Amerikanische Solarförderung vs. deutsche Solarförderung - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[mlolo]

kurz vor dem für uns (solaraktieninhaber) meilensteinjahr 2007 sollte man ein bisschen über den tellerrand gucken!
diese ganze zockerkacke mit " hu, ich bin ein ganz großer, weil ich 2,3% plus gemacht habe, weil ich im richtigen moment verkauft/ gekauft habe" sollte hier keine rolle spielen!

fakt ist einfach, dass die größte volkswirtschaft der welt langsam umdenkt.
wird dies nur ein strohfeuer oder wird die förderung von 3,2mrd $ für 11 Jahre aus kalifornien zu einem riesigem schneeball und modell für das gesamte land?

wenn dies geschieht, dann sind die kurssteigerungen der solaraktien, die es in deutschland gegeben hat relativ unspektakulär! davon gehe ich fest aus.
ich denke aber auch, dass es nur ein paar firmen schaffen werden. wird evergreen dazu gehören.
welche rolle können ausländische aktien auf dem amerikanischen markt spielen?

ich bin auf jeden fall euphorisiert und freue mich auf die nächsten jahre. ich hoffe aber ebenfalls auf sachlichen umgang mit dem thema, so dass pro und cotra zusammengetragen werden kann.


lg mlolo

[Bulanz]

Hier solltest du auch investieren :
steht noch am Anfang !


ARISE TECHNOLOGIES
Letzter Kurs: 0,194 Local-Id:
Veränd. abs.: -0,0010 Symbol: A3T
Veränd. in %: -0,51 % ISIN: CA04040Q1063


http://www.arisetech.com/content/blogcategory/21/145/

[Solar_Andi]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.893.169 von mlolo am 02.12.06 22:48:34

Bin da gleicher Meinung,
in Deutschland ist schon viel gelaufen.

Man sollte jetzt nach Amerika blicken, da ist enormes
"Nachholpotenzial".

Die Firmen formieren sich im Augenblick.
WorldWater&Power WKN:909889 ist gerade dabei
eine Firma zu übernehmen die Solarpanels für die
NASA lieft. Zudem investieren einige Grössere in
diese Firma. Ingesamt werden sie Mittelzuflüsse von
22,5 Mio USD erhalten.

Einer der Investoren ist Emcore WKN:905846, ein NASDAQ-Notierter Wert.

Seit Mitte Oktober geht der Kurs von WWAT Richtung Norden.

Vielen Dank auch für den ARICE Tipp. Den werde ich mal unter die Lupe nehmen.

Viele Grüsse und
schönes WE

Solar_Andi

[mlolo]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.899.249 von Solar_Andi am 03.12.06 09:22:59

in wwat bin ich bereits investiert.

weiß jemand, ob es pläne oder überlegungen in anderen us-bundesstaaten bezüglich einer solarförderung gibt?

[Dauerfrusty]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.893.169 von mlolo am 02.12.06 22:48:34

Hoffentlich gelingt es, die maximal in Quartalen denkenden amerikanischen Investoren und Kleinanleger zu einer langfristigen und auf Nachhaltigkeit bedachte Sichtweise umzupolen, und sei es auch durch sanften Druck der Politik. Die Anfänge sind ja - zumindest in Kalifornien - gemacht. Und die demokratische Mehrheit in Senat und Kongress wird weitere Pflöcke einschlagen. Nur muß wohl hin und wieder auch der dicke Knüppel als Wink mit dem Zaunpfahl (wie der Hurrican Katrina ) hinzukommen, damit die Amerikaner umdenken.

http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bon…

[Dauerfrusty]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.903.373 von mlolo am 03.12.06 13:42:39

Na, da gab es doch eine Solar-Company, die ihre Zelte in Marlborough aufgeschlagen hat. Und das liegt im Bundesstaat MA...

