boden und sehen wir bis ende jahr einen erneuten rebound richtung 30$??
es gibt momentan nicht viel zum schreiben.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[fragmatiker]

hat jemand eine Idee warum das Volumen bei den Amis so stark zurück gegangen ist?

Wegen den vielen Instis? => Aktien in festen Händen?

Wegen der Kredit Krise? => Banken und Fonds brauchen das Geld an anderer Stelle?

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.566.218 von fragmatiker am 13.09.07 21:01:32

Ich denke mal bei FRPT ist alles eingepreist.
Der Kurs ist in 15 Monaten fantastisch gestiegen - die Erwartungen waren teilweise zu hoch, was den prozentualen Anteil am MRAP-Aufträgen betrifft.
Trotzdem ist die Auftragslage sehr gut und der jetzige Kurs stellt das dar, was FRPT hat. Hier ist m.E. noch keine Fantasie eingepreist, daher ging der Kurs ja auch von Höchstständen wieder runter.
Wenn die ersten Cheetah-Aufträge kommen und weitere andere Bestellungen, dann sehen wir mindestens wieder die alten Höchststände, wenn nicht sogar mehr...

Und ich bleibe bei meiner These der Übernahme. Dann haben wir noch etwas andere Kurse.

running

[wohinistmeinGeld]

naja, wie immer, Freitag ist ein guter FRPT-Tag.

[microby]

FRPT, ein Geschäft mit dem Krieg.
Was macht die Firma wenn die USA vernünftiger werden?


FRIEDENSGEDICHT

Wenn der Frühling läßt empor
Hoch den Himmel steigen,
Summt es in uns wie ein Chor
Nach des Winters Schweigen:
Friede, Friede sei auf Erden!
Menschen wollen Menschen werden.


0 du dunkler Chor, der summt
In uns ist ein Ahnen:
Sie, die glaubten wir verstummt,
Melden sich und mahnen:
Menschen sollen Menschen werden!
Friede, Friede sei auf Erden.

Und es ist ein solcher Schrei,
Daß die Berge beben,
Eine Flammenwüstenei,
Meere sich erheben,
Wenn nicht Friede wird auf Erden,
Was soll aus uns allen werden?

Ihr, gezeichnet von dem Leid
Derer, die gefallen,
Und ihr, die ihr jung noch seid,
Laßt den Ruf erschallen:
Friede, Friede sei auf Erden!
Menschen laßt uns Menschen werden!

Johannes R. Becher

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.636.534 von microby am 17.09.07 20:30:09

wenn die USA vernünftiger werden?

Null Chance--die werden nicht vernünftiger.
Bush wird schon wieder dafür sorgen,daß die alten Wahlmaschinen so programmiert sind,daß ein passender Nachfolger als Präsident gewählt wird.
Zudem kommt Bush Rußlands derzeitige Aufrüstung sehr entgegen.

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.636.534 von microby am 17.09.07 20:30:09

solltest Du eigentlich wissen wenn Du hier schreibst, die USA wollen ihre ganzen Humvees gegen geschützte Fahrzeuge austauschen und da gibt es noch ein paar

Ansonsten gibts hier zur Zeit nicht viel zu sagen

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.638.498 von Gexe006 am 17.09.07 23:39:10

doch!

Kurs knabbert an der unteren Grenze des Bollinger-Bandes, sprich die untere Grenze befindet sich um 15,5$
wir sollten eigentlich nicht tiefer laufen als die 15,5$ und eher wieder abprallen.
bin gespannt, da wir diese woche sicherlich diese entscheidung sehen werden. ich denke mal, wenn wir unterhalb von 15,5$ schliessen werden wir nochmals kurse bis 14$ sehen.
ansonsten kanns schnell wieder auf die 18 gehen. sind dann auch gute 15% Gewinn.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.639.685 von Mr.Perfect am 18.09.07 09:01:03

vieleicht sollten wir noch einmal auf die 14 gehn und damit ein schönes W ausbilden um anschließend den Abwärtstrend gen Norden zu verlassen
Denke aber vor Oktober wird sich hier nicht viel tun

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.639.685 von Mr.Perfect am 18.09.07 09:01:03

18$ ist ein guter Anfang!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.639.685 von Mr.Perfect am 18.09.07 09:01:03

tja, man wird bescheiden.
Es läuft perfekt an der Abwärtstrendlinie seit Ende Mai entlang, jedesmal wenn es sich die Nase daran anschlägt machts einen Satz nach unten. Im logarithmischen Chart besonders gut zu erkennen.

[coolrunning]

Army wants 10,000 new armored vehicles
By Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — The Army has decided to ask for 10,000 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected armored vehicles to counter the threat of makeshift bombs in Iraq, according to one of the program's top congressional supporters.
The new request is nearly four times the 2,700 vehicles, known as MRAPs, that the Army had sought. That's still not enough, said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who was briefed on the change by the Defense Department. Biden cited a request this year for 17,770 of the vehicles for the Army by Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the No. 2 military commander in Iraq.

"Until every soldier and Marine has the best protection we can give them, we must keep pushing," Biden said.

Requests for more MRAPs may not matter, because manufacturers don't have the capacity to make them fast enough, said Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., chairman of the House subcommittee that writes the Pentagon budget. John Young, chairman of the Defense Department's MRAP Task Force, has said the Pentagon hopes to build 1,300 a month by December.

Army and Pentagon officials declined Tuesday to comment on the new MRAP request. So far, the Pentagon has ordered 6,500 MRAPs, valued at about $5 billion.

The cost of the Army's new vehicles is unknown, because the newest MRAPs will cost more than the current $1 million each. They will be required to have extra protection against deadly armor-piercing weapons known as explosively formed penetrators.

The Army has changed its estimated MRAP needs throughout the year. Initially, it sought about 2,500, while the Marines wanted 3,700. In May, Defense Secretary Robert Gates pushed the Army to consider buying more MRAPs and made them the Pentagon's top purchasing priority.

In June, an Army team determined it needed 17,770 MRAPs, enough to replace all of its armored Humvees. Days later, however, the Army backed away from that number pending further study.

Gates cited the Marines' success with them in Anbar province. The V-shaped hulls disperse the force of explosions away from the vehicles' center and provide greater protection for troops inside.

Planned MRAP purchases have also depended on future projections for U.S. troops in Iraq. Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, told Congress last week that he anticipated having 130,000 troops in Iraq by July 2008. Gates said he hoped the overall troop level would fall to 100,000 by January 2009.

"This is an acknowledgement that we'll be in Iraq for a long time and that we need to replace every Humvee there," said Loren Thompson, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va.

running

[DollarPenny]

Also nachkaufen!

Schöne Preise guter Kurs!

[DollarPenny]

pari 11,5€

[bregenzer]

Aus IV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXAj0oGeZZ0

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.657.909 von bregenzer am 19.09.07 11:34:09

bin mal gespannt ob wir heute über 16$ schliessen werden.
die zeichen stehen eigentlich recht gut. aber man weiss ja nie, wie es kommt.
ich bin sehr optimistisch, dass wir bis ende jahr deutlich über der 20$ marke liegen werden.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[topas98]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.658.924 von Mr.Perfect am 19.09.07 12:25:31

solange es sogenannte börsianer gibt, die
hier wie heute morgen für 11.00 euro verkaufen
glaube ich nicht an ein ansteigen in den nächsten
tagen
aber hoffentlich tut es ihm wohl......

[bregenzer]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXjDKKo6Ips&mode=related&sear…

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=110082&pt=…

running

[DollarPenny]

es geht rauf

pari 11,9€

[coolrunning]

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_full.asp?mode=&kind=shortin…

running

[coolrunning]

Die liebe Melissa hat sich auch mal wieder gemeldet - dann kann es jetzt wieder nach oben gehen, hahaha...

Business News
By Melissa Davis Senior Writer
9/20/2007 6:06 AM EDT

OKLAHOMA CITY -- Force Protection (FRPT) fans have high hopes for the next stage in the government's armored-vehicle procurement effort.


Billions of dollars will be at stake in a program now widely called MRAP II. The big-budget sequel to the Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected vehicle program funds the purchase of vehicles that can protect U.S. soldiers deployed overseas from threats like mines and bombs.

Force Protection landed a big role in the original MRAP program. But with the curtain set to rise on MRAP II, Force Protection may be forced to share the spotlight with deep-pocketed rivals including Navistar (NAVZ) and a new venture formed by Oshkosh (OSK) and Ceradyne (CRDN) .

Ladson, S.C.-based Force Protection believes it is up to the task, but some observers suspect the result will be even more pressure on Force Protection's once-highflying stock.

"Even as talk of pulling out of Iraq grows louder, the military has been recruiting other, bigger contractors to help with production," The Wall Street Journal noted earlier this month. "The big companies are diversified builders of everything from ships and Gulfstream jets to dump trucks, while tiny Force Protection largely owes its existence to building MRAPs for the U.S. military's campaign in Iraq. ... More than its rivals, Force Protection's volatile shares waver on the news of MRAP awards going to other contractors."

Just compare the stock charts of General Dynamics (GD) and Force Protection, for example. The two companies rank as equal partners in a joint venture competing for MRAP awards. But General Dynamics depends on MRAP business far less, so it trades within a few dollars of its all-time high. Force Protection, up 7 cents to $15.98 on Tuesday, has lost half its stock-market value after hitting a record earlier this year.

That steep decline actually emboldens Force Protection bulls, though.

"The stock is cheap virtually no matter what [earnings] assumptions one makes," C.E. Unterberg Towbin analyst James McIlree said last month. "This is the type of environment the [big players] wait for to make acquisitions, when a stock tumbles and much of the risk has been taken out of the shares."


McIlree has a buy recommendation and a $32 price target on Force Protection's stock. His firm has investment banking ties to the company.


Looking ahead, McIlree calls MRAP II "the next battlefield" for Force Protection. Given its strong performance and production record so far, he feels that Force Protection should enjoy a definite edge in that fight.


Meanwhile, Force Protection has been loudly reminding the military of its strengths. This summer, the company launched an advertising campaign targeting the likes of Defense News and Military Times that touts "the unmatched battlefield performance" of its popular MRAP vehicles.

"Our business is the protection of our troops facing deadly explosive threats on a daily basis," stated Force Protection Vice President Michael Aldrich. "We feel it is important for them to know that there is a proven solution that is being manufactured and delivered as quickly as possible to support them in their critical mission."


Force Protection has been making those claims for some time, even as rivals like Navistar have managed to land huge contracts and meet tough production deadlines to boot.


Going forward, two newcomers -- Oshkosh and Ceradyne -- hope to snag a piece of the action as well. Their new vehicle, known as the Bull, can withstand hits from powerful "explosively formed penetrators" and is therefore considered an early favorite for MRAP II awards. Still, the companies are realistic about their odds.


"While Oshkosh is optimistic about its chances to play a larger role in MRAP II ... it believes that competitors currently building MRAP I vehicles may have an advantage," Robert W. Baird analyst Robert McCarthy wrote this month. Still, "management appears confident it has learned from its MRAP I experiences and that its proposal for MRAP II will be considerably stronger."


McCarthy has an outperform rating and a $75 price target on Oshkosh's stock, which rose 3.5% to $56.55 on Tuesday. His firm has investment banking ties to the company.


Ceradyne, which tapped Oshkosh as its partner earlier this year, clearly expects the Bull to burst onto the MRAP scene. The company -- already the top supplier of body armor for U.S. soldiers in Iraq -- stands to pick up some new followers if that happens.

"Vehicle armor represents a large new potential market," Morgan Joseph analyst Michael French stressed when initiating coverage of Ceradyne last month. French, whose firm seeks to do business with the companies it covers, has a hold recommendation on Ceradyne now -- but he indicates that could change.

"If ... the company is successful in its vehicle armor initiatives -- and that becomes evident this fall -- we would become more aggressive on the shares," he wrote.

running

[coolrunning]

Die ersten Berichte aus/in Deutschland für FRPT !
Nun kann es auch hier mit dem Kaufvolumen losgehen - ich hätte nichts dagegen

aus ITnews:

In SolidWorks konstruiertes Minenräumfahrzeug als Top-Act im Film Transformers

Haar bei München, 19. September 2007 – Ein mit der 3D-CAD-Software SolidWorks und der Konstruktionsanalyse-Software COSMOSWorks entwickeltes Minenfahrzeug ist Top-Act im neuen Film „Transformers“. Ursprünglich von Force Protection als Lebensretter entwickelt, hat das Minenräumfahrzeug in der Hollywood-Produktion die Rolle des bösen Decepticon Bonecrusher übernommen.

Das Minenräumfahrzeug Buffalo MPCV wird seit 2003 weltweit zur Minenräumung eingesetzt. Mit dem langen, hydraulischen Arm, der am vorderen Ende mit einer Art Rechen bestückt ist, können Sprengkörper aufgelesen werden. Vor einigen Monaten machte sich das Fahrzeug auf die Reise in die Filmstudios von DreamWorks, wo Ingenieure und kreative Köpfe das über 8 Meter lange, 3 Meter breite und 4 Meter hohe Fahrzeug mit einem Gesamtgewicht von 23 Tonnen begutachteten. Anschließend konstruierten sie ein digitales Modell, das als Bonecrusher in Bewegung gesetzt wurde.

„Es ist schon toll, dass eine Konstruktion unseres Unternehmens als Ausgangspunkt für eine Filmfigur dient“, sagt Derek Parker, Engineering Section Manager der Capsule Group bei Force Protection. „So martialisch der Transformer im Film auch aussieht, für die Aufgaben, die Buffalo MPCV im realen Leben zu erfüllen hat, muss das Fahrzeug noch stabiler sein als im Film. SolidWorks und COSMOSWorks ermöglichten uns, unzählige Konstruktionsvarianten zu sondieren und sicherzustellen, dass das Fahrzeug robust genug ist und den extremen Einsatzbedingungen standhält.“

Force Protection setzt 94 Lizenzen der SolidWorks Software ein, um die Konstruktion einer breiten Fahrzeugpalette für militärische Anwendungen zu verbessern. Mit SolidWorks und COSMOSWorks erzielt das Unternehmen drastische Einsparungen bei Entwicklungszeit und Produktionskosten, da viele Fahrzeugprototypen digital am Computer erstellt und getestet werden. „Wir können jetzt sehen, ob Komponenten, wie beispielsweise Motorlager oder Gelenkwellen, innerhalb der geforderten Toleranzen bleiben und so ein sicheres und zuverlässiges Fahrzeug gewährleisten. Mit der Software sparen wir Zeit und können uns auf die Entwicklung des besten Ansatzes konzentrieren. Außerdem verbessern wir damit unsere Konstruktionen und verringern die Anzahl der gebauten Prototypen. Letztlich beginnen wir früher mit der Endproduktion. Somit können wir die sonst ernormen Kosten auf ein Minimum beschränken“, erläutert Parker. Weitere Vorteile von SolidWorks sind laut Parker unter anderem die intuitive Benutzeroberfläche, die Assoziativität zur Automatisierung von Änderungen in der gesamten Konstruktion und die leicht verständlichen 3D-Modelle, die auch technische Laien interpretieren können.

Für weitere Informationen wenden Sie sich bitte an:
SolidWorks Deutschland GmbH
Isabelle Reich
Hans-Pinsel-Straße 7
D-85540 Haar
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

stautner & stautner consulting . pr . communications
Carola von Wendland
Südliche Münchner Straße 8
D-82031 Grünwald
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

Force Protection ist ein führendes Forschungs- und Fertigungsunternehmen im Bereich Sprengkörper und Ballistik. Das Unternehmen ist spezialisiert auf die Entwicklung und Produktion von Fahrzeugen, die weltweit militärische und zivile Einsatzkräfte vor Bomben oder unkonventionelle Spreng- oder Brandvorrichtungen auf der Straße schützen sollen. Die Fahrzeuge des Typs Cougar und Buffalo sind in Bezug auf ihre Leistungsfähigkeit im Einsatz branchenweit unübertroffen. Die Technologien von Force Protection für Minen- und ballistischen Schutz zählen zu den ausgereiftesten Techniken weltweit. Die Fahrzeuge werden im Umland von Charleston, South Carolina/USA, gefertigt. www.forceprotection.net

SolidWorks Corporation, ein Unternehmen der Dassault Systèmes S.A. (Nasdaq: DASTY, Euronext Paris: 13065, DSY.PA), entwickelt und vertreibt Software für Konstruktion, Analyse und Produktdatenmanagement. Als der führende Hersteller von 3D-CAD-Technologie liefert SolidWorks eine intuitive, hoch performante Software für die Konstruktion besserer Produkte. www.solidworks.de

SolidWorks ist ein eingetragenes Warenzeichen der SolidWorks Corporation. Alle anderen Marken und Produktbezeichnungen sind Warenzeichen der jeweiligen Rechtsinhaber.


running

[DollarPenny]

pari 12,34€ Auf gehts Transformers

[coolrunning]

Pentagon seeks enough MRAPs for all services
By Jeff Schogol, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Friday, September 21, 2007

ARLINGTON, Va. — Defense officials have authorized 15,274 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles for all branches of the service, nearly double their previous target, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Thursday.

Earlier this year officials had authorized 7,774 MRAPs for all of the services, including 3,700 for the Marine Corps and 2,500 for the Army. But the new authorization would allocate 10,000 MRAPs to the Army alone, Morrell said.

Morrell noted that the new requirement for MRAPs is subject to change.

“The idea here is that we think it’s best to ask for as many as we may need, and if events on the ground change such that we need fewer of them, we could always off-ramp this and end up buying fewer. But we want to make sure we have enough to meet the needs of the force to best protect them,” Morrell said.

The vehicles have V-shaped hulls that deflect blasts from underneath and have proved to withstand certain roadside bombs better than up-armored Humvees. The Defense Department plans to have 1,500 MRAPs in Iraq by the end of the year, Morrell said.

Earlier this year, the commander of Multi–National Corps–Iraq requested 17,700 MRAPs for the Army alone. On Thursday, Morrell said that figure was based on the idea of swapping all up-armored Humvees with MRAPs.

“We’ve done a closer evaluation, the joint chiefs have, and the evaluation has now suggested we need about 15,000 (for all the services),” Morrell said.

Morrell added that Defense Secretary Robert Gates has not yet signed off on the request, but said the Defense Department plans to ask Congress for funding for “many more MRAPs.”

He declined to get more specific because the Defense Department’s funding request has not yet been given to Congress.

Under the new authorized figure, the Marine Corps would still be allocated 3,700 MRAPs, the Air Force 697, the Navy 544, and U.S. Special Operations Command 333, Morrell said.

Wenn die Produktionsraten weiter erhöht werden, dann kommen auch Aufträge in ausreichender Anzahl. Force Protection baut die besten Fahrzeuge - vielleicht nicht die billigsten, aber eben die besten.
Wir sind mit der einen oder anderen verlorenen Bestellung abgestraft worden (Lieferverzögerungen !), aber nun liegt FRPT über Plan, was die Auslieferungen angeht.
Es müßten schon große "Antipathien" gegen FRPT vorliegen, sollte nicht noch ein großer Teil der Bestellungen nach Ladson gehen.

Also auf zu neuen Kurshöhen !

running

[coolrunning]

http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-3-07/feature_mrap.…

running

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.686.573 von coolrunning am 21.09.07 13:12:21

Hallo @ all,

SENATE MAY WEIGH FUNDING BOOST FOR MINE-RESISTANT VEHICLES

_____________________________________________

Date: September 17, 2007


When the Senate takes up the fiscal year 2008 defense authorization bill this week it will have before it an amendment to boost spending for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles by $25 billion to nearly $30 billion next fiscal year.


The amendment, offered by Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE) in July, would provide enough money to potentially purchase a total of 23,000 MRAPS in FY-07 and FY-08 -- 15,000 more vehicles than the administration’s FY-08 budget request would fund, when combined with already-appropriated funds. The $25 billion addition would cover other MRAP costs including added armor to protect them from explosively formed projectiles.


Biden, though, acknowledged in a Sept. 4 letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates that industry may not be able to build all 23,000 MRAPs by the end of FY-08.


Biden’s amendment calls for adding $25 billion in MRAP spending to the FY-08 defense authorization bill passed in May by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which calls for spending $4.6 billion on the vehicles next fiscal year. The FY-08 defense authorization bill passed by the House in May also calls for spending $4.6 billion on MRAPs.


The Bush administration’s MRAP request is included in an FY-08 global war on terrorism supplemental spending request, which asked for $441 million for MRAPs when it was first submitted to Congress in February.


The Pentagon, though, is now seeking $5.8 billion in the FY-08 war supplemental budget request for MRAPS -- a move that would bring the fleet of vehicles close to the 8,000 number defense officials have been citing as a production target.


In addition, the Pentagon is planning to increase the MRAP requirement to 14,000 vehicles, and officials are preparing another MRAP spending request worth $9 billion to $10 billion, InsideDefense.com reported Sept. 10.


It is not clear, however, if Congress will pass the supplemental appropriations bills before FY-08 begins Oct. 1.


© 2007 Inside Washington Publishers
Reproduction or redistribution forbidden without express permission of the publishers
http://defensenewsstand.com
NAVY-20-37-8

Das sind nun wirklich BIG NEWS!!
Es geht jetzt nur noch darum was FPI in den nächsten Jahren an Stückzahlen bauen kann.

