NTV live Roger Honet : US OELkonzerne teilen den Irak schon auf ! - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 17.09.02 23:13:18 von
neuester Beitrag 05.07.03 15:34:45 von
neuester Beitrag 05.07.03 15:34:45 von
Beiträge: 30
ID: 634.521
ID: 634.521
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 1.029
Gesamt: 1.029
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
| Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
|---|---|---|
| vor 1 Stunde | 8451 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 4490 | |
| vor 37 Minuten | 4014 | |
| vor 38 Minuten | 1868 | |
| vor 39 Minuten | 1729 | |
| heute 13:28 | 1619 | |
| heute 15:19 | 1465 | |
| vor 56 Minuten | 1410 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
| Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 2. | 6,3740 | -0,65 | 83 | |||
| 2. | 1. | 18.682,21 | -0,31 | 77 | |||
| 3. | 4. | 9,9000 | -4,07 | 63 | |||
| 4. | 21. | 9,5900 | +0,63 | 62 | |||
| 5. | 3. | 166,80 | -2,96 | 60 | |||
| 6. | 8. | 2.389,95 | -1,27 | 35 | |||
| 7. | 9. | 0,1587 | +1,41 | 29 | |||
| 8. | 31. | 0,0107 | 0,00 | 28 |
Feedback
Eine Unverschämtheit, die Araber
werden Antworten
werden Antworten
Die USA werden der Schurkenstaat des 21. Jahrhunderts. Ohne Öl können sie ihre riesige Armee vergessen, ihre Infrastruktur, einfach alles (das kommt davon, wenn man immer noch Autos mit 20 Liter/100 km verkauft und Benzin nur gering besteuert). Und so ein korrupter Ex-Ölbaron wie Bush weiss natürlich, daß er mit den Vorkommen im Irak erstmal genug Öl hätte.
....die ganze Welt ist beruhigt, das der Irakkonflikt eine positive Kehrtwende genommen hat, außer der Kriegstreiber Bush mit seinem engl. Fo...lecker Blair.
Denen geht es garnicht um eine Lösung, die wollen ihren alten Kriegsschrott los werden und sich die Ölvorkommen sichern. Tja, alle Index. im grünen Bereich, bis diese Heuchler in den Staaten aufmachen. Wer schützt uns vor den Schergen aus den USA....?
Denen geht es garnicht um eine Lösung, die wollen ihren alten Kriegsschrott los werden und sich die Ölvorkommen sichern. Tja, alle Index. im grünen Bereich, bis diese Heuchler in den Staaten aufmachen. Wer schützt uns vor den Schergen aus den USA....?
Dieser M B S ist ein von Müntefering besoldeter Typ der Kategorie *arbeitslos- und Spaß dabei*, welcher in Wahlkampfzeiten 14 Stunden vor der Glotze hängt, sich ein paar SPD-Groschen verdient und ansonsten permanent bestätigt, das er auf dem Arbeitsmarkt keine Chance hat.
Geht Dir Dein hirnloses Gesabbel nicht langsam selbst auf den Keks, Du Seher?
Geht Dir Dein hirnloses Gesabbel nicht langsam selbst auf den Keks, Du Seher?
#4 dir werden sie auch noch die augen öffnen, du depp!
Trading Spotlight
MBS,
Du wirst immer besser: hefte Dir den Schimpf getrost als Orden für gute Leistungen an!
Du wirst immer besser: hefte Dir den Schimpf getrost als Orden für gute Leistungen an!
Aber echt, jetzt mal ohne Spass.
Mir ist es vollkommen unverständlich warum die Amis und Engländer dem S. Hussein nicht vertrauen. Dabei ist der doch echt die Zuverlässigkeit in Person. Der hat doch in den letzen Jahren wirklich immer so gut mit der UNO zusammengearbeitet. Gut ab und an gab es mal ein kleines Missverständniss aber das waren meistens Sprachprobleme, da man keine Übersetzer hatte.
Mir ist es vollkommen unverständlich warum die Amis und Engländer dem S. Hussein nicht vertrauen. Dabei ist der doch echt die Zuverlässigkeit in Person. Der hat doch in den letzen Jahren wirklich immer so gut mit der UNO zusammengearbeitet. Gut ab und an gab es mal ein kleines Missverständniss aber das waren meistens Sprachprobleme, da man keine Übersetzer hatte.
oh bertel ... darum gehts doch gar nicht ... hast du das denn immer noch nicht verstanden?
ganz einfach: keine Cola, kein MacDonald, kein Ford oder Opel und außer Marlboro gibt es ja auch andere Marken...
Doch, ich habe sehr wohl verstanden um was es geht. Aber was M_B_S hier abzieht finde ich lächerlich.
Ich begrüße es sehr, daß Hussein nun wieder Inspekteure ins Land lassen will und bin auch der Meinung man sollte diese Option nutzen. Aber deshalb müssen die militärischen Vorbereitungen trotzdem fortgeführt werden um den Druck aufrecht zu erhalten.
Oder kannst du mir einen Diktator in der Geschichte nennen bei dem Verhandlungen zum Erfolg führten?
Ich begrüße es sehr, daß Hussein nun wieder Inspekteure ins Land lassen will und bin auch der Meinung man sollte diese Option nutzen. Aber deshalb müssen die militärischen Vorbereitungen trotzdem fortgeführt werden um den Druck aufrecht zu erhalten.
