Rambus jetzt kaufen! 01.10.03 bis $50 (Seite 47)
eröffnet am 02.10.03 07:56:08 von
neuester Beitrag 27.02.24 15:10:16 von
neuester Beitrag 27.02.24 15:10:16 von
Beiträge: 7.076
ID: 781.947
ID: 781.947
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 802.206
Gesamt: 802.206
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US7509171069 · WKN: 906870 · Symbol: RMBS
59,30
USD
+0,82 %
+0,48 USD
Letzter Kurs 02:00:00 Nasdaq
Neuigkeiten
| Titel |
|---|
15.05.24 · Business Wire (engl.)  |
29.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
29.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
08.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
01.03.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
Werte aus der Branche Hardware
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 7,0000 | +16,67 | |
| 3,4200 | +15,54 | |
| 0,8200 | +15,33 | |
| 1,3500 | +14,41 | |
| 1,3345 | +11,05 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 0,5420 | -3,21 | |
| 4,1600 | -3,26 | |
| 6,8800 | -6,01 | |
| 0,7716 | -7,59 | |
| 20,400 | -9,73 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
The Motley Fool
POST OF THE DAY
Rambus, Inc.
The FTC Has a Bigger Agenda?
By cryptscrypt
August 15, 2006
Posts selected for this feature rarely stand alone. They are usually a part of an ongoing thread, and are out of context when presented here. The material should be read in that light. How are these posts selected? Click here to find out and nominate a post yourself!
Long ago...I believe it was Nic that said the FTC may have a larger agenda than merely Rambus vs. the MM's. We discussed the FTC's desire to expand the limits of their authority and power. The other day I was having a discussion with an attorney, which renewed this line of thinking.
Intellectual property is property that exists solely because of government. IP exists because of the laws relating to patents and their enforcement. This attorney posited the question "Are IP rights unlimited?" He said the Supremes have answered this question in the negative. Sorry but I do not have a case citation. The next question then is what are the limits of intellectual property rights? Does an IP holder have the right to charge whatever royalty he wants...regardless of the greater good of society at large? This attorney said the Supremes have not answered this question or any question really that relates to the limitations on IP rights except to say that the right is not unlimited.
This may be precisely the area the FTC is seeking to "move into" in their attempt to expand their power and influence. In the case of certain critical IP, that effects the society at large, the FTC is saying government grants the IP right and government will now step into certain situations and have a say in what kind of a royalty rate is acceptable (to the government). Meaning that the government is not going to allow an IP holder to use his IP right to extract a royalty on a key technology that is good for him but harmful for others...be they others in the industry or consumers in general.
I'm certainly not saying that the rates Rambus is seeking are damaging to the MM's but you can bet this is exactly the song the Micron lobby machine has been, and still is singing to anyone in government who will listen.
The ramifications of this are significantly larger than Rambus. An area of similarity that has long been recognized is the regulation of new pharmaceutical drugs.
If the FTC is successful in getting Rambus to "come to the table" and negotiate their royalty rates, the precedent setting effect of this could be very significant. The FTC will have succeeded in enlarging the sphere of their influence regardless of their congressional charter.
If viewed in this light, it may not be surprising that the commissioners brushed aside the ALJ's findings in their entirety and beckoned Rambus to the bargaining table. What they really seek is an extension of their influence into the undefined region of what governmental limits can be placed on the rights of intellectual property holders.
Just some thoughts....
Crypt
Quelle : http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2006/060815.htm
Hallo voltago01,
mach ich doch gerne
Gruß
ixilon
POST OF THE DAY
Rambus, Inc.
The FTC Has a Bigger Agenda?
By cryptscrypt
August 15, 2006
Posts selected for this feature rarely stand alone. They are usually a part of an ongoing thread, and are out of context when presented here. The material should be read in that light. How are these posts selected? Click here to find out and nominate a post yourself!
Long ago...I believe it was Nic that said the FTC may have a larger agenda than merely Rambus vs. the MM's. We discussed the FTC's desire to expand the limits of their authority and power. The other day I was having a discussion with an attorney, which renewed this line of thinking.
Intellectual property is property that exists solely because of government. IP exists because of the laws relating to patents and their enforcement. This attorney posited the question "Are IP rights unlimited?" He said the Supremes have answered this question in the negative. Sorry but I do not have a case citation. The next question then is what are the limits of intellectual property rights? Does an IP holder have the right to charge whatever royalty he wants...regardless of the greater good of society at large? This attorney said the Supremes have not answered this question or any question really that relates to the limitations on IP rights except to say that the right is not unlimited.
This may be precisely the area the FTC is seeking to "move into" in their attempt to expand their power and influence. In the case of certain critical IP, that effects the society at large, the FTC is saying government grants the IP right and government will now step into certain situations and have a say in what kind of a royalty rate is acceptable (to the government). Meaning that the government is not going to allow an IP holder to use his IP right to extract a royalty on a key technology that is good for him but harmful for others...be they others in the industry or consumers in general.