Ich wage mal eine kurze Prognose für 2008:
500 Vehicle/Monat*12*ca.500.000$/Vehicle = 3,0 Mrd $

Der Kurs wird das ganze natürlich vorwegnehmen und schon die nächsten Monate reagieren.

gruss
charlie01

[coolrunning]

http://www.militaryindustrialcomplex.com/totals.asp?thisCont…

1 Mrd. Umsatz....


Wir sind aber wieder mal dran mit neuen Aufträgen.

Noch im September ???

running

(Ich bleibe bei meiner früheren Aussage: Vor 30-35 € verkaufe ich nicht)

Dies ist keine Kaufempfehlung

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.687.545 von coolrunning am 21.09.07 14:28:58

35€ ist auch mein Kursziel, jedoch werde ich nicht meinen gesamten Bestand zu diesem Preis verschleudern.

[Mr.Perfect]

ich bin sehr überzeugt dass wir nun wieder richtung norden laufen.
aktuell siehts ja schon recht gut aus.
für nächste woche wäre dann mal 200-tagelinie dran, bzw. zuerst der durchbruch des bollingerbandes bei 18,25$
frpt stimmt mich sehr positiv und bin nun fest überzeugt, dass wir den rebound auf 30$ bis ende jahr schaffen.
mir gefällts und ich legt mir nächste woche noch weitere stücke ins depot.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=110628&pt=…

Hier sieht man mal wieder, wie einfach es sein kann, mit geringen Stückzahlen den Kurs zu drücken...

Aber Ihr shorts werdet brennen !

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
18:47 $ 17.50 100
18:46 $ 17.58 100
18:46 $ 17.55 400
18:46 $ 17.57 100
18:46 $ 17.50 100
18:46 $ 17.50 200
18:09 $ 17.60 100
18:06 $ 17.62 100
16:46 $ 17.72 400
16:46 $ 17.64 300
16:46 $ 17.64 1,100
16:46 $ 17.64 800
16:26 $ 17.725 10,924
16:20 $ 17.73 10,924
16:19 $ 17.71 3,986
16:10 $ 17.648 3,400

Die Produktion läuft auch über den normalen Rahmen:
The company produced more than 95 MRAP Category I and Category II Cougar vehicles in August, which is well above what was required by contract. Coupled with its sole source Category III Buffalo deliveries, the company again sold over 100 vehicles to the federal government. Thus far, Force Dynamics, the joint venture of Force Protection and General Dynamics Land Systems, has produced more than 14 vehicles ahead of schedule on all of its MRAP contracts for the year.


Und neue Aufträge werden in Kürze verteilt:
The Pentagon is asking Congress for the approval to fund the urgent acquisition of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles by transferring nearly $1.2 billion, in addition to the four billion already earmarked for the program, to speed up production and delivery of vehicles to US troops in Iraq by the year’s end. The additional funding will enable the program manager to expedite orders for 2,650 ahead of schedule, bringing the department’s total MRAP order to 6,415. “By the end of the year, we hope to have delivered 3,935 vehicles” said John Young, director of defense research and engineering and chairman of the Defense Department’s MRAP task force. Factoring in the time required to equip those vehicles with jammers, communication equipment and other gear and to deliver them to the theater, Young estimated that about 3,500 of the MRAPs will be in Iraq by Dec. 31.

Also, Federal Gov't. fiscal year ends next week so the "Spend It Or Lose It" contract deadline may force some awards in the next 5 days i.e. the NAV ILS award yesterday.

Wollen wir hoffen, das FRPT dabei ist.


running

[Gexe006]

http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-3-07/feature_mrap.…

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/23/america/military.php

[DollarPenny]

In USA am Freitag 11.189.800



Jetzt gehts nach Norden!

[fragmatiker]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.716.849 von DollarPenny am 24.09.07 08:44:43

sollen das die aktuellen Shortzahlen sein?

[coolrunning]

Über 18 $ - sieht gut aus.

Naja, der Weg geht auf 30-35 $... da muss ja auch langsam was passieren...

[Mr.Perfect]

fragt sich nur in welchem zeitraum.

es steht ja noch einiges an bzw. offen.

alles was über 18,5$ geht sollte uns schnell richtung 22-24$ bringen.

bin gespannt.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.723.961 von Mr.Perfect am 24.09.07 16:19:57

Morgen steht das hier an:

http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/asp/short_interest_resp.asp?symb…


...und dann kurzfristig Big New's!!!

Heute sollten wir nahe 19$ schliessen.

[coolrunning]

Schwacher handel in D

Haben viele noch nicht begriffen, das der große rebound bevor steht bzw. angefangen hat

Ich lehne mich entspannt zurück...

running

[Gexe006]

Press Release Source: Force Protection, Inc.


Force Protection, Inc. Announces New Director and Officer Appointments
Monday September 24, 5:48 pm ET


LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT - News) today announced that it has appointed John S. Day to serve as a member of the board of directors. The appointment was effective September 18, 2007.
ADVERTISEMENT


Day has more than 30 years' experience in accounting and has served a broad range of publicly owned clients with financial transaction, underwriting counsel, and SEC response expertise. He joined Arthur Anderson in 1976 and was admitted as audit partner in 1986.

In 2002, Day became a Director of real estate and financial services for Deloite and Touche, LLP. He was appointed to the board of Lenbrook, LLC in 2007. Day holds an AB degree in Economics from the University of North Carolina and a Master's of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School.

"John will be a tremendous asset to our operations," said Force Protection CEO Gordon McGilton. "He has a wealth of hands-on accounting experience that is the right fit at the right time for this company."

In addition to Day's appointment, McGilton named Michael Moody to be the company's president on September 18, 2007.

Moody is a veteran with more than 40 years of senior management experience in operational management, reorganizations, acquisitions and business transformation. He has served as a principal for Westsource Financial Services, Inc. where he provided business and financial advisory services to privately held businesses from 2005 to 2007.

Moody was the COO at the London American General Agency from 2003 to 2005 and served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Magna Carta Companies from 1995 to 2001, where he also served on the Board of Directors. Moody is a CPA with extensive domestic and international investment banking experience, and holds a Bachelor's of Arts in Economics from Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.

"Force Protection is fortunate to benefit from Michael's exceptional skill set and background," said McGilton. "He has served the company well as a member of the board and we look forward to his leadership as president."

Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo armored vehicles are the gold standard for troop safety in Iraq and Afghanistan, and have withstood thousands of mine detonations and IED attacks since 2003. The company is one of the main suppliers for the U.S. Department of Defense MRAP program.

[coolrunning]

Anniston Star:
Area contractors may build more MRAP vehicles for U.S. military
By Todd South
Star Staff Writer 09-25-2007
Defense contractors in the Anniston-Oxford area soon could be building some of the additional armored vehicles the U.S. military says it needs.

Department of Defense officials have more than doubled the requested number of Mine-Resistant-Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles in next year's war-fighting budget.

General Dynamics Land Systems, headquartered in Falls Church Va., runs a plant in Oxford that currently produces the Cougar, an MRAP vehicle used by the Army.

The vehicles are heavily armored trucks that carry troops and supplies in combat areas.

The trucks have a V-shaped hull which helps to deflect bomb blasts from mines and roadside Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) commonly used against coalition forces.

The department made its original 2008 budget request in February, which included the Global War On Terror (GWOT) supplement.

The department added $5.1 billion for the MRAP vehicles, which brought the GWOT portion to $147 billion, said Lt. Col. Brian Maka, a department official.

That figure looks to be adjusted and likely will be billions more when the official request is announced Wednesday by the department.

Maka said he could not discuss the exact figure until it is announced, as the number is subject to change.

The military originally asked for 7,774 total MRAP vehicles. It has since increased that number to 15,274, according to transcripts from a department press conference Thursday.

General Dynamics is in a joint venture with Force Protection Inc., a South Carolina-based vehicle manufacturer.

According to a company press release, General Dynamics received a $111.5 million order in July to produce 235 MRAP vehicles for the United States Marine Corps.

Peter Keating, vice president for communications at General Dynamics, said money for building the vehicles is paid to five defense contractors, each of which makes different variants of the MRAP.

"It's not a winner-take-all situation," Keating said.

Armor Holdings Inc., in Jacksonville, Fla., and BAE Systems Plc., in London, also provide MRAP vehicles for the U.S. military.

As for who will get what orders on the vehicles and how much money will ultimately come through, that is still unknown.

Sheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokesperson, said a lot of the final funding outcome depends on what Congress approves, what the needs are on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan, and which companies win the contracts.




About Todd South Todd South covers Clay, Randolph and Cleburne counties and Oxford for The Star. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia. He served five years in the Marines and participated in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Contact Todd South Phone:
Fax:
E-mail:
256-235-3548
256-241-1991
[e-mail]



running

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.731.772 von Gexe006 am 25.09.07 00:49:28

Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo armored vehicles are the gold standard for troop safety in Iraq and Afghanistan, and have withstood thousands of mine detonations and IED attacks since 2003. The company is one of the main suppliers for the U.S. Department of Defense MRAP program.

Was macht eigentlich unsere Konkurrenz, insbesondere Navistar?
Sind von dem International® MaxxPro™ schon welche geliefert oder
schon im Einsatz? Man sieht und hört nix.

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.734.400 von charlie01 am 25.09.07 11:22:20

Die dicken Aufträge sind toll, aber ich bezweifle, das Navistar das in den fristen hinbekommt.

Also erst einmal abwarten....


Schaun wir mal, wo heute die Reise hingeht.... 20 $ ??

running

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.737.597 von coolrunning am 25.09.07 15:38:49

Schaun wir mal, wo heute die Reise hingeht.... 20 $ ??

Sieht schon mal ganz gut aus.

Stichwort "Reise", schau dir mal die Produktionsstätte in Roxboro mit
Google Earth an. Im Moment ist der Parkplatz dort komplett leer.
Sollte sich bald ändern.

[pagitz01]

more than doubled!!!!!

das is der einzig wichtige satz der in denn nächsten 12-18 monate kurse zwischen 45-60 usd ohne split rechtfertigt!!!!

[LisaS]

FRPT macht wieder seinen Weg Richtung Norden...

[carpediem2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.739.049 von pagitz01 am 25.09.07 17:09:58

Hier wird jetzt endlich wieder mehr investiert, statt spekuliertschau die Umsätze und der Weg stimmt,
Meine einzige Sorge ist der Dollarkurswenn wir nächstes Jahr die 60$ sehen sind mir aber 1:1,50 auch egal.....dann weiss ich wenigstens wo ich Urlaub mache

[Mr.Perfect]

das war aber ein geiler run die letzten handelstage

gut das wir die 200-Tagelinie genommen haben. somit dürfte frpt wieder in den bullishen bereich gekommen sein.
das bollingerband hat sich die tage richtig zusammen getan und frpt ist nun in die positive richtung ausgebrochen.

bis zur 22$ marke sollte es nun weiter ohne probleme während diesen wochen laufen. ich könnte mir gut vorstellen dass wir aber bereits ende oktober anfangs november an der 30$ knabbern werden.

was jetzt noch fehlt ist ein guter cheatah-vertrag...

bin gespannt ob wir diese woche die 20$ nachhaltig hinter uns lassen....


c-ya
mr.perfect

[kyron7htx]

Pre market 20.26$ / 20.48$

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.749.623 von kyron7htx am 26.09.07 15:14:07

das bedeutet 14,5€ pari.

sieht gut aus!

[mc-plop]

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey on FPI - Why the recent move

We believe shares of FRPT have been strong recently due to the
positive potential impact of delays in the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
(JLTV) program and expectations that fall MRAP contracts will be awarded
soon. Not only do we expect FRPT to be a significant beneficiary of
these fall MRAP awards, but we also believe there is a high probability
that the number of vendors supplying vehicles under MRAP will be
narrowed from 5 to 3 with FRPT playing a major role.

*
Impact of JLTV Delay - According to InsideDefense.com, the
Pentagon recently decided to halt the competition for JLTV due to
skepticism about procurement strategy and timeline. In our opinion, this
move benefits FRPT in two ways. First, it likely extends the longevity
of the MRAP program which could mean MRAP production extends beyond
2008. Second, it allows more time for FRPT to complete the development
of its Cheetah vehicle, see it fielded domestically and internationally,
and continue the spiral development process to add capabilities.
Although Cheetah is not officially the JLTV, a delay in JLTV opens the
door for FRPT to begin capturing this market well before JLTV arrives.

*
Fall Awards Could Come Soon - The military is well aware of the
six month lead time associated with materials procurement for MRAP
vehicles. With industry expected to run out of backlog in February or
March 2008, we expect the DoD to award relatively small contracts early
in October to keep production lines hot in March and April with
substantially larger awards in November after the FY08 supplemental is
approved. To date, orders for about 6,400 vehicles have been placed. In
October, we expect to see awards for 1,500 to 2,000 vehicles followed by
awards for 7,000 vehicles in November. As mentioned, we expect FRPT to
be a significant beneficiary of these awards.
*
Narrowing of Competition Likely - With these new awards, we also
expect to see the competitive field narrowed to three vendors with FRPT
and Navistar likely as the dominant players followed by BAE as a smaller
third player. Consequently, FRPT's "market share" of MRAP should once
again increase, providing a significant positive catalyst for the stock.
We reiterate our Buy rating and recommend accumulating shares of FRPT
prior to these awards.

Please feel free to call or email with questions.

Best regards,
Chris



Chris Donaghey

[playerbig]

bin ich denn heut der einzigste gewesen der in deutschland gekauft hat einmal in münschen und einmal in frankfurt
naja bin ja gespannt was dabei rauskommt iss zwar schon wieder ganz schön gestiegen aber bis jahresende sollten wir bei den allzeithochs wieder angekommen sein also abwarten
zumindest ist es ja besser wenn wenige kaufen bei solchen werten wenn sie steigen da sind die wenigstens net gepuscht und stürzen auch nicht so schnell in den 0, bereich wieder ab

[kyron7htx]

21,XX $ . Heute ein 10 Prozenter?!

[kyron7htx]

21,50$

[enna2]

Wie in "alten Zeiten"

Jetzt rächst sich wohl das enorme Short Volumen der letzten Wochen und Monate...mir solls recht sein...

[Gexe006]

[DollarPenny]

dann sind die 35$ nicht mehr weit! Werde heute nochmal schön nachlegen!

[coolrunning]

A Force To Be Reckoned With (FRPT)
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 17:24ET

Glenn Curtis

Aug 15, 2007 (Investopedia via COMTEX) -- Over the last several years, countless American and allied troops have been killed in the field by roadside bombs. Thankfully, countless other American and allied lives have also been saved thanks to a company called Force Protection (Nasdaq: FRPT ).

You may have never heard of Force Protection, but the odds are good you have heard about or seen some of the items that the company makes. Force Protection operates behind the scenes, fashioning trucks with armored plating and other security features meant to weather IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) and other man-made weapons of death. Every once in a while, the company will get a little bit of press, usually from an embedded journalist on a remote battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Forceful Fundamentals

The company recently turned in some pretty decent second quarter numbers, and on that note I think it deserves more than just a passing glance. The company generated $134.7 million in revenue, a roughly 140% increase over last year, and earned 14 cents per share during Q2. In addition, it managed to post a roughly 600 basis point improvement in gross margins thanks mostly to improved labor and material costs. Overall, it seemed to be a very solid quarter. The company has also reported some additional good news since its earnings were released on August 9. Force Protection has inked a contract with the U.S. Navy for 125 armored vehicles, said to be worth almost $70 million. Going forward, I suspect that Force Protection is likely to land similar contracts from both federal and state agencies.

More Than Just a Good Quarter

Of course there are other things that I like about the company. Over the past quarter the company was awarded contracts totaling $711 million to produce just over 1,400 security vehicles for the U.S. Marine Corps. The company is branching out internationally, where significant growth opportunities may lie. It announced its first Canadian contract, worth about $8.9 million, to produce armored and mine resistant vehicles for the Canadian Expeditionary Force Command. In July, the company was granted a $50 million credit facility by Wachovia Bank (NYSE: WB ) so it can continue to build its business and to help fill any voids caused by government payment schedules.

Future Earnings On Target

Based upon the recent inflow of business and expected shipments over the next year, Wall Street expects that the company will earn 63 cents per share this year and $1.42 per share in 2008. While it is a bit too early to say whether Force Protection can hit the 2008 target, I think it is a reasonable target given both the order volume and the improvement in margins the company has been experiencing. That said, there are still some big risks to this story. Governments are typically regarded as slow payers. Going forward, this could present the company with cash flow issues. Although, hopefully credit lines such as the one with Wachovia will help to alleviate any financial stress. As well, the defense industry is filled with deep-pocketed players such as General Dynamics (NYSE: GD ) who have a knack for garnering the biggest and the best government contracts.

The Bottom Line

Force Protection makes the stuff that our soldiers and security forces need to protect themselves. For this reason, I think the company is very well positioned for the future.

Diese PR brauchen wir....

[coolrunning]

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1866279/

running

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.757.721 von coolrunning am 27.09.07 08:28:20

ich denke zuerst wird mal dss gap geschlossen bevor wir weiter gehen!!!

wir haben 2 up-gaps!!!!!

wäre am besten für denn kurs!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.761.255 von pagitz01 am 27.09.07 12:48:15

We will see!!!

Aber erst mal das hier:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/1866296

und

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070927/clth041.html?.v=101

Denke eher es geht weiter hoch!!!

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.761.255 von pagitz01 am 27.09.07 12:48:15

ehrlich gesagt halte ich nicht viel von diesen GAP's.

denke, dass wir bis morgen abend bzw. nächster woche bei 24$ stehen werden. dort ist, soweit ich noch weiss, auch ein knackpunkt gewesen bzw. widerstand.

kommt gut, denn die kaufkraft ist nach wie vor wieder recht gross.

c-ya
mr.perfect

[coolrunning]

Fette Blöcke heute:

45400
42000
198000
32795
19188
28640
18160


Es kommt weiter Bewegung rein...



running

[meier1]

Man sage nur---SCHEIBENHONIG---denn so war das nicht "geplant".

Pagitz,hättest du mal deine up-gaps nicht ins Spiel gebracht.

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.770.998 von meier1 am 28.09.07 00:49:09

Solche Tage hast du immer dabei.

Denk dran: es gibt auch die Gegenseite mit gegensätzlichen Interessen

Man sollte bei FRPT Langfristig ausgerichtet sein.
Lass uns mal im März 2008 wieder über den heutigen Stand von ca. 15 € reden...

running

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.771.866 von coolrunning am 28.09.07 09:04:33

Also immer cool bleiben!!! Ganz wichtig.
Muß schon ehrlich zugeben, das ich nicht damit
gerechnet habe, das wir von 30$ auf 15$ konsolidieren.

An dem folgendem Chart kann sich jeder ausmalen wohin die Reise geht.
Im PTSC Thread gibt es für so etwas "Spezialisten", die bunte Striche
in so was zaubern.



Ab jetzt werde ich mich hier nur noch zurücklehnen!!!

Allen einen schönen Tag.

[DollarPenny]

das sind immernoch nachkaufkurse!

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.775.863 von DollarPenny am 28.09.07 13:36:35

der 5 tages chart schreit ja förmlich nach gap-close auf alle fälle wäre es besser!!!!!

[hardy4you]

...schöner SK, gute Woche, geiles WE!

[sampler]

Was war denn da drüben in den letzten 45 min los?

Man könnte ja glauben, dass es am Montag keine Force-Aktien mehr gibt


sampler

[wohinistmeinGeld]

was wird denn da heute für ein Mist angezeigt.
Bei Consors 97000 St Kurs 21,66
Bei WO 580000 St gleicher Kurs
aber bei advfn 1,3 Mio St, Kurs aber nur 20,99

Was stimmt denn nun
Consors ist ja wohl total daneben.