Oder kannst du mir einen Diktator in der Geschichte nennen bei dem Verhandlungen zum Erfolg führten?
Bertel,
erst nach den Terroranschlägen sahen sich CIA und US-Army gemüßigt, endlich die fehlenden Arabischen Dolmetscher anzuheuern!
Als Good`s own nation brauchte man so etwas eben nicht;
stimmt schon was du sagt
erst nach den Terroranschlägen sahen sich CIA und US-Army gemüßigt, endlich die fehlenden Arabischen Dolmetscher anzuheuern!
Als Good`s own nation brauchte man so etwas eben nicht;
stimmt schon was du sagt
Wie sagte Bin Laden es noch die USA stehlen unser OEL !
Hat er recht damit ?
@ Bertel73
Wie kommt es nur , dass die Arabische Welt den USA nicht über den Weg trauen ?
Ist doch das Einhalten von UNO Resolutionen des engsten Verbündeten der USA in der Region Israel
vorbildlich....
Hat er recht damit ?
@ Bertel73
Wie kommt es nur , dass die Arabische Welt den USA nicht über den Weg trauen ?
Ist doch das Einhalten von UNO Resolutionen des engsten Verbündeten der USA in der Region Israel
vorbildlich....
#2
die haben selbst Reserver an Öl im eigenem Land für Später jetzt is es halt billiger im Nahen Osten
die haben selbst Reserver an Öl im eigenem Land für Später jetzt is es halt billiger im Nahen Osten
Leider habe ich die Befürchtung das Bush mit seinem Weg einen dritten Weltkrieg beginnt.
Wer glaubt die Arabischen Staaten lassen das Öl Bush und seiner Industrie, sieht die Lage leider sehr einseitig.
Bush ist leider krank´und Stoiber erkennt dieses leider nicht und läuft hinterher.
Ich kann nur hoffen das man Bush hilft, das beste wäre Tritt zurück.
Gutes Beispiel es gab keinen Staat der soviel Menschen in die Todeszelle geschickt hat wie in Texas.
Man kann nur hoffen das Bush endlich die Probleme im eigene Land löst.
Grüße
Andue
Wer glaubt die Arabischen Staaten lassen das Öl Bush und seiner Industrie, sieht die Lage leider sehr einseitig.
Bush ist leider krank´und Stoiber erkennt dieses leider nicht und läuft hinterher.
Ich kann nur hoffen das man Bush hilft, das beste wäre Tritt zurück.
Gutes Beispiel es gab keinen Staat der soviel Menschen in die Todeszelle geschickt hat wie in Texas.
Man kann nur hoffen das Bush endlich die Probleme im eigene Land löst.
Grüße
Andue
@M_B_S
Ich möchte hier auch nicht sagen das die USA ohne Fehl und Tadel sind, aber ich glaube einfach das man Saddam nur zur Vernunft bringt wenn man den Druck aufrecht erhält.
Was Israel angeht, da fällt mir wirklich nichts ein was man dazu sagen soll. Ich hoffe, das dieser Konflikt nicht so endet wie ich es befürchte. Nämlich nie!
Ich möchte hier auch nicht sagen das die USA ohne Fehl und Tadel sind, aber ich glaube einfach das man Saddam nur zur Vernunft bringt wenn man den Druck aufrecht erhält.
Was Israel angeht, da fällt mir wirklich nichts ein was man dazu sagen soll. Ich hoffe, das dieser Konflikt nicht so endet wie ich es befürchte. Nämlich nie!
oh bertel ... wo lebst du denn?
da, wo man dem sadam den kopf abschlägt, wachsen sofort 3 neue
die usa unterstützen im moment ihren totfeind von übermorgen
das gehirn der bushs halbiert sich bei jeder vererbung
usw.
und du kümmerst dich um schröders und stoibers?
da, wo man dem sadam den kopf abschlägt, wachsen sofort 3 neue
die usa unterstützen im moment ihren totfeind von übermorgen
das gehirn der bushs halbiert sich bei jeder vererbung
usw.
und du kümmerst dich um schröders und stoibers?
@sosolalaa
Dann erkläre mir doch bitte wie eine "vernünftige" Lösung aussieht.
PS. ....wo lebst du denn?
Dann erkläre mir doch bitte wie eine "vernünftige" Lösung aussieht.
PS. ....wo lebst du denn?
ich lebe in der realität!
die lösung aus meiner sicht wäre: ein amerikanischer amokläufer erschiesst bush und sadam + einiges, was man wohl besser nicht schreibt.
hast du dir schon mal überlegt, dass bush auch nur durch eine art putsch an die macht kam?
die lösung aus meiner sicht wäre: ein amerikanischer amokläufer erschiesst bush und sadam + einiges, was man wohl besser nicht schreibt.
hast du dir schon mal überlegt, dass bush auch nur durch eine art putsch an die macht kam?
@sosolalaa
Das ist ja schön, dann leben wir in der gleichen Welt.
Und mit der Lösung für Saddam kann ich mich auch gut anfreunden, und wenn der Amokläufer dann schon in der Region ist...
Aber Bush ist ein "mehr oder weniger" Demokratisch gewählter Präsident und ich denke das wird sich selbst bei unseren Amerikanischen Freunden mit der nächsten Wahl erledigt haben. Bis dahin bleibt nur zu hoffen, das er nicht zu viele Dummheiten macht.
So und jetzt ist Schluß, gute Nacht!
Das ist ja schön, dann leben wir in der gleichen Welt.
