§§§ Habe da etwas ausgegraben €€€ - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[MCGabriel]

NNOS WKN= A0BLVV

Da steckt ne Menge Phantasie hinter. Habe gestern mal ne erste Position aufgebaut

Und warum - ganz einfach. Der MM NITE ist mit ca. der doppelten Anzahl an Shares short in diesem Wert

NanoSignal Stockholder Sues Major Wall Street Institutions for ``Counterfeiting`` Shares



LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 31, 2004--A lawsuit filed in Las Vegas County Court today by a major stockholder in NanoSignal Corporation (OTC:NNOS) alleges that a group of major Wall Street institutions has systematically damaged the market for the stock of NNOS and many other companies by flooding the market with fraudulently manufactured, virtually counterfeit shares.

By mis-using its "Stock Borrow Program" for the personal profit of its members, rather than the purposes for which it was originally established in 1981, New York`s Depository Trust Company (DTC) has created artificial shares in NNOS and other publicly-traded companies, the lawsuit (Case No. A491236) filed by Las Vegas resident Gary W. Walters claims.

One defendant in the lawsuit, Jersey City-based stockbroker Knight Trading Group, Inc. is presently "short" 447 million shares of NNOS, Mr. Walters` lawsuit alleges. That`s more than double the number of NNOS legitimately issued and outstanding shares. This is only possible because DTC and its National Securities Clearing Corporation subsidiary (NSCC) have created hundreds of millions of "counterfeit" electronic shares that don`t actually exist, Walters says.

The market value of NanoSignal`s shares has been reduced by these illegal practices, Mr. Walters` lawsuit states, and he seeks to recover his damages from the defendants in this suit. "I believe that investors in many other companies have been hurt by the conduct of these defendants," Mr. Walters states. "I hope that my lawsuit will remind them once again that in all of their activities, the financial institutions that comprise Wall Street must always put the interests of the small investor first. If my suit prevails, Wall Street will have to undergo a major paradigm shift."

Commenting upon the merits of Mr. Walters` lawsuit, NanoSignal`s chairman, Dr. Rupert Perrin, a two-time Nobel Prize nominee, stated that "the conduct of these institutions, abusing their positions of trust to profit from their fraudulently-obtained short positions at the expense of thousands of small investors, is irresponsible and despicable. I expect that this suit will teach them the lesson that they deserve."

NOTE: This press release contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve a number of uncertainties and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently expressed in any such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date of this press release. NanoSignal does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by it or on behalf of NanoSignal. This report has been compiled from information provided by NanoSignal Corporation (NanoSignal" or the "Company"). This report is published solely for information purposes, and is not to be construed as an offer to sell nor the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any state or other jurisdiction. Investment in the securities of the Company should only be considered by persons who are aware of, suited to, and able to bear the risks involved. The Company`s investor relations representative and/or its officers, directors or principal stockholders may, from time to time, have a long or short position in the securities of this Company. The investor relations representative is a paid consultant to the Company. Further information with respect to any matter discussed in this report is available upon request. In compliance with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, NanoSignal notes that the statements contained in this report that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements that are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. NanoSignal wishes to caution readers of this report that these risks and uncertainties may cause NanoSignal`s actual results to differ materially from those that may be implied by any forward-looking statements made it, or on its behalf. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, general economic and business conditions affecting the demand for NanoSignal`s services, competition from existing and future technologies, the possible unavailability of financing on favorable terms, and many other factors.


CONTACT: Princeton Research, Inc. for NanoSignalMr. Mike King, 702-650-3000 (Investor Relations)



NOCH FRAGEN
SOURCE: NanoSignal Corporation

[MCGabriel]

Und der nächste Hammer NNOS will an die AMEX



NanoSignal Corp. Announces the Acquisition of The Haverhill Technology Group and its Operating Subsidiaries



LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 9, 2004--NanoSignal Corp. (OTC:NNOS) is pleased to report that the Board of Directors received notice that their proposal to acquire all the outstanding assets of Haverhill Technology Group and its plants, equipment and operating subsidiaries, The Haverhill Research Institute, Inc., Elatec Technology Corporation, H.K. Equipment, Inc., Dynatech ETC Furnaces Inc., in exchange for restricted NanoSignal stock was accepted by a representative from the Courts adjudicating the disposition of The Haverhill Technology Group.

