Northern Dynasty -- 100-Bagger-Aktie....10 000 Prozent Gewinn...Rick Rule (Seite 129)

[price-of-success]

Immer wieder kommt von irgendwo irgendentetwas
Irre
ACOE is in charge
Period

[MCDMN]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.722.730 von The_sledge am 11.08.20 16:23:50

https://www.ktuu.com/2020/08/12/house-oversight-committee-re…

[The_sledge]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS – ALASKA DISTRICT
P.O. Box 6898, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, AK 99506-0898
http://www.poa.usace.army.milhttp://www.facebook.com/AlaskaCorps
http://www.flickr.com/AlaskaCorpshttp://www.youtube.com/Ala…
http://www.twitter.com/AlaskaCorps
Corps releases Pebble final environmental impact statement
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON – The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Alaska
District published the final environmental impact statement for the Pebble Limited Partnership’s
application to discharge fill material into waters of the United States for the purpose of
developing a copper-molybdenum-gold mine project in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska.

The final EIS is not a permit decision and does not authorize operation of the mine. The Corps
is making a permit decision under two authorities – Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act; neither of these authorities permit the
mine plan of operation. A record of decision will be written identifying the Corps’ final permit
decision no sooner than 30 days from the date of this notice.

As of today, the document is available electronically at the Pebble Project EIS website:
http://www.pebbleprojecteis.com. Also, the final EIS may be viewed electronically at the
following public libraries: Alaska Resources Library and Information Service; Bristol Bay
Borough Libraries serving King Salmon, Naknek, and South Naknek; Dillingham Public Library;
Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.; Homer Public Library; Kenai Community Library;
Soldotna Public Library; UAA/APU Consortium Library and Z.J. Loussac Public Library in
Anchorage.
To learn more about the Corps’ Regulatory Division and its program, visit
http://www.poa.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/.
# # #
NEWS RELEASE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG ®
For Immediate Release:
July 24, 2020
Release No. 20-015
Contact:
John Budnik, 907-753-2615
[e-mail]

Wie hier zu lesen von der offiziellen Seite der US-Behörde ist der Permit noch keine Erlaubnis zu fördern. Es stehen noch
mehrere "Permits" aus. Demnächst wird im ROD dokumentiert, NDM durchgesunken wird, Auflagen erhält oder ausgebremst wird. M.E. wird Donald im Endeffekt die Sache durchwinken.
Letzten Endes gewinnt doch immer die Wirtschaft gegen die Umwelt. Deshalb mein Rat, Anteile festhalten.
Euer Sledgy

[SPORTIFY]

Strong buy, they will produce...question of time, patience.Patience the small difference to be a winner

[schokie]

Gut das die meisten bescheid wissen, wessen geistes Kind Biden ist....Kurs ist nicht eingebrochen nach seinem gestammel
Gratulation an die, die für 1,22 € eingesammelt haben

[TomPeters0n]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.706.344 von MCDMN am 10.08.20 14:55:40

Genau so ein Dekret meine ich

[MCDMN]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.705.993 von TomPeters0n am 10.08.20 14:29:04

Ein Dekret zum schnellen Durchwinken einer Mine um in ca. 3 bis 4 Jahren auf wichtige Rohstoffe zugreifen zu können? Damit Corona Hilfen mit Gold gedeckt werden können und somit Pebble teils verstaatlicht wird? Bzw das Elon genug US Kupfer bekommt für Tesla Batterien und die US Army genug Raketentriebwerke mit Rhenium bauen kann? Früher oder später wird die Menschheit an Pebble drangehen aber wer und wann?

[TomPeters0n]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.705.894 von geo80 am 10.08.20 14:19:37

dazu könnte allerdings auch das ein oder andere Decret (EO) gehören, welches uns in die Karten spielen könnte, oder?

... just sayin...

[The_sledge]

Northern Dynasty: Final EIS and Record of Decision will determine federal action at Alaska’s Pebble Project
August 10, 2020 Vancouver – Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (TSX: NDM; NYSE American: NAK) ("Northern Dynasty" or the "Company") reports that its 100%-owned US-based subsidiary Pebble Limited Partnership (“Pebble Partnership”) issued a public statement in response to comments made by US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. The statement reads:

“Pebble Partnership CEO Tom Collier said today the Final Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for the Pebble Project released by the US Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) last month, and the federal Record of Decision (“ROD”) expected within weeks, will serve as the basis for final federal decision-making at the proposed copper-gold-molybdenum project.

