Wann platzt die TESLA-Blase (Seite 3499)

[xwin]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.055.059 von Sommernacht_2 am 08.03.22 23:53:42

Zitat von Sommernacht_2: Hier hat der Pinto nur gecrasht und die Situation verursacht, in der der absichernde Arbeiter danach von einem BMW tödlich verletzt wurde. Das ganz ist schlimm und tragisch, aber bitte seriös und vollständig berichten.

... was using the Autopilot feature at the time the car crashed ...

Vielleicht ist der Autopilot ja nicht 10x sicherer als ein menschlicher Fahrer ...

Wer ist hier unseriös ? Elon oder ich ?

[Sommernacht_2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.054.267 von xwin am 08.03.22 21:48:54

Hier hat der Pinto nur gecrasht und die Situation verursacht, in der der absichernde Arbeiter danach von einem BMW tödlich verletzt wurde. Das ganz ist schlimm und tragisch, aber bitte seriös und vollständig berichten.

[smallstick]

damit haben sich 2 Trottel schon mal selbst geoutet!🙈

[smallstick]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.053.976 von Wegecke am 08.03.22 21:18:03

jo, nicht lesen können, und bei jeder Dummheit noch einen draufsetzen...😜

[smallstick]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.053.964 von Superworld am 08.03.22 21:15:41

Du der absolut peinliche Volltrottel.
Je nach Definition werden auch Plug-In-Hybrid-Pkw als Elektroautos gezählt, ihr Bestand belief sich am 1. Oktober 2021 auf etwa 494.000. Insgesamt nähert sich die Zahl der elektrisch angetriebenen Pkw damit der Marke von einer Million.

aktuell 84 Tsd. reine Elektroautos in Deutschland.

und wenn die Hybride, die die Reichen mit der 0,05 % Versteuerung sowieso nie laden, und einen Liter mehr brauchen, als reine E-Autos zählst, bist Du der absolute Obervolltrottel.

[mick11]

Wird Musk ein Held der Ukraine?

Neue Starlinksysteme ausgeliefert, auch an den Bürgermeister von Kiew, Vitali Klitschko und seinen Bruder .

Und Musk und Selenskyj haben sogar telefoniert.

https://www.rnd.de/politik/krieg-in-der-ukraine-klitschkos-…

[Boblovin]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.054.447 von Boblovin am 08.03.22 22:08:24

Zitat von Boblovin: I, Elon R. Musk, declare as follows:
1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”).
2. On August 7, 2018, I learned that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or
“Commission”) intended to investigate a Twitter communication I made on the same day.
3. My August 7, 2018 tweet was written at a time when I was in fact considering taking
Tesla private at $420 a share, funding was secured, and there was investor support. See Exhibit
A at 1 (Defs.’ Opp’n. to Pl.’s Mot. for Partial Summ. J., In re Tesla, Inc. Securities Litig., No.
3:18-cv-04865-EMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2022)).
4. Despite this, the SEC’s unrelenting regulatory pressure, combined with the attendant
collateral consequence of the SEC’s complaint against me, caused a scenario in which I was
forced to sign the consent decree in 2018. Tesla was a less mature company and the SEC’s
action stood to jeopardize the company’s financing. Defending against the SEC’s action through

protracted litigation was not in the interests of the company and its shareholders. As Tesla’s
CEO and Chairman at the time, I perceived that the company and its shareholders would be
placed at undue risk unless I settled the matter promptly.
5. In September 2018, before filing this action, the SEC offered me a no-admit, no-deny
monetary settlement with no officer or director bar. Moments before proceeding with this
settlement, on September 26, I learned for the first time that the settlement could require multiple
companies I was affiliated with—Tesla, SpaceX, The Boring Company, and Neuralink—to
either seek a publicly accessible waiver letter regarding the SEC’s allegations or risk their future
ability to raise money through Regulation D offerings.
6. Upon receipt of this information, I was adamant that we needed to withdraw from SEC
negotiations. I had only wanted to settle to help Tesla, but I did not wish to cause harm to the
other companies. It felt wrong to do so.
7. On September 27, my counsel informed the SEC that I had withdrawn my consent to
move forward with the settlement. The Commission filed their complaint against me in this case
the same day.
8. The potential harms of the SEC’s action to Tesla and its shareholders were immediately
apparent. On September 28, I learned from Tesla’s Investor Relations team that several of
Tesla’s largest shareholders could cede their ownership in Tesla—substantially impacting
Tesla’s financing—if the case was not settled expediently. I entered into the consent decree for
the immediate survival of Tesla.
9. I never lied to shareholders. I would never lie to shareholders. I entered into the consent
decree for the survival of Tesla, for the sake of its shareholders.