CEO Scott A. Ervin, stated, "Once all documentation is completed with the Courts, allowing for restructuring the various operating business of Haverhill Technology Group and all of its subsidiaries into wholly owned subsidiaries of NanoSignal Corp, thus making available multiple opportunities to independently operate stand alone companies, while allowing NanoSignal shareholders the opportunity to receive 10% of each restructured company in non delutable shares as a special dividend to current NanoSignal shareholders, each independently expected to operate from this acquisition and through careful restructuring, should allow meaningful revenue from continued operations and position NanoSignal with sufficient qualifications and revenue to apply for a new AMEX exchange listing. Each of the various component operations is independently a can for a spin off are joint venture opportunity from Haverhill Technology Group and in the future should play a significant role in revenue enhancement for NanoSignal shareholders."

About NanoSignal Corp.

NanoSignal Corp. is currently a medical technology company introducing its patented Slices(TM) technology to the MRI industry, allowing radiologists and technologists to perform advanced imaging features beyond the capabilities of the standard MRI computer.

Information about NanoSignal Corp. is available at www.nanosignalcorp.com.

This press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements can be identified by the lead-in "Looking Forward." These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of the effectiveness of management`s strategies and decisions, general economic and business conditions, new or modified statutory or regulatory requirements, and changing price and market conditions. No assurance can be given that these are all the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statement.


CONTACT: Princeton Research, Inc. for NanoSignal Corp.Mike King, 702-650-3000
[e-mail]

SOURCE: NanoSignal Corporation, Inc


Da wird sich NITE schwer strecken müssen Das Ding wird abgehen wie ne Rakete

[MCGabriel]

Zieht Euch die Aktie mal übers WE rein Könnte wirklich zur Gelddruckmaschine werden in den nächsten Wochen

[MCGabriel]

Ach ja hier der Chart. Man kann deutlich das zunehmende Kaufinteresse verfolgen. Was aber passiert, wenn sich NITE anfängt einzudecken und die ganzen Zocker weltweit auch aufspringen

[suparich]

so eine gelddruckmaschine wie nettel?

kurs steht bei 4 cent und die wollen an die AMEX, das ist doch nicht der Ernst dieses Unternehmens oder?
Hört sich vielmehr wie eine billige News an um noch einige unentschlosseneunerfahrene Anleger zur Investition zu überzeugen.
Wie siehts aus, mit was verdienen den dir ihr Geld? Und vorallem verdienen die überhaupt was?


Ein neuer Fall für mcstocks.de ??

[MCGabriel]

Die machen ne spezielle Software Solltest Dir schon ein paar Stunden die Mühe machen und das ganze durchkauen

Aber ich frage mich warum shortet NITE so einen Haufen Aktien von denen

Hat da jemand einen Vorschlag, vor allem wie kann der Rückkauf in der Praxis vonstatten gehen oder sind die auf einen Schlag pleite.

Hat jemand schon ähnliche Erfahrungen gemacht?

[lenny007]

Nettel, Sun, PRVH usw.
lauter Luftnummern.

[Die_eine_]

Hallo MC hab schon seit einiger Zeit ne kleine Pos könnste recht haben!
Was sind den die vorausetungen für die Amex?
Gruß Sabrina

[MCGabriel]

Ist der DOW nicht auch eine Luftnummer ???

Börse ist zum Spekuliewren da und man kann Langfristig kaufen oder auch kurzfristig. Es steht nirgends, daß man seine gekauften Shares ewig behält. Börse ist Spekulation und Geld gewinnen oder Verlieren, ob Luftnumer oder nicht, vermag von uns alle hier keiner sagen. Das wird die Zukunft zeigen

[MCGabriel]

Zu 8 - weiß ich nicht so genau. Dachte mal da bräuchte man 3 Dollar

Lies Dir mal den Thread mit den ca. 431 Postings übers WE durch. Vielleicht findest Du da Genaueres

[suparich]

hi MC,

das wundert mich gar nicht, das sich nur jemand interessiert, der bereits seit einger Zeit Aktien von dieser Company besitzt und doch erst seit 2 Tagen registriert ist.