Gefunden bei Raging Bull, Posting # 6100

BOSTON, Nov 20, 2006 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Massachusetts represents one of the U.S.'s best locations for making solar energy an economic success, according to a recently released study by the Topline Strategy Group, a leading technology consulting and market intelligence firm. According to Jonathan Klein, founder and general partner, a modest state subsidy program for funding solar installations would enable Massachusetts to become a leader an industry poised for explosive growth in the next 25 years.
The study turns upside down the conventional wisdom of solar power being most attractive in southern, sun-belt states. The economics of solar power are based on a combination of geographic latitude, cloud cover levels, and electricity prices. However, state subsidies of 26 to 69 percent are still required to encourage consumer adoption of the technology by making the cost of adopting solar power competitive with the costs that consumers pay to traditional power utilities for their electricity. California currently is the most economical place in the United States for solar power, where state subsidies of 26.4-percent are required to make it cost effective. Massachusetts' high electricity rates and favorable amount of direct sunlight would require only a 26.8-percent subsidy, making the state the next most attractive area for solar power. The Solar Energy Industry Association projects solar energy installations to grow from a capacity to generate 650 million kilowatt-hours of electricity to 380 billion kilowatt-hours in the next 25 years -- a 58,000-percent increase "Massachusetts has a real opportunity to establish a leadership position in this hypergrowth industry, attracting significant investment and creating thousands of new jobs," said Klein. "The area is already a leader in solar research and has a strong investor base. The only missing ingredient is a subsidy program."
"Massachusetts is well positioned to lead the increasingly important alternative energy and clean tech industry," said Jim Matheson, general partner at Flagship Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts that focuses on creating and financing early stage companies in technology and life sciences. "To realize this potential, it is critical that the Massachusetts business and technology communities work closely with government leadership to design and implement programs that support alternative energy and clean tech start-ups, and to provide meaningful incentives for businesses and consumers to adopt these technologies."

[Dauerfrusty]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.899.249 von Solar_Andi am 03.12.06 09:22:59

Zur Erinnerung, ein Posting aus dem US-WWAT-Thread bei Raging Bull, Posting # 6100.

Für alle Vergesslichen, ESLR hat seinen Sitz im Bundesstaat MA....

BOSTON, Nov 20, 2006 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Massachusetts represents one of the U.S.'s best locations for making solar energy an economic success, according to a recently released study by the Topline Strategy Group, a leading technology consulting and market intelligence firm. According to Jonathan Klein, founder and general partner, a modest state subsidy program for funding solar installations would enable Massachusetts to become a leader an industry poised for explosive growth in the next 25 years. The study turns upside down the conventional wisdom of solar power being most attractive in southern, sun-belt states. The economics of solar power are based on a combination of geographic latitude, cloud cover levels, and electricity prices. However, state subsidies of 26 to 69 percent are still required to encourage consumer adoption of the technology by making the cost of adopting solar power competitive with the costs that consumers pay to traditional power utilities for their electricity. California currently is the most economical place in the United States for solar power, where state subsidies of 26.4-percent are required to make it cost effective. Massachusetts' high electricity rates and favorable amount of direct sunlight would require only a 26.8-percent subsidy, making the state the next most attractive area for solar power. The Solar Energy Industry Association projects solar energy installations to grow from a capacity to generate 650 million kilowatt-hours of electricity to 380 billion kilowatt-hours in the next 25 years -- a 58,000-percent increase "Massachusetts has a real opportunity to establish a leadership position in this hypergrowth industry, attracting significant investment and creating thousands of new jobs," said Klein. "The area is already a leader in solar research and has a strong investor base. The only missing ingredient is a subsidy program."
"Massachusetts is well positioned to lead the increasingly important alternative energy and clean tech industry," said Jim Matheson, general partner at Flagship Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts that focuses on creating and financing early stage companies in technology and life sciences. "To realize this potential, it is critical that the Massachusetts business and technology communities work closely with government leadership to design and implement programs that support alternative energy and clean tech start-ups, and to provide meaningful incentives for businesses and consumers to adopt these technologies."

