LANGBAR ...... das war`s dann jetzt ? - 500 Beiträge pro Seite (Seite 7)
eröffnet am 25.11.05 17:12:40 von
neuester Beitrag 30.11.14 18:58:14 von
neuester Beitrag 30.11.14 18:58:14 von
Beiträge: 3.039
ID: 1.022.629
ID: 1.022.629
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 255.286
Gesamt: 255.286
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
| Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
|---|---|---|
| heute 18:36 | 8374 | |
| vor 43 Minuten | 6211 | |
| vor 32 Minuten | 5520 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 4182 | |
| vor 41 Minuten | 3556 | |
| vor 20 Minuten | 3551 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 3225 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 3122 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
| Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 3. | 18.159,50 | -0,16 | 204 | |||
| 2. | 5. | 181,78 | +14,92 | 116 | |||
| 3. | 4. | 2.341,21 | +0,15 | 61 | |||
| 4. | 6. | 7,9000 | +7,48 | 47 | |||
| 5. | 19. | 65,95 | -2,66 | 45 | |||
| 6. | 2. | 0,8300 | -29,66 | 42 | |||
| 7. | 39. | 15,116 | -5,73 | 35 | |||
| 8. | 33. | 0,1785 | -7,03 | 30 |
Feedback
ich hatte nach dem reverse split 3,01 aktien, davon wurden 3 umgetauscht in LIEF.ANSPR.A.CHESTER GROUP LTD QOXBN0005293.
die verbleibenden 0,01 stück wurden heute verkauft bzw. ausgebucht zum kurs 239,29 eur.
die daraus resultierenden 2,39 eur wurden aber gleich von spesen aufgefressen
die verbleibenden 0,01 stück wurden heute verkauft bzw. ausgebucht zum kurs 239,29 eur.
die daraus resultierenden 2,39 eur wurden aber gleich von spesen aufgefressen
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.454.876 von Nigenegg01 am 04.11.10 15:32:09Hallo,
ich habe, besser gesagt ich hatte 1,6 Anteile.
Davon ist mir Anfang der Woche ein Anteil ausgebucht worden.
Gestern habe ich dann festgstellt, dass die 0,6 Anteile auch futsch sind.
Nach Rücksprache mit meiner Bank wurden diese jetzt auch ausgebucht, und
ich werde Anfang kommender Woche sage ich schreibe ca.144,-Euro gut geschrieben
bekommen. Für die 1,0 Anteile waren es etwa 235,-Euro.
Von seinerzeit ca. 8000,-€ sind somit noch nicht mal 400,-€ übrig gebliebn.
Ich bin stinkesauer dass wir "Kleinaktionäre" wieder total verarscht wurden.
Da ich von einer Wahl (Tausch in Chester oder Auszahlung) nichts wusste, habe keine
Nachricht oder dergleichen erhalten, hieß es dann nach Rücksprache mit der
Anwaltskanzlei D.Wright in London, dass bei mir eine Auszahlung erfolgen würde.
Ich hatte eigentlich auch vor in Chester zu tauschen, aber wer weiss für was es gut ist. Diejenigen die in Chester getauscht haben wünsche viel Glück.
Weiss jemand, ob der Verlust steuerlich berücksichtigt werden kann ??????
Viele Grüsse
BS
ich habe, besser gesagt ich hatte 1,6 Anteile.
Davon ist mir Anfang der Woche ein Anteil ausgebucht worden.
Gestern habe ich dann festgstellt, dass die 0,6 Anteile auch futsch sind.
Nach Rücksprache mit meiner Bank wurden diese jetzt auch ausgebucht, und
ich werde Anfang kommender Woche sage ich schreibe ca.144,-Euro gut geschrieben
bekommen. Für die 1,0 Anteile waren es etwa 235,-Euro.
Von seinerzeit ca. 8000,-€ sind somit noch nicht mal 400,-€ übrig gebliebn.
Ich bin stinkesauer dass wir "Kleinaktionäre" wieder total verarscht wurden.