Ich rieche den PushVersuch jetzt schon, genau wie drei oder vier Tage vor den Nettel Zahlen, hieß dein Thread: 100% und mehr mom. billiger Einstieg.... oder irgendwie so, dann kamen einige Tage später die Zahlen und die waren so schlecht, das man nun nettel abschreiben kann und wahrscheinlich noch eingie Anleger ihr geld verbraten haben.
Aber wahrscheinlich nicht die die_eine_ denn die verliert ja auch kein Geld bei Nanosignal, da sie nicht sie selbst ist.

Username: Die_eine_
Registriert seit: 09.09.2004
User ist momentan: Online seit 11.09.2004 15:56:35
Threads: 0
Postings: 4 [ Durchschnittlich 2,2812 Beiträge/Tag ]
Postings der letzten 30 Tage anzeigen
Interessen: keine Angaben


Ich will hier keinem was unterstellen, es soll sich nur jeder seine Gedanken machen, sind wir hier aufm Fischmarkt?

[jeff]

Hej ENGEL GABRIEL dich gibts ja auch noch....
bist du es wirklich?

Gruss
Jeffe

[SoWhat]

Hallo MC,

die Meldung mit dem Rechtsstreit ist jetzt 11 Tage alt, also kennt der Markt, oder diejenigen, die sich mit der Aktie beschäftigen, diese News genau. Sowas blockiert eigentlich erstmal und NITE sind Profies in dem Geschäft, die über Anwaltsetagen verfügen. Deshalb seh ich da keine große Chance. Ob man die Meldung mit dem "Amex-Listing" nur mal so nachgeschoben hat, um Interesse zu wecken, kann ich natürlich nicht beurteilen, aus meiner Sicht eher ja. Bevor die an der AMEX gelistet werden, hast Du Deine Rente durch. JMO

Happy Weekend

sowhat

[Die_eine_]

suparich mach mal bloß langsam lese schon länger mit und hab schon so manchen guten Tip erhalten bloß weil ich hier "NEU" bin darf ich wohl nicht schreiben oder wie
Kopfschütelnd Sabrina

[Die_eine_]

unverschämter Kerl

[SoWhat]

Ist echt unverschämt, was einem hier so alles unterstellt wird

Wünsche Dir viel Glück in der Gemeinde und das Du uns lange erhalten bleibst

sowhat

[Die_eine_]

SoWhat Danke denke hier wird es mir bestimmt gut gefallen

Sabrina

[Paul_Muadib]

also leude,

um ein für alle mal mit dem märchen auf zu räumen, dass für ein amex-listing 3$ über 30 tage oder son quatsch von nöten ist, werde ich hier gleich mal die standards reinstellen:

dieses märchen wird von vielen otcbb-zockern gern genommen um newbies zu sugerieren, das der kurs auf 3$ steigen muss! so einen unsinn und das von leuten wie mcgabriel, die es eigentlich besser wissen müssen!!!!!!

da frage ich mich, wie es kommen kann, das solch erfahrene leute, die über audits bei prvh und andere aktien behaupten gut informiert zu sein, behaupten können, das für ein amex-listing 3$ gebraucht werden????

da kann ich nur mit dem kopf schütteln!!!

aber hier die standards:

Listing Standards for U.S. Companies
The American Stock Exchange has established certain quantitative and qualitative standards for the initial listing of U.S. companies.

