EFNT - Klage von US-Aktionären - - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[guilty]

@alle, die noch Efficient Networks halten

Habe heute ein interessantes SEC-Filing bzgl. EFNT entdeckt:

Reporting Owner files Form SC 14D9/A, Statement of Ownership:
Solicitation for EFFICIENT NETWORKS INC



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
SCHEDULE 14D-9

This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment No. 1") to Schedule 14D-9 amends the Schedule 14D-9
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 2, 2001 (the "Schedule
14D-9) by Efficient Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Efficient"), relating to the tender
offer commenced by Memphis Acquisition Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Siemens Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Siemens") and an indirect wholly
owned subsidiary of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, a corporation formed under the laws of the
Federal Republic of Germany ("Siemens AG"), on March 2, 2001 to purchase all of the outstanding
shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, of Efficient, at a price of $23.50 per share, net to the
sellers in cash, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase,
dated March 2, 2001, and the related Letter of Transmittal disclosed in a Tender Offer Statement
on Schedule TO, dated March 2, 2001, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as
set forth below:

ITEM 8. Additional Information

On February 23, 2001, a class action complaint was filed in the County Court of Dallas County in
the State of Texas, on behalf of a putative class of public stockholders of Efficient alleging causes
of action relating to the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The case is
encaptioned Josephine Greenleaf, et al. v. Efficient Networks, Inc., et al., Cause No. 01- 02132-D.
A copy of the complaint (the "Complaint") filed in connection with the aforementioned action is
filed as Exhibit 16 hereto and this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Complaint.
The defendants in the action include Efficient and its directors. The Complaint alleges, among other
things, that defendants breached (and are continuing to breach) their fiduciary duties to plaintiff and
other members of the putative class by entering into the Merger Agreement without first
undertaking procedures allegedly designed to maximize stockholder value. The plaintiff seeks,
among other things, to enjoin the defendants from proceeding with and consummating the Offer
and the Merger. Efficient believes that the class action is without merit, and intends to defend it
vigorously.

ITEM 9. Material To Be Filed As Exhibits

Exhibit 16. Complaint in Josephine Greenleaf, et al. v. Efficient Networks,
Inc., et al., Cause No. 01-02132-D, County Court of Dallas County
in the State of Texas (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99(d)(6) to the Schedule TO).

Die Übernahme durch Siemens ist also keineswegs durch.
Auch wenn Efficient die Chance der Klage herunterspielt, halte ich
es doch für möglich, dass Siemens sein Angebot noch mal nachbessern muss.
Wir wissen ja wie eigenwillig amerikanische Gerichte sein können. Vielleicht
schmeissen die einem deutschen Konzern gerne Knüppel zwischen die Beine
( siehe Probleme der Deutschen Telekom bei der Voicestream-Übernahme).

Also: Alles offen, lasst uns hoffen !

CU
guilty

[flo2323]

Lol ihr Efficent Networks Aktionäre seid wirklich nicht sehr clever!! Siemens zahlt fast 100% Aufschlag, wenn der Deal platzt ist Efficent Networks am ENDE.

[guilty]

@flo

1. Sind Efficient-Aktionäre grundsätzlich clever.
2. Spekuliere ich nicht auf ein Platzen des Deals, sondern
auf eine Erhöhung des Angebots oder eine Umwandlung in ein
Aktientausch-Angebot.
3. Danke, dass wenigstens du dem Thema ein wenig Aufmerksamkiet schenkst.

guilty

[Aktenvernichter]

Also ich habe den damaligen 80%igen Kursaufschlag
bei der Bekanntgabe mitgenommen.
Die Dynamik in diesem Wert ist weg.
Nichts mehr für mich.