Da ich von einer Wahl (Tausch in Chester oder Auszahlung) nichts wusste, habe keine
Nachricht oder dergleichen erhalten, hieß es dann nach Rücksprache mit der
Anwaltskanzlei D.Wright in London, dass bei mir eine Auszahlung erfolgen würde.
Ich hatte eigentlich auch vor in Chester zu tauschen, aber wer weiss für was es gut ist. Diejenigen die in Chester getauscht haben wünsche viel Glück.
Weiss jemand, ob der Verlust steuerlich berücksichtigt werden kann ??????
Viele Grüsse
BS
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.468.071 von BlueSchip am 06.11.10 12:45:55Weiss jemand, ob der Verlust steuerlich berücksichtigt werden kann ??????
sollte so sein ...
sollte so sein ...
so kein einziges lgb im depot und das nach 5 jahren,wird mir schon ein bißchen
abgehen
.
spass beiseite,war schon eine riesenschweinerei was da abgegangen ist.
ich wünsche allen eine gute zukunft und ich habe aus dieser sache sicher gelernt.
lg andario
abgehen
.spass beiseite,war schon eine riesenschweinerei was da abgegangen ist.
ich wünsche allen eine gute zukunft und ich habe aus dieser sache sicher gelernt.
lg andario
Wird eigentlich die Chester Group irgendwo gehandelt, oder soll dies in "kürze" geschehen ???
Trading Spotlight
...die Chester Group wird derzeit an keiner Börse gehandelt, es ist auf absehbare Zeit auch noch nicht vorgesehen, der Horizont liegt vielmehr im Bereich von ca 3 bis 5 Jahren...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.487.124 von DerKleine_Prinz am 09.11.10 20:04:34also nochmal 5 J warten bis sich was tut .... einfach klasse diese Crown-Langbar-Chester-Connection .....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.487.124 von DerKleine_Prinz am 09.11.10 20:04:34...du wirst deine abfertigung sicher bekommen haben!!
Änderungen im Depot:
Langbar am Fr. 19.11.2010 ausgebucht
Chester am Mo. 22.11.2010 eingebucht im Verhältnis 1:1
Hier wurden zwei ISIN von Chester genannt - und ich habe noch eine andere - wie kommt dass?
Bei mir sind das CHESTER GROUP DEF. XF0009983606
Langbar am Fr. 19.11.2010 ausgebucht
Chester am Mo. 22.11.2010 eingebucht im Verhältnis 1:1
Hier wurden zwei ISIN von Chester genannt - und ich habe noch eine andere - wie kommt dass?
Bei mir sind das CHESTER GROUP DEF. XF0009983606
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.564.189 von Micha der II am 22.11.10 09:50:15Die verschiedenen WKNs sind nach Auskunft meines Brokers (ING-Diba) Platzhalter, denn die Chester-Aktien wurden noch nicht geliefert. In meinem Fall ist es so, dass Langbar die Aktien an den Nominee (Vidacos) geliefert hat, sie von dort allerdings noch nicht bei meinem Broker eingegangen sind. Da Langbar jetzt keine WKN mehr hat, haben die Banken diese Platzhalter eingegeben.
Position bis 31.12.2049 gesperrt ................
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 40.956.266 von newgame1 am 31.01.11 18:47:17wie .... 
alles dicht gemacht oder watt ......
alles dicht gemacht oder watt ......
Beim Tausch Langbar in Chester Group hätte ich doch mal besser das Geld genommen, oder gibts noch Hoffnung??
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 41.105.005 von jessie82 am 25.02.11 10:10:49...abwarten und Teetrinken, ...das wird schon...
!
Dieser Beitrag wurde moderiert.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 41.110.037 von DerKleine_Prinz am 25.02.11 21:01:05Ich hab den Eindruck, als ob ich hier schon viel zu lange Tee trinke...;-)
Aber mal im Ernst, wie schätzt Du den Zeithorizont bis zu einer Handelbarkeit der Chester-Aktie ein?