Quantitative Standards

Standard 1
Shareholders` equity $4 million
Pre-tax income $750,000 in last fiscal year or in two of the last three fiscal years
Distribution1 800 public shareholders and 500,000 shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders and 1 million shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders, 500,000 shares publicly held, and average daily trading volume of 2,000 shares for previous 6 months
Price $3
Market value public float $3 million

Standard 2
Shareholders` equity $4 million
History of operations 2 years
Distribution1 800 public shareholders and 500,000 shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders and 1 million shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders, 500,000 shares publicly held, and average daily trading volume of 2,000 shares for previous 6 months
Price $3
Market value public float $15 million

Standard 3
Shareholders` equity $4 million
Total market capitalization $50 million
Distribution1 800 public shareholders and 500,000 shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders and 1 million shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders, 500,000 shares publicly held, and average daily trading volume of 2,000 shares for previous 6 months
Market value public float $15 million

Standard 4
Total market capitalization $75 million
OR
total assets and revenue of $75 million each (in most recent fiscal year or 2 of last 3 fiscal years)
Distribution1 800 public shareholders and 500,000 shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders and 1 million shares publicly held
OR
400 public shareholders, 500,000 shares publicly held, and average daily trading volume of 2,000 shares for previous 6 months
Price $3
Market value public float $20 million

1 Public shareholders and public float do not include shareholders or shares held directly or indirectly by any officer, director, controlling shareholder, or other concentrated (10 percent or greater) affiliated or family holdings.

Qualitative Standards
In evaluating listing eligibility, the Exchange also considers qualitative factors such as the nature of a company`s business, market for its products, reputation of its management, historical record and pattern of growth, financial integrity, demonstrated earnings power, and future outlook.

[MCGabriel]

Danke Paule - aber man kann nicht alles wissen

Wichtig ist, daß man informiert wird und das so früh wie irgend möglich

Fliegt NNOS Dir nächsten Woche um die Ohren, beklag Dich bitte hinterher nicht

[suparich]

@die_eine_

sollte doch keine unterstellung sein, manchmal stochert halt mal einfach ein wenig und siehe da.... auch ich heiße dich herzlich willkommen in unserer Gemeinde und wünsche dir viel Erfolg bei deinen Aktien...

Der User Die_eine_ hat in folgenden Threads geschrieben
(Zeitraum: letzte 30 Tage)


Thread Postings Ansicht Autor Datum
Der ultimative Stocknet-Info thread !!! 1810 ZockerFreak 12.09.04 15:57:06
Sehr gute News bei CMKM 4067 Cyne 12.09.04 15:34:07
§§§ Habe da etwas ausgegraben €€€ 19 MCGabriel 11.09.04 23:06:35
+++ Chance auf + 100 % und mehr +++ 155 MCGabriel 10.09.04 23:30:27

anscheinend interessierst du dich sehr für den MC Gabriel

[MCGabriel]

Ja der Erfolg macht halt anziehend Da geht es um das Shorten und Covern

Vielleicht kann sich das mal jemand reinziehen, der ein gutes nglisch kann

OH I`M GETTING SO DIZZY!! By: stervc
17 Jul 2004, 12:24 AM EDT
Msg. 43215 of 44886
Jump to msg. #
CMKX-The MMs Double Short to Double Cover…
The Market Makers (MMs) will not let CMKX achieve some major runs of sustainment until they Double Short to Double Cover in my opinion. The MMs may not win, but they won’t lose either. They must create a second set of naked short inventory above and beyond the first set originally created to trade parallel each other at a minimum. The MMs must match the sells of the original naked short to make this happen with the second set. This is why we are seeing so much volume going through at the ask as if the MMs are on a mission. That’s because they are and time is not on their side too. The volume is even more for the double shorting to match the recent buying of further naked shorted shares.
Here’s how the MMs will cover in my opinion to explain the huge volume with no movement. Let’s say that the naked short position is at 500,000,000,000 shares, which later will be 1 trillion. Let’s say that they originally naked shorted CMKX at an average price as indicated below:

100,000,000,000 x .05 = $5,000,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .04 = $4,000,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .03 = $3,000,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .02 = $2,000,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .01 = $1,000,000,000

These 500,000,000,000 shares are shares that equate to $15,000,000,000 of pure profit because these are naked shorted shares that did not exist that were made to exist when the MMs sold them to you and CUSIP numbers were assigned to each naked shorted share created. This is like the MMs creating $15,000,000,000 out of thin air at the expense o the company because when sold, they are absorbed into the float to create enhanced dilution unless bought back from the MMs to cover.