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.783.663 von wohinistmeinGeld am 28.09.07 23:14:02

Sep. 28, 2007 Market Closed
Common Stock Market : NASDAQ-CM
Last Sale: $ 21.66 Net Change: 0.77 3.69%
Share Volume: 1,294,393

So steht es bei Nasdaq.com
ADVFN kann man nicht immer zu 100% trauen

After Hours Trade Reporting

After Hours
Last: $ 21.70 After Hours
High: $ 21.85
After Hours
Volume: 17,925 After Hours
Low: $ 21.0003

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
17:24 $ 21.70 1,250
16:44 $ 21.85 100
16:43 $ 21.66 4,000
16:26 $ 21.6573 414
16:26 $ 21.66 2,171
16:26 $ 21.6627 300
16:25 $ 21.66 2,030
16:24 $ 21.67 1,682
16:24 $ 21.0003 3,200
16:09 $ 21.1175 100
16:07 $ 21.64 100
16:07 $ 21.64 563
16:07 $ 21.65 300
16:04 $ 21.66 1,715

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.783.735 von Gexe006 am 28.09.07 23:33:16

[coolrunning]

Senate Passes MRAP Amendment, Bringing Funding to $28.2 Billion
Sept. 28, 2007 -- The Senate last night passed an amendment to the fiscal year 2008 defense authorization bill that calls for boosting spending on Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles to more than $28 billion.
The amended authorization bill, which the full Senate has not yet approved, would provide enough money to allow the Pentagon to purchase up to 23,000 MRAPs for all of the services in FY-07 and FY-08.
The amendment -- a modified version of one filed by Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE) in July -- calls for boosting spending for MRAP vehicles by $23.6 billion. Added to $4.6 billion for MRAPs in the version of the defense appropriations bill that has already cleared the Senate Armed Services Committee, the amendment would increase MRAP spending to $28.2 billion.
Biden's modified amendment calls for the added $23.6 billion to fund 15,200 MRAPs for the Army, fully funding the service's stated need for 17,700 MRAPs.
In May, Army Lt. General Raymond Odierno, the commander of Multi-National Corps-Iraq, �requested approximately 18,000 vehicles to replace all of the up-armored humvees in Iraq� for the Army, said a Democratic aide. �We provided enough funding to get that done.�
The Marine Corps is managing the fast-paced effort to buy MRAPs for all of the services. The vehicles have design features including V-shaped chassis that provide better protection from roadside bombs than humvees do.
Biden acknowledged in a Sept. 4 letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates that industry may not be able to build all 23,000 MRAPs by the end of FY-08.
The aide said Biden wants to ensure the Pentagon has enough money up front to buy the MRAPs, instead of coming back to Congress for additional funding boosts.
If it turns out we gave them a little too much, we can reprogram it or rescind it, the aide said. All we can do to push the process is put the money up front.
We have no higher obligation than to protect those we send to the front lines, Biden said in a statement. While we argue in Washington about the best course of action in Iraq, our troops on the ground face improvised explosive devices, rocket-propelled grenades, explosively formed penetrators, sniper fire, and suicide bombers every day.
The Pentagon has requested $5.8 billion in an FY-08 war supplemental budget request for MRAPs -- a move that would bring the fleet close to 8,000 vehicles. Yet Gates on Wednesday told lawmakers that request will be revised to $11 billion, an amount that would fund a total MRAP fleet of approximately 15,000 vehicles. The request described by Gates would pay for 10,000 MRAPs for the Army, instead of the 18,000 vehicles, the aide said.
The FY-08 defense authorization bill before the Senate would, by contrast, help fund a total of 23,000 MRAPs, with 18,000 for the Army.
The Joint Requirements Oversight Council in late August and early September moved to raise its requirement for MRAPs to 15,374, InsideDefense.com reported Sept. 20.
MRAP spending in the FY-08 defense authorization bill will likely be hashed out by congressional negotiators in conference committee because the version of the legislation that cleared the House in May calls for $4.6 billion for the vehicles.
September 28, 2007
Inside Washington Publishers

running

[Regiomontanus]

Laut einem Artikel aus der FAZ vom 28 sollen 17 700 MRAPs gebaut werden.
Kann mir jemand sagen, inwieweit die Kapazitäten von Force Protection den Ansprüchen gerecht werden?

Gruß, Regiomontanus

[mc-plop]

Gutes Posting aus IV:

It does have to pull back EVENTUALLY. You have to remember that it was extremely oversold and undervalued for months. $21-$22 is fair value based on estimated 2008 EPS. If something moves from undervalued to fairly valued, that doesn't automatically mean that it has to pull back, especially if there are proper catalysts in place to continue to drive the PPS higher.

There are many catalysts to drive FRPT higher with little to no pullback. I thought it was going to go back and test the 200 DMA Thursday or yesterday, but it showed buyers were there to limit the downside. Now that we know the DoD is authorized to purchase 15,000 more MRAP vehicles by the end of 2008, one major point of uncertainty has been removed. The funding for the vehicles is there. A contract may well be announced after-hours Monday. Production numbers are out next week, likely Monday. I'm assuming that the development of the Cheetah production facility is going well, as we haven't heard anything different. The shorts are exiting. Cheetah contracts could come at any time. MRAP II will be kicking off soon. JLTV has been delayed for years, so the procurement of JLTV-like vehicles (read: Cheetah) will likely be rolled into MRAP II. It's all coming together now, and there should be so much news by the end of the year your head will spin. IMO< this is the worst time to be out of FRPT altogether. I plan on buying some at the open, or even in the pre-market Monday morning.

Be grateful you're long. We've all seen stocks run from $10 to $50 with little to no pullbacks along the way. I would prefer to see a slow, steady rise in the PPS w/ the appropriate pullbacks along the way, but unfortunately due to the nature of the business, it will likely continue to be a choppy ride at least until a large portion of the short interest has been covered. Good luck to the longs here. Congrats on a great week last week, and I look forward to many more weeks like it between now and the end of the year.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.785.865 von Regiomontanus am 29.09.07 15:29:56

Geplant sind bis Frühjahr 08 200 Fahrzeuge pro Jahr mit Ausbau bis 400 Pro Jahr bis Ende 2008.

Bei entsprechender Nachfrage könnte FRPT in Kooperation mit anderen Herstellern laut FRPT-Management 1000 Fahrzeuge pro Monat produzieren.

Also Kapazität wäre genug da.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.787.454 von mc-plop am 29.09.07 21:37:45

upps kleiner Fehler, meine natürlich 200 bis 400 Fahrzeuge PRO MONAT

[______]

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEA492BA0F6EB4F8EB7D198F099C02407/Doc…

Rüstungswerte

Aktie von General Dynamics: Kriegsgewinnlerin


Ein Produkt von General Dynamics
28. September 2007
Die Welt ist manchmal pervers. Das gilt insbesondere auch für die der Börsianer. Denn so etwas wie moralische Werte lassen sich in ihr selten bis überhaupt nicht finden. Was zählt, das ist in der Regel nur der schnöde Mammon. Und der sollte im Sinne gieriger Anleger möglichst schnell und in möglichst großen Mengen aufs eigene Konto laufen.

Idealisten mögen sich darüber aufregen, aber so funktioniert nun einmal die Welt. Das zeigt sich auch am Beispiel der Rüstungsindustrie. Mögen ihre Produkte noch so viel Leid über die Menschheit bringen, so floriert das Geschäft so lange Regierungen wie die amerikanische ihre Rüstungsbudgets auf Pump immer weiter aufblähen.

Sicherheits- und Rüstungswahn sorgt für steigende Erlöse und Gewinne


Die operative Entwicklung bei Unternehmen wie Force Protection oder dem Branchenriesen General Dynamics spricht entsprechende Bände. Denn beide Unternehmen profitieren unter anderem vom Sicherheitswahn weltweit, der in den vergangenen Jahren um sich gegriffen hat und auch von den anhaltenden Konflikten im Irak und in Afghanistan. Immerhin wurden gerade dort in den vergangenen Monaten die Investitionen noch einmal erhöht und die Stationierung ausländischer Truppen wird sehr wahrscheinlich länger dauern als viele ursprünglich erwartet haben. Alleine im Jahr 2008 will das Pentagon in diesen beiden Regionen 190 Milliarden Dollar ausgeben.

So dürfte es kaum verwundern, dass sowohl die Umsatz- als auch die Ertragsentwicklung bei General Dynamics schon seit Jahren im Trend nach oben laufen. Im vergangenen Geschäftsjahr konnte der Umsatz um 14,7 Prozent auf etwas mehr als 24 Milliarden Dollar gesteigert werden, der Nettogewinn legte um 27 Prozent auf 1,86 Milliarden Dollar zu. Im laufenden Jahr konnte der Gewinn je Aktie im ersten Quartal um 13 und im zweiten sogar um 23 Prozent gesteigert werden. Das Umsatzwachstum lag bei 14 und elf Prozent.

In den vergangenen fünf Jahren hat sich der Umsatz von General Dynamics mit Gefechtsausrüstung mehr als verdoppelt, das Munitionsgeschäft mit berücksichtigt. Vergangenes Jahr lag dieser Umsatz bei 5,98 Milliarden Dollar. Der Gesamtumsatz des Konzerns belief sich auf 24,1 Milliarden Dollar, er war damit 20 Prozent höher als im Jahr 2002. Der Export von Waffentechnik ins Ausland läuft nach Ansicht von Analysten gut. Der Verkauf von leicht gepanzerten Fahrzeugen und Kampfpanzern nach Saudi-Arabien werde das Ergebnis ankurbeln, heißt es.

Aktie vernünftig bewertet im Aufwärtstrend

Von manchen Investoren übersehen wird auch ein starkes Wachstumssegment, das keinerlei Bezug zum Militär hat: Der Verkauf von Geschäftsflugzeugen. General Dynamics produziert unter der Marke Gulfstream sechs Business-Jet-Versionen. Das Geschäft ist sehr profitabel. Der Umsatz der Luftfahrtsparte lag im vergangenen Jahr bei 4,12 Milliarden Dollar und hat 17 Prozent zum Gesamtumsatz beigetragen. Der Umsatzanteil war damit beinahe so hoch wie jener der Schiffsbausparte. Dort wurden im vergangenen Geschäftsjahr mit dem Bau und der Wartung von U-Booten und anderen Fahrzeugen immerhin 4,94 Milliarden Dollar umgesetzt.

Mit einem Anteil von 37,5 Prozent am Gesamtumsatz und Erlösen von etwas mehr als neun Milliarden Dollar ist der Bereich der Informationssysteme jedoch die größte Sparte des Unternehmens. Das dürfte kaum verwundern. Denn zunehmend spielt die Vernetzung der verschiedenen militärischen Einheiten und die effiziente Koordination eine Rolle. Aus diesem Grund dürfte dieser Bereich gute Wachstumsmöglichkeiten bieten.

Mit Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnissen von 17,3 und 15,3 auf Basis der Gewinnschätzungen für das laufende und das kommende Geschäftsjahr ist die Aktie vernünftig bewertet. Da kaum anzunehmen ist, dass die Vereinigten Staaten ihr Militärbudget in den kommenden Jahren deutlicher einschränken wird, dürfte die Aktie unsensiblen Aktionären auch künftig noch Kursphantasie bieten.

Die in dem Beitrag geäußerte Einschätzung gibt die Meinung des Autors und nicht die der F.A.Z.-Redaktion wieder.


Text: @cri
Bildmaterial: AP, FAZ.NET

[coolrunning]

MRAP Kills JLTV
September 30, 2007: The U.S. Army and Marine Corps are in the process of spending $20 billion to buy over 20,000 MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) vehicles. While the troops appreciate this, some the generals see serious problems in the future, all because of the rush to buy lots of MRAPs. But for the moment, people in bomb resistant vehicles are much less likely to be killed or injured if they encounter a roadside bomb. Thus if all the troops who encountered these bombs were instead in a bomb resistant vehicle, casualties would be about 65 percent less. About half the casualties in Iraq are from roadside bombs. Thus the army and marines want to use these vehicles in areas most likely to have bombs, and reduce overall casualties by about a third.


The most common MRAPs in service are the Cougars. This vehicle, and the larger Buffalo, are more expensive to operate, and less flexible than the hummer, even an armored hummer. But MRAPs save lives. The Cougar and Buffalo vehicles use a capsule design to protect the passengers and key vehicle components mines and roadside bombs. The bulletproof Cougars and Buffalos are built using the same construction techniques pioneered by South African firms that have, over the years, delivered thousands of landmine resistant vehicles to the South African armed forces. These were a great success in the 1980s. The South African technology was imported into the U.S. in 1998, and has already been used in the design of vehicles used by peacekeepers in the Balkans. Basically, MRAPs are heavy trucks (12 tons or more) that are hardened to survive bombs and mines, and cost about five to tem times more than an armored hummer. Several hundred of the current fleet MRAPs are Buffalos. This is a 23 ton vehicle, which is actually a heavily modified Peterbuilt Mac-10 truck. Costing $740,000 each, about the same as the smaller Cougar, they have added armor protection to keep out machine-gun bullets.



MRAPs are more expensive to maintain and operate than the hummer. That is seen as a major problem in the future. Another problem is that the large number of roadside bombs are a situation unique to Iraq. Once American forces are out of Iraq, the military would not need all these MRAPs. But these vehicles are popular with many NGOs, and nations that have problems with rebel movements. So the U.S. could sell some of them, at used vehicle prices, to those buyers. Otherwise, they could be put in storage, because the higher operating costs, compared to hummers, would make for a highly embarrassing issue in the mass media.



But with as many as 20,000 MRAPs on hand, keeping them in storage may not be an option. As a result, the U.S. Department of Defense has halted work on designing the hummer replacement (the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle or JLTV). Part of this is the fear that roadside bombs may become a persistent threat in the future. Of course, roadside bombs and anti-vehicle mines have been around for over a century. What has really changed here is the ability of American ground forces to greatly reduced their combat casualties, making losses from roadside bombs into a major source of losses. The mass media is largely innumerate and exploitatitive, so they ignore all other issues that impact troop safety (larger accident rate and less mobility, plus bomb detection and electronic warfare) because of armored trucks, and focus on only one aspect (protection from explosions). This eventually has an effect on government policy making, as in the halting of work on JLTV.


running

[coolrunning]

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID…

running

[coolrunning]

Force Protection Rolls Again
By Melissa Davis
Senior Writer

After slipping into reverse this summer, Force Protection (FRPT - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating) is on a roll again.

Force Protection's stock has been zooming forward, rising 30% over the past two weeks alone amid mounting hopes for new orders of the company's popular Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected vehicles. With the U.S. government set to approve billions of dollars in new funding for MRAP vehicles -- and the military halting plans for a rival vehicle program -- Force Protection could soon see demand for its powerful trucks grow even stronger.



While it faces stiff competition from Navistar (NAVZ - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr) and a new duo formed by Ceradyne (CRDN - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating) and Oshkosh (OSK - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating), Force Protection enjoys some major opportunities right now. The U.S. is currently fielding bids for so-called MRAP II vehicles, with the first orders expected to be placed as early as next month. Meanwhile, the government has delayed a high-profile Humvee-replacement program -- calling for new "Joint Light Tactical Vehicles" -- and potentially opened new doors for Force Protection in the process.



"In our opinion, this move benefits FRPT in two ways," SunTrust Robinson Humphrey analyst Chris Donaghey wrote on Wednesday. "First, it likely extends the longevity of the MRAP program, which could mean MRAP production extends beyond 2008. Second, it allows more time for FRPT to complete the development of its Cheetah vehicle, see it fielded domestically and internationally and continue the spiral development process to add capabilities.

Although Cheetah is not officially the JLTV, a delay in JLTV opens the door for FRPT to begin capturing this market well before JLTV arrives."

Donaghey recommends buying Force Protection's stock, which he values at $36 a share, in anticipation of big gains. His firm has investment banking ties to the company.

Sneak Preview

Force Protection shares, which fetch around $21 following their September rally, peaked above $30 a share this spring, when the company still looked poised to monopolize the MRAP program. But the stock lost serious ground as competitors, such as Navistar and BAE, started winning big contracts.

Still, under MRAP II, some foresee a better scenario ahead.

"We ... expect to see the competitive field narrowed to three vendors, with FRPT and Navistar likely as the dominant players followed by BAE as a smaller third player," Donaghey wrote this week. "Consequently, FRPT's market share of MRAP should once again increase, providing a significant positive catalyst for the stock."

But some see a fresh competitor bursting onto the MRAP scene instead. They feel that the new Ceradyne-Oshkosh team -- touting a next-generation MRAP vehicle known as the Bull -- will snag some big orders going forward.

Certainly, the two companies themselves feel optimistic enough. JMP Securities analyst Jason Simon noted as much after paying a visit to Ceradyne's military vehicle manufacturing center in Michigan this summer.

For starters, Simon stressed, Ceradyne has hired a strong manager with "extensive experience in bringing vehicles from prototype to production." Meanwhile, he said, Ceradyne has already welcomed Oshkosh engineers to its own vehicle armor facility and integrated the computer design systems for both companies. Moreover, he added, Ceradyne has leased a big new production facility and started lining up suppliers to boot.

"Our takeaway from the visit was very positive, as it indicated that Ceradyne has all the components in place that position it favorably for a vehicle armor award," wrote Simon, whose firm makes a market in the company's securities. "With the potential for short-term catalysts in the near future, [including] the company's first major vehicle armor order, we believe Ceradyne's currently depressed stock price offers investors an attractive entry point."

Thus, he stated, "we maintain our market-outperform rating and $85 target price" on the shares.

Ceradyne's stock, hit by concerns about the company's body armor business this summer, fetched less than $65 a share at the time of Simon's report. But it has since recovered strongly and currently trades near the high end of its 52-week range.

P.S. Even in a recession, this stock could still make you money!

Cramer believes this stock is undervalued, recession-proof and poised to deliver +30% in the next year, regardless of the state of the economy. Click here to discover Cramer’s pick FREE.

running

[fragmatiker]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.803.569 von coolrunning am 01.10.07 13:31:34

hahah Melissa Davis - wie ein Fähnchen im Wind.

Wahrscheinlich ist sie oder Cramer jetzt ihre Short Position los.

zizizi

[coolrunning]

22,50 $ ein guter Anfang für heute....

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.805.167 von coolrunning am 01.10.07 15:41:46

naja auf alle fälle hat der chart sehr viele lücken bis 18,50 diese gaps könnten ja auch noch geschlossen werden !!!!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.805.353 von pagitz01 am 01.10.07 15:51:35

Sieht momentan nicht danach aus. Kurs 23$ aktuell.

Der Chart kann von mir aus Lücken ohne Ende haben - hier wird nix mehr geschlossen!

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.805.683 von charlie01 am 01.10.07 16:10:38

23,15 $

[edeka1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.805.353 von pagitz01 am 01.10.07 15:51:35

Hallo,

ich hoffe für dich, das du dich die letzten Monate nicht rausschütteln hast lassen.

Wie sagte Brasi immer, PC aus und eine Flasche Jacky

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.805.867 von edeka1 am 01.10.07 16:21:34

keine sorge ,diesmal hab ich es richtig gemacht

[Gexe006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.806.059 von pagitz01 am 01.10.07 16:32:43

US Senate approves $23.6 bln for MRAPS for Iraq
Mon Oct 1, 2007 9:16pm EDT
Email | Print | Digg | Reprints | Single Page | Recommend (0) [-] Text [+] Market News
Global stocks hit record on subprime relief
Gold hits 28-year peak, platinum near all-time high
Nikkei up 1.2 pct, led by exporters and financials
More Business & Investing News... Featured Broker sponsored link
¥ € $ - Learn. Practice. Trade.WASHINGTON, Oct 1 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Monday approved $23.6 billion in additional funding for mine-resistant armored vehicles as part of a mammoth defense spending bill for the 2008 fiscal year that began Monday.

The bill passed by a vote of 92 to 3 and now heads into conference negotiations with the House of Representatives.

As written by the Senate Armed Services Committee, the $648 billion bill already included $4.1 billion for Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, whose V-shaped hulls can dramatically reduce U.S. troop deaths from roadside bombs.

But senators approved an amendment by Sen. Joe Biden, a Delaware Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee, that adds $23.6 billion in funding for the vehicles.

That funding level would allow the U.S. Army to replace all of its up-armored humvees in Iraq with MRAPs, Biden said.

He said roadside bombs are responsible for 70 percent of U.S. troop deaths in Iraq, and MRAPs could reduce those deaths by more than two-thirds.

"We have no higher obligation than to protect those we send to the front lines," Biden said in a statement. "While we argue in Washington about the best course of action in Iraq, our troops on the ground face improvised explosive devices, rocket propelled grenades, explosively formed penetrators, sniper fire, and suicide bombers every day."

The Pentagon has already funded or requested 8,000 MRAPs, but Defense Secretary Robert Gates last week asked for $11 billion more to expand MRAP purchases.

MRAPS can hold four to twelve people and their hulls protect soldiers better from explosions than up-armored humvees. Continued...
Lawmakers from the Senate and House of Representatives will now enter into negotiations to iron out differences between the two bills.

For instance, the Senate added $115 million to the Army's request of $3.7 billion for its Future Combat Systems modernization program, while the House cut the program's funding by $867 million.

The Senate policy bill authorizes the money to be spent, but the Pentagon will have to wait until Congress passes a separate appropriations bill before war funds are transferred to military coffers.

MRAP contractors include:

-- Navistar International Corp.'s (NAVZ.PK: Quote, Profile, Research) International Military and Government LLC;

-- Force Protection Inc. (FRPT.O: Quote, Profile, Research), which is partnered with General Dynamics Corp.'s (GD.N: Quote, Profile, Research) Land Systems business arm;

-- a General Dynamics Canadian unit;

-- BAE Systems Plc (BA.L: Quote, Profile, Research);

-- Oshkosh Truck Corp. (OSK.N: Quote, Profile, Research);

-- closely held Protected Vehicles Inc. of North Charleston, South Carolina; (Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa)

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKN013495462007…

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.806.059 von pagitz01 am 01.10.07 16:32:43

irgendwann machts doch jeder richtig

ich bin auch schon lange wieder dabei und diesmal für meine verhältnisse doch ziemlich dick drin....
egal, interessiert hier keinen...^

bin mal gespannt wo wir bis freitag stehen. es sollten ja noch die produktionszahlen am 4.okt. kommen. könnte mir gut vorstellen, dass wir zudem mal endlich wieder einen vertrag sehen werden und zwar einen richtig fetten....


c-ya
mr.perfect

[Highnoon120]

Die 20€ Marke kommt wieder in Sicht

[coolrunning]

23,70 $ - sieht wieder gut aus....