I'm certainly not saying that the rates Rambus is seeking are damaging to the MM's but you can bet this is exactly the song the Micron lobby machine has been, and still is singing to anyone in government who will listen.
The ramifications of this are significantly larger than Rambus. An area of similarity that has long been recognized is the regulation of new pharmaceutical drugs.
If the FTC is successful in getting Rambus to "come to the table" and negotiate their royalty rates, the precedent setting effect of this could be very significant. The FTC will have succeeded in enlarging the sphere of their influence regardless of their congressional charter.
If viewed in this light, it may not be surprising that the commissioners brushed aside the ALJ's findings in their entirety and beckoned Rambus to the bargaining table. What they really seek is an extension of their influence into the undefined region of what governmental limits can be placed on the rights of intellectual property holders.
Just some thoughts....
Crypt
Quelle : http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2006/060815.htm
Hallo voltago01,
mach ich doch gerne
Gruß
ixilon
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 23.486.442 von voltago01 am 17.08.06 18:50:00zensur............?
!
Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an feedback@wallstreet-online.de!
Dieser Beitrag wurde vom System automatisch gesperrt. Bei Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an feedback@wallstreet-online.de
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 23.486.378 von ixilon am 17.08.06 18:45:48Schön, dass Du hier noch die Fahne hochhältst...
Trading Spotlight
17.08.2006 11:43
Ex-CEO Tate verlässt Rambus-Vorstand
Bei der Veröffentlichung der Geschäftszahlen für das zweite Quartal 2006 musste sich Rambus auf den vorläufigen Umsatz beschränken. Aussagen zu Gewinn und Verlust seien nicht möglich, da wegen Unregelmäßigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit Aktienoptionen ermittelt werde. Durch die Verzögerungen bei der Vorlage des Quartalsberichtes droht dem Chiptechnik-Entwickler der Ausschluss seiner Aktien vom Börsenhandel durch die Aufsichtsbehörde SEC. Um etwaigen Interessenskonflikten bei der internen Aufklärung der Angelegenheit vorzubeugen, scheidet Geoff Tate aus dem Vorstand des Unternehmens aus.
Tate war von 1999 bis 2005 CEO von Rambus. Als alleiniges Mitglied des Aktienoptionskomitees des Unternehmens steht Tate daher auch in der Verantwortung für diesbezügliche Entscheidungen in den von den Untersuchungen betroffenen Jahren 2003, 2004 und 2005. Rambus ist nicht das einzige Unternehmen, das wegen einer Aktienoptionsaffäre unter Druck steht. Auch beispielsweise Apple und den Aktien von Juniper Networks könnte ein Ausschluss vom Börsenparkett drohen. (map/c't)
Quelle : http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/76934/from/rss09
Ex-CEO Tate verlässt Rambus-Vorstand
Bei der Veröffentlichung der Geschäftszahlen für das zweite Quartal 2006 musste sich Rambus auf den vorläufigen Umsatz beschränken. Aussagen zu Gewinn und Verlust seien nicht möglich, da wegen Unregelmäßigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit Aktienoptionen ermittelt werde. Durch die Verzögerungen bei der Vorlage des Quartalsberichtes droht dem Chiptechnik-Entwickler der Ausschluss seiner Aktien vom Börsenhandel durch die Aufsichtsbehörde SEC. Um etwaigen Interessenskonflikten bei der internen Aufklärung der Angelegenheit vorzubeugen, scheidet Geoff Tate aus dem Vorstand des Unternehmens aus.
Tate war von 1999 bis 2005 CEO von Rambus. Als alleiniges Mitglied des Aktienoptionskomitees des Unternehmens steht Tate daher auch in der Verantwortung für diesbezügliche Entscheidungen in den von den Untersuchungen betroffenen Jahren 2003, 2004 und 2005. Rambus ist nicht das einzige Unternehmen, das wegen einer Aktienoptionsaffäre unter Druck steht. Auch beispielsweise Apple und den Aktien von Juniper Networks könnte ein Ausschluss vom Börsenparkett drohen. (map/c't)
Quelle : http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/76934/from/rss09
6 Monatschart
Aug. 16, 2006, 4:43PM
[URLRambus to Fight Delisting Notice]http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4121934.html[/URL]
.
[URLRambus to Fight Delisting Notice]http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4121934.html[/URL]
.
By Colin Barker
Special to CNET News.com
Published: August 16, 2006, 1:15 PM PDT
[URLTate quits Rambus amid stock options probe]http://news.com.com/Tate+quits+Rambus+amid+stock+options+probe/2100-1014_3-6106461.html[/URL]
.