[Dauerfrusty]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.829.908 von Dauerfrusty am 11.01.07 13:16:43

Sorry, das Posting #7 wollte ich eigentlich in den Nachbar-Thread "Wann ist Evergreen bei 100 Euro" einstellen.....

[Dauerfrusty]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 25.899.249 von Solar_Andi am 03.12.06 09:22:59

Gefunden im US-WWAT-Thread bei Raging Bull, Posting # 7037

By: soccertese2004
09 Jan 2007, 12:27 AM EST
Msg. 7037 of 7050
Jump to msg. #
arizona solar
Report: Ariz. ripe for solar energy
State one of top spots in nation, study says

Mark Shaffer
The Arizona Republic
Jan. 9, 2007 12:00 AM The state's solar-energy producers could generate 1,000 megawatts of power and create 3,000 jobs by 2020, according to the first solar-electric study prepared for the Arizona Department of Commerce.

The report, released Monday, also envisions a world-class solar research and development center for the state, which it says "has the best solar resources in the nation."

A total of 1,000 megawatts would provide enough power for 250,000 to 300,000 homes, according to utility company estimates.

When members of the Arizona Corporation Commission passed a renewable-energy standard last year, they paid particular interest to solar energy playing a dominant role in electric utilities generating 15 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2025.
They also thought it would be key in distributed electric generation from residential or non-utility firms taking root, which is mandated to be 30 percent of the renewable energy production by 2011.

"Our challenge is to get Arizona on the international radar for solar-energy production," said Jon Fink, an Arizona State University vice president who was on the steering committee for the solar study.

"I've just been to China to meet with the head of the largest solar company there and will be going to Germany next week for the same thing," Fink said.

"Arizona and California have the best sun in the country, and Arizona, especially, has the most developable land for this endeavor."

But Steve Roman, a Phoenix business consultant and former solar-company employee who also was on the committee, said the road to solar power contains a number of obstacles.

"It's been subsidized by different governments and power companies for good reason but it's ultimately going to have to be successful without subsidies," Roman said.

"Maybe the subsidies will empower manufacturers and allow them to make cheaper products. But that hasn't happened yet and there's no silver bullet that will make it even double the price of traditional power."

According to the study, produced by Navigant Consulting of Burlington, Mass., residential solar costs just under 30 cents a kilowatt hour, three times the current retail rate.
With federal, state and utility company subsidies, that cost is about 18 cents a kilowatt hour.

But for businesses, the cost of solar energy is about seven times that of the 7 cents a kilowatt hour they pay for power, the report says.

The report notes that significant penetration of the market with photovoltaic cells will not happen until they pay back their costs with electric generation within 10 years. That will not happen until 2020 at the earliest, according to the report.

If technological advances allow the solar market to really take off, the report notes that more than 2,600 megawatts could be produced by 2025, with 45 percent of that from the rooftops of homes.

Under that scenario, 440,000 tons of emissions from power plants that use fossil fuels, such as coal, would be eliminated.

The report cited a number of advantages Arizona has for solar-power development, such as being centrally located in the Southwest and having abundant state trust lands for large solar developments.

It also noted that the renewable energy standard would provide $1.2 billion in funding through 2025 and the state's growth rate and pro-business climate.

The report also noted that ASU has the only certified solar module testing laboratory in the country and that the University of Arizona is involved in solar-cell research and has a facility for evaluating emerging technologies.

But Arizona also has shortcomings, according to the report, such as a lack of capital infusion, competition from neighboring states and numerous homeowner associations that restrict installation of solar units.

[kojote1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.844.970 von Dauerfrusty am 11.01.07 23:06:30

da haben wir heute einen tollen inverted hammer hingelegt
nun kommt es auf den heutigen Tag an, ob sich die Formation bestätigt
so wie ich die Amis kenne tun sie uns den gefallen, und wir ziehen für länger nach oben