checkAd

    PACKARD BIOSCIENCE. 3 AUGUST ZAHLEN.!!!! fusion - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 29.07.00 10:39:34 von
    neuester Beitrag 01.08.00 17:11:56 von
    Beiträge: 5
    ID: 199.484
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 421
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.07.00 10:39:34
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      ICH SAGE BIS DEZ, ZIEL 80$
      GERÜCHT.FUSION MIT AGILENT TECH??
      ZAHLEN SOLLEN POSITIVE SEIN.

      WER weiss mehr?? manu.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.07.00 10:57:46
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      danke manu99 für die Mitteillungen über diesen Wert,

      habe leider keine Informationen ; will aber hiermit mein wohlwollen gegenüber dieser Firma
      äußern ; Meiner Meinung nach verspricht die niedrige Bewertung viel Kurspotenziel ;
      außerdem werden die Zahlen aufgrung von Umsatzbeteiligungen und Lizenzeinnahmen
      dieses gesamte Jahr aber vorallem 2001 sehr positiv ausfallen.

      P.S. Hoffe es schließen sich mehr Interessierte an
      Avatar
      schrieb am 30.07.00 20:55:47
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Hier ein paar Infos über Packard Bioscience von Merrill Lynch. Leider etwas älter (16.05.2000) aber doch ganz interessant.


      Price: $12 ¾
      12 Month Price Objective: $20
      Estimates (Dec) 1999A* 2000E* 2001E
      EPS: $0.07 $0.13 $0.23
      P/E: 182.1x 98.1x 55.4x
      EPS Change (YoY): 85.7% 76.9%
      Q2 EPS (Jun): $0.06 $0.02
      Cash Flow/Share: $0.28 $0.29 $0.40
      Price/Cash Flow: 45.5x 44.0x 31.9x
      Dividend Rate: Nil Nil Nil
      Dividend Yield: Nil Nil Nil
      Opinion & Financial Data
      Investment Opinion: D-1-1-9
      Mkt. Value / Shares Outstanding (mn): $752 / 59
      Price/Book Ratio: NM
      LT Liability % of Capital: 16.4%
      Est. 5 Year EPS Growth: 30.0%
      Stock Data
      ***3-Week Range: $12 1/4-$8 3/4
      Symbol / Exchange: PBSC / OTC
      Options: None
      Institutional Ownership-Spectrum: NA
      ML Industry Weightings & Ratings**
      Strategy; Weighting Rel. to Mkt.:
      Income: In Line (07-Mar-1995)
      Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
      Income & Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
      Capital Appreciation: Overweight (28-May-1993)
      Market Analysis; Technical Rating: Above Average (28-Mar-2000)
      **The views expressed are those of the macro department and do not
      necessarily coincide with those of the Fundamental analyst.
      For full investment opinion definitions, see footnotes.
      • Excludes non-recurring items.
      • *** Range is since 4/19/00 IPO.
      Investment Highlights:
      • We rate Packard BioScience at Buy for both
      the intermediate and longer terms.
      • We think PBSC’s valuation is attractive
      relative to such comparable companies as
      Waters or Agilent. We now think the share
      price could reach $20 in the next 12 months.
      • In our opinion, given the high leverage and
      limited float, PBSC is best suited for small
      cap, growth-oriented investors.
      Fundamental Highlights:
      • Q1 results were good. EPS of $0.02, vs. $0.03,
      were a little better than expected.
      • Organic sales growth, in local currencies, was
      a little better than expected in both life
      sciences and nuclear detection.
      • These results, first as a public company, give
      us even more confidence in our forecasts.
      Continue with our 2000 EPS estimate of $0.13,
      vs. $0.07 and 2001 estimate of $0.23.
      Comment
      United States
      Process Controls
      16 May 2000
      Donna G. Takeda, CFA
      Director Packard BioScience Co.
      Good Q1 Results BUY
      Long Term
      BUY Reason for Report: Reported Q1
      Merrill Lynch & Co.
      Global Securities Research & Economics Group
      Global Fundamental Equity Research Department
      RC#20113749.Packard BioScience Co. – 16 May 2000
      (Continued)
      2
      Good Start to the Year
      Packard BioScience reported Q1 EPS that were a little
      better than expected, at $0.02, vs. $0.01 excluding non-recurring
      items. This was the company’s first report as a
      company with public equity, although the results are for
      the period before the April 19 IPO.
