Steinhoff International (Seite 2504)
eröffnet am 15.04.16 20:55:50 von
neuester Beitrag 19.04.24 21:30:16 von
neuester Beitrag 19.04.24 21:30:16 von
Beiträge: 84.618
ID: 1.230.061
ID: 1.230.061
Aufrufe heute: 27
Gesamt: 13.206.687
Gesamt: 13.206.687
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: NL0011375019 · WKN: A14XB9
Neuigkeiten
| TitelBeiträge |
|---|
31.05.24 · Felix Haupt Anzeige |
23.05.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
13.05.24 · dpa-AFX |
13.05.24 · dpa-AFX |
Werte aus der Branche Konsum
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 5,9750 | +342,59 | |
| 0,5800 | +72,62 | |
| 4,4500 | +20,27 | |
| 1,2200 | +13,31 | |
| 10.500,00 | +9,38 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,1200 | -10,40 | |
| 11,060 | -15,57 | |
| 35,60 | -20,00 | |
| 1,9300 | -26,89 | |
| 1,9500 | -64,55 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 65.336.747 von 911turbo911 am 09.10.20 16:09:23nix, was sonst 
Was passiert jetzt
bin mal wieder dabei mit einer kleinen Tradingposition, nach langer Zeit der Abstinenz.
Wird aber nicht lange im Depot bleiben fürchte ich.
Mal sehen ...
Wird aber nicht lange im Depot bleiben fürchte ich.
Mal sehen ...
Bitte zurück zur 0,04
Eine Nachricht zur rechten Zeit
🌼👊👍✌️
🌼👊👍✌️
Trading Spotlight
Sieht so aus als ob sie jetzt anspringt.
H2P 😎
H2P 😎
09.10.2020 / 15:25
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Update on Steinhoff Global Settlement
Further to the announcement on 27 July 2020 (the "July Announcement") by Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. ("SIHNV" and together with its subsidiaries, "Steinhoff") and, the former South African holding company, Steinhoff International Holdings Proprietary Limited ("SIHPL"), of a proposal to settle the various legacy litigation and claims against Steinhoff (the "Proposed Settlement"), Steinhoff is providing the following updates on the settlement process:
Implementation Progress
Steinhoff has been in active discussions with litigants, their legal representatives, creditors and other relevant parties throughout the period since the July Announcement. While the number of parties involved, across multiple jurisdictions, has made the process more complex and time-consuming than originally anticipated, real progress has now been made to clarify key points and to continue the preparatory work necessary to implement the proposal and to settle the various claims against Steinhoff. While further work is required to achieve this outcome, including securing the support of certain counterparties who have not yet agreed to do so, the process remains on track.
Launch of Consent Request to Financial Creditors
As noted in the July Announcement, the Proposed Settlement requires the approval of Steinhoff's financial creditors. A consent request has been launched today to obtain the formal support of the financial creditors to the terms and proposed implementation of the settlement. The period in which to obtain consents under the various finance documents is expected to last approximately three weeks. Steinhoff anticipates that it will receive the necessary consents within this timeframe. For certain of Steinhoff's financial instruments, all lender consent is required (although abstention is not a vote against the proposal) and, in the event that the necessary consent levels are not achieved, SIHNV will consider using a UK scheme of arrangement to obtain the required consents. Such a scheme (if required) would take approximately eight weeks following the expiry of the lender consent deadline.
Application to the South African Reserve Bank
Steinhoff has recently applied to the Financial Surveillance Department of the South African Reserve Bank ("Finsurv") for consent to the cross-border payments to be made as part of the Proposed Settlement. There is no fixed timetable for Finsurv to respond to the application, but Steinhoff expects to remain in active discussions with Finsurv on its application.
Louis du Preez, Chief Executive Officer and Management Board member, said:
"Settlement of the legacy legal claims against Steinhoff remains our top priority and we are fully focused on securing the route towards the implementation of our previously announced proposal. Discussions with the various parties are progressing and the actions being announced today demonstrate that headway is being made.
We remain confident that the proposed settlement is in the best interests of all stakeholders and we look forward to receiving the levels of support necessary for implementation of the proposed settlement."
Further Information
Further information on the Proposed Settlement, including a Frequently Asked Questions document, is available on the following website: https://www.steinhoffinternational.com/settlement-litigation…
On this website, claimants may submit their contact and claim details, inform Steinhoff of their intention to support the Proposed Settlement and register for updates. Alternatively, Steinhoff's investor relations team can be contacted by email at settlement@steinhoff.co.za or settlement@steinhoffinternational.com.
Further updates on progress to finalise and implement the Proposed Settlement will be provided in due course.
Stellenbosch, South Africa
9 October 2020
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
postmaster@tradition.ch
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Update on Steinhoff Global Settlement
Further to the announcement on 27 July 2020 (the "July Announcement") by Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. ("SIHNV" and together with its subsidiaries, "Steinhoff") and, the former South African holding company, Steinhoff International Holdings Proprietary Limited ("SIHPL"), of a proposal to settle the various legacy litigation and claims against Steinhoff (the "Proposed Settlement"), Steinhoff is providing the following updates on the settlement process:
Implementation Progress
Steinhoff has been in active discussions with litigants, their legal representatives, creditors and other relevant parties throughout the period since the July Announcement. While the number of parties involved, across multiple jurisdictions, has made the process more complex and time-consuming than originally anticipated, real progress has now been made to clarify key points and to continue the preparatory work necessary to implement the proposal and to settle the various claims against Steinhoff. While further work is required to achieve this outcome, including securing the support of certain counterparties who have not yet agreed to do so, the process remains on track.