Und mit der Lösung für Saddam kann ich mich auch gut anfreunden, und wenn der Amokläufer dann schon in der Region ist...
Aber Bush ist ein "mehr oder weniger" Demokratisch gewählter Präsident und ich denke das wird sich selbst bei unseren Amerikanischen Freunden mit der nächsten Wahl erledigt haben. Bis dahin bleibt nur zu hoffen, das er nicht zu viele Dummheiten macht.
So und jetzt ist Schluß, gute Nacht!
schlaf gut :-)
Bush bleibt hart
Die US-Regierung bekräftigte, dass sie ungeachtet der irakischen Zusage, die bedingungslose Rückkehr der Inspektoren zu ermöglichen, am Ziel der Entmachtung des irakischen Präsidenten Saddam Hussein fest hält. Zudem wollen die USA offenbar ihren militärischen Druck auf den Irak weiter verstärken: Aus Regierungskreisen verlautete, im Gespräch sei bereits eine Verlegung von Tarnkappen-Bombern. spiegel.de
Die US-Regierung bekräftigte, dass sie ungeachtet der irakischen Zusage, die bedingungslose Rückkehr der Inspektoren zu ermöglichen, am Ziel der Entmachtung des irakischen Präsidenten Saddam Hussein fest hält. Zudem wollen die USA offenbar ihren militärischen Druck auf den Irak weiter verstärken: Aus Regierungskreisen verlautete, im Gespräch sei bereits eine Verlegung von Tarnkappen-Bombern. spiegel.de
M_B_S
auch dem normalen Betrachter ist seit dem Jugo-Einsatz bekannt, daß US-Tarnkappenbomber "aus Sicherheitsgründen" nur von den US-Inlandbasen starten, in der Luft aufgetankt werden und in die USA zurückfliegen.
auch dem normalen Betrachter ist seit dem Jugo-Einsatz bekannt, daß US-Tarnkappenbomber "aus Sicherheitsgründen" nur von den US-Inlandbasen starten, in der Luft aufgetankt werden und in die USA zurückfliegen.
US Oelbestände auf 18 Monatstief ! Bush braucht das Oel im Irak !
@Gillybaer
Gilt nur für die Langstrecken B2
F-118 sind effektiver wenn sie Näher am Ziel stationiert sind !
@Gillybaer
Gilt nur für die Langstrecken B2
F-118 sind effektiver wenn sie Näher am Ziel stationiert sind !
Jetzt werden die Russen nervös :
Russia fears US oil companies will take over world`s second-biggest reserves
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
26 September 2002
Internal links
Britain fights to restrain US over combative UN resolution
Eighty more Labour MPs ready to rebel, Blair is warned
British dossier is scorned as `propaganda`
March `will be biggest anti-war gathering`
Russia fears US oil companies will take over world`s second-biggest reserves
US claims proof of Iraq terror link
Deadpan Rumsfeld digs in over Germany
Donald Macintyre: Mr Blair would be wise not to ignore the unease over his Iraq policy
Anita Roddick: How I became a target for America`s zealots
Peter Carrington: Regime change is all very well, but who will replace Saddam?
Leading article: Both sides must share the blame for the breakdown in German-US relations
Oil companies from around the world are manoeuvring for the multibillion-dollar bonanza that would follow the ousting of Saddam Hussein.
Russia is so concerned that it has been holding secretive talks with the Iraqi opposition to shore up its economic interests in the country which still owes Moscow $7bn dollars from Soviet times.
With the second-biggest reserves in the world, Iraq`s underdeveloped oilfields have become a key negotiating chip and a backdrop to talks between the US and the other permanent members of the UN Security Council – all of which have major economic stakes in regime change in Iraq.
It has also given fuel to critics of America`s war plans who say the desire for regime change is at least partly driven by economics.
Oil industry experts say there is growing concern that America would dominate the Iraqi oil industry after Saddam. As a result, a number of oil companies have reportedly held talks with the Iraqi opposition to ensure they are involved in any future deals.
The Independent has learnt that the Russian government – which is friendly towards Iraq – recently dispatched a diplomat to hold talks with a senior official from the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the US-backed opposition umbrella group. At that meeting in Washington on 29 August – the first for seven years – the diplomat expressed worries that Russia would be kept out of the oil markets by the US.
James Woolsey, a former director of the CIA and a commentator on the relationship between oil and global security, told The Washington Post: "It`s pretty straightforward. France and Russia have oil companies and interests in Iraq. They should be told that if they are of assistance in moving Iraq toward decent government we`ll do the best we can to ensure the new government and American companies work closely with them.
"If they throw in their lot with Saddam it will be difficult to the point of impossible to persuade the new Iraqi government to work with them." Iraq has confirmed oil reserves of 112 billion barrels, second only to Saudi Arabia, with perhaps double that in undiscovered reserves. With sanctions in place, the current production is just 2.8 million barrels a day – a capacity it struggles to reach because of deteriorating equipment.
Under the United Nations` oil-for-food programme, it exports about one million barrels a day. Since 1998, two subsidiaries of Houston-based Halliburton, the company previously headed by the US Vice-President, Dick Cheney, have done $24m (£15.3m) of business to repair Iraqi oil pipelines under the UN programme.
Experts say that given sufficient further foreign investment, Iraq could be producing a total of 6 million barrels a day within five years, making it the world`s third biggest producer behind Russia and Saudi Arabia.