Mal sehen ob die shorts noch kommen....

Eine Order-Meldung und es geht richtig ab....

running

[coolrunning]

News !!!!!

Force Dynamics, LLC Breaks Production Records in September
Tuesday October 2, 9:02 am ET

LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Force Dynamics, LLC--a joint venture between leading defense manufacturers Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT - News) and General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE:GD - News)--today announced record vehicle production numbers for the month of September.
ADVERTISEMENT


Force Dynamics produced more than 115 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I and Category II Cougar vehicles in the past month, exceeding delivery objectives and MRAP contract requirements. To date, Force Dynamics is ahead of schedule on its Category I and Category II MRAP competitive contracts for the year.

"We are pleased to note that our production and delivery performance continues to surpass expectations," said Force Protection CEO Gordon McGilton. "Our long experience has shown us which manufacturing processes and methods best lead to success in producing this life-saving technology. Combining these efforts with the expertise and capacity of General Dynamics has resulted in a potent partnership that is getting this battlefield solution to the warfighter faster than ever before."

The Pentagon has ordered more than 1,900 of Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo vehicles to support its MRAP program requirements to date.

The Cougar and Buffalo vehicle series have been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003, and have withstood thousands of explosive attacks.

About Force Protection Inc.

Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.

About General Dynamics

General Dynamics Land Systems, a business unit of General Dynamics (NYSE:GD - News), designs, manufactures and supports land and amphibious combat systems for the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, and allied nations. Headquartered in Falls Church, Va., General Dynamics employs approximately 82,900 people worldwide and expects 2007 revenue of approximately $27 billion. The company is a market leader in mission-critical information systems and technologies; land and expeditionary combat systems, armaments and munitions; shipbuilding and marine systems; and business aviation. More information on General Dynamics can be found online at www.generaldynamics.com.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such as "believe," "may," "could," "will," "intend," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in expectations, except as required by law.


running

[Gexe006]

To meet goal, DOD must send nearly 370 MRAPs per month to Iraq
By Jeff Schogol, Stars and Stripes
Online edition, Wednesday, October 3, 2007



Jason Robertson / USAF
U.S. Air Force personnel prepare to load Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles onto a C-5 Galaxy assigned to the 436th Air Wing, Dover, Air Force Base (AFB), Del. at Charleston AFB, S.C., in August.


ARLINGTON, Va. — The Defense Department has to send nearly 370 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles per month to Iraq in order to meet its goal for 2007.

That is almost four times the number of vehicles the Pentagon was able to send to Iraq in September.

Known as MRAPs, the vehicles have V-shaped hulls that deflect blasts from underneath. They have proven to hold up better against roadside bombs than up-armored Humvees.

The Defense Department originally hoped to send 3,500 MRAPs to Iraq this year, but later revised that estimate to 1,500.

As of Oct. 2, about 390 MRAPs have been sent to Iraq so far this year, said Defense Department spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin.

Industry delivered 365 MRAPs to the government in September, but U.S. Transportation Command flew just 101 of the vehicles to Iraq that month, Irwin said.

Irwin explained that before MRAPs can be sent downrange, they need to have extra equipment such as radios installed at the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center in Charleston, S.C.

“The average for that is about 50 days, and SPAWAR is trying to reduce that time period as we progress,” Irwin said.

In August, the Marine general officer in charge of procuring MRAPs for all of the services said there was no bottleneck at SPAWAR.

“Is there a backlog? No. There’s a normal amount of vehicles in the queue, both in receiving at SPAWAR, then in integration, then in preparation for shipment, so we’re keeping up,” said Brig. Gen. Michael Brogan, head of Marine Corps Systems Command.

But Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said recently that the chairman of the Defense Department’s MRAP task force is pushing SPAWAR to speed up the time it takes to install the additional equipment.

“No one is satisfied yet with the amount of time it is taking to insert all the equipment that we need in these vehicles, and so they are constantly being pushed to cut down how long it takes and to do so,” Morrell said in a Sept. 26 news briefing.

Morrell also said the Defense Department plans to begin shipping MRAPs to Iraq by both sea and air beginning this month or November.

TRANSCOM and U.S. Central Command are still waiting for formal approval of a plan to fly more than 300 MRAPs per month to Iraq, said TRANSCOM spokeswoman Cynthia Bauer.

Meanwhile, the number of MRAPs flown to Iraq dropped from 120 in August to 101 in September.

Asked why, Bauer said: “We fly what we have. We fly what vehicles are available for transport.”

MRAP manufacturers said they expect to continue to increase production of the vehicles through the end of the year.

Force Protection Industries Inc. delivered 116 MRAPs in September and expects to be able to make 160 MRAPs in October, 275 in November and 355 in December, said Michael M. Aldrich, the company’s vice president of marketing and government relations.

International Military and Government LLC provided the government with 111 MRAPs in September, up from 77 in August, said company spokesman Tim Touhy. The company plans to make 500 MRAPs per month by December.
Despite efforts to build MRAPs and fly the vehicles downrange, some commanders in Iraq have said recently that their troops are still waiting for MRAPs.

Troops in Multi-National Division-North are expected to begin receiving MRAPs for missions other than route clearance in mid-November, said Col. David W. Sutherland, commander of U.S. forces in Diyala province.

“The MRAP will be a great force protection enhancer once it becomes available to all our troops here in Diyala. We have confidence in our equipment and I know my Soldiers will welcome having this new vehicle here in Iraq,” said Sutherland, commander of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division.

E-mail Jeff Schogol at [e-mail]

[coolrunning]

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
19:53 $ 24.15 175
19:47 $ 24.12 225
18:44 $ 23.99 250
17:17 $ 24.12 1,174
17:16 $ 23.99 1,000
16:19 $ 24.14 100,000
16:17 $ 23.8105 2,200
16:01 $ 24.12 100
16:00 $ 24.12 110


Wieder mal nachbörslich ein schöner Block !

running

[tenere660]

läuft jetzt beständig in kleinen Schritten immer weiter nordwärt

Das gefällt mir - mal schaun ob wir die alten Höchststände jetzt schon toppen können.

[coolrunning]

Force Protection brings Cheetah — lots of wow factor — to chamber event - 9/29/07
By PHYLISS BOATWRIGHT, C-T Staff Writer

The Golden Corral restaurant was packed Wednesday morning, as what appeared to be most of Person County turned out to hear details about the latest industry to locate here.
Executives from Force Protection Inc., the South Carolina-based producer of armored, advanced mine protected vehicles, offered a DVD and PowerPoint presentation to explain what the company is and what it plans to do in the former Collins & Aikman Elm Plant here. Executive Vice President Dan Busher then opened the floor to questions.

Force Protection purchased the 430,000-square-foot C&A plant in July, when it announced that it would eventually hire 270 people here to produce the Cheetah, the company’s next generation MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) vehicle.

On Wednesday, Busher told the Roxboro Area Chamber of Commerce Coffee Hour crowd that 12 people were already on the Force Protection payroll here. The first Roxboro “team members” were hired on Aug. 27, Busher said. Six of the employees are salaried and six are hourly. Nine of the 12 are currently at work, and the other three will begin next week.

Busher said the company plans to have the first phase of plant upfitting completed by Oct. 8 and that the first vehicle assembly should take place during the fourth quarter of this year. The company is currently interviewing for assemblers, he said.

By mid-2008, Busher said, the company hopes to have its first Cheetah complete and ready to ship from the Roxboro plant.

The Cheetah is designed specifically for reconnaissance, forward command and control, and urban operations, and combines state-of-the-art ballistic and blast protection with the mobility of a light-armored vehicle. Its speed and road handling make it ideal for homeland security missions, Busher said.

The company expects to produce 2,000 of the vehicles over the next year

The company’s greatest need here soon will be for skilled welders, Busher said. The company is working closely with Piedmont Community College and the Employment Security Commission to fill the slots for, not only welders, assemblers and painters but office and clerical workers, warehouse, shipping and receiving, records and tracking, material planning, human resources, safety and other support jobs.

Busher ticked off the various job categories in response to a question by Person County Department of Social Services Director Beverly Warren, who also asked if the “softer skills” jobs of cleaning and building and grounds maintenance would be done by Force Protection employees or if the company would contract for those types of services.

Busher said there would be “a number of opportunities” in those areas for both Force Protection employees and contractors, but that “the larger number will be direct employees” of the company.

When asked if many jobs here would require security clearance from the military or government, Busher said that some would need clearance, but he added that few who work in the South Carolina operations need clearance.

Job opportunities will be posted on the Force Protection Web site, www.forceprotection.net, said Busher, and at the ESC office here in Roxboro. Announcements will also be made through PCC, he said.

Busher assured his large audience, “Force Protection intends to be a long-term community partner. We will be active in charitable initiatives,” he said, “and are confident that we will meet or exceed the employment numbers we first announced” in July.

Busher told Personians that he and the entire Force Protection team felt honored to play a part in keeping U.S. troops safer.

“We can’t wrap our arms around our troops,” he said, “but we can wrap them in our steel.”

Every one of Force Protection’s more than 1,000 employees recognizes that “lives depend on our vehicles,” Busher said. “The safety of our troops is not our business. It is our cause.”

Busher added that he and the company were “very excited to be in Roxboro to build the Cheetah.”

He thanked Jim Stovall, chair of the Roxboro-Person County Economic Development Board and county Economic Development Commission Director Glen Newsome for taking “a lot of time to understand” the company and its needs. Busher added that the leadership and cooperation of Roxboro city government and the county commissioners were appreciated as well.

In 2003, Force Protection produced 11 armored vehicles. Last year, 295 Buffalo and Cougar vehicles were produced at the Ladson, S.C. facility near Charleston.

The Buffalo is used for clearing land mines, Busher explained, and the Cougar comes in four-by-four and six-by-six models for use by explosive ordnance teams.

“Our products have been tested in the field,” Busher said, by soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The U.S. armed forces plan to replace the Humvees currently in use by soldiers in the Middle East, Busher said, between 2009 and 2011, and the Cheetah will likely be the vehicle of choice, he said. There are now over 180,000 Humvees in service, Busher said.


http://www.roxboro-courier.com/newsnowstories/ts092907-3.htm

running

[coolrunning]

After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
17:02 $ 24.08 100
16:20 $ 24.07 100,000
16:14 $ 24.23 200
16:07 $ 24.0091 1,532

Wieder nachbörslich ein 100k-Block.
Sammelt da jemand ein ?

running

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.851.212 von coolrunning am 05.10.07 09:45:35

Sieht ganz danach aus.

Ich vermute GS sammelt weiter!!??

[pagitz01]

wurme????

[dwurmitzer]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.855.777 von pagitz01 am 05.10.07 14:57:59

he peter!!!

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.855.990 von dwurmitzer am 05.10.07 15:11:11

keine namen hier neuling!!!!

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.856.028 von pagitz01 am 05.10.07 15:12:54

Hey Peter Pagitz,

lass den Neuling mit einfachen Aktien anfangen (Telekom, BMW) - hier ist das zu spekulativ !

Reiß ihn nicht rein....

running

[coolrunning]

So mal wieder etwas Sachliches, damit das hier nicht zum laber-thread wird:

October 5, 2007
Graham Amendment Authorizes Additional $23.6 Billion for MRAP Vehicles Filed under: Uncategorized — schotline @ 6:27 am

WASHINGTON– The U.S. Senate has approved an amendment sponsored by U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham which boosts funding for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles by $23.6 billion. The provision, which was included in the Fiscal Year 2008 Defense Authorization Bill, would allow the Army to replace all of its up-armored humvees in Iraq with MRAPs.

“Our enemy is a thinking enemy, and we have to adjust to respond to threats,” said Graham. “MRAPs offer the best protection from IEDs and we have a responsibility to provide the men and women in uniform with the best possible equipment available.”

Graham introduced the amendment along with Senator Joe Biden (D-DE).

Graham has been a leader in the Congressional effort to fund MRAPs over the years. In the Fiscal Year 2005 Defense Appropriations bill, Graham secured $4.5 million for Force Protection, Inc. (then known as Technical Solutions) based in Ladson, SC. Force Protection was a pioneer in MRAP technology and until recently was the only manufacturer with MRAPs deployed in Iraq. To date, Force Protection has contracts to produce 2,200 MRAPs.

“The funding secured in 2005 was a turning point in terms of bringing awareness to IED protection in Congress,” said Graham. “Without direct Congressional involvement, we would be years behind in developing and deploying MRAPs. It enabled the industry to prove the capability of their product. Now we have multiple companies competing for contracts and commitments from the Department of Defense to purchase thousands of these life-saving vehicles. This amendment helps take our commitment to the troops to the next level.”

Graham noted there are three MRAP manufacturers with facilities in South Carolina: Force Protection, Protected Vehicles, Inc. of Charleston, and BAE of Aiken. In addition, the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) in Charleston is responsible for outfitting all MRAPs with communications, navigation, and radio jamming equipment. SPAWAR is also responsible for delivering the vehicles by sea or air into theater.

“I am proud South Carolina has been a part of this effort from the beginning,” said Graham. “Once again our state has demonstrated we are the tip of spear in the fight against terrorism.”


running

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.856.171 von coolrunning am 05.10.07 15:19:16

thja is mein cousin!!!!!

er hat ein grosse vermögen und möchte ein kleines draus machen,ich helfe ihm nur

[coolrunning]

Falls es jemand wissen will:

October 05, 2007 09:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Oshkosh Truck to Announce Fourth Quarter Earnings on November 1, 2007
OSHKOSH, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oshkosh Truck Corporation (NYSE: OSK), a leading manufacturer of specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies, will issue its fourth quarter fiscal year 2007 financial results on November 1, 2007.

The results will be discussed on a webcast beginning at 9:00 a.m. EST. To access the webcast, investors should go to www.oshkoshtruckcorporation.com at least 15 minutes prior to the event.

Oshkosh Truck Corporation is a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad range of specialty access equipment, commercial, fire and emergency and military vehicles and vehicle bodies. Oshkosh's products are valued worldwide by rental companies, fire and emergency units, defense forces, municipal and airport support services, and concrete placement and refuse businesses where high quality, superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are paramount. For more information, log on to www.oshkoshtruckcorporation.com.

[______]

Force Protection's Statement on PVI's Response to Lawsuit
Friday October 5, 10:37 am ET

LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Force Protection Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT - News) announced today that its lawsuit against Protected Vehicles, Inc. for computer fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, and copyright infringement was answered by a lengthy list of "meaningless counterclaims that misrepresent the facts and distract from the serious particulars of the case," according to John Wall, attorney for Force Protection.

"Force Protection's suit against Protected Vehicles is simple and unambiguous," said Wall. "It is about former principals of Force Protection who took property -- both physical and intellectual -- from the company when they resigned to allegedly form a competitive enterprise, and then used that property in violation of copyright laws and other fair business practices."

Attorneys for Force Protection dismiss the answers and counterclaims made by Protected Vehicles as an "attempt to obfuscate the facts and threaten" the leading manufacturer of blast-protected vehicles for U.S. armed forces.

"Principals of Protected Vehicles have already admitted on record to taking property belonging to Force Protection, including computer hard drives with intellectual property," said Wall. "This was property purchased and developed by Force Protection. This case is no more complex than that, and the counterclaims made by Protected Vehicles are nothing more than stale accusations that have already been addressed thoroughly and satisfactorily by Force Protection and outside agencies."

About Force Protection Inc.

Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company generally uses words such as "believe," "may," "could," "will," "intend," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in the Company's Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although management believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made, and the Company's future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements may not meet these expectations. The Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this document to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in expectations, except as required by law.


Contact:

Policy Impact Communications
Jeff Child, 202-737-5339

Source: Force Protection Industries, Inc.

[______]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=112908&pt=…

In case you missed it - $43.1 MILLION dollar ILAV vehicle and parts order...

thanks again, riceman
ILAV and supply orders - royalties to fpi

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/confls/awd/W56HZV06DVB0100…

[coolrunning]

Was hier wieder abgeht....

So viele 100er-order kann ich gar nicht mehr zählen...

... und die dicken Dinger kommen wieder außerbörslich

Warten wir eben weiter auf news...

running

[coolrunning]

Force Protection Dismisses Protected Vehicles Response To Patent Infringement Suit As Meaningless - Quick Facts

(RTTNews) - Attorneys of Force Protection Industries Inc. (FRPT), dismissed the answers and counterclaims filed by Protected Vehicles in response to the lawsuit filed against it for computer fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, and copyright infringement as meaningless counterclaims to distract the suit from the serious particulars of the case.

According to John Wall, attorney for Force Protection, the case revolves around the former principals of Force Protection who took property - both physical and intellectual - from the company when they resigned to allegedly form a competitive enterprise, and then used that property in violation of copyright laws and other fair business practices.

For comments and feedback: contact [e-mail]

running

[coolrunning]

FRPT IBD CNBC NASDAQ INSTITUTIONAL HOLDINGS

Reported Institutional Ownership this week by Nasdaq and CNBC.
Answer to questions about Institutional Reporting is below.


IBD 9-7 9-14 9-21 9-28 10-5
SMART SELECT RATING 66 64 64 86 92
EARNINGS PER SHARE RATING 75 75 75 75 75
RELATIVE PRICE STRENGTH 83 77 73 93 94
INDUSTRY GRP PRICE STRNGTH B+ A- A- A- A-
SALES+PROFIT+MARGIN+ROE C C C C C
ACCUMULATION D D- D C+ B


PRICE 16.07 16.26 17.72 21.66 24.10


INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP % 75.1 75.2 75.1 75.1 75.2
MUTUAL FUND OWNERSHIP % 20.6 21.2 21.2 22.1 22.2
TOTALS % 95.7 96.4 96.3 97.2 97.4
USING CNBC.COM for ownership
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15837275?q=frpt

NASDAQ
INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP % 64.9 64.9 64.7 64.7 64.6


Company Details
Total Shares Out Standing (millions): 68

Market Capitalization ($ millions): $1,644

Institutional Ownership: 64.6%

Price (as of 10/5/2007) 24.1


Ownership Analysis # Of Holders Shares
Total Shares Held: 156 44,083,168

New Positions: 55 12,316,697

Increased Positions: 88 21,675,076

Decreased Positions: 61 11,168,725

Holders With Activity: 149 32,843,801

Sold Out Positions: 20 4,530,637


Answer to Question on Institutional Ownership reporting
I have been asked why the Ownership numbers do not make sense and seem to be unreliable. This is the best explanation I have seen so far. Credit goes to spixleatedlifeform.
The value of the holdings of each are determined by the pps at the close of the last day of the quarter in which that particular institution filed their holdings on SEC Form 13-F. They do not all file on the same date, but they are all required to file within 45 days of the end of each quarter. The holdings listed by CNBC are an admixture of several quarters' worth of filings and will not be entirely up to date until after the 14th of this month. Thus you have the appearance of inconsistency.
We'll have to wait until after the 14th.
There is one other possibility.
There is an escape clause in the Form 13-F which allows, upon request of the institution in question, for the 'hiding' of the holdings of a particular stock/equity if it would reveal an unresolved or active arbitrage.
That would include a situation whereby an institution own shares in a company but is also involved in shorting it.
There are other arbitrage possibilities due to options being traded.

running

[coolrunning]

Für neue Investoren: aus IV

Historie und Einblick bis heute in Kurzform:

Force Protection Inc. (FPI) began operations as company called Sonic Jet Performance which built recreational and commercial boats. In July 2002, they purchased Technical Solutions Group (TSG). TSG was developing Mine Protected Vehicles (MPV)s. Sonic Jet Performance changed its name to Force Protection Inc, and concentrated on building MPVs.

In 2002, TSG had sold 8 Tempest vehicles to the British military and 2 Buffalo to the US Military. The Tempest was an early version of the Cougar. The Cougar comes either as a 4X4 or 6X6 vehicle and is primarily used for patrolling in mine infested areas and to transport people or equipment. The Buffalo is a mine clearing vehicle that is normally equipped with a “spork” or retractable arm equipped with a large rake or scoop used to pick or move suspected IEDs. The retractable arm has a camera so that suspicious items can be clearly viewed from inside the vehicle.

During testing by the British military in 2002, the Tempest vehicle outperformed seven competing vehicles from different manufacturers. Similarly, the Buffalo was exhaustively tested by the US military against competing vehicles such as the South African designed Casspir and “soundly” outperformed it.

By the end of 2004, FPI had delivered a total of 29 vehicles (not including the 10 vehicles sold by TSG). In 2005, FPI delivered 71 vehicles to the military. Demand for vehicles was increasing and it was clear that FPI needed to develop new manufacturing processes to keep up with demand. Therefore, they made a decision to build the first production line for Cougars. Prior to this, they had been building vehicles on a one by one basis. For a small company, that was getting intermittent orders from the military, this was a large commitment. It would cost a large amount of money and temporarily reduce the number of vehicles that they could build. In early 2006, FPI completed staffing the new production line and by April 2006 they had reached target production of 20 Cougars per month.

In July, 2006 FPI began the process of tripling internal production. The demand for MPVs was increasing and the military was working on a large new “solicitation” for MPV vehicles. Under the new solicitation, MPVs were called Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles. FPI’s production ramp up was intended to increase production from approximately 20 Cougars and 3 Buffalo per month to approximately 50 to 60 Cougars and as many as 8 to 10 Buffalos per month. By December 2006, FPI was producing more than 50 vehicles per month.