So eine Witzfigur. Das ist der letzte Brief an dem Richter wegen der Untersuchung der SEC

Quelle vergessen

https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/3ciodapq4/new-york-souther…

[Boblovin]

I, Elon R. Musk, declare as follows:
1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”).
2. On August 7, 2018, I learned that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or
“Commission”) intended to investigate a Twitter communication I made on the same day.
3. My August 7, 2018 tweet was written at a time when I was in fact considering taking
Tesla private at $420 a share, funding was secured, and there was investor support. See Exhibit
A at 1 (Defs.’ Opp’n. to Pl.’s Mot. for Partial Summ. J., In re Tesla, Inc. Securities Litig., No.
3:18-cv-04865-EMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2022)).
4. Despite this, the SEC’s unrelenting regulatory pressure, combined with the attendant
collateral consequence of the SEC’s complaint against me, caused a scenario in which I was
forced to sign the consent decree in 2018. Tesla was a less mature company and the SEC’s
action stood to jeopardize the company’s financing. Defending against the SEC’s action through

protracted litigation was not in the interests of the company and its shareholders. As Tesla’s
CEO and Chairman at the time, I perceived that the company and its shareholders would be
placed at undue risk unless I settled the matter promptly.
5. In September 2018, before filing this action, the SEC offered me a no-admit, no-deny
monetary settlement with no officer or director bar. Moments before proceeding with this
settlement, on September 26, I learned for the first time that the settlement could require multiple
companies I was affiliated with—Tesla, SpaceX, The Boring Company, and Neuralink—to
either seek a publicly accessible waiver letter regarding the SEC’s allegations or risk their future
ability to raise money through Regulation D offerings.
6. Upon receipt of this information, I was adamant that we needed to withdraw from SEC
negotiations. I had only wanted to settle to help Tesla, but I did not wish to cause harm to the
other companies. It felt wrong to do so.
7. On September 27, my counsel informed the SEC that I had withdrawn my consent to
move forward with the settlement. The Commission filed their complaint against me in this case
the same day.
8. The potential harms of the SEC’s action to Tesla and its shareholders were immediately
apparent. On September 28, I learned from Tesla’s Investor Relations team that several of
Tesla’s largest shareholders could cede their ownership in Tesla—substantially impacting
Tesla’s financing—if the case was not settled expediently. I entered into the consent decree for
the immediate survival of Tesla.
9. I never lied to shareholders. I would never lie to shareholders. I entered into the consent
decree for the survival of Tesla, for the sake of its shareholders.


So eine Witzfigur. Das ist der letzte Brief an dem Richter wegen der Untersuchung der SEC

[erwinsklein]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.053.895 von Wegecke am 08.03.22 21:05:29

Wie viel sind denn 1600€ pro kWp ohne MwSt. ….. mit MwSt.? ….. liegen wir da nahe an den ca. 2000 € pro kWp inkl. MwSt.? Oder ganz weit weg davon?
Jetzt bin ich aber wieder gespannt auf deine Rechen Künste! ….. schreibe doch einmal jene Zahl …. 1600€ x 19% WwSt. hier fett rein! 😂😂😂 ….. Das schaffst du nie!

Zitat von Wegecke: Wenn du mal wieder von deiner Pöbeltour runtergekommen bist, lies dir es nochmal in Ruhe durch. Was ist eine Lüge an 2009 4300 € / kWp ?
Kann auch ein Jahr später nehmen (du hast ja 10-12 Jahre gesagt, willst du das bestreiten?). Auch da waren es noch 3500 €. Immer noch mehr als 1600, oder?
Kannst mal hier reinschauen, sind ne Menge Angebote sogar deutlich unter 1600 dabei.
https://www.photovoltaikforum.com/board/41-angebote/

[Boblovin]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.054.078 von Wegecke am 08.03.22 21:27:38

Zitat von Wegecke: Keine Einkäufer für Batteriemetalle. Leg mir nichts in den Mund was ich nicht gesagt hab.

Und auch das konnte ich in 10 Sekunden Google Suche widerlegen 🙄