      Sales came in $200K above our estimates, at $62.5
      million, up 6.4% from last year`s $58.7 million. Sales in
      both Packard Instrument and Canberra Industries were
      slightly better than expected. Unfavorable currency
      exchange rates reduced sales by approximately 250 b.p. In
      addition, the revenue comparison is difficult because last
      year’s Q1 includes about $3.2 million from product lines
      that were subsequently sold or terminated. Excluding that
      from the comparison, growth was 12.6%.
      Gross margins, at 51.4% vs. 49.5%, were better than
      expected. This was partially offset by higher ratios in
      R&D and SG&A, as the company ramps up investments to
      finish the development of new products that are in late
      stages of completion, and for applications specialists to
      enhance the selling and marketing efforts. As expected,
      EBIT margins of 12.0% vs.12.8% were lower than a year
      ago because of the R&D increase, but they were above our
      11.6% estimate.
      Segments
      Packard Instrument (64% of Q1 sales): Q1 revenue was
      $39.9 million, which was up 4.5% from last year`s $38.2
      million. On an organic basis (i.e., if we exclude from
      99/Q1 revenue product lines that were sold or terminated),
      sales grew 13.7%. Exchange rates reduced revenue by
      about $900K. Some of the surprise came from Y2K-related
      services that appeared in 00/Q1, as well as growth
      in some older, core product lines that we had expected to
      decline in Q1. Customer reception of new Windows-based
      versions of the more mature lines is better than expected.
      The fastest growth in Q1 was at CCS Packard (automation)
      and in liquid handling systems, which together grew at a
      36% rate. Gross margins were 56.1%, vs. 54.5%, largely
      because of the favorable mix.
      Canberra (36% of Q1 sales): Q1 revenue was $22.5
      million, vs. $20.5 million, for a 10.2% increase; exchange
      rates reduced reported revenue by about $600K. Most of
      the growth came from new consulting service contracts
      with the U.S. Department of Energy. Gross margins
      improved from 40.5% in 99/Q1 to 42.9% in the most
      recent period.
      Annual Estimates Look Good
      This good start to the year reinforce our confidence in our
      full year estimates. We continue to estimate full year 2000
      EPS at $0.13, which is nearly double the $0.07 earned in
      1999. Both years` figures exclude non-recurring items.
      We now estimate full year sales at $285.5-$286.0 million,
      which is up nearly 8% from last year`s $264.9 million.
      Organic, local currency-based growth should be a little
      higher than we had been thinking, but we prefer to include
      a little more currency impact given the current weakness of
      the Euro.
      For Q2, we estimate EPS, ex non-recurring items, to be
      $0.02 vs. $0.06. The decline is mainly because of the
      higher R&D this year vs. last. Interest expense should be
      above last year, although down on a sequential basis. The
      company has already paid off $68.2 million of its senior
      debt with some of its IPO proceeds. Both periods exclude
      non-recurring items.
      For 2001, we continue to estimate EPS at $0.23, which
      would be 71% above our $0.13 estimate for this year. We
      look for sales to grow by 13%-14%, to $324-$325 million,
      which assumes Packard Instrument`s sales grow by about
      17% and Canberra`s by about 8%. Packard Instrument`s
      operating margins should improve vs. this year, while
      Canberra`s narrow somewhat. The latter relates to the
      expected mix of revenue; margins on the consulting
      services, which is likely to grow significantly faster than
      instrument sales, are narrower than on products. At
      Packard Instrument, we expect R&D growth to more
      closely resemble its revenue growth, compared with the
      36% increase we are estimating for 2000..Packard BioScience Co. – 16 May 2000

      Source: Packard BioScience Company; Merrill Lynch & Co. estimates. Excludes non-recurring items.
      [PBSC] MLPF&S was a manager of the most recent public offering of securities of this company within the last three years.
      [PBSC] The securities of the company are not listed but trade over-the-counter in the United States. In the US, retail sales and/or distribution of this report may be made only in states where these securities are exempt from
      registration or have been qualified for sale. MLPF&S or its affiliates usually make a market in the securities of this company.