Launch of Consent Request to Financial Creditors
As noted in the July Announcement, the Proposed Settlement requires the approval of Steinhoff's financial creditors. A consent request has been launched today to obtain the formal support of the financial creditors to the terms and proposed implementation of the settlement. The period in which to obtain consents under the various finance documents is expected to last approximately three weeks. Steinhoff anticipates that it will receive the necessary consents within this timeframe. For certain of Steinhoff's financial instruments, all lender consent is required (although abstention is not a vote against the proposal) and, in the event that the necessary consent levels are not achieved, SIHNV will consider using a UK scheme of arrangement to obtain the required consents. Such a scheme (if required) would take approximately eight weeks following the expiry of the lender consent deadline.
Application to the South African Reserve Bank
Steinhoff has recently applied to the Financial Surveillance Department of the South African Reserve Bank ("Finsurv") for consent to the cross-border payments to be made as part of the Proposed Settlement. There is no fixed timetable for Finsurv to respond to the application, but Steinhoff expects to remain in active discussions with Finsurv on its application.
Louis du Preez, Chief Executive Officer and Management Board member, said:
"Settlement of the legacy legal claims against Steinhoff remains our top priority and we are fully focused on securing the route towards the implementation of our previously announced proposal. Discussions with the various parties are progressing and the actions being announced today demonstrate that headway is being made.
We remain confident that the proposed settlement is in the best interests of all stakeholders and we look forward to receiving the levels of support necessary for implementation of the proposed settlement."
Further Information
Further information on the Proposed Settlement, including a Frequently Asked Questions document, is available on the following website: https://www.steinhoffinternational.com/settlement-litigation…
On this website, claimants may submit their contact and claim details, inform Steinhoff of their intention to support the Proposed Settlement and register for updates. Alternatively, Steinhoff's investor relations team can be contacted by email at settlement@steinhoff.co.za or settlement@steinhoffinternational.com.
Further updates on progress to finalise and implement the Proposed Settlement will be provided in due course.
Stellenbosch, South Africa
9 October 2020
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
postmaster@tradition.ch
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 65.331.170 von ZockerFreak am 09.10.20 08:48:28
Klar kenne ich den Unterschied zwischen Marktkapitalisierung und Kurs,
der Kurs hat sich versechsfacht von 5 auf gestern 32 Cent und damit die Marktkapitalisierung auch.
So einfach ist das. Für den Aktionär, der bei z.B. 10 Cent eingestiegen ist, ist das eine schöne Sache, egal wie hoch die Marktkapitalisierung ist, wenn er seine Aktien z.B. bei 30 Cent verkauft hat.
200 % Gewinn.
Ich kenne mich mit Solarworld nicht aus, weiß auch nicht, wie der Kurs heute steht und wie es weitergeht mit dem Kurs.
Eine ähnliche Entwicklung bei Steinhoff ist ausgeschlossen?
Die einen meinen ja, die anderen nein.
Klar kenne ich den Unterschied zwischen Marktkapitalisierung und Kurs,
der Kurs hat sich versechsfacht von 5 auf gestern 32 Cent und damit die Marktkapitalisierung auch.
So einfach ist das. Für den Aktionär, der bei z.B. 10 Cent eingestiegen ist, ist das eine schöne Sache, egal wie hoch die Marktkapitalisierung ist, wenn er seine Aktien z.B. bei 30 Cent verkauft hat.
200 % Gewinn.
Ich kenne mich mit Solarworld nicht aus, weiß auch nicht, wie der Kurs heute steht und wie es weitergeht mit dem Kurs.
Eine ähnliche Entwicklung bei Steinhoff ist ausgeschlossen?
Die einen meinen ja, die anderen nein.
MGQ
meine Paranoia will ich hier nicht diskutieren.
Fest steht, Du hast keine Beweise dafür, dass das FTI Video in keinem Zusammenhang mit dem Stand der der Verhandlungen von Steinhoff mit den Klägern steht. Ich für meine Sicht der Dinge allerdings auch nicht, außer den schwachen Hinweis, dass sich das Video letztlich auf alle Stakeholder bezog.
Aber Du hast Recht, das beweist nichts.
Was ich nicht verstanden habe ist Folgendes, wenn die Gläubiger an Steinhoffs Besitz in SA gar nicht herankommen können, warum hat man die außersüdafrikaniscven Besitzungen den Gläubigern nicht einfach vor Füße geworfen und in die Verwertung geführt und nicht allein mit Pepkor etc. Weitergemacht?
Man wäre die europäischen Assets losgeworden und deren Schulden auch.
Warum ist Steinhoff da FTI gefolgt?
meine Paranoia will ich hier nicht diskutieren.
Fest steht, Du hast keine Beweise dafür, dass das FTI Video in keinem Zusammenhang mit dem Stand der der Verhandlungen von Steinhoff mit den Klägern steht. Ich für meine Sicht der Dinge allerdings auch nicht, außer den schwachen Hinweis, dass sich das Video letztlich auf alle Stakeholder bezog.
Aber Du hast Recht, das beweist nichts.
Was ich nicht verstanden habe ist Folgendes, wenn die Gläubiger an Steinhoffs Besitz in SA gar nicht herankommen können, warum hat man die außersüdafrikaniscven Besitzungen den Gläubigern nicht einfach vor Füße geworfen und in die Verwertung geführt und nicht allein mit Pepkor etc. Weitergemacht?
Man wäre die europäischen Assets losgeworden und deren Schulden auch.
Warum ist Steinhoff da FTI gefolgt?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 65.327.069 von Ines43 am 08.10.20 19:42:13Den unterschied vom kurs und der marktkapitalisierung kennst du schon 👍
Durchsuchen
Steinhoff International