Aber mal im Ernst, wie schätzt Du den Zeithorizont bis zu einer Handelbarkeit der Chester-Aktie ein?
passiert denn überhaupt noch was hier ....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 41.571.714 von Elrond am 28.05.11 21:29:17neee.....
Ooops, habe erst jetzt gesehen, dass Ihr mal wieder was geschrieben habt...
...werde mich die nächsten Tage mal kundig machen, wie es aussieht, bzw wann und wie es weiter geht, habe auch seit einem halben Jahr keinen Kontakt mehr zu Langbar gehabt, werde diesen mal wieder auffrischen.
LG Euer kleiner Prinz
...werde mich die nächsten Tage mal kundig machen, wie es aussieht, bzw wann und wie es weiter geht, habe auch seit einem halben Jahr keinen Kontakt mehr zu Langbar gehabt, werde diesen mal wieder auffrischen.
LG Euer kleiner Prinz
Stuart Pearson für 1 Jahr in den Knast ........
Former Langbar chief jailed for fraud
Stuart Pearson misled investors over value of assets, six-year investigation by Serious Fraud Office finds
The former chief executive of the £357m shell company Langbar International, which collapsed six years ago leaving shareholders with big losses, has been sentenced to 12 months in jail and banned from being a company director for five years. The Serious Fraud Office said he was guilty of "fraud on a grand scale".
Stuart Pearson was found guilty on Monday on three counts of misleading investors by falsely claiming that the Aim-listed investment company, originally known as Crown Corporation, had assets held by Banco do Brasil and that some assets were being transferred to the company. A confiscation hearing will be held on 1 August.
After a six-year investigation, the SFO said these claims, made through official London stock market announcements in 2005 and personally to investors, were designed to paint the company as an attractive investment.
Hundreds of institutional and private investors, including Merrill Lynch and Gartmore, lost millions of pounds after investing in the company, attracted by the £357m of cash Pearson said was sitting in accounts in Brazil and the Netherlands.
SFO director Richard Alderman said: "This was fraud on a grand scale with scant regard for the essential integrity of the financial markets or for the inevitable losses and misery caused to the investors. Our investigators have worked closely with the City of London police and the Spanish authorities in what has been a painstaking investigation."
No other people have been charged by the SFO.
Crown was founded by Mariusz Rybak in 2003 and described itself as a business that bought underperforming companies, turning them around and selling them at a profit. The Bermuda-based firm floated on Aim that year but the shares fell following a series of deals and it held a rights issue.
Pearson, a chartered accountant and former partner with Baker Tilly, joined Crown as chief executive in 2005. The company took over Pearson's firm, Langbar Capital, and renamed itself Langbar International.
Trading in the shares was suspended in 2006 after Rybak, who had resigned as executive chairman, made £2.5m from share sales and the company said it could not "establish the existence of nor verify its entitlement to any of the [bank deposits] at any time in the company's history".
Rybak agreed to pay the company £30m in 2008 to settle a civil recovery lawsuit, and was ordered by the judge to sell his home in Monaco. Langbar's former financial adviser, Nabarro Wells, which floated the company on Aim, was fined £250,000 by the London Stock Exchange in 2007 and publicly censured for breaching the exchange's rules.
Former Langbar chief jailed for fraud
Stuart Pearson misled investors over value of assets, six-year investigation by Serious Fraud Office finds
The former chief executive of the £357m shell company Langbar International, which collapsed six years ago leaving shareholders with big losses, has been sentenced to 12 months in jail and banned from being a company director for five years. The Serious Fraud Office said he was guilty of "fraud on a grand scale".
Stuart Pearson was found guilty on Monday on three counts of misleading investors by falsely claiming that the Aim-listed investment company, originally known as Crown Corporation, had assets held by Banco do Brasil and that some assets were being transferred to the company. A confiscation hearing will be held on 1 August.
After a six-year investigation, the SFO said these claims, made through official London stock market announcements in 2005 and personally to investors, were designed to paint the company as an attractive investment.