The MMs would need to put back the amount of profits to wash out the transaction for the naked short position. This means that they will have to get those naked shorted shares out of circulation. This means that they are going to have to capture those fake or counterfeit shares that were transformed into real shares with the assigning of a CUSIP number by increasing the bid to a price high enough to entice us to sell so they could capture our naked short shares to make them cease to exist to equate to make appear a situation as if nothing ever happening.

The amount that they need to put back to cover the naked shorted position is valued at $15,000,000,000. So now the thought would be for the MMs to see how they would be able to get $15,000,000,000 since they already have spent this long ago because they thought that CMKX was like most of your penny stocks and would not succeed in their long term business plans. This first naked shorted position of 500,000,000,000 shares equates to $15,000,000,000 that we will call the Fist Set of Inventory for a better understanding.

The MMs would need to “double short” to “double cover” to make this happen. This means that they will short CMKX for a second time to position themselves to do a double cover at much higher prices to where they not only break-even, but possibly make a profit. This is done by the MMs creating a Second Set of Inventory to use as MM leverage.

To do this they will need to make $15,000,000,000 to break-even and account for 500,000,000,000 shares of CMKX. They could have started this process at .0007 cent(s). This means that they paid $250,000,000 per the amount below to come up with the 500,000,000,000 shares:

100,000,000,000 x .0007 = $70,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .0006 = $60,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .0005 = $50,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .0004 = $40,000,000
100,000,000,000 x .0003 = $30,000,000

Again, this means that the MMs paid $250,000,000 to get a Second Set of Inventory of naked short shares to equate to their First Set of Inventory of naked short shares. Each set is 500,000,000,000 shares mirroring each other in trade. The 2 sets totaled equates to 1 trillion shares naked shorted. This is how they will “double short” to “double cover” to fix this situation.

The initial $15,000,000,000 gained from the First Set of Inventory of naked shorted shares was pure profit and the MMs are only tapping into their profits of money they never had anyway before they naked shorted to cover. So the $15,000,000,000 - $250,000,000 = $14,750,000,000 of profit after creating their Second Set of Inventory.

The MMs must get 500,000,000,000 to use as leverage to maintain their profits or at least break even. To get these shares, they create a Second Set of Inventory for 500,000,000,000 shares back to themselves. This is the same concept as to when the sold us shareholders 500,000,000,000 shares that did not exist. They are just selling them to themselves now with assigned CUSIP numbers making them real shares with real value that is in their hands now when they sell. This is a naked short position that they have now created for themselves that they can control when to cover.

Since there are 2 sets of inventory of naked short shares, this means that there are 2 sets of covering that must at least mirror themselves during the covering process. The first set of inventory for covering will be the MMs trying to get us as shareholders to sell back our 500,000,000,000 naked short shares to get them out of circulation for existing by increasing the bid to entice us to sell at the prices that are attractive to our desires for profits. When we sell, they cover naked short shares from the first set of inventory.

The second set of inventory for covering will be the MMs simply selling back to themselves 500,000,000,000 naked short shares to get those out of circulation for existing by holding and selling any shares before or lower than any of the shares sold from the first set of inventory. When they sell, they cover naked short shares from the second set of inventory. Let’s further explain how this would work…

To do this, the MMs will establish what I will call Levels of Covering. To keep things simple, let’s arbitrarily pick 5 Levels of Covering; .10 cents, .20 cents, .30 cents, .40 cents, and .50 cents. Remember, the primary goal is to get the 500,000,000,000 shares out of circulation out of our hands so they could make them go away.

They will place their second set of inventory of 500,000,000,000 at a limit to sell at .10 cents. They will now raise the price of CMKX up to .10 cents. Every share that we sell all the way up to .10 cents gets deducted from the second set of inventory because the MMs will sell the equivalent amount of shares sold to capture the lost of money used that they had to pay for our shares when we sold. Example:

Let’s say that when they first attempted to entice us to sell to get shares to cover for the first set on inventory, they only got 100,000,000,000 naked short out of circulation. This means that the most that the MMs could have paid for those shares were:

100,000,000,000 x .10 cents = $10,000,000,000

This means that they will now sell 100,000,000,000 from the second set of inventory at .10 cents back to themselves to give them back the $10,000,000,000 they spent to pay for the amount it cost for buying our 100,000,000,000 share from the first set of inventory.

