Wann und wie kommt der nächste Crash? (Seite 62)
eröffnet am 15.07.14 10:19:59 von
neuester Beitrag 23.01.24 14:11:46 von
neuester Beitrag 23.01.24 14:11:46 von
Beiträge: 1.339
ID: 1.196.416
ID: 1.196.416
Aufrufe heute: 1
Gesamt: 180.021
Gesamt: 180.021
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
| Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
|---|---|---|
| 28.07.14, 14:17 | 49 | |
| gestern 21:44 | 42 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 38 | |
| gestern 20:13 | 32 | |
| gestern 22:19 | 30 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 30 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 29 | |
| gestern 23:24 | 25 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
| Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 1. | 18.742,00 | +0,14 | 105 | |||
| 2. | 2. | 2.427,11 | +0,07 | 48 | |||
| 3. | 3. | 174,80 | -1,50 | 38 | |||
| 4. | 4. | 31,83 | +1,01 | 37 | |||
| 5. | 5. | 6,4830 | -0,86 | 33 | |||
| 6. | 7. | 14,700 | +12,99 | 25 | |||
| 7. | 6. | 16,900 | +0,90 | 23 | |||
| 8. | 8. | 28,74 | +0,47 | 17 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.411.269 von faultcode am 13.01.21 02:46:51"We could get to 2% on the 10-year by the end of this year, maybe even higher...I think there's going to be inflation," says Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel on interest rates. "You don't want to be in cash, especially long term bonds."
https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1348981253589098498
Jeremy Siegel:
https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1348981253589098498
Jeremy Siegel:
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.170.434 von faultcode am 23.12.20 00:43:00GEX "auf 180" -- USD22.47Mrd. und damit neuer Positiv-Rekord 
außer vor der unsicheren US-Wahl sieht das nicht nach demnächst fallenden Kursen aus (mMn):
außer vor der unsicheren US-Wahl sieht das nicht nach demnächst fallenden Kursen aus (mMn):
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 65.782.188 von faultcode am 20.11.20 12:47:46Last Updated: Jan. 8, 2021 at 12:08 p.m. ET
...
The Federal Reserve’s monthly purchases of U.S. Treasurys and mortgage-backed bonds, designed to help the economy recover from the coronavirus pandemic and maintain financial market liquidity, should continue at the same $120 billion-per-month pace all year, said Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida on Friday.
“I think its well down the road when it will be appropriate to begin to slow the pace of the increase in our balance sheet,” Clarida said during a discussion with the Council on Foreign Relations.
“It could be quite some time before we would think about tapering.”
...
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/feds-clarida-backs-maintai…
...
The Federal Reserve’s monthly purchases of U.S. Treasurys and mortgage-backed bonds, designed to help the economy recover from the coronavirus pandemic and maintain financial market liquidity, should continue at the same $120 billion-per-month pace all year, said Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida on Friday.
“I think its well down the road when it will be appropriate to begin to slow the pace of the increase in our balance sheet,” Clarida said during a discussion with the Council on Foreign Relations.
“It could be quite some time before we would think about tapering.”
...
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/feds-clarida-backs-maintai…
Trading Spotlight
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.319.016 von faultcode am 06.01.21 23:19:47z.Z. überschlagen sich die Upgrades. Fast egal was, Elektro, O&G, US-Banken, ...
Seltsam, oder nicht so seltsam, so kurz vor den Earnings ab nächster Woche
https://twitter.com/eWhispers/status/1346101401567563776
<das sind nur bestätigte Termine>
Seltsam, oder nicht so seltsam, so kurz vor den Earnings ab nächster Woche
https://twitter.com/eWhispers/status/1346101401567563776
<das sind nur bestätigte Termine>
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.306.794 von faultcode am 06.01.21 11:59:47
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.282.047 von faultcode am 04.01.21 18:44:49Warnock projected to win Georgia Senate race, as Ossoff clings to slim lead
Last Updated: Jan. 6, 2021 at 2:56 a.m. ET
First Published: Jan. 5, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. ET
Democrats on verge of controlling Senate; Ossoff’s campaign says it fully expects him to win
...
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-polls-close-in-georgia-…
Last Updated: Jan. 6, 2021 at 2:56 a.m. ET
First Published: Jan. 5, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. ET
Democrats on verge of controlling Senate; Ossoff’s campaign says it fully expects him to win
...
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-polls-close-in-georgia-…
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 66.170.434 von faultcode am 23.12.20 00:43:00
Trump ist zwar outgoing, aber auch das hat was mMn damit zu tun. Europa lief heute bis dahin ja recht gut:
The audio of Trump with the Georgia secretary of state. Wow. It’s like telling the Nixon tapes to “hold my beer.”
https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1345834047503646722
Zitat von faultcode: GEX -- wenn es regnet, wird es schütten:...
Trump ist zwar outgoing, aber auch das hat was mMn damit zu tun. Europa lief heute bis dahin ja recht gut:
The audio of Trump with the Georgia secretary of state. Wow. It’s like telling the Nixon tapes to “hold my beer.”
https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1345834047503646722
1999/2000
...
https://twitter.com/corry_wang/status/1345192546297933824
<ein ganzer Thread>
...
Every document hereon comes from my former employer Bernstein Research's internal research archive, which extend back to 1994
...
In truth, the hard part about the tech bubble wasn't noticing it. The hard part was timing it
Our equity strategist tried in January 99... he was off by 14 months (and another 30 point gap in value vs growth)
...
Nobody knew the bubble popped until months after it did
Nobody noticed in March 2000 when it finally popped. Our equity strategist (who bet his career on it!) didn't catch on until June
...
Fundamentals follow price, not vice versa
The bubble popped in Q1 2000. Fundamentals didn't decelerate until Q4 2000.
It was reflexivity at work. Lower stock prices = less capex spend = less revenue growth = lower stock prices. A vicious cycle
...
(FC: Format)
...
https://twitter.com/corry_wang/status/1345192546297933824
<ein ganzer Thread>
...
Every document hereon comes from my former employer Bernstein Research's internal research archive, which extend back to 1994
...
In truth, the hard part about the tech bubble wasn't noticing it. The hard part was timing it
Our equity strategist tried in January 99... he was off by 14 months (and another 30 point gap in value vs growth)
...
Nobody knew the bubble popped until months after it did
Nobody noticed in March 2000 when it finally popped. Our equity strategist (who bet his career on it!) didn't catch on until June
...
Fundamentals follow price, not vice versa
The bubble popped in Q1 2000. Fundamentals didn't decelerate until Q4 2000.
It was reflexivity at work. Lower stock prices = less capex spend = less revenue growth = lower stock prices. A vicious cycle
...
(FC: Format)
Durchsuchen