      Opinion Key [X-a-b-c]: Investment Risk Rating(X): A - Low, B - Average, C - Above Average, D - High. Appreciation Potential Rating (a: Int. Term - 0-12 mo.; b: Long Term - >1 yr.): 1 - Buy, 2 - Accumulate, 3 - Neutral, 4 -Reduce,
      5 - Sell, 6 - No Rating. Income Rating(c): 7 - Same/Higher, 8 - Same/Lower, 9 - No Cash Dividend.
      Copyright 2000 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. This report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one of its
      affiliates and has been approved for publication in the United Kingdom by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Limited, which is regulated by SFA; has been considered and distributed in Australia by Merrill Lynch Equities
      (Australia) Limited (ACN 006 276 795), a licensed securities dealer under the Australian Corporations Law; is distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Ltd, which is regulated by the Hong Kong SFC; and is distributed
      in Singapore by Merrill Lynch International Bank Ltd (Merchant Bank) and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The information herein was obtained from various sources;
      we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Additional information available.
      Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities ("related investments").
      MLPF&S and its affiliates may trade for their own accounts as odd-lot dealer, market maker, block positioner, specialist and/or arbitrageur in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments, and may be on the opposite side
      of public orders. MLPF&S, its affiliates, directors, officers, employees and employee benefit programs may have a long or short position in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments. MLPF&S or its affiliates may from
      time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any entity mentioned in this report.
      This research report is prepared for general circulation and is circulated for general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific
      person who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that
      statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investors should note that income from such securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security’s price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive
      back less than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
      Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are influenced
      by the currency of the underlying security, effectively assume currency risk.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 30.07.00 21:00:40
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      hier sind weitere Infos

      Price: $11
      12 Month Price Objective: $15
      Estimates (Dec) 1999A 2000E 2001E
      EPS: $0.07 $0.13 $0.23
      P/E: 157.1x 84.6x 45.8x
      EPS Change (YoY): 85.7% 77.0%
      Q1 EPS (Mar): $0.03 $0.01
      Cash Flow/Share: $0.28 $0.29 $0.40
      Price/Cash Flow: 39.3x 37.9x 25.3x
      Dividend Rate: Nil Nil Nil
      Dividend Yield: Nil Nil Nil
      Opinion & Financial Data
      Investment Opinion: D-1-1-9
      Mkt. Value / Shares Outstanding (mn): $653.4 / 59.4
      Book Value/Share (Dec-1999): NM
      Price/Book Ratio: NM
      ROE 2000E Average: NM
      LT Liability % of Capital: 164%*
      Est. 5 Year EPS Growth: 30%
      Stock Data
      52-Week Range:
      Symbol / Exchange: PBSC / OTC
      Options: None
      Institutional Ownership-Spectrum: NA
      ML Industry Weightings & Ratings**
      Strategy; Weighting Rel. to Mkt.:
      Income: In Line (07-Mar-1995)
      Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
      Income & Growth: Overweight (07-Mar-1995)
      Capital Appreciation: Overweight (28-May-1993)
      Market Analysis; Technical Rating: Above Average (28-Mar-2000)
      **The views expressed are those of the macro department and do not
      necessarily coincide with those of the Fundamental analyst.
      For full investment opinion definitions, see footnotes.
      *12/31/99 value pro forma for 4/19/00 IPO.
      Investment Highlights:
      • We are initiating coverage of PBSC, a leading
      instrumentation supplier, with intermediate-and
      long-term Buy ratings. In its April 19
      IPO, it sold 12 million shares at $9.
      • PBSC’s valuation is attractive relative to such
      comparable companies as Waters or Agilent.
      We think the share price could double in the
      next 12-18 months, and the $15 midpoint
      would be a good starting point for a 12-month
      objective.
      • In our opinion, given the high leverage and
      limited float, PBSC is best suited for small
      cap, growth-oriented investors.
      Fundamental Highlights:
      • PBSC’s 4/19 IPO is a key evolutionary step.
      The ability to redirect the P&L from an LBO
      focus to a top line growth focus comes at an
      opportune time – at the early stages of ramp-up
      of applied genomics research and related
      disease and drug discovery.
      • PBSC’s acceleration in R&D should propel
      sales growth to the mid/high teens. Pretax
      margins should widen, reflecting lower
      interest expense; EPS growth should exceed
      30% at least for the next five years.
      Comment
      United States
      Process Controls
      15 May 2000
      Donna G. Takeda, CFA
      Director Packard BioScience Co.
