OT - Internet retailers face tough times - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 02.03.00 19:59:47 von
neuester Beitrag 02.03.00 20:16:32 von
neuester Beitrag 02.03.00 20:16:32 von
Beiträge: 2
ID: 85.854
ID: 85.854
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 126
Gesamt: 126
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US0231351067 · WKN: 906866 · Symbol: AMZ
169,50
EUR
+0,15 %
+0,26 EUR
Letzter Kurs 17:18:02 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
TitelBeiträge |
---|
10:30 Uhr · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
Amazon Aktien ab 5,80 Euro handeln - Ohne versteckte Kosten!Anzeige |
16:03 Uhr · Der Aktionär TV |
14:04 Uhr · dpa-AFX |
Werte aus der Branche Einzelhandel
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
0,8777 | +2.358,54 | |
1.080,00 | +50,00 | |
6,2400 | +39,91 | |
0,9750 | +22,64 | |
6,0500 | +21,49 |
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
9,4500 | -11,68 | |
0,8901 | -11,87 | |
17,000 | -15,00 | |
2,5570 | -16,80 | |
0,5600 | -45,10 |
Internet retailers face tough times
By Andrea Orr
PALO ALTO, Calif., March 2 (Reuters) - It was barely a year ago that investors could not get enough of Internet retail stocks, and new online stores that
mimicked Amazon.com <AMZN.O> were appearing on a daily basis.
While few people expected that level of euphoria to last, the industry is, nonetheless, alarmed by how swiftly and severely fortunes have reversed.
"E-tailing" has become something of a dirty word among even the most enthusiastic Internet investors, with many venture capitalists say they will back anything but
an Internet store.
Most of the e-tailing stocks that have recently gone public -- like Pets.com Inc. <IPET.O>, Buy.com Inc. <BUYX.O> and VarsityBooks Inc. <VSTY.O> -- are
trading near or below their IPO prices. Shares of the online pet supply store Pets.com, for instance, hover around $7 a share -- more than 30 percent below the
$11 a share where it debuted less than a month ago.
NO PROFITS
Even more stunning is that some of the e-tailing pioneers -- including Drugstore.com Inc. <DSCM.O>, eToys Inc. <ETYS.O> and the software store Beyond.com
Corp.<BYND.O> -- are trading at a fraction of their highs for the year. Some are running out of cash and retooling to focus less on retailing, which increasingly is
seen as a questionable business.
For all the double-digit, single-day gains that initially made these Internet retailing stocks famous, it seems that their subsequent drops to the downside were almost
as large.
Abhishek Gami, an analyst with William Blair in Chicago, says the 48 e-commerce stocks his firm tracks have risen an average of just 7.8 percent since June of
1996.
"They`ve way underperformed the overall market," he says.
Bob Walberg, with Briefing.com in Chicago, says "investors are finally beginning to question these business models."
Analysts are hard-pressed to find a single pure-play online retailer has turned a profit to date.
While the famously unprofitable Amazon.com continues to win some support for its strategy of delaying profits in order to build its operation, investors are not so
willing to make this leap of faith for lesser online retailers that do not have nearly the customer base or brand recognition of Amazon.
The question now being posed to most e-tailers is not when, but if, they will ever make money.
WHAT WENT WRONG?
How did a business that seemed to define the booming tech-driven economy, find itself in so much trouble?
Many critics now say there was a gross miscalculation built into the assumption that retailers could slash overhead costs merely by doing away with the lumbering
"brick-and-mortar" stores and setting up virtual shops online.
"There are a lot of parts you need to build before you can make money online," Gami notes. "Amazon is spending billions of dollars to build out its distribution
facilities.
"I still think (Internet retailing) will be huge ... but the key point is that you really don`t make a lot more online than offline. E-tailers don`t have stores, but they still
have to build warehouses and infrastructure, and they still have to hire people to deal with returns."
Not all e-tailers think their expenses will rise as high as they are for their offline counterparts, but most now admit there are costs that were overlooked initially. In an
industry packed with like-sounding businesses, hefty spending on advertising has been imperative to building a strong brand.