But which companies will benefit from these rich pickings? Since the end of the Gulf War, companies from more than a dozen nations – including Britain – have had discussions with Iraq about developing oilfields. In 1997, Russia`s Lukoil negotiated a $4bn deal to develop the West Qurna oilfield while last year another Russian company, Slavneft, signed a $42m (£27m) deal to drill in Tuba.
The French TotalFinaElf company has negotiated the rights for the vast Majnoon oilfield, which is near the Iranian border.
It is unclear whether such deals would be honoured by a post-Saddam Iraqi government. Faisal Qaragholi, an official with the INC, said that all such deals would be reviewed. "If the deal [helps] the Iraqi people then it will be carried on, if it does not, it will be renegotiated," he said.
The INC`s chairman, Ahmed Chalabi, believes the US should head a consortium to develop Iraq`s oil. "American companies will have a big shot at Iraqi oil," he said.
Such comments horrify the Russian government, which as a major oil exporter has much to lose should America assume a dominant position in Iraq`s oil industry.
Thane Gustafson, senior director with the Cambridge Energy Associates (Cera) consultants, said the issue was almost certainly a factor in Russia`s negotiations with the US about a new UN resolution over weapons inspectors. "Oil is bound to be on [President Vladimir] Putin`s mind because of the importance of oil exports," he said. "It`s bound to worry Putin. He would probably prefer things pretty much as they are now."
Russia`s concern led it to dispatch Andrew Kroshkin, a diplomat, to hold talks with the INC`s Washington director, Entifadh Qanbar. Mr Qanbar said that during the two-hour meeting at the INC office, Mr Kroshkin said the Iraq policy of Russia – which has estimated debts of $100bn (£64m) – was "100 per made by money".
"He told me that he had been told that if the Americans overthrow Iraq they will not let the Russians do business in Iraq," he said. "We have seen this in the Balkans. He wanted to say that Russia`s dealings with Iraq are based on historical and economic relations, not on relations with Saddam."
The importance of Iraqi oil is also to be discussed next week at a US-Russian energy summit in Houston at which more than 100 US and Russian energy companies are expected to be represented.
In this environment, it is likely that most leading oil companies are actively trying to position themselves to operate in Iraq if Saddam is overthrown. The US oil giants ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco both refused to say whether they had been holding talks with Iraqi opposition. Both said, however, that they would be interested in operating in Iraq if sanctions permitted.
A spokesman for Royal Dutch Shell, the British-Dutch company which held discussions with President Saddam about developing the Ratawi oilfield several years ago, said it had not approached the INC. But if sanctions were lifted, the company would be interested in dealing with Iraq, he said.
James Lucier, an oil analyst with Prudential Securities, said: "There`s no real upside for American oil companies to take a very aggressive stance at this stage. There`ll be plenty of time in the future."
***********************************************************
Man kann nur hoffen , das Saddam seine Oelquellen in die Luft jagt und für hunderte von Jahren verseucht , damit ein für alle mal Schluss ist mit diesem Wahnsinn :
Krieg ums OEL !
Dann stehen sie alle da wie die Deppen !
Russia fears US oil companies will take over world`s second-biggest reserves
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
26 September 2002
Internal links
Britain fights to restrain US over combative UN resolution
Eighty more Labour MPs ready to rebel, Blair is warned
British dossier is scorned as `propaganda`
March `will be biggest anti-war gathering`
Russia fears US oil companies will take over world`s second-biggest reserves
US claims proof of Iraq terror link
Deadpan Rumsfeld digs in over Germany
Donald Macintyre: Mr Blair would be wise not to ignore the unease over his Iraq policy
Anita Roddick: How I became a target for America`s zealots
Peter Carrington: Regime change is all very well, but who will replace Saddam?
Leading article: Both sides must share the blame for the breakdown in German-US relations
Oil companies from around the world are manoeuvring for the multibillion-dollar bonanza that would follow the ousting of Saddam Hussein.
Russia is so concerned that it has been holding secretive talks with the Iraqi opposition to shore up its economic interests in the country which still owes Moscow $7bn dollars from Soviet times.
With the second-biggest reserves in the world, Iraq`s underdeveloped oilfields have become a key negotiating chip and a backdrop to talks between the US and the other permanent members of the UN Security Council – all of which have major economic stakes in regime change in Iraq.
It has also given fuel to critics of America`s war plans who say the desire for regime change is at least partly driven by economics.
Oil industry experts say there is growing concern that America would dominate the Iraqi oil industry after Saddam. As a result, a number of oil companies have reportedly held talks with the Iraqi opposition to ensure they are involved in any future deals.
The Independent has learnt that the Russian government – which is friendly towards Iraq – recently dispatched a diplomat to hold talks with a senior official from the Iraqi National Congress (INC), the US-backed opposition umbrella group. At that meeting in Washington on 29 August – the first for seven years – the diplomat expressed worries that Russia would be kept out of the oil markets by the US.
James Woolsey, a former director of the CIA and a commentator on the relationship between oil and global security, told The Washington Post: "It`s pretty straightforward. France and Russia have oil companies and interests in Iraq. They should be told that if they are of assistance in moving Iraq toward decent government we`ll do the best we can to ensure the new government and American companies work closely with them.
"If they throw in their lot with Saddam it will be difficult to the point of impossible to persuade the new Iraqi government to work with them." Iraq has confirmed oil reserves of 112 billion barrels, second only to Saudi Arabia, with perhaps double that in undiscovered reserves. With sanctions in place, the current production is just 2.8 million barrels a day – a capacity it struggles to reach because of deteriorating equipment.