In November 2006, the military officially solicited bids for the MRAP program. Under MRAP, the military initially planned to purchase 4100.This number continues to increase and is now in excess of 25,000 vehicles.

The major reason for the increase in numbers of vehicles requested is that MRAP vehicles and especially FPI’s vehicles have proven to be very safe. The US Military and government have realized that the best way to save lives in Iraq and Afghanistan is to provide the soldiers with Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles and the soldiers and commanders in Iraq have requested them.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates comments underscore how serious the administration is about getting MRAP vehicles to Iraq and Afghanistan when he officially designated the MRAP program the Pentagon's 'Highest Priority' Acquisition Program and he called for military leaders to use, “… any and all options to accelerate the production and fielding of this capability.”

As the numbers of MRAP vehicles needed continued to increase, FPI needed to ramp-up production even more quickly. Therefore FPI entered into agreements with other manufacturers such as Armored Holdings and General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS). The initial manufacturing agreement with GDLS was changed to a joint venture which is called “Force Dynamics (FD)”. Other companies that have helped to build MRAP Cougar vehicles included FPI, GDLS, Armored Holdings, Spartan Chassis, Ultra Machines & Fabrication. Force Protection built Cougars for the Iraqi army in a partnership with BAE.

Under the MRAP program, the Buffalo vehicle is a “CAT III” vehicle and FPI was named as a sole source for CAT III vehicles. The Joint Venture with GD and manufacturing agreements were mainly intended to build the Cougar family of vehicles for the MRAP program.

FPI has developed a third vehicle type called the Cheetah. The Cheetah is smaller and lighter than the Cougar or Buffalo but still has a large degree of mine and Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) protection built into it. The Cheetah is designed to be a light tactical vehicle that can be used in the place of Humvees where mines and IEDs are a danger. Given its performance and safety, the Cheetah is the most likely interim replacement for the Humvee. Force Protection is currently building a manufacturing facility for the Cheetah and expects to start production at the end of October. Volume production of the Cheetah is expected to begin in 2008.

Last month, the joint venture of Force Protection and General Dynamics (Force Dynamics) produced 116 vehicles. At the end of September, Force Protection completed additional production lines at the Ladson facility. The additional lines will allow them to rapidly increase production and by the end of the year Force Dynamics is expected to produce 355 per month.

FPI’s vehicles are easy to repair, economical and practical because they rely on commercially available parts and sub-assemblies whenever possible. The Buffalo chassis is the same one as used in many Mack trucks. Cougar vehicles currently use a Chassis provided by Spartan Chassis Inc. The drive train, transmissions and motors are provided by manufacturers such as Caterpillar, Mack, Allison, Fabco and Marmon-Herrington.

High reliability is ensured by using proven highly reliable parts and sub-assemblies. It ensures the vehicles are economical because FPI is purchasing products already produced in volume. In short, FPI is able to build a highly reliable vehicle by using the best technology from many different vendors and integrating them together. Part of FPI’s genius has been their ability to rapidly adapt, design, prototype and manufacture the best in class vehicle faster than their large competitors.

FPI’s vehicles were designed to not only to protect the drivers and passengers from IED and mine blasts but to be easily repaired after they are hit. This means that most Cougar and Buffalo can be quickly repaired so that they can be returned to the job of providing the best available protection even after large IED or mine blasts.

FPI initially acquired much of the “mine and blast protection” design used in the Buffalo and Cougar from South Africa in various license and technology agreements. South African companies had the best anti-mine and IED technology available. South Africa had developed their technology after fighting an insurgency that lasted over 30 years. During the insurgency, the weapons of choice were mines and IEDs. South Africa had limited resources and was forced to develop technology that was both sophisticated and inexpensive. South Africa was successful and was able to deploy enough of the new vehicles to render the insurgent’s main weapon -- mines and IEDs ineffective. FPI was granted the exclusive design and manufacturing rights to some of South Africa’s latest technology in return for a per vehicle royalty.

FPI’s chief scientist is Dr. Vernon Joynt who is a pioneer in the field of ballistic and mine protected vehicle design. Dr. Joynt worked on many of the South African designs and developed many of the most successful designs. One of his early accomplishments was the design of the first “wedge shaped” mine protected vehicle for the South African government. The Wedge shaped design is sometime also called the V shaped hull design and is now used on most Mine Protected Vehicles around the world.

FPI recognized and obtained exclusive licenses to some of the best technology available before anyone else. Since then, they have been developing new technology to improve the protection of armored vehicles. The Cheetah is one example and it uses new technology developed exclusively by FPI. Although the Cheetah is much smaller and lighter than larger MRAP vehicles, it provides a large amount of blast protection.

Force Protection has in just a few months, grown from a small niche vehicle manufacturer to a mainstream military vehicle manufacturer. They have the “Gold Standard” MRAP vehicle currently in Iraq, their new vehicle the Cheetah is the smallest and least expensive MRAP vehicle and has been submitted to the second round of MRAP testing – MRAP II.

At the end of June 2007, Force Dynamics had a vehicle backlog of 1558 Cougars. In mid February 2008, they are expected to complete the vehicle backlog. FPI needs to begin the process of ordering parts for the vehicles six months in advance. Therefore, it is expected in the next two weeks that additional vehicle orders will occur.

Force Protection does not yet have any orders for the Cheetah. However, it is expected that in the few weeks as their new Cheetah production facility is completed that they will begin to get orders for Cheetahs. Currently in Iraq and Afghanistan, new MRAP vehicles are too large to operate along some very narrow streets or in some off-road terrain. The Cheetah has similar off-road ability to the Humvee and is small enough to operate on narrow streets. The Cheetah has better fuel economy than an up armored Humvee, has the payload capacity and is built to handle large amounts of additional armor if needed. In short, the Cheetah is the only MRAP vehicle small enough and agile enough to be a real replacement for the Humvee but that is as survivable as larger MRAP vehicles.

FPI (Force Protection, Inc) has the stock ticker FRPT and is traded on the NASDAQ

Force Protection’ video overview
http://www.forceprotection.net/news/video.html?video=fpr_ove…

Mrzippy Provides Cliff notes – Aberdeen, York, PA and Modern Day Marine
http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=112304&pt…

Elococo from Bloomberg provides an update
http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=112204&pt…

PKinOC Provides Ramp-up and delivery information
http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=112563&pt…

FSAL Provides some FPI facts and recent links
http://www1.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=112430&pt…


running

[coolrunning]

short squeeze:

FRPT $ 24.10
Force Protection Inc. 0.03
Shares Short 15,302,000
Days to Cover (Short Ratio) 16.3
Short % of Float 26.65 %
Shares Short - Prior 16,480,500
Short % Increase / Decrease -7.15 %
Squeeze RankingTM 818
% from 52-Wk HIGH ( 31.16 ) -29.29 %
% from 52-Wk LOW ( 6.35 ) 73.65 %
% from 200-Day MA ( 20.55 ) 14.73 %
% from 50-Day MA ( 20.81 )
13.65 %
Price % Change (52-Wk) 188.30 %
Trading Volume - Today 1,308,404
Trading Volume - Average 939,600
Trading Volume Vs. Avg. 139.25 %
Total Shares - Float 57,420,000
Total Shares - Outstanding 68,207,649
% Held by Insiders 4.29 %
% Held by Institutions 66.40 %
Market Cap 1,643,797,520
EPS 0.55
PE Ratio 43.80
Sector: Consumer Goods
Industry: Trucks & Other Vehicles
SI Record Date 2007-Sept


Information Provided Without Warranty


running

[mc-plop]

More Armor for U.K. Troops
MoD Seeks to Expand Cougar Fleet; Needs Pentagon To OK Vehicle Diversion
By ANDREW CHUTER Posted 10/08/07


LONDON — Britain will more than double its protected patrol vehicle fleet by adding 148 Force Protection Cougar vehicles, whose purchase is now being negotiated with the U.S. government.

Under what is essentially a mirror image of the U.S. Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) requirement, the British military has already acquired 108 modified Cougars — which they call the Mastiff —for use in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Now the British want more to fill an ur¬gent operational requirement to better protect troops fighting the Taliban in south¬ern Afghanistan, industry sources said.
The British Treasury is clamping down on spending on urgent requirements, but it ap¬pears the upcoming Cougar deal has been approved.
But the British requirement for rapid de¬livery could pose a different kind of problem.
If the British are to get their order quick¬ly, the Pentagon will need to allow Force Protection to divert vehicles from produc¬tion lines that are already red-hot from building vehicles for the U.S. military. The company has an MRAP deal to deliver more than 1,900 Cougar and Buffalo vehicles.
The Pentagon allowed such a diversion for the first British order, and the British hope it will again allow something similar despite the high U.S. priority on MRAP production.
So far there is no firm order signed for the additional six-wheel-drive Cougars, al¬though a deal may be imminent, industry sources say.
The contract is a government-to-govern¬ment agreement signed as part of the U.S. Foreign Military Sales process.
A British Ministry of Defence (MoD) spokesman declined to confirm interest in buying more Cougars.
A Force Protection spokesman said the company had no official information re¬garding further British interest in Cougar.
The first vehicles were ordered in July 2006, deliveries got under way in late December, and the last of the 108 arrived in Britain for modification in June. As of early September, more than 80 of the vehicles were in service.
The Mastiff is an uparmored version of the Cougar fitted with the Army’s new Bowman tactical communications system and elec¬tronic countermeasures. The modifications were undertaken here.
Most of the early deliveries ended up in Iraq, but as the British draw down their ef¬fort in the Basra region of the country, the requirement has swung toward Afghanistan, where improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have caused several deaths.

One industry source here said Force Pro¬tection may also be providing Cheetah light tactical four-wheel-drive vehicles for a British special forces requirement.

The vehicle was displayed at the recent Defence Systems & Equipment Internation¬al (DSEi) show in London. Ostensibly, that was part of the company’s effort to secure an order from the British for the Medium Protected Patrol Vehicle (MPPV) require¬ment. But it now appears Force Protection may have had a second requirement in mind when it exhibited Cheetah.
The British in April kick-started the MPPV requirement to purchase 180 mini-MRAP type vehicles of about 14 tons to sit between the Mastiff and the much lighter Pinzgauer Vector patrol vehicle.
Interest in MPPV High, but Some Confusion
The requirement attracted a huge amount of interest, with BAE Systems, Force Pro¬tection, JCB, Krauss Maffei-Wegmann, Mac¬Neilie, NP Aerospace, Rafael and Thales among the possible contenders.

One media report here this week said the MoD had decided to drop the MPPV contest in favor of buying 250 Cheetahs.

That’s been denied by the MoD spokesman here.
A narrowing of possible contenders had been expected at about the time of DSEi. That short list hasn’t arrived yet.
Until further clarity is available on the MPPV requirement, there will remain suspi¬cions about the future of a project that still requires funding at a time when the British armed forces are facing serious cuts.
Whether the growing Mastiff fleet, which will number about 250 if the new deal goes ahead, will affect MPPV requirements is unclear.
One defense contractor involved in the MPPV competition said there appeared to be “ongoing discussion at the MoD whether a larger, more protected vehicle was needed or whether they should go for something lighter and more agile. The debate is ongoing, leav¬ing MPPV in a bit of disarray for the moment.”
Others are more confident that MPPV is not on the ropes.
“We think they have a plan. They are test¬ing and evaluating what is in the gap be¬tween Mastiff and the Snatch Land Rover and may then decide whether to fund it,” an¬other contractor source said.
Either way, if the British want the first vehicles in service by their stated date of 2009, somebody will have to decide soon on funding. å
E-mail: [e-mail].

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=3087173&C=europe




Na das klingt ja mal sehr anständig!

Da werden wir die 25 $ Marke heute wohl erstmal dick hinter uns lassen.

[bregenzer]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 28.928.037 von pagitz01 am 20.04.07 23:10:09

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=3087173&C=europe

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.896.574 von mc-plop am 08.10.07 11:17:54

ist heute nicht Feiertag drüben???

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.897.516 von illi1 am 08.10.07 12:40:15

Börsen sind heute aber offen laut Yahoo.

Monday, October 8, 2007, 6:45AM ET - U.S. Markets open in 2 hours and 45 minutes

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.897.563 von mc-plop am 08.10.07 12:45:52

jup scheinbar nur Kanada zu ...!

[Demolitionman]

Press Release Source: Force Protection, Inc.

Force Protection, Inc. Awarded Additional ILAV Vehicle Contract
Monday October 8, 8:30 am ET

LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Leading armored vehicle manufacturer Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT - News) today announced that it has received a purchase order from BAE Systems for an additional 45 Iraq Light Armored Vehicles (ILAV). In addition to Iraq, approximately 18 of these vehicles are bound for Yemen. The order is worth an estimated $3.5 million and will be completed by February 2008.

ADVERTISEMENT
The combined enterprise of Force Protection and BAE Systems previously received awards totaling $180 million in 2006 to build 398 4x4 ILAVs, based on the proven design of the Cougar vehicle. In total, the contract authorizes production of up to 1,050 Cougar ILAVs. BAE Systems is prime contractor on the ILAV program, with Force Protection as subcontractor.

"We are pleased to continue to provide our life-saving blast protection technology in support of U.S. armed forces and their coalition partners," said Force Protection COO Raymond Pollard. "This new contract is further evidence of the many applications of our proven Cougar solution for American forces and their allies in the global war on terror."

Force Protection's Cougar and Buffalo vehicles have an unmatched record of performance in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are the gold standard in troop safety and have protected thousands of troops during highly dangerous route clearance and explosive ordnance disposal operations since 2003.

About Force Protection, Inc.

Force Protection, Inc., first to answer the call to duty for the urgent need to bring lifesaving mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles to U.S. troops in combat and an American company whose vehicles, Cougar and Buffalo, have a proven track record where it matters most; in the battlefield, manufactures ballistic- and mine-protected vehicles through its wholly-owned subsidiary. These specialty vehicles protect against landmines, hostile fire, and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs, commonly referred to as roadside bombs). Force Protection's mine and ballistic protection technologies are among the most advanced in the world. The vehicles are manufactured outside Charleston, S.C. For more information on Force Protection and its vehicles, visit www.forceprotection.net.

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.898.827 von Demolitionman am 08.10.07 14:40:20

Ich kann mir eigentlich nicht vorstellen, dass FRPT für 77.777 $ ein Fahrzeug baut und liefert ????

Weiß jemand mehr über Ausführung und Typ ?

running

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.899.148 von coolrunning am 08.10.07 15:07:35

Ich nehme mal an es ist schlicht weg ein Druckfehler in der nachricht.

Entweder handelt es sich nicht um die kompletten Fahrzeuge sondern nur um zusätzliches Equipment oder Ersatzteile oder die Zahl 3,5 mio $ ist schlicht falsch.

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.899.292 von mc-plop am 08.10.07 15:18:48

The combined enterprise of Force Protection and BAE Systems previously received awards totaling $180 million in 2006 to build 398 4x4 ILAVs, based on the proven design of the Cougar vehicle. In total, the contract authorizes production of up to 1,050 Cougar ILAVs. BAE Systems is prime contractor on the ILAV program, with Force Protection as subcontractor.


Also: 180.000.000 / 398 = 452.261 $/4x4 ILAV

Bleibt die Frage 3,5 mill.$ wofür???

[coolrunning]

BAE Systems to Provide Bar-Armor Kits for 215 U.S. Army Route Clearance Vehicles

ALEXANDRIA, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--BAE Systems will provide lightweight bar-armor kits for 215 U.S. Army Route Clearance Vehicles under a contract with a not-to-exceed value of $14.5 million.

Under the contract from the Army’s Tank-automotive Armaments Command, BAE Systems will equip RG31 and Cougar vehicles with its L-ROD™ aluminum armor, used widely on Army Buffalo ordnance disposal vehicles.

“We developed the L-ROD system as a low-cost and lightweight solution to protect vehicles against rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs),” said Dr. Jim Galambos, director of business development for BAE Systems’ Advanced Technologies organization. “Our selection for the RG31 and Cougar demonstrates the easy adaptability of this system to just about any type of vehicle.”

L-ROD is a modular system made of lightweight aluminum alloy that protects vehicles without adding significant additional weight or compromising their operational capabilities. The system weighs less than half of comparable steel designs and is bolted to the vehicle, avoiding the need for welding or cutting. It also can be repaired easily in the field.

BAE Systems originally developed the system as part of a fast-response Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency program to provide RPG protection for High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles. Army officials conducted more than 50 live-fire tests to validate the performance and optimize the engineering design.

L-ROD is standard equipment on the Army Buffalo explosive ordnance disposal vehicle. BAE Systems has delivered more than 100 L-ROD kits to the Army, with additional kits slated for the Marine Corps’ Buffalo vehicles. The company also is completing L-ROD designs for BAE Systems’ Caiman II and RG33-series mine-protected vehicles.

running

[coolrunning]

Kann das jemand verstehen ? Wer verkauft hier ?

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.901.193 von coolrunning am 08.10.07 17:41:38

mensch mach dir keine sorgen bei so vielen offenen gaps war das doch klar!!!

wird schon wieder am ende der woche stehen wir höher als wir heute geöffnet haben!!!

[pagitz01]

also bei 18,50 usd hätten wir ja noch ein gap!!!


ich sagte ja !!

die gaps weren geschlossen war schon so gut wie immer so!!!

[DollarPenny]

Nachkaufkurse! Jetzt nochmal billig nachlegen.

Das geht heute wieder Richtung 25$!

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.905.914 von DollarPenny am 09.10.07 09:14:38

monster-gap bei schliessung kaufen das es kracht!!!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.912.006 von pagitz01 am 09.10.07 15:52:19

...sag mal wenn ich das richtig in Erinnerung habe wollte Brasi
dich mal besuchen. War er schon bei dir.

Habe gerade auf IV ein Posting von ihm gelesen.
Dort schreibt er: My target is 45

Schade eigentlich, daß er hier nicht mehr postet. Seine Postings
fehlen hier.

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.912.330 von charlie01 am 09.10.07 16:05:21

alles andre no comment°!!!!

das er hier nicht postet finde ich auch schade!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.912.456 von pagitz01 am 09.10.07 16:11:28

Bei 45 verkaufe ich auch. Bleibt nur die Frage $ oder €.

Danach brauche ich noch so einen Kracher
oder bei PTSC tut sich mal endlich was.

[tenere660]

Schön wie es heute den Feiertag mit dem Absacker
wieder nach oben geführt hat

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.917.626 von tenere660 am 09.10.07 21:13:10

cuple+handle-formation

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.912.456 von pagitz01 am 09.10.07 16:11:28

Bist Du immernoch der Meinung mit dem monster-gap? Wann sollte es denn soweit sein? M m sieht es doch wieder nach 25$ aus?

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.921.127 von DollarPenny am 10.10.07 09:54:26

runnung gup????


oder nicht!°!!!!

keine ahnung aber es sind 2 offene gaps irgendwann wirds geschlossen !!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.922.962 von pagitz01 am 10.10.07 12:02:27

...wenn nicht dieses Jahr, dann eben nächstes oder übernächstes!

Wenn ich mir den Jahreschart anschaue sind da aber noch einige
gaps die geschlossen werden müssen, oder?

P.S.: Melissa ist auch wieder fleißig.

[carpediem2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.923.172 von charlie01 am 10.10.07 12:16:58

Tja wirkt aber leider schon.
Melissa wird sich vieleicht nach der Gesetzesänderung am 15.10. bzgl. Schorts covern ändern.....vieleicht

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.925.055 von carpediem2 am 10.10.07 14:33:27

Dieser Artikel wird folgen haben für Melissa & Cramer

[carpediem2]

Dabei sieht die doch auf dem Foto gar nicht so bösartig aus

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.925.183 von charlie01 am 10.10.07 14:42:56

kannst du mal den Artikel reinstellen,thx

[carpediem2]

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/general/1038361…

Hat aber nicht wirklich was verändert Realtime in Stuttgart wieder 17,20

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.925.599 von pes05 am 10.10.07 15:13:43

hier der Link:

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=113813&pt=…

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.925.779 von carpediem2 am 10.10.07 15:25:03

Bitte nicht den Link über thestreet.com benutzen!!!

[carpediem2]

So wie`s aussieht nehmen die Melissa eh nicht mehr ernst

[Highnoon120]

Hat sie nicht vor wenigen wochen noch lobend von unserem schatz geschrieben?

[illi1]

24 Dollar auf Sk Basis wären schon o.k.
wäre die basis des letzten ausbruchs!!

[illi1]

oder besser Wiederstandes!!

[Barde69]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.931.930 von illi1 am 10.10.07 21:35:28

Pentagon planning to have only 3 types of MRAPs
Army Plans to Reduce Number of MRAP Variants, Consider Even Larger Fleet (3 Ratings) 44 minutes ago Army Plans to Reduce Number of MRAP Variants, Consider Even Larger Fleet

wenn das keine fette news ist, dann weiß ich nix mehr! die fahrzeugtypen sollen reduziert werden. es werden die bevorzugt, die beweisen können, dass sie die anforderungen erfüllen. einfach ausgedrückt - die besten machen das rennen. weniger hersteller bedeutet größerer anteil. wir werden weiterhin das verkaufen, was wir zu produzieren in der lage sind!
Oct.10, 2007 -- Army leaders plan to narrow the number of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle variants the service acquires in order to reduce the burden of maintaining and repairing a diverse blast-proof truck fleet, a move that will set up a high-stakes competition for future production awards among armored truck builders.