      New Life for A Well-Established Supplier BUY
      Long Term
      BUY Reason for Report: Initial Opinion
      Merrill Lynch & Co.
      Global Securities Research & Economics Group
      Global Fundamental Equity Research Department
      RC#20113609
      Stock Performance
      8.8
      9.2
      9.6
      10.0
      10.4
      10.8
      11.2
      11.6
      12.0
      0.0062
      0.0064
      0.0066
      0.0068
      0.0070
      0.0072
      0.0074
      0.0076
      0.0078
      0.0080
      0.0082
      0.0084
      1997 1998 1999 2000
      Packard Bioscience Co.
      Rel to S&P Composite Index (500) (Right Scale)ഊPackard BioScience Co. – 15 May 2000
      (Continued)
      2
      Initiating Coverage of PBSC
      We are initiating coverage of Packard BioScience Co. with
      intermediate- and long-term Buy ratings. PBSC is a
      leading supplier of instruments, automation, consumables
      and services used in life sciences research and nuclear
      radiation detection. Sales in 1999 were $265 million. It has
      two principal subsidiaries: Packard Instrument, a leader in
      life science research tools (1999 revenue $159 million,
      60% of total); and Canberra Industries (1999 revenue $106
      million, 40% of total), the world’s leader in nuclear
      radiation detection. In 1997, the company leveraged its
      balance sheet in an ownership change. It has 1,446
      employees, and is headquartered in Meriden, CT.
      Upside – and Challenges
      REASONS TO BUY:
      Opportunity to participate in one of the world’s fastest
      growing markets through a leading supplier. Packard
      Instrument is a leading supplier of instruments,
      automation, and chemistries to high throughput drug
      discovery and genomics research. It has an installed base
      of 25,000 instruments, and 400 sales and service people
      around the world supporting its life sciences customers,
      which include the world’s 50 largest pharmaceutical and
      biotech companies, as well as major university and
      government research facilities.
      Accelerating growth: The combination of new products
      and new service capabilities for its existing installed base
      and new customers, as well as strong market growth
      should propel PBSC’s sales and EPS growth rates over the
      next five years to 20% and 30%+, respectively.
      Productivity: PBSC’s productivity-oriented solutions are
      appealing to customers as they search for faster, more
      productive, cost-effective analytical methods in life
      sciences market and nuclear radiation monitoring
      Improving capital structure provides flexibility: The
      reduction of debt with the IPO proceeds enables P&L
      focus to shift from interest expense to R&D and other
      growth-oriented initiatives.
      Seasoned management team: The management team has
      worked together for most of the time since Chairman/CEO
      Emery Olcott founded it in 1965.
      RISKS:
      Rapid pace of market changes with many emerging
      competitors: Research techniques in the drug discovery
      market, as well as genomics and proteomics research, are
      changing rapidly because of emerging developments in the
      research tool technologies—and attendant new suppliers.
      We think PBSC’s installed base, its excellent reputation
      with its customers, and its worldwide sales and service
      network provide it with significant competitive advantages
      against start-ups that lack these attributes.
      Nuclear market participation: The phrase “nuclear
      radiation” tends to carry a fair amount of emotional
      weight. However, we believe Canberra offers one of the
      more rational ways to think about this area. The best
      defense against problems at a nuclear facility is good
      monitoring and data analysis to ensure the safety of the
      facility. Canberra provides the enabling technology and
      service capability to do this.
      Leverage: The company’s interest expense and balance
      sheet reflect the high debt and low shareholders’ equity of
      the company’s leveraged recapitalization. However, cash
      flows are healthy, and the company could be debt-free if it
      sold Canberra.
      Newness as a U.S. public company: Managements of new
      public companies can have difficulty in adjusting to the
      focus on quarterly results. Packard, however, has been
      reporting on a quarterly basis since 1997. Further, because
      of the leverage, financial controls have been a major
      consideration in the operations of this company.
      Exposure to currency exchange rate trends: Two-thirds
      of sales are outside the U.S., so changes in exchange rates
      can exert a short-term impact on results. However, not all
      sales outside the U.S. are priced in local currencies; some
      priced in U.S. dollars. Also, the company has operating
      expenses and interest expense denominated in non-dollar
      currencies. The latter factors, plus some hedging of inter-company
      transactions, tend to reduce the currency impact.
      Limited float: Only the 12 million shares from the IPO, or
      approximately 15% of the total, are freely trading.