Special to CNET News.com
Published: August 16, 2006, 1:15 PM PDT
[URLTate quits Rambus amid stock options probe]http://news.com.com/Tate+quits+Rambus+amid+stock+options+probe/2100-1014_3-6106461.html[/URL]
.
08-16-06 Dow Jones Newswires
HERB GREENBERG: Why The Big Board Doesn't Delist Companies Late With Filings
By Herb Greenberg
SAN DIEGO (Dow Jones) -- Riddle me this: Why is it that Apple Computer and other Nasdaq companies are getting delisting notices after missing a single quarter's earnings, yet the likes of Krispy Kreme and American Italian Pasta remain listed after not filing for multiple quarters?
Answer: The New York Stock Exchange is far more lenient.
Big Board rules only ding companies after failing to miss a 10-K annual report, andthen,nice guys that they are , the delisting notice can go out any time within 12 months of missing an annual filing. Generally, however, it won't come until six months after the original due date unless the exchange decides to let the shares trade for an additional six months. (The exchange likes to give its companies a chance to "cure" themselves.)
That explains why Krispy Kreme (KKD) and American Italian (PLB) , which haven't filed 10-Qs in well over a year and are well behind in filing their 10- Ks, continue to trade without risk of delisting.
Will any of these companies caught in the options dragnet, including Apple ( AAPL) , be delisted? Unlikely, and Apple isn't alone. On Tuesday Juniper (JNPR) , Zoran (ZRAN) and Atmel (ATML) acknowledged they too have received a delisting notice. Other Nasdaq companies that have delayed quarterly SEC filings and are likely to get delisting notices any day now, per Nasdaq guidelines, include Cheesecake Factory (CAKE) , Sanmina (SANM) , Rambus (RMBS) , CNet (CNET) , Sapient (SAPE) , Quest Software (QSFT) , Broadcom (BRCM) and VeriSign (VRSN) .
It usually takes Nasdaq two to three business days to issue a delisting letter; companies then have four days to file an 8-K with the SEC.
Tip to the NYSE: Learn from the Nasdaq. You can never be tough enough.
Top secret
Speaking of companies that have delayed the filing of their 10-Qs, Parlux ( PARL) CEO Ilia Lekach was interviewed late last week by the Miami Herald. Lekach declined to comment to the paper because he said the company would make a number of "positive" announcements, starting Monday. On Wednesday Parlux announced it's selling its Perry Ellis line of fragrances to Victory International for $140 million.
...
Quelle : http://www.nasdaq.com//aspxcontent/newsstory.aspx?selected=R…
HERB GREENBERG: Why The Big Board Doesn't Delist Companies Late With Filings
By Herb Greenberg
SAN DIEGO (Dow Jones) -- Riddle me this: Why is it that Apple Computer and other Nasdaq companies are getting delisting notices after missing a single quarter's earnings, yet the likes of Krispy Kreme and American Italian Pasta remain listed after not filing for multiple quarters?
Answer: The New York Stock Exchange is far more lenient.
Big Board rules only ding companies after failing to miss a 10-K annual report, andthen,nice guys that they are , the delisting notice can go out any time within 12 months of missing an annual filing. Generally, however, it won't come until six months after the original due date unless the exchange decides to let the shares trade for an additional six months. (The exchange likes to give its companies a chance to "cure" themselves.)
That explains why Krispy Kreme (KKD) and American Italian (PLB) , which haven't filed 10-Qs in well over a year and are well behind in filing their 10- Ks, continue to trade without risk of delisting.
Will any of these companies caught in the options dragnet, including Apple ( AAPL) , be delisted? Unlikely, and Apple isn't alone. On Tuesday Juniper (JNPR) , Zoran (ZRAN) and Atmel (ATML) acknowledged they too have received a delisting notice. Other Nasdaq companies that have delayed quarterly SEC filings and are likely to get delisting notices any day now, per Nasdaq guidelines, include Cheesecake Factory (CAKE) , Sanmina (SANM) , Rambus (RMBS) , CNet (CNET) , Sapient (SAPE) , Quest Software (QSFT) , Broadcom (BRCM) and VeriSign (VRSN) .
It usually takes Nasdaq two to three business days to issue a delisting letter; companies then have four days to file an 8-K with the SEC.
Tip to the NYSE: Learn from the Nasdaq. You can never be tough enough.
Top secret
Speaking of companies that have delayed the filing of their 10-Qs, Parlux ( PARL) CEO Ilia Lekach was interviewed late last week by the Miami Herald. Lekach declined to comment to the paper because he said the company would make a number of "positive" announcements, starting Monday. On Wednesday Parlux announced it's selling its Perry Ellis line of fragrances to Victory International for $140 million.
...
Quelle : http://www.nasdaq.com//aspxcontent/newsstory.aspx?selected=R…
Durchsuchen