Hundreds of institutional and private investors, including Merrill Lynch and Gartmore, lost millions of pounds after investing in the company, attracted by the £357m of cash Pearson said was sitting in accounts in Brazil and the Netherlands.
SFO director Richard Alderman said: "This was fraud on a grand scale with scant regard for the essential integrity of the financial markets or for the inevitable losses and misery caused to the investors. Our investigators have worked closely with the City of London police and the Spanish authorities in what has been a painstaking investigation."
No other people have been charged by the SFO.
Crown was founded by Mariusz Rybak in 2003 and described itself as a business that bought underperforming companies, turning them around and selling them at a profit. The Bermuda-based firm floated on Aim that year but the shares fell following a series of deals and it held a rights issue.
Pearson, a chartered accountant and former partner with Baker Tilly, joined Crown as chief executive in 2005. The company took over Pearson's firm, Langbar Capital, and renamed itself Langbar International.
Trading in the shares was suspended in 2006 after Rybak, who had resigned as executive chairman, made £2.5m from share sales and the company said it could not "establish the existence of nor verify its entitlement to any of the [bank deposits] at any time in the company's history".
Rybak agreed to pay the company £30m in 2008 to settle a civil recovery lawsuit, and was ordered by the judge to sell his home in Monaco. Langbar's former financial adviser, Nabarro Wells, which floated the company on Aim, was fined £250,000 by the London Stock Exchange in 2007 and publicly censured for breaching the exchange's rules.
Aftermath of Langbar’s $800M fraud
Only one former executive is doing jail time, and his sin was to lie in a press release. Meanwhile, the company lives on in Bermuda
By James Bagnall, The Ottawa Citizen July 15, 2011
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Aftermath+Langbar+800M+fra…
Mariusz Rybak, a Polish-born, former Ottawa entrepreneur, now lives in a luxury apartment in Monaco.
OTTAWA — When we last left former Ottawa entrepreneur Mariusz Rybak, he was in London, defending himself against the charge he had orchestrated one of the largest frauds ever seen on a British stock exchange.
The civil trial involving his company, Langbar International, stretched over several months in late 2007 and early 2008, offering bizarre bits of evidence that frequently left the judge shaking his head in disbelief.
Then, abruptly, Rybak settled. He and his wife Izabela acknowledged no guilt but agreed to pay some $60 million to Langbar, under new management since late 2005.
This was the firm Rybak co-launched in 2003, whose balance sheet turned out to have been supported by faked financial instruments. Rybak said he had been duped by the investor who provided the funds.
The $60 million settlement represented nearly all the Rybak family’s wealth — most of it generated by the sale of shares in Langbar.
It turns out the story did not end with the settlement.
While the order signed by Justice Sir William Anthony Blackburne allowed the Rybaks to retain their apartment in their native Poland and other assets, it compelled them to sell their luxury apartment in Monaco. If the Rybaks got a good price for their apartment, the deal specified, more money would be owed to Langbar. They did and it was.
Nevertheless, the company had to chase the Rybaks back into court to collect it.
Last summer the High Court in London held in Langbar’s favour and ordered the Rybaks to hand over 5.9 million euros. The majority of this has been recovered by Langbar.
Yet, despite his central role in Langbar’s history, Rybak today seems almost an afterthought in this bizarre saga.
Despite a six-year-long criminal investigation by Britain’s Serious Fraud Office, not to mention the size of the fraud — some $800 million in Langbar’s assets were faked — no one has been convicted of fraud. Nor is it likely anyone will be. The Serious Fraud Office last month washed its hands of the whole affair following the criminal trial of Stuart Pearson — the chartered accountant who succeeded Rybak as Langbar CEO in June 2005.
Pearson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail, not for fraud, but for three counts of misleading the stock market about the value of the assets held by Langbar.
The Serious Fraud Office noted in a statement that Pearson issued press announcements in September 2005 “which he knew to be misleading, false or deceptive or was reckless in issuing them.” In particular, Pearson falsely claimed that the firm had successfully negotiated the transfer of cash deposits from South America to Langbar accounts in Holland.