      IPO: the next step in the evolution
      Packard’s chairman and CEO Emery Olcott founded
      Canberra Industries in 1965. It acquired Packard
      Instrument from United Technologies in 1987. In 1997, the
      company changed its name to Packard BioScience, in
      recognition of the strategic direction it chose to take. The
      two businesses operate autonomously; the common ground
      is the top management and corporate infrastructure.
      At the time of the acquisition, Packard’s instrumentation
      focused on radioisotopic analytical techniques, which are a
      staple in life sciences research for such tasks as drug
      metabolism studies. But the life science market developed
      a preference for non-isotopic analysis, and Packard began
      to develop products using other detection methods.
      In 1997, Canberra bought back a significant equity stake
      held by the French government and issued $150 million of
      9.375% senior subordinated notes, due 3/31/07, in a public
      offering; also, Stonington Partners acquired 57.4% of the
      shares. The notes are redeemable beginning 3/1/02 at
      prices ranging from $104.688% to 100.000%. The
      company has been filing 10-Qs and 10-Ks with the SEC
      for the past three years. On April 19, 2000, PBSC
      completed its initial public offering, selling 12.0 million
      shares at $9.00 per share. Proceeds were approximately
      $114 million, with which the company expects to repayഊPackard BioScience Co. – 15 May 2000
      3
      $70 million of term loans and part of the revolving credit
      facility; increase R&D for new product development,
      enhancements to existing products, and strategic
      collaborations and acquisitions; and purchase its 9 3/8%
      senior subordinated notes in the open market.
      After the offering, Packard has 59.4 million shares
      outstanding, of which Stonington Partners controls 47.2%.
      On a fully diluted basis, Packard BioScience management
      owns about 12% of the shares. Total employee holdings
      are also significant. In addition to shares held in
      retirement plans, five PBSC top managers gave 100 shares
      to each employee, or 113,700 shares in aggregate (2% of
      total), from their personal holdings.
      PBSC has grown through internal developments,
      acquisitions, joint ventures, and collaborations. Its
      leveraged balance sheet of the past few years has
      precluded it from making any large acquisitions, but
      several small ones have nicely filled in gaps in the
      capabilities for both PI and CI. Both businesses have
      attractive opportunities, although clearly Packard
      Instrument is the company’s growth engine for the future.
      Packard Instrument
      Packard Instrument (PI) is a leading supplier of
      instruments, automation, consumables, and services for the
      life science research market. It has an installed base of
      25,000 instruments in 60 countries. More than ¾ of PI’s
      sales are to the drug discovery and genomics research
      markets. Customers include the 50 largest pharmaceutical
      and biotech companies, as well as many key university and
      government research labs. These customers are supported
      by more than 400 field sales and service personnel around
      the world. The company has been awarded approximately
      50 patents in the U.S. and other countries, and another 30
      patent applications are pending. PI is leveraging its
      strengths in miniaturization, automation and high-throughput
      screening across three principal platforms – in
      drug screening, genomics research, and biochips.
      An investment theme we have been emphasizing with the
      group we follow is to focus on companies that help
      customers become more productive. Packard is doing that
      for the high-throughput labs.
      We are getting close to the time when we will know the
      genetic makeup of the human being. In the next steps, we
      will begin to understand the genetic causes of disease, and
      how to treat or prevent them. Finding the links should keep
      the genetic researchers and drug companies busy for the
      next few decades. But a major obstacle between now and
      then is examining all of the possibilities in a productive,
      cost-effective manner. The scientist may be analyzing
      100,000 samples in a day, which requires a dramatically
      different way to perform the analysis—not just speeding
      up the old way, but actually finding more productive ways
      to get through the bottlenecks.
      Packard does this for its customers. Its capabilities span
      the range of the high throughput laboratory’s analysis
      requirements – from the robotics that enable you to handle
      the huge numbers of very small samples, to the
      instruments that initiate a reaction and then monitor and
      analyze the reaction, to the chemistry technologies that
      generate and characterize the reaction between target and
      possible drug compound. It combines its automation,
      miniaturization, detection and chemistry capabilities into
      modular, integrated solutions for its customers’ high
      throughput analysis problems.
      The big installed base of instruments and close, long-term
      customer relationships enable PI to keep an ear to the
      ground to hear clues about the market’s emerging
      requirements. For example, its TopCount instrument looks
      at each well in a microwell plate and discerns if a reaction
      has occurred in the test in that well. This was one of the
      world’s first high throughput screening instruments.