This was an even wash of 100,000,000,000 naked short shares removed from both sets of inventory totaling 200,000,000,000 naked shorted shares. This reduces the 1 trillion shares naked shorted down to 800,000,000,000 shares needing to be covered. This leaves 400,000,000,000 for each set of inventory remaining to be covered.

This process will repeat at each level of the 5 levels of covering to next include the .20 cents, .30 cents, .40 cents, and .50 cents per 100,000,000,000 shares at each level. The numbers could fluctuate for what could actually transpire. The point to see is that the MMs will double cover and sell whenever we sell to make sure they at least breakeven to wash out the money that would be spent for running up the price to entice selling by increasing the bid. Some shareholders will hold and the resolution for that will take another post to explain this process. (I could explain it faster in Paltalk or on the phone.)

Again, please keep in mind, the MMs didn’t spend money to get any of the first set of inventory of naked short shares. They created these shares out of nowhere to make them exist electronically by assigning them CUSIP numbers to make them manifest in the brokerage accounts. All of this was pure profit from using our money to sell us the fictitiously created shares. This is when during the creation of the first set of inventory; the naked short shares went to the shareholders while the profits went to the MMs.

To further keep in mind, the MMs didn’t spend money to get any of the second set of inventory of naked short shares. They created these shares too out of nowhere to make them exist electronically by assigning them CUSIP numbers to make them manifest in their brokerage accounts this time. All of this was pure profit too from using no money at all to simply fictitiously create shares. This is when during the creation of the second set of inventory; the naked short shares went to the MMs this time along with the profits going to the MMs too.

So when you are wondering why we are getting all of this volume and no movement, understand that this is something that could be happening to keep the MMs from either going out of business, facing multiple class action law suits, or just simply being out of lots of money. This is how the MMs might not always win, but they won’t lose either. They will seldom ever lose.

They are here to create and maintain an orderly market and sometimes naked shorting shares was a technique used to help to establish more liquidity to a stock until enough volume was generated for that stock to trade in an orderly fashion. It has grown to another venue to harness the greed for money and power that has grown to a level to where the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. There is much more to this story that really should not be discussed on these message boards.

For those who are wondering where was all the volume to show 1 trillion shares traded, read the post below:
http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB0…

These were only my opinions that I created as food for thought since many were hungry for an understanding. I hope their minds are full from this meal.

This is another thought/opinion as to what could explain the reasons for all of the volume while slowly downward trending. I think that we will soon see the reasons why Urban and Roger Glenn had come into the lives of each other for the benefit of all shareholders!
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219…
All is well!
http://www.sterlingsclass.com/

;-)
Sterling

[Howto45]

@MCGabriel
Auch ich habe etwas ausgegraben: Auf der NASDAQ-Seite sind ja auch die SEC-Fillings zu finden.
Man braucht sich nur den letzten Quartalsbericht von Nanosignal ansehen, dann ist jedem klar was das für ein "Scheiß-Laden" ist.
hier kurz die Highlights:
Vermögenswerte: Cash 1213,-$ (ja in Worten Eintausendzweihundertdreizehn!)
Besitz und Ausstattung: 60.425,-$
Paitings(!): 10.000,-$ (hat der der CEO zum Pinsel gegriffen?)
Macht eine Summe von 71.638,-$
Aufgelaufenes Defizit: 28.790.648,-$ !!
So , dann erobert mal schön die Welt.
(Quelle:NASDAQ.COM)
ich hoffe,das nicht zuviele auf deine Postings reinfallen.
Es gibt interessantere Titel!
Schönen Abend noch Leute!