Even Amazon found it needed to increase advertising spending beyond what was planned for the last holiday season to spread the word that it was no longer just a
book retailer. And many smaller online merchants spent upwards of $3 million for a 30-second slot during the Super Bowl in January.
If these companies thought they could build a brand with a few well-placed ads, it now appears aggressive marketing will have to be a big part of their business
plans going forward. Aside from Amazon, there are not many strong e-tail brands, industry analysts agree -- except for the online auction site eBay Inc.
<EBAY.O> and Priceline.com Inc.<PCLN.O>, which lets consumers set their prices for a range of goods from airline tickets to gasoline.
MASS CONFUSION
Most consumers still do not know the difference between a Cyberian Outpost and a CyberStores.com, or Pets.com and Petstore.com. So now, on top of
exorbitant ad spending, many of these stores are trying to attract customers by slashing margins to razor thin or nonexistent levels.
In the midst of so much confusion, one thing that appears to be certain, is the continued growth in overall e-tailing sales. Forrester Research projects online retail
sales will grow to $184.5 billion in 2004 from $20.3 billion in 1999.
Yet some retailers appear less willing to bet on even a modest slice of that pie. Online drug store PlanetRx.com Inc <PLRX.O>, for example, recently said it
expected to derive 15 percent of its future annual revenues from corporate sponsorships, often with drug companies that will sponsor disease-specific areas on the
site.
Newly public VarsityBooks, which last year was touting the profit potential of selling text books to college students, now says it is supplementing that business with
other, non-retail, revenue streams. The plan is to use its on-campus presence to do direct marketing for other businesses.
"In contrast to e-tailing," direct marketing "has a significantly higher profit margin, which is an important element of our strategy going forward," says VarsityBooks
Vice President Jonathan Kaplan.
By Andrea Orr
PALO ALTO, Calif., March 2 (Reuters) - It was barely a year ago that investors could not get enough of Internet retail stocks, and new online stores that
mimicked Amazon.com <AMZN.O> were appearing on a daily basis.
While few people expected that level of euphoria to last, the industry is, nonetheless, alarmed by how swiftly and severely fortunes have reversed.
"E-tailing" has become something of a dirty word among even the most enthusiastic Internet investors, with many venture capitalists say they will back anything but
an Internet store.
Most of the e-tailing stocks that have recently gone public -- like Pets.com Inc. <IPET.O>, Buy.com Inc. <BUYX.O> and VarsityBooks Inc. <VSTY.O> -- are
trading near or below their IPO prices. Shares of the online pet supply store Pets.com, for instance, hover around $7 a share -- more than 30 percent below the
$11 a share where it debuted less than a month ago.
NO PROFITS
Even more stunning is that some of the e-tailing pioneers -- including Drugstore.com Inc. <DSCM.O>, eToys Inc. <ETYS.O> and the software store Beyond.com
Corp.<BYND.O> -- are trading at a fraction of their highs for the year. Some are running out of cash and retooling to focus less on retailing, which increasingly is
seen as a questionable business.
For all the double-digit, single-day gains that initially made these Internet retailing stocks famous, it seems that their subsequent drops to the downside were almost
as large.
Abhishek Gami, an analyst with William Blair in Chicago, says the 48 e-commerce stocks his firm tracks have risen an average of just 7.8 percent since June of
1996.
"They`ve way underperformed the overall market," he says.
Bob Walberg, with Briefing.com in Chicago, says "investors are finally beginning to question these business models."
Analysts are hard-pressed to find a single pure-play online retailer has turned a profit to date.
While the famously unprofitable Amazon.com continues to win some support for its strategy of delaying profits in order to build its operation, investors are not so
willing to make this leap of faith for lesser online retailers that do not have nearly the customer base or brand recognition of Amazon.
The question now being posed to most e-tailers is not when, but if, they will ever make money.
WHAT WENT WRONG?
How did a business that seemed to define the booming tech-driven economy, find itself in so much trouble?
Many critics now say there was a gross miscalculation built into the assumption that retailers could slash overhead costs merely by doing away with the lumbering
"brick-and-mortar" stores and setting up virtual shops online.