Under the United Nations` oil-for-food programme, it exports about one million barrels a day. Since 1998, two subsidiaries of Houston-based Halliburton, the company previously headed by the US Vice-President, Dick Cheney, have done $24m (£15.3m) of business to repair Iraqi oil pipelines under the UN programme.
Experts say that given sufficient further foreign investment, Iraq could be producing a total of 6 million barrels a day within five years, making it the world`s third biggest producer behind Russia and Saudi Arabia.
But which companies will benefit from these rich pickings? Since the end of the Gulf War, companies from more than a dozen nations – including Britain – have had discussions with Iraq about developing oilfields. In 1997, Russia`s Lukoil negotiated a $4bn deal to develop the West Qurna oilfield while last year another Russian company, Slavneft, signed a $42m (£27m) deal to drill in Tuba.
The French TotalFinaElf company has negotiated the rights for the vast Majnoon oilfield, which is near the Iranian border.
It is unclear whether such deals would be honoured by a post-Saddam Iraqi government. Faisal Qaragholi, an official with the INC, said that all such deals would be reviewed. "If the deal [helps] the Iraqi people then it will be carried on, if it does not, it will be renegotiated," he said.
The INC`s chairman, Ahmed Chalabi, believes the US should head a consortium to develop Iraq`s oil. "American companies will have a big shot at Iraqi oil," he said.
Such comments horrify the Russian government, which as a major oil exporter has much to lose should America assume a dominant position in Iraq`s oil industry.
Thane Gustafson, senior director with the Cambridge Energy Associates (Cera) consultants, said the issue was almost certainly a factor in Russia`s negotiations with the US about a new UN resolution over weapons inspectors. "Oil is bound to be on [President Vladimir] Putin`s mind because of the importance of oil exports," he said. "It`s bound to worry Putin. He would probably prefer things pretty much as they are now."
Russia`s concern led it to dispatch Andrew Kroshkin, a diplomat, to hold talks with the INC`s Washington director, Entifadh Qanbar. Mr Qanbar said that during the two-hour meeting at the INC office, Mr Kroshkin said the Iraq policy of Russia – which has estimated debts of $100bn (£64m) – was "100 per made by money".
"He told me that he had been told that if the Americans overthrow Iraq they will not let the Russians do business in Iraq," he said. "We have seen this in the Balkans. He wanted to say that Russia`s dealings with Iraq are based on historical and economic relations, not on relations with Saddam."
The importance of Iraqi oil is also to be discussed next week at a US-Russian energy summit in Houston at which more than 100 US and Russian energy companies are expected to be represented.
In this environment, it is likely that most leading oil companies are actively trying to position themselves to operate in Iraq if Saddam is overthrown. The US oil giants ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco both refused to say whether they had been holding talks with Iraqi opposition. Both said, however, that they would be interested in operating in Iraq if sanctions permitted.
A spokesman for Royal Dutch Shell, the British-Dutch company which held discussions with President Saddam about developing the Ratawi oilfield several years ago, said it had not approached the INC. But if sanctions were lifted, the company would be interested in dealing with Iraq, he said.
James Lucier, an oil analyst with Prudential Securities, said: "There`s no real upside for American oil companies to take a very aggressive stance at this stage. There`ll be plenty of time in the future."
***********************************************************
Man kann nur hoffen , das Saddam seine Oelquellen in die Luft jagt und für hunderte von Jahren verseucht , damit ein für alle mal Schluss ist mit diesem Wahnsinn :
Krieg ums OEL !
Dann stehen sie alle da wie die Deppen !
Die Oelmafia in den USA stellt schon mal den Sekt kalt !
Aber vielleicht lösen sich Ihre Träume ja in Rauch auf
Hoffen wir das Beste !
Aber vielleicht lösen sich Ihre Träume ja in Rauch auf
Hoffen wir das Beste !
Schade, und wir gehen mal wiede leer aus :-(
Ich kann die Amis schon verstehen. Abgesehen davon teilen die das Öl nicht auf sondern die Verträge und davon profitieren auch die Iraker.
Ich kann die Amis schon verstehen. Abgesehen davon teilen die das Öl nicht auf sondern die Verträge und davon profitieren auch die Iraker.
Reuters
BIZFEATURE-War could be big business for Halliburton
Wednesday March 19, 2:58 pm ET
By Carolyn Koo
NEW YORK, March 19 (Reuters) - When it comes to making money from a war in Iraq, few can match the firepower of the company once headed by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney.
Houston-based Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL - News) can build roads and bridges and camps for American forces. It can transport personnel and provide other logistics. It can fight any fires Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein might set. And after the war, assuming a U.S. victory, it can help restore Iraq`s infrastructure and oil production.
ADVERTISEMENT
While questions remain over how much the work will boost the company`s stock price, Halliburton`s KBR engineering and construction division "is basically the `corps of engineers` to the U.S. military," said Jim Wicklund, an analyst at Banc of America Securities (News - Websites). "It is expected that the occupying army`s infrastructure could in large part be supplied by KBR."