      Packard has sold 2,000 Topcounts since it was introduced
      in 1992.
      Another good example is the microfluidics capabilities.
      Packard’s piezo tip liquid handling system can dispense
      quantities as small as a nanoliter (one-billionth of a liter) in
      a microwell plate, on a biochip, or on a lab card. In
      addition to applications of this technology that it will sell
      on its own, PI is collaborating with Motorola (biochip
      technology) and with Aclara (lab card technology). PI’s
      BioSignal subsidiary is also using it in conjunction with
      such new chemistry technologies as ALPHA and BRET.
      Very few companies in the world can dispense quantities
      this small. This was recently released to the market and
      we think it could be a very important product for Packard.
      It is an extension of its traditional liquid handling
      capabilities.
      PI’s capabilities are used at all major steps in the drug
      discovery process – from genomics research to drug
      screening to lead optimization to pre-clinical testing and
      clinical trials. Over the years, Packard has extended its
      reach into new areas by building on their successes in
      adjacent spaces. It deploys similar technologies in
      screening and analysis to different parts of the drug
      discovery and development process.
      Canberra Industries
      Canberra is the world’s leading supplier of instruments and
      systems that detect, identify, quantify, and monitor
      radioactive materials for the nuclear industry and related
      markets. It also provides services related to the analysis of
      nuclear materials, including measurement, data review, site
      management and consulting services, as well as after-sale
      support, service and applications training for the
      instruments and systems that it sells. It has an installed
      base of $800 million of products. Canberra has nearly 200
      people in its worldwide sales and service organization.ഊPackard BioScience Co. – 15 May 2000
      4
      Its major customers include the U.S. Department of
      Energy and the major nuclear power plants around the
      world. Its traditional business has been the design and sale
      of the monitoring instruments. In recent years, it has
      begun to perform the monitoring services for its customers.
      This is proving to be a good growth opportunity for CI, as
      its customers elect to outsource the monitoring functions in
      order to downsize their organizations. Canberra does not
      take possession of the nuclear waste or process it in any
      way; it just measures and monitors the amount of nuclear
      radiation in its customers’ waste materials. The services
      business is likely to grow at a 20-25% rate over the next
      five years, while instrument sales grow 1%-2%. The rapid
      service growth reflects outsourcing opportunities with the
      Department of Energy and other customers.
      Over the years PBSC management team has carefully
      crafted two companies inside of Packard BioScience, each
      of which is a market leader in its respective field. Other
      than the constraints imposed by the leveraged balance
      sheet, each company has been nurtured appropriately,
      relative to its market growth and specific company
      opportunities. We think this is an important factor; in
      many instances, companies stop investing in businesses
      considered “cash cows”. Canberra has identified and
      developed important growth opportunities. We think these
      could be key attractions if Packard decides to sell
      Canberra. In the meantime, it is achieving respectable
      returns and producing good cash flows that can be invested
      in the whole company.
      The Financials
      We estimate PBSC’s sales to grow at a 15%-20% average
      annual rate over the next five years. This incorporates
      assumptions of 20%-25% growth for Packard Instrument,
      which was 60% of 1999 total sales and operating profits,
      and approximately 10% growth for Canberra Industries.
      By the end of the period, assuming PBSC continues to own
      Canberra, PI would account for approximately 75% of
      total sales and operating profits.
      In 2000, sales growth is likely to be in the low double
      digits before the impact of unfavorable currency exchange
      rate trends, or about 8% on a reported basis. The
      comparison is being affected by product lines that were
      sold or discontinued in 1999. In addition, the year-to-year
      comparison may not look as robust as prior periods
      because incremental sales from acquisitions boosted
      reported sales in 1998 and 1999.