In addition, early next year Pentagon leaders plan to review the program and consider increasing the requirement beyond the military’s current acquisition objective of 15,374, according to senior Army officials.

Lt. Gen. Ross Thompson, the military deputy to the Army’s acquisition executive and a key player in determining the mix of the 10,000 MRAPs the service plans to buy, said the Army desires an inventory that is more homogenous than the collection of vehicles acquired in the first wave of production by five different vendors this summer.

“I would like to see us have fewer MRAP variants because of the sustainability issue,” Thompson told InsideDefense.com, adding, “No decision is teed up for us to do that right now.”

This week, Army units in Iraq are taking receipt of their first MRAP deliveries under the high-priority effort to build more than 15,000 of the armored trucks through next year. Thompson said those units’ operational experience with the first of the more than 4,100 MRAPs the Army plans to field in the next few months will influence future procurement decisions.

“That’s probably a general direction that you’ll see us go,” Thomason said. “Once we get the five different variants out there right now tested out through operational experience, we’ll probably buy fewer total variants in more quantities. I don’t know what that number is right now, but it will be less than five.”

Lt. Gen. Stephen Speakes, the Army’s deputy chief of staff for programs, told reporters yesterday that Pentagon leaders plan to review the status of the MRAP program early next year and consider whether to increase the MRAP acquisition objective.

“What the administration has asked for right now is for the maximum industrial capacity -- as we understand it right now -- for American industry to procure this coming fiscal year,” Speakes said of the current acquisition target endorsed on Sept. 5 by Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and head of the Pentagon’s Joint Requirements Oversight Council.

“We have the opportunity to revisit the trajectory of this program somewhere this coming spring,” the three-star general said, to “make decisions about where we go in [fiscal year 2009], if there is a requirement, what it is, how we fund it and how to proceed.”

There is an interesting thread on the yahoo site. Here is the start of it. It looks good for FRPT!!!!!
In an effort to surge production of these life-saving vehicles -- which offer better protection than humvees against roadside bombs -- the Pentagon awarded manufacturing contracts to five different vendors, some of which are building MRAPs of more than one size.

[carpediem2]

Na, da ist ja ganz schön Nachfrage!!! Plus 55% im Xetra, sieht so aus, als ob von Drüben schon mal billig=17,89 eingekauft wird

[Florian1989]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.932.849 von Barde69 am 10.10.07 22:32:48

Hier ein Artikel aus "Der Aktionär" Ausgabe N°42:

Minen keine Chance
Force Protection - Kurschance 75%

In der Rüstungsindustrie gibt es derzeit ein Kürzel, das für Aufmerksamkeit sorgt: MRAP. Unter MRAPs - Mine Resistant Ambush Protected - versteht man Militärfahrzeuge, die gegen den Angriff von Minen und Handfeuerwaffen gewappnet sind. MRAPs sind ein Milliardenmarkt, von der jüngsten Etataufstockung des Pentagons um 42 Milliarden Dollar sollen allein rund elf Milliarden auf MRAP entfallen.
Ein Produzent von MRAPs ist Force Protection aus South Carolina. Ein Analyst von Friedman Billings Ramsey stufte die Aktie des Konzerns jüngst auf "outperform" hoch. Begründung: Bei Force Protection dürften einige Regierungen in Zukunft viele Bestellungen aufgeben. So sollen etwa die Briten in den kommenden Monaten mehr als 80 Fahrzeuge bei Force Protection bestellen - zuzüglich zu den 110 Orders, die dort bereits aus London eingegangen sind.

Riesenmarkt
Angesichts der Aussichten des MRAP-Marktes ist Force Protection ein Investment wert.
Ziel: 29,70€
Stopp: 12,70€
Ums. 08e 1,33 Mrd. US-$

[carpediem2]

In Deutschland ist die Aktie weitgehend unbekannt.....und hier wird nur ein Mini-Bruchteil des Umsatzes erziehlt.
Kann mir gut vorstellen, daß heute der Wiederstand bei 24$ durchbrochen wird.....

[coolrunning]

Hier mal für Neulinge einige gesammelte Informationen über Force Protection:


http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=114061&pt=…

Hier steckt noch genügend Potential drin, also nicht lange warten.


Dies ist jedoch keine Kaufempfehlung. Macht euch euer eigenes Bild.

running

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.940.046 von coolrunning am 11.10.07 15:28:44

Dein Posting scheint gewirkt zu haben!!

Fast 5000 Shares heute in D bis jetzt gehandelt

Ich glaube es dauert nicht mehr lange, bis der Letzte gemerkt hat, was für ein Perle hier heranwächst!!!



sampler

[coolrunning]

Force Protection "buy," target price raised

Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:08:36 PM ET
Dougherty & Company

NEW YORK, October 11 (newratings.com) - Analysts at Dougherty & Company reiterate their "buy" rating on Force Protection Inc (ticker: FRPT). The target price has been raised from $25 to $30.


running

[mc-plop]

Wir lümmeln jetzt schon den neunten Tag in Folge um die 24 $ rum, wird mal langsam Zeit für einen Ausbruch Richtung 30 $.

Die 24 $ - Marke dürfte dann als eine starke Charttechnische Unterstützung dienen.

Bin mal gespannt wann der neue MRAP-Contract eintrudelt und hoffe mal das er dann auch einen nicht enttäuschenden Umfang hat.
So einen 200 - 500 Stück Auftrag wäre wohl eher einen Enttäuschung und nicht gerade förderlich für den Kurs.

Könnte mir sogar fast vorstellen das die Erwartungen nun schon wieder so hoch sind das es bei einem Auftrag unter 1000 Stück wieder einmal zum "Sell on good news" kommen könnte.

Naja mal sehen bin aber auf jeden fall zuversichtlich das bis Jahresende 35 $ pps drin sind.

[Mr.Perfect]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.961.219 von mc-plop am 12.10.07 19:11:07

die basis ist jedenfalls mal gut.

ich sehe es auch so, dass wir bis ende jahr bei rund 35$ stehen werden.
was fehlt sind endlich wieder mal dicke verträge im bereich zwischen 300 - 700mio.$

mal schauen wie sich das ganze entwickelt.

ich bin jedenfalls mal die nächsten zwei wochen weg und hoffe sehr, dass wir zumindest noch über 24$ stehen werden.

persönlich denke ich, dass wir bis ende oktober bereits bei rund 28$ stehen werden

c-ya and good trades...
Mr.Perfect

[coolrunning]

Airmen to get first MRAPs early next year
Airmen to get first MRAPs early next year

By Erik Holmes - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Oct 13, 2007 7:05:23 EDT
The Air Force is not primarily a ground force, but you wouldn’t know it to look at the new wheels some airmen will be getting soon.

Airmen in Iraq and Afghanistan will receive 25 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles by early next year to replace the more vulnerable Humvees they currently drive.

And that’s just the first batch of a fleet of 697 MRAPs the Air Force says it needs during the next three years. The vehicles cost about $1 million each, a senior Air Force official said. The total value of the Air Force purchase was not available.

Humvees have proved vulnerable to improvised explosive devices — the biggest killer of troops in Iraq — so the Air Force is looking to protect its most exposed airmen with MRAPs.

MRAPs are considered the best protection for U.S. troops threatened by roadside bombs and mines planted by insurgents in Iraq and, increasingly, the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan. The vehicles have V-shaped hulls designed to deflect bomb blasts away from troops inside.

“The MRAP will afford protection superior to the up-armored Humvee for airmen performing high-risk missions in Iraq and Afghanistan,” the senior Air Force official said.

The Air Force will take delivery of the first 25 vehicles in December or January, the official said. They will then be outfitted with equipment such as radios and signal jammers — which typically takes about two weeks — and shipped to the war zones.

The senior official said the Air Force has not yet identified the specific airmen to receive the MRAPs, but they will be “outside the wire” airmen such as tactical air control parties, Special Forces, explosive ordnance disposal teams, Office of Special Investigations agents and combat control teams.

The Air Force’s MRAPs will be manufactured by Force Protection Inc., a South Carolina-based armored vehicle manufacturer. The company is under contract for or has produced more than 1,900 MRAPs for the Defense Department, according to its Web site.

The company also reported that it produced 115 of the vehicles in September, its highest monthly total to date.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made buying and fielding more MRAPs his top procurement priority.

The Pentagon has doubled the total number approved for purchase to 15,374, for $11.3 billion over the next three years. That is far more than the 7,774 approved by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council in May, but far short of the 20,000-plus vehicles that were being talked about a few months ago.

In addition to the Air Force’s 697, the purchase includes 10,000 for the Army, 3,700 for the Marine Corps, 544 for the Navy, 333 for Special Operations Command and 100 for testing, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said recently.

So far, the Pentagon has ordered 6,415 MRAPs and spent $5.6 billion on them.

At least 1,500 — and as many as 3,500 — MRAPs will be in Iraq by Dec. 31.

Staff writers Kris Osborn and William H. McMichael contributed to this report.


running

[coolrunning]

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=114541&pt=…

running

[DollarPenny]

geht es jetzt auf das 18,5$ GAP ?

[kyron7htx]

Was sind das denn wieder für Mistnachrichten.
Wie weit geht es runter!!!!

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.999.945 von kyron7htx am 15.10.07 15:28:13

könnt ihr mal die nachrichten reinstellen.Danke

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.043 von pes05 am 15.10.07 15:31:32

Finde ich aber nicht so schlimm.


Looks like there was a reason for the recent Financial jobs being posted.

Time for FPI to start bring in the pro's and hiring world-class white-collar staff.

Zippy

From the SEC filing


We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could adversely affect our ability to report our financial condition and results of operations accurately or on a timely basis. As a result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could harm our business and the trading price of our stock.

As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. We previously restated our financial statements in our annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2004 and 2005 and we amended our annual report on Form 10-K for the 2006 fiscal year. Following our restating and amending of our prior annual reports, we identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and have now concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, we did not maintain effective control over financial reporting. Specifically, the control deficiencies that contributed to our material weaknesses included our lack of a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience with our company and training in the application of GAAP commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. For a more detailed discussion of our internal control over financial reporting and a description of the identified material weaknesses, see “Item 9A: Controls and Procedures—Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” of our Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed on October 4, 2007.

Each of our material weaknesses results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements that we prepare will not be prevented or detected. As a result, we must perform extensive additional work to obtain reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial statements. Even with this additional work, there is a risk of additional errors not being prevented or detected, which could result in additional restatements. Moreover, other material weaknesses may be identified.

Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting could adversely impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information. If we are unsuccessful in implementing or following our remediation plan, or fail to update our internal control over financial reporting as our business evolves, we may be unable to report financial information timely and accurately or to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures. Any such failure in the future could also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor attestation reports regarding disclosure controls and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder. If we are unable to report financial information in a timely and accurate manner or to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, we could be subject to, among other things, regulatory or enforcement actions by the SEC and NASDAQ, including a delisting from the NASDAQ Stock Market, securities litigation, and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects and the valuation of our common stock.

We also have extensive work remaining to remedy the identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and this work will continue through the balance 2007 and perhaps beyond. There can be no assurance as to when all of the material weaknesses will be remedied. Until our remedial efforts are completed, management will continue to devote significant time and attention to these efforts, and we will continue to incur expenses associated with the additional procedures and resources required to prepare our financial statements. Certain of our remedial actions, such as hiring additional qualified personnel and implementing a new operating system, will be ongoing and will result in our incurring additional costs even after our material weaknesses are remedied.

[kyron7htx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.072 von mc-plop am 15.10.07 15:32:25

Jedenfalls so schlimm das wir heute 7,00% im Minus stehen

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.127 von kyron7htx am 15.10.07 15:34:06

dasrf ich dir den chart mal vor die augen halten!!! Danke!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.127 von kyron7htx am 15.10.07 15:34:06

Heute abend mindestens wieder über 23 $, was interressiert der Quark von vorgestern wenn die Zukunft so rosig aus sieht.

Hier mal noch ne meinung aus IV:

Posted as a reply to msg 114643 by mrzippy
Re: Restated Earnings

Zip, comming from a CPA, I do not expect there to be a revision of the numbers. This to me looks like an acknowledgement of a previous material weekness. you cannot have a restatement and not have a meterial weakness. Therefore, if you restate, you must have a material weakness. This should have been disclosed in the original restatements, but was not. This is on the Public Accountants. At this point, this is just a formaization of what we have known for a long time. FPI has alreading indicated that this weakness did not affect 06 and I see nothing to change this. My guess is that someone else (???) is looking at the sec filings criticaly to make sure everthing is tidy and in order!! Might be a good time to look into one of the Big 4

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.258 von mc-plop am 15.10.07 15:38:35

Wird wohl schon in 5 minuten wieder über 23 $ sein...

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.307 von mc-plop am 15.10.07 15:40:37

RT 23,20 $

[illi1]

man leute das geht es mal ein parr Prozent nach unten und schon ist alles wieder Mist und es wird rumgeheult!!

die Börse ist nun mal keine Einbahnstraße!!!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.368 von illi1 am 15.10.07 15:42:50

Immer nur die Ruhe bewahren.

Wir werden heute im grünen Bereich schliessen.

Diese Woche kommen noch "BIG NEWS".

[illi1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.450 von charlie01 am 15.10.07 15:45:45

ich bin die ruhe in person!!!

oder heule ich rum das es mal etwas fällt??

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.000.547 von illi1 am 15.10.07 15:49:07

Sorry, meinte nicht dich, sondern allgemein.

[kyron7htx]

AP
Force Protection Warns on Accounting
Monday October 15, 9:48 am ET
Force Protection Finds Material Weaknesses in Accounting Which Could Result in Restatements


LADSON, S.C. (AP) -- Armored vehicle maker Force Protection Inc. found material weaknesses in accounting system, according to a filing Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Shares fell 75 cents, or 3.1 percent, to $23.20 in morning trading. They have ranged from $6.35 to $31.16 over the past year.

ADVERTISEMENT


Force Protection previously restated annual reports for 2003 through 2005 and amended its annual report for 2006. During those restatements, the company found personnel were not properly skilled in certain accounting procedures.

The company said the problems affect all financial reports after Dec. 31, 2006.

Force Protection said the problems could affect its management evaluations and annual audit, and could lead to restatements, delisting from the Nasdaq Stock Market, potential legal issues, and a loss of investor confidence.

The company also said it could take charges through the rest of the year and beyond, related to the hiring of new personnel and other efforts to shore up its accounting.

[kyron7htx]

-8,70%:O

[kyron7htx]

-10,00%

[enna2]

Das ist ja wieder ein Fest für die Shortys.
Solche hausgemachten Probleme sind ja auch ein Witz !
Musten die nicht auch schon im letzten Jahr ein oder zwei Millionen an Strafe zahlen wegen falscher Buchhaltung ???
Hab da noch sowas im Hinterkopf.....

[coolrunning]

Ich krieg die Krise.....

Mann, mann, mann..... das Geld für Strafen, Probleme, etc. die noch kommen können - da hätten FRPT ein eigenes Steuer- und Buchhaltungsbüro kaufen können...

Liebes BoD: Jetzt müßt Ihr euch wirklich Kritik anhören und dafür hoffentlich auch mal geradestehen.
Bin mal auf die Details gespannt.

... oder ist viel Show dabei ?? (Übernahme....??) Man kann in alle Richtungen spekulieren....

Wenn der nächste Auftrag endlich kommt, dann ist sowieso alles Makulatur...

running

[kyron7htx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.002.404 von coolrunning am 15.10.07 16:55:50

Ja wenn

[Highnoon120]

als Besttrafung könnte auch ein delisting avon der nasdaq anstehen, oh oh das hört sich gar nicht gut an

[sampler]

Die 22 US$ sind soeben wieder erklommen

sampler

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.003.828 von sampler am 15.10.07 17:49:20

Tendenz weiter steigend!

Ich glaube der kleine Schock wird langsam überwunden!

Die Aussichten sind einfach zu gut!!


sampler

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.004.128 von sampler am 15.10.07 18:00:49

Deutschland reagiert natürlich wieder gleich über... oder soll ich sagen panisch...

Die guten Aussichten haben sich kein bißchen geändert...
Weitere Aufträge werden kommen und wenn erst der Cheetah anrollt gibts es kein Halten mehr...


... und ich halte bis auf weiteres meine Aussage aufrecht: Irgendwann wird FRPT übernommen... dann 40 $ und mehr !

long & strong

running

[mc-plop]

Aus IV:

By: man_from_plop Send PM Profile Ignore Recommend Add To Favorites
Just Bought 400 Sh of FRPT @ $20.99 + 150 Sh @ $21.38

The people who panicked today and sold are absolute SCHMUCKS.

Does anyone else feel like me that the drop in the FRPT stock price is totally unwarranted?

I just bought 400 Sh of FRPT @ $20.99 + 150 Sh @ $21.38.

Below is my reasoning for making this ascertion:
1) There are NO RESTATEMENTS whatsoever of 2006 & 2007 financial statements in the offings. The disclosures in the Form 10K/A only pertained to 2003, 2004 & 2005, AND

2) The restatements to 2003, 2004 & 2005 financial statements were already made during the 1st Qtr of 2007 and were very minor. The net effect of all the restatements were to -
A) DECREASE NET INCOME BY $2,161,046 for 2005, AND
B) INCREASE NET INCOME BY $1,701,970 for 2004

3) LROY's message #114676 mentions the steps that FPI already took to improve the internal control over their financial reporting:
(A) FPI hired a new CFO (Mike Durski) during the first quarter of 2007,
AND
(B) FPI hired Superior Controls, Inc. to assess & enhance the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, AND
(C) FPI will implement a comprehensive electronic business operating system along with a supporting integrated ERP computer system which will significantly enhance our processes and internal control environment, and change the manner of collection, reporting and management of accounting data resulting in a further strengthening the overall reliability of financial data of the Company. ( implimenting RFI tagging as well)(A DoD requirement for Defense Co's)

In summary, there was nothing new today other than the formalized release of the Form 10K/A which noted accounting concerns that have already been addressed. FPI management did their shareholders an incredible disservice in releasing the Form 10K/A the way they did without providing a brief summary of why they made the release and highlighting the changes on the form.

I see this as nothing but an opportunity for the shorts to begin covering their 15.4M short shares once the price bottomed out under $21.

I think FPI management panicked releasing the Form 10K/A. It was probably triggered by PVI's countersuit against FPI which alleged accounting irregularities. Guess what, PVI's Tom Thebes was FPI's comptroller and for him to point out accounting irregularities during his watch, says something about how desperate PVI was to deflect attention away from FPI's suit that PVI management stole intellectual property, etc. from FPI.

This also of course will represent a chance for Melissa Davis to provide her negative spin, so she can panic FRPT shareholders into further stock selling prior to the shorts covering their 15.4M shares.

[sampler]

Ich glaube es könnte heute noch eine 0-Nummer bzw. Plus werden!

Es wird drüben alles aufgesogen


sampler

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.006.590 von sampler am 15.10.07 19:32:10

20.51 $

[coolrunning]

By Edmond Lococo
Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Force Protection Inc., the largest
supplier of blast-resistant trucks to the U.S. Marine Corps,
said it found ``material weaknesses'' in its internal control
over financial reporting. The shares fell the most in two
months.
The flaws may hurt the company's ability to report its
financial condition and results of operations accurately or on a
timely basis, Ladson, South Carolina-based Force Protection said
in a regulatory filing today.
Force Protection restated in July financial results from
2003 through 2005. Force blamed an inadequate number of staff
with sufficient accounting knowledge, resulting in a lack of
effective policies, the filing said. The company also lacked
oversight to ensure accuracy of disclosures. Those problems
hadn't been fully remedied as of Dec. 31, 2006, the filing said.
``They restated results a while back and that was evidence
that they had some financial-control issues,'' said James
McIlree, a New York-based analyst with Collins Stewart LLC.
``These are not new financial-control issues. This is stating
the obvious that, in the past, they had these issues.''
He rates the shares ``buy'' and doesn't own any. Collins
Stewart has done investment banking work for the company, and
also buys and sells the shares for clients.
Force Protection dropped $1.65, or 6.9 percent, to $22.30
at 1:20 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market composite
trading. They earlier fell as much as 14 percent to $20.50 in
the biggest decline since Aug. 8. The shares had gained 39
percent this year before today.

New Finance Chief

To help address the problems, Force hired new Chief
Financial Officer Michael Durski in the first quarter and
enlisted a professional service organization to assist with
financial reporting controls, the filing said. The three years
of restatements were made after Force discovered improper
accounting for items including stock-based compensation and rent
expenses.
``We must perform extensive additional work to obtain
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial
statements,'' the filing said. ``This work will continue through
the balance 2007 and perhaps beyond. There can be no assurance
as to when all of the material weaknesses will be remedied.''
Tom Corbett, an outside spokesman for Force Protection with
Financial Relations Board in Chicago, said he didn't immediately
have additional information available on the filing.
--Editor: Wright (wsd/jcl).

To contact the reporter on this story:
Edmond Lococo in Boston at [phone] or
[e-mail].