"There are a lot of parts you need to build before you can make money online," Gami notes. "Amazon is spending billions of dollars to build out its distribution
facilities.
"I still think (Internet retailing) will be huge ... but the key point is that you really don`t make a lot more online than offline. E-tailers don`t have stores, but they still
have to build warehouses and infrastructure, and they still have to hire people to deal with returns."
Not all e-tailers think their expenses will rise as high as they are for their offline counterparts, but most now admit there are costs that were overlooked initially. In an
industry packed with like-sounding businesses, hefty spending on advertising has been imperative to building a strong brand.
Even Amazon found it needed to increase advertising spending beyond what was planned for the last holiday season to spread the word that it was no longer just a
book retailer. And many smaller online merchants spent upwards of $3 million for a 30-second slot during the Super Bowl in January.
If these companies thought they could build a brand with a few well-placed ads, it now appears aggressive marketing will have to be a big part of their business
plans going forward. Aside from Amazon, there are not many strong e-tail brands, industry analysts agree -- except for the online auction site eBay Inc.
<EBAY.O> and Priceline.com Inc.<PCLN.O>, which lets consumers set their prices for a range of goods from airline tickets to gasoline.
MASS CONFUSION
Most consumers still do not know the difference between a Cyberian Outpost and a CyberStores.com, or Pets.com and Petstore.com. So now, on top of
exorbitant ad spending, many of these stores are trying to attract customers by slashing margins to razor thin or nonexistent levels.
In the midst of so much confusion, one thing that appears to be certain, is the continued growth in overall e-tailing sales. Forrester Research projects online retail
sales will grow to $184.5 billion in 2004 from $20.3 billion in 1999.
Yet some retailers appear less willing to bet on even a modest slice of that pie. Online drug store PlanetRx.com Inc <PLRX.O>, for example, recently said it
expected to derive 15 percent of its future annual revenues from corporate sponsorships, often with drug companies that will sponsor disease-specific areas on the
site.
Newly public VarsityBooks, which last year was touting the profit potential of selling text books to college students, now says it is supplementing that business with
other, non-retail, revenue streams. The plan is to use its on-campus presence to do direct marketing for other businesses.
"In contrast to e-tailing," direct marketing "has a significantly higher profit margin, which is an important element of our strategy going forward," says VarsityBooks
Vice President Jonathan Kaplan.
Auf Basis meines heutigen Wissens, gehe ich davon aus,
daß Amazon.com eine gloreiche Zukunft vor sich hat.
Ungeachtet der aktuellen, kurz- und mittelfristigen
Kurssituation glaube ich an einen herrausragenden
langfristigen Erfolg dieses Unternehmens.
mfg
investor_007
daß Amazon.com eine gloreiche Zukunft vor sich hat.
Ungeachtet der aktuellen, kurz- und mittelfristigen
Kurssituation glaube ich an einen herrausragenden
langfristigen Erfolg dieses Unternehmens.
mfg
investor_007
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Investoren beobachten auch:
Wertpapier | Perf. % |
---|---|
-0,79 | |
-1,21 | |
-0,27 | |
+0,08 | |
+9,29 | |
+0,91 | |
-1,72 | |
-0,06 | |
-2,09 | |
-0,19 |
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
99 | ||
57 | ||
45 | ||
45 | ||
42 | ||
40 | ||
39 | ||
35 | ||
33 | ||
31 |
16:03 Uhr · Der Aktionär TV · Amazon |
14:04 Uhr · dpa-AFX · Amazon |
10:30 Uhr · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Amazon |
07:48 Uhr · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Amazon |
07:29 Uhr · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Amazon |
22.05.24 · dpa-AFX · Amazon |
22.05.24 · dpa-AFX · Amazon |
22.05.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion · Amazon |
21.05.24 · wO Newsflash · Amazon |
21.05.24 · dpa-AFX · Advanced Micro Devices |
Zeit | Titel |
---|---|
16:38 Uhr | |
01.05.24 | |
01.05.24 | |
30.12.23 | |
25.12.23 | |
27.09.23 |