      In 2000, we expect operating profits to be lower than the
      $31.8 million in 1999, mainly because of the increase in
      R&D expense. However, the pretax profit comparison
      should be favorable because of the decline in interest
      expense, as the company deploys a portion of its IPO
      proceeds to repay debt. Starting with 2001, operating
      profits should increase year-over-year; we estimate they
      should grow at a 29% rate in 2000-04. Interest expense
      should continue to decline, therefore pretax profits should
      grow faster than operating profits. Assuming the tax rate
      remains constant at 38% over the five-year horizon, EPS
      should grow at a rate in excess of 30%
      We estimate 2000 EPS at $0.13, vs. $0.07 in 1999; both
      years’ figures exclude non-recurring items. We look for
      sales in the $285-286 million range, with year-to-year
      comparisons improving as the year progresses. We
      estimate Q1 sales at $62.3 million, vs. $58.7 million, and
      EPS at $0.01, vs. $0.03. Higher R&D and interest expense
      are causing the tough earnings comparison. On a
      sequential basis, interest expense should begin to decline
      in Q1 as the company begins to deploy the proceeds of its
      April 19 IPO. However, the company is increasing its
      R&D expenses for new products that are getting close to
      the finish line, so EPS should be down year-to-year but
      above Q1.
      In 2001, we think sales should grow at a 13%-14% rate,
      largely driven by Packard Instrument’s new products and
      Canberra’s service business. Operating margins should
      widen (11.5% vs. 11.0%), after the R&D-related decline in
      2000 (11.0% vs. 12.0%). In the absence of acquisitions,
      interest expense should decline fairly dramatically in 2001
      (we estimate $12.1 million vs. $19.1 million) and EPS
      should nearly double, to $0.23 from the $0.13 we are
      estimating for 2000.
      Valuation Looks Attractive
      We think PBSC is very attractive at current levels,
      however, given the limited float and high debt/capital
      ratio, we think the shares are best suited for small cap,
      growth-oriented investors. At $11, PBSC’s 2001E P/E is
      1.52X our 30% 5-year EPS growth estimate, compared
      with 1.70X for Waters or 2.05X for Agilent Technologies.
      If PBSC could achieve 1.7X over the next-18 months, the
      share price would double. We think our initial $15
      midpoint is a good starting point for a 12-month objective.
      [WAT, A, PBSC] MLPF&S was a manager of the most recent public offering of securities of this company within the last three years.
      [A, PBSC] The securities of the company are not listed but trade over-the-counter in the United States. In the US, retail sales and/or distribution of this report may be made only in states where these securities are exempt from registration or have been qualified for sale.
      MLPF&S or its affiliates usually make a market in the securities of this company.
      Opinion Key [X-a-b-c]: Investment Risk Rating(X): A - Low, B - Average, C - Above Average, D - High. Appreciation Potential Rating (a: Int. Term - 0-12 mo.; b: Long Term - >1 yr.): 1 - Buy, 2 - Accumulate, 3 - Neutral, 4 - Reduce, 5 - Sell, 6 - No Rating. Income Rating(c):
      7 - Same/Higher, 8 - Same/Lower, 9 - No Cash Dividend.
      Copyright 2000 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S). All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. This report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one of its affiliates and has been approved for publication in
      the United Kingdom by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Limited, which is regulated by SFA; has been considered and distributed in Australia by Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited (ACN 006 276 795), a licensed securities dealer under the Australian Corporations
      Law; is distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Ltd, which is regulated by the Hong Kong SFC; and is distributed in Singapore by Merrill Lynch International Bank Ltd (Merchant Bank) and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which are regulated by the Monetary
      Authority of Singapore. The information herein was obtained from various sources; we do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Additional information available.
      Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options, futures or other derivatives related to such securities ("related investments"). MLPF&S and its affiliates may trade for their
      own accounts as odd-lot dealer, market maker, block positioner, specialist and/or arbitrageur in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments, and may be on the opposite side of public orders. MLPF&S, its affiliates, directors, officers, employees and employee benefit
      programs may have a long or short position in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments. MLPF&S or its affiliates may from time to time perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any entity mentioned in
      this report.
      This research report is prepared for general circulation and is circulated for general information only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors
      should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investors should note that income
      from such securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security’s price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
      Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are influenced by the currency of the underlying security,
      effectively assume currency risk.


      was haltet ihr davon?
      Avatar
      schrieb am 01.08.00 17:11:56
      Beitrag Nr. 5 ()
      Die Aktie ist super, bin auch drinne, beobachte sie schon lange, die 20 haben gehalten.
      Denke nach den earnings werden die ersten upgrades kommen.
      Mit den 80$ bis Dezember kann ich mitgehen.
      Biochips und deren demand-system ist genial.

      cu


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      PACKARD BIOSCIENCE. 3 AUGUST ZAHLEN.!!!! fusion