Pearson’s announcements that Langbar’s assets were real naturally pushed up the value of the company’s stock. Rybak, meantime, was unloading his shares, generating tens of millions in personal profit along the way. Lambert, too, sold millions of shares during this period.
During his civil trial, Rybak maintained he had no reason to doubt the authenticity of the financial assets that underpinned Langbar’s share price. He had hired many advisers and auditors, none of whom spotted the fraud.
Rybak advanced the theory at trial that the main perpetrator had been Avi Arad, the Argentine-born businessman who acted on behalf of Langbar’s main investor, Lambert Financial.
Arad through Lambert initially provided more than 200 million euros for a minority stake in Langbar. However, he paid for it with a certificate of deposit which, according to the Serious Fraud Office “was false and worthless and the principal directors of (Langbar) had been informed it was worthless.”
Arad denied that he acted fraudulently.
Rybak, in his witness statement at the 2008 civil trial Rybak said that “none of Langbar’s professional advisers advised me that the 2003 CD was or might be a forgery.”
Arad, a large and boisterous personality, had contacts everywhere — in Argentina, Brazil, Israel and Spain, where his business interests appeared to have been concentrated.
He was one of six people arrested and interviewed in Spain early in 2009 in connection with the Langbar fraud. Two others were auditors who advised Arad on matters connected with Langbar. Another was the former chief financial officer of Lambert. The fifth had been a close associate of Mario Conde, currently serving time for a major Spanish banking fraud. A former Spanish policeman was also arrested.
All six were soon released without charge.
A key factor in the investigation may have been the death in 2009 of Arad at his home in Barcelona. Attention turned to Rybak’s successor, Stuart Pearson, who was arrested and interviewed in April 2009, then charged a year later with making misleading statements to the market. Following Pearson’s guilty verdict last month, Serious Fraud Office Director Richard Alderman noted: “Our investigators have worked closely with the city of London Police and the Spanish authorities in what has been a painstaking investigation. I am very pleased that our hard work has brought an offender to justice.”
One, it appears, who was a secondary figure in this drama.
This leaves the question of what happened to Langbar and the money it recouped from Rybak, Lambert and others. Following the discovery of fraud late in 2005, the company was put under the management of David Buchler, a corporate turnaround specialist. The most recent Langbar balance sheets show the firm took in 30.4 million British pounds in 2008, nearly all of it proceeds from the Rybak settlement. However, Langbar the same year spent a breathtaking 14.6 million pounds on administrative and legal expenses, much of it related to tracking down money and launching litigations in half-a-dozen countries.
By the end of June last year, less than eight million British pounds remained in the firm’s accounts.
Buchler, now chairman of Templewood — a merchant bank based in London — declined to offer details about how the money was spent.
Langbar, too, is moving on. The firm created a new structure last fall using a new Bermuda holding company, Chester Group. Langbar merged with a Chester subsidiary and will keep the name Langbar International. The subsidiary will deal exclusively with what it calls historic issues and future litigation, while the holding company will pursue potential joint ventures under the Chester Group banner.
This is in line with the strategy Rybak had in mind in 2003 when he first established Langbar (then known as Crown Corp.). His idea was to invest in under-performing companies, fix them up and sell them for a profit. He had been seeking $10 million to $20 million in startup capital. Then Arad showed up with what seemed a mountain of cash.
Those fraudulent assets provided the basis for tens of millions of dollars worth of share sales, whose proceeds now secure the balance sheet of Chester Group.
This is another peculiar legacy of Langbar. The money used by Chester Group to make its first investments, assuming these actually occur, will be proceeds of the fraud. Which is to say, it could one day be put to good use.
But Chester Group’s new managers will have to work very hard to overcome Langbar’s poisonous legacy.
jbagnall@ottawacitizen.com
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
Only one former executive is doing jail time, and his sin was to lie in a press release. Meanwhile, the company lives on in Bermuda
By James Bagnall, The Ottawa Citizen July 15, 2011
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Aftermath+Langbar+800M+fra…
Mariusz Rybak, a Polish-born, former Ottawa entrepreneur, now lives in a luxury apartment in Monaco.