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Chapin Wright in New York at [phone] or
[e-mail].

running

[coolrunning]

Market Scan
Force Protection's Ongoing Accounting Lapses
Evelyn M. Rusli, 10.15.07, 2:20 PM ET

Force Protection

In Force Protection's case, a financial restatement can have more bark than actual bite. Or so claims one analyst.

On Monday, shares of the armored vehicle maker plunged more than 14.4% in morning trading, amid investor anxiety over the company's latest Securities Exchange Commission filing.

In an annual report amendment, Force Protection (nasdaq: FRPT - news - people ) acknowledged accounting problems in 2006 and 2007. In one document, the Ladson, S.C.-based company said its "disclosure controls were not effective as of December 31, 2005 because of certain material weaknesses." Meanwhile, in another document, Force Protection also said that "internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31. 2006, because of certain material weaknesses." According to these reports, the central problem was an inexperienced staff that did not execute proper accounting procedures.

In Force Protection's words: "We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience with the Company and training in the application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. The lack of a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience with our Company and training contributed to multiple control problems."

Despite the steep, initial share plunge, Force Protection's stock steadily climbed back to a 6.8% decline, or $1.64, to $22.31 in afternoon trading.

As investors hit the panic button, Dougherty & Company analyst Joe Maxa said there was no real news in the reports and that the negative reaction was overblown. In the past, the company has restated reports for 2003 through 2005, also citing problems with the personnel handling accounting issues.

The filings, according to Maxa, simply add language to accounting problems that were already disclosed. "It is not a meaningful event," he said. He also believes Force Protection has taken steps to correct its problems.

According to one filing, the company has worked towards shoring up its accounting practices, by hiring a new chief financial officer in 2007, Michael S. Durski, and hiring a "professional service organization which specializes in the assessment and the enhancement of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting." In addition, the company is also using computer systems to "enhance our processes and internal control environment, and change the manner of collection, reporting and management of accounting data." Maxa said that as long as these controls hold up, Force Protection should be able to proceed without any accounting problems in the future.

He remains positive on the stock, with a "buy" rating and $30 price target.

Over the past year, Force Protection's stock has been battered by competition, as unlikely rivals such as Navistar and General Dynamics (nyse: GD - news - people ) have won lucrative armored-vehicle contracts from the government. Under the government's Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle program, the Army is expected to award contracts to produce at least 23,000 armored vehicles in the next few years (See: "Force Protection Battered By Rivals." )

-- The Associated Press contributed to this report.

running

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.013.540 von coolrunning am 16.10.07 00:08:32

"It is not a meaningful event,"

jep so seh ich das auch... normale konsolidierung und die news wurde genutzt

[DollarPenny]

Ich warte noch ab. Bid & ASK ist weit auseinander.

Das wird heute nochmal kurz runter gehen. Dann kann man in Ruhe wieder nachladen.

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.003.750 von Highnoon120 am 15.10.07 17:46:24

als Besttrafung könnte auch ein delisting avon der nasdaq anstehen, oh oh das hört sich gar nicht gut an

...und direkt zu den Pinksheets zu unserem größtem Konkurrenten Navistar (NAVZ.PK).

Nein, Spaß beiseite, das kann nicht sein.

Hier läuft was anderes ab, habe keine Ahnung was, aber ich hoffe
es wird gut.

Was auch noch nicht geklärt ist:

Force Protection, Inc. Awarded Additional ILAV Vehicle Contract
Monday October 8, 8:30 am ET

LADSON, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Leading armored vehicle manufacturer Force Protection, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRPT - News) today announced that it has received a purchase order from BAE Systems for an additional 45 Iraq Light Armored Vehicles (ILAV). In addition to Iraq, approximately 18 of these vehicles are bound for Yemen. The order is worth an estimated $3.5 million and will be completed by February 2008.

Was steckt dahinter???

[edeka1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.018.737 von charlie01 am 16.10.07 09:59:09

Hallo,
lies dir das mal in aller Ruhe durch. Es ist ein Artikel der heute in der Zeitung erscheinen wird und der diese verwirrende Meldung von gestern relativiert. http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=115103&pt=…


Eigentlich ist überhaupt nichts negatives passiert. Aber es wird von gewissen Leuten, gnadenlos ausgenutzt.

Bis mitte November müssen alle Naked Short Anteile (SHO)eingesammelt sein, das ist ein weiterer Grund warum es die nächsten Wochen ziemlich heftig werden wird.

Die Hedge Fonds werden dafür sorgen, das sie nicht zu hoch covern müssen.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.018.737 von charlie01 am 16.10.07 09:59:09

Habe vor kurzem in IV gelesen das sich das ganze aus 77 T$ je Fahrzeug für Lizenzgebühren und Service zusammensetzt und somit fast als Netto in die Bilanz geht, habe auch auch keine richtige Quelle dafür, ich glaub es hatte MR. Zippy geschrieben..

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.020.218 von edeka1 am 16.10.07 10:59:07

..Bis mitte November müssen alle Naked Short Anteile (SHO)eingesammelt sein, das ist ein weiterer Grund warum es die nächsten Wochen ziemlich heftig werden wird...


Das erklärt auch den stetigen Kursanstieg nach dem Tagestief gestern!!


sampler

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.020.218 von edeka1 am 16.10.07 10:59:07

Wie vermutet alles halb so wild. Viel Wirbel um nichts.
Aber trotzdem, wie du schon sagst, wird es noch einen heftigen
Kampf die nächsten Wochen geben.

Mal sehen ob Pagitz sein GAP bei 18,5$ dann doch noch geschlossen
wird. Unmöglich scheint hier nichts zu sein.

gruß
charlie01

[coolrunning]

32 $ Kursziel ist auch erst mal o.k.

Bumps in the road
By NOELLE PHILLIPS - [e-mail]
FORCE PROTECTION INC.

Armored-vehicle maker’s stocks dip after report of accounting weaknesses

Force Protection Inc.’s vehicles protect soldiers from roadside bomb blasts, but those sturdy steel vehicles couldn’t prevent damage to the company’s stocks Monday.

The Ladson-based armored-vehicle maker reported weaknesses in its accounting systems, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The company previously restated its annual reports for 2003 through 2005 and amended its 2006 annual report, according to filings.

The disclosures caused Force Protection’s shares to drop 5 percent to $22.70. The stock fell as much as 14 percent during the day.

The company did not find any errors in its accounting but discovered it did not have proper controls in place, Force Protection spokesman Tommy Pruitt said.

Pruitt did not offer specific problems that had been identified. But an example of accounting control would be requiring separate employees cutting and signing checks.

In its SEC filings, the company said the lack of controls was a result of inexperienced accountants. The company grew fast, and accounting standards had not caught up with those set by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pruitt said.

The disclosures did not worry analyst Joe Maxa, who tracks Force Protection for Dougherty & Co., a Minneapolis investment firm.

“The numbers will not change,” he said.

James McIlree, an analyst with Collins Stewart investment firm, said reports of accounting weaknesses are fairly common in fast-growing companies. Collins Stewart has done investment banking work for Force Protection.

“A lot of companies, especially ones that are small and growing quickly, have had problems complying with the requirements for control,” McIlree said. “It doesn’t say their accounting is no good. It’s not up to the standards of Sarbanes-Oxley.”

McIlree continued recommending Force Protection stock, saying he listed it as a “buy” with a $32 per share price target.

Pruitt said Force Protection expects to pass a full Sarbanes-Oxley audit by the end of the year.

“We’re just trying to stay in compliance with what the SEC requires us to do,” he said.

Reach Phillips at [phone].


running

[coolrunning]

Das Spiel der shorts geht noch bis November.

Ich hoffe es knallt vorher richtig

news - und dann unaufhaltsam nach oben...


http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=132&mn=115136&pt=…

running

[hardy4you]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.021.156 von sampler am 16.10.07 11:38:01

"Das erklärt auch den stetigen Kursanstieg nach dem Tagestief gestern!!"

..könnte System haben, siehe auch heute.

[illi1]

unter momentanen umständen halte ich es nicht für möglich bei sinkenden kurs die aktien zu covern!!!
ich denke das spiegelt auch der derzeitige kurs wieder!
weiterhin bleibt die marke von 24 Dollar im Fokus!


September End Month 2007
Short
Interest Percent
Change Average Daily
Share Volume Days to
Cover
FRPT Force Protection, Inc. - Common Stock 15,404,281 0.67 1,662,720 9.26

[DollarPenny]

denke es wird heute nochmal gerüttelt, bei 18,5$ muß aber schluß sein.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.040.820 von DollarPenny am 17.10.07 08:12:02

wohl kaum, eher ein SK > 24 $

[coolrunning]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.040.820 von DollarPenny am 17.10.07 08:12:02

Willst wohl noch mal rein.... oder nachkaufen

[DollarPenny]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.041.565 von coolrunning am 17.10.07 09:07:24

Bid und Ask gefällt mir nicht. Hab aber gestern schön bei unter 15€ eingelagert. Sollte es heute Richtung 13€ gehen wird nochmal zugeschlagen.

[coolrunning]

es wollen wesentlich mehr kaufen, als verkaufen

Da müssen sich die shorties aber ganz schön anstrengen, um unter 23 $ zu drücken....

Schafft ihr - glaube ich - heute nicht


running

[hardy4you]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.031.673 von hardy4you am 16.10.07 20:08:25

"..könnte System haben, siehe auch heute."

[coolrunning]

Guten Morgen !

Ein schöner Anstieg nachbörslich.
Gestern haben die shorties verloren...

Mal sehen, wie es die nächsten Tage aussieht.

Nachbörsliche Kurse:
19:57 $ 24.24 100
19:56 $ 24.25 500
19:54 $ 24.24 400
19:17 $ 24.30 1,000
19:14 $ 24.30 1,000
18:56 $ 24.30 100
18:49 $ 24.30 1,000
18:34 $ 24 300
18:33 $ 23.95 250
18:23 $ 23.95 250
18:19 $ 24 200
18:00 $ 23.85 950
17:59 $ 23.85 1,000
17:59 $ 23.85 1,000
17:58 $ 23.85 1,000
17:57 $ 23.85 100
17:55 $ 23.85 500
17:54 $ 23.85 1,550
17:53 $ 23.85 600
17:49 $ 23.85 1,000
17:47 $ 23.85 100
17:47 $ 23.85 100
17:40 $ 23.85 100
17:32 $ 23.80 1,000
17:32 $ 23.85 2,000
17:13 $ 23.60 500
17:08 $ 23.36 500
17:08 $ 23.35 500

running

[DollarPenny]

denke auch das es wieder stark nach oben geht. 35$ sollten dann das KZ sein.

[mc-plop]

Top Artikel aus IV:

Three manufacturers that currently build MRAPs

Three companies are selected and three companies are building MRAPs.

http://www.americanmachinist.com/304/Issue/Article/False/723…

Manufacturers Answer Call for More
Larry Haftl
10/10/2007

The U.S Department of Defense is demanding more Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles (MRAPs). Manufacturers are answering that call for increased production while they turn out improved versions of the vehicles. MRAPs provide greater protection for U.S. military personnel in theaters of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Three manufacturers that currently build MRAPs — Force Protection Industries, Inc. near Charleston, S.C. (www.forceprotection.net), International Military Vehicles LLC (part of International Truck’s Navistar Division) in Warrenville, Ill. (www.internationaldelivers.com), and BAE Systems, Inc. in Rockville, Maryland (www.baesystems.com) — follow the automotive production model of concentrating on design and assembly in-house while outsourcing part production. Because the work is for the Department of Defense, the outsourcing of parts for these vehicles goes to U.S. suppliers, giving U.S. machine shops opportunities to earn money while they help to keep troops safe.

MRAPs are a relatively new type of vehicle. As the war in Iraq shifted from conventional to guerrilla warfare, the need for specialized armored vehicles shifted from tanks and traditional armored personnel carriers to these heavily reinforced personnel carriers. Military troops can’t patrol an urban neighborhood effectively if they are buttoned up in vehicles such as an M1 Abrams tank. They need patrol vehicles that provide them good visibility of what is happening around them while offering protection from enemy fire.

At the outset of the war in Iraq the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (the Humvee) was the primary vehicle used for urban partrols. The Humvee is the original, military version of the Hummer, the civilian model of the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle that such high-profile cebrities as California’s Governor, Arnold Schwartzenegger drives.

A fully-armored Humvee offers protection from gunfire while giving its occupants clear views of the surrounding area, and as the war went from invasion to occupation, the Humvee became the preferred troop carrier of choice for U.S. Army and Marine commanders.

Unfortunately, the Humvee has a design characteristic that guerrilla insurgents began to attack.

The Humvee floor is flat, and was found to be vulnerable. If a land mine is detonated beneath the vehicle, the energy from the blast can be directed into its cabin with fatal results. It is that Humvee underbelly that the roadside bombs – improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan try to get to, and in many cases, succeeded. And, as the guerrillas changed their tactics, the U.S. military changed its tactics too.

The U.S. military’s response was a new type of patrol vehicle, the MRAP.

The U.S. Marine Corps plans to replace all Humvees in the Iraq and Afghanistan combat zones with MRAP vehicles. MRAPs are considered an “urgent need” for the military, and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that acquisition of the vehicles has become the highest priority for the Department of Defense. The U.S. Government set aside $1.1 billion dollars to acquire these vehicles in fiscal 2007 and, legislation to continue—and perhaps increase— that funding for 2008 is pending in Congress.

The Department of Defense recently said that it could require more than 18,000 MRAP vehicles, at a cost of nearly $20 billion.

The reason that MRAPs have become the preferred vehicle is because they have a “V” shaped underbody that helps to deflect blasts from land mines or improvised explosive devices away from the vehicle’s interior. That armored underbody keeps the vehicle’s occupants safe and the vehicle intact.

The basic design is not new. It was first used by South Africa in the 1970s and has been used by other nations since then. The U.S. military had no need for this type of vehicle until the Iraq war and now there is an urgent demand to deploy MRAPs as quickly and as extensively as possible.

There are currently three categories of MRAPs based on vehicle weight class and size. Category 1 is the Mine Resistant Utility Vehicle (MRUV), a smaller, lighter vehicle that is designed primarily for urban operations. Typical vehicles in this class are the Force Protection Cougar H 4X4, International MaxxPro, and BAE RG- 31 and RG-33.

Category 2 includes the Joint Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) and Rapid Response Vehicle (JERR V) vehicles that are used for troop transportation and ambulances, as explosive ordnance disposal vehicles and as lead vehicles in convoys. The Force Protection Cougar HE 6x6, the BAE RG-33L 6x6, and the International MaxxPro XL are models in this category.

Category 3 comprises the largest MRAP vehilces, including the Buffalo made by Force Protection. The Buffalo is the first MRAP to become a movie star: Is was one of the vehicles used in recently released movie “Transformers,” made by the Dreamworks Studio.

Even as the Department of Defense issues contracts to build more MRAPs, the designs for the vehicles are changing.

In July, the Marine Corps issued an MRAP II presolicitation for vehicles that provide more protection than the current MRAP designs. Current designs are not always effective against Explosively Formed Penetrators (EFP) that use shaped charges to project a hypervelocity jet of metal that is capable of cutting through thick armor. The use of explosively formed penetrators has increased in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, even as the wide-spread deployment of the current models of MRAPs has helped to reduce casualties by improvised explosive devices as much as 80 percent. The U.S. Marine Corps expects that the next generation of MRAPs will continue to reduce casualties.

Force Protection, Inc. assembles its Buffalo and Cougar models at its South Carolina facility and is opening a new facility in Roxboro, North Carolina to assemble the its newest design, the Cheetah.

Tommy Pruit, spokesman for Force Protection, said all of his company’s machining is outsourced.

Force protection focuses on design, development and final assembly. Suppliers interested in working with Force Protection can find information about gaining contracts by going to the company’s website, (www.forceprotection.net). Information on becoming a supplier can be found by clicking on the “Contacts” button in the menu at the top of the page, then selecting “Supplier Contacts”. Interested suppliers can choose category from the drop-down menu, then use the link provided to send an initial email to the company.

Pruit said his company has enough suppliers at the moment, but added that Force Protection may need additional suppliers as it increases production to meet the increasing demand for its vehicles. He said now would be a good time for a new supplier to begin the qualification process.

International Military Vehicles LLC is part of International Truck’s Navistar Division. While the company’s headquarters is in Warrenville, Ill., its fabrication and assembly is done in several widely scattered locations.

Engines are built in the company’s Melrose Park, Ill. facility. Chasses are fabricated in its Garland, Texas facility. Subassemblies and other parts are shipped to the company’s West Point, Miss. facility for final assembly.

As with Force Protection, the best way to approach International is through its website at(www.internationaldelivers.com). Information for the company’s “Supplier Network” is provided as an option under the “Corporate Info” button on the left side of its home page.. The Supplier Network option will take you to a page that has information for new and current suppliers. That page includes news, requirements for doing business with International, and the company’s terms and conditions, and contacts. This information is available for working with International Truck on contracts for its military and other vehicles.

Contacting BAE Systems, Inc. is not quite as easy as contacting the other companies.

The company is headquartered in Rockville, Md., and is the U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems, Plc., a global aerospace and defense manufacturer based in the United Kingdom.

BAE makes products for a wide range of applications from submarines and naval surface fleet to land armaments and aircraft.

To find out how to do business with the company, go to its corporate website at (www.baesystems.com). Once there, select the “About Us” option and then choose the “Supplier Centre” button on the left side of the page. On the Supplier Centre page choose the “Supply Chain” link on the right side of the page. On the Supply Chain page select “Contact Us” on the bottom of the left side. After all that you will get telephone numbers and email addresses for the company’s contacts in London.

It is more than a pun to say that the market for MRAPs is exploding. More than 6,000 of these vehicles are scheduled to be built this year, and current estimates say that more than 18,000 of these vehicles will be built over the next few years. Tens of billions of dollars will be spent by the Pentagon over the next few years as it rearms and reequips the U.S. military, and MRAPs are a big part of that rearmament. Now is the time to start looking for contracts to machine parts for those vehicles.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.062.086 von DollarPenny am 18.10.07 10:56:44

Army selects three companies to build MRAPs

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/10/army_mrapcontract_0710…

Army selects three companies to build MRAPs

By Gina Cavallaro - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Oct 17, 2007 19:08:38 EDT

The Army has awarded contracts for producing more than 8,000 mine resistant ambush protected vehicles to three vendors, selected from a list of six companies and teams that submitted vehicles for testing.

The Army is expected to announce the names of the companies by the end of this week, according to an Army officer with knowledge of the acquisition process who spoke on the condition that he remain anonymous.

The production of up to 8,700 MRAPs will be paid for with the $5.2 billion contained in the current continuing resolution, he said, which will affect other Army projects, such as military construction, which rely on those funds to keep projects moving until the budget is signed.

The Army was going to purchase 17,000 MRAPs because of requirements identified by commanders in Iraq who wanted to replace each Humvee in the war zone. That number, however, was lowered to 10,000 in September, and may change again depending on the vehicle’s performance in country, according to Claude Bolton, assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, technology and logistics.

In the past year, 375 MRAPs have been shipped to Iraq, including 42 of the 14-ton, four-wheel-drive Category I MRAPs and 13 of the 24-ton, six-wheel-drive Category II MRAPs.

The two-month contest for the MRAP II contract that closed Oct. 1, the first day of fiscal 2008, procured vehicles that could move faster, offer better protection for troops against lethal projectiles, such as explosively formed penetrators, and have a capacity to carry more armor than the varieties that emerged in the past year.


Na da wirds wohl heute und morgen erstmal richtg abgehen .

[mc-plop]

By: mrzippy Send PM Profile Ignore Recommend Add To Favorites
Everyone must read this

For all of my friends at Yahoo and Raging Bull - you are welcome.


Defense: Pentagon Narrows MRAP I Suppliers Down to Three;

Awards Likely This Friday

• Pentagon has reduced the number of Mine Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) I

suppliers from five to three for ease of maintenance, according to sources. We believe

these three companies are likely to receive MRAP orders later this week from the $5.2 billion

Continuing Resolution (CR) funding. These three companies are Force Protection (FRPT,

Not Covered [NC]), Navistar (NAVZ, NC), and BAE Systems (BAESY, NC). Designs by

General Dynamics (GD, NC) and Armor Holdings (acquired by BAE Systems) will be

eliminated from future MRAP I procurement.

• According to Hill sources, CR funding can purchase between 2,200 - 2,400 units due to a

lower cost estimate after the increase of official MRAP requirement from 8,000 to over

15,000 units. Previously, Pentagon had budgeted $5.2 billion in CR funding from

approximately 1,500 units of MRAP. Therefore, we expect each one of the three MRAP I

suppliers to receive approximately 800 units ($400 million) in order shortly based on equal

distribution of the available CR funding to keep their production lines running. This is

consistent with Force Protection’s expectation of a near-term order for 800 units.

• MRAP Funding Update: In our view, we will unlikely see a passage of the FY08 defense

appropriations and supplemental bill before Thanksgiving. However, the chairman of the

Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee, Senator Inouye (D-Hawaii) has pledged to pay

for all MRAP vehicles the Pentagon has requested, which is a total of $16.8 billion for close

to 9,000 additional MRAP vehicles in FY08. If the supplemental bill is not finalized by

November, Congress will support another Continuing Resolution with another $11.5

billion for MRAP to avoid a break in production if the supplemental is not finalized by

November 15.