At the same time, the company`s oilfield services business, which is second only to Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB - News), is likely to supply most of the heavy equipment to fight fires that Iraqi forces could set to oil wells and oil fields, as they did in Kuwait during the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
And should the U.S. emerge victorious, Halliburton -- which develops oil fields and drills for oil all over the world -- has the connections and businesses to play a major role in rebuilding Iraq and ramping the nation`s oil production capacity back up to pre-1991 Persian Gulf War levels.
"They have the businesses. They have the government relationship already well-established, and, as we all know, Cheney was the CEO, so it makes logical sense," said Denis Walsh, an equity analyst who covers the energy sector for State Street Research and Management.
NO COMMENT ON CONTRACTS
A Halliburton spokeswoman declined to speculate on "what may or may not happen with regards to Iraq."
She referred all queries to the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the U.S. Agency for International Development, which both said that contracts for fighting fires and rebuilding Iraq`s infrastructure have yet to be awarded. Neither agency would disclose whether Halliburton had submitted any bids.
Other companies that could bid for firefighting contracts include Boots & Coots International Well Control Inc. (AMEX:WEL - News), Canada`s Safety Boss Inc., RPC Inc.`s (NYSE:RES - News) Cudd Pressure Control and Superior Energy Services Inc.`s (NYSE:SPN - News) Wild Well Control Inc.
Reports earlier this month said that Halliburton won a contract to oversee firefighting in Iraq`s oilfields but that has not been confirmed by either the company or the DOD.
"It is our information that a contract framework has already been signed," said Wicklund, who rates Halliburton a "buy" and does not own any of its shares.
This wouldn`t be the first time Halliburton has played an important role in a U.S. war. Years before Cheney`s stint at the helm, a predecessor company built the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station and several warships during World War Two. It also helped build the Phan Rang Air Base in Vietnam in 1965.
More recently, after the Persian Gulf War, Halliburton helped put out oil well fires and repaired damaged buildings in Kuwait. It also provided food, laundry, transportation and other services to U.S. peacekeeping forces in Bosnia, Croatia and Hungary during the Balkans conflict in the 1990s.
Estimates of how much Halliburton and other companies could reap from the infrastructure and restoration work vary, but analyst Michael Urban of Deutsche Bank said it could be as much as a total of $3 billion.
DON`T QUIT YOUR DAY JOB
How much Halliburton would get is difficult to gauge, though any contracts it wins would certainly generate revenue, cash flow and earnings.
The potential contracts come at a time when Halliburton is contending with its liability for asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits, though the company made progress last December with a $4 billion settlement deal.
"The stock price would reflect that they have had investor concern over the ultimate (asbestos) liability," said Pierre Conner, an analyst with Hibernia Southcoast Capital who rates Halliburton a "buy" and does not own any of its shares.
The contracts also may not do much for the company`s stock price, since the firefighting business is not a recurring one and the profit margins of the construction business are not typically high.
"While both would be positives to Halliburton, they aren`t in our opinion overriding reasons to buy the stock," Wicklund said.
"I would think if you got any jump in the stock, it would be short-lived and somewhat muted by history. It`s like winning a $3 lottery ticket. It beats not winning, but you can`t quit your day job."
Halliburton shares were up 54 cents or about 2.6 percent to $20.36 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange (News - Websites) on Wednesday. The stock is up 11.7 percent this year through Tuesday`s close, outperforming Schlumberger, which is down 6.2 percent, as well as the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Oil Service Index (Philadelphia:^OSX - News), which is down less than 1 percent, both in same period. (Additional reporting by Nichola Groom in New York)
BIZFEATURE-War could be big business for Halliburton
Wednesday March 19, 2:58 pm ET
By Carolyn Koo
NEW YORK, March 19 (Reuters) - When it comes to making money from a war in Iraq, few can match the firepower of the company once headed by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney.
Houston-based Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL - News) can build roads and bridges and camps for American forces. It can transport personnel and provide other logistics. It can fight any fires Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein might set. And after the war, assuming a U.S. victory, it can help restore Iraq`s infrastructure and oil production.
ADVERTISEMENT
While questions remain over how much the work will boost the company`s stock price, Halliburton`s KBR engineering and construction division "is basically the `corps of engineers` to the U.S. military," said Jim Wicklund, an analyst at Banc of America Securities (News - Websites). "It is expected that the occupying army`s infrastructure could in large part be supplied by KBR."
At the same time, the company`s oilfield services business, which is second only to Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB - News), is likely to supply most of the heavy equipment to fight fires that Iraqi forces could set to oil wells and oil fields, as they did in Kuwait during the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
And should the U.S. emerge victorious, Halliburton -- which develops oil fields and drills for oil all over the world -- has the connections and businesses to play a major role in rebuilding Iraq and ramping the nation`s oil production capacity back up to pre-1991 Persian Gulf War levels.
"They have the businesses. They have the government relationship already well-established, and, as we all know, Cheney was the CEO, so it makes logical sense," said Denis Walsh, an equity analyst who covers the energy sector for State Street Research and Management.
NO COMMENT ON CONTRACTS
A Halliburton spokeswoman declined to speculate on "what may or may not happen with regards to Iraq."
She referred all queries to the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and the U.S. Agency for International Development, which both said that contracts for fighting fires and rebuilding Iraq`s infrastructure have yet to be awarded. Neither agency would disclose whether Halliburton had submitted any bids.
Other companies that could bid for firefighting contracts include Boots & Coots International Well Control Inc. (AMEX:WEL - News), Canada`s Safety Boss Inc., RPC Inc.`s (NYSE:RES - News) Cudd Pressure Control and Superior Energy Services Inc.`s (NYSE:SPN - News) Wild Well Control Inc.