OTTAWA — When we last left former Ottawa entrepreneur Mariusz Rybak, he was in London, defending himself against the charge he had orchestrated one of the largest frauds ever seen on a British stock exchange.
The civil trial involving his company, Langbar International, stretched over several months in late 2007 and early 2008, offering bizarre bits of evidence that frequently left the judge shaking his head in disbelief.
Then, abruptly, Rybak settled. He and his wife Izabela acknowledged no guilt but agreed to pay some $60 million to Langbar, under new management since late 2005.
This was the firm Rybak co-launched in 2003, whose balance sheet turned out to have been supported by faked financial instruments. Rybak said he had been duped by the investor who provided the funds.
The $60 million settlement represented nearly all the Rybak family’s wealth — most of it generated by the sale of shares in Langbar.
It turns out the story did not end with the settlement.
While the order signed by Justice Sir William Anthony Blackburne allowed the Rybaks to retain their apartment in their native Poland and other assets, it compelled them to sell their luxury apartment in Monaco. If the Rybaks got a good price for their apartment, the deal specified, more money would be owed to Langbar. They did and it was.
Nevertheless, the company had to chase the Rybaks back into court to collect it.
Last summer the High Court in London held in Langbar’s favour and ordered the Rybaks to hand over 5.9 million euros. The majority of this has been recovered by Langbar.
Yet, despite his central role in Langbar’s history, Rybak today seems almost an afterthought in this bizarre saga.
Despite a six-year-long criminal investigation by Britain’s Serious Fraud Office, not to mention the size of the fraud — some $800 million in Langbar’s assets were faked — no one has been convicted of fraud. Nor is it likely anyone will be. The Serious Fraud Office last month washed its hands of the whole affair following the criminal trial of Stuart Pearson — the chartered accountant who succeeded Rybak as Langbar CEO in June 2005.
Pearson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail, not for fraud, but for three counts of misleading the stock market about the value of the assets held by Langbar.
The Serious Fraud Office noted in a statement that Pearson issued press announcements in September 2005 “which he knew to be misleading, false or deceptive or was reckless in issuing them.” In particular, Pearson falsely claimed that the firm had successfully negotiated the transfer of cash deposits from South America to Langbar accounts in Holland.
Pearson’s announcements that Langbar’s assets were real naturally pushed up the value of the company’s stock. Rybak, meantime, was unloading his shares, generating tens of millions in personal profit along the way. Lambert, too, sold millions of shares during this period.
During his civil trial, Rybak maintained he had no reason to doubt the authenticity of the financial assets that underpinned Langbar’s share price. He had hired many advisers and auditors, none of whom spotted the fraud.
Rybak advanced the theory at trial that the main perpetrator had been Avi Arad, the Argentine-born businessman who acted on behalf of Langbar’s main investor, Lambert Financial.
Arad through Lambert initially provided more than 200 million euros for a minority stake in Langbar. However, he paid for it with a certificate of deposit which, according to the Serious Fraud Office “was false and worthless and the principal directors of (Langbar) had been informed it was worthless.”
Arad denied that he acted fraudulently.
Rybak, in his witness statement at the 2008 civil trial Rybak said that “none of Langbar’s professional advisers advised me that the 2003 CD was or might be a forgery.”
Arad, a large and boisterous personality, had contacts everywhere — in Argentina, Brazil, Israel and Spain, where his business interests appeared to have been concentrated.
He was one of six people arrested and interviewed in Spain early in 2009 in connection with the Langbar fraud. Two others were auditors who advised Arad on matters connected with Langbar. Another was the former chief financial officer of Lambert. The fifth had been a close associate of Mario Conde, currently serving time for a major Spanish banking fraud. A former Spanish policeman was also arrested.
All six were soon released without charge.