• MRAP Requirement Review: According to Inside Defense, Pentagon leaders plan to review

the official MRAP requirement early next year to consider a possible increase. We believe

this will coincide with a renewed debate in Congress on Senator Biden’s (D-Del.)

amendment to add $23.6 billion for MRAP in the FY08 supplemental. In our view, final

MRAP demand for FY08 will likely be somewhere between the current 15,374 and

Biden’s 23,000 units, driven by factors like timing and level of troop drawdown and

industrial capacity.

[mc-plop]

Lococo Article siting "Congressional Sources" Contracts this week

Force Protection, Navistar, BAE May Win Blast-Proof Truck Award
2007-10-17 16:47 (New York)


By Edmond Lococo
Oct. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Force Protection Inc., Navistar
International Corp. and BAE Systems PLC may win orders to build
more blast-resistant trucks for the U.S. military as soon as
this week, according to a report from the Stanford Group.
Each of the three companies may get awards valued at
approximately $400 million for about 800 of the trucks,
Washington-based Stanford said in a note to clients today. The
report cited Congressional sources it didn't identify.

[sampler]

Was ist das hier heute ruhig?

Wartet ihr alle auf die 25,-US$?

Das wird wohl nicht mehr lange dauern


sampler

[Boersenkrieger]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.062.296 von mc-plop am 18.10.07 11:11:54

puuuh dann wird das ja spannend.... wer fliegt wohl raus ? FRPT ging als einziger mit über 5% nennenswert runter

[meier1]

Sieht dann auf dem Chart von heute leider so aus.

[mickymoto]

Gerade bestätigt: Neuer 380 Mio Auftrag für FRPT:

http://www.defenselink.mil/contracts/contract.aspx?contracti…

Force Protection Industries, Inc., Ladson, S.C., is being awarded $376,644,117 for firm-fixed-priced delivery order #0006 under previously awarded contract (M67854-07-D-5031) for the purchase of 553 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I vehicles and 247 MRAP Category II vehicles and vehicle sustainment Integrated Logistic Support. Work will be performed in Ladson, S.C., and work is expected to be completed April 2008. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

[pes05]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.076.351 von mickymoto am 18.10.07 23:46:01

1000 stk. bis April hätten wir wohl nicht liefern können?

[sampler]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.076.351 von mickymoto am 18.10.07 23:46:01

Kam die Meldung nachbörslich?

Wenn ja, dann konnten die Amis nicht mehr reagieren

sampler

[coolrunning]

Hier ist die gesamte Verteilung !

International Military and Government LLC (IMG), Warrenville, Ill., is being awarded $509,241,000 for firm-fixed-priced delivery order #0005 under previously awarded contract (M67854-07-D-5032) for 1,000 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I Low Rate Initial Production vehicles. Category I is a MRAP vehicle used by the Marine Corps and other Joint Forces for convoy operations. The MRAP vehicles are required to increase the survivability and mobility of troops operating in hazardous fire areas against known threats such as improvised explosive devices, small arms fire and mines. Work will be performed in West Point, Miss., and work is expected to be completed April 2008. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

Force Protection Industries, Inc., Ladson, S.C., is being awarded $376,644,117 for firm-fixed-priced delivery order #0006 under previously awarded contract (M67854-07-D-5031) for the purchase of 553 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category I vehicles and 247 MRAP Category II vehicles and vehicle sustainment Integrated Logistic Support. Work will be performed in Ladson, S.C., and work is expected to be completed April 2008. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

BAE Systems Land & Armaments, LP, Ground Systems Division, York, Pa., is being awarded $278,441,800 firm fixed priced delivery order #0005 under previously awarded contract (M67854-07-D-5025) for the purchase of 399 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Category II vehicles and 112 MRAP Category II Ambulance Variant vehicles. Work will be performed in York, Pa., and work is expected to be completed by April 2008. Contract funds will not expire by the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

BAE Systems Land & Armaments, LP, Ground Systems Division, York, Pa., is being awarded $44,339,800 for firm fixed priced delivery order #0004 under previously awarded contract ( M67854-07-D-5025) for the purchase of 89 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle Category I United States Special Operations Command Variants and vehicle sustainment Integrated Logistic Support. Work will be performed in York, Pa., and is expected to be completed by March 2008. Contract funds will not expire by the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was competitively procured. The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Va., is the contracting activity.

Das ist doch wunderbar, da wird es weiter aufwärts gehen. Alles bis April... da kommen Ende des Jahres weitere Aufträge, da sich die Lieferkapazitäten erhöhen werden.

Wir haben zwar nicht den Bärenanteil bekommen, sind aber nun fest etabliert unter den Großen - the big Three

Ich bleibe bei meinem Kursziel von 30-35 €. 70 - 100 % sind hier noch locker drin.
Warten wir auf die ersten Cheetah-Aufträge....

running

[coolrunning]

Ach ja - ich verabschiede mich für eine Woche und wünsche uns allen weiterhin steigende Kurse.

running

[Heyjoe]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.078.888 von coolrunning am 19.10.07 09:04:59

schönen urlaub oder herbstferien (bist wohl aus niedersachsen?) wünsche ich dir und vielen dank für deine regelmäßigen infos und wohltuend sachlichen (kurz)kommentare. grüße von heyjoe (der hier meistens nur mitliest)!

[charlie01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.078.868 von coolrunning am 19.10.07 09:03:14

Wir haben zwar nicht den Bärenanteil bekommen, sind aber nun fest etabliert unter den Großen - the big Three

So ist es, kaum zu glauben - das sind BIG NEWS

Jeder der drei baut die Stückzahlen die max. geliefert werden können.

Hier noch die Preise pro Stück:

FRPT 376,6 / 800 = 470.750$
BAE 322,7 / 600 = 537.800$
NAVZ 509,2 / 1000 = 509.200$

[pagitz01]

also bis 1 dezember werden nochmal ein paar tausend geordert und das nur merh von 3 firmen,ich finde die news und das was dazwischen steht einfach sehr gut !!!

aber könnte mir nen abtaucher der aktie leider vorstellen da wird gedruckt was das zeigt hält!!!

ein minus heute würde mich nicht wudern!!!!

bis ende dez.40 usd wäre eigentlich auch nicht mehr verwunderlich!!!

bis dann!!

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.083.766 von pagitz01 am 19.10.07 14:05:24

Also eigentlich müsste der sichere Ausblick auf die 2200 Stück Order bis zum 1. Dezember 07 zusätzlich zu der 800 Stück Order von gestern den Aktienkurs ordentlich beflügeln.

Wir sind unter den Big Three und haben 33 % sicher jetzt und in Zukunft, da dürfte wohl nichts mehr schief gehen.

Dazu kommt in den nächsten Wochen noch:

- die austehende 180 Stück Buffalo Order
- die austehende 140 Stück Mastiff Order
- die erste Cheetah Order 100 - 250 Stück
- die ersten Aufträge für EFP-Panzerung
- wohl sehr positive Q3-Zahlen



Nichtsdestotrotz rechne ich heute auch mit einem leichten Intradayschwinger Richtung 22 $ und dann aber mit einem fulminanten Anstieg mit einem SK zwischen 23,50 und 24 $.

[mickymoto]

Vorbörslich geht's zumindest aufwärts. Yahoo Finance zeigt gerade U.S. Pre-Market-Kurse von USD 23,74 (+5,42 %) an.

[Kowloon]

Man kann auch wirklich alles negativ sehen (der Dame gehört irgendwann mal das Maul gestopft):

http://biz.yahoo.com/ts/071018/10385380.html?.v=2

Hört eigentlich irgendjemand auf die über dem großen Teich?

Gruß,
Kowloon

[pagitz01]

NERVIG!!!!!

[tommy19980]

!

Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an [e-mail]

[kyron7htx]

Neuer Auftrag und -10%. Versteh das wer will!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

jetzt wird aber abgeladen, das ist eine echte Flucht aus der Aktie.
ich habe eben eine Kauforder abgegeben und innerhalb von Sekunden weit unter meiner Eingabe bekommen.

[kyron7htx]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.086.659 von wohinistmeinGeld am 19.10.07 17:16:29

Wieso Flucht. Es gibt doch keine schlechten sondern gute Nachrichten.

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.086.697 von kyron7htx am 19.10.07 17:18:25

wenn aber billiger hergegeben wird als man ordert und die order auch noch so schnell ausgeführt wird, dann will man raus koste es was es wolle. Das war mal anders, da mußte man bei Kauforder froh sein, wenn es nicht zu Teilausführungen kam.
Gut, meine 1200 St die ich gerade bekommen habe sind ja nicht gerade ein riesen Geschäft, aber trotzdem, sie wollten ihre so schnell wie möglich los werden.

[Guerilla Investor]

Oha ... jetzt gibts mächtig auf die Mütze ...

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.087.332 von Guerilla Investor am 19.10.07 17:55:20

wow

du bist aber ein ganz hells köpfchen!!!!

[Guerilla Investor]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.087.402 von pagitz01 am 19.10.07 17:59:46

Ich weiß ...

[mc-plop]

Mal was Handfestes aus IV:

Msg: 116722 of 116724 10/19/2007 12:53:31 PM Recs: 0 Sentiment: Not Disclosed
By: man_from_plop Send PM Profile Ignore Recommend Add To Favorites
Just Bought 400 Sh FRPT @ $20

I thought that it looked like a good time to buy a few more shares of FRPT.

The picture got a whole lot clearer this week and I like what I see:
1) FPI received orders for 800 more MRAP vehicles (valued at $376M) and 140 more Mastiffs (est. value approx. $180M), AND

2) FPI was named as 1 of 3 companies (NAV & BAE are the other 2) who the US Army will be ordering future MRAPs from. This was extremely important since both GD & AH were eliminated, AND

3) FPI has had recent interest from up to 11 foreign countries for its Cheetah & Mastiff vehicles. Those countries include Great Britain, Spain, Canada, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, among others, AND

4) FD's joint production capacity will increase to 355 vehicles by 12/07, and will continue to increase into 2008, AND

5) A big wild card is FPI's EFP armoring which purportedly can be applied to Strykers, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, FPI's vehicles, and other MRAPs. No word has been provided as to whether the DoD has chosen to use FPI's armoring, but its retail price is estimated to be around $150K/vehicle and could be an enormous windfall to FPI. I would find it to be a welcome surprise if it was ordered for the MRAPs already in theater, and/or those being bid for the MRAP II competition, AND

6) Obviously, with yesterday's FPI MRAP order and this week's Mastiff order, FPI's future revenues will increase by (1/2 * $376M) + Approx. $180M = $368M or $368M / 68M shares = $5.41 in revenue for each share of FRPT. This will provide FRPT with around 2 1/2 months worth of order volume (ie: 940 vehicles / 400 vehicle prod. capacity) to fill in 2008, AND

7) The likelihood that MRAP II will lead to another $8.2B to be split among 3 contractors (FPI, NAV & BAE) will result in the FD jv getting approx. another $2.7B with FPI's share being $1.35B or $1.35B / 68M shares = $19.85 in revenue for each share of FRPT. This will provide FPI with approx. another 6.75 months worth of contract work ($1.35B contract value / approx. $500K/vehicle = 2.7K vehicles / 400 vehicles/month = 6.75 months) to fill later in 2008, AND

8) Add into 2008, the Cheetah sales based on 2,000 produced @ $320k/cheetah and you get another $640M or $9.41 in additional revenues ($640M revenues / 68M shares) for each share of FRPT, AND

9) Add into 2008, the Buffalo sales base on 144 produced (12 Buffalos / month * 12 months) using their dedicated Buffalo production line, resulting in a contribution to Top Line revenue = $122.4M (144 buffalos * $850K/ buffalo), AND

10) ILS revenues on the existing vehicles in service, plus the new vehicles being shipped could add another $200M to $300M in top line revenues for year 2008, AND

11) The arrival of an early December 2007 deadline (whatever the date is that is 35 business days after October 13th) for the Naked Short shares in FRPT to be bought back by either the short or his brokerage firm, AND

*** FOR 2008, My Total Top Line Revenue Estimate is therefore:
Cougar Vehicle Deliveries: (400/month * 12 months * $500K) = $2.40B
Buffalo Vehicle Deliveries: (12/month * 12 months * $850K) = $0.12B
Cheetah Vehicle Deliveries: (2000/year * $325K) = $0.64B
ILS Revenue: (Use Midpoint of $200M to $300M range) = $0.25B
Grand Total Year 2008 Top Line Revenues = $3.412B

Special Notes: I assumed future Cougar orders will result to cover the last 3 1/4 months of Cougar production for 2008. Also, the Cheetah vehicle number is based on FPI's target production figure for 2008, and is based on the anticipation of future orders from the US and foreign countries that will cover or exceed the 2,000 figure used.

Just think using FPI's 24% Gross Profit Margin from Qtr2 2007, you get total Gross Profit in year 2008 of approx. $818.88M (3.412B * 24%). If we assume that approx. 60% of the gross profit will go toward paying interest and income taxes, then I still come up with $327.55M ($818.88 * 40%) in NET PROFIT, or $4.82/share in EPS. Multiplying $4.82/share * PE Multiple = 15 will result in a market price of $72.25. This figure is in my view very conservative considering that my above pricing model values EFP armoring revenues at $0. Of course, if the DoD utilizes FPI's EFP armoring solution, then we could be looking at substantially higher gross revenues for a product with a much higher profit margin than that from vehicle production.

Potential Contributions to Income From EFP Armoring Product:
For 1,000 FPI Vehicles Only: 1,000 units * $150K/unit = $150M * 24% GP = $36M
For 5,000 Vehicles (FPI + Other Vendors): 5,000 units * $150K/unit * 24% GP = $180M.

Multiplying either the $36M or $180M Gross Profit Figures by 40% (ie: Subtracting Income Taxes & Interest) results in another $14.4M (or $0.21/share) or $72M (or $1.06/share) that can be added to NET PROFIT. Based on using a PE Multiple = 15, an announcement by the DoD of using the EFP armoring solution would likely add another $3.00/share to $16/share to the FRPT market price based on applying the armoring 1,000 vehicles or 5,000 vehicles respectively.

I don't know why people choose to sell FRPT shares. In the meantime I'll look to buy more shares as they become available.

Good luck to all FRPT longs.

[mc-plop]

Und noch mehr Übernahmespekulationen von Motley Fool:

Motley Fool Article

http://msn.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2007/10/19/force-p…


Force Protection Dances a Jig
By Rich Smith October 19, 2007

At first glance, I suppose I see TheStreet.com's point. In a column yesterday, Jim Cramer's mouthpiece argued that a $1.2 billion Pentagon award to produce additional mine-resistant, ambush-protected armored vehicles (MRAPs) was a bad thing for Force Protection (Nasdaq: FRPT).

After all, it's not as if Force got the whole award to itself -- or even the lion's share. Fact is, the greatest number of MRAPs was awarded to perhaps the least likely of the candidates -- NYSE-delisted truck maker Navistar, which was asked to produce 1,000 of the beasts for a cool $509.2 million. Force came in second in the MRAP lottery, with a contract to build 800 Cougars for $376.6 million. Third place went to Britain's BAE Systems, which will build 600 Chargers and similar MRAPS for $322.8 million. (Average per-vehicle cost, for those who are counting: $538,000 for BAE's various flavors of MRAP; $509,200 for Navistar's MaxxPro offering; and a mere $470,750 for Force's vehicles -- presumably Cougars.)

Actually, though, we can't expect Force to get even the full $376.6 million. Production constraints that forced it into bed with General Dynamics (NYSE: GD) last year mean Force will likely have to make use of its joint venture with armored-vehicle behemoth Force Dynamics and split the pot with its partner.

Sorry, dance card full
Left out in the cold in this deal are still-NYSE-listed truck maker Oshkosh (NYSE: OSK) and its BULL-ish beau, Ceradyne (Nasdaq: CRDN). But yesterday's big news wasn't just who won and who lost out -- it was who might win in the future, and who for-sure won't. Here, Fools, is where I see the real good news for Force Protection -- and improved potential for the company to join its fellow Motley Fool Rule Breakers picks in the winners' column of our portfolio.

Musical chairs
If war is good for profits, then xenophobia may be even better. In the past, the Pentagon had assured that it would do its utmost to get as many IED-proof vehicles as possible in the theater, as soon as possible -- regardless of who built them. But yesterday, it announced that in the future it would not be entertaining bids from two (sort of) foreign builders: General Dynamics subsidiary "Land Systems-Canada" and the now-foreign-owned Armor Holdings, which BAE bought earlier this year. Past MRAP contracts, you may recall, have been repeatedly given to General D's Land Systems-Canada unit, only to have the bulk of the work performed by various BAE subsidiaries. The Pentagon seems willing to allow BAE's U.S. subsidiary, BAE North America, to keep building MRAPs, however. And of course, the General's still free to keep building here in the States.

So perhaps "xenophobia" is too strong a word. After all, the Pentagon did provide a logical reason for its decision. Namely, it said it wants to keep down the maintenance costs by moving toward a more standardized fleet of MRAPs in the theater. It's a logical argument, reminiscent of JetBlue's decision to fly only one type of airplane initially (and just look what's happened to JetBlue since it changed its mind about that).

Still, the fact remains that the Pentagon seems to have chosen its preferred MRAP providers. General D, BAE North America, Navistar, and Force Protection are in. BAE/Armor Holdings and General D-North-of-the-Border are out. Also out, and perhaps this time for good, is Oshkosh. With it, I suspect, may go Ceradyne and its mysterious BULL armor/vehicle.

Purely hypothetical
And now we come to the jump-to-conclusions portion of today's column (obscure Office Space reference for you cubicle dwellers out there). If the military has indeed decided upon its favored builders of MRAPs, firms that lost out in the initial round may feel more inclined to buy back into this contest with an acquisition. General Dynamics and BAE are both too large for their rivals to comfortably swallow. But I wouldn't be entirely shocked if an early-round loser like Textron (NYSE: TXT) or Oshkosh decided to make a bid for bite-sized Force Protection or slightly larger Navistar.

The price would have to be right, of course. And it seems to me that Force would fit more logically into Textron's portfolio, Navistar into Oshkosh's. Either way, though, if the also-rans are to get back into the running for MRAP contracts, this would now appear to be their only option. Call me a Fool, but I think even the possibility of a buyout makes Force Protection more valuable today than it was before it "lost" first place to Navistar yesterday.

[kyron7htx]

Wir sehen uns bei 15$ oder

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.090.419 von kyron7htx am 19.10.07 22:01:48

könnte sein aber ich denke bei 18 usd sollte es auch schluss sein!!

naja aber bei force alles möglich!!!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

wie immer, Freitag ist ein guter Tag.

[Boersenkrieger]

also ich verstehe das nicht hätte eigentlich mit nem deutlichen plus heute gerechnet.... die aktie versteh ich immer weniger also rühr ich sie nicht mehr an und lasse sie da wo sie ist -> in meinem depot

[meier1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.091.118 von Boersenkrieger am 19.10.07 23:28:03

Liegt vielleicht auch daran,daß Dow und Nasdaq heute um jeweils 2.65% abgeschmiert sind??

[mc-plop]

Heute sind +10% aber ein muss nach dem irrationalem handel am freitag, alle call optionsscheine bis 20 $ wurden ausgeknockt, die herausgeber haben etliche millionen verdient aber nun kann der kurs seinen stetigen anstieg bis 30 $ beginnen damit wir dann anfang dezember ne ordentlich startbasis haben um mit dem 1 billion $ Auftrag über mindestens 2200 Stück bis Ende des Jahres oberhalb der 40 $ Marke zu schließen.
Es sei denn wir werden vorher übernommen...

[DollarPenny]

kann erstmal zwischen 13€ und 16€ hin und her pendeln. Bei 13€ wird nachgelegt und bei >16€ laufen lassen.

[mc-plop]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.105.876 von DollarPenny am 22.10.07 12:41:27

gibt keinen grund zum pendeln - ende der woche kurs > 25$

[pagitz01]

zuerst gilt einmal das gap bei 18,50 usd zu schliessen!!!

dann sehen wir weiter!!!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

habt ihr noch nicht gemerkt, daß ihr mit eurem Zahlenraten noch nie Glück hattet?

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.107.212 von wohinistmeinGeld am 22.10.07 14:22:42

und wann hattest du das letzte mal richtig glück

[pagitz01]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.107.587 von pagitz01 am 22.10.07 14:51:00

They will be built by Force Dynamics LLC, a joint venture between Force Protection and a division of General Dynamics Corp.


also die hälfte der kohle geht an GD!!!!

ein grund mehr um das gap bei 18,50 zu schliessen!!!

[pagitz01]

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/071022/nem077.html?.v=22

so wie ich sage die hälfte geht an gd!!!!

also brauchen wir noch ein paar fette aufträge um denn kurs richtig zu beflügeln!!!

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.104.427 von mc-plop am 22.10.07 10:37:23

hast recht, es sind sicher nochmal 10 % drin, -.

[wohinistmeinGeld]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.107.587 von pagitz01 am 22.10.07 14:51:00

seit ich in Force investiert bin nicht mehr.