Reports earlier this month said that Halliburton won a contract to oversee firefighting in Iraq`s oilfields but that has not been confirmed by either the company or the DOD.
"It is our information that a contract framework has already been signed," said Wicklund, who rates Halliburton a "buy" and does not own any of its shares.
This wouldn`t be the first time Halliburton has played an important role in a U.S. war. Years before Cheney`s stint at the helm, a predecessor company built the Corpus Christi Naval Air Station and several warships during World War Two. It also helped build the Phan Rang Air Base in Vietnam in 1965.
More recently, after the Persian Gulf War, Halliburton helped put out oil well fires and repaired damaged buildings in Kuwait. It also provided food, laundry, transportation and other services to U.S. peacekeeping forces in Bosnia, Croatia and Hungary during the Balkans conflict in the 1990s.
Estimates of how much Halliburton and other companies could reap from the infrastructure and restoration work vary, but analyst Michael Urban of Deutsche Bank said it could be as much as a total of $3 billion.
DON`T QUIT YOUR DAY JOB
How much Halliburton would get is difficult to gauge, though any contracts it wins would certainly generate revenue, cash flow and earnings.
The potential contracts come at a time when Halliburton is contending with its liability for asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits, though the company made progress last December with a $4 billion settlement deal.
"The stock price would reflect that they have had investor concern over the ultimate (asbestos) liability," said Pierre Conner, an analyst with Hibernia Southcoast Capital who rates Halliburton a "buy" and does not own any of its shares.
The contracts also may not do much for the company`s stock price, since the firefighting business is not a recurring one and the profit margins of the construction business are not typically high.
"While both would be positives to Halliburton, they aren`t in our opinion overriding reasons to buy the stock," Wicklund said.
"I would think if you got any jump in the stock, it would be short-lived and somewhat muted by history. It`s like winning a $3 lottery ticket. It beats not winning, but you can`t quit your day job."
Halliburton shares were up 54 cents or about 2.6 percent to $20.36 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange (News - Websites) on Wednesday. The stock is up 11.7 percent this year through Tuesday`s close, outperforming Schlumberger, which is down 6.2 percent, as well as the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Oil Service Index (Philadelphia:^OSX - News), which is down less than 1 percent, both in same period. (Additional reporting by Nichola Groom in New York)
Eigentlich sehe ich beides gar nicht gern.
Aber fragt mich mal, wenn schon, was ich lieber sehe: einen toten Ami in Uniform oder einen Iraki.
Aber fragt mich mal, wenn schon, was ich lieber sehe: einen toten Ami in Uniform oder einen Iraki.
Ach schau an die Polen wollen auch was von der Beute
Poland Acknowledges Oil Ambition in Iraq
07/05/2003 13:20
Too many companies wish to assist in Iraq`s restoration
Washington and London still hesitate to acknowledge the fact that the war in Iraq was launched because of oil. However, their true ally - Poland - does not see anything blameworthy about it. Polish Foreign Minister Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz has recently stated that Poland has never concealed its aspiration to gain a direct access to oil deposits. Saddam is a tyrant and a monster, of course, but oil is much more important.
A group of Polish companies has recently signed an agreement to participate in the restoration of Iraq. Now Poland will have both the military and the economic presence in Iraq. In fact, no one had any doubts that the American administration would find a way to thank its true ally that had totally supported the military campaign.
Apparently, the list of the countries that wish to assist in Iraq`s restoration is not going to be restricted to Poland only. The White House decided to make a small present to GUUAM members (an organization that unites former USSR states Georgia, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldavia). The summit of the organization took place in the resort city of Yalta on July 3-4th. Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Steven Pifer was present at the summit. Rosbalt news agency reports, Mr. Pifer said at the meeting that the US administration could assist GUUAM countries` companies regarding the restoration of Iraq. Steven Pifer said that the USA was ready to render technical and other kind of help. It is worth mentioning here that Ukraine and Azerbaijan have already decided to dispatch their military men to Iraq.
Brushing aside the Iraqi issue, we would like to point out that Moldavia and Uzbek presidents arrived for the GUUAM summit in Yalta as well. Rosbalt said, Russia had played an important role in this respect, because the plans of the American administration about GUUAM were not good for the Russian government. Apparently, the summit results are not going to be comforting for its participants. Romania and Bulgaria refused to joint the organization, despite the active support on the part of the US administration.
On the other hand, those events are not directly linked with Iraq. As far as the post-war organization of Iraq is concerned, one should say that Moscow has repeatedly stated, Russian companies would not be discriminated in Iraq, so they would have an opportunity to restore Iraq and extract oil. Allegedly, adequate affirmations have already been obtained from the White House. Yet, it is not clear, if Iraq manages to house everyone to wish to restore it - oil deposits are not extendable.
Vasily Bubnov
Read the original in Russian: http://world.pravda.ru/world/2003/5/15/39/11974_Polskaneft.h… (Translated by: Dmitry Sudakov)
Saddam is a tyrant and a monster, of course, but oil is much more important.
Poland Acknowledges Oil Ambition in Iraq
07/05/2003 13:20
Too many companies wish to assist in Iraq`s restoration
Washington and London still hesitate to acknowledge the fact that the war in Iraq was launched because of oil. However, their true ally - Poland - does not see anything blameworthy about it. Polish Foreign Minister Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz has recently stated that Poland has never concealed its aspiration to gain a direct access to oil deposits. Saddam is a tyrant and a monster, of course, but oil is much more important.