A key factor in the investigation may have been the death in 2009 of Arad at his home in Barcelona. Attention turned to Rybak’s successor, Stuart Pearson, who was arrested and interviewed in April 2009, then charged a year later with making misleading statements to the market. Following Pearson’s guilty verdict last month, Serious Fraud Office Director Richard Alderman noted: “Our investigators have worked closely with the city of London Police and the Spanish authorities in what has been a painstaking investigation. I am very pleased that our hard work has brought an offender to justice.”
One, it appears, who was a secondary figure in this drama.
This leaves the question of what happened to Langbar and the money it recouped from Rybak, Lambert and others. Following the discovery of fraud late in 2005, the company was put under the management of David Buchler, a corporate turnaround specialist. The most recent Langbar balance sheets show the firm took in 30.4 million British pounds in 2008, nearly all of it proceeds from the Rybak settlement. However, Langbar the same year spent a breathtaking 14.6 million pounds on administrative and legal expenses, much of it related to tracking down money and launching litigations in half-a-dozen countries.
By the end of June last year, less than eight million British pounds remained in the firm’s accounts.
Buchler, now chairman of Templewood — a merchant bank based in London — declined to offer details about how the money was spent.
Langbar, too, is moving on. The firm created a new structure last fall using a new Bermuda holding company, Chester Group. Langbar merged with a Chester subsidiary and will keep the name Langbar International. The subsidiary will deal exclusively with what it calls historic issues and future litigation, while the holding company will pursue potential joint ventures under the Chester Group banner.
This is in line with the strategy Rybak had in mind in 2003 when he first established Langbar (then known as Crown Corp.). His idea was to invest in under-performing companies, fix them up and sell them for a profit. He had been seeking $10 million to $20 million in startup capital. Then Arad showed up with what seemed a mountain of cash.
Those fraudulent assets provided the basis for tens of millions of dollars worth of share sales, whose proceeds now secure the balance sheet of Chester Group.
This is another peculiar legacy of Langbar. The money used by Chester Group to make its first investments, assuming these actually occur, will be proceeds of the fraud. Which is to say, it could one day be put to good use.
But Chester Group’s new managers will have to work very hard to overcome Langbar’s poisonous legacy.
jbagnall@ottawacitizen.com
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
Weiss jemand etwas neues bzl. der Chester Group?. Gibts da Zahlen oder eine aussagekräftige Homepage? Werden die Aktien irgendwann mal gehandelt?
Neverending Story:
Withers' bid to take client money dispute to Supreme Court rejected
11 April 2012 | By Katy Dowell
http://www.thelawyer.com/withers-bid-to-take-client-money-di…
Gruß!
Daytrader12
Withers' bid to take client money dispute to Supreme Court rejected
11 April 2012 | By Katy Dowell
http://www.thelawyer.com/withers-bid-to-take-client-money-di…
Gruß!
Daytrader12
Hier passiert doch eh nichts mehr...
ist noch jmd hier irgendwie aktiv ....
Ich schaue hier sporadisch mal rein. Vielleicht tut sich ja doch mal was. Die Hoffnung stirbt schließlich zuletzt.
Hat eigentlich die ach so tolle Chester Group ne Homepage? Ich kann leider nichts finden.
Hat eigentlich die ach so tolle Chester Group ne Homepage? Ich kann leider nichts finden.
Hallo,
als "stolze" Chester Group Aktionär kann ich die nur passiv
in meinem Depot sehen. Anders gefragt: was oder wie kann man da aktiv sein?
als "stolze" Chester Group Aktionär kann ich die nur passiv
in meinem Depot sehen. Anders gefragt: was oder wie kann man da aktiv sein?
...bin nächste Woche in London und werde mal den aktuellen Status überprüfen bzw mal sehen, was es neues gibt.
Und wie ist es in London gelaufen?
Gibt es was neues?
Gibt es was neues?
Hallo,
Wie ist es in London gelaufen?
Gibt´s was neues?
Wie ist es in London gelaufen?