“Collier was responding to a statement issued Sunday by Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden, in which the former Vice President suggests he would rely on a study completed by the Obama-era Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in 2014 to deny federal permits to Pebble. Collier stressed the Final EIS released by the USACE on July 24, 2020 will ‘without any doubt whatsoever’ serve as the administrative record for all federal regulatory and permitting decisions at Pebble.

“’It’s election season, and people are going to posture and say things, I totally understand that,’ Collier said. ‘But when it comes down to brass tacks, to the law, there can be no federal action at Pebble that is inconsistent with the Final EIS, period.’

“Collier pointed out that prior efforts by the Obama administration to impose regulatory decisions at Pebble in the absence of an EIS or other legally defensible administrative record were stopped by the courts. He said any similar action by a future Democratic administration would be promptly overturned – particularly given the favorable findings of the Pebble EIS.

“’Look, any suggestion that the Obama-era Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment (“BBWA”) is a more defensible administrative record for regulatory decision-making at Pebble than the Final EIS is laughable,’ he said.

“’Not only does the BBWA not even assess our project, it doesn’t consider project-specific mitigation, it’s based almost entirely on secondary research, and it isn’t an impact assessment. As a basis for regulatory decision-making, the BBWA is woefully inadequate and demonstrably inferior to the Final EIS, and I’m 100% certain that our federal courts will take the same view if they are asked.’

“Collier stressed the Final EIS demonstrates that Pebble will have no measurable impact on Bristol Bay salmon or other fish populations, nor on the commercial, subsistence and sport fisheries they support.

“’The science is in,’ he said. ‘After 2½ years of study by the USACE, the US EPA and nine other federal, state and local regulatory agencies, it has been determined the Pebble Project will fully co-exist with clean water and healthy fish and wildlife populations in Bristol Bay. No amount of Monday morning quarterbacking is going to change those findings.’

“The Pebble deposit is on State of Alaska lands acquired as part of a land swap with the federal government in the 1970s, and is specifically designated for mineral exploration and development. With the Final EIS complete and a ROD pending, Collier said the window for federal decision-making at Pebble is closing. It will be up to the State administration and regulatory agencies to make final permitting decisions, he said.

“’This project is on state lands acquired specifically for the purpose of mineral development,” Collier said. ‘For any federal administration to appropriate such lands after the fact is a taking prohibited by the US Constitution, not to mention a gross violation of state rights.’

“Collier said any action by a Democratic administration to challenge Pebble’s federal permits once granted would have severe negative implications for the United States’ reputation as a jurisdiction for business investment, even if such an action was subsequently overturned by the courts. Investors willing to commit up to $1 billion or more to develop projects in the US, as Pebble has done, expect federal leaders to abide by the ‘rule of law’.

“Rather than suggesting a willingness to overturn duly permitted and authorized projects, Collier said candidate Biden would be well served to tell Americans how the US can develop domestic sources of copper and other strategic minerals necessary to transition to a lower carbon future.

“’Are we going to continue to rely on 3rd world countries, where environmental laws are lax and human rights are a pale shadow of the standards we enforce in the United States?’ he asked. ‘Are we going to count on China to meet our material needs to combat climate change and advance America’s green economy of the future?

“’Or are we going to finally acknowledge that the US can develop its natural resources more safely, responsibly and sustainably than any other country in the world?’”

About Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Northern Dynasty is a mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver, Canada. Northern Dynasty's principal asset, owned through its wholly owned Alaska-based U.S. subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership (“PLP”), is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of 2,402 mineral claims in southwest Alaska, including the Pebble deposit. PLP is the proponent of the Pebble Project, an initiative to develop one of the world's most important mineral resources.

For further details on Northern Dynasty and the Pebble Project, please visit the Company's website at www.northerndynastyminerals.com or contact Investor services at [phone] or within North America at 1-800-667-2114. Review Canadian public filings at www.sedar.com and US public filings at www.sec.gov.

Ronald W. Thiessen
President & CEO

US Media Contact:

Neuster Newsletter

Sledgy

[geo80]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.705.630 von schokie am 10.08.20 14:00:49

Zitat von schokie: Natürlich wird hier nx verkauft, erst das ROD abwrten, danach schauen wir mal wieter

Dafür sind noch 3 Monate Zeit. Ich schätze, wenn der ROD nach 2 Monaten immer noch nicht da ist, werden immer mehr in Panik verkaufen.

Deadline ist nicht der Januar, sollte Trump nicht wiedergewählt werden, sondern Tag der Wahl. Eine Niederlage für den Narzissten Trump hätte nämlich zur Folge, dass er nach der Wahl gar nichts mehr tun würde, außer noch mehr Schaden anrichten, um seinen Nachfolger zu schaden.