A group of Polish companies has recently signed an agreement to participate in the restoration of Iraq. Now Poland will have both the military and the economic presence in Iraq. In fact, no one had any doubts that the American administration would find a way to thank its true ally that had totally supported the military campaign.
Apparently, the list of the countries that wish to assist in Iraq`s restoration is not going to be restricted to Poland only. The White House decided to make a small present to GUUAM members (an organization that unites former USSR states Georgia, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldavia). The summit of the organization took place in the resort city of Yalta on July 3-4th. Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Steven Pifer was present at the summit. Rosbalt news agency reports, Mr. Pifer said at the meeting that the US administration could assist GUUAM countries` companies regarding the restoration of Iraq. Steven Pifer said that the USA was ready to render technical and other kind of help. It is worth mentioning here that Ukraine and Azerbaijan have already decided to dispatch their military men to Iraq.
Brushing aside the Iraqi issue, we would like to point out that Moldavia and Uzbek presidents arrived for the GUUAM summit in Yalta as well. Rosbalt said, Russia had played an important role in this respect, because the plans of the American administration about GUUAM were not good for the Russian government. Apparently, the summit results are not going to be comforting for its participants. Romania and Bulgaria refused to joint the organization, despite the active support on the part of the US administration.
On the other hand, those events are not directly linked with Iraq. As far as the post-war organization of Iraq is concerned, one should say that Moscow has repeatedly stated, Russian companies would not be discriminated in Iraq, so they would have an opportunity to restore Iraq and extract oil. Allegedly, adequate affirmations have already been obtained from the White House. Yet, it is not clear, if Iraq manages to house everyone to wish to restore it - oil deposits are not extendable.
Vasily Bubnov
Read the original in Russian: http://world.pravda.ru/world/2003/5/15/39/11974_Polskaneft.h… (Translated by: Dmitry Sudakov)
Saddam is a tyrant and a monster, of course, but oil is much more important.
Jetzt wo selbst Polen zu den Erdöl-produzierenden-Ländern gehört,
kommt hier auch unter den Kritikern-,
jedoch Freunden der "Kein Blut für Öl"-Politik langsam
das Grübeln und Wanken,-(der Zug, der für uns abgefahren
sein wird , ist schon in Bewegung)...
Was wird aus uns, wenn Spanien - Italien und Polen Erdöl
haben ( Polen sogar noch billige Löhne ) , und wir
nicht...? bibber, bibber...? Wenn das Benzin hier
2 Euro kostet und in den genannten Staaten einen...?..
Dann bekommt auch der Letzte Gutmensch mit, das das
Leben verdammt "ungerecht" sein kann..., und was
passiert dann in den Ölkritischen-Köpfen, wenn die
Konkurrenzfähigkeit absackt und ihre Lehrer-Stelle
gefährdet wird ( ja, ja...es gibt sehr viel nichtbeamtete Lehrer...)...???
Dann können sie aufrechtn Hauptes
vor Frau und Kinder treten und auf ihre moralische
Integrität zeigen, dass sie zumindes im Recht
seien, und die Lebensumstände auf Grund dessen, sogar
noch ganz kommod seien..., leider ist das Arbeitslosengeld zwar nicht
mehr so üppig wie früher aber man ist sauber...
Eventuell sehen dann viele auch nur noch ihre einzige Chance darin eine
gewisse Karriere zu machen, wenn sie ihre Kinder mit Gürtelbomben loszuschicken , um
die Situation zu ändern...
Vieleicht steht man dann moralisch ganz schön dar...schön blöd nämlich...
kommt hier auch unter den Kritikern-,
jedoch Freunden der "Kein Blut für Öl"-Politik langsam
das Grübeln und Wanken,-(der Zug, der für uns abgefahren
sein wird , ist schon in Bewegung)...
Was wird aus uns, wenn Spanien - Italien und Polen Erdöl
haben ( Polen sogar noch billige Löhne ) , und wir
nicht...? bibber, bibber...? Wenn das Benzin hier
2 Euro kostet und in den genannten Staaten einen...?..
Dann bekommt auch der Letzte Gutmensch mit, das das
Leben verdammt "ungerecht" sein kann..., und was
passiert dann in den Ölkritischen-Köpfen, wenn die
Konkurrenzfähigkeit absackt und ihre Lehrer-Stelle
gefährdet wird ( ja, ja...es gibt sehr viel nichtbeamtete Lehrer...)...???
Dann können sie aufrechtn Hauptes
vor Frau und Kinder treten und auf ihre moralische
Integrität zeigen, dass sie zumindes im Recht
seien, und die Lebensumstände auf Grund dessen, sogar
noch ganz kommod seien..., leider ist das Arbeitslosengeld zwar nicht
mehr so üppig wie früher aber man ist sauber...
Eventuell sehen dann viele auch nur noch ihre einzige Chance darin eine
gewisse Karriere zu machen, wenn sie ihre Kinder mit Gürtelbomben loszuschicken , um
die Situation zu ändern...
Vieleicht steht man dann moralisch ganz schön dar...schön blöd nämlich...
DurchsuchenBeitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 94 | ||
| 74 | ||
| 66 | ||
| 62 | ||
| 61 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 28 | ||
| 27 | ||
| 27 | ||
| 23 |
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 19 | ||
| 17 |