Gibt´s was neues?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 46.742.341 von Micha der II am 01.04.14 08:17:32Hallo Micha,
...tja der DerKleinePrinz hat genau wie wie jeder Langbar-Aktionär keine Kohle mehr für ein Ticket und den Flieger...auf die Insel
. Woher sollen da diesbezüglich neue Infos kommen ?
...tja der DerKleinePrinz hat genau wie wie jeder Langbar-Aktionär keine Kohle mehr für ein Ticket und den Flieger...auf die Insel
. Woher sollen da diesbezüglich neue Infos kommen ?
Bei mir würde in der letzten Woche meine Chester Group Aktie ungefragt wertlos aus dem Depot ausgebucht. Hat noch jemand diese Erfahrung gemacht?
Gibt es die Firma nicht mehr???
Gibt es die Firma nicht mehr???
Yup- Depotbereinigung, war offenbar nichts mehr wert...
meine sind komplett gelöscht worden bei der IngDiBa
AUSBUCHUNG CHESTERGROUP Wertpapiere
Servus Jungs, sorry das ich mich jetzt erst melde, ich habe auch gerade in meinem Depot nachgeschaut und musste feststellen, dass 50 meiner CHESTER GROUP Aktien ausgebucht wurden, allerdings 2 CHESTER GROUP Aktien, die ich wohl in UK gekauft hatte, die also eine andere Verwahrart hatten, nicht ausgebucht wurden. Ich war anfang des Jahres in London und hatte mich mit David Buchler getroffen, um mal zum aktuellen Stand Informationen zu bekommen, daraufhin erklärte er mir, das die CHESTER GROUP einen neuen Vorstand habe und alle Informationen über das Internet abrufbar seien.
Die CHESTER GROUP hat auch eine Homepage unter http://chestergroup.bm/ . Desweiteren zeigte er mir einen Katalog mit Bildern, die die CHESTER GROUP erworben habe und deren Werthaltigkeit nun wohl angeblich steigen würde. Das Geschäftsmodell liege nun auf dem Handel bzw der Wertsteigerung von Kunst und Malereigegenständen. Auf meien Einwand, dass ich für die Webseite des Unternehmens kein Login habe, entgegnete er, dass er sich darum kümmern würde, dass ich ein solches bekomme.
Bis heute habe ich kein LOGIN erhalten und es kommen bei mir so einige Fragen und Zweifel bezüglich der Seriösität und Rechtschaffenheit des Gebildes der CHESTER GROUP Limited.
Nachdem ich im großen Stil Geld verloren hatte ist es eigentlich nicht sinnvoll, schlechtem Geld noch ein gutes hinterher zu werfen, allerdings würde ich mich um eine Recherche und anwaltliche Beratung kümmern, wenn noch andere Aktionäre mitmachen würden. Hierfür einfach mit mir in Kontakt treten.
Ich habe anbei folgende Unternehmensdaten zusammengefasst:
Kontaktdaten des Unternehmens:
CHESTER GROUP LIMITED
Mercury House
101 Front Street
Hamilton, HM12
Bermuda
P.O. Box HM 187
Hamilton HM AX
Tel: (+1-441)-295-1011
Facsimile: (+1-441)-295-3225
Bermuda company number: 44466
Status in general: ACTIVE
Registration date: 2010-07-22
Website: http://chestergroup.bm/
Ich werde nun mal ein wenig recherchieren und wer will, kann sich gerne an mich wenden.
Gruß
Euer kleiner Prinz
...anbei der Link zur Gemäldesammlung, die angeblich uns Langbar Aktionären gehört:
www.chestercollections.com
www.chestercollections.com
da wird wohl weiterhin gelogen und betrogen ......
DurchsuchenBeitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 204 | ||
| 116 | ||
| 61 | ||
| 47 | ||
| 45 | ||
| 42 | ||
| 35 | ||
| 30 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 28 |
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 18 | ||
| 18 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 17 | ||
| 16 | ||
| 13 | ||
| 13 |