[MCGabriel]

Howto, es geht hierbei nicht darum, sich in NNOS zu verlieben ondern um die Phantasie, daß NITE sich eindecken muß, weil die mit knapp 500 Millione Stücke short sind. Laß das Filing Filing sein und benutz Deinen Verstand

[suparich]

Verstand? MC Verstand?

Es geht doch wirklich nicht mehr um den Verstand, wenn man sich noch mit so einem Schrott wert beschäftigen muss. Wo stehen denn heute Nettel, Sun PRVH und so weiter und wo wird NNOS stehen, wenn sie Schulden haben von 28 Mio und dann noch an die Amex möchten mit einem Kurs von 2 cent und einen Umsatz von 1200€, die haben wahrscheinlich einige Sachen auf dem Flohmarkt verkauft oder wie kommen denn sonst die 1200€ zusammen?

Mit geht es hier nicht um persönliches, um einzelene Personen und Beschuldigungen, doch ich bin nun seit einiger Zeit registriert und mit fällt auf, das in einigen Foren fast alle aktien gepuscht werden ohne ende und es reichen keine 100% sondern 1000% oder 10000% und immer wieder die gleiche Masche, aufgrund von dubiosen News, einer Kaufempfehlung, die Aussicht auf einen Umsatz der noch gar nicht da ist oder irgendein Pennystock-Fänger hat mal wieder die neuste Printausgaben mit blöden Gewäsch herausgegeben, erkennt man nun nach einiger Zeit die maroden Verhältnisse und legt die rosafarbene Brille wieder ab dann erkennt dann meistens das man auf einen Berg Aktien sitzt und sie nun nicht mehr verkaufen kann ohne die Hälfte seines Geldes zu verlieren...
Wie soll man denn vernünftig geld mit Aktien verdienen wenn 75% Müll ist???

Ich poste dies nicht, aus Frust weil ich ein paar euros vielleicht schon deswegen verloren hab sondern nur aus dem einen Grund, da diese Verhältnisse sich meistens jeder fachlichen Grundlage entziehen und somit das Niveau bis zum Nullpunkt absinkt und ein Image kann man nicht kaufen, das erwirbt man sich durch Leistung, Einsatzbereitschaft und Loyalität

[Paul_Muadib]

mädels,

da ich tief in cmkm stecke kann ich euch sagen, solange nnos nichts an substanzieller news rausbringt (z.b eine cash-divy, 100 mio auftrag oder sonstwas) wird nite niemals im leben covern!!!

habe mit cmkm was covern angeht viel erfahrungen gesammelt.

nennt mir doch bitte einnen grund warum nite anfangen soll zu covern?

paul

[benefactor [KommA]]

Solidarität

[gauner1]

dass 90% aller 0tc-werte müll sind, ist es jedem klar. es ist auch jedem klar, dass es bei 0tc-werte um Spielen geht und das spiel mit hohem risiko verbunden ist. wenn jemand über nnos posetiv geschrieben hat, hat er auch in der letzten Zeile seines Beitrages betont, dass hier wie bei allen otc-werte hohes risiko verbunden ist und gewinne sofort mitgenommen werden sollen.

andererseits muss man auch sagen, dass gerade bei den schrottwerten auf 0tc gutes geld verdient werden kann. man muss nur wissen, wo und wie. 90% der otc-werte sind nicht zum geldanlegen, sondern nur zum spielen.

ob pushen oder bushen hat keinen einfluß auf das spiel der MM ( mafiabande ) in usa.

[Paul_Muadib]

gauner

pushen, da hast du wohl recht!

paul

[MCGabriel]

Jetzt kommt wieder der Zeitpunkt wo man rein könnte

Bin im Moment jedoch auf eine andere richtige Pinky-Perle verliebt, die nicht mal an der OTC ist aber bald wohl an der Amex

Kopf hoch es geht bald wieder hoch. Bin noch mit paar Stücken drin.

Mittlerweile habe ich begriffen, daß die MM`s die Aktien gar nicht rückkaufen müssen und so viele Firmen kaputt machen, nur des Gelds wegen

Da wird ja jetzt anscheinend ein Riegel vorgeschoben - hoffentlich wirds dann besser